Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (200K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghersa, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghersa, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 339-346

Footnote

Distamycin prolongs E-selectin expression by interacting with a specific NF- [kappa]B-HMG-I(Y) binding site in the promoter

Distamycin prolongs E-selectin expression by interacting with a specific NF- [kappa]B-HMG-I(Y) binding site in the promoter Paola Ghersa* , James Whelan , Yves Cambet , John F. DeLamarter and Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen

Geneva Biomedical Research Institute, 14, Chemin des Aulx, Case Postale 674, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva , Switzerland

Received September 18, 1996; Revised and Accepted November 13, 1996

ABSTRACT

The E-selectin cell adhesion protein plays a critical role in mediating adherence of leukocytes to endothelium at sites of inflammation. Cytokine-induced E-selectin expression on the surface of endothelial cells is transient; mRNA expression peaks at 3-4 h after induction and returns to basal levels within 24 h. The mechanism for this transcriptional down-modulation is not known. Promoter binding factors responsible for induced gene expression include NF- [kappa] B, which binds at three sites within the E-selectin promoter, and HMG-I(Y), which binds to the A/T-rich core found at the centre of these binding sites. Distamycin is an antibiotic that also binds A/T-rich DNA and inhibits HMG-I(Y) DNA binding. To study the role of HMG-I(Y) in E-selectin expression, we have examined the effect of distamycin on the cytokine-induced E-selectin expression cycle. We found that distamycin prolonged E-selectin expression, both by sustaining mRNA transcription and by extending the transcript's half-life. The distamycin effect on transcription was mediated through one of the three NF- [kappa] B-HMG-I(Y) binding sites (NF- [kappa] BII) within the promoter. This suggests that the NF- [kappa] B-HMG-I(Y) complex interacting at the NF- [kappa] BII site plays a role not only in cytokine induction of E-selectin expression, but also in its down-modulation.

INTRODUCTION

E-Selectin (also known as CD62E and ELAM-1) is a membrane glycoprotein exclusively expressed on the surface of endothelial cells during inflammation in vivo or after cytokine, lipopolysaccharide or phorbol ester induction in vitro ( 1 - 5 ). E-Selectin plays a critical role at inflammation sites in mediating the adhesion to endothelial cells and extravasation of neutrophils and a subset of T lymphocytes. Both up- and down-modulation of this selectin is tightly controlled. Several transcription factors and their cognate DNA binding elements in the E-selectin promoter have been identified that are essential for activation of the E-selectin promoter. NF-[kappa]B binding to the -94/-85 region in the E-selectin promoter is essential but not sufficient for cytokine induction of the gene ( 6 - 9 ). Induction of the E-selectin promoter also requires NF-[kappa]B complexes to bind at positions -126 ( 10 , 11 ) and -116 ( 10 , 12 ). Moreover, E-selectin promoter activation requires members of the ATF family of transcription factors that bind the NF-ELAM1 site at position -157 ( 13 , 14 ) and as yet unidentified protein(s) binding the NF-ELAM-2 site at position -104 ( 13 ). Tissue specificity of the E-selectin gene is associated with CpG methylation of the proximal promoter ( 15 ).

Binding of NF-[kappa]B and ATF factors to their promoter sites is enhanced by a member of the high mobility group family of proteins, HMG-I(Y) ( 11 - 14 ). High mobility group proteins are non-histone chromosomal proteins that have been shown to bind the minor groove of A/T-rich regions of double-stranded DNA in vitro ( 16 ). HMG-I(Y) also plays an important role in virus-mediated induction of the [beta]-IFN gene through its interaction with NF-[kappa]B ( 17 , 18 ).

Several compounds (e.g. distamycin, berenil, bis-benzamidine and netropsin) have been described that compete with HMG-I(Y) for binding in the minor groove of A/T-rich DNA regions ( 19 - 21 ). As HMG-I(Y) binds to the E-selectin promoter and plays a role in its activation, we decided to analyse the effect of these specific competitors of HMG-I(Y) binding on activation of the E-selectin promoter by cytokine treatment of endothelial cells. In contrast to our expectation of reduced or blocked E-selectin expression, we found that distamycin significantly prolonged E-selectin expression induced by both IL-1[beta] and TNF-[alpha]. We have studied the mechanism of this distamycin effect to learn more about the role of HMG-I(Y) in the regulation of E-selectin transcription. We show that the NF-[kappa]BII element in the E-selectin promoter is responsible for the distamycin effect and is likely to play a role in the physiological down-modulation of E-selectin gene expression, possibly through DNA-bending.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

Human endothelial cells (HUVECs) were isolated from human umbilical cords by collagenase treatment and grown as previously described ( 22 ). All experiments were performed using HUVECs at passages 3-5.

