Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (84K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gu, X
Right arrow Articles by Santi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gu, X
Right arrow Articles by Santi, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1059-1064

Footnote

Interaction of tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase with NO 2 Ura-tRNA

Interaction of tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase with NO 2 Ura-tRNA Xiangrong Gu 1 , Akira Matsuda 2 , Kathryn M. Ivanetich 1,3 and Daniel V. Santi 1, *

1 Departments of Biochemistry and Biophysics and of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco , CA 94143-0448, USA , 2 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan and 3 Biomolecular Resource Center, University of California, San Francisco , CA 94143-0541, USA

Received December 7, 1995; Revised and Accepted February 6, 1996

ABSTRACT

tRNA in which uracil is completely replaced by 5-nitro-uracil was prepared by substituting 5-nitro-UTP for UTP in an in vitro transcription reaction. The rationale was that the 5-nitro substituent activates the 6-carbon of the Ura heterocycle towards nucleophiles, and hence could provide mechanism-based inhibitors of enzymes which utilize this feature in their catalytic mechanism. When assayed shortly after mixing, the tRNA analog, NO 2 Ura-tRNA, is a potent competitive inhibitor of tRNA-Ura methyl transferase (RUMT). Upon incubation, the analog causes a time-dependent inactivation of RUMT which could be reversed by dilution into a large excess of tRNA substrate. Covalent RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes could be isolated on nitrocellulose filters or by SDS-PAGE. The interaction of RUMT and NO 2 Ura-tRNA was deduced to involve formation of a reversible complex, followed by formation of a reversible covalent complex in which Cys 324 of RUMT is linked to the 6-position of NO 2 Ura 54 in NO 2 Ura-tRNA.

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase (RUMT) catalyzes the S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet)-dependent methylation of a specific Urd residue to form the m 5 U residue found in the T-loop of most prokaryotic and eukaryotic tRNA. The catalytic mechanism of RUMT is analogous to the mechanisms of thymidylate synthase (TS) and DNA-(m 5 C)-methyltransferase ( 1 - 3 ). The mechanism involves initial formation of a covalent Michael adduct between the thiol of Cys 324 of the enzyme and the 6-carbon of U54 of tRNA ( 2 , 4 ) which serves to activate the 5-position of U54 for the subsequent one-carbon transfer. We have previously reported that, in the absence of AdoMet, RUMT forms binary covalent complexes with unmodified tRNA Phe or synthetic tRNA Phe containing 5-fluoroUra substituted for Ura (FUra-tRNA), which may be isolated on nitrocellulose filters or by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) ( 5 ).

The inhibitory and substrate properties of a number of 5-substituted dUMPs with TS suggested that electron withdrawing groups at the 5-position increase the affinity of such analogs for the enzyme, probably through increasing the reactivity of the 6-carbon toward nucleophiles ( 6 - 8 ). Indeed, C-6 of the analog 5-nitro-2-deoxyuridine monophosphate (NO 2 dUMP) forms a sufficiently strong covalent attachment with thiols, that a covalent TS-NO 2 dUMP complex can be physically isolated ( 9 ). Although covalent, the TS-NO 2 dUMP complex is reversible, and free enzyme and inhibitor can be restored by [beta]-elimination of the enzyme from C-6 of the pyrimidine. It was reasonable to believe that other enzymes whose mechanisms involve covalent attachment of a nucleophilic catalyst to C-6 of pyrimidine substrates would likewise be inhibited by substrates containing the NO 2 Ura substituent. In this paper, we describe the synthesis and characterization of tRNA containing NO 2 Ura, and its potent mechanism-based inhibition of RUMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

General

5-Nitro-uridine triphosphate (NO 2 UTP) was prepared by a slight modification of the method of Huang and Torrence ( 10 ). Briefly, the trisodium salt of UTP (Yamasa, Choshi, Japan; 550 mg, 1 mmol) was mixed with a solution of nitronium tetrafluoroborate (Aldrich, 0.5 M, 10 ml) in sulfolane. The solution was stirred for 48 h at room temperature. Chloroform (50 ml) was added to the mixture, and the resulting precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed with chloroform (2 * 20 ml), and dissolved in water (20 ml). The pH of the solution was adjusted to ~7 by the addition of concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The solution was applied to a DEAE-cellulose A-200m column (Chisso, Japan; 2 * 30 cm), which was washed with 0.05 M triethylammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.9, 500 ml) and eluted with a linear gradient (0.05-0.25 M) of triethylammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.9, total volume 3 l). Appropriate triphosphate fractions were pooled, evaporated, and co-evaporated several times with water in vacuo to give NO 2 UTP (~20% yield as a yellow glass).

