Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (138K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K
Right arrow Articles by Uedal, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K
Right arrow Articles by Uedal, K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1008-1014

Footnote

Extensive RNA editing of U to C in addition to C to U substitution in the rbcL transcripts of hornwort chloroplasts and the origin of RNA editing in green plants

Extensive RNA editing of U to C in addition to C to U substitution in the rbcL transcripts of hornwort chloroplasts and the origin of RNA editing in green plants Koichi Yoshinaga* , Hiroe Iinuma , Takehiro Masuzawa and Kunihiko Uedal 1

Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422, Japan and 1 Faculty of Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-11, Japan

Received January 3, 1996; Accepted February 1, 1996 DDBJ accession nos D43695 and D43696

ABSTRACT

We cloned and sequenced a portion of chloroplast DNA from the hornwort Anthoceros formosae. A nucleotide sequence of 7556 bp contained structures similar to those of ndhK, ndhC , trnV , trnM , atpE , atpB , rbcL , trnR and accD. The arrangement of these was the same as that of other chloroplast DNA. However, two nonsense codons were located within the putative coding region of rbcL, although they were used as putative termination codons of the genes. RNA was extensively edited in the transcripts of rbcL when cDNA sequences were analyzed. The unusual nonsense codons of TGA and TAA became CGA and CAA respectively. These are examples of U to C type RNA editing, which was never been found before in chloroplast mRNA. In general, 13 Cs of genomic DNA were found as Ts in the cDNA sequence and seven Ts were found as Cs. This is the first finding of RNA editing on the transcripts of rbcL and also in bryophytes. This event had been thought to arise in land plants after the split of bryophytes. The origin of RNA editing is discussed in relation to the landing of green plants.

INTRODUCTION

One serious challenge against the central dogma of molecular biology is the discovery of RNA editing. Genetic information not found in the genomic template can be transferred into mRNA after transcription. RNA editing was first discovered in the kinetoplast genetic system of trypanosome ( 1 ), later in the nuclear encoded mRNA of human apolipoprotein ( 2 ), and in a number of transcripts encoded by plant mitochondrial DNA ( 3 - 7 ). These events were found in all major groups of land plants except bryophytes ( 7 ). In angiosperm chloroplasts, RNA editing has also been identified ( 8 - 18 ). In chloroplasts, all RNA editing found so far has been C to U substitutions, whereas U to C substitutions have also been found in plant mitochondria. It had been thought that editing arose in early land plants after the split of bryophytes because no editing has been identified in representatives of green algae and in liverwort ( 7 ). However, we found U to C RNA editing as well as C to U in rbcL transcripts of hornwort ( Anthoceros formosae ) chloroplasts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oligonucleotides

The following oligonucleotide primers designed from genomic DNA sequence of A. formosae were synthesized and obtained from Sawaday Technology (Tokyo, Japan) or Biologica (Nagoya, Japan):

P1, 5'-AGTAGACTTCGTCCCTGCAAGAGTT;

P2, 5'-TCCTCTCCAGCAACAGGTTCAATGT;

P3, 5'-AACTGGTACATGGACTACTGTTTGG;

P4, 5'-CTACTGTACCTGGATGAATATGATC;

P5, 5'-ACCGACAGACAAAGAAATCATGGTA;

P6, 5'-AAAACGAAAGAGCTGAATTGCAA;

P7, 5'-CCTCCTGTCAAATAATCATGCATTAC.

The positions and orientations of these oligonucleotides are shown in Figure 2 .

Isolation of genomic DNA from chloroplast-rich fraction

Thalli of the hornwort A.formosae were incubated at 25oC on 1/2 KnopII-agar medium under continuous fluorescent light. The thalli were harvested and homogenized in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA, 20% sucrose, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% BSA. The homogenate was filtered though cheese-cloth and unbroken cells were precipitated by centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 s. The chloroplast-rich fraction was precipitated from the supernatant by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min. Nucleic acids were extracted from the chloroplast-rich fraction as described by Dellaporta et al . ( 19 ). Contaminating RNA was removed from the DNA sample by digestion with RNaseA.