Flow cytometry determination of E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1

HUVECs were grown to confluence in 5 cm Petri dishes, pre-treated for different times with distamycin (10 [mu]M) and induced for 4 h with 10 U/ml IL-1 in complete Clonetics medium containing 2% foetal calf serum. Cells were removed with the help of a rubber policeman in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 1 mM EDTA pre-warmed at 37oC. Cells were collected by spinning for 5 min at 1000 r.p.m. at 4oC and re-suspended in PBS containing 10 mg/ml BSA and 0.1 mg/ml NaN 3 . Cells (4 * 10 5 ) were incubated for 30 min at 4oC in the presence of the first monoclonal antibody, washed and incubated for a further 15 min at 4oC in the presence of a second antibody (anti-mouse-IgG conjugated to FITC). The cells were washed in PBS, BSA and submitted to FACS analysis. The MFI values from three different experiments are expressed as a percentage of the maximal value obtained with 10 U/ml IL-1.

Preparation of RNA and Northern blot analysis

Total RNA was isolated from confluent HUVECs using the guanidinium isothiocyanate/CsCl procedure ( 23 ). Total RNA (20 [mu]g/lane) was fractionated on a 1% agarose gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde, blotted onto nylon membrane filters (GeneScreen Plus; NEN) and hybridized to nick-translated E-selectin-1, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 or human [beta]-actin 32 P-labelled cDNA probes ( 24 ). Filters were washed twice for 30 min at 37oC in 2* SSC, 0.1% SDS and for 15 min at 55oC in 0.2* SSC, 0.1% SDS and then exposed for different times to Kodak XAR films at -80oC. Results were visualized by autoradiography and quantified using an Ambis (San Diego, CA) radioactivity scanner.

Nuclear run-on transcription assays

HUVECs which had been left untreated or pre-treated for 24 h with distamycin (10 [mu]M) were incubated with human IL-1[beta] (10 U/ml) in the presence or absence of distamycin (10 [mu]M) and nuclei were isolated after 1, 6 or 24 h. Nuclear run-on assays were performed as previously described ( 22 ) starting with 3 * 10 7 cells/treatment. For each assay, nuclei were re-suspended in 300 [mu]l transcription buffer containing 250 [mu]Ci [[alpha]- 32 P]UTP and incubated for 20 min at 30oC. The radiolabelled RNA was purified using the guanidinium isothiocyanate/CsCl procedure ( 23 ) and equal amounts of c.p.m. were used for hybridization to nitrocellulose filters that contained alkali-denatured target cDNA. The filters were prepared by slot blotting of 7.5 [mu]g target DNA followed by baking for 2 h in vacuo at 80oC. The DNAs used were plasmids pCDM8 and pELAM-1 (plasmid pCDM8 containing E-selectin cDNA; 22 ). Results were visualized by autoradiography and quantified by densitometric scanning of the autoradiograms.

Plasmid constructs

The plasmid constructs were made by inserting different E-selectin promoter regions into the Eco RI site of a pCAT-promoter plasmid (Promega) containing the enhancerless SV40 promoter. The plasmid used (as shown in Fig. 7 ) contained; (i) the -383 promoter region with the NF-[kappa]BI and NF-[kappa]BII wild-type elements; (ii) the NF-[kappa]BI wild-type element and a mutated NF-[kappa]BII element; (iii) a mutated NF-[kappa]BI and a NF-[kappa]BII wild-type element, as described earlier ( 14 ).

DNA transfection and CAT analysis

Transfection of plasmid DNA into HUVECs was carried out using the DEAE-Dextran method as described ( 25 ). HUVECs were pre-treated for 24 h with distamycin, transfected and treated with distamycin alone or in combination with IL-1[beta] (40 U/ml). After 24 h treatment, the cells were collected by scraping and cellular extracts were used for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) assays essentially as described ( 26 ). CAT enzymatic activity was quantified using an Ambis (San Diego, CA) radioactivity scanner.

DNase I footprinting

For DNase I footprinting a PCR-generated DNA fragment that spanned part of the E-selectin promoter (-162 to -71) and contained the three NF-[kappa]B sites was used: GTA ACA CAG AGT TTC TGA CAT CAT TGT AAT TTT AAG CAT CGT G GA TAT TCC C GG GAA AGT T TT TGG ATG CCA TTG GGG ATT TCC TCT TTA CTG GAT GTG GAA CC. The 5' primer was 5'-end-labelled with [[gamma]- 32 P]ATP prior to the PCR reaction ( 27 ). The template utilized for PCR was a basic pCAT-Promega vector containing the -383 region of the E-selectin promoter.

