Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (125K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press 924-930

Footnote

Inhibition of transcription factor IIIA-DNA interactions by xenobiotic metal ions

Inhibition of transcription factor IIIA-DNA interactions by xenobiotic metal ions Jay S. Hanas* and C. G. Gunn

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City , OK 73190, USA

Received October 24, 1995; Revised and Accepted January 10, 1996

ABSTRACT

Transcription factor IIIA (TFIIIA) , a cysteine-rich regulatory protein , is the prototype for the largest known superfamily of eukaryotic transcription factors. Members of the TFIIIA superfamily contain Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger domains responsible for nucleic acid binding. Xenobiotic metal ions , which lack known biological function , were previously used as probes for the structure and function of steroid hormone receptors which contain Cys 2 Cys 2 zinc finger domains. Structural alterations in cysteine-rich regulatory proteins by such ions in vivo might potentiate carcinogenesis and other disease processes. In the present study cadmium and other xenobiotic metal ions were used to probe the structure and function of TFIIIA. The specific interaction of TFIIIA with the internal control region (ICR) of the 5S RNA gene, as assayed by DNase I protection, was inhibited by Cd 2+ ion concentrations of >= 0.1 [mu] M. Aluminum ions were also found to inhibit the TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interaction , albeit at higher concentrations ( >= 5 [mu] M). Inhibition by either metal ion was not readily reversible. Other xenobiotic metal ions, such as mercury or cesium, were not found to be inhibitory under these conditions. None of these ions at the concentrations used in this study affected the ability of DNase I to digest DNA or restriction enzymes to specifically cleave DNA. Preincubation of TFIIIA bound to 5S RNA with either Cd 2+ or Al 3+ resulted in subsequent DNA binding upon dilution and RNA removal, whereas preincubation of free TFIIIA with the metal ions resulted in inhibition of subsequent DNA binding. Because 5S rRNA also binds the TFIIIA zinc finger domains , these results indicate that the 5S RNA bound to TFIIIA protects the protein from metal inhibition and implicates the zinc fingers in the inhibition mechanism. The nature of the footprint inhibition indicates that the N-terminal fingers of TFIIIA are affected by the metal ions. Cd 2+ and Al 3+ ions also inhibited the ability of TFIIIA to bind complementary single-stranded DNA and promote renaturation, as measured by Tris-phosphate agarose gel electrophoresis. This gel assay is sensitive to DNA conformation and Al 3+ ions were found to alter the conformation of single- and double-stranded DNA in this assay. The inhibition of TFIIIA function in vitro by xenobiotic metals offers new insights into the structure and function of TFIIIA and TFIIIA-type zinc finger proteins. Inhibition by Cd 2+ occurs at much lower concentrations than previously observed with steroid hormone receptors and suggests that Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger proteins may be especially sensitive to such agents in vivo.

INTRODUCTION

Cysteine-rich zinc finger proteins constitute a large portion of the transcription factors that regulate initiation of RNA synthesis in higher organisms. Two prominent superfamilies of zinc finger proteins are the TFIIIA-type proteins ( 1 , 2 ) and the steroid hormone receptors ( 3 ). TFIIIA regulates eukaryotic 5S RNA synthesis by RNA polymerase III ( 4 ) and was the first cysteine-rich regulatory protein identified to contain zinc and require the metal for function ( 5 ). This protein binds to the 50 bp internal control region (ICR) of the 5S RNA gene and also binds to the 5S RNA gene product competitively with DNA ( 6 - 9 ). The zinc in TFIIIA is not tightly bound, since mild treatment with metal chelators stripped the metal from the protein and inhibited DNA binding; zinc addtion to the apoprotein restored specific DNA binding ( 5 ). The amino acid sequence of TFIIIA revealed a repetitive pattern of nine 30 amino acid domains (`fingers'), each containing two Cys and two His residues capable of metal coordination ( 10 ). The Zn 2+ ions hold the structure together, since their removal results in unfolding of TFIIIA and concomitant loss of specific DNA binding ability ( 11 ). Crystallographic analysis of TFIIIA-type Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger domains bound to DNA revealed compact finger domains wrapped around the major groove ( 12 ). The centrally located Zn 2+ ion in each finger was coordinated by the two Cys residues in an antiparallel [beta]-sheet and by the two His residues located on the same face of an [alpha]-helix. Residues in the [alpha]-helix interact specifically via hydrogen bonds with base pairs in the DNA, whereas other amino acids throughout the domain make ionic contacts on DNA phosphates ( 12 ). Mutagenesis of TFIIIA revealed the necessity for all four metal coordinating residues, as well as the integrity of interfinger linker regions, for specific DNA binding ( 13 ). Proteins containing TFIIIA-type zinc finger domains (Cys 2 His 2 ) number in the hundreds in vertebrates and constitute the largest known superfamily of such proteins in higher organisms ( 1 , 2 ). TFIIIA-type zinc finger proteins regulate a multitude of processes, including embryogenesis and oncogenesis ( 14 - 16 ).

