Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (341K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawa, C
Right arrow Articles by Handa, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawa, C
Right arrow Articles by Handa, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 4954-4961

Footnote

Functional domains of transcription factor hGABP[beta]1/E4TF1-53 required for nuclear localization and transcription activation

Functional domains of transcription factor hGABP [beta]1/E4TF1-53 required for nuclear localization and transcription activation Chika Sawa, Masahide Goto, Fumihiko Suzuki, Hajime Watanabe, Jun-ichi Sawada and Hiroshi Handa*

Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan

Received August 13, 1996; Revised and Accepted October 31, 1996

ABSTRACT

Transcription factor E4TF1 is the human homolog of GABP and has been renamed hGABP (human GABP). hGABP is composed of two types of subunits; hGABP[beta]1/E4TF1-53 and the ets-related protein hGABP[alpha]/E4TF1-60. Both bind together to form an ([alpha])2([beta]1)2 heterotetrameric complex on DNA and activate transcription at specific promoters in vitro. Tetramer formation depends on two regions of hGABP[beta]1; the N-terminal region containing the Notch/ankyrin-type repeats is necessary for binding to hGABP[alpha] and the C-terminal region is necessary for homodimerization. In this report, we constructed various deletion mutants of hGABP[beta]1 in order to delimit the functional regions required for nuclear localization and transcription activity. We found that hGABP[beta]1 localization in the nucleus is dependent on a region located between amino acids 243 and 330 and that the presence of hGABP[beta]1 influences the efficiency of hGABP[alpha] transport into the nucleus. Next, we demonstrated that the hGABP complex composed of [alpha] and [beta]1 subunits activates transcription from the adenovirus early 4 promoter in vivo. This transcription activation needs the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1 and is consistent with results obtained with the in vitro assay. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis analysis of the C-terminal region reveals that the [alpha]-helix structure and the leucine residues are important for formation of a heterotetrameric complex with hGABP[alpha]in vitro and for transcription activation in vivo. These results suggest that hGABP[beta]1 stimulates transcription as part of a heterotetrameric complex with hGABP[alpha]in vivo.

INTRODUCTION

In eukaryotes, many gene-specific transcription factors regulate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. These transcription factors function cooperatively by forming large complexes with one another at promoter sequences. Within these complexes protein-protein interactions between DNA binding transcription factors and non-DNA binding transcription factors have been shown to be responsible in most instances for transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Small regions termed activation domains were found to interact with certain general transcription factors and/or co-activators and to be both necessary and sufficient for transcription activation.

Transcription factor E4TF1 was originally purified to homogeneity from HeLa cells on the basis of its ability to bind to and stimulate transcription from the adenovirus early 4 (E4) promoter (1 ,2 ). Further characterization of E4TF1 revealed the presence of two distinct subunits, an ets-related DNA binding protein, E4TF1-60, and a non-DNA binding factor, E4TF1-53. The N-terminal region of the latter contains four tandemly repeated motifs homologous to Notch/ankyrin. Both subunits interacted with one another to form the E4TF1 heterotetrameric complex (E4TF1-60)2(E4TF1-53)2 on the specific DNA sequence 5'-CGGAAGTG-3'. This was shown to result in efficient activation of transcription in vitro (2 -5 ). Another E4TF1 subunit, E4TF1-47, is identical to E4TF1-53 in the N-terminal region but contains a distinct C-terminal 15 amino acid sequence. It can complex with E4TF1-60 but the complex does not stimulate transcription in vitro as efficiently as E4TF1 complexes made up of E4TF1-53 (6 ). Sequence data of cDNA clones from a HeLa cDNA library showed that E4TF1-60, E4TF1-53 and E4TF1-47 are highly homologous to GABP[alpha], GABP[beta]1-1 and GABP[beta]1-2 respectively. For this reason, E4TF1 is thought to be the human homolog of rat GA binding protein (GABP), which was purified as a factor that binds to a cis-regulatory DNA sequence important for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) immediate early (IE) gene activation (8 -10 ,13 ). E4TF1 and its subunits have thus been renamed according to the human GABP nomenclature (hGABP). hGABP[alpha], hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[gamma]1 correspond to E4TF1-60, E4TF1-53 and E4TF1-47, as shown in Figure 1 A. The genes for the hGABP subunits, hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1, were mapped to human chromosomes 21.q21.2-q21.3 and 7.q11.21 respectively, while the genes for the mouse GABP subunits, GABP[alpha] and [beta], were mapped to mouse chromosomes 6 and 2 respectively (11 -13 ). Recently, the transcription factors EF-1A (14 ), NRF-2 (15 ), XrpFI (16 ), RBF-1 (17 ) and [beta] factor (18 ) have been found to be immunologically related to GABP. This is especially the case for the NRF-2 subunits [alpha], [beta]2 and [gamma]2, which are identical to hGABP[alpha], hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[gamma]1 respectively at the level of cDNA. The NRF-2 [beta]1 and [gamma]1 subunits are variants of [beta]2 and [gamma]2 possessing an additional 12 amino acid insertion (19 ). GABP has been shown to be involved in the expression of certain cellular genes, for instance the male-specific steroid 16[alpha]-hydroxylase gene (20 ) and the leukocyte-specific adhesion molecule CD18 ([beta]2 leukocyte integrin; 21 ).