Plasmid p67YF0 used for preparation of unmodified yeast tRNA Phe was a gift from O. C. Uhlenbeck (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO). T7 RNA polymerase was isolated from E.coli BL21 harboring the plasmid pAR1219 (J. J. Dunn, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York). [5'- 32 P]pCp (3000 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham. [ 32 P]RNA was purified on urea-PAGE ( 11 ). RUMT was purified as previously described ( 12 , 13 ).


Figure 1 . Thermal denaturation curve for the tRNA transcripts. The relative absorbances at 260 nM for NO 2 Ura-tRNA and unmodified tRNA are plotted versus temperature. Each curve was best fit through more than 700 points. Methods are described in Materials and Methods.

RNA synthesis

T7 RNA polymerase-catalyzed in vitro synthesis of tRNA Phe containing 5-nitroUra substituted for Ura (NO 2 Ura-tRNA) was performed using Bst NI-digested p67YF0 and 100 [mu]M NO 2 UTP in place of 1 mM UTP as described ( 14 ). Products were purified using 7 M urea-20% PAGE. Unmodified tRNA, FUra-tRNA and m 5 U54-tRNA were prepared as described ( 5 ). The concentrations of tRNA and NO 2 Ura-tRNA were calculated using 1.6 nmol per 1 A 260 ( 15 ).

3 ' -Labeling of RNA

In vitro synthesized NO 2 Ura-tRNA was labeled at the 3'-end with T4 RNA ligase (New England Biolabs) and [5'- 32 P]pCp ( 16 ). The 3'-end-labeled tRNA was purified by electrophoresis on 7 M urea-12% PAGE.

Thermal melting profiles

The thermal denaturation profiles of tRNA were obtained using a Cary 3E spectrophotometer with a temperature controller and interfaced to a microcomputer. The temperature was increased from 25 to 95oC at a rate of 1oC/min. Ten data points were collected/min. The tRNA samples in 23 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.45, 45 mM KCl and 10 mM spermine ( 14 ), were heated to 95oC, then slowly cooled to room temperature prior to obtaining the thermal profiles.

Nitrocellulose binding assay

Reaction mixtures (20 [mu]l) containing 50 nM [ 32 P]NO 2 -Ura-tRNA and varying concentrations of RUMT (0.05-4 [mu]M) in binding buffer [50 mM N-tris (hydroxymethyl)-methyl-2-aminoethane sulfonic acid (TES), pH 6.6, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM NaCl] ( 2 ) were incubated at 15oC for 60 min, and assayed by nitrocellulose filtration ( 5 , 17 ). With saturating RUMT, ~50% of the NO 2 Ura-tRNA was trapped, which we assume represents the filtration efficiency for the combination of noncovalent and covalent complexes. The apparent dissociation constant (K app ) for NO 2 Ura-tRNA was obtained by nonlinear least-squares fit of the binding data to the equation:

RNA bound /RNA total = 1/(1 + K app /E total ) ( 5 ).

The nitrocellulose binding assay was used to determine the bimolecular rate constant (k 1 ) for association of RUMT and NO 2 Ura-tRNA to form isolable binary complexes. The [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA (1 nM) was incubated with specified concentrations of RUMT (50-150 nM) at 15oC in binding buffer. The initial rate was obtained from plots of bound RNA versus time over the first 10% of the reaction ( 5 ). The dissociation of total noncovalent plus covalent bound complexes was monitored by adding a large excess of unlabelled, unmodified tRNA to equilibrated RUMT-[ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes, and measuring the bound radioactivity by the nitrocellulose filtration assay with time. The rate constants were calculated from the half lives for dissociation of total noncovalent plus covalent complexes obtained from a plot of bound RNA versus time ( 5 ).

