Differential effects of the incorporation of 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-
[beta]-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (FIAU) on the binding of the
transcription factors, AP-1 and TFIID, to their cognate target DNA sequences
Differential effects of the incorporation of 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro- [beta]-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (FIAU) on the binding of the transcription factors, AP-1 and TFIID, to their cognate target DNA sequences
K. A.
Staschke
,
K. K.
Richardson
,
T. E.
Mabry
,
A. J.
Baxter
,
J. C.
Scheuring
,
D. M.
Huffman
,
W. C.
Smith
,
F. C.
Richardson
and
J. M.
Colacino*
Lilly Research Laboratories,
Indianapolis
, IN 46285-0438,
USA
Received August 22, 1996
;
Revised and Accepted September 19, 1996
ABSTRACT
The thymidine analog, 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-
[beta]
-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (FIAU), is incorporated into DNA in cell
culture and
in vivo
. To investigate the effect of incorporation of FIAU into DNA on the binding of
transcription factors, oligonucleotide duplexes which bind specifically to
activator protein 1 (AP-1) or to TFIID were synthesized and binding of these oligonucleotides to
their respective proteins was studied using gel-shift analysis. When thymidine at position -3, -1, 1 or 7 (relative to the first thymidine of the core
binding sequence) was replaced with FIAU, binding to AP-1 was
~
82, 28, 86 and 51%, respectively, of the binding to the non-substituted oligonucleotide to AP-1. When thymidine at position 3 or 5 (each adjacent to the center of
dyad symmetry) was replaced with FIAU, binding to AP-1 was abrogated. Oligonucleotides containing FIAU at positions -1, 3 or 5, were much less able to compete with radiolabeled wild-type oligonucleotides for binding to AP-1. In contrast, the presence of FIAU, depending on its
location, resulted in the increased binding of TFIID to its consensus target
DNA sequence. These results indicate that incorporation of FIAU into DNA may
induce local conformational changes resulting in the altered ability of
transcriptional factors to bind to their cognate DNA sequences. Additional
studies demonstrated that the presence of FIAU at a position 5
'
to the cleavage site in the consensus sequence T*TAA (where * is the cleavage site) inhibited restriction of the oligomeric duplex by
Mse
I.
INTRODUCTION
The activation or repression of gene expression is dependent upon the
recognition of specific DNA sequences by their cognate transcriptional
regulatory proteins. Recognition of target DNA sequences involves the ability
of proteins to `read' local DNA topography (
1
). Three well studied examples of protein-DNA interactions include: the binding of the activator protein 1 (AP-1) to the palindromic TPA response element (TRE) (
2
,
3
); the binding of the
trp
repressor protein to its operator sequence (
4
); and the binding of TFIID to the sequence TATAAAA (as reviewed in
5
).
The thymidine analog FIAU [1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-[beta]-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil is a
potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in cell culture (
6
,
7
) and in the woodchuck model of HBV infection (
8
). FIAU contains an intact 3'-OH and is able to incorporate into nuclear DNA
in vitro
(
9
-
13
) and
in vivo
(
14
). Additionally, FIAU is able to incorporate into mitochondrial DNA (
12
,
13
) and duck hepatitis B virus primer DNA (
15
). It has been shown that duplex DNA containing monofluoronucleotides has an
altered conformation (
16
). Therefore, incorporation of a halogenated nucleoside analog, such as FIAU,
into DNA might be expected to alter DNA topography leading to the disruption of
the protein-DNA interactions. To investigate the potential for FIAU to affect
interactions between proteins and DNA, we synthesized oligonucleotides
containing the consensus sequence for binding to AP-1 or TFIID using FIAU as a substitute for thymidine in various nucleotide
positions. The ability of these transcription factors to bind to
oligonucleotides containing FIAU was examined by gel-shift analysis.
