Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (105K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vold, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vold, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1497-1503

Footnote

The catalytic core of RNase P

The catalytic core of RNase P Christopher J. Green* , Rafael Rivera-León and Barbara S. Vold 1

SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park , CA 94025-3493, USA and 1 SYVA Company, 900 Arastradero Road, PO Box 10058, Palo Alto , CA 94303, USA

Received December 27, 1995; Revised and Accepted March 5, 1996

ABSTRACT

A deletion mutant of the catalytic RNA component of Escherichia coli RNase P missing residues 87-241 retains the ability to interact with the protein component to form a functional catalyst. The deletion of this phylogenetically conserved region significantly increases the K m, indicating that the deleted structures may be important for binding to the precursor tRNA substrate but not for the cleavage reaction. Under some reaction conditions, this RNase P deletion mutant can become a relatively non-specific nuclease, indicating that this RNA's catalytic center may be more exposed. The catalytic core of the RNase P is formed by less than one third of the 377 residues of the RNase P RNA.

INTRODUCTION

RNase P is a ribonucleoprotein responsible for cleaving the 5'-leader sequence from precursors of tRNA and 4.5 S RNA. In bacteria, this enzyme consists of an RNA subunit of ~400 bases and a protein subunit of ~120 amino acids. The RNA subunit has been shown to be capable of catalyzing the cleavage of the substrate by itself under appropriate buffer conditions and was the first true ribozyme to be discovered ( 1 ). The K m for the RNase P RNA-catalyzed cleavage of tRNA precursors has been shown to be the same as that for the RNase P holoenzyme, indicating that the RNA subunit supplies the binding surface for this type of substrate. The protein subunit has been demonstrated to reduce the ionic strength required for optimal activity and to increase the turnover of the reaction by speeding release of the cleaved product ( 2 ). Phylogenetic analyses have been used to develop the secondary structure model for RNase P RNA shown in Figure 1 ( 3 , 4 ).


Figure 1 . Secondary structure of the normal and the [Delta]87-241 mutant of E.coli RNase P RNA, presented using the helix nomenclature of Harris et al. (4). The residues noted in lower case were changed or added to accommodate the T7 RNA polymerase promoter and the Kpn I restriction site used to linearize the cloned template. The numbering system for both molecules is that of natural RNase P RNA. (These figures were modified from figures provided by James W. Brown and the Ribonuclease P Sequence Database.)

Considerable work has been done on the construction of deletion mutants of the RNA component of Escherichia coli RNase P. A 263-residue hybrid molecule combining the structural elements conserved in both E.coli and Bacillus megaterium RNase P RNAs has been constructed that has significant catalytic activity but does not respond to the protein component ( 5 ). The phylogenetically variable regions of RNase P RNA forming helices P3, P12, P13-14, P16-17 and P18 can be deleted separately without a complete loss of the ribozyme's catalytic activity ( 4 , 6 , 7 ). Some of these deletions have no significant effect on the RNase P RNA's kinetic constants if the reactions are performed under the appropriate buffer conditions ( 7 ). However, making major changes in phylogenetically conserved structures to create a significantly smaller but still active RNA catalyst capable of cleaving tRNA precursors has not, until now, been accomplished. Altman's group has shown that residues 1-54, 60-92, 230-260, 94-204 or 290-360 cannot be removed without the RNase P RNA losing its ability to cleave tRNA precursors ( 8 - 12 ). However, the 94-204 deletion of the catalytic RNA will still combine with the protein to cleave 4.5S RNA precursors ( 10 ).

Recently, two distinctly different 3-D models for E.coli RNase P RNA have been proposed ( 4 , 13 ). These two models do share one feature, however; they both predict that the T[Psi]C stem-loop of the tRNA precursor substrate is positioned near the RNase P RNA residues that form the P8 and P9 helices (Fig. 1 ). This predicted contact point is likely to be important for substrate binding, since a tRNA precursor `minihelix' consisting only of an aminoacyl acceptor stem fused to a T[Psi]C stem-and-loop structure has been shown to be a good substrate for RNase P RNA, with essentially the same K m as normal tRNA precursor substrates ( 14 ). The predicted location of the P8 and P9 helices at this end of the substrate also makes it unlikely that they are directly involved in the cleavage reaction.

