Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (84K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (67)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 760-766

Footnote

Antisense oligonucleotides containing an internal, non-nucleotide-based linker promote site-specific cleavage of RNA

Antisense oligonucleotides containing an internal, non-nucleotide-based linker promote site-specific cleavage of RNA Mark A. Reynolds , Terry A. Beck , Philip B. Say , David A. Schwartz , Brian P. Dwyer , William J. Daily , Morteza M. Vaghefi , Michael D. Metzler , Robert E. Klem and Lyle J. Arnold Jr*

Genta Inc., 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego , CA 92121, USA

Received September 5, 1995 ; Revised and Accepted December 15, 1995

ABSTRACT

We have designed and synthesized a series of novel antisense methylphosphonate oligonucleotide (MPO) cleaving agents that promote site-specific cleavage on a complementary RNA target. These MPOs contain a non-nucleotide-based linking moiety near the middle of the sequence in place of one of the nucleotide bases. The region surrounding the unpaired base on the RNA strand (i.e. the one directly opposite the non-nucleotide-linker) is sensitive to hydrolytic cleavage catalyzed by ethylenediamine hydrochloride. Furthermore, the regions of the RNA comprising hydrogen bonded domains are resistant to cleavage compared with single-stranded RNA alone. Several catalytic moieties capable of supporting acid/base hydrolysis were coupled to the non-nucleotide-based linker via simple aqueous coupling chemistries. When tethered to the MPO in this manner these moieties are shown to catalyze site-specific cleavage on the RNA target without any additional catalyst.

INTRODUCTION

Antisense oligonucleotides have received considerable attention for their ability to modulate gene expression. A wide variety of backbone modifications have been developed with the intention of providing metabolically stable oligonucleotide analogs for in vivo applications. Yet, with the exception of the phosphorothioates and phosphorodithioates, none of these analogs has been found to activate ribonuclease H (RNase H), an endogenous enzyme that cleaves mRNA at the site of a DNA/RNA heteroduplex ( 1 , 2 ). This has proved to be a disappointment, since recent studies have shown that unmodified oligonucleotides act predominantly through an RNase H cleavage mode ( 3 - 5 ). One way to remedy this deficiency is to insert short stretches of phosphodiester or phosphorothioate DNA into an otherwise nuclease-stable backbone ( 6 , 7 ). Alternatively, a number of investigators have focused on the development of synthetic ribonuclease mimics (artificial ribonucleases) that can be covalently attached to an oligonucleotide and thereby promote a cleavage reaction on its RNA target ( 8 - 15 ).

One of the apparent shortcomings of previously described artificial ribonucleases is that they are unable to bind and distort the RNA strand into a preferred geometry for cleavage. For example, bovine RNase A binds RNA-like substrates in a non-helical conformation wherein the bases on either side of the bond that is cleaved point away from each other ( 16 ). Helical RNA is known to be resistant to hydrolytic cleavage compared with single-stranded RNA. This appears to be an intrinsic property of the 3'-5' linkage, which has been shown to be ~900 times more resistant to hydrolysis in double-stranded RNA compared with a 2'-5' linkage ( 17 ). Considering such evidence, we reasoned that the base stacking that occurs within and around an antisense heteroduplex would render the RNA strand less susceptible to cleavage by artificial nucleases. Further, we assumed that the rotation of a single base on the RNA strand outward from a stacked helical geometry would position its 2'-hydroxyl in a spatial orientation analogous to the 3'-hydroxyl in a duplex containing a 2'-5' linkage (cited above). Therefore, we considered replacing one of the bases in the antisense strand with a non-complementary, non-nucleotide-based linker ( 18 ).

Here we describe a heteroduplex motif employing a non-complementary, non-nucleotide-based linker within an antisense methylphosphonate oligonucleotide (MPO) strand that accelerates the rate of hydrolytic cleavage on its RNA target in a site-specific manner. We also report that certain simple catalytic moieties covalently linked to the antisense strand are capable of cleaving the RNA strand in this motif.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Synthesis of catalytic cleaver moieties for conjugation onto alkylamino linker-modified oligonucleotides (Fig. 1a)

