Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (132K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pires, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pires, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 4771-4777

Covalent cross-linking of duplex DNA using 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine as a readily modifiable platform for introduction of reactive functionality into oligonucleotides

Covalent cross-linking of duplex DNA using 4-thio-2 '-deoxyuridine as a readily modifiable platform for introduction of reactive functionality into oligonucleotides Robert S. Coleman* and Richard M. Pires

Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, 100 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1185, USA

Received August 13, 1997; Revised and Accepted October 6, 1997

ABSTRACT

Full details of the template-directed covalent cross-linking of duplex oligodeoxynucleotides are presented. 4-Thio-2'-deoxyuridine was incorporated synthetically into a 17mer oligodeoxynucleotide, and the thiocarbonyl group of the modified base was alkylated with a variety of [alpha]-bromoacetyl-derivatized diamines. Covalent cross-linking was initiated by annealing the electrophilic probe oligomers with their complementary sequences, where a dG base was targeted at the position complementary to the modified 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine. The sequence selectivity of cross-link formation as a function of tether topology and rigidity was examined, and the thermal stability of the modified duplexes was measured by UV melting experiments.

INTRODUCTION

In 1967, Grineva and co-workers published a communication describing a novel method for the covalent modification of oligonucleotides, using what they described as `complementary addressed modification' (1 ). In this protocol, a chemically reactive group is covalently linked to the end of a synthetic oligonucleotide, which upon duplex formation induces modification of the complementary strand. In the intervening 30 years, this basic protocol has been expanded upon by a large number of workers, for a variety of purposes (2 ).

A number of workers have used the Grineva concept to effect covalent cross-linking or modification of DNA. Particularly pertinent examples include those of Vlassov using a 3' or 5'-tethered N-(2-chloroethyl)arylamines (3 -5 ), Summerton and Bartlett (6 ) with a tethered [alpha]-bromoketone, Matteucci (7 ) with an N,N-ethanocytosine, Dervan (8 -10 ) with an [alpha]-haloacetamido group within a triple-helical complex, and Ohtsuka (11 ) and Tabone and co-workers (12 ) using an [alpha]-haloacetamide system within duplex DNA. These workers have achieved varying degrees of success in effecting covalent cross-linking, ranging from 1-2% to essentially quantitative. In addition, there are a number of reports from Helénè (13 ), among several others, wherein intercalating or photochemically active groups have been tethered to oligonucleotides. The principal chemical feature differentiating these studies is whether the reactive group is tethered to the end of the oligonucleotide or is appended via the heterocyclic bases.

As part of these developments, and in conjunction with studies on the molecular mechanism of carcinogen action and biophysical studies on oligonucleotide structure, a diverse and extensive array of non-natural nucleosides and nucleoside surrogates have been incorporated into synthetic strands of DNA and RNA (14 -17 ). Of direct relevance to our studies, purine and pyrimidine-based nucleic acids containing thiocarbonyl groups have been incorporated synthetically into oligonucleotides (18 -26 ). The thiocarbonyl group gives these oligomers unique properties by virtue of the enhanced nucleophilicity of sulfur compared to the oxygen and nitrogen nucleophiles normally present in DNA and RNA. We have used this reactivity to incorporate tethers site-specifically onto 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine (27 ,28 ) and 6-thio-2'-deoxyinosine bases (29 ) via chemoselective S-alkylation of the thiocarbonyl groups.

We have developed a protocol for covalent cross-linking of DNA that is based on introduction of chemically reactive functionality into probe oligonucleotides by post-synthetic S-alkylation of thionucleosides. We have reported our preliminary studies (30 ) on the template-directed cross-linking of duplex DNA using a 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine (dS4U) base to append an electrophilic cross-linking tether. In these studies, we demonstrated a method to form covalent lesions at the N7 position of complementary 2'-deoxyguanosine residues. We have more thoroughly explored this cross-linking reaction, and now we provide full details of our studies on the covalent cross-linking of duplex DNA using oligonucleotide probes to direct chemically reactive functionality to targeted sequences of nucleic acids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA synthesis and post-synthetic modification

Oligonucleotides were prepared as previously described using an Applied Biosystems 380B DNA Synthesizer with commercially available reagents and protocols. For the incorporation of 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine, our S-cyanoethyl phosphoramidite (31 ) was coupled at the desired position. Synthetic oligonucleotides and postsynthetically modified oligomers were characterized as described previously, by enzymatic digestion and chromatographic analysis (32 ). All oligonucleotides were purified by reverse-phase HPLC on a Hamilton PRP-1 column (4.6 mm × 25 cm).