The in vitro DNase I assay protocol was performed by incubating this fragment for 10 min at room temperature with 1.5 U/ml DNase I, after pre-incubation for 1 h on ice in the absence or presence of distamycin at various concentrations. Digested products were analysed on 8% polyacrylamide (19:1 acrylamide/bis-acrylamide), 50% urea, 0.5* TBE sequencing gels.

DNA bending analysis

Subcloning of the NF-[kappa]BI element into pBEND2 was described previously ( 28 ). In order to insert the NF-[kappa]BII element, oligonucleotides CTA GCC CGG GAA TAT CCA CGA TG and TCG ACA TCG TGG ATA TTC CCG GG were phosphorylated, annealed and cloned into the Xba I- Sal I sites of pBEND2 using standard procedures ( 29 ). PBEND2 ( 30 ) was a kind gift of Dr S.Adhya. The resulting construct was sequenced to verify that it contained a single insert. The polylinkers plus insert from both constructs were PCR amplified using oligonucleotides PCR-BEND2a and PCR-BEND2b ( 28 ). The resulting fragments were treated with phenol, cut separately with the different restriction enzymes, treated with phosphatase, purified from a MetaPhor agarose (FMC BioProducts) gel, end-labelled using [[gamma]- 32 P]ATP and purified again on a 12% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The total length of each of the probes was 139 bp. The probes were incubated for 20 min on ice in 25 [mu]l BCA buffer ( 13 , 27 , 31 ) and 3 [mu]g poly(dI[middot]dC) (Pharmacia) with or without 0.1 mM distamycin. Migration was at room temperature in a 6.5% acrylamide, 0.5* TBE gel (1.5 mm thick, 16 * 18 cm; Hoefer Scientific). The gel was run at 10 mA for 1.5 times the time taken for the bromophenol blue marker to run off the gel.

RESULTS

Distamycin prolongs cytokine-induced E-selectin expression in endothelial cells

E-Selectin expression on the surface of endothelial cells peaks 4-5 h after cytokine induction and both protein and mRNA return to their basal levels within 24 h. This drop in E-selectin mRNA transcription occurs even in the continuous presence of cytokine (Fig. 1 A; 1 , 6 ) and even though high levels of NF-[kappa]B persist up to 48 h post-induction ( 32 ). To study the role of HMG-I(Y) in this cytokine-induced, transient E-selectin expression, we treated HUVECs with IL-1 in conjunction with distamycin. Since distamycin is capable of inhibiting HMG-I(Y) binding to DNA ( 19 ), we anticipated an inhibition of E-selectin expression. In contrast, we observed that when E-selectin expression was induced by IL-1 in the presence of distamycin, the high level of E-selectin protein measured by flow cytometry (FACS) was significantly prolonged (Fig. 1 A). At 24 h post-IL-1 induction, distamycin maintained E-selectin expression at ~70-80% of the maximal level observed at 4 h post-induction. At 96 h, the level of E-selectin expression in IL-1 plus distamycin-treated cells had only fallen to ~50% of the maximum level.


Figure 1 . Effect of distamycin on ( A ) E-selectin and ( B ) VCAM-1 cell surface expression. FACS analysis of E-selectin and VCAM, quantified as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Endothelial cells were continuously treated with IL-1[beta] (10 U/ml; -), with IL-1 plus distamycin (10 [mu]M; [circle]) or with distamycin alone (s). Values represent an average of three experiments and are expressed as a percentage of the maximal value obtained by induction with IL-1 alone.

The prolongation of E-selectin protein expression in the presence of distamycin is reflected in a similar persistence of E-selectin mRNA, as measured by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2 ). The level of E-selectin mRNA 24 and 48 h after the onset of IL-1 induction and in the presence of distamycin was close to that observed at 3 or 6 h following IL-1 induction alone (Fig. 2 A, lanes 11 and 13 versus 2 and 4, and Fig. 2 B). To test if the continuous presence of distamycin is required for sustained E-selectin expression, we removed the compound 24 h after induction with IL-1 plus distamycin. Removal of distamycin by rinsing the cells resulted in a decrease in E-selectin mRNA accumulation during the following 24 h (Fig. 3 , lane 6). We found that distamycin did not increase the peak level of E-selectin expression induced after 4 h IL-1 treatment (Figs 1 A and 2 A). Moreover, distamycin alone induced neither E-selectin protein nor mRNA expression (Figs 1 A and 2 A). Cell viability was not affected by distamycin treatment as measured in a proliferation assay (data not shown). Taken together, our results suggest that distamycin is capable of inhibiting the down-regulation of E-selectin expression.