The steroid hormone receptor superfamily comprises another large group of cysteine-rich zinc finger transcription factors which translocate into the nucleus upon hormone binding. These proteins activate expression from enhancer regions of a number of hormone responsive genes. Unlike the TFIIIA superfamily, the DNA binding domains of hormone receptors always contain just two Cys 2 Cys 2 zinc fingers ( 3 ). The first finger and linker region comprise an [alpha]-helix and make specific DNA contacts in the DNA major groove, whereas the second finger is involved in protein-protein interactions forming the active receptor dimer ( 17 ). Because of the cysteine-rich nature of the DNA binding domains of steroid hormone receptors, studies have examined the effects of metals other than zinc on the structure and function of hormone receptors. Such studies have added significance since a number of metal ions, including xenobiotic ions, are believed to have etiological roles in carcinogenesis and other disease processes ( 18 , 19 ). Elucidating mechanisms of metal ion-finger protein interactions will provide molecular insights into the structure and function of these proteins, as well as insights into potential disease processes. With respect to the estrogen receptor (ER), one study indicated that 1 mM Cd 2+ could inhibit DNA binding by activated (hormone-bound) receptors and 0.1 mM Cd 2+ could inhibit initial binding of hormone to receptor ( 18 ). Another study demonstrated that Cd 2+ could replace zinc in the ER and suffice for DNA binding, although some functional variation was observed ( 19 ). In the present study, the effects of Cd 2+ and other xenobiotic metals on the DNA binding behavior of a Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger protein,TFIIIA, were examined in order to gain understanding of the structure and function of Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger proteins and to elucidate potenial toxicity or regulatory mechanisms by such cations or other small molecules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of 7S particles and TFIIIA from Xenopus laevis oocytes

Immature ovarian tissue was dissected from 4-5 cm female X.laevis frogs (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) and homogenized briefly in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10 000 g for 20 min and aliquots of the supernatant were layered on 15-30% glycerol gradients in homogenization buffer and centrifuged for 24 h at 34 000 r.p.m. in a SW41 rotor. All manipulations were performed at 0-4oC. The 7S fractions containing TFIIIA bound to 5S rRNA were identified by UV absorption of gradient fractions and further purified to 90-95% purity (judged by SDS-PAGE of 39 kDa TFIIIA) by DEAE-cellulose chromatography essentially as described previously ( 5 ). 5S RNA was removed from TFIIIA by digestion with RNase A (10 [mu]g/ml) in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 320 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.4 mM DTT and 0.1% NP-40 for 30 min at room temperature and then placed on ice. Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford using bovine serum albumin as the standard ( 20 ).

DNase I protection assays

A plasmid containing the Xenopus borealis somatic 5S RNA gene was purified by CsCl/ethidium bromide equilibrium gradient centrifugation ( 13 ). The 303 bp DNA fragment containing the 120 bp Xenopus 5S RNA gene was end-labeled on the coding strand by digesting the plasmid first with Eco RI and incorporating [[alpha]- 32 P]dATP with reverse transcriptase ( 13 ). The end-labeled fragment was ethanol precipitated, redigested with Bam HI and the smaller fragment was purified by PAGE. Specific activity of the fragment was determined by absorbance at 260 nm and Cerenkov counting. To examine the effects of various metals on the TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interaction TFIIIA (10 nM) was incubated with the various metals (chloride salts of all metals were ultrapure grade and purchased from Aldrich; concentrations are indicated in the figure legends) in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 70 mM NH 4 Cl, 7 mM MgCl 2 , 0.4 mM DTT and 0.1% NP-40 for 10 min prior to addition of the DNA fragement containing the end-labeled 5S RNA gene (1 nM). After addition of DNA the reaction (20 [mu]l) was incubated at room temperature for an additional 15 min. The reactions were then incubated for an additional 1 min in DNase I (2 [mu]g/ml final concentration) and digestion was terminated by addition of 100 [mu]l stop buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 30 [mu]g/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA). The samples were ethanol precipitated, dried, resuspended in 4 [mu]l formamide soution (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 95% deionized formamide, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% xylene cyanol and bromphenol blue), heated to 95oC for 5 min and electrophoresed on a 7 M urea-7% polyacrylamide gel until the xylene cyanol marker had migrated two thirds the distance of the gel. Gel autoradiography was performed overnight at -70oC with Kodak XAR-5 film and a Dupont Cronex intensifying screen.

