Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (147K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bobb, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bobb, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 641-647

Footnote

Conserved RY-repeats mediate transactivation of seed-specific promoters by the developmental regulator PvALF

Conserved RY-repeats mediate transactivation of seed-specific promoters by the developmental regulator PvALF Andrew J. Bobb + , Maw-Shenq Chern and Mauricio M. Bustos*

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore , MD 21250, USA

Received August 30, 1996; Revised and Accepted December 3, 1996

ABSTRACT

Transcription of genes DLEC2 and PHS [beta] is specifically and coordinately regulated during maturation of Phaseolus embryos. Over-expression of the seed- specific factor PvALF in cotyledon cells results in transactivation of either promoter. PvALF is related to the VP1 protein of maize, which transactivates gene expression via G-boxes, Sph elements and AT-rich sequences. We used deletions and base substitutions in the DLEC2 and PHS [beta] promoters to demonstrate that several conserved RY-repeats were necessary for PvALF induction of both genes. A comprehensive mutational and transactivation analysis was used to define functionally the sequence of the DLEC2 repeat RY3 as G / C CATGCxx G / C . We also found that an interaction between RY3 and the 3 '-flanking tetranucleotide CCAC increased PvALF transactivation. A preferred spacing and phasing requirement for the RY3 and CCAC motifs suggested the possibility of interactions between cellular factors that recognize either element. The high conservation of Sph-RY motifs in seed-specific promoters from monocots and dicots indicates that organ and temporal specification by factors similar to VP1 and PvALF is common among seed plants.

INTRODUCTION

At the end of embryonic morphogenesis, higher plant embryos initiate a process of maturation characterized by the accumulation of protein, lipid and carbohydrate reserves, which is followed by the establishment of desiccation tolerance late in embryogenesis. Viviparous mutations vp1 and abi3 in maize and Arabidopsis , respectively, disrupt normal induction of mat uration ( MAT ) and l ate e mbryogenesis a bundant ( LEA ) genes, resulting in reduced storage protein synthesis and increased rate of vivipary in maize ( 1 - 5 ), and Arabidopsis ( 6 - 8 ), and altered pigmentation in maize ( 1 - 5 ). Therefore, VP1 and ABI3 genes encode functions critical to the normal development of higher plant embryos.

Genes of VP1/ABI3-like factors have been cloned from maize ( VP1 , 9 ), rice ( OsVP1 , 10 ), Arabidopsis thaliana ( ABI3 , 11 ) and Phaseolus ( PvALF , 12 ). VP1 was isolated first and it is considered as the prototype for the group. Although VP1 and PvALF share only 38% overall identity at the amino acid level ( 12 ) they are both transcription activators ( 5 , 9 , 12 , 13 ), and contain similar N-terminal, acidic segments that function as a transferable transcription activation domains in yeast and plant cells ( 9 , 12 ). Because VP1 and PvALF lack typical DNA binding domains, they probably activate transcription in combination with other factors, including DNA binding proteins. Analyses of transactivation of Em and C1 promoters by VP1 ( 5 , 13 , 14 ) have indicated a general requirement for three types of cis -acting DNA elements: G-boxes, originally described as recognition sequences for basic-leucine/zipper (bZIP) proteins and for certain types of bHLH proteins (reviewed in 15 ), an Sph element ( 5 ), and A/T-rich sequences ( 14 ). VP1 transactivates ABA-dependent Em expression via G-box complex I, and ABA-independent expression via different sequences which include the A/T-rich motifs and the Sph element ( 14 ). The latter is similar to the RY-repeats which were described first in genes DLEC1 and DLEC2 encoding the two subunits of seed phytohemagglutinin from Phaseolus vulgaris ( 16 ). Subsequently, identical or very similar motifs were found upstream of many seed-specific genes from legumes and other dicots ( 17 ). Mutational analyses in tobacco demonstrated that the RY-repeats of legumin, glycinin and [beta]-conglycinin genes are necessary for positive regulation in seed tissues ( 18 - 21 ), and negative regulation in vegetative organs ( 18 , 22 ). However, precise determinations of the nucleotides essential for positive or negative transcriptional regulation, or the relations between the RY-repeat and other promoter DNA signals or cellular trans -acting factors remain largely unknown.

