Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (38K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ragnhildstveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quivy, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ragnhildstveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quivy, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 453-454

Footnote

Solid phase technology improves coupled gel shift/ footprinting analysis

Solid phase technology improves coupled gel shift/ footprinting analysis Erlend Ragnhildstveit , Anders Fjose , Peter B. Becker 1 and Jean-Pierre Quivy 1, *

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Aarstadv, 19 N-5009 Bergen , Norway and 1 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Gene Expression Programme, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117 Heidelberg , Germany

Received July 12, 1996; Revised and Accepted November 11, 1996

ABSTRACT

For the analysis of protein-DNA interactions by coupled gel-shift/footprinting, DNA fragments need to be extracted from polyacrylamide gels and subsequently separated on high resolution gels. Due to impurities in the extracted DNA, single nucleotide resolution is frequently not achieved. We now describe an improved experimental strategy that employs transient coupling of DNA fragments to a solid support in order to extract DNA of high purity quantitatively, rapidly and reliably. As an example, we describe the application of our protocol to the `in-gel footprinting' by copper phenanthroline. The method should also find application to the chemical interference assays.

Sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions are conveniently analysed by either electromobility shift assays (EMSA) or `footprinting' assays. The former technique detects protein-DNA complexes through their slower migration as compared with free DNA during electrophoresis in a native gel. It is able to detect protein binding under conditions of DNA excess and yields a rough estimate of the mass and/or conformation of the protein-DNA complexes. The latter technique is based on the fact that tight DNA-binding proteins protect their target sequences from nuclease digestion or chemical modification. It requires that all DNA molecules in a reaction are bound by protein (i.e. protein excess) and enables the mapping of binding sites with single nucleotide resolution. Protocols that combine EMSA and the footprinting assay yield maximal information and are the most suitable for analysis of complex protein mixtures. In the simplest case, protein-DNA complexes are treated with nucleases (or chemicals) before separation on a native gels. Nicked DNA from individual complexes is purified and then analysed on high resolution sequencing gels. This protocol will yield footprint data also if the target protein is only present in subsaturating amounts, since homogeneous material is recovered from each band in the native gel. In a modification of this assay, protein-DNA complexes are first separated from each other and from free DNA on a native gel and the footprinting reaction is then performed in the gel ( 1 ).

The crucial step common to these protocols, as well as to the related `interference' assays ( 2 ), is the isolation of the nicked or modified target DNA from the native gel, which is sufficiently pure for optimal single nucleotide resolution on sequencing gels. Trivial as it may seem, the failure to obtain DNA of a high enough purity is frequently the reason for unsatisfactory results. Current procedures-such as multiple successive organic extractions and precipitations, the transfer of DNA onto NA-45 membrane by blotting, or electrophoresis followed by high salt elution-suffer from low recoveries, tricky hands-on steps or variability.

We describe a method for rapid and efficient purification of DNA from bandshift gels yielding DNA of the highest purity for sequence gel analysis. The strategy, which avoids organic extractions and precipitations, is derived from `solid phase footprinting' ( 3 ). A DNA fragment, labelled with 32 P on one 5'-end and carrying a biotin on the other, is used for the EMSA. The region of the gel containing the DNA of interest is excised from the gel. The DNA is then eluted in the presence of proteinase K and immediately immobilised onto streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads therefore selecting for double-stranded DNA (biotin and 32 P label). Successive washes of the immobilised DNA yield a sample with unmatched purity. Denaturation upon addition of formamide loading buffer to the DNA beads and release the labelled DNA fragments for separation on a sequencing gel.

The method is applied to `in-gel footprinting' by copper phenanthroline (OP-Cu) ( 1 ). Chemical cleavage of DNA by OP-Cu is achieved by the binding of the 1,10 phenanthroline cuprous complex to the minor groove of the DNA. Oxidation of the complex creates a highly reactive intermediate that initiates the cleavage of the phosphodiester backbone in its vicinity. Protein-DNA interactions, as well as local distortions of the DNA structure, can be visualised as protections from chemical cleavage or modulations of reactivity respectively ( 1 ). The small size of the attacking chemicals improves the resolution of the footprint, when compared to the use of bulky enzymatic nucleases, which are sterically hindered to cleave close to the bound protein. The fact that the DNA cleavage reagents diffuse uniformly, efficiently and rapidly through a gel matrix leads to in-gel applications ( 1 ).