Single-stranded DNA renaturation assays

Complementary single-stranded DNA template for renaturation assays was obtained by denaturing the 303 bp 32 P-end-labeled fragment (in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 ) at 100oC for 5 min, followed by quick cooling in an ice/water bath. The non-denatured 303 bp end-labeled fragment was used as the double-stranded DNA control. TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation was performed under the same TFIIIA binding conditions as described in the DNase I protection assay above. TFIIIA, DNA and metal ion concentrations are given in the figure legends. The renaturation reactions (20 [mu]l) were quenched by addition of 4 [mu]l electrophoresis sample buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 25% glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue). Agarose gel (0.6%) electrophoresis utilizing a 20 mM Tris-phosphate buffer, pH 8.3, was used to resolve single- and double-stranded DNA in the renaturation assays ( 21 ). Gels were exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film overnight at 4oC.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of xenobiotic metal ions on the TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interaction

Cd 2+ ions (0.1-1.0 mM) were found to inhibit steroid hormone receptors and have been useful probes of receptor structure and function ( 18 ). It was important to determine the effects of various concentrations of Cd 2+ and other xenobiotic metal ions on the structure and function of the other major class of zinc finger transcription factors, the TFIIIA-type, with their Cys 2 His 2 DNA binding domains. Figure 1 is an autoradiogram exhibiting the effects of Cd 2+ and Hg 2+ ions on the interaction of Xenopus TFIIIA with the internal control region (ICR) of the Xenopus 5S RNA gene as assayed by DNase I protection. In Figure 1 A all concentrations of Cd 2+ tested (5-20 [mu]M, lanes 3-6) were found to be inhibitory, as evidenced by the loss of TFIIIA-dependent DNAse I protection from nucleotides +43 to +96 on the coding strand of the 5S RNA gene (cf. minus and plus TFIIIA controls, lanes 1 and 2). This inhibitory concentration for Cd 2+ on TFIIIA function (5 [mu]M) is significantly lower than that observed with steroid hormone receptors. In contrast, Hg 2+ over this same concentration range had no effect on the TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interaction (Fig. 1 B, DNAse I protection observed between nucleotides +43 and +96, lanes 3-6). Because Cd 2+ but not Hg 2+ ions were able to inhibit TFIIIA binding to the 5S RNA gene, it was necessary to examine potential effects of other metal ions on this interaction. In order to determine how specific this metal ion inhibition was Al 3+ , Zn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Mn 2+ and Cs 2+ (all at 10 [mu]M final concentration) were examined for inhibitory effects on TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interactions as determined by DNase I digestion (Fig. 2 ). At this concentration only Al 3+ (Fig. 2 , lane 3) was able to inhibit this interaction to any appreciable extent, as evidenced by loss of DNase I protection from nucleotides +43 to +96. Lead ions were also found to inhibit TFIIIA-DNA interactions, albeit at higher concentrations (75-100 [mu]M range; data not shown). It is noted that although Cd 2+ and Al 3+ inhibit TFIIIA-DNA interactions at low concentrations they are not general inhibitors of DNA-protein interactions, as no effect on DNase I digestion is observed (Figs 1 and 2 , cf. digestion pattern in lane 1, no TFIIIA, with lanes exhibiting TFIIIA binding inhibition). In addition, these metal ions did not inhibit a variety of restriction enzymes tested (data not shown).


Figure 1 . DNase I protection autoradiogram of the effects of cadmium and mercury ions on TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interactions. TFIIIA was purified from X.laevis immature ovarian tissue; the X.borealis somatic 5S RNA gene-containing fragment was end-labeled on the coding strand with 32 P. DNase I protection assays, denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The nucleotide positions on the coding strand relative to the +1 start site of transcription on the 5S RNA gene are located in the left margin; the locations of the C box, intermediate element (M) and the A box on the 5S RNA gene are indicated in the right margin. ( A ) Lane 1, DNase I digestion of the 5S RNA gene in the absence of TFIIIA; lanes 2-6, DNase I digestion of the 5S gene in the presence of TFIIIA plus 0, 5, 10, 15 or 20 [mu]M CdCl 2 . ( B ) As (A) except that HgCl 2 replaced CdCl 2 .


Figure 2 . Varying abilities of a variety of metal ions to inhibit TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interactions. TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection reactions with the 5S RNA gene were performed as described in Materials and Methods and the legend to Figure 1. Lanes 1 and 2, DNase I protection reactions in the absence and presence of TFIIIA; lanes 3-7, TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection reactions in the presence of 10 [mu]M AlCl 3 , ZnCl 2 , MgCl 2 , MnCl 2 or CsCl respectively.