K app was obtained by non-linear least squares fit of the binding data in Figure 4 to an equation that calculates free ligand concentration after correction for depletion of NO 2 Ura-tRNA by complex formation ( 18 ).

Gel shift assay

Gel shift assays were performed as previously described ( 2 , 5 ). Reaction mixtures (400 [mu]l) containing 50 nM [ 32 P]NO 2 -Ura-tRNA (2 * 10 5 c.p.m.) and 8 [mu]M RUMT in binding buffer, were incubated at 15oC. Aliquots (20 [mu]l) were removed at the indicated times and the components were separated on SDS-12% PAGE. The 32 P-containing bands were excised, extracted and counted in 5 ml Aquasol II ( 5 ). Covalent complexes were quantitated as the fraction of total tRNA that was covalently bound.

Enzyme assay

Typically, reaction mixtures (20 [mu]l) containing 1 [mu]M unmodified tRNA, 25 [mu]M [ 3 H-Me]AdoMet (2 Ci/mmol) and 0.2 [mu]M RUMT in binding buffer were incubated at 15oC. An aliquot (18 [mu]l) was removed at a specified time for DEAE-paper disk assay ( 5 ). The assay efficiency was ~60% for 3 H-methyl incorporation into tRNA (data not shown).

Data

Data points in the figures represent duplicate determinations.

RESULTS

Preparation and characterization of NO 2 Ura-tRNA

NO 2 Ura-tRNA was prepared by T7 RNA polymerase-catalyzed in vitro transcription of the yeast tRNA Phe gene contained within p67YFO using NO 2 UTP instead of UTP. With NO 2 UTP, the reaction mixture yielded 0.5 A 260 of transcript/ml, which corresponds to 20 mol RNA/mol template. After the transcript was labeled with 5'- 32 pCp, analysis on 7 M urea-20% PAGE showed a major radioactive RNA product that migrated as did unmodified tRNA. Complete RNase T2 digestion of this labeled product followed by separation of the products on two-dimensional TLC showed that ~90% of the transcripts had the expected 3' terminal adenosine ( 19 ). NO 2 Ura-tRNA showed a sharp T m of 84 o C, which was 14oC higher than unmodified tRNA (Fig. 1 ).

Inactivation of RUMT by NO 2 Ura-tRNA

NO 2 Ura-tRNA was not methylated by RUMT (data not shown), but did inhibit the methylation of unmodified tRNA by RUMT. NO 2 Ura-tRNA was a competitive inhibitor with respect to tRNA when the reaction was initiated with enzyme (Fig. 2 ). The following constants were calculated from Figure 2 : K m = 0.37 [mu]M, k cat = 1.9 min -1 and K i = 1.0 [mu]M.


Figure 2 . Competitive inhibition of RUMT by NO 2 Ura-tRNA. Reaction mixtures (40 [mu]l) contained varying concentrations of unmodified tRNA and NO 2 Ura-tRNA, 25 [mu]M [ 3 H-Me]AdoMet (4 Ci/mmol) and 0.1 [mu]M RUMT in binding buffer. The reactions were initiated by adding enzyme. After incubation at 15oC for 1-2 min, aliquots (18 [mu]l) were removed for DEAE-paper disk assay. The NO 2 Ura-tRNA concentrations were zero ([circle]), 1 [mu]M (-) and 3 [mu]M ([squ]). The lines were derived from a weighted fit of the data to the Michaelis-Menten equation. Kinetic constants were derived from weighted fits of the lines to the Michaelis-Menten equation or the linear competitive inhibitor equation (22).

For time-dependent inhibition studies, RUMT was preincubated with NO 2 Ura-tRNA for the times indicated; at specified times, the solution was added to a standard assay mixture containing [ 3 H-Me]AdoMet and unmodified tRNA, and initial velocities were determined. There was a time-dependent pseudo first order loss of enzyme activity (k obs = 1.9 * 10 -3 s -1 ; Fig. 3 ). To demonstrate reversibility of the complex, 3.3 [mu]M NO 2 Ura-tRNA (15 * K app ) was preincubated with 0.33 [mu]M RUMT in binding buffer at 15oC for 30 min, then 30 [mu]M unmodified tRNA was added. Aliquots were removed with time, and mixed with [ 3 H-Me]AdoMet to determine the initial velocities. The activity of enzyme was restored following incubation of the NO 2 Ura-tRNA-RUMT complex with unmodified tRNA for 60 min (data not shown).


