Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (157K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (62)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuveglise, C
Right arrow Articles by Paris, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neuveglise, C
Right arrow Articles by Paris, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1428-1435

Footnote

Afut 1, a retrotransposon-like element from Aspergillus fumigatus

Afut 1, a retrotransposon-like element from Aspergillus fumigatus Cécile Neuveglise , Jacqueline Sarfati , Jean-Paul Latge and Sophie Paris*

Laboratoire des Aspergillus, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-75724 Paris Cedex 15, France

Received January 26, 1996; Revised and Accepted February 28, 1996 GenBank accession nos L76085 and L76086

ABSTRACT

A repeated DNA sequence used for epidemiological studies of the human opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus has been characterized. It is a retroelement of 6914 bp in length, bounded by long terminal repeats of 282 bp, with sequence and features characteristic of retroviruses and retrotransposons. A 5 bp duplication site was found at its borders. This element, designated Afut 1, encodes amino acid sequences homologous to the reverse transcriptase, RNase H and endonuclease encoded by the pol genes of retroelements. Comparison of the peptidic sequences with other putative polypeptides of fungal LTR retrotransposons showed that Afut 1 is a member of the gypsy group. This is the first report of a transposable element in A.fumigatus . Afut 1 is a defective element: the putative coding domains contain multiple stop codons due exclusively to transitions from C:G to T:A.

INTRODUCTION

Aspergillus fumigatus is an opportunistic fungus causing several respiratory diseases, such as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, aspergilloma and invasive aspergillosis. The latter is presently a major cause of death amongst immunocompromised patients in hospitals, especially in transplant units. Understanding the infection steps in the hospital environment has required the development of molecular methods for fingerprinting A.fumigatus strains. Repeated sequences specific for A.fumigatus have been isolated that allow precise strain identification and that provide a measure of strain relatedness which has been very helpful in molecular epidemiological studies of invasive aspergillosis ( 1 - 3 ).

Southern blot hybridization with dispersed repeated DNA sequences has been used in molecular typing studies amongst human and plant fungal pathogens ( 4 - 9 ). The nature of these sequences is seldom identified. In the human pathogen Candida albicans most of the numerous repeated sequences (CARE1, CARE2, Ca3, Ca7, RPSs, 27a, Tca1, etc.) show no homology to any known nucleotide sequence ( 10 - 12 ), except for the Ca7 sequence, which is a 23 bp repeated sequence associated with telomeres ( 13 ), and for the Tca1 sequence, which is a retrotransposon-like element ( 14 ). In plant pathogenic fungi most of the dispersed repetitive sequences were characterized as transposable elements, in particular retrotransposons with long terminal repeats (LTRs) ( 6 , 7 , 15 ). Since the fungal LTR retroelements are merely found by analyzing repetitive sequences, their ability to transpose has rarely been proven. Maggy, which has been identified by transposon tagging, is the only LTR retrotransposon which has been shown to transpose ( 16 ). The Cf T-1 element of Cladosporium fulvum is supposed to be active, since this element is transcribed into an RNA which is packaged in virus-like particles that contain reverse transcriptase ( 7 ). In contrast, elements like Foret 1 ( 17 ) that possess an accumulation of stop codons in putative coding regions are clearly defective.

Since the nature of the repeated sequences of A.fumigatus was not known, we investigated the repetitive DNA sequence [lambda]3.9 ( 1 ) used as a probe for epidemiological studies of A.fumigatus ( 2 , 3 ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungal strains and culture media

The reference strain of A.fumigatus used in this study was originally isolated from a patient in 1971 and deposited at the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures in 1989 as CBS143-89. The strain was maintained on 2% malt agar. For DNA isolation CBS143-89 was grown overnight at 37oC in Sabouraud's medium [1% mycopeptone (Biocar, France), 2% glucose].

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Escherichia coli DH5[alpha] [ endA1 hsdR17 supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA relA1 [Delta]( lacZYA-argF ) U169 deoR ([Phi] 80dlac [Delta]( lacZ ) M15 )] and PAP105 [[Delta]( lac-pro ) F'( lacI q1 [Delta]( lacZ ) M15 pro + Tn 10 )] were used for propagation and amplification of recombinant plasmids as described by Sambrook et al . ( 18 ). Plasmid Bluescript ) SK(+) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used in subcloning procedures.

Isolation and manipulation of DNA

Aspergillus fumigatus DNA preparations and Southern blot hybridization were done as previously described ( 1 ). Plasmid DNA manipulations, cloning techniques and DNA sequencing were performed by standard procedures ( 18 ).