Figure 1. (A) Schematic structures of hGABP subunits. The black region indicates the ets-related region and the stippled regions indicate four Notch/ankyrin-type repeats. Hatched regions indicate the hGABP[beta]-specific regions. Cross-hatched regions indicate the insertion of 12 amino acids in hGABP[beta]2 and hGABP[gamma]2. (B) Schematic structures of hGABP[beta]1 mutants. The regions surrounded by broken lines indicate the internal deletion region of hGABP[beta]1 mutants and the broad cross-hatched region indicates a nuclear localization signal derived from the SV40 large T antigen.

In this report, we demonstrate that an hGABP complex composed of hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1 can activate transcription in a transient transfection assay while an hGABP complex composed of hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[gamma]1 cannot. To gain further insights into the mechanism by which the non-DNA binding factor hGABP[beta]1 functions as a transcriptional activator in vivo, we undertook a structure-function analysis of hGABP[beta]1 to identify the domains involved in nuclear localization and transcription activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid construction

pET53 (6 ) was completely digested with SacI and partially digested with PstI to generate an 879 bp fragment that carries a partial cDNA of hGABP[beta]1. In order to generate plasmids pET[beta]1QK339GT and pET[beta]1GL341GT expressing [beta]1QK339GT and [beta]1GL341GT respectively (Fig. 4 ), the DNA fragments encoding the N-terminal flanking region of the mutants 339-N and 341-N were synthesized and annealed. The DNA fragments encoding the C-terminal flanking regions of the mutants were amplified using two primers, [beta]BamHI and 339-C or 341-C respectively. The PCR products were digested with KpnI and BamHI and purified using agarose gel electrophoresis. The two fragments above and the 879 bp fragment were inserted into the SacI and BamHI sites of pET53. To generate plasmids pET[beta]1KL369GT and pET[beta]1EA371GT expressing [beta]1KL369GT and [beta]1EA371GT, the DNA fragments encoding the C-terminal flanking regions of mutants 369-C and 371-C were synthesized and annealed. The DNA fragments encoding the N-terminal flanking regions of the mutants were amplified using two primers, [beta]sppstI and 369-N or 371-N respectively. The PCR products were digested with PstI and KpnI and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The two fragments above and the 879 bp fragment were inserted intothe SacI and BamHI sites of pET53. The other plasmids that express hGABP[beta] site-directed mutants in Escherichia coli were constructed as follows. The DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal flanking region of the mutant was amplified using two primers, Number-N and [beta]sppstI. The DNA fragment encoding the C-terminal flanking region was amplified by PCR using two primers, Number-C and [beta]sppstI. The PCR products were digested with KpnI and BamHI or PstI and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The two PCR fragments and the 879 bp fragmentwere inserted into the SacI and BamHI sites of pET53. The construction of hGABP[beta]1 deletion mutant expression vectors in E.coli was as described previously (7 ).

All plasmids that expressed hGABP[beta]1 mutants in Drosophila melanogaster Schneider line 2 (SL2) cells (22 ) were constructed as follows. pET[beta] mutants were digested with BamHI and BglII. The DNA fragments containing the region that codes for the hGABP[beta] mutants were subcloned into the BamHI site of A5C[Delta]P, which contains the Drosophila actin 5C promoter (23 ).

All plasmids that expressed mutant hGABP[beta]1 in COS-1 cells were constructed as follows. pET[beta] mutant plasmids were all digested with BamHI and BglII. The DNA fragments containing the coding regions of the corresponding mutants were subcloned into the BglII site of the mammalian expression vector pCAGGS (24 ).

The pET[beta]1I243/NLS/330 plasmid was constructed as follows. The C-terminal flanking region was amplified using two primers, [beta]BamHI and NLS-243, which contains the nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence of the SV40 large T antigen. The PCR product was digested with BamHI and PstI and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA fragment coding for a part of hGABP[beta] was prepared by digesting pET53 with SacI and PstI and purifying the DNA fragment by agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, the PCR product and the fragment produced by SacI and PstI digestion were subcloned into the SacI and BamHI sites of pET53. Next, to construct the expression vector for SL2 and COS-1 cells, pET[beta]1I243/NLS/330 was digested with BamHI and BglII and the fragment was subcloned into the BamHI site of A5C[Delta]P and the BglII site of the pCAGGS vector.

All synthesized oligonucleotides to construct the plasmids are shown in Table 2 .

Table 1 . The sequence of synthetic DNA fragments and PCR primers The table shows the data obtained from 30 transfected COS-1 cells. N, nucleus; N/C, nucleus and cytoplasm; C, cytoplasm.

All DNAs of hGABP[beta] mutants were sequenced using a 373A-18 sequencer with a fluorescence detection system (Applied Biosystems).