A 168 bp fragment containing HSE 1 and HSE 2 of the hsp70 promoter ( 4 ) was generated by PCR using one biotinylated and one radioactively labelled primer ( 3 ). The fragment was gel-purified and concentrated by successive isobutanol extractions. Standard binding reaction ( 3 ) containing ~10 6 c.p.m. target fragment, 1 [mu]g poly(dI[middot]dC), 2 [mu]g BSA and increasing amounts of recombinant Drosophila HSF was set up and the resulting protein-DNA complexes were separated on a 1 mm thick 4% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5* TBE. The gel was subjected to Op-Cu treatment at room temperature exactly as described ( 1 ). Briefly, after the electrophoresis, the gel was immersed in a glass tray containing 200 ml 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8. The OP-Cu complex solution (obtained by mixing 1 ml 40 mM ethanolic solution of 1,10-phenanthroline monohydrate, 1 ml 9 mM CuSO 4 and 18 ml water) was added and the gel was slowly agitated for 5 min to allow even diffusion of the chemical throughout the gel. The cleaving reaction was initiated by adding 20 ml 58 mM mercaptopropionic acid and mixed on a shaking platform for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 20 ml 30 mM neocuprine hydrate in ethanol. The gel was rinsed three times with distilled water, wrapped with plastic foil and autoradiographed for 15 min. Titration of HSF into the binding reaction yields a pattern of three retarded bands (lst-3rd shift, Fig. 1 A). The areas corresponding to free DNA and to the 2nd and 3rd shifts were cut from the gel and the intact gel pieces were incubated in 500 [mu]l TE (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) and 100 ng/[mu]l proteinase K overnight at 37oC. The liquid was transferred into a new tube, 500 [mu]l 5 M NaCl and 50 [mu]l (500 [mu]g) Dynabeads Streptavidin M-280 (Dynal, Oslo; washed according to the manufacturer's recommendation) was added. The immobilisation occurred during a 30 min incubation at room temperature with occasional gentle agitation. The liquid trapped in the lid was collected by a short spin and DNA beads were concentrated for 30 s on a magnetic particle concentrator (MPC, Dynal, Oslo). The supernatant was removed and the beads were washed three times with TE. Finally the beads were suspended in 5 [mu]l formamide loading buffer, heated to 75oC and the released DNA fragments separated on a sequencing gel as described ( 3 ). We routinely recover >60% of the radioactivity from the gel slice for separation on the sequencing gel. Figure 1 B demonstrates that the footprint obtained from the 2nd shift is due to binding of HSF at HSE 1 (lane 2), whereas the more retarded 3rd shift contains HSF bound to HSE 1 and HSE 2 (lane 1) ( 4 ).


Figure 1 . ( A ) Increasing amounts of recombinant HSF (indicated by a triangle) were allowed to bind a biotinylated DNA fragment derived from the Drosophila hsp70 promoter. The protein-DNA complexes were resolved on a native acrylamide gel and treated with OP-Cu in the gel. Autoradiography reveals three protein-DNA complexes (1st-3rd shift). The lane 0 represents the protein free sample. ( B ) Bands corresponding to the 2nd and 3rd shift of (A) were excised and the DNA eluted using streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads as described in the text. Analysis of the recovered DNA on a sequencing gel reveals the nature of the HSF-HSE interactions in the various complexes. The footprints are indicated by a shaded rectangle with its corresponding name. G and G/A represent respectively G and G/A specific chemical sequencing lanes. The OP-Cu pattern obtained are N for the free probe, 1 for the 3rd shift and 2 for the 2nd shift.

Failure to immobilise eluted DNA is a strong indication that a shift was caused by protein binding to contaminating single strands (no biotin), and therefore has diagnostic value. Purification of DNA fragments by immobilisation on paramagnetic beads yields DNA with high purity and integrity in the shortest time. Multiple samples can be processed in parallel and, since the efficiency of DNA recovery is high, the amount of input radioactivity can be reduced significantly. The suggested methodology can also be applied for chemical interference assays.

REFERENCES

1 Papavassiliou,A.G. (1994) In Kneale,G.G. (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, New Jersey, Vol. 5, pp. 43-78.

2 Helbl,V. and Hillen,W. (1995) Methods Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 145-151.

3 Sandaltzopoulos,R., Quivy,J.-P. and Becker,P.B. (1995) Meth. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 176-181.

4 Clos,J., Westwood,T., Becker,P.B., Wilson,S., Lambert,K. and Wu,C. (1990) Cell, 63, 1085-1097.


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 6221 387 490; Fax: +49 6221 387 518; Email: quivy@embl-heidelberg.de
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (38K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ragnhildstveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quivy, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ragnhildstveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quivy, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?