Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (102K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 1561-1566

Footnote

Mutation spectra of TA*, the major photoproduct of thymidylyl-(3 ' -5')-deoxyadenosine, in Escherichia coli under SOS conditions

Mutation spectra of TA*, the major photoproduct of thymidylyl-(3 ' -5')-deoxyadenosine, in Escherichia coli under SOS conditions Xiaodong Zhao and John-Stephen Taylor*

Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St Louis , MO 63130-4899, USA

Received October 3, 1995; Revised and Accepted March 5, 1996

ABSTRACT

The biological activity of TA*, the major photoproduct of thymidylyl-(3 ' ,5 ' )-deoxyadenosine, has remained speculative since it was identified a decade ago. To determine the mutagenicity of TA* in Escherichia coli , we constructed the replicative form of an M13mp18-derived phage containing TA* in the (-)-strand by polymerase-catalyzed elongation of a TA*-containing 49mer opposite a uracil-containing (+)-strand of the phage. The in vitro synthesis mixture was transfected into an ung + , phr - E.coli host and the progeny were screened with a hybridization probe unique for the (-)-strand. TA* was found to block DNA replication substantially in the absence of SOS, but under SOS, TA* was bypassed more efficiently and was highly mutagenic. Among 56 analyzed (-)-strand progeny from two transfections, 46 (82%) were mutants, including six (11%) tandem mutants. The most abundant mutation was a 3 ' A -> T substitution (31/46, 56%). The possible biological consequences of TA* formation in the highly conserved TATA box consensus sequence on gene expression are discussed in light of the mutagenicity of TA*. INTRODUCTION

Each gene carries not only protein sequence coding sequences, but also regulatory elements for its expression, such as promoters, enhancers and silencers. Mutations in the coding region could lead to a mutant protein with altered or defective properties, whereas mutations in the promoter region could affect proper gene regulation. The TATA box sequence of promoters is highly conserved ( 1 , 2 ) and critical for gene expression in many cases, though the effect of a particular mutation is gene-dependent ( 3 - 7 ). In 1983, Davies and co-workers discovered that 254 nm irradiation of TpdA produced a product d(TpA)* ( 8 ) that was proposed to be the [2+2] cycloaddition adduct between the 5,6 double bonds of the T and the A ( 9 , 10 ) (Fig. 1 , structure 1a). We have recently carried out further spectroscopic studies which indicate that TA* photoproduct is actually a valence isomer of the [2+2] adduct, (Fig. 1 , structure 2a) ( 11 ) which explains why TA* is not photoreversed by 254 nm irradiation ( 1 ). This photoproduct is also produced by 254 nm irradiation of DNA (hereafter referred to as TA*, structure 2b) with a quantum yield of 10-100 less than dipyrimidine products ( 12 ). Despite its low yield, its discoverers noted that the TATA sequence of promoters has four potential sites for TA* photoproduct formation that could lead to mutations that permanently interfere with expression of the downstream gene ( 8 , 12 ). The mutagenic properties of the TA* photoproduct have remained unknown, however, primarily because of a lack of methods for preparing pure, well characterized TA*-containing substrates for in vitro and in vivo replication studies.