The most direct way to test the role of the RNase P RNA regions believed to be involved in substrate recognition is by deletion analysis. We chose to remove the entire region between residues 87 and 241 of the RNase P RNA molecule ([Delta]87-241 P RNA) (Fig. 1 ). This deletion reduces the size of the RNA by 41% but avoids disrupting other secondary structures in the molecule. Helices P7 through P14 are missing in this construct. Structures homologous to those found in this deleted region are found in all known bacterial RNase P RNA sequences ( 7 ), and similar structures are even found in archaeal RNase P RNAs ( 15 , 16 ). This deletion mutant would be predicted to have a much lower affinity for the substrate, on the basis of the loss of the expected T[Psi]C stem-and-loop contact point. However, it should still have at least one other important substrate contact point involving the area around RNase P RNA residues 292 and 293 and the CCA sequence at the 3'-end of the substrate ( 4 , 17 - 19 ). Since nuclease protection experiments have indicated that some of the regions included in this deletion may be involved in the binding of the RNase P protein component ( 9 ), this deletion mutant could also be expected to have a reduced affinity for the protein.

In addition to removing specific structural elements, deleting significant portions of the RNase P RNA sequence could have subtle effects on the overall 3-D structure of the molecule. This may cause a misalignment of critical residues in the RNA and thus prevent it from binding to or cleaving the substrate. Since the RNase P protein component evolved to bind to a normal, functioning, RNA catalyst, the P protein may induce the correct conformation when it binds to the P RNA deletion mutant. Therefore it is important that the cleavage activity of any RNase P RNA deletion mutant also be tested in the presence of the RNase P protein.

When testing the activity of RNase P RNA deletion mutants in the presence of RNase P protein, it is extremely important to remove any trace of contaminating RNAs. During the preparation of RNase P protein from E.coli under non-denaturing conditions, RNase P RNA can bind to the P protein and co-purify with it, the result being a small amount of RNase P activity in the protein preparation. Using the pQE-30 (Qiagen) vector, we have recently produced a recombinant E.coli RNase P protein component ( 20 ), that allows for expression of the protein with a 12-amino-acid leader at the amino terminus containing six histidine residues. This leader sequence binds very strongly to a Ni-agarose column even under denaturing conditions and can be eluted with either low pH buffers or with imidazole. This `His-tagged' P protein is maximally active at a 1:1 ratio with normal E.coli RNase P RNA ( 20 ). The presence of the Ni-binding leader sequence is very useful in purifying the protein under denaturing conditions to remove the RNase P RNA of the E.coli host.

The substrate used for this work was the B.subtilis histidine tRNA precursor ( 21 ). The tRNA gene was cloned into a pSP64 plasmid and the tRNA precursor was made by transcription with SP6 RNA polymerase from an Eco RI linearized template. The transcript was labeled by the use of [[alpha]- 32 P]CTP during transcription. This pre-tRNA is unusual in that RNase P cleaves it to leave an 8 base pair (bp) aminoacyl stem rather than the 7 bp stem found in almost all other tRNAs ( 21 - 23 ). Small changes in the histidine pre-tRNA sequence have been shown to alter the processing site so that a 7 bp aminoacyl stem can be formed ( 22 ). Because this substrate seems to be on the verge of being cleaved at the wrong position by normal RNase P, we felt that use of this substrate would allow us to test for slight changes in the cleavage specificity of RNase P RNA deletion mutants. As will be shown below, this assumption turned out to be correct.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of RNA templates

