Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (133K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1112-1118

Footnote

Orientation of functional activating regions in the Escherichia coli CRP protein during transcription activation at class II promoters

Orientation of functional activating regions in the Escherichia coli CRP protein during transcription activation at class II promoters Roy M. Williams 1 , Virgil A. Rhodius , Andrew I. Bell , Annie Kolb 1 and Stephen J.W. Busby*

School of Biochemistry, University of Birmingham, PO Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK and 1 Département de Biologie Moléculaire, Institut Pasteur, 25 Rue du Dr Roux, Paris 15, France

Received November 15, 1995; Revised and Accepted January 12, 1996

ABSTRACT

At class II CRP-dependent promoters the DNA site for CRP overlaps the DNA site for RNA polymerase, covering the -35 region. Transcription activation at class II CRP-dependent promoters requires a contact between an activating region in the upstream subunit of the bound CRP dimer and a contact site in the C-terminal domain of the [alpha] -subunit of RNA polymerase. Transcription activation is suppressed by amino acid substitutions in the activating region, but activation can be restored by second site substitutions at K52 or E96. These substitutions identify two separate regions on the surface of CRP that appear to be able to interact with RNA polymerase specifically at class II promoters. Using the method of `oriented heterodimers' we show that these alternative activating regions are functional in the downstream subunit of the bound CRP dimer.

INTRODUCTION

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is a well-characterized transcription activator triggered by cAMP and is responsible for the induction of more than 100 genes in E.coli (reviewed in 1 ). CRP is a dimer of two identical subunits and at target promoters it binds to 22 bp sequences. The crystal structure of the CRP-DNA complex has been determined; the complex is 2-fold symmetrical, with one subunit binding to one half of the 22 bp target and the second subunit binding to the other half ( 2 ).

The many promoters where CRP alone is sufficient for transcription activation can be categorized according to the position of the CRP binding site ( 3 , 4 ). At class I promoters CRP binds upstream of RNA polymerase, the paradigm being the E.coli lac promoter, where the CRP binding site is centred between 61 and 62 bp upstream from the transcription start site (-61.5). In contrast, at class II promoters the CRP binding site overlaps the -35 region and is centred at or near -41.5. Transcription activation at both classes of promoter involves a direct contact with RNA polymerase via a surface-exposed loop including CRP residues T158 and H159. This region (dubbed activating region 1) makes direct contact with a specific contact site in the C-terminal part of the RNA polymerase [alpha]-subunit ( 4 - 9 ).

Although CRP is a dimer with an activating region 1 in each subunit, experiments with `oriented heterodimers' have shown that only one activating region 1 is required for transcription activation ( 10 , 11 ). At class I promoters, where the bound CRP is located upstream of bound RNA polymerase, a functional activating region 1 is essential in the downstream CRP subunit, but not in the upstream subunit. In contrast, at class II promoters activating region 1 is functional in the upstream subunit of the bound CRP dimer, but not the downstream subunit ( 11 ). This is consistent with results from footprinting experiments on open complexes at class II promoters containing both CRP and RNA polymerase. These results suggest that RNA polymerase contacts the promoter DNA both upstream and downstream of the CRP dimer. Thus activating region 1 in the upstream subunit of the CRP dimer would be able to contact the C-terminal part of the RNA polymerase [alpha]-subunit, which is located just upstream of CRP ( 12 - 15 ).

Our recent genetic studies have suggested that other regions of CRP might also make contacts with RNA polymerase in open complexes at class II promoters. Working with a semi-synthetic CRP-dependent promoter with the DNA site for CRP centred at -41.5, CC(-41.5), we showed that the H159L substitution in activating region 1 suppressed activation, but that substitutions at K52 or E96 could reverse the suppression and reactivate CRP ( 5 , 16 , 17 ). Several lines of evidence led us to conclude that the substitutions at K52 or E96 unmask or improve alternative activating regions, rather than affecting activating region 1 directly. First, both K52 and E96 are located on the opposite face of the CRP monomer to activating region 1. Second, CRP activity could be increased by different substitutions at K52 or E96 and these substitutions could compensate for different defects in activating region 1 (R.Williams and V.Rhodius, unpublished results; 5 ). Remarkably, these substitutions affected activity only at class II promoters, such as CC(-41.5) , suggesting that they defined class-specific activating regions.