Immunofluorescence assay


Table 2 DNA fragment and PCR primer of sequenceTransfected COS-1 cells were placed onto a micro cover glass. The cells were washed twice with sterile PBS(-) and fixed in 3.7% formalin/PBS(-) for 10 min. The cells were washed with PBS(-) and 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS(-) was added for 10 min to permeabilize the cells. After blocking with 1% skimmed milk/PBS(-) for 10 min, the first antibody (anti-hGABP monoclonal antibody) was added for 1 h. The monoclonal antibodies were 3A4G7G3H11 and 4F3HF12E12, directed against hGABP[beta], and 5B8A12D7C12, directed against hGABP[alpha]. The cells were washed with 0.1% NP-40/PBS(-) three times for 5 min with agitation, followed by treatment with 5 [mu]g/ml TRITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Chemicon) for 20 min in a dark box. They were subsequently washed with 0.1% NP-40/PBS(-) three times for 5 min with agitation. Cells were stained with 0.1 mg/ml diaminophenolindole (DAPI) for 5 min and washed twice with PBS(-) and mounted in 90% glycerol, 10 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine, 50 mM Na2CO3-NaHCO3, pH 8.0. Samples were examined and photographed using a Carl Zeiss microscope equipped for fluorescence photomicroscopy and a Fuji NEOPAN 400. All procedures were carried out at room temperature.

Cell maintenance and transfection

SL2 cells were maintained in tissue culture flasks containing Schneider's Drosophila Medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate and 50 U/ml penicillin G. At 2-3 h before transfection, the cells were replated onto 60 mm polystyrene dishes at a density of 3 * 106 cells/5 ml medium/dish. Transfections were carried out by the calcium phosphate method (25 ). The cells received variable amounts of hGABP expression vectors, the luciferase reporter vector, the [beta]-galactosidase vector and A5C[Delta]P DNA, so that the total concentration of DNA was 12 [mu]g/dish. After addition of DNA, cells were incubated at 27oC and left undisturbed until the time of harvest 40 h later.

COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% FBS. Transfections were carried out by electroporation. A total of 6 [mu]g DNA was transfected into a volume of 250 ml containing ~1 * 106 cells using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser set at 220 V and 960 [mu]F. The width of the cuvette was 0.4 cm. Transfected cells were plated onto a micro cover glass in a 60 mm tissue culture dish containing 5 ml medium and the dishes were incubated at 37oC with 5% CO2 until harvesting 40 h later.

Luciferase and [beta]-galactosidase assays

Cell extracts were prepared as follows. Transfected SL2 cells grown in 60 mm dishes were washed three times with PBS(-) and then lysed by the addition of 400 ml cell lysis buffer (Toyo-ink PGK-L-500). Cell lysates were collected in 1.5 ml tubes and centrifuged at 12 000 g for 5 min at 4oC. The supernatant of the cell lysate was diluted 1:10 in cell lysis buffer containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin fraction V. For the luciferase assay, 20 ml diluted cell lysate were mixed with 100 ml luminescence reagent (Toyo-ink) and luciferase activity was measured in a Lumat LB 9501 luminometer (Berthod). For the [beta]-galactosidase assay, 20 ml diluted cell lysate were mixed with 500 ml buffer Z (10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M NaHPO4-Na2HPO4, pH 7.5) and 5 ml chlorophenyl red [beta]-D- galactopyranoside (Boehringer Mannheim) and then incubated at 30oC for ~20 min. The absorbency of each sample was measured at 574 nm. The luciferase activity in each assay was standardized against the corresponding [beta]-galactosidase activity.

Western blotting assay

The cell lysates were loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels. After electrophoresis proteins were transferred to immobilon transfer membranes (Millipore) and the hGABP protein was detected using a blotting detection kit for mouse antibodies (Amersham) and the monoclonal antibody anti-hGABP antibody.

Expression and purification of hGABP subunit polypeptides

Proteins were expressed in E.coli BL21(DE3). Purification and renaturation of hGABP subunits and hGABP[beta]1 mutant polypeptides were performed as previously described (6 ). The concentration of each renatured protein was determined by silver staining of SDS-PAGE gels.

Gel shift assay

Gel shift assays were performed as previously described (2 ) except that gel electrophoresis was carried out at 4oC. The DNA probe for this assay contained a single hGABP recognition site and was prepared as previously described (7 ). About 1 ng DNA probe was used for the binding reactions.

RESULTS

Nuclear localization of hGABP

We isolated two cDNA clones coding for the two newly described subunits of hGABP (19 ). They contain an additional 12 amino acid insertion into hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[gamma]1. These subunits have therefore been termed hGABP[beta]2 and hGABP[gamma]2, as indicated in Figure 1 A.

Before examining the transcription activation domain of the hGABP complex, it was essential first of all to identify the region of the hGABP complex required for transport into the nucleus. We constructed expression vectors of hGABP[alpha], [beta]1, [gamma]1 and the various hGABP[beta]1 mutant constructs (Fig. 1 ) and transfected them into COS-1 cells. Their location in the cell was detected by an immunofluorescent assay using specific monoclonal antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. hGABP[alpha] was found to be localized in the entire cell when expressed alone (Fig. 2 a and s). However, hGABP[alpha] became localized in the nucleus upon co-transfection with the expression vectors for hGABP[beta]1 or hGABP[gamma]1 (Fig. 2 b and c). On the other hand, full-length hGABP[beta]1 was observed only in the nucleus, whether expressed alone or co-expressed with hGABP[alpha] (Fig. 2 j and k).