The [lambda]3.9 recombinant phage ( 1 ) was first digested with Eco RI. Four fragments of 1.0, 1.1, 1.7 and 5.0 kb showed strong intensity when probed with 32 P-labeled genomic DNA of the CBS143-89 strain. These fragments, containing portions of the repetitive sequence, were subcloned into pBluescript ) SK(+), yielding pJS2, pJS1, pJS24 and pCN13 respectively. The Hin dIII and Acc I fragments contained in the insert of pCN13 were subcloned into pBluescript ) SK(+), yielding pCN25H and pCN20A respectively. The repetitive sequence of [lambda]3.9 phage was sequenced on both strands using primers that hybridized with the vector sequence and using appropriately designed primers.


Figure 1 . Restriction map of the recombinant [lambda] phage [lambda]3.9 containing a repetitive DNA sequence specific to A.fumigatus . Single copy DNA sequences (empty boxes) and repetitive DNA (hatched box) of A.fumigatus are delimited by hybridization with 32 P-labeled genomic DNA. Boxes with black arrows indicate the LTRs. Subclones with Eco RI fragments (pJS1, pJS2, pJS24 and pCN13) and hybridization probes used in this study (pJS2, pJS24, pCN25H and pCN20A) are indicated below the map. Abbreviations for restriction enzymes are: A, Acc I; E, Eco RI; H, Hin dIII; S, Sal I. Acc I and Hin dIII restriction sites are indicated only in the repeated sequence.

The [lambda]4.11 recombinant phage ( 1 ) was digested with Bgl II and the two resulting fragments of 2.4 and 6.5 kb, containing the repetitive sequence, were subcloned into Bam HI-digested Bluescript ) SK(+). The 5' LTR of this copy of the element was sequenced on both strands, whereas the putative reverse transcriptase domain was sequenced entirely on the plus strand and partially on the minus strand.

DNA sequence analysis was performed using the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group programs ( 19 ).

DNA from pCN13 or pJS1 was subjected to PCR amplification with the Hi-Taqtm DNA polymerase (Bioprobe Systems, France) according to the supplier's specifications. The primers used were: LTR1 (5'-GGGGGTCCTAGCCAGCG-3'); LTR2 (5'-CTCAGAACAACATAAGC-3'), 58T33 (5'-GATTAGTTAGATTCCCCC-3'); 58T71 (5'-CAAATATAGGGATAGGC-3'); LNA1b2 (5'-TAACTAGTCTAATAATA-3'). Amplifications were performed for 30 cycles of 1 min at 94oC, 1 min at 45oC and 1 min at 72oC. The size of the fragments amplified with the LTR1/LTR2, 58T33/58T71 and LNA1b2/SK primer pairs were 245, 686 and 571 bp respectively.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The nucleotide sequences of the 3.9 copy of Afut 1 and of the 5' LTR of the 4.11 copy have been submitted to the GenBank database under accession nos L76086 and L76085 respectively.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Structure of repetitive DNA from A.fumigatus

The recombinant [lambda] phage 3.9 contained a repetitive DNA sequence, which was divided into four Eco RI restriction fragments subcloned into Bluescript ) SK(+) (Fig. 1 ), and that was bordered with single copy sequences (data not shown). Sequence data of the four subclones revealed: (i) two direct repeats of 282 bp in pJS1 and pCN13; (ii) between these two repeats a DNA sequence with significant homology to the pol genes of LTR retrotransposons; (iii) two short direct repeats of 5 bp (TCCTT) flanking the 3.9 repetitive sequence. These data suggested that the 3.9 repetitive sequence is a retransposon with long terminal repeats (LTRs). This element was therefore called Afut 1 ( A.fu migatus t ransposon).

The two 282 bp direct repeats corresponding to the LTRs, as well as the two 5 bp direct repeats characteristic of a target site duplication generated during transposition, delimited the extremities of the repeated sequence. Nucleotide analysis of the element revealed that it had a total length of 6914 bp and was A+T-rich (63%), while structural genes of A.fumigatus show ~47% A+T.

The 5' and 3' LTRs are not perfect direct repeats, since they share only 90% nt identity. There are 27 nt differences between the two LTRs, corresponding exclusively to C:G -> T:A transitions (Fig. 2 ). The 5' and 3' LTRs contain the 5'-terminal TG and the 3'-terminal CA respectively (see boxed nucleotides in Fig. 2 ) that are characteristics of retroviruses and of most retrotransposons. However, the other end of each LTR does not possess this property, because of a C:G -> T:A base pair transition (Fig. 2 ). Short direct repeats were identified in the LTR sequence. None of them corresponds to sequences previously described in the LTR of other retrotransposons.