1 H NMR spectra were obtained on a 300 MHz Bruker ARX 300 Spectrometer. All 1 H NMR results were obtained in CDCl 3 unless otherwise indicated. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Mattson Galaxy Series FTIR 3000 spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on a Fisons Trio 2000 Spectrometer and provided by JBL Scientific (San Luis Obispo, CA). Melting points are uncorrected. t-Butyl pent-4-enoate ( 1 ). A solution of 4-pentenoic acid (10 g) in t-butyl acetate (120 ml) was treated with perchloric acid (4 drops) and stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of aqueous saturated sodium bicarbonate (100 ml) and stirred for 15 min. The phases were separated and the organic phase was further washed with sodium bicarbonate solution, dried over anhydrous MgSO 4 , filtered and concentrated. The resulting crude product was purified by vacuum distillation: b.p. 51-55oC/20 torr (lit. 51-53oC/20 torr; 19 ); yield 6.4 g. t-Butyl 4,5-dihydroxypentanoate ( 2 ). To a solution of N -methylmorpholine oxide (2.50 g, 1.1 eq.), acetone (3 ml) and water (8 ml) was added a solution of osmium tetroxide (20 mg) in t-butanol (1.5 ml) followed by ester 1 (3.00 g, 1 eq.). The heterogeneous reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. A slurry of sodium hydrosulfite (330 mg), magnesium silicate (3.0 g) and water (25 ml) was prepared and added to the reaction mixture and stirred for 5 min. The reaction mixture was filtered through celite and the filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 * 50 ml). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated to give a clear viscous oil (yield 2.95 g, 80%). 1 H NMR: [delta] 2.41 (t, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); IR, 1728 (s), 3402 (br m) cm -1 ; MS(ESI, m / z ), 191 (theor. 190.24). t-Butyl 4,5-bis-tosyloxypentanoate ( 3 ). A solution of the diol 2 (1.0 g) and triethylamine (3.0 ml) in dichloromethane (20 ml) was cooled to 0oC and then added dropwise to a solution of tosyl chloride (2.10 g) in dichloromethane (15 ml) at 0oC. Following this addition the reaction mixture was stirred at 0oC for 30 min and then at room temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed and the residue was treated with ethyl acetate (50 ml) and water (35 ml). The organic phase was separated and washed with saturated solutions of sodium bicarbonate and brine (30 ml each), dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated to give a colorless oil (2.92 g). Chromatographic purification on silica gel using hexane/ethyl acetate (3:1) eluent yielded 1.76 g (67% yield) of the ditosylate 3 . 1 H NMR: [delta] 4.66 (m, 1H), 2.17 (dt, 2H), 1.83 (dt, 2H), 1.35 (s, 9H); MS(ESI, m / z ), 499 (theor. 498.61). t-Butyl 4,5-diazidopentanoate ( 4 ). To a solution of the ditosylate 3 (3.5 g, 1 eq.) in dimethylformamide (20 ml) was added sodium azide (0.936 g, 2.05 eq.). The reaction mixture was heated at 60oC for 16 h. Next, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between ethyl acetate (30 ml) and water (20 ml) and the organic phase was separated and washed further with water (30 ml), dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated to give 1.5 g (88% crude yield) of the diazide 4 as a colorless oil. 1 H NMR: [delta] 3.60 (m, 1H), 3.45 (m, 2H), 1.8 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H); IR, 2104 (s), 1727 (m). t-Butyl 4,5-diaminopentanoate ( 5 ). A solution of the diazide 4 (380 mg) in methanol (3 ml) was added to a pre-hydrogenated mixture of 10% palladium on carbon (20 mg) in methanol (5 ml). The mixture was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen and stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The catalyst was removed by filtration through celite and the filtrate was concentrated to give 282 mg of 5 (97% crude yield) as a colorless oil which was used without further purification. 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 ): [delta] 2.3 (m, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H); IR, 1721 (s), 3300 (br m). t-Butyl 4,5-bis(fluorenylmethoxycarbamato)-diaminopentanoate ( 6 ). To a solution of the diamine 5 (50 mg, 1 eq.) in dichloromethane (2 ml) was added a solution of fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl suberimidate (188 mg, 2.1 eq.) in dichloromethane (2 ml). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. Then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was partitioned between ethyl acetate (10 ml) and water (10 ml). The organic phase was dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated to give 260 mg of a white solid. The desired biscarbamate 6 was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel using hexanes/ethyl acetate (2:1) as eluent. The final yield was 120 mg of a white crystalline solid (71% yield). 