Recently, we isolated two TA* photoproduct-containing octamers produced by 254 nm irradiation of d(GTATTATG), and were able to ligate one of these two, d(GTATTA*TG), into a 49mer ( 13 ). We found that the TA* product could be bypassed by both exo - KF and an exo - T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase Version 2.0), but we were unable to determine if the bypass reactions were mutagenic. Herein, we report that bypass of TA* in the (-)-strand of the replicative form of an M13mp18-derived vector in a repair-deficient E.coli host under SOS conditions leads predominantly to TA* -> TT mutations. The implications of the mutagenicity of TA* for transcription involving TATA sequences is also discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The TA*-containing 49mer was prepared as previously described ( 13 ) by ligation of a TA*-containing octamer to two other oligonucleotides in the presence of an overlapping 35mer scaffold. The M13 clone XZ1 was prepared by Kunkel's method for site-directed mutagenesis ( 14 ) of (+)-CS1 ( 15 ) with the 35mer shown in Figure 2 . Uracil substituted (+)-XZ1 was isolated from dut - ung - E.coli CJ236. The details of the procedures used to obtain the TA* mutation spectrum were the same as previously described for the cis-syn dimer of TT and TU ( 16 ) with some modifications as noted. Briefly, 4 pmol 5'-phosphorylated 49-TA*-mer was used to prime (-)-strand synthesis by T4 polymerase and dNTPs opposite 1 pmol uracil-containing (+)-XZ1 in the presence of T4 ligase and ATP for 10 min at 0oC, 10 min at 10oC and 2 h at 37oC. Subsequent treatment with uracil glycosylase was omitted, and the reaction was allowed to proceed overnight incubation at 17oC. One third of the reaction mixture was used to transfect competent SOS + and SOS - CSRO6F' E.coli according to standard procedures ( 17 ). SOS-induced cells were prepared by 254 nm irradiation at 4oC followed by incubation at 37oC in LB for 30 min prior to being made competent in the same way as the non-SOS induced cells. The transfected cells were mixed with top agar containing log-phase DH5[alpha]F' cells and plated on LB plates. Plaques were then transferred to a master plate and to replica plates that were covered with nitrocellulose filters. The nitrocellulose filters were probed by hybridization overnight with either 19-CC-mer or 19-TA-mer at 37oC and selected plaques were sequenced by the dideoxy method. The chi-square ([chi] 2 ) test was used to evaluate the significance of differences in mutation spectra by sorting mutations into three categories, TA* -> TT, TA and other, for which the expected values were >= 5 which avoids significant errors in the analysis.

RESULTS

The mutation spectra of TA* were obtained by a general method previously described by us for obtaining the mutation spectra of the cis-syn dimer of TU and TT ( 16 ). Our method is based on Kunkel's method for site-directed mutagenesis ( 14 , 18 ) and involves constructing a heteroduplex containing a small fraction of the thymines replaced by uracils in the (+)-strand and a site specific photoproduct in the (-)-strand (Fig. 2 ). The idea is that, when transfected into a uracil glycosylase active ( ung + ), photoproduct repair deficient ( phr - , uvr - ) E.coli host, the (+)-strand will be rapidly and selectively degraded, thereby favoring replication of the photoproduct-containing (-)-strand. To distinguish progeny of the (-)-strand from progeny of the (+)-strand, a double mismatch is introduced into the RF phage, either adjacent to, or opposite the photoproduct. Originally, we had hoped that a single double mismatch could be introduced at some distance from the photoproduct site so as not to alter the sequence and hence structure of the photodamaged DNA. In experiments with other photoproducts, however, we have found that a small amount of double mismatch correction occurs in the (+)-strand which diminishes the apparent mutagenicity of the photoproduct ( 15 ). It appears that the repair of the double mismatch results from nick translation synthesis initiated at sites of Us, which would explain why the correction is confined to the (+)-strand when mismatch correction would have directed repair to the (-)-strand ( 19 ). As a result, we now know that the double mismatch must be incorporated opposite the photoproduct to obtain an accurate estimation of the mutagenicity of a photoproduct, as we had originally done in obtaining the mutation spectra of the cis-syn dimers of TT and TU ( 16 ).


Figure 1 . Structure of the TA* photoproduct and the presumed [2+2] intermediate. The stereochemistry of the T5 and T6 carbons is not known with certainty, but is either 5 S ,6 R which would arise from a cis-syn [2+2] adduct, or 5 R ,6 S which would arise from the trans-syn-I [2+2] adduct.


Figure 2 . Scheme and oligonucleotides used to obtain the mutation spectra of TA*.