Figure 3 . Inactivation of RUMT by NO 2 Ura-tRNA. The preincubation mixtures (150 [mu]l) containing 1.25 [mu]M NO 2 Ura-tRNA and 0.25 [mu]M RUMT in binding buffer, were incubated at 15oC. Aliquots (32 [mu]l) were removed when specified and mixed with 8 [mu]l unmodified tRNA plus [ 3 H-Me]AdoMet (2 Ci/mmol) for measurement of the initial velocity of methylation. The final concentrations in initial velocity experiments were 1 [mu]M NO 2 Ura-tRNA, 0.2 [mu]M RUMT, 1 [mu]M unmodified tRNA and 25 [mu]M AdoMet. Aliquots (18 [mu]l) were removed at 1 and 2 min for the DEAE-paper disk assay ([circle]). Controls omitted NO 2 Ura-tRNA from the preincubation mixture ([squ]).


Figure 4 . Titration of NO 2 Ura-tRNA with RUMT. Fraction of NO 2 Ura-tRNA bound is plotted versus RUMT concentration. Reaction mixtures (20 [mu]l) containing 50 nM [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA (1.4 * 10 4 c.p.m.) and varying concentrations of RUMT (0.05-4 [mu]M) were incubated at 15oC for 60 min, and assayed by nitrocellulose filtration. Data are corrected for filtration efficiencies (see Results).

Interaction of NO 2 Ura-tRNA with RUMT

A minimal mechanism for the interaction of RUMT with NO 2 Ura-tRNA is proposed in Scheme 1 . First, there is reversible formation of the noncovalent RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA binary complex 1 characterized by rate constants k 1 and k- 1 and dissociation constant K 1 . Secondly, there is unimolecular conversion of 1 to one or more covalent complexes 2 characterized by apparent rate constants k 2 and k- 2 and apparent dissociation constant K 2 (K 2 = [noncovalent complex]/[covalent complex] = k -2 /k 2 ). We assessed these constants as described for the analogous RUMT-tRNA binary complexes ( 20 ).


Scheme 1


The apparent dissociation constant (K app ) for total RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes was determined by measurement of the fraction of bound NO 2 Ura-tRNA using a fixed concentration of [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA and a 1- to 80-fold molar excess of RUMT (Fig. 4 ) K app was 4-fold greater for NO 2 Ura-tRNA than for unmodified tRNA (Table 1 ). K app is described in terms of the equilibrium and kinetic constants of Scheme 1 by equations 1 and 2 .

Ka p p = (K1 K2) / (1 + K2)               1

Ka p p = [k-1 k-2] / [k1 (k-2 + k2)]               2

Nitrocellulose binding assay

A nitrocellulose filter binding assay commonly used to trap protein-RNA complexes was used to measure native noncovalent plus covalent RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes ( 5 ). In this assay, free [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA is almost completely removed (counts <150 c.p.m.) (data not shown). At an 80-fold excess of RUMT, 50% of the added NO 2 Ura-tRNA was trapped, which represents the filtration efficiency of the assay ( 21 ). This is slightly lower than the filtration efficiency (65%) for the RUMT-tRNA complex ( 5 ).

Rates of association of RUMT and NO 2 Ura-tRNA were measured by mixing excess RUMT with [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA, and counting the nitrocellulose-bound radioactivity. Initial rates were obtained over the first 10% of the reaction from plots of bound RNA versus time (Fig. 5 ), and k 1 values were calculated from the equation for a bimolecular reaction. The k 1 was 4-fold lower for NO 2 Ura-tRNA than for unmodified tRNA (Table 1 ).


Figure 5 . Time-dependent formation of complexes between RUMT and NO 2 Ura-tRNA. Mixtures of [ 32 P]NO 2 -Ura-tRNA (1 nM, 7 * 10 4 c.p.m.) and varying concentrations of RUMT (50-150 nM) in binding buffer (60 [mu]l) were incubated at 15oC. Aliquots (18 [mu]l) were filtered on nitrocellulose at the indicated times. RUMT concentration: ([circle]), 50 nM; (-), 100 nM; ([squ]), 150 nM.

