Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (46K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, L
Right arrow Articles by Legerski, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, L
Right arrow Articles by Legerski, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1026-1028

Footnote

Sequence of the mouse XPC cDNA and genomic structure of the human XPC gene

Sequence of the mouse XPC cDNA and genomic structure of the human XPC gene Lei Li , Carolyn Peterson and Randy Legerski*

Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston , TX 77030, USA

Received December 18, 1995; Revised and Accepted January 29, 1996 GenBank accession no. U27398

ABSTRACT

The full length-mouse XPC cDNA contains a 2703 bp orf which encodes a polypeptide containing 900 amino acids. Overall, there is 75% identity in nucleotide sequence and 73% identity in amino acid sequence between mouse and human genes. The C-terminal half is more conserved (80%) than the N-terminal half (65%). Northern analysis has revealed a constitutive expression pattern for both human and mouse transcripts in various tissues examined. However, high level expression was observed in liver, testis and kidney in both species. The human XPC gene was cloned from a cosmid library and the full-length gene was found to span ~24 kb. Analysis of the genomic structure indicated that the transcribed sequence is divided into 15 exons.

INTRODUCTION

One of the principal DNA repair pathways that has the capacity for eliminating a wide range of structurally unrelated lesions is referred to as nucleotide excision repair (NER; for reviews see 1 - 4 ). Defects in NER have been shown to give rise to a number of human genetic syndromes which include xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne's syndrome (CS) and trichothiodystrohpy (TTD; 1 ). Eleven genetic complementation groups have been identified among these three syndromes and eight of these genes have now been cloned ( 3 , 5 ).

The XPC gene is believed to be involved in an early stage of the incision process. It is known that XPC forms a stable complex with the yeast RAD23 homologue HHR23B ( 6 ) and interacts with the transcription/repair factor TFIIH ( 7 , 8 ). The XPC gene binds non-specifically to single-stranded DNA with high affinity. Therefore, a plausible role for XPC is to stabilize the bubble structure, presumably created by the helicase activity of TFIIH, around the lesion. Unlike most other XP cells, XPC cells are deficient only in the overall genome repair while the preferential repair of the template strand of actively transcribed genes is normal ( 9 ). This suggests that XPC can be replaced by another factor(s) or is not required at the site of a stalled-RNA pol II complex. In a fully reconstituted in vitro NER system, Mu and colleagues were able to show that excision of lesions can occur with a certain substrate without XPC even in the absence of transcription ( 10 ). In order to elucidate the precise function of XPC it is important to analyze its peptide structure and to identify functional domains through sequence analysis of its homologues. Previously, we cloned the human XPC cDNA by functional complementation and found that XPC had significant homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad4 protein, particularly in the C-terminal end ( 11 ). Cloning of the Drosophila homologue of human XPC confirmed the homology to RAD4 ( 12 ). Additional homologues of XPC are required to define conserved and possibly functional domains. Analysis of the XPC gene structure will facilitate studies on the characterization of XPC mutations and on the control of its transcription. Here, we describe the cloning and characterization of the mouse XPC cDNA, the tissue- specific expression of the human and mouse transcripts, and the genomic structure of the human XPC gene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening of cDNA library and Northern hybridization

An 8 1/2 day C57BL mouse embryo cDNA library in vector [lambda]gt10 was screened with a human XPC probe. Pre-blotted nylon membranes with mouse and human polyA + RNA from multiple tissues were purchased from Clontech and each hybridized with random primed mouse and human XPC cDNA probes.

Sequence analysis

Sequence analysis was performed with the Bestfit program from the Genetics Computing Group (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI, USA). Other sequence analysis was performed with the Lasergene Navigator program (DNASTAR Inc.).

Isolation of XPC genomic sequence

A CEPH YAC library was screened by PCR ( 13 ). A cosmid library of the YAC DNA was constructed in the sCOS-1 vector ( 14 ).