Figure 2 . Alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the 5' and 3' LTRs from the 3.9 copy of the Afut 1 element. The LTR sequences (282 bp) are capitalized. The 2 bp terminal inverted repeats are boxed. The 5 bp target site duplication is in lower case. Vertical bars indicate identical nucleotides in the two sequences. The nucleotides of short direct repeats (DR1, DR2 and DR3) are in bold type and underlined or overlined by arrows. The nucleotides of the LTR1 and LTR2 primers used for PCR amplification are underlined.

Most of the sequence characteristics of retroviruses and of many retrotransposons related to their mechanism of transposition, such as the tRNA primer binding sites for minus strand DNA synthesis and transcriptional regulatory sequences (CAT, TATA box, CT box, polyadenylation sequences, etc.), were not found in Afut 1. In contrast, a polypurine-rich sequence that corresponds to the primer binding site for plus strand DNA synthesis is present immediately upstream of the 3' LTR (data not shown). Its sequence is 5'-GAAGGGGGGGGATAG-3'.


Figure 3 . Amino acid alignment of putative RT, RNase H and endonuclease domains from Afut 1 and other fungal LTR retrotransposons: Boty from Botrytis cinerea (15); Skippy (40) and Foret 1 (16) from Fusarium oxysporum ; Cf T-1 from Cladosporium fulvum (7); Maggy (41) and grh (6) from Magnaporthe grisea . Stars in the sequence indicate a stop codon. Amino acids common to all fungal LTR retrotransposons are indicated below the sequence with an asterisk. The sign @ indicates amino acids common to all sequences except Afut 1 or Foret 1, which have a stop codon. The sign c indicates the conserved amino acids of the zinc binding site.

Computer analysis of the Afut 1 sequence did not identify any large open reading frame, due to the presence of numerous stop codons in each of the six translated frames. Nevertheless, a comparison of the predicted Afut 1 protein sequence deduced from each frame using the Swissprot database showed that one of these six frames has significant homology with the polyprotein encoded by pol genes from gypsy and copia retrotransposons of Drosophila . The domains of reverse transcriptase (RT), RNase H and endonuclease were identified in Afut 1. Moreover, database searching revealed 56% nt identity of the ans1 sequence of A.nidulans ( 20 ) with the regions corresponding to the reverse transcriptase and RNase H domains of Afut 1. When the ans1 sequence was translated one of the six frames showed significant homology with the putative Afut 1 reverse transcriptase (41.5% amino acid identity to 3.9 copy and 42% amino acid identity to 4.11 copy of Afut 1). Britten et al . ( 21 ) suggested that this A.nidulans segment was related to the gypsy element. The similarity of ans1 to the Afut 1 reverse transcriptase and RNase H domains confirms that it corresponds to a relic of a LTR retrotransposon, probably defective because of the accumulation of stop codons.


Figure 4 . Alignment of nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the two studied copies of the Afut 1 retrotransposon (3.9 and 4.11). ( A ) Alignment of the 5' LTR nucleotide sequences (in upper case). Nucleotides of the 5 bp target site duplication are in lower case. Vertical bars indicate identical nucleotides in the two sequences. ( B ) Alignment of nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the putative RTs. Stars in the amino acid sequence indicate a stop codon.