Synthesis of electrophilic tethers

Electrophilic tethers (6-11, Scheme 1) were prepared by acylation of the corresponding commercially available diamines with bromoacetyl bromide (Et3N, THF). The `half-electrophile' 7 was prepared in a similar manner by first monoacylating ortho-phenylenediamine with acetic anhydride, then acylating the remaining amino group with bromoacetyl bromide. The design of tethers 6-11 incorporated variations in spacing between electrophilic sites and conformational flexibility of the intervening atoms.


Scheme 1.

N,N'-bis-bromoacetyl-1,2-diaminobenzene (6)

1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6) [delta] 9.72 (s, 2H, CONH), 7.52 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.6 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.22 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.6 Hz, 2H, ArH), 4.12 (s, 2H, COCH2Br); 13C NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6) [delta] 165.7, 130.8, 126.1, 125.4, 30.7; HRMS, m/z calcd for C10H10N2O279Br2: 347.9109; found: 347.9104.

N-acetyl-N'-bromoacetyl-1,2-diaminobenzene (7)

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) [delta] 9.62 (s, 1H, CONH), 9.43 (s, 1H, CONH), 7.60-7.45 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.20-7.12 (m, 2H, ArH), 4.13 (s, 2H, COCH2Br) 2.08 (s, 3H, COCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) [delta] 168.7, 165.0, 130.7, 130.0, 125.3, 124.9, 124.7, 30.3, 23.5;. HRMS, calcd for C10H11N2O279Br: 270.0004; found: 270.0005.

N,N'-bis-bromoacetyl-1,3-diaminobenzene (8)

1H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6) [delta] 10.42 (s, 2H, CONH), 7.94 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.29 (m, 3H, ArH), 4.02 (s, 4H, COCH2Br); 13C NMR (60 MHz, DMSO d6) [delta] 164.8, 138.9, 129.1, 114.7, 110.7, 30.3; HRMS, m/z calcd for C10H10N2O279Br2: 347.9109; found: 347.9114.

N,N'-bis-bromoacetyl-1,2-diaminoethane (9)

1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) [delta] 6.96 (br s, 2H, CONH), 3.90 (s, 4H, COCH2Br), 3.48 (m, 4H, NCH2); 13C NMR (60 MHz, DMSO d6) [delta] 166.6, 40.1, 28.7; HRMS, m/z calcd for C6H10N2O279Br2: 300.9010; found: 300.9016.

N,N'-bis-bromoacetyl-1,4-diaminobenzene (10)

1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) [delta] 10.35 (s, 2H, CONH), 7.57 (s, 4H, ArH), 4.03 (s, 4H, COCH2Br); 13C NMR (60 MHz, acetone-d6) [delta] 164.7, 134.7, 119.9, 30.5.; HRMS, m/z calcd for C10H10N2O279Br2: 347.9109; found: 347.9108.

N,N'-bis-bromoacetylhydrazine (11)

1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) [delta] 10.6 (s, 2H, CONH), 3.92 (s, 4H, COCH2Br); 13C NMR (60 MHz, DMSO d6) [delta] 164.4, 26.9; HRMS, m/z calcd for C4H6N2O279Br2: 271.8796; found: 271.8802.

Covalent modification of dS4U-containing oligomers

DNA (5 µl, 60 OU260/ml, 0.3 OU260 total) was diluted to 95 µl with 0.1 M K2HPO4/KH2PO4, pH 8.0. A solution of the electrophile was prepared (~1 mg in 30 µl of DMF) and this was added to the solution of DNA. The sample was allowed to sit at room temperature for 1.5 h. The reaction was terminated by passing the sample through a small spun column (0.3 ml of Sephadex G-25) and precipitating with n-butanol. The reaction was dried under vacuum briefly before further use. All electrophilic ODNs were used immediately after preparation.

