Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (202K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajeev, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ganesh, K. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajeev, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ganesh, K. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 4187-4193

Triplex formation at physiological pH: comparative studies on DNA triplexes containing 5-Me-dC tethered at N4 with spermine and tetraethyleneoxyamine

Triplex formation at physiological pH: comparative studies on DNA triplexes containing 5-Me-dC tethered at N 4 with spermine and tetraethyleneoxyamine Kallanthottathil G. Rajeev, Vasant R. Jadhav and Krishna N. Ganesh*

Division of Organic Chemistry, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411008, India

Received August 29, 1997; Revised and Accepted September 23, 1997

ABSTRACT

Oligodeoxynucleotides with spermine conjugation at C4 of 5-Me-dC (sp-ODN) exhibit triple helix formation with complementary Watson-Crick duplexes, and were optimally stable at physiological pH 7.3 and low salt concentration. This was attributed to a favored reassociation of the polycationic third strand with the anionic DNA duplex. To gain further insights into the factors that contribute to the enhancement of triplex stability and for engineering improved triplex systems, the spermine appendage at C4 of 5-Me-dC was replaced with 1,11-diamino-3,6,9-trioxaundecane to create teg-ODNs. From the triple helix forming abilities of these modified ODNs studied by hysteresis behaviour and the effect of salts on triplex stability, it is demonstrated here that teg-ODNs stabilise triplexes through hydrophobic desolvation while sp-ODNs stabilise triplexes by charge effects. The results imply that factors in addition to base stacking effects and interstrand hydrogen bonds are significantly involved in modulation of triplex stability by base modified oligonucleotides.

INTRODUCTION

Oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) directed triplex formation is increasingly attracting attention due to its therapeutic potential (1 -7 ). Triple helix formation depends on Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds between thymine (T) with an A:T base pair (T*A:T triplet) and protonated cytosine (C+) with a G:C base pair (C+*G:C triplet) (8 -12 ). This arrangement requires a polypurine central strand for constituting triplexes which are optimally stable at non-physiological pH 5.6-6.0. Several approaches have recently appeared in the literature to overcome these limitations through the use of chemically modified nucleobases (13 -21 ) in the third strand to increase its affinity to duplex DNA at intracellular conditions and employing pyrimidine analogs endowed with bidirectional hydrogen bonding when present in the central strand (22 -25 ). Spermine is known to promote triplex stabilization, both upon external addition (26 -28 ) as well as upon conjugation to ODN at the 5'-terminus (29 ,30 ), 2'O (31 ) and C5 of dU (32 ). The polycationic effect of spermine on triplex stabilization has also been realised through linking of basic peptides (33 ). We have recently demonstrated that ODNs with spermine conjugation at C4 of 5-Me-dC (sp-ODN) (34 ) exhibit triple helix formation with complementary Watson-Crick duplexes, with optimal stability at low salt concentration and physiological pH 7.3; the corresponding unmodified ODNs do not form triplexes in these conditions (35 ,36 ). Further, N3 protonation of C (conjugated with spermine) in the third strand was not observed in sp-ODN triplexes and the loss in stability thereby due to the absence of the (C)N3-H--N7(G) Hoogsteen bond is compensated by favorable electrostatic interactions of the sperminyl side chain with DNA, leading to an enhanced association with the duplex. Towards understanding the role of the tetraprotonated spermine side chain in causing triplex stability, this appendage at C4 of 5-Me-dC was replaced with the tetraethyleneoxyglycolamine that has only a single protonation site, to obtain teg-ODNs for constituting triplexes. We present here comparative biophysical studies of triplexes derived from sp-ODN and teg-ODN in the third strand employing measurements of thermal stability, hysteresis and the effect of salts on thermal transitions of the corresponding triplexes. It is demonstrated that teg-ODNs when present as a third strand, form triplexes with increased stability even at neutral pH, in contrast to the unmodified controls that form triplexes only at a lower pH. The origin of the teg-ODN triplex stability is shown to be due to hydrophobic desolvation in contrast to sp-ODNs which stabilise the triplex by charge effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All chemicals used were of reagent quality or better grade. Base protected standard nucleoside phopsphoramidites and 5'O-DMT-nucleoside derived controlled pore glass supports (CPG) were purchased from Cruachem UK. T4 polynucleotide kinase and Klenow polymerase from United States Biochemicals and [[gamma]-32P]ATP, [[alpha]-32P]CTP from Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Bombay were used for radiolabelling of oligonucleotides.