1 H NMR: [delta] 3.7 (m, 1H), 3.3 (br t, 2H), 2.3 (t, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H). 4,5-Bis(fluorenylmethoxycarbonamato)-diaminopentanoic acid ( 7 ). The ester 6 (60 mg) was treated with trifluoroacetic acid/dichloromethane (1:1, 4 ml) solution. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The solvents were then removed under reduced pressure and the residue was treated with ethyl acetate (4 ml). The resulting slurry was then placed in the freezer overnight and the precipitate was recovered by filtration and dried. Yield 35 mg (64%). 1 H NMR: [delta] 3.7 (m, 1H), 2.3 (t, 2H); MS(ESI, m / z ) 577.5 (theor. 576.65). Succinimidyl 4,5-bis(fluorenylmethoxycarbonamato)-diaminopentanoate ( 8 ). To a solution of the acid 7 (20 mg, 1 eq.) in dioxane (1 ml) and triethylamine (5.6 [mu]l, 1.1 eq.) was added dropwise a solution of succinimidyl 1,2,2,2-tetrachloroethylcarbonate (11 mg, 1 eq.) in dioxane (1 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Then the mixture was concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (10 ml) and washed with 10% aqueous citric acid and saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate and brine (10 ml each), dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated to give a white solid (25 mg). The product 8 was recrystalized from hexanes/ethyl acetate to give a white crystalline solid (16 mg, 68% yield). 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 ): [delta] 3.76 (m, 1H), 3.30 (t, 2H), 2.82 (s, 4H), 2.68 (t, 2H); MS(ESI, m / z ) 674.4 (theor. 673.7). Methyl 3,5-bis(isothiocyanatomethyl)benzoate ( 11 ). To a solution of methyl 3,5-bis(bromomethyl)benzoate (1.0 g, 1 eq.) in dimethylformamide (20 ml) was added sodium azide (0.4 g, 2 eq.). The reaction mixture was heated in an oil bath to 70oC for 15 min and then allowed to cool to room temperature. Then the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was partitioned between ethyl acetate and water. The organic phase was washed three times with water, once with brine, dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give methyl 3,5-bis(azidomethyl)benzoate ( 9 ) as a yellow oil. The crude product was used without further purification. R f 0.42 (4:1 hexane/ethyl acetate); IR (thin film), 2953, 2102, 1724, 1435, 1307, 1224 cm -1 ; 1 H NMR: [delta] 7.97 (s, 2H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 4.45 (s, 4H), 3.95 (s, 3H). A stirred suspension of 9 (0.77 g) and 10% palladium on carbon (0.07 g) in methanol (5 ml) was degassed at room temperature and then subjected to 1 atm hydrogen gas via inflated balloon for 12 h. Excess hydrogen was removed under vacuum and the reaction vessel was purged with argon. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celatom FW-14 with methanol washings and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give methyl 3,5-bis(aminomethyl)benzoate ( 10 ) as a pale yellow oil (yield 0.60 g). The crude product was used without further purification. IR (thin film), 3357, 3296, 2951, 1721, 1651, 1602, 1544, 1435, 1307, 1224 cm -1 ; 1 H NMR (DMSO-d 6 ): [delta] 7.76 (s, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 3.85 (s, 4H), 3.79 (s, 3H). To a stirred suspension of 10 in a 1:1 mixture of toluene/water (20 ml) was added sodium carbonate (0.83 g, 7.8 mmol). The mixture was cooled in an ice/water bath and then thiophosgene (0.52 ml, 6.86 mmol) was added dropwise by syringe. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and allowed to stand overnight. The resulting bilayer was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extracts were washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate and brine, dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give a yellow oil. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel using 9:1 hexane/ethyl acetate followed by 7:3 hexane/ethyl acetate as eluents gave 0.39 g of the desired product 11 as a thick oil, which solidified upon standing in a refrigerator (43% yield after three steps). m.p. 67-69oC; IR (thin film), 2950, 2185, 2096, 1722, 1609, 1434, 1305, 1222 cm -1 ; 1 H NMR: [delta] 7.95 (s, 2H), 7.48 (s, 1H), 4.81 (s, 4H), 3.93 (s, 3H). Succinimidyl 3,5-bis-[N ' -(tert-butoxycarbonyl)histidyl]-N-thioureamidylmethyl benzoate ( 14 ). To a solution of 11 (0.20 g, 1 eq.) in tetrahydrofuran (4 ml) was added histamine dihydrochloride (0.26 g, 1 eq.) and 1 M sodium carbonate solution (1.4 ml, 2 eq.). The resulting biphasic mixture was heated at 45oC for 5 h. The reaction mixture was transferred to a separating funnel and the organic phase was separated and concentrated under reduced pressure to give a wet oily residue. The crude residue was dissolved in methanol (3 ml) and then treated with 1 M sodium hydroxide solution (1.1 ml, 1.1 eq.). The reaction mixture was heated at 40oC for 4 h and then concentrated to give the sodium carboxylate intermediate ( 12 ) as an oily residue. This material was dissolved in dioxane (3 ml) and treated with di-t-butyldicarbonate (0.47 g, 2.16 mmol). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 12 h, diluted with water (5 ml) and extracted with ethyl acetate. The aqueous phase was acidified to pH 3 with 3 M aqueous HCl and then extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic phase was washed with brine, dried (MgSO 4 ), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 0.20 g t-butylcarbonyl-protected intermediate ( 13 ) as a crude white solid. 1 H NMR (acetone-d 6 ): [delta] 8.00 (s, 2H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.54 (br s, 2H), 7.26 (s, 2H), 4.82 (br s, 4H), 3.79 (br m, 4 H), 2.80 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H), 1.6 (s, 18H). To a solution of 13 (0.20 g) in dichloromethane (4 ml) were added N , N '-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (0.069 g, 0.33 mmol) and N -hydroxysuccinimide (0.038 g, 0.33 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h and then filtered to remove the urea by-product. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a semi-solid residue. Purification by flash chromatography on Fluorisil using 24:1 dichloromethane/isopropanol as eluent gave 49 mg of the desired product ( 14 ) as a white solid (9% yield after 4 steps). m.p. 100oC (dec.); 1 H NMR: [delta] 7.95, (s, 2 H), 7.90 (s, 2H), 7.59, (s, 1H), 7.14 (s, 2H), 4.74 (br m, 4H), 3.67 (br m, 4 H), 2.90 (s, 4H), 2.72 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 4H), 1.60 (s, 18H); MS(ESI, m / z ), 784.4 (theor. 783.93). N- [epsilon] -Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-L-lysyl-N- [alpha] -fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-N-im-trityl-histidine ( 15 ). To a solution of N -[epsilon]-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-L-lysine (100 mg, 0.37 mmol) (Bachem) in dichloromethane (5 ml) was added N , N -diisopropylethylamine (0.81 mmole, 2.2 eq.) and chlorotrimethylsilane (0.41 mmol, 1.1 eq.) dropwise with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at room temperature. Next, N -[alpha]-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl- N -im-trityl-histidine pentafluorophenyl ester (250 mg, 0.9 eq.) (Novabiochem) was added and the mixture was stirred for an additional 1 h at room temperature. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure and the product was dissolved in dichloromethane (2 ml) and purified by flash column chromatography (1 * 30 cm) on silica gel (230-400 mesh) using 2% methanol in dichloromethane as the eluent. The transient silyl protecting group was removed during this process. The yield of the product was 250 mg (89%). MS(ESI, m / z ), 970 (theor. 970); 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 ): [delta] 1.49 (m, 6H, CH 2 ), 1.89 (m, 2H, CH 2 ), 2.68 (m, 1H, CH), 3.06 (m, 2H, CH 2 ), 4.04-4.20 (5H), 4.35 (m, 1H, =CH), 4.57 (m, 1H, =CH), 4.88 (m, 2H), 7.02-7.74 (31 aromatic Fmoc and trityl protons). N- [epsilon] -Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-L-lysyl-N- [alpha] -fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-N-im-trityl-histidine pentafluorophenyl ester ( 16 ). Compound 15 (200 mg) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (1 ml) and pyridine (2 eq.) was added. Pentafluorophenyl trifluoroacetate (1.3 eq.) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temprature for 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC on silica gel (1:1 ethyl acetate/hexane). Then the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (100 ml) and extracted with 0.1 M aqueous HCl (2 * 100 ml) followed by 5% sodium bicarbonate (2 * 100 ml). The organic phase was separated, dried (MgSO 4 ) and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The yield of the product was 150 mg, which was estimated to be >90% pure by TLC and was used without further purification. MS(ESI, m / z ), 1136 (theor. 1136); 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 ): [delta] 1.55 (m, 4H, CH 2 ), 2.01 (m, 2H), 2.90 (m, 1H, CH), 3.22 (m, 2H, CH 2 ), 4.08-4.35 (3H), 7.02-7.74 (31 H, aromatic Fmoc and trityl protons).