RESULTS

Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the mouse XPC cDNA

Five clones from the screening of the cDNA library formed an overlapping contig and the merged DNA sequence of the mouse XPC covered residues 20-3220 relative to the human sequence. The mouse XPC gene encodes a transcript of ~3.8 kb based on Northern blot analysis (see below). We obtained 3030 bp of the cDNA sequence and the longest orf consists of 2703 bp, corresponding to a predicted polypeptide of 900 residues (GenBank accession no. U27398).

Comparison of the human and mouse XPC sequences

Human and mouse XPC share high levels of homology at both the nucleotide and amino acid sequence levels. Overall, the nucleotide sequences exhibit an 81% homology and the peptide sequences show a 74% identity and a 85% similarity. However, the C-terminal half of the XPC protein is more highly conserved than the N-terminal half (80.3% versus 66.3% identity). The extreme N-terminus is particularly unconserved which may explain why this region is dispensable in the human protein ( 6 ). The deduced mouse XPC polypeptide has a calculated molecular mass of 101 kDa.


Figure 1 . Northern blot analysis of XPC expression in various tissues. ( a ) Human XPC cDNA probe was hybridized with 2 [mu]g of polyA + RNA from each human tissue as indicated. ( c ) Mouse XPC cDNA probe was hybridized with 2 [mu]g of polyA + RNA from each mouse tissue as indicated. To control for loading, a human [beta]-actin probe was used to visualize [beta]-actin transcripts in each lane. ( b and d ) Autoradiograms from a and c were quantitiated by a scanning densitometer and relative XPC expression was normalized against [beta]-actin levels in each tissue. Expression levels in kidney and liver were designated as 100% in mouse and human, respectively.


Expression patterns of human and mouse XPC mRNAs

Expression of XPC transcripts in various tissues were examined by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1 ). Mouse XPC mRNA migrates at ~3.8 kb. Although both human and mouse XPC were expressed in all organs and tissue types examined, the level of transcription varied to a large extent. In both cases, when the signals were normalized by densitometry against an internal [beta]-actin control (Fig. 4 c and d), liver, testes and kidney were found to have much higher levels compared with cardiac, skeletal muscle, lung or brain.

Table 1 . Organization of mouse XPC exons

Exon

Position

Size (bp)

1

-105-102

208

2

103-299

197

3

300-412

113

4

413-520

108

5

521-779

259

6

780-900

121

7

901-990

90

8

991-1871

881

9

1872-2033

162

10

2034-2115

82

11

2116-2250

135

12

2251-2420

170

13

2421-2514

94

14

2515-2604

90

15

2605-3453

849

Genomic structure of human XPC gene

Screening by PCR of a CEPH genomic YAC library yielded nine clones. Five were found to contain the XPC 5' UTR as determined by Southern blotting. Further analysis by florescence in situ hybridization analysis (FISH) revealed two clones containing contiguous inserts. The length of the XPC gene (24 kb) and the restriction enzyme map were determined by Southern analysis (Fig. 2 ). Sequencing of DNA was performed to cover the entire coding sequence to elucidate the XPC genomic structure. The human XPC gene was found to be divided into a total of 15 exons (Table 1 ). Of the 14 donor/acceptor splice sites, 11 are consistent with the consensus AG/GT sequence, however, three are comprised of the sequences AG/GG, GA/AT and AT/GT.


Figure 2 . Genomic structure of the human XPC gene. ( a ) Exon-intron organization of the human XPC gene. Filled boxes indicate exons, open boxes indicate introns. Left and right arrows show positions of the initiation and termination codons respectively. ( b ) Restriction map of XPC gene: B, Bam HI; E, Eco RI; H, Hin dIII.