In this work we have used the method of `oriented heterodimers' ( 10 ) to show that the activating regions unmasked by the K52N and E96G substitutions are functional in the downstream, but not the upstream, subunit of the CRP dimer. Together with the observation that activating region 1 functions via the upstream subunit at class II promoters, this shows that RNA polymerase can make contact with both CRP subunits when the dimer is bound around -41.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The E.coli host strain used here was the [Delta] crp derivative of the [Delta] lac strain M182, as in our previous work ( 5 , 16 ). Recombinant plasmids and the different promoter fragments discussed here are listed in Table 1 . Standard methods for DNA manipulation and characterization were used throughout. Strains were propagated on MacConkey agar plates or in Lennox broth containing 25 [mu]g/ml tetracycline, 35 [mu]g/ml kanamycin or 80 [mu]g/ml ampicillin, as appropriate.

The CX(-41.5) , XC(-41.5) and CC(-61.5) promoters were derived from the starting CC(-41.5) promoter as shown in Figure 1 . All promoters were carried on Eco RI- Hin dIII fragments that could be cloned into pBR322 or M13mp19 for genetic manipulation or into the low copy number lac expression vector pRW50 for measurement of promoter strength in vivo . [beta]-Galactosidase activity was determined by the Miller protocol, exactly as in our previous work ( 5 , 16 ).

Table 2 lists the crp derivatives discussed in this study and their origin. Fragments carrying crp could be shuttled between plasmids pDCRP and pDW300. Note that these plasmids are compatible and carry different antibiotic resistance determinants, permitting the simultaneous introduction of two different types of CRP into the [Delta] crp host. Fragments carrying different derivatives of crp were also shuttled into M13mp19 and the recombinants used for site-directed mutagenesis using the Amersham Oligonucleotide-directed Kit (catalogue no. RPN1523). After mutagenesis the complete sequence of the new crp derivative was checked prior to recloning in pDCRP or pDW300.

For in vitro studies CRP H159L and CRP E181V H159L K52N were purified by the Ghosaini method ( 20 ). Subunit exchange reactions to generate heterodimers and abortive initiation experiments to assay the activity of resulting heterodimers at CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) were performed as described by Zhou et al. ( 10 , 11 ).


Figure 1 . Sequence of the CC(-41.5) , CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) promoters. The figure shows the base sequence of the upper strand of the CC(-41.5) promoter from the transcript start at +1 to upstream of the DNA site for CRP. The 22 bp DNA consensus site for CRP, CC, centred between bp -41 and -42 (-41.5), is underlined, with the principal recognition elements, TGTGA/TCACA, in bold type. The -10 hexamer sequence is double underlined and is also in bold type. The altered DNA sites for CRP in the CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) derivatives are shown below. Each derivative carries a single base pair substitution, changing the recognition element in half of the DNA site for CRP from TGTGA/TCACA (C) to TGTAA/TTACA (X). Each promoter was cloned on an Eco RI- Hin dIII fragment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Substitutions at K52 and E96 increase CRP activity at the CC(-41.5) promoter

As a model class II promoter we have used CC(-41.5) , which carries a 22 bp synthetic consensus CRP binding sequence cloned upstream of the melR transcription start site, with the CRP binding sequence centred at -41.5 (Table 1 and Fig. 1 ). This promoter was cloned on an Eco RI- Hin dIII fragment. To monitor CRP-dependent transcription activation this fragment was cloned into the broad host range lac expression vector pRW50, transferred to a [Delta] crp [Delta] lac strain and different CRP derivatives were introduced in the plasmid pDCRP. The data in Table 3 confirm that expression from CC(-41.5) is dependent on CRP and that it is greatly reduced by the H159L substitution. Expression from CC(-41.5) is restored by addition of the K52N or E96G substitutions, the former being more effective. Inspection of the structure of CRP shows that H159, K52 and E96 are distant from each other ( 2 ) and thus they are likely to act independently. In agreement with this, combination of the K52N and E96G substitutions leads to extra activation at CC(-41.5) . Additionally, we measured the effects of the K52N and E96G changes in wild-type CRP in the absence of the H159L substitution. The data in Table 3 show that both changes lead to a substantial increase in activation at CC(-41.5) , showing that the `patches' improved or unmasked by the K52N or E96G substitutions can function independently of H159L. As in our previous work ( 5 , 17 ), neither the K52N nor the E96G substitution has any effect on the activity of CRP (with or without H159L) at CC(-61.5) , a model class I promoter derived from CC(-41.5) by the introduction of a 20 bp linker that moves the centre of the CRP binding site to -61.5 (Table 1 ).