The Afut 1 amino acid sequence was then compared with the corresponding sequences from the six fungal LTR retrotransposons already published or available in the GenBank database: Foret 1 ( 17 ) and Skippy (N. Anaya and M. I. G. Roncero, unpublished; L34658) from Fusarium oxysporum ; Cf T-1 from Cladosporium fulvum ( 7 ); Boty from Botrytis cinerea ( 15 ); grh ( 6 ) and Maggy (M. L. Farman, Y. Tosa, N. Nitta and S. A. Leong, unpublished; L35053) from Magnaporthe grisea (Fig. 3 ). A 184 amino acid region of the putative Afut 1 polyprotein was similar to the retroviral reverse transcriptases (RT), which contain seven typical domains ( 22 ). The highly conserved YXDD sequence, supposed to be part of the RT active site ( 23 ), was detected in all fungal LTR retrotransposons mentioned here, but not in Afut 1. In this element a C:G -> T:A transition generates the conversion of the second Asp residue into an Asn residue (YLDN). Surprisingly, the usually conserved YXDD box is also different in ans1 , but is identical to the homologous region of Afut 1 (YLDNILI). The residues IL immediately downstream of the YXDD box are conserved in the eight fungal sequences, including Afut 1 and ans1 . The overall identity between the Afut 1 putative RT and the corresponding domains of the six other fungal elements varies from 38.5% with grh ( 6 ) to 45.5% with Maggy (M. L. Farman, Y. Tosa, N. Nitta and S. A. Leong, unpublished), two LTR retrotransposons from Magnaporthe grisea . Downstream of the putative RT is a 238 amino acid region containing the homologous RNase H domain of the fungal LTR retrotransposons, which shares 25% ( Foret 1)-38% (Maggy and Boty) identity with the corresponding Afut 1 domain (Fig. 3 ). Moreover, Afut 1 RNase H contains amino acids residues that are essentially invariant in the RNase H sequences of the other fungal elements. For example, the FLG and RXFI sequences separated by five residues are conserved in all fungal LTR retrotransposons. The alignment of the 236 amino acid sequence containing the putative endonuclease domain of the different fungal retrotransposons indicates that this region shows only 24% ( grh )-33% ( Cf T-1) identity with the homologous domain of the Afut 1 element (Fig. 3 ). The amino acid structure characteristic of a zinc binding site ( 24 ) consisting of two closely spaced histidines separated by 29 amino acid residues from a brace of closely spaced cysteines is present in the putative endonuclease domain of all the LTR retrotransposons of fungal species, except in Afut 1. In the latter one His and the two Cys residues are replaced by Tyr residues. These amino acid changes can be explained by a single nucleotide transition from C:G to T:A. Numerous amino acids are conserved in the RT, RNase H or endonuclease domains of all fungal retrotransposons except in Afut 1 and Foret 1. However, when a difference is observed, it often results from a transition from C:G to T:A yielding a stop codon or another amino acid residue.


Figure 5 . Southern blot of genomic DNA from A.fumigatus strain CBS143-89 digested with Eco RI (lanes 1 and 2), Hin dIII (lane 3) or Acc I (lane 4). Hybridization was with plasmids pJS2 (lane 1), pJS24 (lane 2), pCN25H (lane 3) and pCN20A (lane 4) as probes. The predicted hybridization bands are indicated on the left, with an arrow and the lane number of the corresponding pattern.

All the six fungal LTR retrotransposons compared with Afut 1 possess a sequence and an organization that are characteristic of the gypsy group of Drosophila : the various domains of their pol gene show a protease-reverse transcriptase-RNase H-endonuclease arrangement, whereas copia-like elements show a protease-endonuclease-reverse transcriptase-RNase H arrangement ( 25 ). The order of amino acid domains of Afut 1 and their sequence identity with homologous putative polyproteins of other fungal LTR retrotransposons strongly suggests that Afut 1 is a member of the gypsy group. According to amino acid identity, Afut 1 is most closely related to the Maggy element.

[lambda] 4.11, another copy of Afut 1

The [lambda]4.11 recombinant phage was isolated from the same library as the [lambda]3.9 phage and cross-hybridized with it. The repeated region of the [lambda]4.11 phage was cut into two Bgl II fragments which were subsequently subcloned. The restriction maps of these two subclones revealed that the three Eco RI sites and most of the Hin dIII sites previously identified in the 3.9 copy are conserved, whereas the Acc I sites are absent. This implies that the repeated sequence of the two phage corresponds to two different copies.

The 5' LTR of the 4.11 copy was sequenced and compared with the 5' LTR of the 3.9 sequence (Fig. 4 A). They are only 86.5% identical. All nucleotide mutations correspond to C:G -> T:A transitions. The insertion site of the 4.11 copy is ATAAT, which is distinct from the 3.9 insertion site (TCCTT). Moreover, the sequences flanking the elements do not show any homology. This confirms that 3.9 and 4.11 are two distinct copies.


Figure 6 . Southern blot of genomic DNA from strain CBS143-89 digested with Bam HI (lane 1), Cla I (lane 2), Eco RV (lane 3), Pvu II (lane 4), Sal I (lane 5) and Xho I (lane 6). ( A ) Hybridization with the amplified product obtained with the LTR1 and LTR2 primers located in the Afut 1 LTR (Fig. 2). ( B ) Hybridization with the two Afut 1 fragments flanking the LTRs resulting from the amplification with the LNA1b2/SK or 58T33/58T71 primer pairs. Some of the additional bands obtained with the LTR probe (A) are indicated with arrows and the lane number of the corresponding pattern.