Previously published work (
17
) demonstrated that the incorporation of the nucleoside analog, 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC) into the recognition sequence for
Bam
HI did not alter, appreciably, the sensitivity of the oligonucleotide duplex to cleavage by this restriction
endonuclease. However, incorporation of dFdC into the recognition sequence at a position 5' to the cleavage site of
Kpn
I did decrease the sensitivity of the oligonucleotide duplex to this restriction
endonuclease. Therefore, experiments were conducted to determine the effects of
the presence of FIAU on the susceptibility of substituted oligonucleotides to
cleavage by the restriction endonuclease
Bam
HI or to cleavage by
Mse
I, which cleaves DNA between thymidine residues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of nuclear extracts
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays: AP-1
The binding reaction mixture consisted of 10-15 [mu]g of HeLa cell nuclear extract, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 4% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl
2
, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl, 0.05 mg/ml poly(dI-dC)
.
poly(dI-dC) and
32
P-labelled probe (~0.5 ng) in a final volume of 10 [mu]l. Reactions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min and
then loaded onto a 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed in 1* Tris-glycine-EDTA buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.38 mM glycine, 2.1 mM EDTA).
Following electrophoresis, gels were dried under vacuum. Dried gels were
exposed to X-ray film and quantified using a Bio Image Whole Band Analyzer (Millipore, Bedford, MA). For competition studies, binding reactions were incubated with cold competitor
oligonucleotides for 10 min prior to addition of the
32
P-labelled probe. The amount of cold competitor required to reduce binding
by 90% was determined by the method of Reed and Muench
(
19
).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays: TFIID
Gel retardation studies were conducted, in general, following methods described
(
20
). Ten pmol of duplexed oligomer were end-labeled with
32
P using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) following established procedures and unincorporated radiolabel was
removed using Sephadex G-25 spin columns. Binding of TFIID oligonucleotide duplexes was carried out
by incubating 2 pmol of duplex oligomer in a total of 5 [mu]l containing 1 footprint unit (f.p.u.) of TFIID (Promega Corp., Madison,
WI), 2.5 [mu]l binding buffer (40 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 4 mM spermidine, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 20% glycerol, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 200 [mu]g/ml BSA) and 1.5 [mu]l water. Binding was allowed to occur over 40 min at room temperature after which 2 [mu]l of glycerol were added and the entire sample was used for
electrophoresis. Oligonucleotides bound to TFIID were separated from unbound
oligonucleotides on 4% polyacrylamide (40:1 acrylamide:bis-acrylamide, running buffer: 0.025 M Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.19 M glycine, 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM MgCl
2
) (
21
). Gels were electrophoresed for 90 min at 30 mA after which time they were transferred
to Whatman DEAE paper and dried under vacuum.
The extent of binding, as indicated by complex formation, was quantified using a
Molecular Dynamics Phosphorimager (Sunnydale, CA). The radioactivity in each
spot was indexed using the volume measurement. To account for loading
differences the extent of gel retardation was calculated as follows:
The TFIID oligomeric duplexes used in these studies are shown in Figure
3
A.
The effects of FIAU modifications on TFIID binding were evaluated using a two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) with each oligomer as an experimental treatment effect and each replicate as a blocking factor. A square root transformation of the measured
response values was made prior to analysis in order to satisfy the ANOVA
assumptions of normality and variance homogeneity. Mean responses for FIAU-modified oligos were compared pairwise with the mean response for the
unmodified oligo using Dunnett's procedure (
22
). All tests were completed using the MIXED Procedure (
23
) and a nominal 0.05 significance level.
Restriction enzyme digestion
Duplex oligomer (0.33 pmol) containing the restriction enzyme sequence for
Mse
I (Table
3
) and 5'-end-labeled with
32
P were digested with 1 [mu]l
Mse
I (4000 U/ml), 1 [mu]l reaction buffer (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and water q.s. to 10 [mu]l. Similarly, duplex oligomers (0.33 pmol) containing the restriction
enzyme sequence for
Bam
HI (Table
3
) and 5'-end-labeled with
32
P were digested with 1 [mu]l
Bam
HI (10 000 U/ml) and 1 [mu]l reaction buffer B (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Water was added
to all samples q.s. to 10 [mu]l. Digestions were allowed to proceed for 180 min after which time little or
no further digestion was observed (data not shown). The reactions were stopped
by addition of 5 [mu]l Stop Solution (USB, Cleveland, OH) followed by quick freeze in a dry ice-isopropanol bath.
Five microliters of each labeled digested duplex oligomer were electrophoresed
on a 20% polyacrylamide gel along with 5 [mu]l of labeled undigested duplex oligomer. The gels were then scanned into a
Molecular Dynamics Phosphorimager and the amount of radioactivity associated
with the uncut oligomer and each restriction fragment was quantitated in
phosphorimaging units. The units associated with the uncut oligomer were
divided by total units associated with both uncut and restriction oligomers.