Construction of TA*-containing heteroduplex RF phage

To produce a heteroduplex M13 phage containing a GG double mismatch opposite TA*, bacteriophage XZ1 was prepared by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis ( 14 , 18 ) of CS1 ( 15 ), which is complementary to TA*-49-mer, except for a double mismatch 12 nucleotides to the 3'-side of TA* (Fig. 2 ). Uracil-containing (+)-XZ1 was then isolated from transfected dut - ung - E.coli CJ236 and used as a (+)-strand template for primer extension of TA*-49-mer by T4 DNA polymerase to form the TA*-containing (-)-strand of the bacteriophage DNA following ligation with T4 DNA ligase and ATP.

Table 1 . Results of transfection of ung + phr - uvr - E.coli CRSO6F' with TA*-containing (-)-strand and uracil-containing (+)-strand heteroduplex bacteriophage under SOS and non-SOS conditions

Cell

(+)-strand

(-)-strand progeny/

(-) mutants/

(+) mutants/

no. probed (%)

no. sequenced

no. sequenced

1

SOS+

uracil-containing

24/250 (10%)

22/24

0/9

2

SOS+

uracil-containing

31/400 (8%)

23/31

1/27

3

SOS-

uracil-containing

3/250 (1%)

0/3

0/15

4

SOS+

non-uracil containing

0/300 (0%)

-

-

Mutation spectra

Progeny of the (+)-strand resulting from transfection into photoproduct repair deficient ( phr -1, uvr A6) E.coli strain CSRO6F' ( 20 ) were detected by hybridization with 19-CC-mer, whereas progeny resulting from non-mutagenic bypass of the TA* product were detected by hybridization with 19-TA-mer. In the absence of SOS induction, the proportion of progeny of the TA*-containing (-)-strand was only 3/250 or 1% of the randomly selected bacteriophage plaques, indicating that the photoproduct was a substantial block to replication (Table 1 ). The three (-)-strand progeny were sequenced and found to have the wild-type sequence. In the SOS-induced cells, the proportion of the (-)-strand progeny increased to an average of 8.5% for two independent transfections (55/650). When non-uracil-containing (+)-XZ1 was used to construct the TA*-containing phage, no progeny of the photoproduct-containing (-)-strand were detected out of 300 plaques that were probed. While the 19-CC-mer could distinguish (+)- and (-)-strand progeny successfully, the 19-TA-mer could not distinguish between wild type and mutant (-)-strand progeny and all (-)-strand progeny were sequenced. From a total of 55 sequenced (-)-strand progeny from two independent transfection experiments, 46 (82%) were mutants and of these 42 (91%) were substitution mutants targeted opposite the TA* site. Of the targeted mutations, 35/46 (76%) were single base substitutions opposite the A of TA*, and only 1/46 (2%) was a single base substitution opposite the T of TA*. The frequency of tandem mutations was also rather high and constituted 6/46 (13%) of the targeted mutations. The most frequent targeted mutation (31/46 or 67%) was the substitution of A for T opposite the A of TA*. Non-targeted substitution and deletion mutations were also observed nearby the photoproduct site with a low frequency (4/55, 9%).