Cloning of genomic DNA and identification of clones

DNA from the chloroplast-rich fraction was partially digested with Bgl II and 15-20 kb fragments were electro-eluted from an agarose gel as described ( 20 ). The fragments were then ligated to the Charomid 9-28 vector (Nippon Gene), packed in phage particles using Gigapack (Funakoshi), and infected into Escherichia coli DH5[alpha]. 100 colonies grown in the presence of ampicillin were transferred to Biodyne A membranes (Pall) and hybridized with a Hin dIII fragment containing part of the rbcL gene of Angiopteris lygodiifolia ( 21 ) . The membranes were washed with 0.1* SSC containing 0.1% SDS at 50oC and exposed to Fuji X-ray film. Five positive clones, pCH13, pCH47, pCH48, pCH62 and pCH79, were identified. Plasmids were isolated by the boiling lysis ( 22 ) and analyzed by Southern hybridization using the Hin dIII fragment described above as the probe.

Sequencing of DNA

A Kpn I fragment of 7.5 kb was excised from pCH79 and ligated into pUC18. The resulting plasmid named pK79 was used for sequencing after subcloning into the pUC18 vector. Plasmids pCH13, pCH47, pCH48 and pCH62 were cut with Sal I and religated. The five resulting plasmids were cut with Hin dIII, then 2.9 kb fragments were subcloned into pUC18 and sequenced by dideoxy chain-termination ( 23 ) using the BcaBest sequencing kit (Takara) or 7-deaza Sequenase Ver. 2.0 (USB). The products of the sequencing reactions were applied to a denaturing polyacrylamide gel and exposed to Fuji X-ray film. The resulting sequences were treated with Genetyx software Ver. 7.06 (SDC).

Isolation of total RNA

Total cellular nucleic acids were prepared using CTAB ( 24 ) with a slight modification. Frozen thalli (3 g) of A.formosae were disrupted with quartz sand and nucleic acids were extracted in 10 ml of extraction buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 1% cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and 1% 2-mercaptoethanol at 60oC for 30 min. Total RNA was precipitated by adding LiCl to a final concentration of 2 M after extraction of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24/1,v/v). Contaminating DNA was removed from the RNA sample by digestion with RNase-free DNase (Boehringer Mannheim).

Reverse transcription of RNA

The total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using a commercial kit (lst-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Clontech). Total RNA (0.5 [mu]g) and 20 pmol random hexamer primer were annealed at 70oC for 2 min and cooled to 0oC. They were then mixed with 10 pmol of each of four nucleotide triphosphates (dNTP), 20 U recombinant RNase inhibitor and 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase in a total volume of 20 [mu]l. The reaction proceeded at 42oC for 60 min and at 94oC for 5 min, then 80 [mu]l of water was added.

Cloning of cDNA

The cDNA was amplified by means of a PCR Amplification Kit (Takara) and the primer pairs P1-P2, P3-P4 and P5-P6 (described above) by Program Temp Control System PC-700 (Astec). The reaction (100 [mu]l) contained 10 [mu]l of diluted cDNA, 100 pmol of each primer pair, 20 pmol of each of dNTP and 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The thermocycles were 94oC for 2 min, 55oC for 2 min and 72oC for 2 min. Typically, the reaction proceeded though 30 cycles, followed by 72oC for 7 min. Amplified cDNAs were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and extracted from the gel using Gene Clean II Kit (Bio 101). They were then filled-in with the Klenow fragment (Nippon Gene) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (Takara) and ligated to pUC18. E.coli DH5[alpha] was transformed with the ligated DNA. At least six colonies from each transformation were picked up and plasmids prepared from them by boiling lysis ( 22 ) were sequenced as described above using appropriate primers.

Statistical analysis of phylogenies

A phylogenetic tree was obtained from amino acid sequences which were deduced from the genomic DNA and cDNA sequences of rbcL genes. The maximum likelihood tree of green plants was selected by PROTML (JTT model), after comparing all the trees including the best topology among 10 000 random addition heuristic searches by PROTML, the 262 most parsimonious trees by PAUP using PROTPARS weighing and the five NJ tree topologies using various means to calculate genetic distances, namely CLUSTALW, PROTDIST and PROTML. Stop codons except for terminal one in Megaceros are substituted by X (unknown residue), and the opening codon T in Selaginella and Isoetes is accepted as it is.