The quotient was multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of uncut oligomer
remaining after 180 min. Percentage changes were used to determine the extent
of enzyme digestion.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Gel shift analysis of AP-1 binding to non-substituted and FIAU-substituted duplex DNA
The toxicity of a particular nucleoside analog is a function of its metabolism
and the extent to which it is incorporated into nuclear DNA, mtDNA, or both
(reviewed in
24
). The cytotoxicities of 9-[beta]-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine (
25
) or 1-[beta]-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (
26
) have been shown to be correlated directly with the incorporation of these
nucleoside analogs into DNA. Previous studies (
9
-
14
) have demonstrated that FIAU is able to incorporate into cellular DNA.
Furthermore, a linear relationship between the amount of FIAU incorporated into
U-937 or MOLT-4 cellular DNA at 24 h and cytotoxicity at 72 h was established (
11
). To study the potential implications of such incorporation, we used a model
system in which oligonucleotides representing the TPA response element (TRE)
that binds specifically to activator protein 1 (AP-1)
(
2
,
3
) were synthesized with FIAU in place of thymidines at various positions in the
AP-1 binding sequence. The oligonucleotides corresponding to the top and
bottom strands of the AP-1 consensus sequence containing FIAU at the indicated thymidine positions are shown in Figure
1
A. Each oligonucleotide was annealed to its complementary oligonucleotide and the
resulting double-stranded DNA duplexes were end-labeled with
32
P and incubated with HeLa cell nuclear extracts as described in the Materials
and Methods. Binding of AP-1 to the end-labeled DNA was evaluated by gel shift analysis. In Figure
1
B, binding of AP-1 to the non-substituted oligonucleotide duplex DNA is shown in the lane marked
AP-1. When thymidine at position -3, -1, 1 or 7 was replaced with FIAU, binding to AP-1 was 82, 28, 86 and 51%, respectively, that of the
binding of AP-1 to the non-substituted oligonucleotide duplex. When thymidine at position 3 or
5, each directly adjacent to the center of dyad symmetry of the TRE, was
replaced by FIAU, binding to AP-1 was completely inhibited (Fig.
1
B and C). Thus, when FIAU replaces thymidine at positions within the sequence
critical for binding to AP-1, binding is dramatically reduced. Although the most profound effects on
AP-1 binding to the TRE were seen with FIAU substitutions at positions 3 and
5 of the TRE, when FIAU was present at position -1 of the TRE, binding to AP-1 was also inhibited. While it is not clear why this substitution
has such an effect on AP-1 binding, it has been suggested that nucleotides outside the core binding
sequence may influence the affinity of AP-1 for the TRE (
27
).
Substitutions of FIAU at positions -3, 1 or 7 of the TRE resulted in little or no effect on binding to AP-1.
Binding of AP-1 to its target sequence in the presence of FIAU-containing cold competitor DNAs
Binding of AP-1 to its target DNA sequence was carried out in the presence of non-substituted or substituted cold competitor DNAs as described in
Materials and Methods. As shown in Figure
2
A, with the exception of -3F, cold competitor DNA containing FIAU was less able to compete with end-labeled DNA for binding to AP-1. The extent of binding, as indicated by complex formation,
was quantified by densitometric scanning (Fig.
2
B) and the relative affinity of each cold competitor DNA was calculated (Table
1
). Cold competitor DNAs with FIAU in the 3 or 5 position displayed the least relative affinity for binding to AP-1, 0.2 and <0.1, respectively. Cold competitor DNAs with FIAU in positions -1, 1 or 7 displayed intermediate affinities and substitution of
thymidine with FIAU at position -3 did not affect the affinity of the substituted oligonucleotide for AP-1.
Results of competition studies with FIAU-substituted cold competitor DNAs
Cold competitor
a
IC
90
b
Relative affinity
c
AP-1
3.45
1.0
-3F
2.93
1.2
-1F
11.90
0.3
1F
5.48
0.6
3F
22.88
0.2
5F
>24.00
<0.1
7F
6.44
0.5
a
For location of each FIAU substitution, see Figure 1A.
b
The amount of cold competitor (in fold molar excess) required to reduce AP-1 binding by 90%. The IC
90
values were determined by the method of Reed and Muench (1938).
c
Relative affinity was calculated by dividing the IC
90
of the AP-1 probe (3.45) by the IC
90
of each probe containing an FIAU substitution.