Oligonucleotide synthesis, purification and primer extension

All oligonucleotides were synthesized on 1.3 µmol scale on a Pharmacia GA plus DNA synthesizer using CPG and nucleobase (A, G, C and T) protected 5'-O-(4,4'-dimethoxytrityl) deoxyribonucleoside-3'-O-[(N,N-diisopropylamino)-[beta]-cyanoethyl phosphoramidite] monomers, followed by deprotection with aqueous NH3. The teg-monomer 3 was synthesised by the procedure described below. All oligonucleotides were purified by reversed phase FPLC on a C18 column and the purity was rechecked on reverse phase HPLC using buffer systems A: 5% CH3CN in 0.1 M triethylammoniumacetate (TEAA) and B: 30% CH3CN in 0.1 M TEAA with a gradient A to B of 1.5%/min at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. Retention time for teg-ODNs: 12 (11.86 min), 13 (11.65 min), 14 (11.84 min), 15 (12.08 min) and 16 (12.22 min). To check the migration behavior of teg-ODNs on PAGE the purified oligonucleotides were labeled at the 5'-end using 5'-[[gamma]-32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase according to standard procedures (37 ). The radiolabeled oligonucleotide samples were run on a 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea with 90 mM Tris-borate-EDTA (pH 8.3) as buffer. Samples were mixed in formamide, heated to 70oC for 5 min and then cooled in an ice bath before loading on the gel. Autoradiograms were developed after 1 h exposure using an intensifying screen.

The primer extension reactions were carried out in a total volume of 20 µl containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µM each of dATP, dGTP, TTP, [[alpha]-32P]CTP and 2 µM of appropriate annealed duplex. The reactions were initiated by addition of 2 U Klenow Polymerase I at 25oC for 1 h. The reactions were terminated by freeze-drying, dissolved in formamide and then analysed by denaturing gel electrophoresis as described above.


Scheme 1.

3'-O-(2-Cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramido)-5'- O-(4,4'-dimethoxytrityl)-5-methyl-4-N-(11-N-trifluoroacetamido-3,6,9-trioxaundecyl)-2'-deoxycytidine (3)

5'-O-DMT-C4-(2,6-dimethyl)phenyl-5-methyluridine (34 ), 1, (0.45 g, 0.7 mmol) and 1,11-diamino-3,6,9-trioxaundecane 4, (1.0 g, 5.2 mmol, 7.5 eq.) were stirred in dry pyridine (2 ml) at 70oC for 48 h. Pyridine was removed from the reaction mixture under vacuum and the residue was taken in ethylacetate (20 ml), washed with water (10 ml), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporated to dryness. The residue was treated with ethyltrifluoroacetate in absolute ethanol at ambient temperature under basic conditions to get the N-trifluoroacetamide derivative 2. Compound 2 was purified by silica gel column chromatography using as an eluent chloroform/methanol/triethylamine 9:0.9:0.1, yield: 0.40 g (71%). 1H NMR [delta](CDCl3): 7.68(s, 1H), 7.60(bs, 1H, exchangeable with D2O), 7.44-7.39(m, 2H), 7.33-7.21(m, 7H), 6.84-6.80(d, 4H), 6.48-6.42(t, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz), 5.50(bs, 1H, exchangeable with D2O), 4.56(m, 1H), 4.10(m, 1H), 3.79(s, 6H), 3.75-3.31(m, 18H), 2.64-2.53(m, 1H), 2.26-2.20(m, 1H) and 1.48(s, 3H). 13C NMR [delta](CDCl3): 163.7, 158.7, 156.6, 144.7, 137.4, 135.8, 130.2, 128.3, 128.0, 127.0, 113.3, 102.4, 86.7, 86.1, 85.9, 72.0, 70.5, 70.3, 70.1, 69.5, 68.8, 63.8, 55.3, 42.0, 40.7, 39.7 and 12.4. FAB MS: 815 (M+ + 1).

The phosphoramidite monomer 3 was prepared from compound 2 by following the procedure as described in ref. 38 . 31P NMR [delta](CDCl3): 149.8 and 149.3 p.p.m.