Synthesis of RNA and non-nucleotide-based linker - modified methylphosphonate oligonucleotides (Fig. 1b)

Synthetic RNA was prepared as described previously ( 20 ). The non-nucleotide based, non-complementary linking reagent, having the parent structure shown in Figure 1 , has also been described ( 18 ). This reagent was coupled into the methylphosphonate oligonucleotide (MPO) at the indicated position within the sequence using an automated DNA synthesizer ( 18 , 21 - 22 ).


Figure 1 . ( a ) Chemical structures of catalytic RNA cleaver reagents used to modify oligonucleotides containing alkylamino linkers. ( b ) Sequences and structures of the RNA target and modified MPOs used in hydrolytic cleavage experiments.

Synthesis of methylphosphonate oligonucleotides conjugated with catalytic cleaver moieties (Fig. 1b)

Compounds 8 , 14 and 16 were conjugated onto a methylphosphonate oligonucleotide having a non-nucleotide, non-complementary amino linker inserted in the middle of the sequence (G-1719) to give oligonucleotide conjugates G-2337, G-2437 and G-2435 respectively. Conjugation reactions. Approximately 60 A 260 U methylphosphonate oligonucleotide G-1719 were dissolved in 1:1 acetonitrile/water (100 [mu]l). Next, the following reagents were added in the order indicated, with mixing after each addition to avoid precipitation: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 215 [mu]l), 1 M aqueous HEPES buffer, pH 8.0 (50 [mu]l) and a 100 mM solution of either 8 , 14 or 16 in anhydrous DMSO (35 [mu]l). The resulting mixture was reacted at room temperature for 1 h. At the end of this time period additional aliquots of 100 mM 8 , 14 or 16 (in DMSO, 12.5 [mu]l), DMSO (12.5 [mu]l), 1 M HEPES (pH 8.0, 5 [mu]l), and sterile water (20 [mu]l) were added. After mixing the reaction was allowed to continue for an additional 1 h. Absolute ethanol (1 ml) was added and the tube was chilled at -20oC to precipitate the conjugated product oligonucleotide. Then the tube was centrifuged for 15 min in a microcentrifuge at 4oC. The supernatant was discarded and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 1:1 acetonitrile/water (400 [mu]l). HPLC analysis and purification. The crude protected oligonucleotide conjugates described above were purified by reversed phase HPLC chromatography using a Beckman System Gold HPLC system equipped with a Model 168 diode array detector. A Hamilton PRP-1 polymeric reversed phase column was used (4.1 * 250 mm). Solvent A, 100 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6); solvent B; acetonitrile. Program 1 (for compounds 2337-1 and 2347-1): 0-15% solvent B (0-8 min), 15-45% solvent B (8-38 min), flow rate 1.5 ml/min; program 2 (for compound 2435-1): 0-15% solvent B (0-8 min), 15-70% solvent B (8-60 min), flow rate 1.5 ml/min. Retention times for the protected forms of the conjugated oligonucleotides were as follows: G-2337 (protected), 32.9 min; G-2435 (protected), 40.6 min; G-2437 (protected), 31.2 min. (At this stage Fmoc protecting groups remained on G-2337 and G-2435, a trityl protecting group remained on G-2435 and a Boc protecting group remained on G-2437.) Removal of protecting groups. The HPLC-purified protected forms of oligonucleotide conjugates G-2337, G-2435 and G-2437 from the previous step were dissolved in 47.5% acetonitrile/47.5% ethanol/5% water (1 ml) and redistilled ethylenediamine (1 ml) was added. After 1 h the reaction mixtures were diluted with water (9 ml) and neutralized with glacial acetic acid (0.6 ml). These solutions were then applied to a Sep-Paktm C18 cartridge (Millipore Corp.) that had been previously washed with acetonitrile (5 ml), 1:1 acetonitrile/water (5 ml) and water (5 ml). After application of the samples the cartridges were washed with water (8 ml). In the case of G-2435 the cartridge was also washed with 2% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (5 ml) to remove the trityl protecting group. The products were then eluted from the cartridges with 1:1 acetonitrile/water (5 ml) and concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. Following removal of the protecting groups the desired oligonucleotide conjugates were further purified by HPLC as described above. Retention times for the deprotected oligonucleotide conjugates were as follows: G-2337, 15.7 min (program 1); G-2435, 23.6 min (program 2); G-2437, 20.8 min (program 1). MS(ESI, m / z ): G-2337, 5407.9 (theor. 5408); G-2435, 5560.5 (theor. 5559.3); G-2437, 5763.9 (theor. 5762.0).

Spectroscopic thermal denaturation experiments

Annealing reaction mixtures contained equimolar amounts of antisense oligonucleotide analog and RNA target oligonucleotide (2.4 [mu]M total strand concentration), 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.2), 100 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.03% potassium sarkosylate. The reaction mixtures were heated to 80oC, cooled slowly to room temperature over ~2 h and then chilled to 4oC. The annealed samples were then transferred to 1 cm quartz cuvettes (pre-cooled to 4oC) and placed in a Varian Cary Model 3E spectrophotometer containing a temperature controlled 6 * 6 sample holder and interfaced to an IBM-compatible PC computer. Denaturation was monitored at 260 nm as a function of temperature, increasing from 5 to 80oC at a ramp rate of 1oC/min. Melting temperatures ( T m ) are defined at the point where 50% of the duplex had denatured and have an error of ~+-1oC. Based on this analysis, G-1719 (i.e. the unconjugated precursor MPO) was found to have a T m of ~29oC. Each of the conjugated MPOs (G-2337, G-2435 and G-2437) had T m values ranging from 30 to 32oC.

RESULTS

Modified methylphosphonate oligonucleotides containing catalytic RNA cleaver moieties