The dissociation of total noncovalent plus covalent bound complexes was monitored by adding a 20-fold excess of unlabelled competitor tRNA to pre-formed, equilibrated RUMT-[ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes, and measuring the loss of bound radioactivity with time. As previously observed with RUMT-tRNA complexes ( 20 ), dissociation of the RUMT-[ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA complex was biphasic (Fig. 6 ). This occurs because the reaction is initiated from equilibrated covalent plus noncovalent complexes, and there is an initial relatively rapid depletion of noncovalent complex 1 (t 1/2 ~0.55 min), followed by slower depletion of covalent complexes 2 (t 1/2 ~21 min). The dissociation rate constants for the first and second phases, viz ., k -1 and k -2 respectively, were calculated from the half lives obtained from Figure 6 . The k -1 was 4-fold greater for NO 2 Ura-tRNA than for tRNA, while the k -2 values were comparable. Values for k -1 and k -2 were also calculated from corresponding rate constants for association and equilibrium constants. For both dissociation rate constants, the calculated and experimental values were in good agreement (Table 1 ).


Figure 6 . Dissociation of RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes. Reaction mixtures (190 [mu]l) containing 500 nM RUMT and 50 nM [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA (1.6 * 10 5 c.p.m.) in binding buffer were preincubated at 15oC for 60 min. Reactions were initiated by adding 10 [mu]l of 200 [mu]M of unlabelled, unmodified tRNA. Final concentrations were 0.0475 [mu]M [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA, 0.475 [mu]M RUMT and 10 [mu]M unmodified tRNA. Aliquots were removed at the indicated times for the nitrocellulose filter assay.

Table 1 . Formation of the RUMT binary complex a

NO 2 Ura-tRNA Phe

tRNA Phe b

k 1

1.7 * 10 4 M -1 s -1

6.5 * 10 4 M -1 s -1

k -1 c

21 * 10 -3 s -1

4.8 * 10 -3 s -1

k -1 d

(12 * 10 -3 s -1 )

(5.3 * 10 -3 s -1 )

K 1 e

(68 * 10 -8 M)

(8.2 * 10 -8 M)

k 2 f

14 * 10 -4 s -1

2.5 * 10 -4 s -1

k -2 c

5.3 * 10 -4 s -1

6.8 * 10 -4 s -1

k -2 g

(5.5 * 10 -4 s -1 )

(3 * 10 -4 s -1 )

K 2 h

0.39

1.2

K app i

19 * 10 -8 M

4.5 * 10 -8 M i

a Reactions were performed at pH 6.6 and 15oC. Values not in parentheses are from a single experiment. Values in parentheses were calculated from other constants. b Data for tRNA Phe is from reference (5). c Calculated from t 1/2 (data for NO 2 Ura-tRNA Phe from Fig. 6). d Calculated from k -1 = K 1 * k 1 . e From equation 1 . f From SDS-PAGE measurements of initial rate of covalent complex formation (data for NO 2 Ura-tRNA Phe from Fig. 7). g From k -2 = K 2 * k 2. h From SDS-PAGE measurements of [noncovalent]/[covalent] complexes at equilibrium (data for NO 2 Ura-tRNA Phe from Fig. 7). i From nitrocellulose filter measurements of total bound complex (data for NO 2 Ura-tRNA from Fig. 4).

Covalent RUMT-RNA complexes

Covalent RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes were assayed by an SDS-PAGE gel shift assay. As with RUMT-tRNA complexes, RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes show retarded migration on SDS-PAGE, compared with free tRNA ( 2 , 5 ). Figure 7 shows an experiment in which [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA was treated with excess RUMT (40* K app ), and aliquots removed at varying times for assay. The total enzyme-bound NO 2 Ura-tRNA was measured by the nitrocellulose filter assay, the covalent component was measured by the SDS-PAGE assay, and the noncovalent complex was estimated from the free NO 2 Ura-tRNA on SDS-PAGE. As indicated, the NO 2 Ura-tRNA was completely bound to RUMT throughout the experiment. The complex is initially composed only of noncovalent complex but with time, the noncovalent complex decreases to ~30% of the total bound tRNA, and the covalent complex increases to ~70% of the total (Fig. 7 ). At equilibrium, the ratio of noncovalently to covalently bound [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA, K 2 , was 0.4, which was 3-fold lower than that for unmodified tRNA (Table 1 ).