Figure 2 . Effect of distamycin on IL-1-induced E-selectin mRNA accumulation. ( A ) HUVECs were left untreated (lane 1) or incubated for 3, 6, 9, 16, 24 or 48 h with IL-1 alone (10 U/ml; lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12), with IL-1 plus distamycin (10 [mu]M; lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13) or with distamycin alone for 24 or 48 h (lanes 14 and 15). Total RNA was subjected to Northern blot analysis and hybridized with E-selectin (top panel), VCAM-1 (middle panel) or actin (lower panel) probes. ( B ) Graphic representation of the radioactivity scanned on the blot shown in the top panel of (A), expressed as a fraction of the actin signal. ( C ) The same for the middle panel in (A).


Figure 3 . Reversibility of the distamycin effect. Cells were left untreated (lane 1) or treated for 3 (lanes 2 and 3) or 24 h (lanes 4 and 5) with IL-1 (10 [mu]M) in the absence (lanes 2 and 4) or presence (lanes 3 and 5) of distamycin (10 [mu]M). After 24 h treatment with IL-1 and distamycin cells were washed and incubated for a further 24 h in the presence of IL-1, but in the absence of distamycin (lane 6). Total RNA was subjected to Northern blot analysis as in Figure 2.

To determine whether the distamycin-induced prolongation of E-selectin expression is specific or is also observed with other compounds that bind A/T-rich regions of DNA, we also tested the effect of bis-benzimide, berenil and netropsin on E-selectin expression following IL-1 induction. Unlike distamycin, these compounds did not affect IL-1-induced E-selectin mRNA or protein expression as determined by Northern blot (Fig. 4 ) or FACS analysis (data not shown). Thus, distamycin appears to differ in its activity on the E-selectin promoter from other compounds that bind A/T-rich regions of DNA.


Figure 4 . Effect of different A/T-rich DNA binding compounds on E-selectin mRNA induction. Cells were left untreated (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10 and 13), treated for 3 or 24 h with IL-1 (lanes 2 and 3) or with IL-1 plus distamycin (lanes 5 and 6), berenil (lanes 8 and 9), bis-benzamidine (lanes 11 and 12) or netropsin (lanes 14 and 15). All these compounds were used at 10 [mu]M final concentration. RNA was blotted and hybridized to E-selectin and actin probes. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic rRNAs were used as size markers.

To analyse whether the maintenance of expression by distamycin is specific to E-selectin, we examined the effect of distamycin on another adhesion protein, VCAM-1. Like E-selectin, VCAM-1 is transiently expressed on endothelial cells following cytokine induction. The expression of VCAM-1 is maximal 6-8 h following IL-1 induction ( 33 - 36 ). We did not observe strongly increased VCAM-1 expression on distamycin treatment as observed by FACS (Fig. 1 B) or by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2 ), similarly to distamycin's lack of effect on actin. These results suggest that the effect of distamycin in prolonging E-selectin gene expression is specific and not a general effect on transcription of proteins transiently expressed by endothelial cells.

Distamycin's mode of action involves both enhanced E-selectin gene transcription and increased E-selectin mRNA stability

We wished to evaluate whether an enhanced transcription initiation rate or increased mRNA stability are part of the mechanism by which distamycin prolongs E-selectin expression. To examine mRNA stability we measured the E-selectin mRNA half-life in the presence and absence of distamycin following IL-1 treatment. The transcript's half-life was determined by monitoring the level of E-selectin mRNA at different times following treatment of cells with actinomycin D, an inhibitor of ongoing transcription. A stabilization of E-selectin mRNA was seen when cells were induced by cytokine in the presence of distamycin (Fig. 5 A). To determine a distamycin effect on the rate of E-selectin gene transcription, we performed transcriptional run-on analysis. In nuclei purified from IL-1-induced endothelial cells pre-treated with distamycin, ongoing E-selectin transcription was assayed at different times following IL-1 induction. Transcription of the E-selectin gene was maintained longer following distamycin treatment (Fig. 5 B and C, lanes 4, 6 and 8 versus 3, 5 and 7). We conclude that the prolonged E-selectin expression caused by distamycin results both from mRNA stabilization and prolonged E-selectin transcription.


