Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI) of endonuclease digests of RNA
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI) of endonuclease digests of RNAStephanie Hahner, Hans-Christian Lüdemann, Finn Kirpekar1, Eckhard Nordhoff1, Peter Roepstorff1, Hans-Joachim Galla2 and Franz Hillenkamp*
Institute for Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Münster, Robert-Koch-Strasse 31, D-48149 Münster, Germany, 1Department of Molecular Biology, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark and 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Münster, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 2, D-48149 Münster, GermanyRecieved January 24, 1997; Revised and Accepted April 3, 1997
ABSTRACT
The determination of RNA sequences using base- specific enzymatic cleavages is a well established method. Different synthetic RNA molecules were analyzed for uniformity of degradation by RNase T1, U2, A and PhyM under reaction conditions compatible with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS), to identify the positions of G, A and pyrimidine residues. In order to get a complete set of fragments derived from cleavage at every phosphodiester bond, the samples were also subjected to a limited alkaline hydrolysis. Additionally, the 5'-terminus fragments of a 49mer RNA transcript were isolated by way of 5'-biotinylation and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynal), followed by a RNase U2 digestion. MALDI-MS of the generated fragments is presented as an efficient technique for a direct read out of the nucleotide sequence.
INTRODUCTION
Sequencing of RNA is an important step in elucidating its structural features and function. Several fields of research such as the detection of posttranscriptional modifications in rRNA and tRNA (1 ,2 ), the determination of the genomic sequences of different viruses (3 ) and studies in the field of molecular evolution (4 ) all require rapid and reliable sequencing techniques. Classical `Sanger' chain termination sequencing has been used for this purpose, following transcription to cDNA with a reverse transcriptase (5 ). Major limitations of this procedure are a high error rate of the reverse transcriptase (6 ) and the tendency for premature transcription termination caused by secondary structures of the RNA template (7 ,8 ). Although several strategies have been developed to overcome the latter problem (8 ,9 ), base-modified nucleotides-highly abundant in RNA molecules-limit correct transcription (6 ).
Another promising approach for a direct sequencing of RNA involves enzymatic digestion in combination with postlabeling. Several ribonucleases with a high degree of base specificitiy have been employed to yield uniform cleavage patterns. Fragments are generated both by partial as well as complete digests. The introduction of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for RNA sequencing improved the direct readout (10 ). However, sequence determination based solely on electrophoretic or chromatographic mobility still has several limitations. Due to modified nucleotides or regions of tight secondary structure, anomalous migration in the gel has been observed, evident for example, as band compressions (11 ,12 ). Furthermore, long analysis time and the requirement for labeling or staining impair the utility of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation techniques. Mass spectrometric techniques such as MALDI-(13 ) and ESI-MS (14 ) provide new means for the analysis of nucleic acids (15 ). Mass is a more direct and specific property for identification of fragments as compared to electrophoretic or chromatographic mobility. Because labeling or staining is not required and automation can be readily implemented, mass spectrometry offers the potential for fast and large-scale analyses. Application of ESI-MS for detection and sequence location of posttranscriptionally modified nucleotides in ribosomal RNA has been demonstrated by McCloskey and co-workers (1 ,16 ). Reverse-phase HPLC had to be applied after enzymatic hydrolysis to facilitate the subsequent analysis by ESI-mass spectrometry. In general, the analysis of oligonucleotide mixtures is difficult with this technique because of the distribution of different mass dependent charge states for each individual fragment ion, which cannot be sufficiently resolved (17 ), unless complex and expensive Fourier-Transform mass spectrometers are employed (18 ). MALDI generates predominately singly-charged ions. A separation of oligonucleotide fragments, generated by enzymatic or chemical cleavages prior to the mass spectrometric analysis, is, therefore, usually not required, unless very complex mixtures are analyzed. However, mass analysis of oligonucleotides is compromised by salts, buffers and enzymes used for the various sequencing approaches, mainly because of the formation of heterogeneous alkali salts of the oligonucleotides (19 ). For the application of MALDI-MS to a direct read-out of the products of RNA sequencing reactions, it is highly desirable to establish reaction conditions compatible with both the activity of the employed enzymes and the preparation requirements for MALDI.
The use of mono-specific RNases such as RNase T1 (G specific) and RNase U2 (A specific) has become routine (10 ,20 -22 ). Another enzyme, the chicken liver ribonuclease (RNase CL3) has been reported to cleave preferentially at cytidine, but the enzyme's proclivity for this base has been reported to be affected by the reaction conditions (23 ). Recent reports also claim cytidine specificity for another ribonuclease, cusativin, isolated from dry seeds of Cucumis sativus L (24 ). Alternatively, the identification of pyrimidine residues by use of the RNase PhyM (A and U specific) (25 ) and RNase A (C and U specific) (20 ,21 ) has been demonstrated. In order to reduce ambiguities in sequence determination, additional limited alkaline hydrolysis can be performed. Since every phosphodiester bond is potentially cleaved under this conditions, information about omitted and/or unspecific cleavages can be obtained this way (10 ,20 ). Chemical cleavage is not known to be strongly affected by secondary structure, whereas base-specific enzymatic degradation turned out to be (26 ,27 ). Therefore, denaturing conditions which do not disturb the activity and specificity of the RNases are recommended for further improvement towards uniform cleavage (10 ,20 ,23 ,25 ).