Melting experiments

Duplex and triplex melting experiments were carried out in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.0-7.3 buffer, containing varying amounts of salts NaCl, Na2SO4, NaClO4 as mentioned in each case. Appropriate oligonucleotides, each at a strand concentration of 1 µM based on a UV absorbance of 260 nm calculated using molar extinction coefficients of dA = 15.4, dC = 7.3, dG = 11.7, T = 8.8 cm2/mmol, were mixed and heated at 70oC for 3 min, allowed to cool to room temperature followed by overnight storage at 4oC. The A260 nm at various temperatures were recorded using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 15 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, fitted with a water jacketed 5-cell holder and a Julabo temperature programmer with a heating rate of 0.5oC/min over 5-75oC. Dry nitrogen gas was flushed in the spectrophotometer chamber to prevent moisture condensation at temperatures <15oC. The triplex dissociation temperature (tm) was determined from the midpoint of the first transition in the plots of fraction absorbance change versus temperature and were further confirmed by differential (dA/dTversus T) curves. The tm values are accurate to ±0.5oC over the reported values. The reassociation of third strand with complementary duplex was studied by hysteresis experiments (36 ) in which the samples were heated (0.5oC/min) and maintained above triplex-duplex transition temperature for 10 min to achieve constant absorbance, followed by cooling (0.5oC/min).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Synthesis and characterization of teg-ODNs

The 5-Me-dC-N4-(teg) monomer 3 required for site-specific incorporation into oligonucleotide sequences was synthesised (Scheme 1) from displacement-coupling reaction (39 ,40 ) of 5'O-DMT-O4-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methyl dC 1 with 1,11-diamino- 3,6,9-trioxaundecane 4, followed by protection of [omega]'-amino group as trifluoroacetate and subsequent 3'O-phosphoramidation by standard procedures (38 ). The attachment of diaminopolyoxyethylenes at C4 of pyrimidine by following a similar strategy and its incorporation into ODNs has been used for synthesis of oligonucleotides bearing reporter functional groups (41 ,42 ). The diamine 4 was obtained from tetraethyleneglycol in three steps (43 ), with purification and complete characterization of products at all stages by chromatographic and spectroscopic methods. The modifieddC-amidite monomer 3 was purified to homogeneity by column chromatography and characterised through 31P NMR and mass spectroscopy. This was incorporated into the oligonucleotide sequences 12-16 at the indicated positions, followed by aqueous NH3 treatment for complete deprotection and FPLC purification. The ODNs were 5'end radiolabelled and their purity was rechecked by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Spermine conjugated ODNs (sp-ODNs) 7-11 were synthesised as reported earlier (35 ,36 ).


Figure 1. (A) UV-melting profiles of duplexes constituted from teg-ODNs in Tris buffer (pH 7.3 ) containing NaCl (100 mM) and MgCl2 (20 mM). (a) 5:16, (b) 5:15, (c) 5:13 and (d) 5:6. (B) UV melting profiles of triplexes constituted from teg-ODNs in Tris buffer (pH 7.3) containing NaCl (100 mM) and MgCl2 (20 mM). (a) 16*17:18, (b) 15*17:18, (c) 13*17:18 and (d) 12*17:18.

Thermal stability of teg-ODN duplexes and triplexes

Figure 1 and Table 1 document UV tm results on duplexes and triplexes derived from teg-ODNs. The duplexes from teg-ODN containing different degrees of substitutions (5:12, 5:13, 5:15 and 5:16) exhibited lower tms compared with the control unmodified duplex 5:6, similar to the behaviour of sp-ODN duplexes (35 ); the destabilising order being control 5:6 [approx] (3') 5:12 < (M) 5:13 < (3',5') 5:15 < (3',5',M) 5:16. The terminally modified teg-ODNs 12 and 15 with the complementary 24mer duplex 17:18 showed triplex transitions even in the absence of Mg++, in contrast to the control 6*17:18 where triplex was not observed. Under these conditions, the triplex transitions with teg-ODNs 13 and 16 were not detectable perhaps due to the destabilising nature of the centrally modified oligonucleotides and/or a low hypochromism. From an application perspective the terminal modifications are more advantageous than the internal one as they are less destabilising.

Table 1 . Melting data for teg-ODN duplexes and triplexes
Duplex tm oC Triplex tm oC
      -Mg++ +Mg++
5:6 50 6*17:18 nd 30
5:12 50 12*17:18 34 47
5:13 47 13*17:18 nd 42
5:15 42 15*17:18 23 41
5:16 29 16*17:18 nd 24
nd, not detected.