Previously, we reported that the seed-specific regulator PvALF transactivates the promoters of genes DLEC2 and PHS [beta], which are coordinately induced at the beginning of seed maturation ( 12 ). As a step towards addressing the molecular interactions underlying PvALF transactivation, we have elucidated the structure of a PvALF response complex. Our analysis revealed that some, although not all RY-repeats of genes DLEC2 and PHS [beta] are necessary and sufficient for PvALF transactivation. Moreover, an interaction between the RY-repeat and a neighboring CCAC-box in the DLEC2 promoter enhances gene expression in response to PvALF. Preferred spacing and phase (angular position around a B-DNA helix) requirements for this interaction suggest the presence of a multiprotein complex associated with the RY/CCAC-box operator. These results constitute the first published demonstration of a functional link between the RY-repeats of dicot storage protein genes and a cloned transcription factor, and pave the way for further characterization of VP1/ABI3 regulatory pathways in legumes and other dicots such as soybean, tobacco, Brassica and Arabidopsis .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutagenesis and plasmid construction

Promoter fragments -295PHS, -120PHS, -230DLEC2, -133DLEC2 and MPHA were amplified by 30 cycles of PCR (94oC, 1 min; 50oC, 1 min; 72oC, 1 min) from wild-type [beta]-phaseolin ( PHS [beta]) or phytohemagglutinin L-subunit ( DLEC2 ) promoters using synthetic oligonucleotide primers. Mutations near the 5'-ends of the MPHA and -133DLEC2 fragment were introduced into the 5' amplification primer. For internal mutations, two partially overlapping oligonucleotides containing each mutation were prepared, and used as upstream and downstream primers in separate PCR reactions with wild type 5'- and 3'-end primers. The products of PCR were separated from unincorporated primers in a 2% agarose gel, eluted from a gel slice by overnight diffusion at room temperature in TE buffer, and combined in a primerless PCR reaction for 5 cycles. The full length mutant promoter was then produced by adding 5'- and 3'-terminal primers followed by 20 cycles of amplification. In all cases, the final promoter fragment was phenol and chloroform extracted, EtOH precipitated, and digested overnight with restriction enzymes; the restriction product was gel purified, eluted and cloned into an expression vector containing the uidA gene encoding [beta]-glucuronidase. Restriction sites for Eco RI and Xba I were added to the ends of the MPHA fragments used in Figures 2 and 3 (wild type sequence is ggaatt C ACCATGCATGCTGCCACCTCAGCTCCCGCCTCTTCACCGTGTCTTTCTCTagagc, where lowercase represents added nucleotides) for cloning upstream of a -64 cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter fragment driving the uidA reporter gene; all other promoters were cloned into pBI221 (Clontech, San Francisco, CA) between sites for Hin dIII and Xba I. All promoters were sequenced once cloned into the expression vector.

Particle bombardment and enzyme assays

Leaves were collected from greenhouse-grown Phaseolus vulgaris cv `Tendergreen' plants, and surface sterilized in 20% bleach for 45 s. The leaves were thoroughly rinsed in sterile water, and circular sections removed with a sterilized 1' cork borer. Leaf disks were placed on Gamborg's B5 medium (BRL, Bethesda, MD) pH 5.7, supplemented with mannitol (0.75 M), and 5 mM each proline and glutamine, and solidified with 0.8% Bacto-agar (Difco, Detroit, MI). Leaf disks were incubated for >= 2 h prior to bombardment. Tungsten particles (average diameter ~1.3 micron; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) were washed three times with ethanol by sonicating 30 s to suspend particles, and centrifuged 20 s, then washed twice with sterile water. A total of 3.75 [mu]g DNA in 37.5 [mu]l water was precipitated onto 3.75 mg prepared tungsten particles in 150 [mu]l water by the addition of 150 [mu]l 2.5 M CaCl 2 , 60 [mu]l 0.1 M spermidine with continuous vortexing. The mixture was vortexed 3 min and the particles collected by centrifugation. The pellet was washed with 700 [mu]l 100% ethanol and resuspended in 60 [mu]l 100% ethanol, of which 10 [mu]l was used per bombardment. Bombardments were performed at 1550 p.s.i., 28 inches Hg vacuum in a Bio-Rad Biolistic particle delivery system. After bombardment, leaf disks were incubated overnight at 26oC in darkness.