Several compounds were synthesized for conjugation onto an MPO having a primary non-nucleotide-based alkylamino linker in place of one of the complementary bases (G-1719, Fig. 1 ). Earlier work in our laboratory demonstrated that nucleotide bases on either side of this linker retain their ability to hydrogen bond and stack in an MPO/RNA heteroduplex ( 18 ). We chose to insert this linker in place of one of the complementary bases, reasoning that the opposing base on the complementary RNA strand would be less constrained to a stacked, helical geometry, thereby rendering its phosphodiester bonds more susceptible to hydrolytic cleavage. Each of these compounds was designed to provide a moiety on the MPO that is capable of catalyzing a hydrolytic cleavage reaction on its complementary RNA target. To facilitate the design process molecular modeling studies were conducted to ensure that the catalytic moieties are capable of spanning the distance from the antisense MPO strand to the RNA backbone (M.A.Reynolds and T.A.Larsen, unpublished results; models were created using Insight II software from Biosym Inc.). Compound 8 is a derivative of ethylenediamine (EDA). EDA is capable of catalyzing the hydrolytic cleavage of single-stranded RNA around pH 7-8 (M.A.Reynolds, T.A.Beck, P.B.Say, unpublished results; 17 , 23 , 24 ). Compound 14 contains two side chains terminating in imidazole moieties. Imidazole, like EDA, catalyzes the cleavage of single-stranded RNA at neutral pH ( 25 , 26 ). We assumed that two imidazole moieties tethered to the same molecule would have a synergistic catalytic effect, as has been demonstrated elsewhere ( 27 ). Compound 16 was designed based on a screen of various di- and tripeptides for their ability to catalyze RNA hydrolysis (M.A.Reynolds and P.B.Say, unpublished results).

These compounds were individually coupled onto G-1719 by solution phase coupling chemistries and the products were purified by HPLC chromatography. The structures of the resulting oligonucleotide conjugates are shown in Figure 1 b. Each conjugation reaction proceeded in good yield and gave products of acceptable purity (>90%) based on HPLC and ESI-MS analyses.

Hydrolytic cleavage of a complementary synthetic RNA target

Because of the relatively low binding affinities of these modified MPOs (see Materials and Methods) we decided to conduct our cleavage experiments at 25oC. The complementary RNA target strand (Fig. 1 b) was synthesized and labeled at the 5'-terminus with 32 P using [[gamma]- 32 P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. An excess of modified MPO was employed in each annealing reaction to drive the equilibrium to the duplex form at this temperature. Our first set of experiments examined the ability of G-1719 to direct site-specific cleavage on the RNA strand in the presence of an exogenous catalyst (1 M EDA, pH 7-8). As shown in Figure 2 (lanes 1 and 2), incubation of single-stranded RNA with the EDA catalyst produces a random cleavage pattern, whereas a single site-specific cleavage is observed in the presence of G-1719. Control experiments using a fully complementary MPO (i.e. not containing the non-nucleotide linker) showed complete protection of the RNA strand against hydrolytic cleavage (M.A.Reynolds and T.A.Beck, unpublished results). By correlating the bands in lane 1 with the known sequence for the RNA target it is evident that the primary cleavage fragment seen in lane 2 occurs in the vicinity of the non-nucleotide linker. Furthermore, the intensity of this band is greater than the corresponding band in lane 1, indicating that this site is cleaved at a faster rate when oligonucleotide G-1719 is present. Thus the heteroduplex formed between the RNA target and G-1719 creates a site on the RNA strand that is rendered more sensitive to catalytic hydrolysis compared with the single-stranded control. Also, according to our data the base paired regions of the RNA strand are protected from hydrolytic cleavage, confirming the hypothesis that base stacking slows down the rate of backbone hydrolysis.


Figure 2 . Autoradiogram of a cleavage experiment using RNA and the modified MPOs shown in Figure 1. Each cleavage reaction contained 32 P-labeled RNA (~100 000 c.p.m.). MPOs were added at a final concentration of 75 [mu]M. The reactions corresponding to lanes 1 and 2 contained EDA buffer (1 M ethylenediamine hydrochloride, pH 8). The remaining reactions contained PBS buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.03% potassium sarkosylate, pH 7.2). Reactions were incubated at 25oC for 5 days. Then aliquots from each reaction were loaded onto a 20% polyacrylamide-7 M urea sequencing gel. Lane 1, RNA alone, EDA buffer; lane 2, RNA + G-1719, EDA buffer; lane 3, RNA alone, PBS buffer; lane 4, RNA + G-1719, PBS buffer; lane 5, RNA + G-2337, PBS buffer; lane 6, RNA + G-2435, PBS buffer; lane 7, RNA + G-2437, PBS buffer.

In our next set of experiments the labeled RNA strand was incubated in neutral phosphate buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.03% potassium sarkosylate, pH 7.2), either alone or in the presence of methylphosphonate oligonucleotide G-1719, G-2337, G-2435 or G-2437. A typical result is shown in Figure 2 (lanes 3-7). An n - 1 cleavage fragment is seen in each of these lanes, indicative of a possible trace contamination with 3'-exonuclease. A small unique cleavage fragment is observed when the free single-stranded RNA target is incubated in this buffer (lane 3). This cleavage event does not appear to be a result of nuclease contamination, since it only occurs at one position within the sequence. Such sequence-dependent spontaneous cleavage events have been reported elsewhere and have proven to occur in the absense of nuclease contamination ( 28 - 30 ). This fragment is absent in the sample containing G-1719 (lane 4), further demonstrating that double-stranded regions of RNA are resistant to hydrolysis. The products from incubation reactions including one of the modified MPOs are shown in lanes 5-7. G-2337, which contains a single EDA moiety, produces a very faint but reproducible cleavage band (note the arrow in Fig. 3 ). G-2435 and G-2437, which contain two proton donor/acceptor moieties attached to the linker, generate more significant cleavage bands compared with G-2337 (lanes 6 and 7 respectively). Admittedly these cleavage reactions are still fairly modest (less than ~10% cleavage after 5 days incubation at 25oC). Nevertheless, it is clear that oligonucleotide conjugates G-2435 and G-2437 promote site-specific cleavage on the RNA target strand in the absence of exogenous catalyst.