In order to obtain more detailed information about the dose-response characteristics of the Cd 2+ and Al 3+ inhibition increasing concentrations of the respective metal ions were incubated in the TFIIIA binding reactions, followed by DNase I protection analysis. This experiment would identify the lowest inhibitory concentration for both Cd 2+ and Al 3+ in the DNase I protection experiments illlustrated in Figures 1 and 2 . Figure 3 A exhibits the TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection pattern of the 5S RNA gene in the presence of increasing concentrations of Cd 2+ . Inhibition of TFIIIA binding (loss of DNase I protection between nucleotides +43 and +96) is near complete at 0.1 [mu]M Cd 2+ (lane 4), although some binding is still occurring, as evidenced by the DNase I hypersensitive site at +43. Therefore, <10 molecules of Cd 2+ per TFIIIA molecule are inhibitory. Complete loss of this TFIIIA-dependent DNase I hypersensitivity, as well as DNase I protection up to nucleotide +96 on the coding strand, is observed in the 0.25 [mu]M sample (lane 5). Figure 3 B exhibits the Al 3+ dose-response inhibition of TFIIIA binding to the 5S RNA gene (lanes 1 and 2 are minus and plus TFIIIA binding controls). Slight inhibition of TFIIIA binding by Al 3+ ions is observed at 1 [mu]M (lane 3) and complete inhibition is observed in the 5-7 [mu]M range (lanes 5 and 6). This inhibitory concentration of Al 3+ is ~50-fold greater than that for Cd 2+ .


Figure 3 . Concentration dependence of Cd 2+ and Al 3+ ion inhibition of TFIIIA-5S RNA gene interactions. TFIIIA-dependent DNase I protection reactions and autoradiography were performed as described in Materials and Methods and the legend to Figure 1. ( A ) Lane 1, DNase I protection reactions of the 5S RNA gene in the presence of TFIIIA alone; lanes 2-6, DNase I protection assays in the presence of TFIIIA and 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 or 1 [mu]M CdCl 2 respectively. ( B ) Lanes 1 and 2, DNase I protection assays of the 5S RNA gene in the absence and presence of TFIIIA; lanes 3-8, DNase I protection reactions in the presence of TFIIIA and 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 12 [mu]M AlCl 3 respectively.

Ability of xenobiotic metal ions to inhibit TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation

Besides binding to the 5S RNA gene, TFIIIA also has the ability to promote DNA renaturation and was the first transcription factor shown to possess such an activity ( 21 , 22 ). More recently the transcription factor/tumor suppressor p53 was also shown to promote DNA renaturation ( 23 ). TFIIIA renatures DNA by binding initially to complementary single-stranded DNAs, accelerating their reassociation and then remaining associated with the renatured double-stranded DNA ( 21 , 22 ). Unlike the DNase I protection assay of the 5S gene, TFIIIA depleted of Zn 2+ ions retains the ability to promote DNA renaturation ( 22 ). Because TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation is a DNA binding mechanism distinct from that assayed by DNase I protection, it was of interest to determine whether xenobiotic metal ions also inhibit this process. DNA migration in the Tris-phosphate agarose gel electrophoresis system used in the DNA renaturation assay is sensitive to some types of DNA structural changes ( 22 ). This assay is useful in this study because it can detect structural changes in the nanomolar DNA concentration range. Before assaying for xenobiotic metal effects on TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation we discovered that Al 3+ ions by themselves altered the electrophoretic mobility of both single- and double-stranded DNA in this Tris-phosphate gel system (Fig. 4 ). Lanes 1 and 2 in the Figure 4 autoradiogram show migration of the native double-stranded and heat-denatured 303 bp end-labeled fragment in this gel system; the denatured single-stranded DNA migrates substantially slower (lane 2) than the double-stranded DNA (lane 2). Lanes 3 and 4 contain the same DNA samples as lanes 1 and 2, but incubated with 10 [mu]M Al 3+ ions prior to electrophoresis. The migration of both DNA forms is retarded by Al 3+ ions to about the same extent and the bands are also broadened. The binding of Al 3+ ions could reduce the negative charge density of DNA to a variable degree and slow migration. However, simple electrostatic binding to DNA is expected to occur with other metal cations, yet this migration effect is not observed with 10 [mu]M Cd 2+ (lanes 5 and 6), Hg 2+ (lanes 7 and 8) or Zn 2+ (not shown). We conclude that Al 3+ ions induce a unique structural change in both single- and double-stranded DNA under these conditions. Zn 2+ and Cd 2+ ions do cause DNA structural changes (as deduced by chemical modification), but at significantly higher concentrations than used in the present study ( 24 , 25 ).


Figure 4 . Autoradiogram of Tris-phosphate agarose gel electrophoresis of double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA in the presence of AlCl 3 , CdCl 2 or HgCl 2. 32 P-End-labeling of the 5S RNA gene, DNA denaturation, metal ion binding reactions and Tris-phosphate gel electrophoresis were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The electrophoretic migration positions of double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA are indicated in the left margin. Lanes 1 and 2, double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA incubated in the absence of metal ions prior to electrophoresis; lanes 3 and 4, double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA incubated in the presence of 10 [mu]M AlCl 3 prior to electrophoresis; lanes 5 and 6, double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA incubated in the presence of 10 [mu]M CdCl 2 prior to electrophoresis; lanes 7 and 8, double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA incubated in the presence of 10 [mu]M HgCl 2 prior to electrophoresis.