Figure 2. Localization of full-length of hGABP subunits and various mutants of hGABP[beta]1. Localization analysis was performed by immunofluorescence assay. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors of (a, s) hGABP[alpha], (j) hGABP[beta]1, (b, k) hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1, (c, l) hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[gamma]1, (d, m) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1N133, (e, n) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1C332, (f, o) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1N236, (g, p) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1I153/263, (h, q, t) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1I243/330, (i, r) hGABP[alpha] and [beta]1I243/NLS/330. Staining of the cells in (a)-(i) and (j)-(r) was with anti-hGABP[alpha] antibody and anti-hGABP[beta] antibody respectively. Cells in (s) and (t) were counter stained with the DNA-specific dye DAPI to visualize the position of nuclei in the same cells shown in (a) and (q) respectively.

Deletion of the N-terminal amino acids of hGABP[beta]1 in [beta]1N133 and [beta]1N236, as well as deletion of an internal sequence in [beta]1I153/267, did not affect nuclear localization (Fig. 2 m, o and q). Likewise, deletion of the C-terminal amino acids in [beta]1C332 did not affect its nuclear localization (Fig. 2 n). However, the [beta]1I243/330 mutant protein was detected only in the cytoplasm, regardless of expression of hGABP[alpha] (Fig. 2 h, q and t). These results (summarized on Table 1 ) demonstrate that the hGABP complex composed of hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1 is localized in the nucleus and that nuclear localization depends on a region of hGABP[beta]1 situated between amino acids 268 and 330.

Transcription activation by hGABP in vivo

To examine whether the hGABP complex can stimulate transcription in vivo, we carried out transient transfection assays with D.melanogaster SL2 cells (22 ) as described in Material and Methods. We chose these cells because they are highly responsive to exogenous transcription factors, in contrast to mammalian cells (26 ,27 ). The luciferase reporter plasmid used in these experiments contains an intact (-324 to +39) adenovirus E4 promoter (Fig. 3 A). As shown in Figure 3 B, no activation was observed when each subunit was present alone (lanes 2-4), consistent with our previous results in vitro (2 ). However, strong activation of transcription from the E4 promoter was observed when hGABP[alpha] was co-expressed with increasing amounts of hGABP[beta]1 or [beta]2 (Fig. 3 B, lanes 7-12). In this assay, hGABP[beta]1 was more efficient in activation of transcription compared with hGABP[beta]2. This was not due to differences in the amount of expressed protein, as demonstrated by a quantitative Western blot assay (data not shown). On the other hand, transcription activation was not observed when hGABP[alpha] was co-expressed with hGABP[gamma]1 or [gamma]2. These results indicate that the hGABP complexes composed of hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1 or hGABP[beta]2 are transcriptional activators and that transcription activation requires the non-DNA binding hGABP[beta]1 or [beta]2 subunits, but not the hGABP[gamma]1 or [gamma]2 subunits.


Figure 3. hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[beta]2 activate transcription from the adenovirus E4 promoter with hGABP[alpha] in SL2 cells. (A) A schematic diagram of the adenovirus E4 promoter (from -324 to +39) of the reporter plasmid pE4-luciferase. This promoter was linked to the luciferase gene in the reporter plasmid. (B) SL2 cells were transfected with 2 [mu]g pE4-luciferase, 1 [mu]g [beta]-galactosidase vector and various amounts ([mu]g) of expression vector as indicated below. The cells were harvested 40 h after transfection. Luciferase activities were determined and standardized for [beta]-galactosidase activities. (C) Aliquots of 3 [mu]g of various hGABP[beta]1 mutants were used to transfect SL2 cells along with 2 [mu]g pE4-luciferase and 3 [mu]g hGABP[alpha] expression vector. Forty hours later, the cells were lysed and luciferase activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods.


Figure 4. Schematic structures of hGABP[beta]1 mutants with substitutions of two sequential amino acids within the hGABP[beta]-specific region. The names and the substitution sites of hGABP[beta]1 mutants are illustrated. The detailed amino acid sequence in the hypothetical leucine zipper structure of wild-type hGABP[beta]1 is represented at the top. The amino acid sequence glycine-threonine replaces the substitution sites indicated by open squares. Leucines and alanines within the hydrophobic phase in the hypothetical leucine zipper structure and the mutants containing substitutions for the amino acids are shown by an asterisk (*).

Analysis of the transcription activation domain of hGABP[beta]1

To analyze further the region of hGABP[beta]1 necessary for transcription activation from the E4 promoter in vivo, a series of expression vectors containing deletions in hGABP[beta]1 (Fig. 1 B) were examined by transient transfection assay. The level of expression was determined by Western blot assay and transcriptional activity was measured by luciferase assay. As shown in Figure 2 C, none of the deletion mutants could stimulate transcription in the presence of hGABP[alpha], even though these truncated molecules were expressed at levels comparable with that of full-length hGABP[beta]1 (data not shown). Previously, a gel shift assay showed that the N-terminal deletion mutant [beta]1N133 could not bind hGABP[alpha] and that the C-terminal deletion mutants [beta]1C248 and [beta]1C332 could bind hGABP[alpha] but could not form heterotetrameric complexes functional in transcription activation in vitro. Note that the internal deletion mutant [beta]1I153/267 could not stimulate transcription in this assay, although it showed a slight capacity to stimulate transcription activation in vitro (7 ).