Figure 7 . Noncovalent and covalent complex formation between RUMT and NO 2 Ura-tRNA with time. Reaction mixtures (400 [mu]l) containing 50 nM [ 32 P]NO 2 Ura-tRNA (2 * 10 5 c.p.m.) and 8 [mu]M RUMT in methylation assay buffer were incubated at 15oC. Aliquots (20 [mu]l) were removed at the indicated times and assayed by nitrocellulose filtration (total complex, [squ]), and SDS-PAGE (covalent complex, -, noncovalent complex, [circle]).

The initial rates of formation of the covalent complexes were assessed by mixing NO 2 Ura-tRNA with an excess of RUMT (50 nM) at 15oC, and quantifying covalent complexes by SDS-PAGE at varying times (Fig. 7 ). With the concentrations of components used, the formation of noncovalent complexes was rapid, and k 2 could be measured as the appearance of covalent complex. The k 2 for NO 2 Ura-tRNA was ~6-fold greater than for unmodified tRNA (Table 1 ).


DISCUSSION

In the present work, we have described the in vitro synthesis of NO 2 Ura-tRNA, its partial characterization and its interaction with RUMT. The synthesis of NO 2 Ura-tRNA with complete substitution of NO 2 Ura for Ura was accomplished by substitution of NO 2 UTP for UTP in a standard plasmid-template directed in vitro synthesis reaction. The NO 2 Ura-tRNA was characterized by PAGE, 3'-nucleotide analysis and melting profile. Interestingly, the melting temperature of the analog was 14oC higher than tRNA which is probably due to the stability afforded by the higher acidity and therefore higher hydrogen bond forming ability of the 3-NH of NO 2 Urd residues.

Our studies demonstrated that NO 2 Ura-tRNA was a mechanism-based inhibitor of RUMT. As depicted in Scheme 1 , the interaction is proposed to involve the formation of a reversible, noncovalent enzyme-inhibitor complex, followed by the formation of a reversible covalent bond between a nucleophile of the enzyme and the 6-carbon of NO 2 Ura-tRNA at position 54. The proposed mechanism of inhibition is directly analogous to that previously established for interaction of NO 2 dUMP with thymidylate synthase (TS) ( 9 ).

The experimental evidence for the mechanism of interaction of NO 2 Ura-tRNA with RUMT is as follows. First, NO 2 Ura-tRNA initially inhibits the methylation activity of RUMT competitively with respect to the substrate tRNA (Fig. 2 ). This implicates formation of a reversible RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complex (Scheme 1 ) analogous to the normal RUMT-tRNA binary complex. Secondly, upon preincubation of RUMT with NO 2 Ura-tRNA, there is a time-dependent loss of enzyme activity (Fig. 3 ). The enzyme inactivation is consistent with conversion of the noncovalent complex to a much tighter complex, such as covalent complex 2 (Scheme 1 ). Scheme 2 shows the conversion of the reversible complex to the covalent complex. Thirdly, the kinetics of dissociation of the RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complexes are biphasic (Fig. 6 ), suggesting the presence of at least two distinct chemical species which we have assigned to the non-covalent and covalent forms of the complex ( 1 and 2 ). Finally, SDS-PAGE allows isolation of a RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA complex which is most consistent with covalent complex 2 . Since Cys 324 of RUMT has been identified as the covalent catalyst of the normal reaction with unmodified tRNA, it is most reasonable to suggest that the Cys 324 thiol is the enzyme nucleophile attached to NO 2 Ura-tRNA in the covalent complex.