[Delta]Tm Measurements

DNA helix-coil transitions were measured on a Beckman DU-660 spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier melting apparatus, using 10 mm path-length cuvettes and the Beckman software program. A stock solution containing an unmodified oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) and the complimentary modified or unmodified 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine containing ODN in equimolar amounts was made. Aliquots were removed from this stock solution and a series of dilutions was made to generate samples ranging in concentration from 6.0 × 10-7 to 9.4 × 10-6 M in total strand concentration. All melting samples had a final volume of 200 µl and were buffered to pH 7.0 using 0.1 M K2HPO4/KH2PO4 containing 0.1 M NaCl. These samples were warmed at 95°C for 5 min and allowed to cool slowly back to room temperature prior to melting experiments. Samples were loaded into cuvettes and allowed to equilibrate at 15°C for 5 min prior to melting. Melting was performed from 15 to 75°C, with a gradient of 0.5°C/min. Measurements were recorded every 0.2°C. All experiments were done in triplicate, and experimental Tm values varied <= 1°C between runs. In all cases, the shape of the melting curves clearly indicated a two-state system.

Cross-linking studies

DNA complimentary to the modified 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine containing probe strand [1.2 OU260 in 20 µl of distilled, deionized (dd) H2O] was 5' end-labeled using polynucleotide kinase (1 µl, 10 U) and [[gamma]-32P]ATP (1 µl, 10 mCi/ml, 6000 Ci/mmol). After 1 h at 37°C, the labeling reaction was warmed at 65°C for 5 min. The reaction was diluted to 100 µl with dd H2O and the unincorporated label was removed by passing the solution through a spun column (0.8 ml, Sephadex G-25). The 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine containing probe DNA (0.2 OU260) was dissolved in 4 µl of 0.1 M K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 8.0) and 2 µl of the complimentary radiolabeled DNA was added. The solution was incubated at 25°C and was sampled at specified time intervals (0.25-16 h) by removing an aliquot that was mixed with an equal volume of denaturing gel loading buffer. Unless otherwise indicated, cross-linking reactions were run for 16 h at 25°C. Samples were analyzed on a 20% polyacrylamide gel containing 20% formamide and 7 M urea (denaturing PAGE). Sites of cross-linking were determined by treating an aliquot of the reaction (3 µl) with 100 µl of 10% aqueous piperidine and heating for 25 min at 95°C. The solution was lyophilized to dryness and evaporated from 100 µl of H2O (3×) to remove residual piperidine. This sample was run on a denaturing 20% PAGE gel next to a standard Maxam-Gilbert G-sequencing lane (33 ). Gels were scanned using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and the bands were quantitated using the ImageQuanttm software provided by the manufacturer. Figures 2 -4 were produced by scanning autoradiogram films at 400 d.p.i. on an Apple One Scanner into a PICT file, increasing the brightness and contrast of the resulting image to improve legibility using Adobe Photoshop v. 3.0, and printing the figures as TIFF files on a high-resolution laser printer. The ratio of image intensity to signal over the entire range was linear, and was not effected by electronic processing.

RESULTS

Electrophilic oligonucleotide probes

The electrophilic tethers were designed based on our initially successful ortho-phenylenediamine system (30 ). Design criteria included: (i) electrophile reactivity; (ii) length of tether; (iii) topology of electrophile placement; (iv) conformational mobility of tether. We were most successful with [alpha]-bromoacetamide electrophiles, using a system where diamine platforms were used to position the electrophile with the desired topology, and this basic protocol provided us with a sufficient diversity of diamine-based tethers with which to explore cross-linking. Increasing tether length was less than effective at achieving reasonable rates and yields of cross-links, and the studies reported herein are limited to simple phenylenediamine and ethylenediamine derivatives. Propylenediamine and its higher homologs were poor tethers in our protocol. Topolology of electrophilic site placement and the tether rigidity played a major role both in effecting the yield and sequence selectivity of cross-link formation, and rather dramatic examples of this can be seen in a comparison of the ortho- and meta-phenylenediamines, and in the ortho-phenylenediamine versus ethylenediamine systems.