RESULTS

Nucleotide sequence of chloroplast DNA from A.formosae

Five clones (pCH13, pCH47, pCH48, pCH62 and pCH79) assumed to contain rbcL were selected from a DNA library of A.formosae by colony and Southern hybridization as described in Materials and Methods. A 7.5 kb Kpn I fragment from pCH79 assumed to contain rbcL was subcloned. The resulting plasmid pK79 was sequenced. We found that the sequence contained portions homologous to ndhK , ndhC , trnV , trnM , atpE , atpB , rbcL , trnR and accD in this order (Fig. 1 ). The gene arrangement is the same as that of Marchantia ( 25 ) and that of Nicotiana ( 26 ) except for trnR, which is not found in Nicotiana, suggesting that the sequence is that of chloroplast DNA. However, the nonsense codons TAA and TGA were identified in the putative coding regions of rbcL, though TAA and TGA were used as putative stop codons in rbcL and atpB , respectively. In addition to these, an ACG codon was found at the position of putative initiation codon of atpB (in preparation). These findings indicate that RNA is edited in these transcripts.


Figure 1 . Chloroplast gene arrangements of A.formosae. Coding regions are shown by boxes and the intron is indicated by a broken line in trnV . In the upper part, two unusual nonsense codons, the initiation codon and the termination codon of the rbcL gene are shown. The nucleotide sequence has been deposited in the DDBJ-EMBL database under the accession no. D43695.


Table 1 Codons differing between genomic DNA and cDNA sequences Positions containing the different nucleotides are shown on the top. Dots show nucleotides identical with those of genomic DNA and deduced amino acids are parenthesized. Corresponding codons and deduced amino acids of Marchantia are shown on the bottom line. These amino acids are the same as those of Nicotiana except Ala at 982, which is Ser in Nicotiana.


Figure 2 . Comparison of nucleotide sequences of genomic DNA from A.formosae chloroplasts and cDNA synthesized with specific primer pairs for rbcL. The amino acid sequence deduced from genomic DNA is shown in the upper part. Nonsense codons are indicated with asterisks. The cDNA sequences obtained from pRL20, pRBCL1 and p3RL20 are shown as cDNA-a, cDNA-b and cDNA-c respectively. Dots show nucleotides identical to those of genomic DNA. Codons that differed between genomic and cDNA sequences are underlined and the deduced amino acids are shown below. The numbering of amino acids and nucleotides shown on the right is from the translation start site of rbcL. The positions and orientations of the primers used for amplification of cDNA and for sequencing are indicated by horizontal arrows. The nucleotide sequence of the cDNA has been deposited in the DDBJ-EMBL database under the accession no. D43696.

To ensure that the insert in pK79 was derived from chloroplast genome, the other four plasmids were analyzed. Plasmids pCH13S, pCH47S, pCH48S and pCH62S were prepared from pCH13, pCH47, pCH48 and pCH62 respectively, by removing the Sal I stuffer and religating them. Physical maps obtained by Kpn I, Bgl II and Hin dIII digestion revealed that all the plasmids contained common Kpn I fragments of 7.5 kb where three Hin dIII and two Bgl II sites were located in the same place. One Hin dIII fragment of 2.9 kb was recovered from each of them, sub-cloned and partially sequenced. The nucleotide positions from 1 to 383 of rbcL (Fig. 2 ) were identical where the two nonsense codons were included. These results indicated that the five independently isolated plasmids were derived from a homogeneous chloroplast genome, because if any of the plasmids were derived from another source such as nuclear or mitochondrial genomes, the restriction profiles or nucleotide sequences should have differed as shown by Moon et al . ( 27 ).