The DNA templates for the RNase P RNA transcription were constructed by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The control normal RNase P RNA was amplified by PCR from E.coli genomic DNA using primers with the following sequences: CTCAAGCTTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGCTGACC and GGGAACTGACCGATAAGCCGGG. These two primers match the 5'- and 3'-ends of the RNase P RNA gene, respectively. The first primer includes the 17-base-long T7 RNA polymerase promoter and a Hin dIII restriction site at the 5'-end. The PCR-amplified DNA was cleaved with Hin dIII and then cloned into pUC18 cut with Hin dIII and Sma I (a blunt end restriction enzyme). This and all of the other PCR-generated constructs were then sequenced from both strands to make sure that there were no PCR errors. To make a T7 polymerase template, this plasmid was cleaved with Kpn I. Transcription from this template produces an essentially normal E.coli RNase P RNA as shown in Figure 1 . The only differences from the natural sequence are found at the extreme 5'- and 3'-ends that were changed to accommodate the T7 polymerase transcription start and the Kpn I site.

The transcription templates for deletion mutants RNase P RNA were also constructed by the use of PCR of the original normal RNase P template. A template that produced a deletion of the first 11 and the last 34 residues of RNase P RNA ([Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA) was made by PCR using primers with the sequence CTCAAGCTTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGACAGTCGCCGCTTCGTC and GGGACAGTCATTCATCTAGGC. The first of these primers included the 17-base-long T7 RNA polymerase promoter and a Hin dIII restriction site at the 5'-end for cloning as described above.

The template for the [Delta]87-241 P RNA was generated by three separate PCR reactions. The first used the 5'-end primer used for the normal RNase P template and a primer with the sequence: TTTGGCCTTGCTCCGTGCCCTATGGAGCC. This later primer was complementary to the region that spanned the 87-241 deletion. The 3'-end primer used to produce the normal RNase P template was used in a PCR reaction with a primer with the sequence: CGGAGCAAGGCCAAA. This primer matches the sequence from 242 to 256 in RNase P RNA. The two purified PCR-amplified fragments obtained in these reactions were then combined and PCR-amplified once more with the same primers used to make the normal RNase P template. This resulted in a transcription template that could produce the [Delta]87-241 P RNA (Fig. 1 ). This PCR-generated DNA was also cloned and sequenced in pUC18.

RNA transcription

The cloned and sequenced templates described above were linearized with Kpn I to generate RNA by using T7 RNA polymerase transcription with the RiboMAX kit (Promega). The resulting RNA transcripts were further purified on 5% polyacrylamide-7 M urea gels although only one RNA of the expected size was produced from each transcription. As a precaution against the possibility of contamination with the normal RNase P RNA, the deleted versions RNAs were run on separate gels. The secondary structures for the resulting RNase P RNA deletion mutants shown in Figure 1 are only conjectural. They assume that the RNA secondary conformations will follow the phylogenetically determined model of the full length RNase P RNA.

The protein component of RNase P

The vector used to express the protein component of RNase P has been described in a previous paper ( 20 ). This vector was used to express the protein with an N-terminal leader that contains six consecutive histidine residues that can be used to bind to a Ni-agarose column under either native or denaturing conditions. To remove all traces of the host bacteria's RNA from this preparation, the recombinant protein was put through an extensive purification procedure. The `His-tagged P' protein is extracted from the host by lysis in 6 M guanidine-HCl, loaded on the Ni-agarose column, washed extensively with 8 M urea, and eluted with a low pH buffer in 8 M urea ( 24 ). The protein in 8 M urea is then passed through DEAE-cellulose to remove any RNA contaminant that survived the first step. The resulting material is then loaded on a carboxymethyl-agarose in 8 M urea and eluted with a 0-300 mM NaCl gradient in 8 M urea, a method similar to purification procedures used for the wild-type P protein ( 25 ). RNA should not bind to the carboxymethyl-agarose directly, and the urea should keep the RNA from binding to the protein. The protein is then loaded on a new Ni-agarose column in 8 M urea, again washed extensively, and then refolded on the column by using a gentle gradient (50 column volumes) to remove the urea. The pure renatured protein is eluted with 250 mM imidazole and is kept at -20oC in 50% glycerol at concentrations of 0.5-1 mg/ml. It is very stable under these conditions for >= 12 months and shows no RNase P activity without the addition of the catalytic RNA component.