Figure 5 is an autoradiogram depicting the effects of Al 3+ ions on TFIIIA-dependent DNA reanturation. Lanes 1-4 in Figure 5 A exhibit the end-labeled, double-stranded and single-stranded 5S gene incubated in the absence and presence of 5 [mu]M Al 3+ ions (note the Al 3+ effect on migration in lanes 2 and 4). Lanes 5-7 exhibit TFIIIA-dependent renaturation in the presence of increasing concentrations of TFIIIA. The protein renatures the slower migrating, denatured band to the more rapidly migrating double-stranded band. Lanes 8-10 exhibit the ability of TFIIIA to promote DNA renaturation in the presence of 5 [mu]M Al 3+ ions, an inhibitory ion concentration in the DNase I protection studies (Fig. 3 B). No significant inhibition is observed under these conditions, since DNA migration resembles the formation of double-stranded DNA exhibited in lanes 5-7 (no added Al 3+ ). Thus demonstrable interaction of Al 3+ ions with single-stranded DNA under conditions that alter the structure of that DNA does not necessarily inhibit TFIIIA binding and renaturation. The double-stranded DNA being produced in the renaturation reaction in the presence of Al 3+ is not structurally altered to the same extent as observed in the absence of protein (lane 2). This could be due to binding of Al 3+ to TFIIIA above some critical value necessary for ion interaction with DNA. If metal ion interaction with TFIIIA occurs under these conditions it does not cause inhibition of DNA renaturation, even though inhibition of DNase I protection of the 5S RNA gene is observed under these same conditions (Fig. 3 B). However, at much higher concentrations of Al 3+ ions (50 [mu]M) inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation does occur (Fig. 5 B). This inhibition is shown by the characteristic retarded migration of single-stranded DNA observed under these conditions (lanes 8-10). It is conceivable that the higher concentration of Al 3+ ions results in greater ion binding to TFIIIA, since the retarded migration of single-stranded DNA is similar to that observed at 5 [mu]M Al 3+ . Cd 2+ ions were also found to inhibit TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation (Fig. 6 ). This is evidenced by the complete lack of double-stranded DNA renatured in the presence of TFIIIIA and 1 [mu]M Cd 2+ ions (lanes 8-10). As with inhibition of DNAse I protection of the 5S RNA gene, the inhibitory concentration of Cd 2+ ions for DNA renaturation is much lower than that observed for Al 3+ ions.


Figure 5 . Effect of Al 3+ ions on TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation. TFIIIA isolation, 32 P-end-labeling of the 5S RNA gene, denaturation and renaturation reactions, Tris-phosphate agarose gel electrophoresis and autoradiography were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The electrophoretic migration positions of double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA are indicated in the left margins. ( A ) Lanes 1 and 2, 1 nM double-stranded DNA incubated in the absence and presence of 5 [mu]M AlCl 3 prior to electrophoresis; lanes 3 and 4, 1 nM single-stranded DNA incubated in the absence and presence of Al 3+ ions; lanes 5-7, single-stranded DNA incubated in the presence of 10, 20 or 30 nM TFIIIA prior to electrophoresis; lanes 8-10, single-stranded DNA incubated in the presence of 5 [mu]M Al 3+ plus 10, 20 or 30 nM TFIIIA respectively prior to electrophoresis. ( B ) As (A) except 50 [mu]M AlCl 3 was used.

Xenobiotic metal ions inhibit the nucleic acid binding domains of the Cys 2 His 2 zinc finger protein TFIIIA

How do Cd 2+ and Al 3+ ions inhibit TFIIIA binding to DNA? One possibility is that the ions interact with the DNA template and alter the structure necessary for TFIIIA binding. Another possibility is that the ions interact directly with TFIIIA and disrupt the protein structure, resulting in binding inhibition. Experiments involving Al 3+ ion inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation (Fig. 5 ) suggested the latter. However, the previous DNA binding experiments did not clearly distinguish between these two possibilities, since protein, DNA and metal ions were incubated together in the same reaction tube. To examine for metal inhibition on TFIIIA directly Cd 2+ or Al 3+ ions were added to the free protein at higher concentration and then diluted ~25-fold in the final DNase I protection assay, out of the inhibitory range for the metals deduced from Figure 3 . In addition, TFIIIA bound to 5S RNA was analyzed in the same way, because 5S RNA and the 5S RNA gene compete for the same binding region on TFIIIA ( 8 , 9 ). Importantly, 5S RNA bound to TFIIIA protects the zinc fingers from denaturation by EDTA, which occurs rapidly in the absence of bound 5S RNA ( 5 ). This observation indicates that the finger domains are not as accessible to solutes when complexed with 5S RNA.