DISCUSSION

Recent analysis of excision repair at the level of the gene has indicated that XP-C cells are deficient in global repair, but not transcription coupled repair ( 9 ). In normal rodent cells, lesions in the template strand of actively transcribed genes are repaired efficiently, however, the non-transcribed portion of the genome is inefficiently repaired compared with human cells. These findings have led to the suggestion that XPC may not play an important role in NER in rodent cells. However, recent results have shown that an XPC knockout mouse is highly sensitive to the effects of UV irradiation ( 15 ). In addition, the data we present here show a high degree of homology (85% similarity) at the amino acid level between mouse and human XPC, suggesting that they are likely to have similar biochemical functions. Among all homologues of XPC sequenced to date, which include S.cerevisiae (RAD4; 16 ), Drosophila ( 12 ), mouse and human, the most highly conserved region lies between amino acid residues 517 and 867 in the human protein. Cloning of the mouse homologue will aid further efforts to identify highly conserved and functional domains in XPC.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank David Cheo for sharing his unpublished results and Craig Chinault for his assistance in isolating XPC YAC clones. The DNA sequencing was performed in the MDACC core facility supported by grant CA16672 from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI). This work was supported by grant CA52461 from NCI.

REFERENCES

1 Gietz,D. and Prakash,S. (1989) Gene, 74, 535-541. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Hoeijmakers,J.H. (1993) Trends Genet., 9, 173-177.

3 Hoeijmakers,J.H. (1993) Trends Genet., 9, 211-217.

4 Sancar,A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 15915-15918.

5 Henning,K.A., Li,L., Iyer,N., McDaniel,L.D., Reagan,M.S., Legerski,R.L., Schultz,R.A., Stefanini,M., Lehmann,A.R., Mayne,L. and Frieldberg,E.C. (1995) Cell, 82,555-564.

6 Masutani,C., Sugasawa,K., Yanagisawa,J., Sonoyama,T., Ui,M., Enomoto,T., Tkio,K., Tanaka,K., van der Spek,P.J., Bootsma,D., Hoeijmakers,J.H.J. and Hanaoka F. (1995) EMBO J., 13, 1831-1843.

7 Drapkin,R., Reardon,T., Ansari,A., Huang,J.C., Zawel,L., Ahn,K., Sancar,A. and Reinberg,D. (1994) Nature, 368,769-772.

8 Svejstrup,J.Q., Wang,Z., Feaver,W.J., Wu,X., Bushnell,D.A., Donahue,T.F., Friedberg,E.C. and Kornberg,R.D. Cell, 80, 21-28.

9 van Hoffen,A., Venema,J., Meschini,R., van Zeeland,A. and Mullenders,L. H. (1995) EMBO J., 14, 360-367.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Y. Zhu, M. Lai, H. Yang, J. Lin, M. Huang, H.B. Grossman, C. P. Dinney, and X. Wu
Genotypes, haplotypes and diplotypes of XPC and risk of bladder cancer
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 698 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K.-T. Hsia, M. R. Millar, S. King, J. Selfridge, N. J. Redhead, D. W. Melton, and P. T. K. Saunders
DNA repair gene Ercc1 is essential for normal spermatogenesis and oogenesis and for functional integrity of germ cell DNA in the mouse
Development, March 2, 2003; 130(2): 369 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. G. Khan, V. Muniz-Medina, T. Shahlavi, C. C. Baker, H. Inui, T. Ueda, S. Emmert, T. D. Schneider, and K. H. Kraemer
The human XPC DNA repair gene: arrangement, splice site information content and influence of a single nucleotide polymorphism in a splice acceptor site on alternative splicing and function
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2002; 30(16): 3624 - 3631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. G. Khan, E.J. Metter, R. E. Tarone, V. A. Bohr, L. Grossman, M. Hedayati, S. J. Bale, S. Emmert, and K. H. Kraemer
A new xeroderma pigmentosum group C poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2000; 21(10): 1821 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Chavanne, B. C. Broughton, D. Pietra, T. Nardo, A. Browitt, A. R. Lehmann, and M. Stefanini
Mutations in the XPC Gene in Families with Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Consequences at the Cell, Protein, and Transcript Levels
Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 60(7): 1974 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (46K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, L
Right arrow Articles by Legerski, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, L
Right arrow Articles by Legerski, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?