Evidence of RNA editing

To examine the possibility of RNA editing, we determined the mRNA sequence by analyzing cDNA. Each of cDNAs amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the primer pair gave a single amplification product of the predicted size. Each amplified cDNA was ligated into pUC18. Thus, three series of plasmids pRL, pRBCL and p3RL were obtained when primer pairs of P1-P2, P3-P4 and P5-P6 were used respectively. Locations and orientations of the primers designed from the genomic DNA sequence are shown in Figure 2 . Complete nucleotide sequences of at least five plasmids from each series were determined. The cDNA and genomic sequences are compared in Figure 2 . Two nonsense codons in the genomic sequence were changed into sense codons by a U to C substitution at positions 121 and 133. We are the first to discover this type of RNA editing in chloroplasts. In addition, 17 other sense codons were changed by RNA editing. In total, 13 of C to U substitutions were found and seven of U to C. The amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA was closer to those of other plants than the predicted gene product. For example, the similarity with the cDNA and the genomic DNA was 94.3 and 90.7% respectively when compared with the genomic DNA of Marchantia ( 25 ).

The details of cDNA sequences are shown in Figure 3 and summarized in Table 1 . RNA editing of C to U substitutions was found at nucleotide positions of 70 and 119, and U to C at 121 and 133 in every plasmid of the pRL series (Fig. 3 A and Table 1 ). C was substituted by U at 303, 398, 413 and 485, and U to C at 310 in every plasmid of the pRBCL series (Fig. 3 B). C to U substitutions at 677, 902, 903, 941 and 953, and U to C at 824 were also found in all plasmids of the pRBCL series (Fig. 3 C). C to U at 941 and 953 were also found in every plasmid of the p3RL series, along with C to U at 982 and 1046, and U to C at 1015, 1048 and 1127 (Fig. 3 D). All of the sites were fully edited in all clones examined.


Figure 3 . Comparison of nucleotide sequences of genomic DNA and cDNAs. All the autoradiograms represent mRNA-like sequences. Partial sequences of genomic DNA are shown in between the sequence ladders of genomic DNA and cDNA. Codons changed by editing are underlined and edited nucleotides are shown with nucleotide positions from the translation start site, and the locations on sequence ladders are shown with lines. Sequence ladders are shown containing positions 70, 119, 121 and 133 ( A ); 303, 310, 398, 413 and 485 ( B ); 677, 824, 902, 903, 941 and 953 ( C ); and 982, 1015, 1046, 1048 and 1127 ( D ).

DISCUSSION

Typical RNA editing found in chloroplasts is the creation of an initiation codon by converting ACG to AUG ( 8 , 9 , 12 , 15 , 17 ). This type of editing is an important control system of organelle gene expression by the nucleus when the editing system is derived from nuclear genes, because translation cannot start until the start site is edited ( 28 ). The situation is similar in A.formosae, because the nonsense codons TGA and TAA are located close to the start codon. Therefore, even if translation starts before editing, it will stop soon after 40 amino acids are synthesized. It has also been observed in maize chloroplasts, where four C to U editing sites clustered within 150 nucleotides of 5' terminal region of rpoB transcripts ( 14 ). The unusual initiation codon ACG of the rbcL sequences has been found in the lycopodophytes Selaginella (L11280) and Isoetes (L11054) suggesting the creation of the initiation codon AUG in the lycopodophytes by RNA editing ( 29 ).

The RNA editing found in chloroplasts to date is a C to U substitution. However U to C substitution is found in the hornwort chloroplasts, which should be found in many other chloroplasts of primitive land plants. The DNA sequence of the hornwort Megaceros enigmaticus (L13481) contains two nonsense codons (TGA) within the putative coding region suggesting U to C conversion in this plant. The reason why a U to C substitution had not been identified in chloroplasts may be mainly because such studies have been limited to higher plants. Alternatively, it cannot be ruled out that a U to C substitution has been acquired only by anthocerophytes.