When free TFIIIA is exposed to an inhibitory Cd 2+ concentration and then diluted out of the inhibitory range in the DNase I protection reaction with the 5S RNA gene binding inhibition is maintained, as evidenced by the loss of DNase I protection from nucleotides +43 to +96 (Fig. 7 A, lane 3). Significant binding inhibtion is not observed when TFIIIA bound to 5S RNA is initially exposed to Cd 2+ followed by dilution and RNA removal in the DNase I assay (lane 5). Lanes 1 and 2 are the minus and plus TFIIIA controls and lane 4 is a control in which 5S RNA is removed from TFIIIA (by RNase digestion) in the DNase I protection reaction. As a control for potential binding of Cd 2+ to RNA, a mixture of TFIIIA and tRNA was exposed to the metal ions and inhibition was still observed (not shown). These results indicate that metal inhibition of TFIIIA can occur by direct ion interaction with the protein, that the interaction is not readily reversible by dilution (or by a 200-fold molar excess of added Zn 2+ ; not shown) and that the zinc finger domains (protected by 5S RNA) are likely targets for the inhibition. A similar experiment was also conducted with Al 3+ (Fig. 7 B). Lanes 3 and 4 exhibit the DNase I digestion patterns when free TFIIIA and TFIIIA bound to 5S RNA are initially exposed to Al 3+ ions and then diluted ~25-fold before assaying for DNA binding activity (along with RNA removal in the lane 4 reaction). Binding inhibition is only observed with the free TFIIIA sample (lane 3), again indicating a direct, irreversible effect of Al 3+ on TFIIIA. Lanes 7 and 8 in Figure 7 B exhibit the DNase I protection patterns when free TFIIIA and TFIIIA bound to 5S RNA in the 7S particle are exposed to Hg 2+ ions followed by dilution, RNase treatment for the lane 8 sample and DNase I digestion of the binding reaction. Protection is seen in both lanes, indicating that Hg 2+ ions have no effect on TFIIIA under either of these conditions. Lanes 1 and 5 are minus TFIIIA controls and lanes 2 and 6 are controls containing TFIIIA liberated from the 7S particle by digestion with RNase prior to the binding assay (lane 2) or in the binding assay (lane 6).


Figure 6 . Cd 2+ ions inhibit TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation. TFIIIA isolation, 32 P-end-labeling of the 5S RNA gene, denaturation and renaturation reactions, Tris-phosphate agarose gel electrophoresis and autoradiography were performed as described in the legend to Figure 5. The electrophoretic migration positions of double-stranded and single-stranded 5S DNA are indicated in the left margin. Lanes 1 and 2, 1 nM double-stranded DNA incubated in the absence and presence of 1 [mu]M CdCl 2 prior to electrophoresis; lanes 3 and 4, 1 nM single-stranded DNA incubated in the absence and presence of Cd 2+ ions; lanes 5-7, single-stranded DNA incubated in the presence of 10, 20 or 30 nM TFIIIA prior to electrophoresis; lanes 8-10, single-stranded DNA incubated in the presence of 1 [mu]M Cd 2+ plus 10, 20 or 30 nM TFIIIA respectively prior to electrophoresis.


Figure 7 . Cd 2+ and Al 3+ ions interact directly with TFIIIA resulting in inhibition of transcription factor binding to the 5S RNA gene. TFIIIA isolation, 32 P-end-labeling of the 5S RNA gene, DNase I protection reactions, gel electrophoresis and autoradiography were performed as described in Materials and Methods and the legend to Figure 1. ( A ) Lanes 1 and 2, DNase I digestion reactions of the 5S RNA gene (1 nM) in the absence and presence of 10 nM TFIIIA; lanes 3 and 5, protection reactions in which free TFIIIA (250 nM) and TFIIIA complexed with 5S RNA were initially incubated with 1.5 [mu]M CdCl 2 and then diluted ~25-fold in the protection reaction. 5S RNA was removed from TFIIIA in the lane 5 sample by RNase A digestion in the DNase I protection reaction. In the protection reaction electrophoresed in lane 4 the RNA in the TFIIIA-RNA complex (never exposed to Cd 2+ ions) was removed in the DNase I protection reaction. ( B ) The reactions electrophoresed in lanes 1 and 2 and 5 and 6 are minus and plus TFIIIA controls. Lanes 3 and 4, protection reactions in which free TFIIIA (250 nM) and TFIIIA complexed with 5S RNA were initially incubated with 10 [mu]M AlCl 3 prior to 25-fold dilution into the DNase I protection reaction and RNA removal (lane 4); lanes 7 and 8, as lanes 3 and 4 except 10 [mu]M HgCl 2 replaced AlCl 3 .