In the present study an approach utilizing base-specific ribonucleases in combination with MALDI-MS is described as an alternative method for RNA sequencing. Synthetic oligonucleotides with three different sequences in the range of 20-25 nucleotides were used to examine the specificity of the ribonucleases under optimized reaction conditions. For an isolation and exclusive detection of 5'-terminal fragments streptavidin-coated magnetic beads were applied to a mixture generated by RNase U2 digest of a 49mer in vitro RNA-transcript biotinylated at the 5'-end.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Synthetic RNA (sample A: 5'-UCCGGUCUGAUGAGUCCGUGAGGAC-3'; sample B: 5'-GUCACUACAGGUGAGCUCCA-3'; sample C: 5'-CCAUGCGAGAGUAAGUAGUA-3') were obtained from DNA technology (Aarhus, Denmark) and purified on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel (28 ). RNases T1 (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium), U2 (Calbiochem, Bad Soden, Germany), A (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) and PhyM (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) were used without additional purification. Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin, Dynal) were supplied as a suspension of 6-7 * 108 beads/ml (10 mg/ml) dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% BSA and 0.02% NaN3. 3-Hydroxypicolinic acid (3-HPA) (Aldrich) was purified by a separate desalting step before use as described in more detail elsewhere (18 ).
Methods
In vitro transcription reaction. The 5'-biotinylated 49 nt in vitro transcript (AGGC CUG CGG CAA GAC GGA AAG ACC AUG GUC CCUNAUC UGC CGC AGG AUC) was produced by transcription of the plasmid pUTMS2 (linearized with the restriction enzyme BamHI) with T7 RNA polymerase (Promega). For the transcription reaction 3 [mu]g template DNA and 50 U T7 RNA polymerase were used in a 50 [mu]l volume containing 1 U/[mu]l RNA guard (RNase inhibitor, Pharmacia), 0.5 mM NTPs 1.0 mM 5'-biotin-ApG dinucleotide, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM spermidine and 10 mM DTT. Incubation was performed at 37oC for 1 h; then another aliquot of 50 U T7 RNA polymerase was added and incubation was continued for another hour. The mixture was adjusted to 2 M NH4-acetate and the RNA was precipitated by addition of 1 vol ethanol and 1 vol isopropanol. The precipitated RNA was collected by centrifugation at 20 000 g for 90 min at 4oC, the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried and redissolved in 8 M urea. Further purification was achieved by electrophoresis through a denaturing polyacrylamide gel as described elsewhere (28 ). The ratio of 5'-biotinylated to non-biotinylated transcripts was ~3:1.
Ribonuclease assay. For partial digestions with selected RNases different enzyme concentrations and assay conditions were employed as summarized in Table 1 . The solvents for each enzyme were selected following the suppliers' instructions. The concentrations of the synthetic RNA samples and the in vitro transcript were adjusted to 5-10 * 10-6 M.
The reaction was stopped at selected times by mixing 0.6 [mu]l aliqouts of the assay with 1.5 [mu]l of 3-HPA-solution. The solvent was subsequently evaporated in a stream of cold air for the MALDI-MS analysis.
Limited alkaline hydrolysis was performed by mixing equal volumes (2.0 [mu]l) of 25% ammonium hydroxide and RNA sample (5-10 * 10-6 M) at 60oC. Aliquots of 1 [mu]l were taken out at selected times and dried in a stream of cold air. For these samples it turned out to be important to first dry the digests in a stream of cold air, before 1.5 [mu]l of the matrix solution and 0.7 [mu]l of a suspension of NH4+-loaded cation exchange polymer beads were added.
5 Hahn, C.-S., Strauss, E. G. and Strauss, J. H. (1989) Methods Enzymol., 180, 121-130.
6 Lane, D. J., Pace, B., Olsen, G. J., Stahl, D. A., Sogin, M. L. and Pace, N. R. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,82, 6955-6959.
7 Kramer, F. R. and Mills, D. R. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,75, 5334-5338.
8 Bauer, J. G. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res.,18, 879-884.
9 Parvin, J. D., Smith, F. I. and Palese, P. (1986) DNA, 5, 167-171.
10 Donis-Keller, H., Maxam, A. M. and Gilbert, W. (1977) Nucleic Acids Res., 4, 2527-2537.
11 Frank, R. and Köster, H. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res., 6, 2069-2087.MEDLINE Abstract
12 Li, S., Haces, A., Stupar, L., Gebeyehu, G. and Pless, R. C. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res.,21, 2709-2714.MEDLINE Abstract
13 Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C. and Chait, B. T. (1991) Anal. Chem.,63, 1193A-1202A.
14 Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F. and Whitehouse, C. M. (1983) Science, 246, 64-70.
15 Nordhoff, E., Kirpekar, F. and Roepstorff, P. (1997) Mass Spectrom. Rev., 15, 67-138.
16 Kowalak, J. A., Bruenger, E. and McCloskey, J. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem.,270, 17758-17764.