Oriented heterodimers: in vivo experiments

Our approach has several steps and is illustrated in Figure 2 . First, we constructed heterodimers consisting of one non-functional CRP subunit with wild-type DNA binding specificity (recognizing the motif 5'-TGTGA-3') and one functional subunit with a non-wild-type DNA binding specificity (due to the E181V substitution in the DNA recognition helix of CRP that allows binding to 5'-TGTAA-3'). In these experiments the non-functional CRP subunit carried the H159L substitution that disrupts activating region 1. The functional subunit carried either wild-type activating region 1 or inactivated activating region 1 (due to H159L) together with the suppressor substitution K52N or E96G. Second, we oriented the resulting heterodimers at the CC(-41.5) promoter by the use of derivatives having CRP binding sites consisting of one wild-type half-site and one non-wild-type half-site. Third, we measured the ability of each oriented heterodimer to activate transcription.

Table 1 . Plasmids and promoters used in this work
Plasmid/promoter

Characteristics

Reference

Plasmids

RK2 replication origin encoding Tet R

pRW50

Broad host range lac expression vector with no inserted promoter

Lodge et al. (18)

ColE1 replication origin encoding Amp R

pDCRP and derivatives

crp and derivatives cloned under control of crp promoter

Bell et al. (16)

pDU9

pDCRP with crp gene replaced by M13mp8 polylinker

Bell et al. (16)

pSC101 replication origin encoding Kan R

pLG339

Low copy number cloning vector

Stoker et al . (19)

pDW300 and derivatives

Wild-type or mutant crp from pDCRP and derivatives

West et al . (17)

cloned into pLG339

Promoters (all on Eco RI- Hin dIII fragments cloned into plasmid pRW50)

CC(-41.5)

Derivative of E. coli melR promoter with consensus `CC'

Gaston et al . (13)

CRP binding site centred between bp -41 and -42 (-41.5)

(Fig. 1)

upstream of transcript start

CX(-41.5)

Derivative of CC(-41.5) with `CX' CRP binding site

Zhou et al . (11)

XC(-41.5)

Derivative of CC(-41.5) with `XC' CRP binding site

Zhou et al . (11) (Fig. 1)

CC(-61.5)

Derivative of CC(-41.5) promoter with 20 bp linker

Gaston et al . (13)

inserted between -10 region and CRP binding site.

Class I derivative of CC(-41.5) with CRP binding site

centred at -61.5 upstream of transcript start

In previous papers (5,16) CC(-41.5) and CC(-61.5) were referred to as CC pmelR and CC+20 pmelR respectively. The nomenclature here has been altered to harmonize with Zhou et al. (7,11).

Table 2 . CRP derivatives used in this work (encoded by Sal I- Bam HI fragments cloned in pDCRP or pDW300)
CRP derivative

Properties

Source

CRP

Wild-type CRP

Bell et al. (16)

CRP H159L

CRP with defective activating region 1

Bell et al. (16)

CRP H159L K52N

CRP H159L plus suppressor substitution K52N

Bell et al. (16)

CRP H159L E96G

CRP H159L plus suppressor substitution E96G

West et al. (17)

CRP H159L K52N E96G

CRP H159L plus combined suppressors

This study a

CRP K52N

CRP carrying `up' substitution K52N

Bell et al. (16)

CRP E96G

CRP carrying `up' substitution E96G

This study a

CRP K52N E96G

CRP carrying combined `up' substitutions

This study a

CRP E181V

CRP with non-wild-type binding specificity

This study a

CRP E181V H159L

CRP E181V with defective activating region 1

This study a

CRP E181V H159L K52N

CRP E181V with defective activating region 1 plus

This study a

suppressor substitution K52N

CRP E181V H159L E96G

CRP E181V with defective activating region 1 plus

This study a

suppressor substitution E96G

a Made using the Amersham Oligonucleotide-directed Mutagenesis Kit (catalogue no. RPN 1523).