RNA editing was thought to arise in land plants after the split of bryophytes, because no editing in mitochondria had been found either in bryophytes or in algae ( 7 ). However, we found extensive RNA editing in the hornwort, A.formosae. We believe that RNA editing will be found in the chloroplasts of many other primitive land plants, because 20 editing sites per 1428 nucleotides in the rbcL transcript of the hornwort (this study), eight sites per 480 nucleotides in the 5' region of chlL of the fern Pteridium (K. Yamada, personal communication), and several editing sites in 10 genes and the ORF of gymnosperms have disappeared during evolution to the angiosperms Nicotiana (T. Wakasugi, personal communication). The same tendency has also been identified in trypanosomatid mitochondria, where entire genes are edited in the early diverging branch but where editing is limited to the 5' terminal of editing domains in later separated lineages ( 30 ). A notion with respect to the origin of the RNA editing process in plant mitochondria has been proposed. That is the evolutionary appearance of the event at the level of the first land plants ( 7 ). The finding of the event in chloroplast of A.formosae supports this notion. Since RNA editing has been found in the hornwort, more studies of this event in chloroplasts of primitive land plants, including green algae, are important to elucidate the origin of RNA editing.

As a result of RNA editing, 19 amino acids deduced from the mRNA sequence differed from those predicted from the DNA sequence (Table 1 ). This difference, corresponding to 4.0% of the peptide, is comparable with that between the sequence of this hornwort species and that of the fern, Angiopteris lygodiifolia (X58429). We considered that this difference would alter the phylogenetic position of A.formosae on the tree based on amino acid sequences which were deduced from genomic and cDNA sequences of rbcL. Therefore, a tree was constructed (Fig. 4 ). However, A.formosae based on genomic DNA sequences is a sister to that based on cDNA. The phylogenetic tree shows that A.formosae locates in between Coleochaete and pteridophytes, which is in agreement with one of the classical views ( 31 ) and the molecular data ( 3 ) that the hornworts are evolutionally distinct from the liverworts and the mosses. The origin of vascular plants is not clear, however our results suggest that one of possible origins is hornworts. The fact that editing was found in A.formosae but not observed in Marchantia polymorpha indicates that the event arose in chloroplasts of the first land plants and disappeared from liverworts, alternatively it arose in the common ancestor of hornworts and vascular plants. The DNA sequence of the hornwort Megaceros enigmaticus (L13481) contains two nonsense codons within the putative coding region and one of them is located exactly in the same position as in that of A.formosae, suggesting RNA editing in this plant as mentioned by Manhalt ( 29 ). M.enigmaticus should come close to A.formosae when the mRNA sequence is analyzed.


Figure 4 . Maximum likelihood tree of green plants based on amino acid sequences of rbcL. Scale indicates a substitution rate per site per year. F, ferns; S, sphenophytes (horsetails); A, anthocerophytes (hornworts); Ps, psilophytes; L, lycopodophytes (club moss); Co, coleochaetephytes; Ch, charaphytes; H, hepatics (liverworts); M, mosses; G, Chlorophytes s.s. (green algae); U, ulvophytes; Pr, prasionophytes. Slim arrow indicates a branch of <0.00001; vertical arrow indicates a branch not fully supported. DNA sequences were obtained from the DNA databank except those of A.formosae.

One peculiar feature of this tree is that the charaphytes Chara and Nitella and coleochaetephytes Klebsormidium are located in a group of land plants, although these, together with other coleochaetes, are believed to be direct ancestors of land plants ( 33 , 34 ). The amino acid sequences deduced from genomic DNAs of charaphytes and coleochaetephytes may differ from those of peptides because of RNA editing, though the event has not yet been found in any algae. Here, we propose that the mechanism of RNA editing in chloroplasts would be acquired to effect the landing of plants and that some charaphytes and coleochaetephytes would already have possessed the mechanism which could be a potential for landing. RNA editing in addition to genomic mutation and the acquisition of introns ( 34 ) can increase the mutation rate of peptides. This would provide good opportunities for plants to adapt to various environmental circumstances.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Masahiro Sugiura for helpful suggestions. We also thank Kyouji Yamada and Tatsuya Wakasugi for unpublished data, Kiyomi Wada for helpful advice and for providing A.formosae , and Tatsuya Ishii for sequencing of genomic DNA. This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (No. 07640926) from the Ministry of Education of Japan.