The mutation spectra for the two independent transfections were not significantly different ( P < 0.25), but because the two transfections were carried out a month apart we considered the possibility that the apparent difference was due to partial decomposition of TA*. In our original preparation of the 49-TA*-mer, 14% of the sample contained degradation products corresponding to strand cleavage in the vicinity of the TA* ( 16 ). In a second preparation, in which care was taken not to unnecessarily heat the sample, only 3% of the degradation products were observed. To further investigate the stability of TA*, we carried out an HPLC analysis of TA*-containing octamer, 8-TA*-mer, under a variety of conditions. The TA*-containing octamer was found not to decompose to any products that were separable by C-18 HPLC when kept frozen in water at -20oC for 2 months. After one week at room temperature ~12% of a product with a longer retention time was observed, which could be produced in ~40% yield after heating for only 20 min at 100oC. With regard to possible decomposition of the samples used to obtain the mutation spectra, we note that the first transfection was carried out with TA*-containing bacteriophage that had been synthesized the day before with the second preparation of the 49-TA*-mer. This 49mer had been constructed ~3 months previously from the 8-TA*-mer and had been stored at -20oC. The second transfection was carried out with the same 49-TA*-mer 1 month later with a new batch of competent cells and TA*-containing bacteriophage prepared two days earlier. The only times that the 8-TA*-mer used in the preparation of the TA*-49-mer was allowed to warm above -20oC was when it was incorporated into the 49mer by ligation for 10 h from 0-16oC followed by purification at room temperature for 2 h by gel electrophoresis and elution from the gel at 4oC overnight. The 49-TA*-mer was again warmed for 1 h at 37oC for RF bacteriophage synthesis, and 1 h at 0oC for transfection followed by heat shock at 42oC for 90 s before plating. Though everything possible was done to minimize decomposition of TA* for the in vivo mutation studies, it is possible that some small fraction (<5%) of TA* decomposed to at least one other product. Because most biological systems of interest are normally at 37oC, we would also expect that TA* product produced in vivo would also decompose to some small extent before DNA synthesis bypass.

DISCUSSION

In non-SOS cells, TA* appeared to block replication as judged by the very low proportion (1%) of progeny from the photoproduct-containing (-)-strand relative to those from the uracil-containing (+)-strand. The ability of TA* to block normal replication in E.coli is similar to what has been observed for the cis-syn, (6-4) and Dewar photoproducts of TT ( 21 , 22 ), which are also dinucleotide photoproducts. One notable exception is the trans-syn dimer of TT which has been reported to be bypassed to a significant extent under non-SOS conditions in one sequence context ( 23 ) but not in another ( 15 ). Photodimerization of adjacent bases fixes their relative orientation and restricts the conformational flexibility of the entire dinucleotide subunit, which would explain why bypass of dinucleotide photoproducts is inhibited. In SOS cells, however, the proportion of (-)-strand progeny increased to 8.5%, suggesting that TA* is more easily bypassed than in the non-SOS cells, again consistent with what has been observed for the other DNA photoproducts, and what is known about the SOS response ( 24 , 25 ).

Possible mechanistic origins of the observed mutations

In contrast to the observation that none of the three progeny of the TA*-containing-strand in non-SOS cells were mutants, 82% of the TA* progeny in SOS cells were mutants (Table 2 ). The majority of these mutants (78%) were single base substitutions and the rest were tandem mutations (13%), one near targeted substitution (2%) and three 29 bp deletions coupled to a substitution (7%). One possible mechanism for the origin of the targeted single and tandem substitution mutations is one in which nucleotides are sequentially incorporated opposite the TA* product (Fig. 3 ). To account for the observed mutations, nucleotides would have to be first incorporated opposite the 3'-A of TA* with an overall selectivity of A >> T > G > C. In the second step, nucleotides would have to be incorporated opposite the 5'-T of TA* with an overall selectivity of A >> G > T > C. We use the term overall selectivity to refer to the net result of a competition between nucleotide incorporation, 3' -> 5' exonucleolytic cleavage (proofreading), and subsequent nucleotide incorporation and proofreading steps opposite and completely past the photoproduct site. The origin of the near targeted substitution and 29 bp deletion coupled with a substitution is not understood at this time.


Figure 3 . Selectivity of the individual steps in the sequential bypass mechanism of TA* that would explain the observed mutations.