Table 3 . Transcription activation by CRP at CC(-41.5) and CC(-61.5)
pDCRP derivative

[beta]-Galactosidase expression in M182[Delta] crp cells

CC(-41.5) cloned

CC(-61.5) cloned

in pRW50 lac vector

in pRW50 lac vector

pDU9

5

5

pDCRP

550

550

pDCRP H159L

40

20

pDCRP H159L K52N

1900

20

pDCRP H159L E96G

400

20

pDCRP H159L K52N E96G

4000

25

pDCRP K52N

4000

400

pDCRP E96G

2500

600

pDCRP K52N E96G

6100

400

[beta]-Galactosidase levels were measured in extracts of exponentially growing cells and are expressed in standard Miller units. Cells were grown in Lennox broth supplemented with 25 [mu]g/ml tetracycline and 80 [mu]g/ml ampicillin. Each assay was performed at least five times on independent clones.


Figure 2 . Oriented heterodimers. The figure shows the binding of different CRP heterodimers to the CX(-41.5) ( A , C and E ) and the XC(-41.5) promoters ( B , D and F ). CRP with wild-type DNA binding specificity but a non-functional activating region 1 due to the H159L substitution is shown as a shaded box, whilst CRP with altered DNA binding specificity due to the E181V change is shown as an open box. ( A , B ) Heterodimers of CRP H159L/CRP E181V; ( C , D ) heterodimers of CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L; ( E , F ) heterodimers of CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L K52N or E96G. Functional activating region 1 is shown as a filled semi-circle marked H159, whilst inactive activating region 1 is shown as an open semi-circle marked L159. The activating regions identified by the K52N and E96G substitutions are shown as filled triangles.To orient the CRP H159L/CRP E181V, CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L K52N and CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L E96G heterodimers we used the CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) promoter derivatives in which one of the two half-sites for CRP binding is replaced by a DNA half-site with A:T at position 7 (the `X' half-site, Figs 1 and 2 ). Zhou and collaborators ( 11 ) have shown that heterodimers bind to these promoters in an assymmetrically oriented fashion, since the non-functional CRP H159L can bind with high affinity to the wild-type half-site (C) but not to the non-wild-type half-site (X). Figure 2 shows that at CX(-41.5) each heterodimer will be oriented such that the potentially functional subunit is the downstream subunit (Fig. 2 A and E), whilst at XC(-41.5) the potentially functional subunit is the upstream one (Fig. 2 B and F). In control experiments we analysed activation by CRP E181V, CRP E181V H159L K52N and CRP E181V H159L E96G homodimers, expecting that these would bind in an unoriented fashion at CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) , since CRP E181V binds with similar affinities to wild-type and non-wild-type DNA half-sites.


Figure 3 . Molecular model of the CRP dimer bound to target DNA. The crystallographic coordinates of the CRP-DNA complex at 3 Å resolution (2) were obtained from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (accession no. 1CGP). The image was generated and recorded on a Silicon Graphics 4D120 console using the program Quanta MSI. The figure shows a side-on view of the space filling model with the upstream and downstream CRP subuits coloured light blue and green respectively. The T158 and H159 side chains on the upstream CRP subunit are coloured purple and the K52 and E96 side chains on the downstream CRP subunit are coloured red and yellow respectively. At class II promoters we propose that RNA polymerase makes contacts with the region around T158/H159 in the upstream subunit and regions around K52 and E96 in the downstream subunit.

For in vivo experiments we constructed strains that co-express CRP H159L on a high copy plasmid (the pDCRP family based on pBR322) and CRP E181V and derivatives on a low copy plasmid (the pDW300 family based on pLG339). In such strains we analysed transcription activation at CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) cloned in a lac expression vector, by measuring [beta]-galactosidase expression. The results are listed in Table 4 . Both CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L K52N and CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L E96G heterodimers were active at CX(-41.5) but hardly active at XC(-41.5) . From this we conclude that the activating patches unmasked or improved by the K52N or E96G substitutions can function in the promoter-proximal but not the promoter-distal subunit of the CRP dimer. In contrast, CRP H159L/CRP E181V heterodimers are active at XC(-41.5) but inactive at CX(-41.5) , confirming the finding of Zhou et al . ( 11 ) that activating region 1 can function only in the upstream subunit of the CRP dimer at class II promoters such as CC(-41.5) .