Cross-linking

Experiments on covalent cross-linking were performed with the following 17mer duplexes (Scheme 2), where X = 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine (dS4U). In these three systems (1·4, 2·4 and 3·4), the dS4U base was positioned opposite to a 2'-deoxyguanosine (dG) within a sequence derived from the T7 RNA polymerase promoter. We had used this system in the development of our cross-linking protocol, and the presence of three dG residues on the target strand proved optimal for the examination of sequence selectivity of cross-link formation.

Scheme 2.


Scheme 3.

Within the duplex 2·4, we observed essentially quantitative cross-link formation with the ortho-phenylenediamine system 6, presumably according to the following mechanism (Scheme 3).

This cross-linking reaction between duplexes 2 and 4 using the ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6 was completely selective for the complementary dG N7, and the reaction occurred in >95% yield over 12 h at 25°C. It was from this highly successful result that we embarked on the studies detailed herein.

Kinetics of cross-link formation

The time course of cross-linking reactions were monitored by both HPLC and denaturing PAGE. The derivatization of the dS4U containing strands 1, 2 and 3 with bis-electrophiles 6-11 proceeded to completion over the course of 1.5 h, as demonstrated by HPLC.

Upon addition of complimentary strand 5b to ortho-phenylenediamine 6-derivatized 5a (Scheme 4)under conditions conducive to hybridization, a new product with HPLC mobility intermediate between that of the two starting strands was formed. This is shown in Figure 1 for duplex 5a·5b with the ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6. After incubation of these two strands at 25°C overnight (data shown), the new peak corresponding to cross-linked material was the major product present.

Isolation of this material by HPLC, 5' end-labeling with 32P phosphate, and analysis by denaturing PAGE indicated that this new product was the cross-linked duplex. Alternatively, the cross-linked duplex could be purified using denaturing PAGE and then isolated by extraction from the appropriate gel slice. Maxam-Gilbert sequence analysis indicated that the alkylated base was at the complimentary dG.

In the course of optimizing cross-linking reactions, we examined the stability of the electrophilic strands to the reaction conditions. Strand 1 was alkylated with bis-electrophile 6, the S-alkylated product was isolated, and it was incubated under the conditions used in the cross-linking reaction. Aliquots were removed from the reaction mixture and the amount of active electrophile present was determined by derivatization with benzyl mercaptan. HPLC analysis allowed quantitation of the reacted and unreacted DNA, and this was used to calculate the rate at which the electrophilic strand was deactivated under our standard reaction conditions. These experiments indicate that the electrophilic strand generated using 6 had a half-life of ~72 h, and allowed us to feel confident that the lack of quantitative cross-link formation was not a result of non-competent electrophile. Stability studies were not performed with tethers other than 6.

Additional control studies were performed on the modified strand 1 derivatized with tether 6 in order to determine if a significant amount of intrastrand alkylation occurred. In these studies, oligomer 1 was 5' end-labeled and alkylated with 6, and the resulting product was incubated in the absence of complementary DNA under the standard reaction conditions. The sample was treated with piperidine (90°C) and analyzed by denaturing PAGE. No cleavage products were observed, indicating that self-alkylation did not occur at detectable levels.

Sequence selectivity

The sequence selectivity of the cross-link formation was shown to depend on both the duplex sequence in which the dS4U was incorporated and on the identity of the bis-electrophilic tether used in the cross-linking experiment. Cross-linking experiments were performed using duplex 1·4 (Scheme 5) where the dS4U is positioned complementary to the 3' end of the run of three dG residues (Fig. 2 ). In the case of tether 6, in addition to alkylation at the complimentary dG, significant reaction takes place at the dG two bases to the 5' side (lane 5). Alkylation at these two sites occurs in an ~1:1 ratio in >90% combined yield.


Scheme 4.


Scheme 5.