The tRNA His precursor substrate for RNase P

The 32 P-labeled B.subtilis tRNA His precursor substrate used for this work was prepared by SP6 RNA polymerase transcription of a gene cloned into a pSP64 plasmid ( 21 ). Normal RNase P cleavage of this substrate produces a eight base-pair aminoacyl stem ( 21 ).

RNase P processing

The processing of the substrate by the normal and deleted RNA component of RNase P was attempted in three different buffers. They were: 100 mM NH 4 Cl, 100 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG, M.W. 8000; Sigma); 1.2 M NH 4 Cl, 250 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0; and 3 M NH 4 OAc, 250 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).

Assays of the normal RNase P RNA component with the recombinant protein were performed as described previously ( 20 ). The processing of the substrate by normal and deleted RNA versions of the RNase P holoenzyme was performed in an unusually low ionic strength buffer containing 50 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5. This buffer was optimized for the RNA deletion mutants but was not optimal for the normal reconstituted RNase P. To increase the activity of the deleted RNA-containing holoenzyme, PEG (M.W. 8000, Sigma) concentrations in the range of 5-20% were used.

The kinetic constants of normal and [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing RNase P were determined in 50 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5% PEG buffer at 37oC. The substrate was the 32 P-labeled histidine tRNA precursor. The normal RNase P concentration was 5 * 10 -9 M, with substrate concentrations ranging from 0.067 * 10 -6 to 10 -6 M. The [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing RNase P concentration was 10 -7 M, with substrate concentrations ranging from 0.067 * 10 -5 to 10 -5 M. The kinetic values for the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing holoenzyme are approximations because of the practical difficulties in achieving substrate concentrations in excess of its K m . Products and substrate were separated by gel electrophoresis ( 21 ). The buffer concentration is not optimal for normal RNase P and represents a compromise between increased activity of the deletion mutant and loss of specificity. Without PEG, the activity of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing RNase P was too slight to obtain kinetic data.

Determination of the RNase P cleavage site

The substrate cleavage site caused by the normal and deleted RNase P RNA was determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of the cleavage products as described previously ( 21 ).

RESULTS

Figure 2 A shows an autoradiograph of an attempt to cleave the substrate in high ionic strength buffer without the protein component. Unlike the normal RNase P RNA, neither the [Delta]87-241 nor the [Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA alone had any detectable ability to cleave the histidine tRNA precursor in high ionic strength buffers. In addition to the buffer used in Figure 2 A , two other buffers were tried, also without success: 100 mM NH 4 Cl, 100 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5% PEG (M.W. 8000; Sigma); and 3 M NH 4 OAc, 250 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.01% SDS. If the two deleted RNase P RNAs have any substrate cleavage ability, it must be at least four orders of magnitude lower than that of normal RNase P RNA. However, in the presence of the RNase P protein component in a low ionic strength buffer, the [Delta]87-241 P RNA demonstrated significant and specific catalytic cleavage of the histidine tRNA precursor (Fig. 2 B). The cleavage site was the same as that of the normal RNase P and resulted in an 8 bp histidine-tRNA aminoacyl stem ( 21 ). However, even in the presence of the RNase P protein component, the [Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA could not cleave the substrate. The buffer used for these holoenzyme reactions contained 5% PEG, which, compared to buffers without PEG, improved the cleavage reaction of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme by at least an order of magnitude.