Oriented heterodimers: in vitro experiments

Following protocols devised by Zhou et al . ( 10 , 11 ), we performed complementary in vitro experiments with purified CRP E181V H159L K52N. An excess of CRP H159L was mixed with CRP E181V H159L K52N such that the two species present in the mixture would be CRP H159L homodimers and CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L K52N heterodimers. Since the homodimers are inactive and bind poorly to the CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) templates, they do not affect the analysis and the activity of the heterodimeric species can be assayed by abortive initiation at the two test promoters. The results in Table 5 show that CRP H159L/CRP E181V H159L K52N heterodimers are active at CX(-41.5) but hardly active at XC(-41.5) , supporting the conclusion that the positive effect of the K52N substitution on transcription activation is via the downstream subunit of the CRP dimer.

Conclusions

Footprinting studies on open complexes at a number of class II CRP-dependent promoters (where the CRP binding site is centred at or near -41.5) have shown that RNA polymerase makes important contacts both upstream and downstream of bound CRP ( 12 - 15 ). Such an organization suggests that CRP could make multiple contacts with RNA polymerase, in contrast to the situation at class I promoters, where CRP binds further upstream and the sole contact appears to be between activating region 1 of CRP and a contact site in the C-terminal region of the [alpha]-subunit of RNA polymerase ( 4 , 9 - 11 ). Some evidence for multiple contacts comes from the effects of substitutions at K52 and E96, which appear to unmask (or improve) `patches' that are able to interact with RNA polymerase only at class II promoters ( 5 , 16 , 17 ). Since K52 and E96 are distant from activating region 1 in the CRP structure, this raises the question of how RNA polymerase could simultaneously contact the regions around H159, K52 and E96. To explain this Williams et al. ( 5 ) noted that in the CRP dimer the surface-exposed loop carrying H159 in one CRP subunit was directly adjacent to a second surface-exposed loop carrying K52 on the neighbouring face of the second adjacent subunit. They proposed that RNA polymerase would make contact with the two different neighbouring faces of CRP as it stretched to make contacts both upstream and downstream of CRP. The present results provide strong support for this proposal, showing that each contact site is active in just one subunit of the CRP dimer and fixing the orientation of the different contact points. Figure 3 shows a space filling model of the CRP dimer bound to a target site, with the locations of H159, K52 and E96 highlighted. Zhou et al. ( 11 ) previously showed that the activating region around H159 is functional only in the upstream subunit of the CRP dimer. Here we have shown that the regions around K52 and E96 are active only in the downstream subunit. Because of the 2-fold symmetry in the CRP dimer, the two adjacent faces of CRP shown in Figure 3 are different: the simplest model (sketched in Fig. 4 ) would suggest that at class II promoters RNA polymerase lies alongside these two different adjacent faces making different contacts with each surface. In this model the lack of effect of the K52N and E96G substitutions at class I promoters is easy to understand. At class I promoters it is the region around H159 in the downstream subunit of the CRP dimer that makes contact with the [alpha]-subunit ( 10 , 11 ); the regions around K52 and E96 will be displayed on the adjacent face of the upstream subunit and, presumably, cannot be reached by RNA polymerase.


Figure 4 . Proposed organization of different CRP and RNA polymerase subunits at class II promoters. The figure shows that the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase [alpha]-subunit ([alpha]CTD, joined to the N-terminal domain, [alpha]NTD, by a flexible linker; 25) binds upstream of the CRP dimer and makes contact with activating region 1 (AR1) in the upstream CRP subunit. The downstream subunit of the CRP dimer makes contacts with other parts of RNA polymerase via the activating regions defined by the E96G and K52N substitutions. The sigma subunit is shown making contact with the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter and is likely to contact the CRP region near K52 (see text).

Our model for CRP action at class II promoters envisages that dimeric CRP can make three different interactions with RNA polymerase. The pressing problem is to dissect the precise role of the three contact sites at different class II promoters. Current evidence suggests that activating region 1 in the upstream CRP subunit makes contact with the C-terminal domain of the [alpha]-subunit that binds upstream of bound CRP ( 4 , 9 , 11 , 15 ). As yet the contact sites in RNA polymerase for the regions around K52 and E96 are unproven, although the location of K52 in the downstream subunit, right next to the -35 sequence, suggests that the [sigma]-subunit could be involved. Indeed, on the basis of the effects of deletions in the [sigma]-subunit, Kumar et al. ( 21 ) proposed a role for segments of the C-terminal region in contacts at class II promoters and this is supported by photo-crosslinking experiments reported by Jin et al . ( 22 ).