Experiments were conducted with the same sequences using the ethylenediamine-derived bis-electrophile 9. With the sequence 1·4, good yields of cross-linking were observed following alkylation of the dS4U of 2 with 9 (60%), and Maxam-Gilbert sequence analysis demonstrated that the reaction occurs almost totally at the dG two bases in the 5' direction, to the near exclusion of reaction at the dG complimentary to the derivatized dS4U (lane 4). Lengthening the tether as the meta-phenylenediamine derivative 8 abolished alkylation at the three dG residues closest to the dS4U residue, but permitted alkylation to occur in moderate yields at the dG four bases to the 5' side (lane 3). Not surprisingly, the para-phenylenediamine based tether 10 was ineffective in the cross-linking of 1·4 (data not shown).


Figure 1. HPLC trace of cross-linking reaction between 6-derivatized oligomer 5a and target strand 5b after 12 h at 25°C.


Figure 2. Denaturing PAGE of the cross-linking reaction between derivatized oligomer 1 and 32P end-labeled 4, after treatment with 1 M piperidine (95°C, 20 min). Lane 1: 32P 5' end-labeled target strand 4; lane 2: Maxam-Gilbert G-sequencing reaction; lane 3: cross-linking reaction with meta-phenylenediamine tether 8; lane 4: cross-linking reaction with ethylenediamine tether 9: lane 5: cross-linking reaction with ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6.

The result obtained with meta-phenylenediamine tether 8 within duplex 1·4 was unexpected and was not readily explained by examination of a computer generated model of this system. From such models, it was clear that the tether 8 was too short to form the experimentally observed cross-link without significantly distorting the B-DNA double helix. In practice, however, this system prefers this mode of alkylation over the proximal and apparently more accessible dG residues.

To further explore the topological features of the tether (Scheme 6) that are important for efficient cross-linking, we examined cross-linking in sequence 2·4 where the dS4U is positioned opposite the middle dG residue of the three-base run of dGs (Fig. 3 ). Sequence analysis of the cross-linking with ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6 demonstrated that this tether exclusively alkylated the complementary dG in excellent yields (lane 5). In contrast to duplex 2·4, ethylenediamine-based tether 9 alkylated the complementary dG in lower yield, and a small amount of alkylation was observed three bases in the 5' direction (lane 3). With the meta-phenylenediamine tether 8, a moderate yield of cross-linking was observed three bases in the 5' direction (lane 4). Experiments with 10 using the sequence 2·4 showed only very small amounts of cross-linking, which occurred exclusively at the dG three bases in the 5' direction. Additional experiments conducted with the very short hydrazine-derived tether 11 also showed low levels of cross-linking. Sequence analysis demonstrated that this reaction took place entirely at the complimentary dG.


Scheme 6.


Figure 3. Denaturing PAGE of the cross-linking reaction between derivatized oligomer 2 and 32P end-labeled 4, after treatment with 1 M piperidine (95°C, 20 min). Lane 1: 32P 5' end-labeled target strand 4; lane 2: Maxam-Gilbert G-sequencing reaction; lane 3: cross-linking reaction with ethylenediamine tether 9; lane 4: cross-linking reaction with meta-phenylenediamine tether 8: lane 5: cross-linking reaction with ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6.

Cross-linking in sequence 3·4 (Scheme 7) where the dS4U is positioned opposite the 3' end dG residue of the three-base run of dGs (Fig. 4 ) was significantly less effective, and poorly sequence selective. This was the only sequence where we observed cross-linking in the 3' direction. The meta-phenylenediamine tether 8 gave very low yields of cross-linking (<5%), and the ethylenediamine (9 ) and ortho-phenylenediamine (6 ) tethers effected cross-linking in <20 and 35%, respectively. This compares with the typical yields for cross-linking of 80-95% in the previously discussed sequences.

Kinetics


Scheme 7.