Co-expression of hGABP[alpha] with [beta]1I243/NLS/330, which has a NLS derived from the SV40 large T antigen inserted into the deletion region of [beta]1I243/330 (Fig. 1 B), resulted in a ~10-fold increase in luciferase activity compared with the expression vector containing no hGABP[beta] or [beta]1I243/330 construct cDNA (Fig. 4 , lanes 1 and 4). This NLS-fused mutant was observed only in the nucleus by immunofluorescence assay (Fig. 2 r). These results suggest that the C-terminal sequence (amino acids 330-353) of hGABP[beta]1 is required for hGABP-induced transcription activation in vivo and that transcription activation is relatively independent of amino acids 243-330, which are necessary for nuclear localization of the hGABP complex.

Site-directed mutagenic analysis of the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1

The results above indicate that the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1 (amino acids 330-353) is important for transcription activation in vivo, which is consistent with previous in vitro data (7 ). This leads to the conclusion that this region is important for both heterotetrameric complex formation and transcription activation by hGABP. To further dissect the functional domains in this region, we carried out site-directed mutagenesis. In vitro analysis revealed that this region has homodimerization activity (7 ,13 ). Besides, it is free of [alpha]-helix destabilizing residues and has a hydrophobic phase composed of leucine and alanine residues when displayed on an idealized [alpha]-helix projection. Therefore, it may function as a leucine-zipper structure for homodimerization (28 ,29 ). We systematically constructed a series of vectors expressing hGABP[beta]1 mutants having two sequential amino acids substituted by the [alpha]-helix destabilizing residues glycine and threonine within this region (Fig. 4 ). These substitution mutants were expressed in E.coli and purified as described in Materials and Methods. Their capacity to form heterotetramers with hGABP[alpha] was examined by gel shift assay, as shown in Figure 5 . Although [beta]1QK339GT (lanes 1-3) and [beta]1EA371GT (lanes 49-51) could form a heterotetramer with hGABP[alpha] as efficiently as wild-type hGABP[beta]1 (lanes 52 and 53), other mutants and especially those that contained a mutations within the hydrophobic phase of the hypothetical [alpha]-helix structure, such as [beta]1AN345GT (lanes 10-12), [beta]1KY351GT (lanes 19-21) and [beta]1KE359GT (lanes 31-33), could not form a heterotetrameric complex with hGABP[alpha] efficiently. Three leucine-defective mutants, [beta]1GL341GT (lanes 4-6), [beta]1QL355GT (lanes 26-27) and [beta]1KL369GT (lanes 46-48), all failed to form the heterotetrameric complex, but two alanine-defective mutants, [beta]1AQ349GT (lanes 16-18) and [beta]1AE363GT (lanes 37-39), could form the complex, albeit less efficiently than wild-type hGABP[beta]1. These results suggest that amino acids 341-369 are important for formation of the hGABP heterotetrameric complex. Also, it seems possible that this region forms an [alpha]-helix structure and that the three leucine residues are part of a leucine zipper structure necessary for homodimerization.


Figure 5. hGABP tetramerization activity of the substitution mutants of hGABP[beta]1 in the presence of hGABP[alpha]. The gel shift assay was performed using various hGABP[beta]1 mutants as indicated above. 10 ng hGABP[alpha] and 1 ng radiolabeled DNA probe containing the E4 promoter (-29 to -182) were incubated with 3-fold incremental additions (3, 10 and 30 ng) of the mutants [beta]1QK339GT (lanes 1-3), [beta]1QL341GT (lanes 4-6), [beta]1DE343GT (lanes 7-9), [beta]1AN345GT (lanes 10-12), [beta]1RE347GT (lanes 13-15), [beta]1AQ349GT (lanes 16-18), [beta]1KY351GT (lanes 19-21), [beta]1RQ353GT (lanes 22-24), [beta]1QL355GT (lanes 25-27), [beta]1LK357GT (lanes 28-30), [beta]1KE359GT (lanes 31-33), [beta]1QE361GT (lanes 34-36), [beta]1AE363GT (lanes 37-39), [beta]1AY365GT (lanes 40-42), [beta]1RQ367GT (lanes 43-45), [beta]1KL369GT (lanes 46-48) or [beta]1EA371GT (lanes 49-51) and 2-fold incremental additions (3 and 10 ng) of wild-type hGABP[beta]1 (lanes 52-53).


Figure 6. Comparison of the potential transcriptional activities of the wild-type and substitution mutants of hGABP[beta]1. Aliquots of 3 [mu]g expression vectors carrying the different substitution mutants of hGABP[beta]1 were transfected into SL2 cells, along with 2 [mu]g reporter plasmid pE4-luciferase and 3 [mu]g hGABP[alpha] expression vector. Forty hours later, the cells were lysed and the luciferase activities were determined as described in Materials and Methods.

Next, in order to study the relationship between hGABP tetrameric complex formation and transcription activation by hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[beta]1, we examined some of these mutants for their activity in the transient transfection assay. The results are shown in Figure 6 . An ~20-fold activation of transcription was observed when [beta]1QK339GT (lane 3) or [beta]1EA371GT (lane 10) was co-expressed with hGABP[alpha]. These two mutants could form a tetramer as efficiently as wild-type hGABP[beta]1, as measured by gel shift assay. Mutants with a reduced capacity to tetramerize with hGABP[alpha], such as [beta]1AQ349GT (lane 5), [beta]1LK357GT (lane 7) and [beta]1AE363GT (lane 8), were severely impaired in their ability to stimulate transcription. These results indicate that it is difficult to functionally separate the regions responsible for tetrameric complex formation and transcription activation and that in vivo the activities of these two regions are intimately linked.