Table 4 . Transcription activation by oriented heterodimers at CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) : in vivo data [beta]-Galactosidase expression
Binding-competent CRP dimer

CX(-41.5)

XC(-41.5)

CX / XC

Heterodimer experiments

H159L/E181V

10

400

0.025

H159L/E181V H159L

5

5

1

H159L/E181V H159L K52N

170

10

17

H159L/E181V H159L E96G

80

13

6

Control experiments

E181V/E181V

150

150

1

E181V H159L/E181V H159L

5

5

1

E181V H159L K52N/E181V H159L K52N

270

230

1.2

E181V H159L E96G/E181V H159L E96G

100

100

1.0

[beta]-Galactosidase activities were measured in M182[Delta] crp cells carrying CX(-41.5) or XC(-41.5) cloned in pRW50 plus different plasmids carrying crp derivatives. In the experiments in the upper half of the table CRP H159L was encoded by a derivative of pDCRP and CRP E181V derivatives were encoded by pDW300 derivatives. In the lower half of the table CRP E181V derivatives were encoded by pDW300 derivatives and the control plasmid pDU9 was also present. Cells were grown in Lennox broth containing ampicillin, tetracycline and kanamycin. All data points were measured at least five times on independent transformants. The phenotypes of transformants on MacConkey lactose plates were consistent with the assay data.

Table 5 . Transcription activation by oriented heterodimers at CX(-41.5) and XC(-41.5) : in vitro data
Binding-competent CRP dimer

Abortive initiation product

(pmol UMP incorporated/nmol template/min)

CX(-41.5)

XC(-41.5)

CX / XC

H159L/E181V H159L K52N

130

13

10

E181V H159L K52N/E181V H159L K52N

197

101

2

H159L/H159L

27

45

0.6

Synthesis of 32 P-labelled ApUpU was measured after 15 min incubations at 37oC. Reaction mixtures contained 0.25 nM DNA, 0.5 mM ApU, 50 nM [[alpha]- 32 P]UTP, 40 nM RNA polymerase holoenzyme, 10 nM CRP H159L (where shown) and 1 nM CRP E181V H159L K52N (where shown). Independent experiments were performed three times and data were corrected for CRP-independent product formation (~30 pmol UMP incorporation/nmol template/min).

Finally, it is pertinent to consider whether our model is relevant to other positively controlled promoters where the activator binding site overlaps the -35 region of the promoter. An interesting case is the group of E.coli promoters controlled by FNR, a transcription factor essential for gene induction during anaerobic adaptation. FNR shares sequence homologies with CRP, is likely to share a similar structure and, like CRP, is functional as a dimer that binds to 22 bp sequences ( 23 ). At most target promoters the DNA site for FNR is centred near position -41.5. After characterizing substitutions in FNR that reduce transcription activation but do not affect DNA binding Bell and Busby ( 24 ) concluded that the principal activating region of FNR was located in the surface-exposed loop around residue G85, which is homologous to the surface-exposed loop in CRP around K52. Using `oriented heterodimers' Bell and Busby showed that only one functional activating region was necessary for transcription activation by FNR and that this was located in the downstream subunit of the bound dimer. The striking similarity between CRP and FNR suggests that the two proteins might share similar contact sites with RNA polymerase (in this case possibly a contact with the [sigma]-subunit via the downstream subunit). Our current data suggest that FNR lacks an equivalent of the CRP activating region around E96, raising the possibility that different factors in the CRP/FNR family use different combinations of potential contact sites.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by BBSRC project grants to SB, a bursary to RW from the French Ministry of Education and a Wellcome studentship to VR. We thank Richard Ebright for numerous stimulating discussions about this work and for freely communicating his results prior to publication.

REFERENCES

1 Kolb,A., Busby,S., Buc,H., Garges,S. and Adhya,S. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 62, 749-795. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Schultz,S., Shields,G. and Steitz,T. (1991) Science, 253, 1001-1007.