Figure 1 . RY-repeats are necessary for PvALF transactivation of promoter DLEC2 . ( A ) The diagram illustrates the DLEC2:uidA reporter gene, showing the relative locations of 5' deletion end-points -230 and -133, and three canonical RY-repeats (CATGCATG) marked with numbered ovals. ( B ) Transactivation assays in Phaseolus cotyledons collected 18-20 days after flowering. Reporter genes are indicated on the left. In constructs -133RY2m, -133RY3m and -133RY2,3m the sequences of motifs RY2 and RY3 were mutated from CATGCATG to CgTctAgG. The ratio of GUS activity (pmol 4-methylumbelliferone/h) to luciferase activity (LUC m = 10 -5 * relative light units) in each sample was measured 18-24 h after DNA bombardment. Shaded bars represent the average GUS/LUCm values in samples cobombarded with the PvALF expression plasmid pALF. Clear bars indicate cobombardments with a control plasmid that lacks the PvALF cDNA. Error bars equal the standard error of the mean of four measurements ( n = 4). Numbers in boldface type indicate the fold induction. uidA :[beta]-glucuronidase gene from Escherichia coli . ( C ) Transactivation of DLEC2:uidA reporter genes in Phaseolus leaves.

Three types of plasmid construct were used: reporters containing a promoter fragment fused to the uidA gene encoding [beta]-glucuronidase (GUS); pALF effector, containing a full-length PvALF cDNA driven by the CaMV 35S (-900/+6) promoter ( 12 ), or control pJIT effector (derived from pJIT82) lacking the PvALF cDNA sequence; and internal reference plasmid, containing the firefly luciferase cDNA, also under the control of the (-900/+6) CaMV 35S promoter. All assays contained reporter, effector and reference plasmids in a 1:1:0.5 ratio.

Leaf disks were ground in 400 [mu]l grinding buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 1 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.1% Triton X-100) using an ice-cold mortar and pestle. Luciferase activity was measured from 20 [mu]l extract in a Berthold luminometer (Berthold, Germany) using a stabilized luciferase assay reagent (Promega, Madison, WI). GUS activity was measured from 50 [mu]l extract according to the method of Jefferson (1987). Results are expressed in GUS/LUCm units (GUS activity/luciferase activity * 10 5 ). Cotyledon bombardment assays were performed as described previously ( 23 ).

RESULTS

RY-repeats mediate PvALF transactivation of genes DLEC2 and PHS [beta]

A -230 DLEC2 promoter that directs seed-specific expression of phytohemagglutinin in transgenic tobacco ( 24 ) is transactivated by PvALF in Phaseolus cotyledons ( 12 ). The importance of three RY-repeats shown in Figure 1 A for transactivation was investigated by the particle bombardment technique described previously ( 23 ). GUS activity was measured 24 h after bombardment with reporter DNA, plus PvALF expression plasmid pALF ( 12 ), or a control plasmid lacking a PvALF coding sequence (pJIT), and the ratio of GUS to luciferase activity (GUS/LUCm) was used as a relative measure of gene expression. Throughout this article, GUS expression in the absence of the PvALF effector gene is referred to as `endogenous expression', and is represented by clear bars; `activated expression' designates the amount of GUS activity in samples containing pALF, and is represented by shaded bars; `induction' indicates the increase in GUS activity resulting from over-expression of PvALF, and is calculated as the ratio of activated versus endogenous expression.