In the presence of Mg++ all teg-ODNs formed triplexes and the tms of terminally modified triplexes 12*17:18 and 15*17:18 were enhanced by 13 and 18oC respectively compared with the triplex formed in the absence of Mg++. The trisubstituted teg-ODN 16*17:18 was less stable than the control 6*17:18. The triplex tm of teg-ODNs decreased upon lowering of pH (12*17:18, 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, tm 41oC; 20 mM Tris, pH 7.3, tm 47oC, in presence of 100 mM NaCl and 20 mM MgCl2, [Delta]tm pH 7.3-5.5 = 6oC) and was qualitatively similar to that seen with the corresponding sp-ODN triplexes ([Delta]tm pH 7.3-5.5 = 11oC) (36 ) under identical conditions, but with a lower magnitude. In sp-ODN, such a behaviour was attributed to a protonated spermine side chain at C4 causing a lower pKa of N3 due to electrostatic repulsion, as compared with that of dC in unmodified ODN. Unlike sp-ODNs, teg-ODNs lack multiple protonation sites in the side chain; however, the presence of a single protonated amino function at terminus may slightly disfavour N3 protonation due to electrostatic repulsion and hence destabilise the triplexes but to a lesser extent compared with sp-ODNs. No change in tm of unmodified triplex 6*17:18 was observed upon external addition of 1 mM 1,11-diamino-3,6,9-trioxaundecane, unlike that seen from external addition of spermine which enhances triplex stability (26 -28 ). To understand the role of conjugated polyoxyethyleneamino chain in teg-ODN in inducing stable triplexes, the differential behaviour of heating and cooling curves (hysteresis) were examined.

Hysteresis in teg-ODN triplexes

We have shown earlier that the stability of sp-ODN triplexes arises from favoured reassociation with complementary duplex mediated by polycationic spermine chain (36 ). To examine corresponding effects in teg-ODN triplexes, heating and cooling curves were recorded for triplex transitions, both in the presence and absence of Mg++ and the results are shown in Figure 2 . No significant hysteresis for triplex <-> duplex transition was observed with teg-ODN triplexes in presence of Mg++ upon cooling (Fig. 2 a). However, in the absence of Mg++, teg-ODN significantly exhibited a strong hysteresis (Fig. 2 b) which was absent in the corresponding sp-ODN triplex, both with and without Mg++ (Fig. 2 c and d). In the case of sp-ODN triplexes, the electrostatic interaction of the protonated side chain with the phosphate backbone and/or hydrogen bonding with nucleobases, causes enhancement of the reassociation rate. In case of teg-ODN having polyether functions that are non-protonated under the experimental conditions, the observed triplex stability must arise from factors other than charge effects, for example, hydrophobic desolvation of the major groove of the duplex by the appended polyethylene glycol side chain of the third strand. The polyether side chain may alter the hydration network in its vicinity in the major groove, thereby improving the third strand association via hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions with neighbouring DNA strands.

It has been previously reported (44 ) that external addition of polyethylene glycols in the range PEG 400-3400 in molar concentrations, induces a dramatic change in the melting temperature of duplex and triplex with increasing concentration and molecular weight of polymer. The observed effect of PEGs was attributed to a combination of multiple factors including salt concentration, water activity and solution crowding (45 -47 ). In light of this, comparative effects of salts on sp- and teg-ODN triplex transitions were studied.

Effect of salts on stability of sp-ODN and teg-ODN triplexes

The triplex stabilities are strongly influenced by the presence of salt and are more cation specific as compared with duplex stability (48 ). In addition to electrostatic interaction, salts can also influence/affect hydrophobic interaction in condensation and precipitation of biopolymers (49 ,50 ). The stability of proteins is influenced by the hydrating ability of anions which follows the order SO42- > Cl- [approx] Br- >ClO4- > CNS-. This has also been recently employed to establish the hydrophobic nature of the calicheamicin-DNA interaction which is enhanced in the presence of a strong antichaotropic agent such as Na2SO4 but decreases in the presence of a weakly hydrated chaotropic agent such as LiClO4 (51 ). A comparative study of the effects of these salts on sp- and teg-ODN triplexes should therefore help in defining the nature of interaction (charge/hydrophobic) of the side chains conjugated to the third strand with the duplex.