Figure 5 . E-selectin mRNA half-life and run-on analysis. ( A ) E-Selectin mRNA transcription was induced for 2 h with IL-1 in the presence or absence of distamycin (10 [mu]M) and further RNA synthesis was blocked by actinomycin D (10 [mu]g/ml). E-Selectin and actin mRNA decay was followed by Northern blot analysis. The figure represents radioactivity in the different bands detected by an Ambis radioactivity scanner (duplicate samples). The E-selectin mRNA signal is expressed as a fraction of actin mRNA. ( B ) Run-on assay of E-selectin gene transcription. Nuclei were isolated from HUVECs untreated (lane 1) or pre-treated for 24 h with distamycin and then treated for 1, 6, 16 or 24 h with IL-1 (10 U/ml), in the absence (lanes 1, 3, 5 and 7) or presence (lanes 2, 4, 6 and 8) of distamycin (10 [mu]M). The slot blot was probed with E-selectin cDNA or with control probe (pCDM8) and exposed at -80oC for 1 week. ( C ) A graphic quantification of the data shown in (B).

Distamycin binds the E-selectin promoter NF- [kappa] BII site

To analyse the region(s) in the E-selectin promoter to which distamycin binds, we performed in vitro DNase I footprinting. We used a fragment containing the region of the E-selectin promoter previously defined as being sufficient to mediate cytokine induction (positions -162 to -71). In the presence of distamycin, the region corresponding to the NF-[kappa]BII site (-117 to -108) was protected (Fig. 6 ). In contrast, neither the NF-[kappa]BI (-84 to -860) nor the NF-[kappa]BIII (-117 to -118) site was strongly protected in the presence of distamycin. These results suggest that the effect of distamycin on E-selectin gene expression is specifically mediated through the NF-[kappa]BII site.


Figure 6 . DNase I footprinting of the minimal E-selectin promoter containing the three NF-[kappa]B sites. 5'- 32 P-Labelled, double-stranded DNA spanning the E-selectin promoter region was pre-incubated for 1 h in the absence (lane 2) or presence of distamycin at 0.1 (lane 3) or 10 [mu]M (lane 4). Partial DNase I digestion (1.5 U/ml) was for 10 min at room temperature. A B C


Figure 7 . Transcriptional activity of minimal E-selectin promoter constructs mutated in NF-[kappa]B sites. Activity of CAT reporter constructs driven by ( A ) the -383 bp wild-type E-selectin promoter, ( B ) a construct mutated at the NF-[kappa]BI site and ( C ) a construct mutated at the NF-[kappa]BII site. Transiently transfected endothelial cells were incubated with IL-1 (40 U/ml), distamycin (D; 10 [mu]M) or both and the 14C radioactivity in acetylated chromatography spots measured (see Materials and Methods).

Distamycin acts through the proximal E-selectin promoter elements

We also attempted to narrow down the E-selectin promoter element(s) involved in distamycin's up-regulation in a functional assay. E-Selectin promoter-CAT reporter constructs in which specific NF-[kappa]B sites had been mutated were tested in transient transfection assays. As found previously ( 6 ), the 383 bp proximal E-selectin promoter sequence was sufficient to mediate IL-1 induction of a fused reporter gene (Fig. 7 A). Using the same construct, we also found that induction was greatly enhanced when cells had been treated with IL-1 in the presence of distamycin (Fig. 7 A). In this assay system, distamycin alone was only able to weakly activate the E-selectin promoter. Thus, the distamycin effect on endothelial cell expression of E-selectin is mediated by a restricted region of the E-selectin promoter. When the NF-[kappa]BI site was mutated, IL-1 induced very weak expression of the E-selectin promoter and distamycin significantly enhanced this IL-1 induction (Fig. 7 B). This result suggests that the distamycin effect is not mediated by the NF-[kappa]BI site. Finally, a mutation in the NF-[kappa]BII site resulted in a near complete loss of IL-1 induction (Fig. 7 C) and in a complete loss of any distamycin effect. These data indicate that the NF-[kappa]BII site plays a critical role in E-selectin mRNA transcription; in contrast to the NF-[kappa]BI site, its loss cannot be functionally compensated for by addition of distamycin. These findings are consistent with the role we propose for NF-[kappa]BII as the site of distamycin action.