DISCUSSION

The studies reported here further extend our understanding of the relationship between structure and function in hGABP[beta]1 (summarized in Fig. 7 ). The identification of two functional regions in hGABP[beta]1 was previously indicated by in vitro analysis (7 ). The N-terminal region containing four tandem repeats with homology to Notch/ankyrin was shown to be required for binding to hGABP[alpha]. The C-terminal region containing the leucine zipper-like motif was found to be responsible for transcription activation and homodimerization. Here, we identify a new functional region necessary for nuclear localization of hGABP[beta]1 and show that this region is also necessary for efficient nuclear localization of hGABP[alpha]. Also, we have extended our study of the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1 by identifying key amino acids necessary for both stimulation of transcription and homodimerization. This further underlines the coincidental nature of these two activities within the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1.


Figure 7.Summary of the functional domains of hGABP[beta]1. Stippled region represents four tamdem repeats of a Notch/ankyrin motif required for heterodimer formation with hGABP[alpha]. The hatched region represents a leucine zipper-like structure. This domain is necessary for homodimerization, which activity is critical for transcription activation. The underlined region (amino acids 243-317) is expected to play an important role in nuclear localization.

A nuclear factor hGABP

Transcription factors must be able to enter and become localized in the nucleus. This ability has been shown to depend on short regions termed NLS (30 ,31 ). In this report, hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[gamma]1 were shown to be localized predominantly in the nucleus regardless of the presence of hGABP[alpha]. Mutational studies revealed that hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[gamma]1 contain an NLS in the amino acid sequence 243-330. This region is not necessary for the transcriptional activity of hGABP. Further analyses will be necessary to further delimit the minimal sequence necessary and sufficient for nuclear localization. We speculate that the PPAKR sequence (amino acids 313-317) and the neighboring region may play an important role, because NLSs have been reported to be rich in proline and basic amino acids (31 ).

hGABP[alpha] alone was not able to direct nuclear localization efficiently. This absolutely required the concomitant expression of either hGABP[beta] or hGABP[gamma]. It is possible that hGABP[beta] or hGABP[gamma] bind hGABP[alpha] in the cytoplasm to assist hGABP[alpha] transport into the nucleus. This is different from the case of other ets-related proteins, ETS-1 and ER81, whose ETS domains alone are sufficient for nuclear localization (32 ,33 ). There may be a mechanism that inhibits hGABP[alpha] entry into the nucleus. hGABP[alpha] may only succeed in so doing on forming a complex with its partner protein hGABP[beta] or hGABP[gamma].

The homodimerization domain of hGABP[beta]1

hGABP[beta]1 has homodimerization activity in its C-terminal region, as shown by an in vitro analysis (7 ). Here, we have shown that this region is located between amino acids 341 and 371 of hGABP[beta]1 and that this region probably adopts an [alpha]-helix structure in which three leucine residues play an important role in homodimerization. Consistent with our observations, de la Brousse reported that this dimerization domain could functionally replace the leucine zipper of the b-ZIP transcription factor C/EBP and that it exists predominantly as an [alpha]-helical structure, as shown by CD spectroscopic studies (13 ). Therefore, this region is suggested to mediate homodimerization via the three leucine residues, which probably adopt a leucine zipper structure.

The transcription activation domain within hGABP[beta]1

We have demonstrated that each of the hGABP subunits alone fails to stimulate transcription in vivo, consistent with our previous report obtained by in vitro analysis (2 ,6 ). However, hGABP[beta]1 stimulates transcription from the adenovirus E4 promoter in the presence of hGABP[alpha]. Furthermore, hGABP[beta]1 and hGABP[beta]2 were found to differ by ~2-fold in their capacity to activate transcription. It seems that the inserted amino acid sequence present in hGABP[beta]2 plays a role in inhibiting transcription activity in this assay. As this region is rich in serine residues, there exists the possibility that phosphorylation of at least some of these serine residues may regulate transcription activation activity. hGABP[gamma] was found to have no influence on basal transcription in the presence hGABP[alpha]. As this is inconsistent with the results obtained in the in vitro assay (6 ), some unknown cellular factors could function cooperatively with the complex composed of hGABP[alpha] and hGABP[gamma].

Our deletion mutational studies of hGABP[beta]1 demonstrated that its C-terminal region was necessary for transcription activation in vivo, consistent with our previous report obtained by in vitro analysis (7 ). This region coincides with the homodimerization domain. Furthermore, substitution mutational studies of the C-terminal region of hGABP[beta]1 revealed that the amino acids important for homodimerization were also required for full transcription activation. This indicates that the dimerization structure of this region is critical for transcription activation.