DISCUSSION

A number of investigators have reported linking synthetic RNA cleaver catalysts to oligonucleotides ( 31 - 38 ). In most cases these catalysts were tethered to the 5'- or 3'-terminus. Here we directed the catalyst to a site on the RNA that is rendered more sensitive to hydrolysis due to the replacement of one of the complementary bases with a non-nucleotide-based linker. Our expectation was that the ribonucleotide base opposite this linker would be oriented outward from a stacked helical geometry, thereby rendering its phosphodiester bonds more susceptible to acid/base hydrolysis.

Other investigators have reported differences in the rate of acid/base hydrolysis of single- versus double-stranded RNA. For example, an imidazole-based catalyst was shown to cleave tRNA preferentially at junctions between stem and loop regions; double stranded regions are relatively unaffected ( 15 ). Such results are consistent with the prediction that double-stranded RNA is resistant to hydrolysis due to the restricted orientation of the 2'-hydroxyl of the first base with respect to the 5'-bonded oxygen of the second base ( 17 ). This is also consistent with an in-line displacement mechanism proposed for the cleavage reaction catalyzed by RNase A ( 39 ).

According to our data an MPO containing a non-nucleotide-based linker in place of one of the nucleotide bases directs a site-specific cleavage reaction on its complementary RNA target in the presence of exogenous catalyst (in this case 1 M EDA). Furthermore, modified MPOs G-2435 and G-2437 promote site-specific cleavage in the absence of exogenous catalyst. Thus we have demonstrated that the covalent attachment of a catalyst to an oligonucleotide via a non-nucleotide-based linker enables it to be directed toward a hydrolytically sensitive site on the RNA target, whereupon site-specific cleavage occurs. The rates of these cleavage reactions are relatively modest however ( t ½ values are estimated to be >5 days at 25oC based on inspection of the autoradiographs). This is believed to be due in part to the low binding affinity of these modified MPOs. Other work in our laboratory has demonstrated that backbone-modified oligonucleotides containing alternating Rp chiral methylphosphonate/phosphodiester linkages have significantly higher binding affinities for their RNA targets (unpublished results). We anticipate that similar conjugates including this improved backbone will yield more acceptable cleavage rates at physiological temperatures. Other catalysts are also being investigated.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Richard Hogrefe and Lina Borozdina for providing the synthetic RNA target and some of the methylphosphonate oligonucleotides. We thank John Jaeger for critically reviewing this manuscript and also thank Jik Chin for helpful scientific discussions. We are grateful to Timothy Riley and Michelle Chapman-Scurria at JBL Scientific Inc. for providing some of the methylphosphonate oligonucleotides and for running the ESI-MS analyses respectively.

REFERENCES

1 Dagle,J.M., Walder,J.A. and Weeks,D.L. (1991) Antisense Res. Dev., 1, 11-20. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Agrawal,S., Mayrand,S.H., Zamechnik,P.C. and Pederson,T. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 1401-1405. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Walder,R.Y. and Walder,J.A. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 5011-5015. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Woolf,T.M., Jennings,C.G., Rebagliati,M. and Melton,D.A. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 1763-1769. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Cazenave,C., Stein,C.A., Loreau,N., Thuong,N.T., Neckers,L.M., Subasinghe,C., Helene,C., Cohen,J.S. and Toulme,J.-J. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res., 17, 4255-4273. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Giles,R.V., Ruddell,C.J., Spiller,D.G., Green,J.A. and Tidd,D.M. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 954-961.

7 Monia,B.P., Lesnik,E.A., Gonzalez,C., Lima,W.F., McGee,D., Guinosso,C.J., Kawasaki,A.M., Cook,P.D. and Freir,S.M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268, 14514-14522. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Barbier,B. and Brack,A. (1988) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 6880-6882.

9 Shelton,V. M. and Morrow,J.R. (1991) Inorg. Chem., 30, 4295-4299.

10 Jubian,V., Dixon,R.P. and Hamilton,A.D. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 1120-1121.

11 Morrow,J.R., Buttrey,L.A., Shelton,V.M. and Berback,K.A. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 1903-1905.