17 Doktycz, M. J., Hurst, G. B., Habibi-Goudarzi, S., McLuckey, S. A., Tang, K., Chen, C. H., Uziel, M., Jacobson, K. B., Woychik, R. P. and Buchanan, M. V. (1995) Anal. Biochem., 230, 205-214.
18 Little, D. P., Thannhauser, T. W. and McLafferty, F. W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 2318-2322.
19 Nordhoff, E., Ingendoh, A., Cramer, C., Overberg, A., Stahl, B., Karas, M., Hillenkamp, F. and Crain, P. (1992) Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.,6, 771-776. MEDLINE Abstract
20 Simoncsits, A., Brownlee, G. G., Brown, R. S., Rubin, J. R. and Guilley, H. (1977) Nature, 269, 833-836.MEDLINE Abstract
21 Gupta, R. C. and Randerath, K. (1977) Nucleic Acids Res., 4, 1957-1978.
22 Kuchino, Y. and Nishimura, S. (1989) Methods Enzymol., 180, 154-163.MEDLINE Abstract
23 Boguski, M. S., Hieter, P. A. and Levy, C. C. (1980) J. Biol. Chem.,255, 2160-2163.
24 Rojo, M. A., Arias, F. J., Iglesias, R., Ferreras, J. M., Muñoz, R., Escarmis, C., Soriano, F., López-Fando, J., Méndez, E. and Girbés, T. (1994) Planta, 194, 328-338.
25 Donis-Keller, H. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res.,8, 3133-3142.
26 Peattie, D. A. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,76, 1760-1764.
27 Waldmann, R., Gross, H. J. and Krupp, G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res.,15, 7209.MEDLINE Abstract
28 Nordhoff, E., Cramer, R., Karas, M., Hillenkamp, F., Kirpekar, F., Kristiansen, K. and Roepstorff, P. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res.,21, 3347-3357.MEDLINE Abstract
29 Shaler, T. A., Wickham, J. N., Sannes, K. A., Wu, K. J. and Becker, C. H. (1996) Anal. Chem., 68, 576-579.
30 Richards, F. M. and Wyckoff, H. W. (1971) In Boyer, P. D.(ed.) The Enzymes Vol. 4, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 746-806.
31 Heinemann, U. and Saenger, W. (1985) Pure Appl. Chem., 57, 417-422.
32 Ikehara, M., Satoshi, N., Morioka, H., Kim, H. J., Fuchimura, K., Kimura, T., Adiwinata, J., Tanaka, Ohtsuka, E. and Uesugi, S. (1987) Pure Appl. Chem., 59, 965-968.
33 Breslow, R. and Xu, R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 1201-1207.MEDLINE Abstract
34 Hahner, S., Kirpekar, F., Nordhoff, E., Kristiansen, K., Roepstorff, P. and Hillenkamp, F. (1996) Proceedings of th 44th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry, Portland, Oregon, p. 938.
35 Pieles, U., Zürcher, W., Schär, M. and Moser, H. E. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3191-3196.MEDLINE Abstract
36 Nordhoff, E., Hahner, S., Karas, M., Hillenkamp, F., Kirpekar, F., Kristiansen, K. and Roepstorff, P. (1993) Book of Abstracts, 13th Internat. Mass Spectrom. Conf., Budapest, p. 218.
37 Kirpekar, F., Nordhoff, E., Kristiansen, K., Roepstorff, P., Lezius, A., Hahner, S., Karas, M. and Hillenkamp, F. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3866-3870.MEDLINE Abstract
38 Hillenkamp, F. (1997) New Methods in the Study of Molecular Aggregates, Standing, K. G. (ed.), NATO Advanced Research Workshop Series, Kluwer Academic Pubs., in press.
39 Tong, X. and Smith, L. M. (1992) Anal. Chem., 64, 2672-2677.MEDLINE Abstract
40 Limbach, P. A., Crain, P. F. and McCloskey, J. A. (1995) J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 6, 27-39.
41 Overberg, A., Karas, M. and Hillenkamp, F. (1990) Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom., 5, 128.
42 Hultman, T., Stahl, S. and Uhlen, M. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res., 17, 4937-4946.MEDLINE Abstract
43 Broude, N. E., Sano, T., Smith, C. L. and Cantor, C. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 3072-3076.
44 Tang, K., Fu, D., Kötter, S., Cotter, R. J., Cantor, C. R. and Köster, H. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 3126-3131.MEDLINE Abstract
45 Olejnik, J., Krzymanska-Olejnik and Rothschild, K. J. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 361-366.MEDLINE Abstract
46 Hahner, S., Lüdemann, H.-C., Olejnik, J., Krzymanska-Olejnik, E., Rothschild, K. J. and Hillenkamp, F. (1997) 45th Annual Conference on Mass Spectrometry amd Allied Topics, Palm Springs, CA, June 1-5. Proceedings of extended abstracts, to be published.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 251 835 5103; Fax: +49 251 835 5121; Email: hillenk@uni-muenster.de