Gugneja et al. reported that the [beta] and [gamma] subunits of NFR-2, which are identical to hGABP[beta] and hGABP[gamma] respectively, have the same transcriptional activity when fused with the GAL4 DNA binding domain as measured using the transient transfection assay. They also reported that the transactivation domains are located in the repeated glutamine-containing hydrophobic clusters (19 ). However, we have observed that hGABP[gamma] does not mediate transcription activation in the presence of hGABP[alpha]. Also, the repeated glutamine-containing hydrophobic clusters would not appear to always be essential for transcription activation, as the hGABP[beta] mutant [beta]1I243/NLS/330 lacks this region. One explanation for this discrepancy is that dimerization is required because both the GAL4 DNA binding domain and hGABP[beta] exist as homodimers on their respective promoter DNAs in these assays. Also, it is possible that the region necessary for transcription activation extends from the repeated glutamine-containing hydrophobic clusters to the C-terminal region. This would explain why the mutant [beta]1I243/NLS/330 possesses only one third of the transcription stimulatory activity of the wild-type. The expanded region may interact with the transcriptional apparatus, some general transcription factors and/or a bridging factor between the pre-initiation complex and the hGABP complex.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The contribution of M.Ikeda and K.Tamai to the production of monoclonal antibodies against hGABP[alpha] and [beta] is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr J.-i.Inoue for the gift of SL2 cells and SL2 expression vectors. We also thank Dr S.-i.Hisanaga for technical advice on DAPI staining. We are grateful to Drs T.Wada and T.Imai for helpful discussions and M.Usui for reviewing the manuscript. This work was supported by Research Fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.

REFERENCES

1 Watanabe,H., Imai,T., Sharp,P.A. and Handa,H. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol., 8, 1290-1300. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Watanabe,H., Wada,T. and Handa,H. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 841-847. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Breeden,L. and Nasmyth,K. (1987) Nature, 329, 651. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Lux,S.E., John,K.M. and Bennett,V. (1990) Nature, 344, 36-42. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Wasylyk,B., Hahn,S.L. and Giovane,A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem., 211, 7-18. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Watanabe,H., Sawada,J.-i., Yano,K., Yamaguchi,K., Goto,M. and Handa,H. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 1385-1391. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Sawada,J.-i., Goto,M., Sawa,C., Watanabe,H. and Handa,H. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 1396-1402. MEDLINE Abstract

8 LaMarco,K.L. and McKnight,S.L. (1989) Genes Dev., 3, 1372-1383. MEDLINE Abstract

9 LaMarco,K.L., Thompson,C.C., Byers,B.P., Walton,E.M. and McKnight,S.L. (1991) Science, 253, 789-792.

10 Thompson,C.C., Brown,T.A. and McKnight,S.L. (1991) Science, 253, 762-768. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Sawada,J.-i., Goto,M., Watanabe,H., Handa,H. and Yoshida,M.C. (1995) Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 86, 10-12. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Goto,M., Shimizu,T., Sawada,J.-i., Sawa,C., Watanabe,H., Ichikawa,H., Ohira,M., Ohki,M. and Handa,H. (1995) Gene, 166, 337-338. MEDLINE Abstract

13 De la Brousse,F.C., Birkenmeier,E.H., King,D.S., Rowe,L.B. and McKnight,S.L. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 1853-1865. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Bolwig,G.M., Bruder,J.T. and Hearing,P. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 6555-6564. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Virbasius,J.V., Virbasiu,C.A. and Scarpulla,R.C. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 380-392. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Marchioni,M., Morabito,S., Salvati,A.L., Beccari,E. and Carnevali,F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 6479-6489. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Savoysky,E., Mizuno,T., Sowa,Y., Watanabe,H., Sawada,J.-i., Nomura,H., Ohsugi,Y., Handa,H. and Sakai,T. (1994) Oncogene, 9, 1839-1846. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Yoganathan,T., Bhat,N.K. and Sells,B.H. (1992) Biochem. J., 287, 349-353. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Gugneja,S., Virbasius,J.V. and Scarpulla,R.C. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 102-111. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Yokomori,N., Kobayashi,R., Moore,R., Sueyoshi,T. and Negishi,M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 5355-5362. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Rosmarin,A.G., Caprio,D.G., Kirsch,D.G., Handa,H. and Simkevich,C.P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 23627-23633. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Schneider,I. (1972) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 27,353-365. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Thummel,C.S., Boulet,A.M. and Lipshits,H.D. (1988) Gene, 74, 445-456. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Nima,H., Yamamura,K.-i. and Miyazaki,J.-i. (1991) Gene, 108, 193-200.

25 Chen,C.A. and Okayama,H. (1988) Biotechniques, 6, 632-638. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Courey,A.J. and Tjian,R. (1988) Cell, 55, 887-898. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Thanos,D. and Maniatis,T. (1995) Cell, 83, 1091-1100. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Landschuiz,W.H., Johnson,P.F. and Mcknight,S.L. (1988) Science, 240, 1759-1764.

29 O'Shea,E.K., Klemm,J.D., Kim,P.S. and Alber,T. (1991) Science, 254, 539-544. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Roberts,B. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1008, 263-280. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Vandromme,M., Rouvière,C.G., Lamb,N. and Fernandez,A. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci., 21, 59-64. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Boulukus,K.E., Pognonec,P., Rabault,B., Bouque,A. and Ghysdael,J. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol., 9, 5718-5721.