REFERENCES

1 Benne,R., van den Burg,J., Brakenhoff,J.P., Sloof,P., Van Boom,J.H. and Tromp,M.C. (1986) Cell 46, 819-826. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Powell,L.M., Wallis,S.C., Pease,R.J., Edwards,Y.H., Knott,T.J. and Scott,J. (1987) Cell 50, 831-840. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Covello,P.S. and Gray,M.W. (1989) Nature 341, 662-666. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Gualberto,J.M., Lamattina,L., Bonnard,G., Weil,H. and Grienenberger,J.M. (1989) Nature 341, 660-662. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Hiesel,R., Wissinger,B., Schuster,W. and Brennicke,A. (1989) Science 246, 1632-1634. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Chapdelaine,Y. and Bonen,L. (1991) Cell 65, 465-472. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Hiesel,R., Combettes,B. and Brennicke,A. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 626-633.

8 Hoch,B., Maier,R.M., Appel,K., Igloi,G.L. and Koessel,H. (1991) Nature 353, 178-180. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Kudla,J., Igloi,G.L., Metzlaff,M., Hagemann,R. and Koessel,H. (1992) EMB0 J. 11, 1099-1103.

10 Maier,R.M., Hoch,B., Zeltz,P. and Koessel,H. (1992) Plant Cell 4, 609-616. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Maier,R.M., Neckermann,K., Hoch,B., Akhmedov,N.B. and Koessel,H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 6189-6194.

12 Kuntz,M., Camara,B., Weil,J-H. and Schantz,R. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1185-1188. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Freyer,R., Hoch,B., Neckermann,K., Maier,R.M. and Koessel,H. (1993) Plant J. 4, 621-629. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Zeltz,P., Hess,W.R., Neckermann,K., Boerner,T. and Koessel,H. (1993) EMB0 J. 12, 4291-4296.

15 Bock,R., Hagemann,R., Koessel,H. and Kudla,J. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 240, 238-244. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Hirose,T., Wakasugi,T., Sugiura,M. and Koessel,H. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 509-513. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Neckermann,K., Zeltz,P., Igloi,G.L., Koessel,H. and Maier,R.M. (1994) Gene 146, 177-182. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Ruf,S., Zeltz,P. and Koessel,H. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 2295-2299. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Dellaporta,S.L., Wood,J. and Hicks,J.B. (1983) Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 1, 19-21.

20 Yoshinaga,K., Ohta,T., Suzuki,Y. and Sugiura,M. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 10, 245-250.

21 Yoshinaga,K., Kubota,Y., Ishii,T. and Wada,K. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 79-82. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

23 Sanger,F., Nicklen,S. and Coulson,A.R. (l977) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467.

24 Gawel,N.J. and Jarret,R.L. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 9, 262-266.

25 Ohyama,K., Fukuzawa,H., Kohchi,T., Shirai,H., Sano,T., Sano,S., Umesono,K., Shiki,Y., Takeuchi,M., Chang,Z., Aota,S-I., Inokuchi,H. and Ozeki,H (1986) Nature 322, 572-574.

26 Shinozaki,K., Ohme,M., Tanaka,M., Wakasugi,T., Hayashida,N., Matsubayashi,T., Zaita,N., Chunwongse,J., Obokata,J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki,K., Ohto,C., Torazawa,K., Meng,B.Y., Sugita,M., Deno,H., Kamogashira,T., Yamada,K., Kusuda,J., Takaiwa,F., Kato,A. Tohdoh,N., Shimada,H. and Sugiura,M. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2043-2049.

27 Moon,E., Kao,T.H. and Wu,R. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 611-630.

28 Pring,D., Brennicke,A. and Schuster,W. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 21, 1163-1170.

29 Manhart,J.R. (1994) Mol. Phyl. Evol. 3, 114-127.

30 Maslov,D.A., Avila,H.A., Lake,J.A. and Simpson, L. (1994) Nature 368, 345-348. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Bold,H.C. (1970) The Plant Kingdom, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 3rd Ed., pp. 77-86.