Distamycin alters the geometry of the NF- [kappa] BII site

A possible mode of action for distamycin could be the displacement of a transcriptional repressor or to increase the binding of a trans -activator to the E-selectin promoter. However, band shift experiments with radiolabelled oligonucleotides carrying NF-[kappa]BI or NF-[kappa]BII sites and nuclear extracts prepared from cells treated with interleukin or interleukin plus distamycin failed to show a difference in protein binding (data not shown). We therefore hypothesize that distamycin has a subtler effect on the E-selectin promoter. Many HMG-like proteins are known to bend the DNA to which they bind ( 37 , 38 ), whereas binding of distamycin results in a `straightening out' or `unbending' of DNA ( 39 - 41 ). We have previously shown that several transcription factors known to activate the E-selectin promoter also induce DNA bending when bound to their E-selectin promoter sites. Moreover, we have shown that intrinsically bent DNA sequences can functionally replace factor binding to some of the crucial elements that activate the E-selectin promoter ( 28 ). A possibility for distamycin's mode of action is that it alters the geometry of the E-selectin promoter. We therefore examined how distamycin affects bending of the E-selectin NF-[kappa]BI and NF-[kappa]BII sites by use of a technique called phasing analysis ( 30 ). For this assay, the NF-[kappa]B-containing DNA elements were cloned into a plasmid between two direct repeats carrying multiple restriction sites (Fig. 8 A). The elements were excised from the vector using one of the set of restriction enzymes that cut in the repeats. The fragments were radioactively labelled, incubated with distamycin and migrated in a polyacrylamide gel. As all fragments have near identical molecular weights and electrostatic charge, altered migration patterns are indicative of differences in conformation. The results in Figure 8 B show migration of the NF-[kappa]BI and NF-[kappa]BII DNA fragments incubated in the presence or absence of distamycin. As judged by its migration, insertion of the NF-[kappa]BII element resulted in a high degree of distortion of the DNA, but addition of distamycin caused all fragments to run with the same mobility (Fig. 8 B, right panel). In contrast, the NF-[kappa]BI element caused considerably less distortion (Fig. 8 B, left panels), both in the absence and presence of distamycin.


Figure 8 . Distamycin bends DNA at the NF-[kappa]BII site. ( A ) Map of the position of the NF-[kappa]BI or NF-[kappa]BII element (box) cloned into pBend2 and probes generated from this vector. ( B ) Migration of radiolabelled fragments excised from the constructs in a polyacrylamide gel in the presence or absence of 0.1 [mu]M distamycin. As Sma I cuts within the NF-[kappa]BII element, this enzyme could not be used for the right panel. The lower band in the Xho I lanes (right panels) is a contaminating fragment that does not contain an NF-[kappa]B site. ( C ) Schematic representation of (B). The migration of the different bands is plotted. The names of the restriction enzymes are abbreviated [order as in (B)].

We conclude that the NF-[kappa]BII site is subject to a significant conformation change when bound by distamycin, unlike the relatively constant NF-[kappa]BI site.

DISCUSSION

We have recently shown ( 11 ) that HMG-I(Y) is involved in the regulation of E-selectin gene expression by enhancing NF-[kappa]B binding to three regions in the proximal promoter. From the known properties of distamycin to bind the minor groove of A/T-rich DNA regions and to block HMG-I(Y) binding to DNA, we hypothesized that this compound would inhibit the induction of E-selectin expression. Contrary to our expectation, distamycin significantly extended the duration of maximal E-selectin expression. We show here that distamycin treatment both prolongs the duration of E-selectin transcription and stabilizes E-selectin mRNA. The stabilization of E-selectin mRNA by distamycin is puzzling, since distamycin is not known to bind RNA. A possibility is that an E-selectin mRNA degradation pathway exists that itself depends on transcription and translation. More evidence for such a pathway comes from our earlier finding ( 22 ) that the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide also increases the E-selectin mRNA half-life. It would be of interest to investigate distamycin's effect on other unstable mRNAs.

Our run-on results support distamycin extending E-selectin maximal expression by acting through the protein complex binding at the NF-[kappa]BII element on the promoter. The three findings consistent with this mechanism are: (i) DNase I protection footprinting carried out in the presence of distamycin shows that only the NF-[kappa]BII (-126) site is protected from DNase digestion; (ii) mutation of NF-[kappa]B sites shows that NF-[kappa]BI is dispensable for a functional distamycin response, whereas deletion of the NF-[kappa]BII site results in no response at all; (iii) distamycin reduces bending on the NF-[kappa]BII site, but not the NF-[kappa]BI site.

Our results suggest that distamycin treatment mediates its effect predominantly (or only) through one site (NF-[kappa]BII) of the E-selectin promoter. This observation suggests that the complex that binds site II has a distinct role from those binding the other two sites, possibly because of a different protein composition ( 11 , 32 ). Furthermore, the sequence of the NF-[kappa]BII site, unlike the NF-[kappa]BI site, differs from the canonical NF-[kappa]B binding sequence consensus ( 42 , 43 ). The fact that the NF-[kappa]BII element, unlike the NF-[kappa]BI site, is completely conserved between mouse and man ( 44 ) is another indication of a special role for this element. It was found recently that binding of different NF-[kappa]B complexes is determined by the precise sequence of the NF-[kappa]B binding site within the promoter ( 45 ). The sequence of the NF-[kappa]BII site differs from the consensus sequence at the seventh nucleotide, where an adenine instead of a pyrimidine residue (consensus sequence) is found ( 45 ). This sequence difference may allow a different NF-[kappa]B complex to bind the site, explaining the preferential binding of distamycin and the subsequent effect on E-selectin expression.