Figure 4. Denaturing PAGE of the cross-linking reaction between derivatized oligomer 3 and 32P end-labeled 4, after treatment with 1 M piperidine (95°C, 20 min). Lane 1: cross-linking reaction with meta-phenylenediamine tether 8; lane 2: cross-linking reaction with ethylenediamine tether 9; lane 3: cross-linking reaction with ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6; lane 4: Maxam-Gilbert G-sequencing reaction.Of the sequences investigated, duplex 2·4 underwent cross-linking most rapidly, with a half-life for reaction of slightly <1 h, when 2 was derivatized with bis-electrophile 6. Similarly, duplex 1·4 derivatized with 6 reacted rapidly to form cross-linked DNA. The half-life for this reaction was slightly >1.5 h. In contrast to this, sequence 3·4 derivatized with 6 reacted more slowly than the other sequences investigated. Kinetic analysis of the progress of this reaction demonstrated a half-life of almost 33 h. This implies that a higher degree of cross-linking could be obtained, compared to the 30% observed, by running the reaction for an extended period. However, a limitation of this is the half-life of the electrophilic strand in aqueous solution, which is just over two times the half-life for the reaction.

The rate of complimentary strand modification was measured with the sequence d(CXC)·(GGG) (duplex 1·4). These experiments were done in the presence of an excess of probe strand 1 that had been derivatized by electrophile 6, so that the reaction was pseudo-first order in 4. Under these conditions, kobs for the alkylation of 4 was found to be 1.1 × 10-4/sec. Using this value, along with the recently determined second-order rate constant for alkylation of DNA by bromoacetamide (34 ), an effective molarity of 3.1 M was calculated for the bromoacetyl group of 6 within the 1·4 duplex.


Scheme 8.

Thermal stability

UV melting (helix-coil transition) experiments were performed to evaluate the thermodynamic consequences of incorporating 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine and modified derivatives into duplex DNA. Cross-linking in these systems depends on three separate events: (i) effective duplex formation; (ii) appropriate tether topology and conformation; and (iii) complementary base nucleophilicity. We have examined factors (ii) and (iii) in the above cross-linking studies, but in order to understand the hybridization thermodynamics of the modified DNA and its complement, the stability of a series of duplex structures with various dS4U derivatives opposite a dG base were examined (Scheme 8). Non-electrophilic tethers (i.e., the desbromo systems) were appended by S-alkylation of dS4U within the 17mer sequences. In total, four thiouridine systems were examined in the complementary position to a dG base: the native dS4U system 2, the S-methyl derivative 2a, and the S-acetamido derivatives 2b and 2c (Scheme 9). This last system (2c) possesses all of the physical characteristics of the cross-linking system, but without the electrophilic [alpha]-bromoamide. This allowed us to estimate the thermodynamic destabilization caused by the presence of the bulky phenylenediamine system. In all cases, clear two-state melting curves were observed.


Scheme 9.


Scheme 10.

There was essentially no difference between the destabilization caused by 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine (2 ), or its S-methyl (2a) or S-acetamido (2b) derivatives (Table 1 ). All non-natural bases destabilized the duplex by ~9-10°C compared to the C·G control system, although when the bulky ortho-phenylenediamine derivative 2c was positioned opposite to a dG base, the destabilization was considerably greater. Concentration dependence experiments showed that the destabilization depended equally on enthalpic and entropic effects. The thermodynamic parameters derived from the concentration dependence of the Tm showed no obvious correlation between Tm of the duplexes and either [Delta]H or [Delta]S (35 ).

Table 1 . Duplex melting temperatures (°C)
Duplex Concentration of DNA (×107) (M)
  6 12 24 36 47 72
2·4 44.5 45.9 47.7 49.1 49.7 50.9
2a·4 44.2 45.6 46.4 47.3 47.6 49.3
2b·4 44.1 45.1 46.7 47.4 48.3 49.5
2c·4 41.9 42.3 44.6 44.9 45.4 47.1
C·G - - 56.9 - - -

The UV melting studies demonstrated that the dS4U·G (Scheme 10) mismatched base pair caused a decrease in the stability of the 17mer duplex of ~9°C in Tm. Reduced H-bonding coupled with the steric bulk of the R-groups could explain the similarly depressed Tm values for dRSU·dG containing duplexes.

In an attempt to determine the degree to which the interstrand cross-link stabilized the duplex, the cross-linked material was isolated by HPLC and UV melting studies were performed. Unfortunately, thermal depurination at the site of alkylation was rapid at temperatures >60°C, preventing the determination of Tm.

