Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (50K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, P
Right arrow Articles by Kryzosiak, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, P
Right arrow Articles by Kryzosiak, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1177-1179

Footnote

PCR-SSCP-HDX analysis of pooled DNA for more rapid detection of germline mutations in large genes. The BRCA1 example

PCR-SSCP-HDX analysis of pooled DNA for more rapid detection of germline mutations in large genes. The BRCA1 example Piotr Kozlowski , Krzysztof Sobczak , Marek Napierala , Marcin Wozniak , Jakub Czarny and Wlodzimierz J. Krzyzosiak*

Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan , Poland

Received September 12, 1995; Revised and Accepted January 29, 1996

Several reports from laboratories involved in the isolation of the BRCA1 gene, and recently in the search for its mutations ( 1 - 5 ), show that the latter activity is not a simple task. Every fragment of coding sequence of this multi-exon gene has to be analysed as sequence variations may occur anywhere ( 6 ). Let us consider then some technical problems related to wide-scale screening of large genes for scattered germline mutations taking BRCA1 as an example. Usually all BRCA1 exons, together with flanking intron sequences or cDNA fragments, are sequenced directly. It is, however, labour intensive. Alternatively, they are first screened by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) ( 7 ) to increase throughput of analysis. In the case of BRCA1 ~50 different gene fragments are analysed by SSCP and reamplified pure mutant species are sequenced. It is also our experience (J. Czarny et al. , in preparation), that this approach becomes very laborious, if a large number of chromosomes is to be tested. As no more reliable technology for large scale mutation screening is at hand now, we took some measures to increase the throughput of SSCP analysis without compromising its ability to detect mutations. Assuming that the frequency of BRCA1 mutations is 0.5% in the general population ( 3 ) screening of 200 individuals would give, on average, a single mutation. Detecting this mutation would require running 200 SSCP gels (one gene fragment from 50 individuals on one gel and 50 gene fragments analysed). The question we addressed in this study was how to cut this number by a factor of 10 or more.

First, we have analysed the possibility of doing PCR-SSCP assay on genomic DNA pools of various size. The optimum number of individual DNA samples to include in a pool is determined by the ability of detecting variant SSCP bands by autoradiography. To test the limits of pooling, the genomic DNA samples from different individuals were mixed together and subjected to PCR followed by SSCP analysis which is in fact the SSCP-heteroduplex (HDX) analysis in the conditions we use. For these experiments we have included the genomic DNA from patients in which mutations or polymorphisms in BRCA1 were earlier found and carefully characterised (J. Czarny et al., in preparation). It turned out that in pools composed of four to five DNA samples, fragments containing germline mutations could be easily detected.

In the case of germline mutations, one copy of the gene has a wild-type sequence and the other contains a mutation. According to our experience this fraction of mutant DNA, when present in a variant SSCP band, can be detected even when diluted 40 times with the signal from the wild-type sequence. However, in conditions of SSCP analysis, one or both DNA strands very often form not a single but two or more unevenly represented stable conformers showing different mobility. In the worst case, a new conformer created by a mutation may contribute 5% or even less to the overall radioactivity signal. To detect such less prominent signals, the number of DNA samples combined in a pool should not be higher than four to five. Otherwise they are barely discernible and could be missed. There are also other examples where mutation does not change the gel migration of any of the single strand conformers but the mobility of the heteroduplex formed is different. This is sometimes observed in cases of very small insertion and deletion mutations. The influence of DNA pooling on the ability of detecting these less prominent variant bands is shown in Figure 1 .


Figure 1 . SSCP-HDX analysis of BRCA1 fragments amplified from pooled genomic DNA samples. ( A ) 2430 T/C polymorphism in fragment 13 of exon 11. ( B ) 4152 del A mutation in fragment 26 of exon 11. Each set of seven lanes contains: C, SSCP pattern of pure, more frequent allele 2430 T (A) and fragment 11.26 with the wild-type sequence (B); 1X, SSCP patterns of heterozygote 2430 T/C (A) and heterozygote with 4152 del A mutation in one allele (B); 2X-8X, SSCP patterns of PCR products obtained from pooled genomic DNAs. The DNA samples denoted 1X were mixed prior to PCR with genomic DNA from two, four, six and eight independent individuals homozygous for more frequent allele (A) or having only the wild-type sequence (B) at the analysed loci. The upper part of the autoradiograms shows the region of single strand conformers. In (A) the arrowhead indicates the variant band specific for the rare allele. In the lower part of autoradiograms the region of homo- and heteroduplexes is shown. Heteroduplex showing slower migration in (B) is marked by arrowhead. All genomic DNA samples isolated from blood lymphocytes were at a concentration of 50 ng/[mu]l. For SSCP analysis PCR was done with 32 P-labeled primers. The primer sequences were: F- 5'-AAA CAG TTA AAG TGT CTA ATA ATG C and R-5'-GCA CAC TGA CTC ACA CAT TT in the case of fragment 11.13 and F-5'-TGA CTG CAA ATA CAA ACA CCC and R-5'-GCT CCC CAA AAG CAT AAA CA in the case of fragment 11.26. The cycling parameters used to amplify both fragments were: 35 cycles of 1 s at 94oC, 1 s at 55oC and 15 s at 72oC. The labeled PCR products were diluted five times with denaturing solution composed of: 95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 0.05% xylene cyanol. That mixture was heated at 85oC for 5 min. The denatured DNA samples were loaded on a 5% native polyacrylamide gel (49:1) containing 10% glycerol. Electrophoresis was performed at constant power of 0.5 W/cm until the bromophenol blue marker reached the bottom of the gel. The gel was dried and subjected to autoradiography at -80oC with an intensifying screen.