The DNA region containing the putative RT was sequenced in the 4.11 copy. The nucleotide sequence and the amino acid sequence were aligned with the corresponding sequences of the 3.9 copy (Fig. 4 B). The two nucleotide sequences share 92% identity. As in the comparison of both 5' LTRs, the nucleotide variations of both RTs correspond to transitions from C:G to T:A. The RT amino acid sequence of the 4.11 copy shows 87% identity to the homologous region of the 3.9 copy. Most of the nucleotide transitions generate amino acids changes, mainly due to stop codons; there are five additional stop codons in the 4.11 RT region.

Distribution, conservation and copy number of Afut 1 elements

To determine the copy number of the Afut 1 elements per genome the DNA of strain CBS143-89 was digested with enzymes that do not cut the 3.9 copy of Afut 1 ( Bam HI, Cla I, Eco RV, Pvu II, Sal I and Xho I), transferred to nylon membrane and probed with internal subclones of Afut 1 (pCN20A and pJS2). The hybridization patterns of the Eco RV and Pvu II digests show bands whose sizes are smaller than 7 kb, confirming that the restriction sites of the different copies of Afut 1 are not conserved. In the other digests ( Bam HI, Cla I, Sal I and Xho I) the number of hybridizing bands (>7 kb) is at least 10, but with variable intensity (data not shown).

Table 1 CpG dinucleotides in genes or sequences of A.fumigatus
Gene or sequence

Size (bp)

CpG

Gene accession no.*

O

E

O/E

Afut 1

6924

39

236

0.165

L76086

PEP

1540

71

104

0.683

X85092

RES

834

44

56

0.785

X58278

RAS

2590

126

146

0.863

L42299

HSP

360

17

28

0.607

S60074

RODA

1202

54

76

0.710

L25258

ALP

2163

112

147

0.762

Z11580

MEP

3068

193

222

0.869

Z30424

O, observed number of CpG in the sequence; E, expected number of CpG in the sequence = (number of C residues in the sequence) * (number of G residues in the sequence) [divide] (total bases in the sequence), according to Kricker et al . (38). *GenBank.

It is not yet certain whether this difference in intensity reflects a nucleotide divergence (the 3.9 and 4.11 copies share only 92% identity in the RT and 86.5% in the 5' LTR) or reveals a variable number of copies. Transposable elements such as Pogo from Neurospora crassa ( 26 ) and Ty1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( 27 ) showed a similar heterogeneity. Since the restriction sites of Afut 1 are poorly conserved and prevent an accurate count of the number of full-length copies, an approximate number of at least 10 copies can be proposed. This number is consistent with the moderate copy number (25 copies) of Cf T-1 from C.fulvum ( 7 ).

Conservation of Afut 1 copies was more precisely studied by analyzing their restriction site polymorphism within the CBS143-89 genome. There are three Eco RI, four Hin dIII and four Acc I restriction sites in the 3.9 copy of Afut 1 (Fig. 1 ). Eco RI-, Hind III- or Acc I-digested genomic DNA was subjected to Southern analysis by probing with pJS2 (1 kb) and pJS24 (1.7 kb), pCN25H (1.3 kb) or pCN20A (1.4 kb) respectively (Fig. 5 ). The patterns revealed a ladder of bands of heterogeneous intensity, in addition to the expected one. This confirms again that the positions of the restriction sites mapped within the sequenced element are poorly conserved in the other genomic copies of Afut 1.

The presence of Afut 1 LTR as solo elements was investigated in strain CBS143-89 by digesting genomic DNA with different enzymes that do not cut the 3.9 copy of Afut 1 ( Bam HI, Cla I, Eco RV, Pvu II, Sal I and Xho I) and by probing the Southern blot with two different fragments of Afut 1: first, an amplified fragment of the 5' and 3' LTRs (Fig. 6 A) and, second, amplification products of the two internal regions of Afut 1 close to the LTRs (Fig. 6 B). These two fragments, located 52 bp downstream of the 5' LTR and 218 bp upstream of the 3' LTR, are respectively 571 and 686 bp long. They were chosen in order to minimize the occurrence of hybridizing fragments that do not correspond to true solo LTRs. Comparison of the hybridization patterns revealed the presence of additional bands when digested genomic DNA was hybridized with the LTR fragment. This strongly suggests that there are several solo LTRs in the genome, but cloning and sequencing of the fragments corresponding to the additional bands should be done to confirm the presence or absence of solo elements. LTRs as solo elements have not previously been identified in filamentous fungi. However, in other eukaryotic genomes LTRs are often found as solo elements separated from the transposon. In the dimorphic fungus Yarrowia lipolytica Schmid-Berger et al . ( 28 ) reported the existence of >30 copies of the solo [xi] element (the LTR of the composite element Ylt1). In S.cerevisiae LTRs of the Ty retrotransposons are often found as solo elements: [delta] elements for Ty1 ( 27 , 29 ), [sigma] elements for Ty3 ( 30 ) and Ty5 LTR ( 31 ). In the maize species Zea mays Cin1 sequences are only known as solo LTR elements ( 32 ). According to Roeder and Fink ( 33 ), the solo LTRs arose by homologous recombination between the LTRs of the retroelement followed by excision of the internal region. Chen and Fonzi ( 14 ) explained the existence of solo LTRs in the Tca1 element of C.albicans by this type of recombinational event.