Figure 2 . Transactivation of the phaseolin PHS [beta] :uidA reporter gene in Phaseolus leaves. ( A ) Diagram of reporter gene -295PHS containing the seed-specific phaseolin promoter fragment (25). Shown is the deletion end-point of construct -120PHS at position -120, and two RY-repeats, RY1 and RY2. ( B ) Transactivation assays. Reporter genes are indicated on the left. In construct -295RY1m, the RY1 motif CATGCAAA was mutated to CgTctAgA. Construct -295RY1,2m contains a second mutation at motif RY2 from CATGCATG to CgTctAgA. Other details are as described in the legend to Figure 1.


Figure 3 . Single base mutational analysis of a proximal PvALF response complex from gene DLEC2 . ( A ) Fragment MPHA (nucleotides -115 and -65) of the DLEC2 promoter was fused to a heterologous CaMV 35S (-64/+6) promoter. Twenty nucleotides (double-headed arrow) spanning repeat RY3 were mutated individually using synthetic DNA primers and PCR (Materials and Methods). (B), (C) and (D) show the results of PvALF transactivation assays as described in the legend to Figure 1. The sequence of wild-type DNA, the position of each nucleotide (position #) and the nucleotides to which they were changed (mutation) are indicated under each set of bars. GUS/LUC m units are the same as in Figure 1. Clear bars, reporter plus control pJIT plasmid; shaded bars, reporter plus PvALF effector plasmid. Numbers in boldface type indicate fold induction. ( B ) Transition mutations at positions 1-20; ( C ) transversion mutations in the RY repeat (positions 2-7); ( D ) transversion mutations in the CCAC-box (positions 13-18).


Figure 1 B shows the results of transactivation assays in immature Phaseolus cotyledons. Inclusion of the PvALF effector induced GUS expression 6-fold. A deletion of the DLEC2 promoter to position -133 (reporter -133DLEC2) caused a 10-fold reduction in endogenous expression and ~7-fold reduction in activated expression. However, PvALF induction of construct -133DLEC2 was higher (10-fold) than that of -230DLEC2, indicating that sequences downstream of position -134 were sufficient for PvALF transactivation. The contributions of repeats RY2 and RY3 to transactivation of the -133DLEC2 promoter were assessed by creating linker replacement mutations in either or both motifs. Mutant promoter -133RY2m yielded the same amount of induction as the intact -133DLEC2 control. In contrast, transactivation of promoter -133RY3m was 4-fold, and when both mutations were combined in promoter -RY2,3m, only 3-fold induction was observed.

Although expression of PvALF mRNA in Phaseolus leaves or other non-embryonic organs falls below the threshold for detection by RNA blot hybridization, ectopic over-expression of recombinant PvALF in leaf tissues activates the DLEC2 reporter gene, indicating that leaf mesophyll cells can support PvALF function ( 12 ). Consequently, transactivation experiments were also performed in leaf disks, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 1 C. Unlike the cotyledons, leaves produced no difference in the endogenous activities of reporters -230DLEC2 and -133DLEC2, suggesting that the -230 to -134 region contains a cotyledon-specific enhancer. That result was consistent with data from Riggs et al . ( 24 ), who reported a significant loss of phytohemagglutinin-L expression in tobacco upon the deletion of sequences comprised between nucleotides -330 and -110, relative to the start of transcription. Still, constructs -230DLEC2 and -133DLEC2 were induced by the same amount in leaves as -133DLEC2 was in cotyledons, and mutations of motifs RY2 and RY3 had the same effects in leaf and cotyledons.

The data contained in Figure 1 B and C convey two important messages. The RY-repeat that is located closest to the TATA-box (RY3) appears to command most of the PvALF transactivation of promoter DLEC2 . In addition to the PvALF response element present in the -133DLEC2 promoter, the -230/-134 region contains a second element for positive regulation which functions specifically in cotyledons. It remains to be determined whether the activity of the -230/-134 sequence reflects, at least in part, activation by endogenous PvALF present in the cotyledons.