Table 2 . Progeny from transfection of ung + phr - uvr - E.coli CRSO6F' with TA*-containing (-)-strand and uracil-containing (+)-strand heteroduplex bacteriophage under SOS conditions
(-)-strand

Transfection 1

Transfection 2

Average

Percentage

sequence

(%)

(%)

frequency (%)

of mutants

TA

2 (8)

8 (25)

18

-

T T

15 (62)

16 (50)

55

67

T C

-

3 (9)

5

5

T G

1 (4)

-

2

2

C A

1 (4)

-

2

2

AT

1 (4)

1 (3)

4

4

CT

1 (4)

2 (6)

5

7

CC

1 (4)

-

2

2

Other a

1 (4)

-

2

2

Deletion b

1 (4)

2 (6)

5

7

a A -> T : 5'-GTATTA*TGC T ATT b [-29-mer] + T -> C : 5'-TG[-CCAAGCTACCATGCCTGCACGTATTA*TGC]A- AT C

The high selectivity for incorporation of A opposite both nucleotides of TA* follows the `A rule' ( 26 ), and is similar to what has been observed for both the cis-syn and trans-syn-I dimers of TT ( 16 , 22 , 23 ), and what has been proposed for the cis-syn dimers containing C ( 16 ). The A rule was formulated to account for the high frequency of AMP incorporation opposite certain types of DNA damage including cis-syn dimers and abasic sites, which were collectively classified as non-instructional because abasic sites are presumably incapable of base pairing. The idea that cis-syn dimers and other photoproducts can be classified as non-instructional has been called into question, however, primarily because of the much higher frequency of A incorporation than is observed for abasic sites, and the fact that the photoproducts retain their ability to hydrogen bond ( 27 ). It is likewise hard to view the TA* product as non-instructional, even though the relative frequency for nucleotide incorporation opposite each nucleotide of TA* is quite similar to that of A > G ~ T > C observed opposite abasic sites ( 28 ).

If the newly proposed structure for TA* is correct ( 11 ), the 5 S ,6 R isomer is structurally most similar to the cis-syn cyclobutane dimer of TC, as both arise from photodimerization of the bases in anti glycosyl conformations, and both contain similar hydrogen bonding functionality. We have not been able to rule out that TA* has the 5 R ,6 S stereochemistry, which would arise from dimerization of the bases in a syn , anti glycosyl conformation, and be structurally most similar to the trans-syn-I dimer of TC. The T in the 5 S ,6 R isomer of TA* retains its base-pairing specificity (Fig. 4 A), while the T in the 5R,6S isomer would behave like the 5'-T of the trans-syn-I isomer of TT (Fig. 4 B) which is known to direct the incorporation of A in a variety of sequence contexts ( 15 , 23 ). The amidino functionality of the A can adopt an amino form which codes as C (or A) and a tautomeric E -imino form that codes as a T (or G), as has been proposed for the C in a cis-syn dimer ( 16 ) (Fig. 4 C and D). Hydrogen bonding alone cannot explain the origin of the preference for incorporation of A over G opposite the A of TA*, as there does not appear to be any strong electronic bias for the imino tautomer over the amino tautomer. Unlike the amidino group of N 1-cyclohexyl-5,6-dihydrocytosine, which is conjugated with the C2 carbonyl and found to prefer the imino tautomer in non-polar media ( 29 ), the amidino group in TA* is not conjugated to the adjacent double bond because the tub shape of the ring system prevents [pi]-bond overlap, and thus is expected to exist in both imino and amino forms.


Figure 4 . Possible base pairing schemes to explain the major product of TA* bypass in E.coli under SOS conditions and their comparison with base pairing schemes for the cis-syn and the trans-syn-I dimers of TC. ( A ) T[middot]A base pair in the 5 S ,6 R -TA* product and the cis-syn dimer, ( B ) T[middot]A base pair in the 5 R ,6 S -TA* product and the trans-syn-I dimer, ( C ) E -imino A[middot]A base pair in both TA* isomers and ( D ) E -imino C[middot]A base pair in the cis-syn dimer.