Figure 2 . ( A ) Autoradiograph of the cleavage of the 32 P-labeled histidine-tRNA precursor in a high ionic strength buffer by normal RNase P RNA (`P'), and by [Delta]87-241 and [Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA without RNase P protein. In all lanes the substrate concentration was 2 [mu]M and the buffer was 1.2 M NH 4 Cl, 250 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0. The concentration of the normal RNase P RNA, when present, was 0.02 [mu]M, and those of the RNase P RNA deletion mutants were both 2 [mu]M. All reactions were incubated at 37oC for 3 h. ( B ) Cleavage of the histidine tRNA precursor in low ionic strength buffer with or without the RNase P protein (`prot'). In all lanes the substrate concentration was 2 [mu]M and the buffer was 50 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5% PEG (M.W. 8000; Sigma). The normal RNase P RNA (`P'), when present, was 0.05 [mu]M, and those of the deletion mutants were both 0.2 [mu]M. The RNase P protein, when present, was at the same concentration as the RNase P RNAs except in the RNase P protein-alone control, where the concentration was 0.2 [mu]M. All reactions were incubated at 37oC for 3 h. The arrows on the right label the uncleaved substrate (`S'), 5'-matured tRNA product (`Prod'), and the 5'-leader (`L').

Ideally, we would like to determine the K d for the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-protein interaction. However, complications arise because the very positively charged protein component binds to virtually any nucleic acid to form aggregates at concentrations >40 nM ( 9 , 26 ). Although the normal RNase P RNA-protein complex has a K d of 0.4 nM, deletions of even relatively small regions in the same area as the 87-241 deletion result in significant reductions in protein binding, so the K d for the protein for such RNAs can only be estimated as being >40 nM ( 9 ). Therefore, it is not surprising that our [Delta]87-241 P RNA also has a similar reduced affinity for the protein component and its specific K d can not be determined by gel retardation or by binding to the Ni-agarose column used to purify the `His-tagged' protein component. However, it is possible to determine the functional stoichiometry of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-protein complex under the same conditions as used in Figure 2 B. These results, obtained while the reaction was in the linear range at a substrate concentration <0.1 of the K m , indicate that the optimum activity of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA is reached at a 1:1 ratio with the protein component even in the presence of a 10-fold excess of tRNA precursor substrate (Fig. 3 ). The RNase P protein also has its optimal activity at a 1:1 ratio with the normal RNase P RNA ( 20 ). Therefore, even though the deletion of RNase P RNA residues 87-241 significantly reduced the binding to the protein component, a active 1:1 complex can still be formed. Although it is likely that the protein component has RNA binding sites in the region of residues 87-241 ( 9 ), the other binding sites in the rest of the RNA must enable the formation of a weaker though still functional holoenzyme complex.


Figure 3 . The optimum ratio of the RNase P protein component to the [Delta]87-241 P RNA for substrate cleavage. The buffer was the same as in Figure 2B. In all lanes the substrate concentration was 2 [mu]M. The first lane was a substrate only control. The second lane had 3.2 [mu]M P protein added with no catalytic RNA. The last six lanes all had 0.2 [mu]M [Delta]87-241 P RNA. The ratio of P protein to the [Delta]87-241 P RNA (`prot/[Delta]RNA') is shown above the last seven lanes. All reactions were incubated at 37oC for 3 h.

The experiment shown in Figure 4 was performed to examine the dependence of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme reaction on PEG. The control reactions demonstrated that PEG with the RNase P protein alone or with the RNA component alone did not result in substrate cleavage. The normal RNase P holoenzyme is inhibited by PEG. Conversely, the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme was greatly aided by >= 5% PEG. At higher PEG concentration, the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme activity was even more significant but this increase came with a loss in cleavage specificity. Reverse transcriptase-dideoxy sequencing ( 21 ) of the reaction product showed that, as the PEG concentration rose above 5%, there was a significant amount of cleavage one base farther into the substrate, resulting in a 7 bp aminoacyl stem. At 15% PEG, most of the product was cleaved at this position. We also found that the 5'-leader cleaved from the substrate was not increased in length by one base as might be expected. This is consistent with a one-base `nibble' after the initial correct cleavage, a phenomenon also seen in the cleavage of histidine tRNA precursor mutants by normal RNase P ( 22 ). At PEG concentrations of >= 15%, the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme cleaves the substrate at many additional sites, an indication of a profound loss of specificity. PEG concentrations >20% prevent any cleavage because the RNAs precipitate. The ionic strength of the buffer used for the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme is lower than that used for optimal activity of normal RNase P ( 6 , 11 ). Increasing the ionic strength of this buffer also increases the amount of product with a seven base-paired aminoacyl stem.