HMG-I(Y) has been described as a specific co-activator of NF-[kappa]B ( 45 ). Our results may be explained by a dual role of the complex that binds the NF-[kappa]BII site of the E-selectin promoter. A number of examples exist where NF-[kappa]B binding sites play a role in the repression of gene expression ( 46 - 49 ). In one example Dorsal, a Drosophila rel-family protein, not only activates but also represses transcription ( 50 ). Recently, a Drosophila HMG1-like protein (DSP-1) has been identified that converts Dorsal and NF-[kappa]B from activators into transcriptional repressors ( 51 ). Thus, HMG-like proteins can determine whether NF-[kappa]B functions as an activator or repressor of transcription, perhaps by local DNA (un)bending. A mammalian homologue of DSP-1 (as yet unidentified) may be involved in the down-regulation of E-selectin expression by binding at or close to the NF-[kappa]BII site. Distamycin may prolong E-selectin expression by inhibiting the binding of such a repressor.

An alternative, structure-based hypothesis may explain the effect of distamycin on E-selectin expression. HMG-I(Y) has been thought of as an architectural component of the NF-[kappa]B-promoter complex. The DNA binding domain of HMG-I(Y) has a predicted planar crescent shape, similar to distamycin ( 52 ). Thus distamycin may replace HMG-I(Y) structurally and functionally in the site II complex when it is normally lost in down-regulation of the promoter, perhaps after phosphorylation. The continuous presence of distamycin would allow transcription; removal would stop transcription. These predictions are consistent with our observations that removal of distamycin results in rapid down-regulation of E-selectin expression. Our finding that other DNA binding compounds not well known to bend DNA did not affect E-selectin transcription (Fig. 4 ) suggests that distamycin's DNA bending capacity plays a role in this transcriptional on/off switch. It was recently found that distamycin also binds NF-[kappa]B elements in the HIV promoter ( 53 ), but in this case transcriptional effects were not explored.

This study provides evidence for the importance of the NF-[kappa]BII site of the promoter in down-regulation of E-selectin expression and suggests HMG-I(Y) DNA bending as a modulator of NF-[kappa]B function. Identifying the components of the NF-[kappa]BII binding complex and how they change with time following cytokine induction of the promoter will be important. Clarifying the precise means by which the E-selectin promoter is down-regulated will also add significant insight into the many other promoters whose regulation involves NF-[kappa]B-like complexes and why and how these evoke different transcriptional responses.

REFERENCES

1 Bevilacqua,M.P., Stengelin,S., Gimbrone,M.A.,Jr and Seed,B. (1989) Science, 243, 1160-1165. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Bevilacqua,M.P. (1993) Annu. Rev. Immunol., 11, 767-804. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Pober,J.S. and Cotran,R.S. (1990) Physiol. Rev., 70, 427-451. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Gerritsen,M.E. and Bloor,C.M. (1993) FASEB J., 7, 523-532. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Ross,R. (1993) Nature, 362, 801-809. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Whelan,J., Ghersa,P., Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Gray,J., Chandra,G., Talabot,F. and DeLamarter,J. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 2645-2653. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Hession,C., Osborn,L., Goff,D., Chi-Rosso,G., Vassallo,C., Pasek,M., Pittack,C., Tizard,R., Goelz,S., McCarthy,K., Hopple,S. and Lobb,R. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 1673-1677. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Collins,T. (1992) J. Vasc. Surg., 15, 923-924. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Collins,T., Williams,A., Johnston,G.I., Kim,J., Eddy,R., Shows,T., Gimbrone,M.A.,Jr and Bevilacqua,M.P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem., 266, 2466-2473. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Schindler,U. and Baichwal,V.R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 5820-5831. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Lewis,H., Kaszubska,W., DeLamarter,J.F. and Whelan,J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 5701-5709. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Whitley,M.Z., Thanos,D., Read,M.A., Maniatis,T. and Collins,T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 6464-6475. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Whelan,J., Pescini,R., Becker Andre,M., Schenk,A.M. and DeLamarter,J.F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 22385-22391. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Kaszubska,W., Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Ghersa,P., de Raemy-Schenk,A.-M., Chen,B.P.C., Hai,T., DeLamarter,J.F. and Whelan,J. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7180-7190. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Smith,G.M., Whelan,J., Pescini,R., Ghersa,P., DeLamarter,J.F. and Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 194, 215-221. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Reeves,R. and Nissen,M.S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265, 8573-8582. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Du,W. and Maniatis,T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 2150-2154. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Du,W. and Maniatis,T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 11318-11322. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Radic,M.Z., Saghbini,M., Elton,T.S., Reeves,R. and Hamkalo,B.A. (1992) Chromosoma, 101, 602-608. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Chiang,S.Y., Welch,J., R.F. and Beerman,T.A. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 7033-7040. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Broggini,M., Erba,E., Ponti,M., Ballinari,D., Geroni,C., Spreafico,F. and D'Incalci,M. (1991) Cancer Res., 51, 199-204. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Ghersa,P., van Huijsduijnen,R.H., Whelan,J. and DeLamarter,J.F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 19226-19232. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Chirgwin,M., Pryzabyla,A.E., MacDonald,R.J. and Rutter,W.J. (1979) Biochemistry, 18, 5294-5299.