Afut 1 is a defective retrotransposon

Several arguments show that Afut 1 is a defective transposable element. First, the amino acids sequence homologous to the polyprotein of retroviruses is interrupted by many stop codons in both the 3.9 and 4.11 copies. Moreover, the overall conserved amino acid boxes, such as YXDD in the RT domain, are mutated in the two Afut 1 copies, whereas this box has been proposed to be part of the RT active site ( 23 ). The two LTRs of the 3.9 copy share only 90% identity. Accumulation of stop codons in putative coding regions and divergence between the LTRs of the same copy have already been described. In the fungal retroelement Foret 1 the amino acid sequence corresponding to the protease, RT and RNase H domains is interrupted by many stop codons. Similarly, del , the Lilium henryi retrotransposon ( 34 ) and Ty5 from S.cerevisiae ( 31 ) contain several stop codons.

In the Pogo element of N.crassa the two copies of the LTR-like sequences, which are 89% identical, differ by 34 nt, including 33 transitions from C:G to T:A ( 35 ). In the 3.9 copy of Afut 1 the 27 nt substitutions correspond exclusively to transitions. Similarly, nucleotide differences between the RT of the 3.9 and 4.11 copies are transitions from C:G to T:A. Such a pattern of nucleotide variations would be consistent with a process described for Neurospora repeated sequences ( 36 ). This process, referred to as RIP (repeat-induced point mutation) produces numerous C:G -> T:A mutations in both copies of duplicated sequences during the period between fertilization and karyogamy. In Neurospora changes occurred primarily at sites where there was an adenine 3' of the changed cytosine ( 37 ). In order to determine if mutations occurred randomly the frequencies of dinucleotides in Afut 1 were analyzed. The Afut 1 sequence contains no CpA depletions, but the frequency of CpG dinucleotides was unusually low ( <= 0.165) when compared with the frequencies observed in A.fumigatus structural genes, which have a mean value of 0.68 (Table 1 ). In other words, the substantial deficit of CpG clearly suggest that mutations occurred preferentially in CpG dinucleotides, as in mammalian genomes ( 38 ). As cytosine methylation is typically associated with mutations in sequences affected by RIP ( 39 ), it was of interest to determine whether the Afut 1 copies were subjected to methylation. The genomic DNA of strain CBS143-89 was digested with isoschizomers of restriction endonucleases which exhibit differential sensitivity to cytosine methylation: Sau 3AI and Nde II or Msp I and Hpa II. In contrast to Sau 3A, Nde II is blocked by methylation. When the external C in the sequence CCGG is methylated neither Msp I nor Hpa II can cleave. However, unlike Hpa II, Msp I can cleave the sequence when the internal C residue is methylated. The restriction patterns obtained after ethidium bromide staining of the digested genomic DNA appeared identical with both couples of isoschizomers. Moreover, the Southern blot probed with the [lambda]3.9 phage revealed identical patterns with the isoschizomers, which implies the absence of methylated cytosine in Afut 1 copies.

Two hypotheses are proposed to explain this accumulation of mutations. First, the mechanism of CpG site mutation in Afut 1 copies is a new phenomenon that does not accurately correspond to the RIP process described in N.crassa since: (i) A.fumigatus sexual reproduction is unknown; (ii) no methylation was detected in Afut 1 copies by DNA digestion analysis. The more attractive hypothesis is that the strains studied are presently defective for RIP, but that Afut 1 has been subjected to RIP at a time when A.fumigatus possessed a functional sexual cycle and an active DNA methylation process. Thus the 3.9 and 4.11 copies could be relics of RIP.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr G. Faugeron for helpful discussions about the RIP mechanism, suggestions and stimulating encouragement.We are grateful to Drs M. J. Daboussi and T. Langin for useful comments about fungal transposable elements. We are also thankful to Dr C. d'Enfert for critical reading of the manuscript. This research was supported by CNAMTS-INSERM grant 3AM051 to J.P.L. and a post-doctoral fellowship from the Association Française de Lutte contre la Mucoviscidose (AFLM) to C.N.