Table 1 . Kinetic constants of normal and [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing RNase P in 50 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5% PEG buffer at 37oC
RNA component

K m (M)

k cat (min -1 )

Normal RNase P RNA

1.9 * 10 -7

0.26

[Delta]87-241 P RNA

~2 * 10 -5

~0.3

The kinetic values for the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-containing holoenzyme are approximations because of the practical difficulties in achieving substrate concentrations in excess of its K m . The buffer concentration is not optimal for normal RNase P and represents a compromise between increased activity of the deletion mutant and loss of specificity.

Although the buffer conditions for the substrate cleavage performed by the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme are not optimum for the normal RNase P, they can be used to compare relative kinetic constants for the two catalytic species. Without the presence of PEG, the activity of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme is too slight to obtain kinetic data. Table 1 compares the K m and k cat of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA holoenzyme with those of normal RNase P under the same buffer conditions. The K m of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA holoenzyme is 100-fold higher, indicating that the substrate has much poorer binding to this catalyst. Interestingly, the k cat is approximately the same, indicating that the catalytic core of the RNA moiety, when bound to the protein component, is not affected significantly by the deletion of residues 87-241.


Figure 4 . The effect of PEG on normal and [Delta]87-241 P RNA holoenzyme. In all lanes the histidine tRNA substrate concentration was 2 [mu]M. The concentration of normal RNase P RNA, when present, was 0.05 [mu]M, and that of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA was 0.2 [mu]M. When present, the RNase P protein was at the same concentration as the catalytic RNA except for the protein-alone control (in the third lane), where the protein concentration was 0.2 [mu]M. Labels above each lane show the presence of substrate alone (`S'), P protein (`prot'), normal RNase P RNA (`P'), [Delta]87-241 P RNA (`[Delta]'), and the concentration of PEG. Other than the presence or absence of various concentrations of PEG, the buffer was 50 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5. All reactions were incubated at 37oC for 3 h.

DISCUSSION

For the following reasons, contamination of the recombinant RNase P protein preparation with RNase P RNA can be ruled out as an explanation for our results with the [Delta]87-241 P RNA. First, the extensive protein purification performed under denaturing conditions should have removed any of the expression host bacteria's RNA. The resulting RNase P protein preparation had no detectable RNase P activity without the addition of a functional RNA subunit. The RNA components were transcribed from cloned and sequenced plasmid templates. The [Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA served as a good negative control demonstrating that there was no RNase P contamination from the plasmid template or from the transcription reactions. Even though only one RNA of the appropriate size was generated from each of the transcription reactions, it was further purified by gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, the response of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme to the addition of PEG was very different from that of normal RNase P. Finally, the kinetics of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme were the opposite of what would be expected if the observed substrate cleavage was actually due to RNase P contamination. If such contamination had occurred, the K m would be the same as for normal RNase P while the calculated k cat would appear to be many orders of magnitude lower than normal because of the resulting overestimation of the number of catalytic molecules present in the reaction.

The effect of PEG on the [Delta]87-241 P RNA-holoenzyme is quite revealing. In these reactions, PEG is probably functioning as a volume excluder, increasing the effective concentrations of the reactants. Such volume-excluding polymers are often used to increase the rate of nucleic acid and protein-nucleic acid interactions ( 27 - 29 ). The stimulatory effect of PEG indicates that the affinity of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA for the substrate is lower than that of normal RNase P RNA. This is confirmed by the fact that the K m of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA holoenzyme is 100-fold higher than normal RNase P. Partial substitution of phosphorothioate residues in E.coli RNase P RNA have revealed that there are 16 positions at which such modifications interfere with substrate binding ( 30 ). Only two of these positions are absent in [Delta]87-241 P RNA. Most of the other positions that interfere with substrate binding when substituted are clustered in the P4 helix ( 30 ). The most important role for residues 87-241 in PRNA may be to aid substrate binding while excluding non-substrates from the catalytic site. The deletion of the 87-241 region of RNase P may allow the ribozyme to cleave other RNA structures that are normally excluded from the catalytic center, producing the many additional cleavage products seen at high PEG concentrations.