DISCUSSION

Effective covalent cross-linking of duplex DNA has been demonstrated by appending electrophilic tethers to 4-thio-2'-deoxyuridine (dS4U) contained within oligonucleotides; annealing these probes to their complementary strand induces covalent cross-link formation in a process driven by duplex formation. We have used a series of bis-bromoacetyldiamines as tethers, and we have demonstrated high yielding cross-link formation to deoxyguanosine bases on the complementary strand. We observed a significant sequence dependence of cross-link formation that was highly sensitive to tether topology and conformational rigidity. Under optimal conditions within the sequence d(CXC)·(GGG), where X = dS4U with an ortho-phenylenediamine based tether, we observed essentially quantitative cross-link formation (>95%) at the complementary dG N7 position. In other cases where the dS4U base was positioned opposite to other dG residues in the same sequence, we observed moderate to high yields of cross-link formation (40-80%), and sequence selectivity that was dependent on the tethering moiety.

Our observations of the selectivity of alkylation of dG residues is in general accord with literature data on the sequence preferences of alkylation at the N7 position of dG residues (36 -38 ). It is well Structure Block 10.established both experimentally and theoretically that a dG base 5' to another dG base intrinsically has enhanced nucleophilic character, supposedly due to an overlap of the filled HOMO with empty LUMO orbitals. In the present system, this implies that the central and 5' dG bases of the target sequence d(GGG) should be most readily alkylated, in the absence of overriding steric constraints.

In the sequence d(XCC)·(GGG) (duplex 1·4), the optimal ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6 was effective at formation of cross-links, although it was poorly sequence selective. Alkylation occurred at both the complementary dG and the dG two bases to the 5' side in approximately equal proportions. Modeling results indicated that both of these alkylation events could proceed without a significant distortion of either the tether or duplex DNA. The ethylenediamine tether 9 underwent alkylation almost exclusively at the dG two bases to the 5' side in good yield, but the meta-phenylenediamine tether 8 preferentially alkylated the distal dG four bases to the 5' side in good yield. This result was also observed with duplex 2·4 (vida infra).

In the sequence d(CXC)·(GGG) (duplex 2·4), we observed the most effective level of cross-link formation with ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6. Under optimized conditions over 12-24 h at 25°C we observed >= 95% cross-link formation, which occurred exclusively at the N7 position of the complementary dG. With the more flexible ethylenediamine tether 9, the amount of cross-linking was reduced, without a change in the sequence selectivity. With the meta-phenylenediamine tether 8, which was intended to be incapable of alkylating the complementary dG, we saw distal alkylation three bases to the 5' side. Computer generated models of this cross-link showed that tether 8 was just long enough to form this cross-link without distorting the DNA double helix.

In the sequence d(CCX)·(GGG) (duplex 3·4), only modest levels of cross-linking were observed at the indicated complementary dG even with the most effective ortho-phenylenediamine tether 6. This is partly due to the particular sequence in which the dG target is positioned, as we demonstrated previously that the C5-methyl group of the 5' thymidine sterically blocks alkylation at the adjacent 3' dG. Replacement of this thymine with a 2'-deoxyuridine residue was shown to result in enhanced cross-linking (30 ). In addition, based on electronic arguments this dG is significantly less nucleophilic than the other two dG residues.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM-47991). R.S.C. is the recipient of a Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation Distinguished New Faculty Award (1989-94), an American Cancer Society Junior Faculty Research Award (1990-93), the American Cyanamid Young Faculty Award (1993-96), and an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship (1995-97).

REFERENCES

1 Belikova, A. M., Zarytova, V. F. and Grineva, N. I. (1967) Tetrahedron Lett., 3557-3562. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Knorre, D. G. and Zarytova, V. F. (1991) Prospects for Antisense Nucleic Acid Therapy of Cancer and AIDS. Wiley-Liss, NY, pp. 195-218.

3 Knorre, D. G. and Vlassov, V. V. (1991) Genetica, 85, 53-63. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Knorre, D. G. and Vlassov, V. V. (1985) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 32, 291-320. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Vlassov, V. V., Zarytova, V. F., Kutiavin, I. V., Mamaev, S. V. and Podyminogin, M. A. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res., 14, 4065-4076. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Summerton, J. and Bartlett, P. A. (1978) J. Mol. Biol., 122, 145-162. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Webb, T. R. and Matteucci, M. D. (1986) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 108, 2764-2765.