The -295 promoter (-295PHS) of phaseolin gene PHS [beta], is sufficient to direct seed-specific expression in tobacco ( 25 ). This -295PHS promoter was incorporated into a PHS [beta] :uidA fusion construct and shown to be transactivated by PvALF in Phaseolus cotyledons ( 12 ). Figure 2 A depicts the locations of two RY-repeats, RY1 and RY2, present in the -295PHS promoter. The relevance of these motifs for PvALF induction was assessed using leaf bombardment assays. Deletion of nucleotides -295 to -121 in promoter -120PHS, caused a significant reduction in PvALF induction (6-fold versus 13-fold). A similar reduction followed the mutation of motif RY1 (-295RY1m). Moreover, a second mutation in motif RY2 (-295RY1,2m), caused an even lower level of activation, 3-fold, indicating that both RY repeats were necessary for PvALF transactivation of the -295PHS promoter.

Functional definition of the RY-repeat as a PvALF response element

The canonical RY-repeat octamer CATGCATG ( 16 ) is a consensus deduced from natural DNA sequences ( 17 ) rather than the result of direct functional tests or protein-DNA binding assays. Like the experiments of the previous section, mutational studies of RY-repeats have typically involved mutation (deletion, insertion or substitution) of several nucleotides at a time ( 5 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 18 - 21 , 26 ). Moreover, the different relative importance of individual RY-repeats for PvALF transactivation.

According to Figure 1 A and B, motif RY3 makes a large contribution to the transactivation of promoter DLEC2 . In order to address future questions concerning protein contacts with specific base pairs of this motif, and the role of its sequence context on PvALF transactivation, a 50 bp fragment from the DLEC2 promoter (nucleotides -115 to -65, fragment MPHA) was fused to a heterologous minimal promoter, -6435S. The resulting construct MPHA/35S is illustrated in Figure 3 A; Figure 3 B (bars labeled -6435S and MPHA/35S) shows that the level of PvALF induction increased significantly with the inclusion of fragment MPHA. Subsequently, single-base mutations (purine-to-purine or pyrimidine-to-pyrimidine) were engineered at 20 positions indicated with a double-headed arrow in Figure 3 A, including and flanking motif RY3. The corresponding amounts of endogenous and activated expression measured from each mutant promoter, and the level of induction, are displayed in Figure 3 B. Individual nucleotides, their relative position and the mutations are shown under the graph. Mutations within repeat RY3 at positions 3-7 and 10, decreased the level of induction 50% or more. Promoters carrying mutations at the first two bases of repeat RY3 (positions 3 and 4) also showed slight increases in the amounts of endogenous expression. These results tentatively defined the pentanucleotide CATGC as the core of repeat RY3. Additionally, mutations in the tetranucleotide CCAC located downstream of repeat RY3 (positions 14-17), also reduced induction ~50%. In particular, the mutations at positions 15 and 16 caused significant reductions in both endogenous and activated expression.


Figure 4 . Multiple copies of the RY-repeat confer PvALF transactivation upon a minimal CaMV 35S promoter. ( A ) Synthetic, double-stranded DNA molecules containing 1, 2 and 3 copies of repeat RY3 were cloned upstream of the heterologous CaMV 35S promoter (-64/+6) in plasmid -6435S, yielding the reporter constructs 1*RY/35S, 2*RY/35S and 3*RY/35S, respectively. ( B ) Results of PvALF transactivation assays carried out as described the legend to Figure 1.