32 Hori,H., Lim,B.-L. and Osawa,S. (1985) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 820-823.

33 Baldauf,S.L. and Palmer,J.D. (1990) Nature 344, 262-265. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Manhart,J.R. and Palmer,J.D. (1990) Nature 345, 268-270. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DNA ResHome page
K. Yura, Y. Miyata, T. Arikawa, M. Higuchi, and M. Sugita
Characteristics and Prediction of RNA Editing Sites in Transcripts of the Moss Takakia lepidozioides Chloroplast
DNA Res, July 23, 2008; (2008) dsn016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Rudinger, M. Polsakiewicz, and V. Knoop
Organellar RNA Editing and Plant-Specific Extensions of Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins in Jungermanniid but not in Marchantiid Liverworts
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1405 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
D. Karcher, S. Kahlau, and R. Bock
Faithful editing of a tomato-specific mRNA editing site in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts
RNA, February 1, 2008; 14(2): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. W. Chumley, J. D. Palmer, J. P. Mower, H. M. Fourcade, P. J. Calie, J. L. Boore, and R. K. Jansen
The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Pelargonium x hortorum: Organization and Evolution of the Largest and Most Highly Rearranged Chloroplast Genome of Land Plants
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2175 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. C. Villarreal A. and K. S. Renzaglia
Structure and development of Nostoc strands in Leiosporoceros dussii (Anthocerotophyta): a novel symbiosis in land plants
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2006; 93(5): 693 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw and K. Renzaglia
Phylogeny and diversification of bryophytes
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1557 - 1581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Fiebig, S. Stegemann, and R. Bock
Rapid evolution of RNA editing sites in a small non-essential plastid gene
Nucleic Acids Res., July 7, 2004; 32(12): 3615 - 3622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Sasaki, Y. Yukawa, T. Miyamoto, J. Obokata, and M. Sugiura
Identification of RNA Editing Sites in Chloroplast Transcripts from the Maternal and Paternal Progenitors of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): Comparative Analysis Shows the Involvement of Distinct Trans-Factors for ndhB Editing
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2003; 20(7): 1028 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kugita, Y. Yamamoto, T. Fujikawa, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshinaga
RNA editing in hornwort chloroplasts makes more than half the genes functional
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2003; 31(9): 2417 - 2423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
S. Westphal, J. Soll, and U. C. Vothknecht
Evolution of Chloroplast Vesicle Transport
Plant Cell Physiol., February 15, 2003; 44(2): 217 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kugita, A. Kaneko, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Takeya, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshinaga
The complete nucleotide sequence of the hornwort (Anthoceros formosae) chloroplast genome: insight into the earliest land plants
Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2003; 31(2): 716 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. Miyamoto, J. Obokata, and M. Sugiura
Recognition of RNA Editing Sites Is Directed by Unique Proteins in Chloroplasts: Biochemical Identification of cis-Acting Elements and trans-Acting Factors Involved in RNA Editing in Tobacco and Pea Chloroplasts
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2002; 22(19): 6726 - 6734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Turmel, C. Otis, and C. Lemieux
The chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences of the charophyte Chaetosphaeridium globosum: Insights into the timing of the events that restructured organelle DNAs within the green algal lineage that led to land plants
PNAS, August 20, 2002; 99(17): 11275 - 11280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Villegas, I. Muller, J. Arredondo, R. Pinto, and L. O. Burzio
A putative RNA editing from U to C in a mouse mitochondrial transcript
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2002; 30(9): 1895 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-L. Qiu, J. Lee, B. A. Whitlock, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, and O. Dombrovska
Was the ANITA Rooting of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Affected by Long-Branch Attraction?
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2001; 18(9): 1745 - 1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Richardson, N. Navaratnam, and J. Scott
Secondary Structure for the Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Site. AU-BINDING PROTEINS INTERACT WITH A STEM LOOP
J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 1998; 273(48): 31707 - 31717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Freyer, M.-C. Kiefer-Meyer, and H. Kossel
Occurrence of plastid RNA editing in all major lineages of land plants
PNAS, June 10, 1997; 94(12): 6285 - 6290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Wakasugi, T. Nagai, M. Kapoor, M. Sugita, M. Ito, S. Ito, J. Tsudzuki, K. Nakashima, T. Tsudzuki, Y. Suzuki, et al.
Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from the green alga Chlorella vulgaris: The existence of genes possibly involved in chloroplast division
PNAS, May 27, 1997; 94(11): 5967 - 5972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (138K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K
Right arrow Articles by Uedal, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K
Right arrow Articles by Uedal, K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?