Because of the two T's flanking TA* in the substrate used to obtain the mutation spectrum, it is also possible that the A incorporated opposite the A of TA* results from a transient misalignment pathway ( 30 ). In one such mechanism, the primer terminating in A prior to TA* misaligns so that it now terminates opposite the A of TA* to give a one base bulge in the template-strand. Extension opposite the T of TA* with A followed by realignment would result in the incorporation of an A opposite the A of TA*. In another mechanism, the primer terminating in A prior to TA* misaligns so that it now terminates opposite the T of TA* to give a two base bulge. Extension opposite the T flanking TA* with A followed by realignment would also result in the incorporation of A opposite the A of TA*. Similar intermediates have been used to explain the origin of a substitution mutation and deletion mutations caused by in vitro bypass of a cis-syn TT dimer flanked by two Ts ( 31 ). Neither of the two misalignment mechanisms described are considered to be as likely as the sequential incorporation mechanism because of the greater distortion of the primer terminus expected for the bulge loop intermediates. Also no 1 or 2 bp deletion mutations were observed that might be expected to have resulted from competitive elongation of the bulge loop intermediates. Further mutagenesis studies with TA* flanked by different nucleotides will be required to discriminate between sequential misincorporation and misalignment mediated bypass mechanisms for the preferential incorporation of two As opposite this photoproduct.

Biological implications

TA* is a minor photoproduct of DNA, having a quantum yield for induction by 254 nm that is ~0-100 times less than for the cis-syn and (6-4) products respectively ( 12 , 32 ). When the frequency of TA sites were taken into account, it was estimated that 10 TA* products would be produced in the E.coli K12 genome following exposure to one mean lethal fluence of 254 nm (F 37 = 50 Jm -2 ) ( 12 ). Even a minor photoproduct, however, can have a significant biological effect if it is highly mutagenic, not repaired rapidly, and there is an abundant target site which is sensitive to the photoproduct-induced mutations. Davies and co-workers recognized that one abundant and possibly important biological target for TA* formation is the highly conserved TATA sequence of promoters which has four potential photoproduct sites ( 8 , 12 ). We now know that TA* in the sequence context studied is highly mutagenic and causes primarily TA* -> TT mutations. The mutagenicity of TA* is comparable to that of the (6-4) product of TT (57-85% TT -> TC) ( 15 , 21 ) and the cis-syn dimer of TU, the deamination product of the cis-syn dimer of TC (96% TC -> TT) ( 16 ). If TA* -> TT is also the major mutation in a TATA sequence, 254 nm radiation would induce TATA -> TTTA, TATT, TAAA and AATA mutations by way of the four potential TA* sites. In a study of the P22 promoter activity for the antirepressor gene, all the possible T[middot]A -> A[middot]T transversions in TATA resulted in a reduction of promoter activity for E.coli RNA polymerase in vitro , and was most severe for transversion mutations at the first two sites ( 33 ). It was also found that all of these transversion were induced by UV irradiation of P22 followed by transfection into S.typhimurium strain DB7168 which is repair defective and carries the pKM101 plasmid that enables error-prone bypass of UV damage. In a forward mutation assay of 254 nm irradiated single-strand M13mp2, however, no TA -> TT mutation was observed in the -10 TATG sequence of the lac promoter ( 34 ). Only TA -> CA, 2 TG, TC and AC mutations were observed, the first three of which were only minor mutations in our system, and the last of which was not observed at all. Why the TA -> TT mutation was not detected in this system is unknown at the moment, and will have to await further studies of TA* mutagenesis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by NIH Grant R37 CA40463. We also thank Jeremy Davies for helpful discussions.

REFERENCES

1 Bucher,P. and Trifonov,E.N. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 10009-10026.

2 Hawley,D.K. and McClure,W.R. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 2237-2255.

3 Pauly,M., Treger,M., Westhof,E. and Chambon,P. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 975-982.

4 Walker,M.S. and Demoss,J.A. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 1119-1123.

5 De Pater,B.S., De Kam,R.J., Hoge,J.H.C. and Schilperoort,R.A. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8283.