Figure 2. Hysteresis curves of teg-ODN triplex 15*17:18 (a and b) and sp-ODN triplex 10*17:18 (c and d) at pH 7.3 in Tris buffer containing NaCl (100 mM). (a) and (c) in the presence of MgCl2 (20 mM); (b) and (d) in the absence of MgCl2; solid lines show heating curves while dashed lines show cooling curves.

Both sp-ODN and teg-ODN triplexes showed enhancement of tm upon increasing NaCl concentration from 100 to 900 mM (Fig. 3 B). The melting of teg-ODN triplexes were more salt dependent than those of sp-ODN triplexes, as evident from a higher slope for teg-ODN triplex in salt concentration-tm plot (data not shown). Comparative UV-tm data for triplexes containing either sp-ODN or teg-ODN recorded in Tris buffer containing salts of different compositions are indicated in Figure 3 B. Addition of 100 mM Na2SO4 to the buffer instead of 100 mM NaCl had no major consequence on the tm of sp-ODN triplexes irrespective of the position and degree of substitution (A, B, C) except in the case of trisubstituted sp-ODN triplex which was slightly destabilised. On the other hand, 100 mM Na2SO4 induced a significant rise in tm of teg-ODN triplexes, whose magnitude increased with the degree of substitution (D, E, F).


Figure 3. (A) Bar diagram shows anion dependence of sp-ODN and teg-ODN triplex tm in Tris buffer at pH 7.3. L stands for buffer containing NaCl (100 mM) and R stands for buffer containing Na2SO4 (100 mM). A (7*17:18), B (10*17:18) and C (11*17:18) represent sp-ODN triplexes with single, double and triple modifications respectively. D (12*17:18), E (15*17:18) and F (16*17:18) represent teg-ODN triplexes with single, double and triple modifications respectively. (B) Bar diagram shows salt dependence of sp-ODN 7*17:18 and teg-ODN 12*17:18 triplex tm in Tris buffer at pH 7.3 having different salt composition. (a) 500 mM NaCl (b) 100 mM NaCl + 400 mM Na2SO4 (c) 900 mM NaCl and (d) 100 mM NaCl + 400 mM LiClO4.

In the case of trisubstituted teg-ODN (Fin Fig. 3 A), triplex formation which was undetectable with 100 mM NaCl, showed up only in the presence of 100 mM Na2SO4. This rise in tm of teg-ODN triplexes in the presence of 100 mM Na2SO4, could arise from increased concentrations of either cation (Na+) or anion (SO42-). Hence, a set of UV-tm experiments on 3'-monosubstituted triplexes 7*17:18 (sp-ODN) and 12*19:20 (teg-ODN) were carried out at different compositions of NaCl and Na2SO4, keeping the total cation concentration constant and the results are depicted in Figure 3 B. Increasing Na+ concentration from 500 mM [Fig. 3 B(a)] to 900 mM [Fig. 3 B(c)] enhanced the tm of both sp-ODN and teg-ODN triplexes. In the presence of 100 mM NaCl with 400 mM Na2SO4 (total [Na+] = 900 mM) [Fig. 3 B(b)], sp-ODN showed a lower tm compared with that at 900 mM NaCl alone [Fig. 3 B(c)]. In contrast, the teg-ODN triplex was equally stable in both salt compositions. Similarly, addition of 400 mM LiClO4 [Fig. 3 B(d)] induced a slight destabilization of sp-ODN triplex tm as compared with that at 500 mM NaCl [Fig. 3 B(a)], while no such effect was seen with teg-ODN triplex. Thus, salts have differential effects on teg- and sp-ODN triplexes with more stabilization effect on teg-ODN triplexes than for sp-ODN. The observed order of induced stablility by the anions SO42- > Cl- > ClO4- which is the same as their hydrating abilities suggests that hydrophobic effects from the polyethyleneoxy side chain could contribute significantly to the stability of the teg-ODN triplex (51 ).