3 Ushida,C. and Aiba,H. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 6325-6330. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Ebright,R. (1993) Mol. Microbiol., 8, 797-802. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Williams,R., Bell,A., Sims,G. and Busby,S. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 6705-6712. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Zhou,Y., Zhang,X. and Ebright,R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 6081-6085. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Zhou,Y., Merkel,T. and Ebright,R. (1994) J. Mol Biol., 243, 603-610. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Chen,Y., Ebright,Y. and Ebright,R. (1994) Science, 265, 90-92. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Ishihama,A. (1993) J. Bacteriol., 175, 2483-2489. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Zhou,Y., Busby,S. and Ebright,R. (1993) Cell, 73, 375-379. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Zhou,Y., Pendergrast,P., Bell,A., Williams,R., Busby,S. and Ebright,R. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 4549-4557. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Busby,S., Spassky,A. and Chan,B. (1987) Gene, 53, 145-152. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Gaston,K., Bell,A., Kolb,A., Buc,H. and Busby,S. (1990) Cell, 62, 733-743. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Kolb,A., Igarashi,K., Ishihama,A., Lavigne,M., Buckle,M. and Buc,H. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 319-326. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Attey,A., Belyaeva,T., Savery,N., Hoggett,J., Fujita,N., Ishihama,A. and Busby,S.(1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4375-4380. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Bell,A., Gaston,K., Williams,R., Chapman,K., Kolb,A., Buc,H., Minchin,S., Williams,J. and Busby,S. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 7243-7250. MEDLINE Abstract

17 West,D., Williams,R., Rhodius,V., Bell.,A., Sharma,N., Zou,C., Fujita,N., Ishihama,A. and Busby,S. (1993) Mol. Microbiol., 10, 789-797. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Lodge,J., Fear,J., Busby,S., Gunasekaran,P. and Kamini,N.-R. (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 95, 271-276.

19 Stoker,N., Fairweather,N. and Spratt,B. (1982) Gene, 18, 335-341. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Ghosaini,L., Brown,A. and Sturtevant,J. (1988) Biochemistry, 27, 5727-5261.

21 Kumar,A., Grimes,B., Fujita,N., Makino,K., Malloch,R., Hayward,R. and Ishihama,A. (1994) J. Mol. Biol., 235, 405-413. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Jin,R., Sharif,K. and Krakow,J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 19213-19216. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Spiro,S. and Guest,J. (1990) FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 75, 399-428.

24 Bell,A. and Busby,S. (1994) Mol. Microbiol., 11, 383-390. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Blatter,E., Ross,W., Tang,H., Gourse,R. and Ebright,R. (1994) Cell, 78, 889-896. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
N. J. Savery, G. S. Lloyd, S. J. W. Busby, M. S. Thomas, R. H. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse
Determinants of the C-Terminal Domain of the Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase {alpha} Subunit Important for Transcription at Class I Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein-Dependent Promoters
J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2002; 184(8): 2273 - 2280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Tanigawa, M. Shirokane, S.-i. Maeda, T. Omata, K. Tanaka, and H. Takahashi
Transcriptional activation of NtcA-dependent promoters of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 by 2-oxoglutarate invitro
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4251 - 4255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. A. Bown, A. Kolb, C. F. Meares, A. Ishihama, S. D. Minchin, and S. J. W. Busby
Positioning of Region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase sigma 70 Subunit by a Transcription Activator
J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2000; 182(10): 2982 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. L. Meibom, B. H. Kallipolitis, R. H. Ebright, and P. Valentin-Hansen
Identification of the Subunit of cAMP Receptor Protein (CRP) That Functionally Interacts with CytR in CRP-CytR-mediated Transcriptional Repression
J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2000; 275(16): 11951 - 11956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Malecki, A. Polit, and Z. Wasylewski
Kinetic Studies of cAMP-induced Allosteric Changes in Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein from Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2000; 275(12): 8480 - 8486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
V. Podolny, E. C. C. Lin, and A. Hochschild
A Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Mutant That Constitutively Activates an Escherichia coli Promoter Disrupted by an IS5 Insertion
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 1999; 181(24): 7457 - 7463.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Passner and T. A. Steitz
The structure of a CAP-DNA complex having two cAMP molecules bound to each monomer
PNAS, April 1, 1997; 94(7): 2843 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Tanigawa, M. Shirokane, S.-i. Maeda, T. Omata, K. Tanaka, and H. Takahashi
Transcriptional activation of NtcA-dependent promoters of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 by 2-oxoglutarate invitro
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4251 - 4255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (133K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?