REFERENCES

1 Girardin,H., Latgé,J.P., Srikantha,T., Morrow,B. and Soll,D.R. (1993) J. Clin. Microbiol., 31, 1547-1554. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Girardin,H., Sarfati,J., Kobayashi,H., Bouchara,J.P. and Latgé,J.P. (1994) J. Infect. Dis., 169, 683-685. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Girardin,H., Sarfati,J., Traoré,F., Dupouy-Camet,J., Derouin,F. and Latgé,J.P. (1994) J. Clin. Microbiol., 32, 684-690. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Scherer,S. and Stevens,D.A. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1452-1456. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Goodwin,S.B., Drenth,A. and Fry,W.E. (1992) Curr. Genet., 22, 107-115. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Dobinson,K.F., Harris,R.E. and Hamer,J.E. (1993) Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 6, 114-126.

7 McHale,M.T., Roberts,I.N., Noble,S.M., Beaumont,C., Whitehead,M.P., Seth,D. and Oliver,R.P. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet., 233, 337-347. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Schmid,J., Tay,Y.P., Wan,L., Carr,M., Parr,D. and McKinney,W. (1995) J. Clin. Microbiol., 33, 1223-1230. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Girardin,H., Monod,M. and Latgé,J.P. (1995) Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 1378-1383. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Lasker,B.A., Page,L.S., Lott,T.J., Kobayashi,G.S. and Medoff,G. (1991) Gene, 102, 45-50. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Lasker,B.A., Page,L.S., Lott,T.J. and Kobayashi,G.S. (1992) Gene, 116, 51-57. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Anderson,J., Srikantha,T., Morrow,B., Miyasaki,S.H., White,T.C., Agabian,N., Schmid,J. and Soll,D.R. (1993) J. Clin. Microbiol., 31, 1472-1480. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Sadhu,C., McEachern,M.J., Rustchenko-Bulgac,E.P., Schmid,J., Soll,D.R. and Hicks,J.B. (1991) J. Bacteriol., 173, 842-850. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Chen,J.Y. and Fonzi,W.A. (1992) J. Bacteriol., 174, 5624-5632. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Diolez,A., Marches,F., Fortini,D. and Brygoo,Y. (1995) Appl. Envriron. Microbiol., 61, 103-108.

16 Lebrun,M.H, Chumley,F., Valent,B. (1994) In Zeigler,R.S., Leong,S.A. and Teng,P.S. (eds) Rice Blast Fungus. CAB, Wallingford, UK, p. 593.

17 Julien,J., Poirier-Hamon,S. and Brygoo,Y. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 3933-3937. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

19 Devereux,J., Haerberli,P. and Smithies,O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res., 12, 387-395. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Cullen,D., Wilson,L.J., Grey,G.L., Henner,D.J., Turner,G. and Ballance,D.J. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 9163-9175. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Britten,R.J., McCormack,T.J., Mears,T.L. and Davidson,E.H. (1995) J. Mol. Evol., 40, 13-24. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Xiong,Y. and Eickbush,T.H. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 3353-3362. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Varmus,H. and Brown,P. (1989) In Berg,D.E. and Howe,M. (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp. 53-108.

24 Johnson,M.S., McClure,M.A., Feng,D.F., Gray,J. and Doolittle,R.F. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 7648-7652. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Springer,M.S. and Britten,R.J. (1993) Mol. Biol. Evol., 10, 1370-1379. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Schechtman,M.G. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 3168-3177. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Cameron,J.R., Loh,E.Y. and Davis,R.W. (1979) Cell, 16, 739-751. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Schmid-Berger,N., Schmid,B. and Barth,G. (1994) J. Bacteriol., 176, 2477-2482.

29 Downs,K.M., Brennan,G. and Liebman,S.W. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 3451-3457. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Hansen,L.J., Chalker,D.L. and Sandmeyer,S.B. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol., 8, 5245-5256. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Voytas,D.F. and Boeke,J.D. (1992) Nature, 358, 717. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Grandbastien,M.A. (1992) Trends Genet., 8, 103-108. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Roeder,G.S. and Fink,G.R. (1980) Cell, 21, 239-249. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Smyth,D.R., Kalitsis,P., Joseph,J.L. and Sentry,J.W. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 5015-5019. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Schechtman,M.G. (1990) Gene, 88, 159-165. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Selker,E.U. and Stevens,J.N. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 8114-8118. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Cambareri,E.B., Jensen,B.C., Schabtach,E. and Selker,E.U. (1989) Science, 244, 1571-1575. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Kricker,M.C., Drake,J.W. and Radman,M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89,1075-1079. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Singer,M.J., Marcotte,B.A. and Selker,E.U. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 5586-5597. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Anaye,N. and Roncero,MiG., GenBank accession no. L34658, unpublished.