The inability of the [Delta]1-11:344-377 P RNA to cleave the substrate even in the presence of the RNase P protein component again demonstrates the importance of the P4 helix. Schlegel and co-workers ( 31 ) have also found that deleting the same region in the RNase P RNA of Thermus thermophilus abolishes all activity. However, removing the 3'-end of the P1 helix while leaving intact the two P4 helix-forming strands of the T.thermophilus RNase P RNA still allows the mutant to retain a small amount of catalytic activity, indicating that an intact P1 helix is not required ( 31 ). These results are consistent with data indicating that phosphorothioate substitution of some of the residues forming the P4 helix significantly reduces the RNase P RNA's catalytic rate ( 32 ). A possible similarity between the 3-D models of the RNase P RNA P4 helix and Group 1 and Group 2 catalytic introns has been proposed ( 32 ). The deletion of RNase P RNA positions 87-241 may disturb the arrangement of these putative catalytic residues and thus prevent the cleavage reaction in the RNA-alone reaction. The binding of the P protein to the [Delta]87-241 P RNA may restore the correct arrangement of the critical RNA residues to allow substrate cleavage. Alternatively, the protein component may be necessary to adjust the structure of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA to allow substrate binding. The requirement of the [Delta]87-241 P RNA for the protein may be analogous to a deletion mutant of the self-splicing Tetrahymena rRNA ribozyme that cannot function unless a tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is bound to the RNA ( 33 ). The protein appears to substitute for the missing RNA structure.

The deletion of residues 156-205 or 94-204 in the RNase P RNA have been shown to result in RNAs that cannot cleave tRNA precursors either with or without the presence of the protein component ( 10 ). However, with the RNase P protein component, these deletion mutants can still cleave 4.5S RNA precursors. One possible explanation of why these RNAs may have lost their ability to cleave tRNA precursors while the [Delta]87-241 P RNA retains this activity is that the 156-205 and 94-204 deletions have some unstructured RNA that may cause either misfolding of the entire molecule or steric hindrance with some substrates. In contrast, the [Delta]87-241 P RNA was designed to cleanly delete entire helices to prevent the presence of unstructured RNA. These results demonstrate that the region from residue 87 to residues 241 of the E.coli RNase P RNA sequence, forming helices P7 through P14, is not required for catalysis but appears to have a role in promoting the proper folding of the RNA's catalytic center and the binding of the substrate. Other smaller regions of this catalytic RNA, forming helices P3, P6, P16, P17 and P18, have been found by others to be unnecessary for catalysis ( 6 , 7 ). These previous findings and our data presented here show that the catalytic core of the RNase P RNA is present in the residues forming the P2, P4, P5 and P15 helices and the single-stranded regions connecting them. It is interesting to note that the smallest known RNase P RNA is that of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera mitochondria ( 34 ). This yeast mitochondrial RNA is not catalytic without its protein component and it is not clear whether the catalytic center of the yeast mitochondrial enzyme actually resides in the RNA. Phylogenetic and secondary structural analyses of yeast mitochondrial RNase P RNAs are difficult because of their extremely AU-rich nature. However, this 140 base-long RNA does have the potential to form the equivalent of the P4 helix ( 34 ) and can even be folded into a structure resembling the proposed bacterial RNase P catalytic core. This S.fibuligera mitochondrial RNA may represent nature's attempt to find the minimum catalytic core of RNase P RNA.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Supported by NIH grant GM29231-12 to B.V.