8 Grant, K. B. and Dervan, P. B. (1996) Biochemistry, 35, 12313-12319. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Povsic, T. J., Strobel, S. A. and Dervan, P. B. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 5934-5941.

10 Povsic, T. J. and Dervan, P. B. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 9428-9430.

11 Kido, K., Inoue, H. and Ohtsuka, E. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res.,20, 1339-1341.> MEDLINE Abstract

12 Tabone, J. C., Stamm, M. R., Gamper, H. B. and Meyer, R. B., Jr (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 375-383. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Asseline, U., Thuong, N. T. and Helénè, C. (1997) New J. Chem., 21, 5-17.

14 O'Donnell, M. and McLaughlin, L. W. (1996) in Hecht, S. (ed.), Bioorganic Chemistry: Nucleic Acids. Oxford University Press, pp. 216-243.

15 Goodchild, J. (1990) Bioconjugate Chem., 1, 165-187.

16 Englisch, U. and Gauss, D. H. (1991) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 30, 612-629.

17 Uhlmann, E. and Peyman, A. (1990) Chem. Rev., 90, 543-584.

18 Xu, Y.-Z. (1996) Tetrahedron, 52, 10737-10750.

19 Kuimelis, R. G. and Nambiar, K. P. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 1429-1436. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Milton, J., Connolly, B. A., Nikiforov, T. T. and Cosstick, R. (1993) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 779. Nikiforov, T. T. and Connolly, B. A. (1992) Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 2379.

21 Clivio, P., Fourrey, J.-L., Gasche, J., Audic, A., Favre, A., Perrin, C. and Woisard, A. (1992) Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 65-68.

22 Rao, T. S., Jayaraman, K., Durland, R. H. and Revankar, G. R. (1992) Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 7651.

23 Xu, Y.-Z., Zheng, Q. and Swann, P. F. (1992) Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 5837-5840.

24 Adams, C. J., Murray, J. B., Arnold, J. R. P. and Stockley, P. G. (1994) Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 765-768.

25 Adams, C. J., Farrow, M. A., Murray, J. B., Kelly, S. M., Price, N. C. and Stockley, P. G. (1995) Tetrahedron Lett., 36, 4637.

26 Adams, C. J., Murray, J. B., Farrow, M. A., Arnold, J. R. P. and Stockley, P. G. (1995) Tetrahedron Lett., 36, 5421.

27 Coleman, R. S. and Siedlecki, J. M. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc.,114, 9229-9230.

28 Coleman, R. S. and Kesicki, E. A. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 11636-11642.

29 Coleman, R. S., Arthur, J. C. and McCary, J. L. (1997) Tetrahedron, 57, 11191-11202.

30 Coleman, R. S. and Kesicki, E. A. (1995) J. Org. Chem., 60, 6252-6253.

31 Coleman, R. S. and Siedlecki, J. M. (1991) Tetrahedron Lett.,32, 3033-3034.

32 Eadie, J. S., McBride, L. J., Efcavitch, J. W., Hoff, L. B. and Cathcart, R. (1987) Anal. Biochem., 165, 442-447. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Maxam, A. M. and Gilbert, W. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 560-564. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Taylor, M. J. and Dervan, P. B. (1997) Bioconjugate Chem., 8, 354-364.

35 Marky, L. A. and Breslauer, K. J. (1987) Biopolymers, 26, 1601-1620. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Sugiyama, H. and Saito, I. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 7063-7068.

37 Kohn, K. W., Hartley, J. A. and Mattes, W. B. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 10531-10549. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Mattes, W. B., Hartley, J. A. and Kohn, K. W. (1986) Nucleic Acids. Res., 14, 2971-2987. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 614 292 4548; Fax: +1 614 292 4647; Email: coleman.184@osu.edu
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Gao and L. E. Orgel
Nucleic acid duplexes incorporating a dissociable covalent base pair
PNAS, December 21, 1999; 96(26): 14837 - 14842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (132K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pires, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Pires, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?