Gel retardation and primer extension with sp-ODN and teg-ODN

The relative cationic charge contributions to the properties of sp-ODN and teg-ODN can also be probed by their electrophoretic behaviour. We had previously observed that sp-ODNs were considerably retarded in gel mobility on PAGE, compared with the unmodified ODNs and the retardation increases with the degree of substitution (36 ). The mobility retardation in electrophoresis results from the positive charges of conjugated spermine chain and we sought to examine this effect in teg-ODNs which have only a single terminal amino group in side chain. Similar to sp-ODNs, the 5'-end 32P-labelled teg-ODNs showed retardation on gel compared with unmodified ODNs, but lower compared with that of sp-ODN. The retardation (Table 2 ) increased with the degree of substitution and interestingly exhibited a dependence on the position of the modification in the sequence. The terminally modified monosubstituted ODNs (3'/5') in each class had not only closer Rf values, but retarded slightly more than the centrally modified ODNs. Since the molecular weight differences between the two types of modifications is <10, the observed retardation differences among sp- and teg-ODNs arise mostly from charge effects, the higher positive charge in sp-ODN leading to a relatively greater retardation.

Table 2 . Gel retardation data on sp-ODNs and teg-ODNsa
Modified side Rf value
  sp-ODN teg-ODN
5' 0.76 (9) 0.83 (14)
3' 0.76 (7) 0.84 (12)
M 0.84 (8) 0.89 (13)
5', 3' 0.56 (10) 0.70 (15)
5', 3', M 0.34 (11) 0.60 (16)
aRf value for unsubstituted ODN, 1.0

It would be interesting to see the effect of conjugation of polyamine and polyether functions to nucleobases in oligonucleotides on their ability to act as substrates in biological reactions. The chain extension reactions were individually carried out by DNA polymerase Klenow Pol I (52 ) using a common 25mer ODN 19 as the template and sp-ODNs 7-11 and teg-ODNs 12-16 as primers, all in unlabeled form. The presence of [[alpha]-32P]dCTP as one of the dNTPs in the reaction mixture enabled unambiguous detection of only the primer extended products incorporating the radiolabel, as analysed by denaturing gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography shown in Figure 4 . The 5'-end 32P-labeled 19 (lane 1) used as a marker, confirmed that both classes of modified oligomers, regardless of the position and degree of modification, act as efficient primers to yield 25mer extended products. The characteristic gel mobility retardation seen for the modified primers (Table 2 ) was also evident in their corresponding extended chains, with teg-ODN products showing a lower retardation than sp-ODN products.


Figure 4. Autoradiogram of denaturing PAGE of chain extended products obtained using 19 (25mer) as template and sp-ODNs and teg-ODNs as primers (18mer). As both primer and template are unlabelled, only the primer extended products are seen due to the incorporation of [[alpha]-32P]dCTP during extension reaction. Lanes 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 correspond to the primer extended products obtained from sp-ODNs 9, 7, 8, 10 and 11 respectively while lanes 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 correspond to the primer extended products from teg-ODNs 12, 13, 15, 16 and 14 respectively. Lane 1 shows 5'-end labeled 19 (25mer) as marker for size comparison.

Origin of triplex stability: sp-ODN versus teg-ODN

The experimental data presented in this and an earlier paper (36 ) clearly demonstrate that oligonucleotides with a spermine or a tetraethyleneoxyamine side chain appended at C4 of 5-Me-dC form stable triplexes under low salt conditions. UV difference spectra and pKa measurements indicate that N3 of sp-ODN is predominantly non-protonated at pH 7.0 and hence handicapped by the loss of one HG hydrogen bond with N7 of dG in central strand. The stability of the sp-ODN triplex under low salt conditions (100 mM NaCl) is due to enhanced reassociation of the duplex and third strand, caused by favored interaction of conjugated cationic spermine electrostatically with the anionic phosphate backbone and through possible hydrogen bonding interaction with bases on the duplex. In the case of teg-ODN triplexes, which lack a polycationic side chain, the triplex stability arises from a fine tuning of the microenvironment by the polyether side chain in terms of desolvation, facilitating a hydrophobic interaction. This is based on the effect of strongly hydrated, antichaotropic agent Na2SO4 which enhanced the tm of teg-ODN triplexes in contrast to the weakly hydrated chaotropic agent NaClO4 which destabilised the teg-ODN triplex. This is consistent with a hydrophobic nature of the interaction of the teg side chain with DNA duplex. In contrast to the ionic interaction of sp-ODN, hydrophobic binding in teg-ODN is weaker as shown by a lower stabilizing and a greater hysteresis effect, but nevertheless significant, since teg-ODNs form triplexes with a better stability compared with unmodified controls. In both sp- and teg-ODNs, substitutions in the interior are less stabilizing than substitutions towards the 3'/5' termini. This is apparent from the nucleation-zipping model for association-dissociation of duplex (53 ), also valid for triplexes (54 ) where nucleation involving terminal 3-4 base triplets governs the rate determining step for association of the third strand with duplex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies on triple helices employing spermine and polyether conjugated ODNs as third strand have shown remarkable stabilization at physiological pH, conditions under which ODNs containing dC and 5-Me-dC fail to show triplex formation. The stability of sp-ODN triplexes at low salt conditions can be attributed to an accelerated reassociation of third strand with duplex, while teg-ODNs stabilize triplexes through hydrophobic desolvation. In contrast to the ionic interactions of sp-ODN, hydrophobic binding in teg-ODN is weaker. These results suggest that triplex stabilities can be modulated via covalent conjugates through factors other than base stacking and interstrand H-bonding.Since polyamines and polyoxyethylenes are well known to interact with membranes, studies on sp and teg-ODNs presented here may have significance in evolving newer strategies to improve cell permeability and in the development of ligand conjugated oligonucleotide analogues as non-cytotoxic candidates for antisense/antigene therapeutics.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