The experiments in Figure 7 demonstrate that Cd 2+ and, at higher concentrations, Al 3+ interact directly with TFIIIA and cause loss of DNA binding function. To our knowledge, Al 3+ has not been previously reported to inhibit nucleic acid metabolism. Cd 2+ ions were previously shown to inhibit transcription of the Escherichia coli ada gene in vitro ( 26 ). Mechanistically, inhibition of TFIIIA by Cd 2+ is observed at fairly low metal to protein molar ratios (<10; Fig. 3 A), indicating that quite specific targets are involved. The N-terminal three fingers of TFIIIA are necessary for initiating DNA binding to the 5S RNA gene and provide DNase I protection of the C box (approximately nucleotides +90 to +80; Fig. 6 B; 13 ). Site-specific mutations in these N-terminal fingers of TFIIIA block footprinting of the protein to the entire ICR (+96 to +43; 13 ). Mutations in the middle three fingers of TFIIIA allow binding to the C box, but inhibit binding upstream of the C box, in the intermediate element (M) and A box ( 13 ). Because Cd 2+ ions inhibit TFIIIA binding to the entire ICR of the 5S RNA gene, amino acid residue(s) and/or other structures in the N-terminal fingers are minimally involved. Binding of Cd 2+ to the more C-terminal fingers in the absence of binding to the N-terminal three fingers should still allow a footprint over the C box and this is not observed. Cd 2+ has a high affinity for Cys residues and this may be the basis for the DNA binding inhibition observed in both DNase I protection and DNA renaturation. Hg 2+ ions, which also bind sulfhydryl groups, did not inhibit TFIIIA under these conditions, which indicates some degree of specificity in the Cd 2+ -TFIIIA interaction. Simple displacement of Zn 2+ from the finger domains by Cd 2+ is probably not occurring, because a 200-fold molar excess of Zn 2+ ions does not block or reverse the inhibition. In addition, Zn 2+ ion coordination in TFIIIA fingers is not required for TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation, yet the process is still inhibited by the xenobiotic metal ions. Xenopus laevis TFIIIA has a non-coordinating Cys residue in each of fingers 1, 4, 6 and 9 and the non-finger C-terminal tail. Even though the Cys residue in the first finger (located between the zinc coordinating His residues) is not required for specific DNA binding (a change to Ser does not alter binding; 13 ), Cd 2+ binding to this residue or similar residues in fingers 4, 6 and 9 could cause alterations in structure, with possible disruption of function. Cd 2+ interaction with non-coordinating Cys residues in fingers 4, 6 and/or 9 would not give the DNase I protection inhibition observed, but could be responsible for inhibition of TFIIIA-dependent DNA renaturation, since this property is dependent in part on the structural integrity of the C-terminal half of the protein ( 22 ).

The in vitro inhibitory concentration of Cd 2+ (0.1 [mu]M) for TFIIIA is ~5-fold higher than the serum concentration of this ion in moderate to heavy smokers ( 27 ). Cd 2+ induces teratogenesis and carcinogenesis in rodents and potentially in humans as well ( 28 , 29 ). In vivo inhibition of specific binding of TFIIIA by Cd 2+ per se would not be expected to induce such developmental changes, because TFIIIA inhibition would shut off 5S RNA synthesis and ribosome production, which are essential for cell viability. Cd 2+ is physiologically toxic and cells contain metallothionein proteins as protection against this and other heavy metal ions ( 30 ). TFIIIA may be one of the biochemical targets that Cd 2+ inhibits in eukaryotic cells, other targets including the calcium transport machinery ( 31 ). The DNA binding domains of TFIIIA are representative of an entire superfamily of transcription factors which number in the hundreds in vertebrates (most of their functions are not known; 1 , 2 ). Our results with TFIIIA suggest that these related factors, as well as other cysteine-rich regulatory proteins involved in signal transduction, are potenially at risk of Cd 2+ inhibition in vivo , especially at low sublethal concentrations. If such factors are involved in regulating transcription responsible for normal cell growth or differentiation, their inhibition by Cd 2+ could lead to abnormal cell growth or teratogenesis. In this regard, Cd 2+ would be acting as a tumor promoter, for which there is some experimental evidence ( 32 ). Inhibitory interactions of metal ions with cysteine-rich finger proteins in vitro suggests that the domains of such proteins may be accessible to other inhibitor molecules in vivo . Such interactions could have a role in cell growth and differentiation. Inhibitors of helix-loop-helix transcription factors, for example, are believed to be responsible for determination of cell type ( 33 ).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology. The authors thank J. Smith for excellent technical assistance.

Chesterfield Gunn, M.D., (co-author) died on July 30, 1995. The medical and scientific community is poorer in his absence.

REFERENCES

1 Pellegrino,G.R. and Berg,J.M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 671-675. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Hanas,J.S., Gaskins,C.J., Smith,J.F. and Ogilvie,M.K. (1992) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol., 43, 205-239.

3 Evans,R.M. (1988) Science, 242, 889-895.

4 Engelke,D.R., Ng,S.-Y., Shastry,B.S. and Roeder,R.G. (1980) Cell, 19, 717-728.

5 Hanas,J.S., Hazuda,D.J., Bogenhagen,D.F., Wu,F.Y.-H. and Wu,C.-W. (1983) J. Biol. Chem., 258, 14120-14125. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Sakonju,S., Bogenhagen,D.F. and Brown,D.D. (1980) Cell, 19, 13-25.