REFERENCES

1 Guerrier-Takada,C., Gardiner,K., Marsh,T., Pace,N. and Altman,S. (1983) Cell 35, 849-857.

2 Reich,C., Olsen,G.J., Pace,B. and Pace,N.R. (1988) Science 239, 178-181. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Brown,J.W. and Pace,N.R. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1451-1456. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Harris,M.E., Nolan,J.M., Malhotra,A., Brown,J.W., Harvey,S.C. and Pace,N.R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3953-3963. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Waugh,D.S., Green,C.J. and Pace,N.R. (1989) Science 244, 1569-1570. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Darr,S.C., Zito,K., Smith,D. and Pace,N.R. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 328-333. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Haas,E.S., Brown,J.W., Pitulle,C. and Pace,N.R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2527-2531. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Altman,S., Kirsebom,L. and Talbot,S. (1993) FASEB J. 7, 7-14. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Talbot,S.J. and Altman,S. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 1399-1405. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Guerrier-Takada,C. and Altman,S. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1266-1270.

11 Guerrier-Takada,C. and Altman,S. (1993) Biochemistry 32,7152-7161.

12 Kazakov,S. and Altman,S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9193-9197. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Westhof,E. and Altman,S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5133-5137. MEDLINE Abstract

14 McClain,W.H., Guerrier-Takada,C. and Altman,S. (1987) Science 238, 527-530. MEDLINE Abstract

15 LaGrandeur,T.E., Darr,S.C., Haas,E.S. and Pace,N.R. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 5043-5048. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Nieuwlandt,D.T., Haas,E.S. and Daniels,C.J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5689-5695. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Kirsebom,L.A. and Svard,S.G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4870-4876. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Kirsebom,L.A. and Svard,S.G. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 231, 594-604. MEDLINE Abstract

19 LaGrandeur,T.E., Hüttenhofer,A., Noller,H.F. and Pace,N.R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3945-3952. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Rivera-León,R., Green,C.J. and Vold,B.S. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 2564-2566.

21 Green,C.J. and Vold,B.S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 652-657. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Burkard,U., Willis,I. and Söll,D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2447-2451. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Orellana,O., Cooley,L. and Söll,D. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 525-529. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Gentz,R., Chen,C.-H. and Rosen,C. A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 821-824. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Baer,M.F., Arnez,J.G., Guerrier,T.C., Vioque,A. and Altman,S. (1990) 181, 569-582.

26 Vioque,A., Arnez,J. and Altman,S. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 202, 835-848. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Amasino,R.M. (1986) Anal. Biochem. 152, 304-307. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Fuller,R.S., Kaguni,J.M., Kornberg,A. (1981), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7370-7374.

29 Wetmur,J.G. (1975), Biopolymers 14, 2517-2524.

30 Hardt,W.-D., Warnecke,J.M., Erdmann,V.A. and Hartmann,R.K. (1995) EMBO 14, 2935-2944.

31 Schlegl,J., Hardt,W.D., Erdmann,V.A. and Hartmann,R.K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4863-4869. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Harris,M.E. and Pace,N. (1995) RNA 1, 210-218. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Mohr,G., Caprara,M.G., Guo,Q. and Lambowitz,A.M. (1994) Nature 370, 147-150. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Wise,C.A. and Martin,N.C. (1991) J. Biol.Chem. 266, 19154-19157.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. K. Pulukkunat and V. Gopalan
Studies on Methanocaldococcus jannaschii RNase P reveal insights into the roles of RNA and protein cofactors in RNase P catalysis
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(12): 4172 - 4180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H.-Y. Tsai, D. K. Pulukkunat, W. K. Woznick, and V. Gopalan
Functional reconstitution and characterization of Pyrococcus furiosus RNase P
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16147 - 16152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
M. K. Butler and J. A. Fuerst
Comparative analysis of ribonuclease P RNA of the planctomycetes
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, July 1, 2004; 54(4): 1333 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Koller, U. F. Muller, B. Schmid, A. Missel, V. Kruft, K. Stuart, and H. U. Goringer
Trypanosoma brucei gBP21. AN ARGININE-RICH MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN THAT BINDS TO GUIDE RNA WITH HIGH AFFINITY
J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 1997; 272(6): 3749 - 3757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (105K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vold, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vold, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?