KGR and VRJ thank CSIR, New Delhi for financial support. KNG acknowledges Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, of which he is a Honorary Senior Fellow. This paper is NCL communication number 6406.

REFERENCES

1 Cooney, M., Czernuszewicz, G., Postel, E.H., Flint, S.J. and Hogan, M.E. (1988) Science, 241, 456-459. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Maher, L.J., Wold, B. and Dervan, P.B. (1989) Science, 245, 725-730. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Maher, L.J. (1992) BioEssays, 14, 807-811. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Thuong, N.T. and Helene, C. (1993) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl, 32, 666-690.

5 Milligan, J.F., Matteucci, M.D. and Martin, J.C. (1993) J. Med. Chem., 36, 1923-1937. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Crooke, S.T. (1995) In Wolff, M.E. (ed.) Burgers Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, NY, USA.

7 Sun, J.-S, Garestier, T. and Helene, C. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6, 327-333. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Moser, H.E. and Dervan, P.B. (1987) Science, 238, 645-650. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Francois, J.C., Saison-Behmoras, T., Thuong, N.T. and Helene, C. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 9617-9619. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Rajagopal, P. and Feigon, J. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 7859-7870. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Singleton, S.F. and Dervan, P.B. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 10995-11003. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Radhakrishnan, I. and Patel, D.J. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 11405-11416. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Ganesh, K.N., Kumar, V.A. and Barawkar, D.B. (1996) In Hamilton, A.D. (ed.) Perspectives in Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol 3, Supramolecular Control of Structure and Reactivity. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. pp. 263-327.

14 Koh, J.S. and Dervan, P.B. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc, 114, 1470-1478.

15 Krawczyk, S.H., Milligan, J.F., Wadwani, S., Moulds, C., Froehler, B.C. and Matteucci, M.D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 3761-3764. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Froehler, B.C., Wadwani, S., Terhorst, T.J. and Gerrard, S.R. (1992) Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 5307-5310.

17 Froehler, B.C. and Ricca, D.J. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 8320-8322.

18 Jetter, M.C. and Hobbs, F.W. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 3249-3254. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Huang, C.Y. and Miller, P.S. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 10456-10457.

20 Xiang, H., Soussou, W. and Mclaughlin, L.W. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 11155-11156.

21 Krosigk, U.V. and Benner, S.A. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5361-5362.

22 Ono, A., Ts'O, P.O.P and Kan, L.S. (1992), J. Org. Chem. 57, 3225-3230.

23 Hashimoto, H., Nelson, M.G. and Switzer, C. (1993) J. Org. Chem. 58, 4194-4195.

24 Egli, M. (1996) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng., 35, 1894-1909.

25 Hildbrand, S. and Leumann, C. (1996) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng., 35, 1968-19695.

26 Hampel, K.J., Crosson, P. and Lee, J.S. (1991) Biochemistry, 30, 4455-4459. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Thomas, T. and Thomas, T.J. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 14068-14074. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Volker, J. and Klump, H.H. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 13502-13508. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Tung, C.H., Breslauer, K.J. and Stein, S. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 5489-5494. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Bigey, P., Prativel, G. and Meunier, B. (1995) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. 181-182.