7 Bogenhagen,D.F., Sakonju,S. and Brown,D.D. (1980) Cell, 19, 27-35. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Honda,B.M. and Roeder,R.G. (1980) Cell, 22, 119-126. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Pelham,H.R.B. and Brown,D.D. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77, 4170-4174. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Miller,J., McLachlan,A.D. and Klug,A. (1985) EMBO J., 4, 1609-1614.

11 Hanas,J.S., Duke,A.L. and Gaskins,C.J. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 4083-4088.

12 Pavletich,N.P. and Pabo,C.O. (1991) Science, 252, 809-817.

13 Smith,J.F., Hawkins,J., Leonard,R.E. and Hanas,J.S. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 6871-6876. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Christy,B.A., Lau,L.F. and Nathans,D. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 7857-7861. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Kinzler,K.W., Ruppert,J.M., Bigner,S.H. and Vogelstein,B. (1988) Nature, 332, 371-374. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Buckler,A.J., Pelletier,J., Haber,D.A., Glaser,T. and Housman,D.E. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 1707-1712. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Luisi,B.F., Xu,W.X., Otwinowski,Z., Freedman,L.P., Yamamoto,K.R. and Sigler,P.B. (1991) Nature, 353, 497-505.

18 Simons,S.S.,Jr, Chakraborti,P.K. and Cavanaugh,A.H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265, 1938-1945.

19 Predki,P.F. and Sakar,B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 5842-5846.

20 Bradford,M.M. (1976) Anal. Biochem., 72, 248-254.

21 Fiser-Litttell,R.M. and Hanas,J.S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem., 263, 17136-17141.

22 Hanas,J.S., Hazuda,D.J. and Wu,C.-W. (1985) J. Biol. Chem., 260, 13316-13320.

23 Bakalkin,G., Yakovleva,T., Selivanova,G., Magnusson,K.P., Szekely,L., Kiseleva,E., Klein,G., Terenius,L. and Wiman,K.G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 413-417. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Berneus,J., Beltran,R., Casasnovas,J.M. and Azorin,F. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 4067-4073. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Kang,S. and Wells,R.D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 9528-9532. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Sakumi,K. and Sekeguchi,M. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 179, 1517-1521.

27 Radisch,S. Luck,W. and Nau,H. (1994) Toxicol. Lett., 36, 147-152.

28 Barr,M. (1973) Teratology, 7, 237-242.

29 Takenaka,S., Olgiges,H., Konig,H., Hochrainer, and Oberdorster,G. (1983) J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 70, 367-371.

30 Kojima,J. and Kagi,J.H.R. (1978) Trends Biochem. Sci., 3, 90-93.

31 Verbost,P.M., Flik,G., Lock,R.A.C. and Wendelaar Bonga,S.E. (1988) J. Membr. Biol., 102, 97-104.

32 Wade,G.G., Mandel,R. and Ryser,H.J.-P. (1987) Cancer Res., 47, 6606-6613. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Lee,J.E., Hollenberg,S.M., Snider,L., Turner,D.L., Lipnick,N. and Weintraub,H. (1995) Science, 268, 836-844.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Balasubramanyam, N. Sailaja, M. Mahboob, M. F. Rahman, S. M. Hussain, and P. Grover
In vivo genotoxicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials in rat peripheral blood cells using the comet assay and micronucleus test
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2009; 24(3): 245 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
C. Collin-Hansen, S. A. Pedersen, R. A. Andersen, and E. Steinnes
First report of phytochelatins in a mushroom: induction of phytochelatins by metal exposure in Boletus edulis
Mycologia, March 1, 2007; 99(2): 161 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. Wang and D. E. Crowley
Global Gene Expression Responses to Cadmium Toxicity in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol., May 1, 2005; 187(9): 3259 - 3266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Vetillard and T. Bailhache
Cadmium: An Endocrine Disrupter That Affects Gene Expression in the Liver and Brain of Juvenile Rainbow Trout
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Asmuss, L. H.F. Mullenders, A. Eker, and A. Hartwig
Differential effects of toxic metal compounds on the activities of Fpg and XPA, two zinc finger proteins involved in DNA repair
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2000; 21(11): 2097 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. L. Guével, F.G. Petit, P. L. Goff, R. Métivier, Y. Valotaire, and F. Pakdel
Inhibition of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Estrogen Receptor Activity by Cadmium
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 259 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. S. Hanas, J. S. Rodgers, J. A. Bantle, and Y.-G. Cheng
Lead Inhibition of DNA-Binding Mechanism of Cys2His2 Zinc Finger Proteins
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 1999; 56(5): 982 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Roesijadi, R. Bogumil, M. Vasak, and J. H. R. Kagi
Modulation of DNA Binding of a Tramtrack Zinc Finger Peptide by the Metallothionein-Thionein Conjugate Pair
J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 1998; 273(28): 17425 - 17432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (125K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?