Effect of FIAU on TFIID binding
REFERENCES
1 Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K. and Harrison, S. C.(1992) Cell,71,1223-1237.
2 Angel, P., Imagawa, M., Chiu, R., Stein, B., Imbra, R. J., Rahmsdorf, H. J., Jonat, C., Herrlich, P. and Karin, M. (1987) Cell, 49,729-739.
3 Lee, W., Mitchell, P. and Tjian, R. (1987) Cell, 49,741-752.
4 Klig, L. S., Carey, J. and Yanofsky, C. (1988) J. Mol. Biol., 202, 769-777.
5 Pugh, B. F. and Tjian, R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 679-682.
6 Korba, B. E. and Gerin, J. L. (1992) Antiviral Res., 19,55-70.
7 Staschke, K. A., Colacino, J. M., Mabry, T. E. and Jones, C. D.(1994) Antiviral Res.23,45-61.
9 Grant, A. J., Feinberg, A., Chou, T.-C., Watanabe, K. A., Fox, J. J. and Philips, F. S. (1982) Biochem. Pharmacol., 31,1103-1108.
10 Chen, M. S., Van Nostrand, M. and Oshana, S. C. (1986) Anal. Biochem., 156,300-304.
11 Klecker, R. W., Katki, A. G. and Collins, J. M. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol., 46,1204-1209.
12 Cui, L., Yoon, S., Schinazi, R. F. and Sommadossi, J.-P. (1995) J. Clin. Invest., 95,555-563.
13 Colacino, J. M., Horn, J. W., Horn, D. M. and Richardson, F. C. (1996) Toxicology In Vitro 10, 297-303.
14 Richardson, F. C., Engelhardt, J. A. and Bowsher, R. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91,12003-12007.
15 Staschke, K. A. and Colacino, J. M. (1994) J. Virol., 68,8265-8269.
16 Bergstrom, D. E. and Swartling, D. J. (1988) In Liebman, J. F., Greenberg, A. and Dolbier, W. R. (eds), Fluorine-Containing Molecules: Structure, Reactivity, Synthesis, and Applications VCH, New York, pp. 259-308.
17 Richardson, F. C., Richardson, K. K., Kroin, J. S. and Hertel, L. W.(1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20,1763-1768.
19 Reed, L. J. and Muench, H. (1938) Am J. Hyg., 27, 493-497.
20 Peterson, M. G., Tanese, N., Pugh, B. F. and Tjian, R. (1990) Science248, 1625-1630.
21 Hoopes, B. C., LeBlanc, J. F. and Hawley, D. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem.267, 11539-11547.
22 Dunnett, C. W. (1980) J. Am. Stat. Assoc.75,789-795.
23 SAS Institute, Inc. (1992). The MIXED Procedure. In: SAS Technical Report P-229, SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements, Release 6.07, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, pp. 287-366.
24 Flint, O. P. (1994) Toxic. In Vitro, 8,677-683.
25 Huang, P., Chubb, S. and Plunkett, W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265,16617-16625.
26 Kufe, D. W., Major, P. P., Egan, E. M. and Beardsley, G. P. (1980) J. Biol. Chem., 255,8997-9000.
27 Risse, J., Jooss, K., Neuberg, M., Brüller, H.-J. and Müller, R. (1989) EMBO J.8,3825-3832.
28 Starr, D. B. and Hawley, D. K. (1991) Cell67, 1231-1240.
29 Pu, W. T. and Struhl, K. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res.20,771-775.
30 Singer, V. L., Wobbe, C. R. and Struhl, K. (1990) Genes Dev., 4, 636-645.
31 Ono, A. and Ueda, T. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res.15, 219-232.MEDLINE Abstract
32 Vosberg, H. P. and Eckstein, F. (1982) J. Biol. Chem.257, 6595-6599.
33 Bodnar, J. W., Zempsky, W., Warder, D., Bergson, C. and Ward, D. C. (1983) J. Biol. Chem.258,15206-15213.