41 FarmonM.L., Toda,Y., Nitta,N. and Leong,S.A., GenBank accession no. L35053, unpublished.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
T. J. Sharpton, J. E. Stajich, S. D. Rounsley, M. J. Gardner, J. R. Wortman, V. S. Jordar, R. Maiti, C. D. Kodira, D. E. Neafsey, Q. Zeng, et al.
Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives
Genome Res., October 1, 2009; 19(10): 1722 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
S. A. Balajee, S. T. Tay, B. A. Lasker, S. F. Hurst, and A. P. Rooney
Characterization of a Novel Gene for Strain Typing Reveals Substructuring of Aspergillus fumigatus across North America
Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2007; 6(8): 1392 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
H. A. de Valk, J. F. G. M. Meis, I. M. Curfs, K. Muehlethaler, J. W. Mouton, and C. H. W. Klaassen
Use of a Novel Panel of Nine Short Tandem Repeats for Exact and High-Resolution Fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2005; 43(8): 4112 - 4120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. E. Hood, M. Katawczik, and T. Giraud
Repeat-Induced Point Mutation and the Population Structure of Transposable Elements in Microbotryum violaceum
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1081 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
C.E. McAlpin, B.W. Horn, and D.T. Wicklow
DNA fingerprinting analysis of vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus caelatus
Mycologia, January 1, 2005; 97(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Jin, Y.-K. Lee, and B. L. Wickes
Simple Chemical Extraction Method for DNA Isolation from Aspergillus fumigatus and Other Aspergillus Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 42(9): 4293 - 4296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. Lair-Fulleringer, J. Guillot, C. Desterke, D. Seguin, S. Warin, A. Bezille, R. Chermette, and S. Bretagne
Differentiation between Isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus from Breeding Turkeys and Their Environment by Genotyping with Microsatellite Markers
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2003; 41(4): 1798 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M.-J. Daboussi, J.-M. Daviere, S. Graziani, and T. Langin
Evolution of the Fot1 Transposons in the Genus Fusarium: Discontinuous Distribution and Epigenetic Inactivation
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 510 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Hua-Van, T. Langin, and M.-J. Daboussi
Evolutionary History of the impala Transposon in Fusarium oxysporum
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2001; 18(10): 1959 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Bart-Delabesse, J. Sarfati, J.-P. Debeaupuis, W. van Leeuwen, A. van Belkum, S. Bretagne, and J.-P. Latge
Comparison of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism, Microsatellite Length Polymorphism, and Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA Analyses for Fingerprinting Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2001; 39(7): 2683 - 2686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. Bertout, F. Renaud, R. Barton, F. Symoens, J. Burnod, M.-A. Piens, B. Lebeau, M.-A. Viviani, F. Chapuis, J.-M. Bastide, et al.
Genetic Polymorphism of Aspergillus fumigatus in Clinical Samples from Patients with Invasive Aspergillosis: Investigation Using Multiple Typing Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2001; 39(5): 1731 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. J. James, B. A. Lasker, M. M. McNeil, M. Shelton, D. W. Warnock, and E. Reiss
Use of a Repetitive DNA Probe To Type Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Aspergillus flavus from a Cluster of Cutaneous Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2000; 38(10): 3612 - 3618.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. Kashimoto, J. Katahira, W. R. Cornejo, M. Masuda, A. Fukuoh, T. Matsuzawa, T. Ohnishi, and Y. Horiguchi
Identification of Functional Domains of Bordetella Dermonecrotizing Toxin
Infect. Immun., August 1, 1999; 67(8): 3727 - 3732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
J.-P. Latge
Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 1999; 12(2): 310 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Bart-Delabesse, J.-F. Humbert, E. Delabesse, and S. Bretagne
Microsatellite Markers for Typing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 1998; 36(9): 2413 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
V. Chazalet, J.-P. Debeaupuis, J. Sarfati, J. Lortholary, P. Ribaud, P. Shah, M. Cornet, H. V. Thien, E. Gluckman, G. Brücker, et al.
Molecular Typing of Environmental and Patient Isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus from Various Hospital Settings
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 1998; 36(6): 1494 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (157K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (62)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuveglise, C
Right arrow Articles by Paris, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neuveglise, C
Right arrow Articles by Paris, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?