31 Sund, C., Puri, N. and Chattopadhyaya, J. (1996) Tetrahedron, 52, 12275-12290.

32 Nara, H., One, A. and Matsuda, A. (1995) Bioconjugate Chem., 6, 54-61.

33 Tung, C.H., Breslauer, K.J. and Stein, S. (1996) Bioconjugate Chem., 7, 529-531.

34 Prakash, T.P., Barawkar, D.A., Kumar, V.A. and Ganesh, K.N. (1994) BioMed. Chem. Lett., 4, 1733-1738.

35 Barawkar, D.A., Kumar, V.A. and Ganesh, K.N. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 205, 1665-1670. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Barawkar, D.A., Rajeev, K.G., Kumar, V.A. and Ganesh, K.N. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 1229-1237. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) In Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

38 Sinha, N.D., Biernat, J., McManus, J. and Koster, H. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res., 12, 4539-4577. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Zhou, X.-X. and Chattopadhyaya, J. (1986) Tetrahedron, 42, 5149-5156.

40 MacMillan, A.M. and Verdine, G.L. (1991) Tetrahedron, 47, 2603-2616.

41 Pieles, U., Sproat, B.S. and Lamm, G.M. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 4355-4360. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Markiewicz, W.T., Groger, G., Rosch, R., Zebrowska, A. and Seliger H. (1992) Nucleosides Nucleotides, 11, 1703-1711.

43 Zalpisky, S., Gilon, C. and Zilkha, A. (1983) Eur. Polym. J., 19, 1177-1183.

44 Spink, C.H. and Chaires, J.B. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 12887-12888.

45 Zimmerman, S.B. and Trach, S.O. (1990) Biopolymers, 30, 703-718. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Zimmerman, S.B. and Murphy, L.D. (1992) Biopolymers, 32, 1365-1373. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Tasaki, K. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 8459-8469.

48 Plum, G.E., Pilch, D.S., Singleton, S.F. and Breslauer, K.J. (1995) Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 24, 319-350.

49 Bloomfield, V.A. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6, 334-341. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Melander, W. and Horvath, C. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 183, 200-215. MEDLINE Abstract

51 Ding, W.-D and Ellestad, G.A. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 6617-6620.

52 Joyce, C.M. and Grindley, N.D.F. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 80, 1830-1834. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Porschke, D. and Eigen, M. (1971) J. Mol. Biol., 62, 361-381. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Rougee, M., Faucon B., Mergny, J.L., Barcelo, F., Givannangeli, C., Garesteir, T. and Helene, C. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 9269-9278. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 212 335153; Fax: +91 212 335153; Email: kng@ems.ncl.res.in


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
P. Guga, M. Janicka, A. Maciaszek, B. Rebowska, and G. Nowak
Hoogsteen-Paired Homopurine [RP-PS]-DNA and Homopyrimidine RNA Strands Form a Thermally Stable Parallel Duplex
Biophys. J., November 15, 2007; 93(10): 3567 - 3574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. A. Rusling, V. E. C. Powers, R. T. Ranasinghe, Y. Wang, S. D. Osborne, T. Brown, and K. R. Fox
Four base recognition by triplex-forming oligonucleotides at physiological pH
Nucleic Acids Res., May 23, 2005; 33(9): 3025 - 3032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. D. Osborne, V. E. C. Powers, D. A. Rusling, O. Lack, K. R. Fox, and T. Brown
Selectivity and affinity of triplex-forming oligonucleotides containing 2'-aminoethoxy-5-(3-aminoprop-1-ynyl)uridine for recognizing AT base pairs in duplex DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., August 18, 2004; 32(15): 4439 - 4447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Murphy, R. Eritja, and G. Redmond
Monitoring denaturation behaviour and comparative stability of DNA triple helices using oligonucleotide-gold nanoparticle conjugates
Nucleic Acids Res., April 23, 2004; 32(7): e65 - e65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Michel, C. Martinand-Mari, F. Debart, B. Lebleu, I. Robbins, and J.-J. Vasseur
Cationic phosphoramidate {alpha}-oligonucleotides efficiently target single-stranded DNA and RNA and inhibit hepatitis C virus IRES-mediated translation
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2003; 31(18): 5282 - 5290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Broitman, O. Amosova, N. G. Dolinnaya, and J. R. Fresco
Repairing the Sickle Cell Mutation. I. SPECIFIC COVALENT BINDING OF A PHOTOREACTIVE THIRD STRAND TO THE MUTATED BASE PAIR
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 1999; 274(31): 21763 - 21768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (202K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajeev, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ganesh, K. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajeev, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ganesh, K. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?