Scheme 2


It is of interest to compare the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of RUMT binding to NO 2 Ura-tRNA versus tRNA. The initial noncovalent complex of RUMT with the NO 2 Ura-tRNA analog is tight, but is ~10-fold weaker than the RUMT-tRNA complex. This is caused by a 4-fold lower k on (k 1 ) and a 4-fold higher k off (k -1 ) (Table 1 ). Since the interaction of tRNA with RUMT probably requires a conformational change to expose the T-arm (X. R. Gu, unpublished results), these parameters may be explained by the higher stability of the tertiary structure of NO 2 Ura-tRNA, as reflected by its higher melting temperature (Fig. 1 ). The NO 2 Ura-tRNA noncovalent complex undergoes covalent bond formation (k 2 ) with the enzyme 6-fold faster than does the tRNA noncovalent complex, and the resultant covalent complex is ~3-fold more stable (K 2 ) (Table 1 ). Both effects may be explained by the electron withdrawing effects of the 5-NO 2 group on the electrophilicity of C-6, and the stability of resonance forms of 5-NO 2 -5,6-dihydro uracils ( 9 ). The latter may also explain why RUMT-catalyzed methylation of NO 2 Ura-tRNA by AdoMet does not occur.

In summary, NO 2 Ura-tRNA represents a mechanism-based inhibitor of RUMT which was designed on the basis of knowledge of the binding and mechanistic properties of the enzyme, the chemical properties of the inhibitor, and precedent from analogous studies of the interaction of a small molecule counterpart with TS. NO 2 Ura-tRNA is quite different from the other known inhibitor of RUMT, FUra-tRNA, in that it is not methylated at C-5. The relative simplicity of the RUMT-NO 2 Ura-tRNA interaction and the stability of the covalent complex indicates that NO 2 Ura-tRNA will be a useful tool for future investigation of this and other enzymes which bind nucleic acids.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by USPHS Grant CA-14394 from the National Institutes of Health (awarded to D.V.S.).

REFERENCES

1 Santi, D.V. and Danenberg, P.V. (1984) In Blakely, R.L. and Benkovic S.J. (eds) Folates and Pterins. Wiley, New York, Vol. 1, pp. 343-396.

2 Santi, D.V. and Hardy, L.W. (1987) Biochemistry, 26, 8599-8606. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Wu, J.C. and Santi, D.V. (1987) J. Biol. Chem., 262, 4778-4786. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Kealey, J.T. and Santi, D.V. (1991) Biochemistry, 30, 9724-9728. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Gu, X. and V., S.D. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 9788-9885.

6 Santi, D.V. and Sakai, T.T. (1971) Biochemistry, 10, 3598-3607. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Wataya, Y., Santi, D.V. and Hansch, C. (1977) J. Med. Chem., 20, 1469-1473. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Barr, P.J., Oppenheimer, P.J. and Santi, D.V. (1983) J. Biol. Chem., 258, 13627-13631. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Wataya, Y., Matsuda, A. and Santi, D.V. (1980) J. Biol. Chem., 255, 5538-5544. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Huang, G.F. and Torrence, P.T. (1977) J. Org. Chem., 42, 3821-3824. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Ogden, R.C. and Adams, D.A. (1987) Methods Enzymol., 152, 61-87. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Gu, X. and Santi, D.V. (1990) DNA Cell Biol., 9, 273-278. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Gu, X. and Santi, D.V. (1991) Protein Express. Purif. 2, 66-68.

14 Sampson, J.R. and Uhlenbeck, O.C. (1988) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1033-1037. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Stanley, W.M.J. (1974) Methods Enzymol., 29, 530-547. MEDLINE Abstract

16 England, T.E., Bruce, A.G. and Uhlenbeck, O.C. (1980) Methods Enzymol., 65, 65-74. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Santi, D.V., McHenry, C.S. and Perriard, E.R. (1974) Biochemistry, 13, 467-470. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Segel, I.H. (1975) Enzyme Kinetics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

19 Nishimura, S. (1979) In Shimmel, P.R., Soll, D. and Abelson, J. (eds) Transfer RNA. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 551-561.

20 Gu, X., Ofengand, J. and Santi, D.V. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 2255-2261. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Yarus, M. and Berg, P. (1970) Anal. Biochem., 35, 450-465.

22 Fersht, A. (1977) Enzyme Structure and Mechanism. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (84K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gu, X
Right arrow Articles by Santi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gu, X
Right arrow Articles by Santi, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?