6 Howe,J.G. and Shu,M.D. (1993) Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 2655-2665.

7 Mukumoto,F., Hirose,S., Imaseki,H. and Yamazaki,K.I. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 23, 995-1003.

8 Bose,S.N., Davies,R.J.H., Sethi,S.K. and McCloskey,J.A. (1983) Science 220, 723-725.

9 Bose,S.N., Kumar,S., Davies,R.J.H., Sethi,S.K. and McCloskey,J.A. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7929-7947.

10 Koning,T.M.G., Davies,R.J.H. and Kaptein,R. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 277-284.

11 Zhao,X., Kao,J. and Taylor,J.-S. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 1554-1560.

12 Bose,S.N. and Davies,R.J.H. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7903-7914.

13 Zhao,X., Kao,J.L.F. and Taylor,J.-S. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1386-1392.

14 Kunkel,T.A., Roberts,J.D. and Zakour,R.A. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 154, 367-382.

15 Smith,C.A., Wang,M., Jiang,N., Che,L., Zhao,X. and Taylor,J.-S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 0000.

16 Jiang,N. and Taylor,J.-S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 472-481.

17 Hanahan,D. (1985) In Glover,D.M. (ed.), DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Washington, DC, Vol. 1, pp. 109-135.

18 Kunkel,T.A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 488-492.

19 Modrich,P. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 435-466.

20 Sancar,A. and Rupert,C.S. (1978) Mutat. Res. 51, 139-143.

21 LeClerc,J.E., Borden,A. and Lawrence,C.W. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9685-9689.

22 Banerjee,S.K., Christensen,R.B., Lawrence,C.W. and LeClerc,J.E. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8141-8145.

23 Banerjee,S.K., Borden,A., Christensen,R.B., LeClerc,J.E. and Lawrence,C.W. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 2105-2112.

24 Walker,G.W. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 425-457.

25 Walker,G.C. (1987) In Neidhardt,F.C., Ingraham,J.L., Low,K.B., Magasanik,B., Schaechter,M. and Umbarger,H.E. (eds), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Cellular and Molecular Biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, Vol. 2, pp. 1346-1356.

26 Strauss,B.S. (1991) Bioessays 13, 79-84.

27 Lawrence,C.W., Banerjee,S.K., Borden,A. and LeClerc,J.E. (1990) Mol. Gen. Genet. 222, 166-168.

28 Lawrence,C.W., Borden,A., Banerjee,S.K. and LeClerc,J.E. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 2153-2157.

29 Brown,D.M. and Hewlins,M.J.E. (1968) J. Chem. Soc. C., 2050-2055.

30 Kunkel,T.A. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8003-8011.

31 Wang,C.-I. and Taylor,J.-S. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 3671-3681.

32 Patrick,M.H. (1977) Photochem. Photobiol. 25, 357-372.

33 Youderian,P., Bouvier,S. and Susskind,M.M. (1982) Cell 30, 843-853.

34 LeClerc,J.E., Istock,N.L., Saran,B.R. and Allen,R.J. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 180, 217-237.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. J. H. Davies, J. F. Malone, Y. Gan, C. J. Cardin, M. P.H. Lee, and S. Neidle
High-resolution crystal structure of the intramolecular d(TpA) thymine-adenine photoadduct and its mechanistic implications
Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Otoshi, T. Yagi, T. Mori, T. Matsunaga, O. Nikaido, S.-T. Kim, K. Hitomi, M. Ikenaga, and T. Todo
Respective Roles of Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers, (6-4)Photoproducts, and Minor Photoproducts in Ultraviolet Mutagenesis of Repair-deficient Xeroderma Pigmentosum A Cells
Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(6): 1729 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-H. You, D.-H. Lee, J.-H. Yoon, S. Nakajima, A. Yasui, and G. P. Pfeifer
Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers Are Responsible for the Vast Majority of Mutations Induced by UVB Irradiation in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2001; 276(48): 44688 - 44694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (102K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, X
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?