33 Janknecht,R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 1550-1556. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 45 924 5797; Fax: +81 45 923 0380; Email: hhanda@bio.titech.ac.jp
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H.-H. Xue, X. Jing, J. Bollenbacher-Reilley, D.-M. Zhao, J. S. Haring, B. Yang, C. Liu, G. A. Bishop, J. T. Harty, and W. J. Leonard
Targeting the GA Binding Protein {beta}1L Isoform Does Not Perturb Lymphocyte Development and Function
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2008; 28(13): 4300 - 4309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Zhang, M. Tuzova, Z.-X. J. Xiao, W. W. Cruikshank, and D. M. Center
Pro-IL-16 Recruits Histone Deacetylase 3 to the Skp2 Core Promoter through Interaction with Transcription Factor GABP
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 402 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Jaworski, C. L. Smith, and S. J. Burden
GA-Binding Protein Is Dispensable for Neuromuscular Synapse Formation and Synapse-Specific Gene Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2007; 27(13): 5040 - 5046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. T. Smith, R. D. Nicholls, and D. Reines
The gene encoding the fragile X RNA-binding protein is controlled by nuclear respiratory factor 2 and the CREB family of transcription factors
Nucleic Acids Res., February 25, 2006; 34(4): 1205 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Shimokawa and C. Ra
C/EBP{alpha} functionally and physically interacts with GABP to activate the human myeloid IgA Fc receptor (Fc{alpha}R, CD89) gene promoter
Blood, October 1, 2005; 106(7): 2534 - 2542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
S. Delehouzee, T. Yoshikawa, C. Sawa, J.-i. Sawada, T. Ito, M. Omori, T. Wada, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kabe, and H. Handa
GABP, HCF-1 and YY1 are involved in Rb gene expression during myogenesis
Genes Cells, July 1, 2005; 10(7): 717 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Sunesen, M. Huchet-Dymanus, M. O. Christensen, and J.-P. Changeux
Phosphorylation-Elicited Quaternary Changes of GA Binding Protein in Transcriptional Activation
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 8008 - 8018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Sawa, T. Yoshikawa, F. Matsuda-Suzuki, S. Delehouzee, M. Goto, H. Watanabe, J.-i. Sawada, K. Kataoka, and H. Handa
YEAF1/RYBP and YAF-2 Are Functionally Distinct Members of a Cofactor Family for the YY1 and E4TF1/hGABP Transcription Factors
J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22484 - 22490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Hauck, R. G. Kaba, M. Lipp, R. Dietz, and R. von Harsdorf
Regulation of E2F1-Dependent Gene Transcription and Apoptosis by the ETS-Related Transcription Factor GABP{gamma}1
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2147 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Tanaka, A. Ueda, H. Kanamori, H. Ideguchi, J. Yang, S. Kitajima, and Y. Ishigatsubo
Cell-cycle-dependent Regulation of Human aurora A Transcription Is Mediated by Periodic Repression of E4TF1
J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2002; 277(12): 10719 - 10726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Morii, H. Ogihara, K. Oboki, C. Sawa, T. Sakuma, S. Nomura, J. D. Esko, H. Handa, and Y. Kitamura
Inhibitory effect of the mi transcription factor encoded by the mutant mi allele on GA binding protein-mediated transcript expression in mouse mast cells
Blood, May 15, 2001; 97(10): 3032 - 3039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Briguet and M. A. Ruegg
The Ets Transcription Factor GABP Is Required for Postsynaptic Differentiation In Vivo
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2000; 20(16): 5989 - 5996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Chinenov, M. Henzl, and M. E. Martin
The alpha and beta Subunits of the GA-binding Protein Form a Stable Heterodimer in Solution. REVISED MODEL OF HETEROTETRAMERIC COMPLEX ASSEMBLY
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7749 - 7756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-i. Sawada, N. Simizu, F. Suzuki, C. Sawa, M. Goto, M. Hasegawa, T. Imai, H. Watanabe, and H. Handa
Synergistic Transcriptional Activation by hGABP and Select Members of the Activation Transcription Factor/cAMP Response Element-binding Protein Family
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 1999; 274(50): 35475 - 35482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Hoque, K.-i. Ishizu, A. Matsumoto, S.-I. Han, F. Arisaka, M. Takayama, K. Suzuki, K. Kato, T. Kanda, H. Watanabe, et al.
Nuclear Transport of the Major Capsid Protein Is Essential for Adeno-Associated Virus Capsid Formation
J. Virol., September 1, 1999; 73(9): 7912 - 7915.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Yamaguchi, T. Wada, D. Watanabe, T. Takagi, J. Hasegawa, and H. Handa
Structure and Function of the Human Transcription Elongation Factor DSIF
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 8085 - 8092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Suzuki, M. Goto, C. Sawa, S. Ito, H. Watanabe, J.-i. Sawada, and H. Handa
Functional Interactions of Transcription Factor Human GA-binding Protein Subunits
J. Biol. Chem., November 6, 1998; 273(45): 29302 - 29308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. F. Smith Jr., V. S. Carl, T. Lodie, and M. J. Fenton
Secretory Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Gene Expression Requires both a PU.1 and a Novel Composite NF-kappa B/PU.1/ GA-binding Protein Binding Site
J. Biol. Chem., September 11, 1998; 273(37): 24272 - 24279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Vassias, U. Hazan, Y. Michel, C. Sawa, H. Handa, L. Gouya, and F. Morinet
Regulation of Human B19 Parvovirus Promoter Expression by hGABP (E4TF1) Transcription Factor
J. Biol. Chem., April 3, 1998; 273(14): 8287 - 8293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (341K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawa, C
Right arrow Articles by Handa, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawa, C
Right arrow Articles by Handa, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?