24 Ausubel,F.M., Brent,R., Kingston,R.E., Moore,D.D. and Seidman,J.G. (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Greene Publishing and Wiley Interscience, New York, NY.

25 Cullen,B.R. (1987) Methods Enzymol., 152, 692-693.

26 Gorman,C.M., Moffat,L.F. and Howard,B.H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol., 2, 1044-1051. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R.A.M. (1992) BioTechniques, 12, 830-832.

28 Meacock,S., Pescini,R., DeLamarter,J. and Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 31756-31762. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

30 Kim,J., Zwieb,C. and Adhya,S. (1989) Gene, 85, 15-23. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Li,X.-Y., Black,D., Matthes,H., Benoist,C. and Mathis,D. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 3119-3127.

32 Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Pescini,R. and DeLamarter,J.F. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3711-3717. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Swerlick,R.A., Lee,K.H., Li,L.-J., Sepp,N.T., Caughman,S.W. and Lawley,T.J. (1992) J. Immunol., 149, 698-705. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Neish,A.S., Williams,A.J., Palmer,H.J., Whitley,M.Z. and Collins,T. (1992) J. Exp. Med., 176, 1583-1593. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Iademarco,M.F., McQuillan,J.J. and Dean,D.C. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 3943-3947. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Iademarco,M.F., McQuillan,J.J., Rosen,G.D. and Dean,D.C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 16323-16329. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Grosschedl,R., Giese,K. and Pagel,J. (1994) Trends Genet., 10, 94-100. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Fisher,R.P., Lisowsky,T., Parisi,M.A. and Clayton,D.A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 3358-3367. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Kim,J., Klooster,S. and Shapiro,D.J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 1282-1288. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Korb,J., Stokrova,J., Riman,J. and Sulova,A. (1993) Acta Virol., 37, 343-359. MEDLINE Abstract

41 Lavigne,M., Herbert,M., Kolb,A. and Buc,H. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 224, 293-306. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Collins,T., Read,M.A., Neish,A.S., Whitley,M.Z., Thanos,D. and Maniatis,T. (1995) FASEB J., 9, 899-909. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Grilli,M., Chiu,J.S. and Lenardo,M.J. (1993) Int. Rev. Cytol., 143, 1-62. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Becker-André,M., Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R., Losberger,C., Whelan,J. and DeLamarter,J. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem., 206, 401-411.

45 Thanos,D. and Maniatis,T. (1995) Cell, 80, 529-232. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Brown,A., Linhoff,M.W., Stein,B., Wright,K.L., Baldwin,A.S., Basta,P.V. and Ting,P.Y. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 2926-2935. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Liptay,S., Schmid,R.M., Nabel,E.G. and Nabel,G.J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 7695-7703. MEDLINE Abstract

48 Oliveira,I.C., Mukaida,N., Matsushima,K. and Vilcek,J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 5300-5308. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Supakar,P.C., Jung,M.H., Song,C.S., Chatterjee,B. and Roy,A.K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 837-842. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Ip,T. (1995) Curr. Biol., 5, 1-3.

51 Lehming,N., Thanos,D., Brickman,J.T., Ma,J., Maniatis,T. and Ptashne,M. (1994) Nature, 371, 175-179. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Reeves,R. (1992) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 4, 413-423. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Feriotto,G., Mischiati,C., Bianchi,N., Passadore,M. and Gambari,R. (1995) Eur. J. Pharmacol., 290, 85-93 MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +41 22 706 97 38; Fax: +41 22 794 69 65; Email: pfg8091@ggr.co.uk
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C Amirand, A Viari, J. Ballini, H Rezaei, N Beaujean, D Jullien, E Kas, and P Debey
Three distinct sub-nuclear populations of HMG-I protein of different properties revealed by co-localization image analysis
J. Cell Sci., January 12, 1998; 111(23): 3551 - 3561.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (200K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghersa, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghersa, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?