Figure 2 . Multiplex SSCP-HDX analysis of exons 6, 7, 14, 16, 18 and 22 amplified from pooled genomic DNA (four samples in the pool). PCR primers were adapted from Friedman et al . (2). The PCR and SSCP-HDX conditions used were the same as described in the legend to Figure 1. Exons amplified from the same DNA pool were combined, denatured, and 3 [mu]l of each mixture was loaded on the gel. The arrowhead indicates the 5465 G/A mutation in exon 22.

Next, we asked the question which fragments of the gene could be analysed together on the same gel in a multiplex version of SSCP. In order to demonstrate this clearly, we have run all 49 different fragments of BRCA1, including 26 fragments of exon 11, on a single native polyacrylamide gel. It turned out that SSCP analysis of BRCA1 can be done on 10-12 pools, each composed of four to five different gene fragments, despite the fact that BRCA1 primers were not specifically designed to facilitate the multiplex type of analysis. The example of multiplex SSCP-HDX analysis of six different BRCA1 exons is shown in Figure 2 .

Next, the approach outlined above was compared directly with the standard procedure in the real mutation screening. This trial involved genomic DNA from 96 individuals and 23 BRCA1 exons. The same genomic DNA samples were subjected to PCR, both separately and in pools of four. Then the DNA fragments amplified from pooled DNA were combined into groups of four before the SSCP-HDX analysis. Except for longer autoradiography of the gels with pooled DNA samples, other conditions of analysis were the same. It turned out that each of the nine variant bands that were detected by the conventional type of analysis were also detected in pooled DNA.

In this strategy the DNA pools in which mutations are detected are then split into components and individual samples are subjected again to analysis in order to identify the mutation carriers. To use the pooled DNA approach successfully in mutation screening, it is necessary to adjust the concentration of individual genomic DNA samples to approximately the same value before pooling. We achieve that by the serial dilutions of DNA samples, each dilution followed by the agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of DNA concentration standards. It is also recommended to check the quality of individual genomic DNA samples by PCR before pooling. This step is obligatory when DNA comes from different sources and was isolated following different protocols. It should also be stressed that the approach we propose is very cost effective. All DNA amplifications are conducted in a 5 [mu]l volume following the protocol for fast and economical PCR ( 9 ). When a pool of five genomic DNA samples is amplified in the 5 [mu]l volume it is like using 1 [mu]l PCR mix to amplify a gene fragment from a single genomic DNA.

Further reduction of time and effort required to detect mutations could be achieved by using fluorescently labeled primers and automatic DNA sequencing apparatus for SSCP-HDX analysis ( 10 ). The replacement of a single radioisotope with four different fluorescent dyes should enable a further increase of throughput of the analysis and enhance the sensitivity of detecting mutations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This work was supported by grant from State Committee for Scientific Research Nr 6 P207 106 06.

REFERENCES

1 Miki,Y., Swensen,J., Shattuck-Eidens,D., Futreal,P.A., Harshman,K., Tavtigian,S., Liu,Q., Cochran,C., Bennett,L.M., Ding,W. et al. (1994) Science, 266, 66-71.

2 Friedman,L.S., Ostermeyer,E.A., Szabo,C.I., Dowd,P., Lynch,E.D., Rowell,S.E. and King,M.-C. (1994) Nature Genet., 8, 399-404.

3 Castilla,L.H., Couch,F.J., Erdos,M.R., Hoskings,K.F., Calzone,K., Garber,J.E., Boyd,J., Lubin,M.B., Deshano,M.L., Brody,L.C., Collins,F.S. and Weber,B.L. (1994) Nature Genet., 8, 387-391.

4 Simard,J., Tonin,P., Durocher,F., Morgan,K., Rommens,J., Gingras,S., Samson,C., Leblanc,J.-F., Bélanger,C., Dion,F. et al. (1994) Nature Genet., 8, 392-398.

5 Futreal,P.A., Liu,Q., Shattuck-Eidens,D., Cochran,C., Harshman,K., Tavtigian,S., Bennett,L.M., Haugen-Strano,A., Swensen,J., Miki,Y. et al. (1994) Science, 266, 120-122.

6 Szabo,C.I. and King,M.-C. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 1811-1817.

7 Orita,M., Suzuki,Y., Sekiya,T. and Hayashi,K. (1989) Genomics, 5, 874-879.

8 Tinker,N.A., Mather,D.E. and Fortin,M.G. (1994) Genome, 37, 999-1004.

9 Sobczak,K., Kozlowski,P. and Krzyzosiak,W.J. (1995) Acta Biochim. Pol., 42, 363-366.

10 Makino,R., Yazyu,H., Kishimoyo,Y., Sekiya,T. and Hayashi,K. (1992) PCR Methods Appl. 2, 10-13.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Kozlowski and W. J. Krzyzosiak
Combined SSCP/duplex analysis by capillary electrophoresis for more efficient mutation detection
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): e71 - e71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. C. R. Chan, B. Y.L. Wong, H. Ozcelik, and D. E.C. Cole
Simple and Rapid Detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations by Multiplex Mutagenically Separated PCR
Clin. Chem., August 1, 1999; 45(8): 1285 - 1287.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (50K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrowScopus Links
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, P
Right arrow Articles by Kryzosiak, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozlowski, P
Right arrow Articles by Kryzosiak, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?