12 Ariga,K. and Anslyn,E. (1992) J. Org. Chem., 57, 417-419.

13 Smith,J., Aruga,K. and Anslyn,E.V. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 362-364.

14 Kneeland,E., Ariga,K., Lynch,V.M., Huang,C.-Y. and Anslyn,E.V. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 10042-10055.

15 Podyminogin,M.A., Vlassov,V.V. and Giege,R. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 5950-5956. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Haydock,K., Lim,C., Brunger,A.T. and Karplus,M. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 3826-3831.

17 Usher,D.A. and McHale,A.H. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 1149-1153. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Reynolds,M.A., Beck,T.A., Hogrefe,R.I., McCaffrey,A., Arnold,L.J.,Jr and Vaghefi,M.M. (1992) Bioconjugate Chem., 3, 366-374.

19 Kolb,M., Barth,J., Heydt,J.-G. and Jung,M.J. (1987) J. Med. Chem., 30, 267-272.

20 Hogrefe,R.I., McCaffrey,A.P., Borozdina,L.U., McCampbell,E.S. and Vaghefi,M.M. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4739-4741. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Hogrefe,R.I., Vaghefi,M.M., Reynolds,M.A., Young,K.M. and Arnold,L.J.,Jr (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 2031-2038. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Hogrefe,R.I., Reynolds,M.A., Vaghefi,M.M., Young,K.M., Riley,T.A., Klem,R.E. and Arnold,L.J.,Jr (1993) In Agrawal,S. (ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 20: Protocols for Oligonucleotides and Analogs. Humana Press, Totowa, NY, pp. 143-164.

23 Renz,M., Lohrmann,R. and Orgel,L. (1971) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 240, 463.

24 Yoshinari,K., Yamazaki,K. and Komiyama,M. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 5899-5901.

25 Anslyn,E. and Breslow,R. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 1120-1121.

26 Breslow,R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 1208-1211. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Anslyn,E. and Breslow,R. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 5972-5973.

28 Beutler,E., Gelbert,T., Han,J., Koziol,J.A. and Beutler,B. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 192-196.

29 Kierzek,R. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5073-5077. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Kierzek,R. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5079-5084. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Le Doan,T., Perrooualt,L. and Helene,C. (1986) Biochemistry, 25, 6376-6379.

32 Chen,C.B. and Sigman,D.S. (1988) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 6570-6572.

33 Modak,A.S., Gard,J.K., Merriman,M.C., Winkeler,K.A., Bashkin,J.K. and Stern,J.K. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 283-291.

34 Bashkin,J.K., Gard,J.K. and Modak,A.S. (1990) J. Org. Chem., 55, 5125-5132.

35 Bashkin,J.K., Frolova,E.I. and Sampath,U. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 5981-5982.

36 Komiyama,M. and Inokawa,T. (1994) J. Biochem., 116, 719-720.

37 Komiyama,M., Inokawa,T., Shiiba,T., Takeda,N., Yoshinari,K. and Yashiro,M. (1993) Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 29, 197-198.

38 Hovinen,J., Guzaev,A., Azhayeva,E., Azhayev,A. and Lonnberg,H. (1995) J. Org. Chem., 60, 2205-2209.

39 Usher,D.A., Erenrich,E.S. and Eckstein,F. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 69, 115-118. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Lim,C. and Tole,P. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 7245-7252.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. L. Mironova, D. V. Pyshnyi, D. V. Shtadler, A. A. Fedorova, V. V. Vlassov, and M. A. Zenkova
RNase T1 mimicking artificial ribonuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2007; 35(7): 2356 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. G. Beloglazova, M. M. Fabani, M. A. Zenkova, E. V. Bichenkova, N. N. Polushin, V. V. Sil'nikov, K. T. Douglas, and V. V. Vlassov
Sequence-specific artificial ribonucleases. I. Bis-imidazole-containing oligonucleotide conjugates prepared using precursor-based strategy
Nucleic Acids Res., July 23, 2004; 32(13): 3887 - 3897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. L. Mironova, D. V. Pyshnyi, E. M. Ivanova, M. A. Zenkova, H. J. Gross, and V. V. Vlassov
Covalently attached oligodeoxyribonucleotides induce RNase activity of a short peptide and modulate its base specificity
Nucleic Acids Res., March 26, 2004; 32(6): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Sakamoto, T. Tamura, T. Furukawa, Y. Komatsu, E. Ohtsuka, M. Kitamura, and H. Inoue
Highly efficient catalytic RNA cleavage by the cooperative action of two Cu(II) complexes embodied within an antisense oligonucleotide
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2003; 31(5): 1416 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. C. Putnam, A. T. Daniher, B. N. Trawick, and J. K. Bashkin
Efficient new ribozyme mimics: direct mapping of molecular design principles from small molecules to macromolecular, biomimetic catalysts
Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2001; 29(10): 2199 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (84K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (67)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?