Motif RY3 and the CCAC tetranucleotide were probed further by mutating positions 2-7 and 13-18 to complementary bases (a type of transversion mutation). Figure 3 C shows that mutations at positions 3, 5, 6 and 7, in the RY3 repeat, reduced the level of induction 50% or more. Figure 3 D shows that transversions in the CCAC element (positions 13-18) had more varied effects on PvALF transactivation: mutations G13C and C14G had little effect on the level of induction, mutation C15G caused a similar decrease in induction as C15T (Fig. 3 C), and mutations A16T, C17G and C18G had opposite effects on the level of induction to the corresponding transition mutations A16G, C17T and C18T. The data demonstrate a requirement for the CATGC pentanucleotide core of motif RY3, with an additional contribution from the CCAC motif. Interestingly, mutant promoters with CCtC or CCAg yielded higher levels of induction than the wild-type containing CCAC. Additionally, it is clear that certain nucleotides, or base pairs, functioned better than others at some positions between the RY-repeat and the CCAC-box, or on either side of the RY/CCAC-box complex. For instance, a G . C pair yielded higher levels of induction than an A . T pair at positions 2, 10, 14 and 17. Several constructs containing selected mutations on the apparently more critical portions of the RY and CCAC motifs were tested by particle bombardment in immature bean cotyledons as in Figure 1 B. Results from these experiments were very similar or identical to those obtained with leaves (data not shown). Therefore, nucleotides near the RY and CCAC-box motifs appear to modulate the function of the RY/CB complex, possibly by stabilizing protein-DNA contacts or by affecting DNA conformation.

Multiple copies of the RY-repeat confer PvALF transactivation upon a minimal promoter

The sufficiency of the RY-repeat for PvALF transactivation was tested by fusing synthetic DNA fragments containing one to three copies of the RY-repeat to the minimal -6435S promoter, as depicted in Figure 4 A. Plasmid MPHA/35S was used as a positive control, respectively. Figure 4 B shows that a single copy of the RY-repeat in construct 1RY/35S yielded a slight increase in the amounts of endogenous and activated expression, and in the level of induction (4*) relative to the negative control -6435S promoter (1*-2*, data not shown). However, both activated expression and the level of induction increased significantly with two and three copies (2RY/35S and 3RY/35S), indicating that multimers of the RY-repeat can direct PvALF transactivation in the absence of a CCAC-box.

Preferred spacing and phase requirements govern PvALF transactivation by the RY3/CCAC-box complex

Due to the rigidity of double-stranded DNA helices over short spans of <60-100 bp, interactions among protein factors bound to DNA can be greatly influenced by the position of their corresponding binding sites on the surface of the DNA helix ( 27 ). A similar situation could apply to the RY3/CCAC-box complex where the cores of repeat RY3 and the CCAC-box are separated by one turn of B-DNA helix. An effort was made to test the range of distances and phase angles that are compatible with PvALF transactivation from this complex. Consequently, 2, 5, 7 or 10 bp were moved from a location 22 bp upstream of motif RY3, and inserted between nucleotides T12 and G13 (Fig. 3 ) that separate the RY3 repeat from the CCAC-box. A standard B-DNA value of 34.5o per base pair ( 28 ) yields calculated phase shifts of approximately 70, 170, 245, and 345 degrees, respectively. The resulting mutant promoters RY+2 to RY+10 are depicted in Figure 5 A. In these promoters, the distance and phase angles between the RY3 motif and the TATA-box have also been changed. In order to control for those changes, and for the effect of moving the spacer element to a different location within the promoter, the same sequences were inserted downstream of the CCAC-box (constructs RY/CB+2 to RY/CB+10). Both series of mutant promoters were tested in leaf transactivation assays and the corresponding results are displayed in Figure 5 B and C. Figure 5 B shows that all the insertions between RY3 and the CCAC-box (RY+2 to RY+10) caused significant reductions in activated expression and level of induction. In particular, promoters RY+2 and RY+7 yielded very low levels of induction (2- and 3-fold, respectively), similar to the -6435S minimal promoter. Transactivation was partially restored, however, in promoter RY+10 to 7-fold, corresponding to 70% of the amount seen with the intact WT promoter. All the control promoters (RY/CB+2 to RY/CB+10) displayed comparable levels of induction, which were also very similar to the wild-type (Fig. 4 B). Although these results resemble those from analogous `phasing' experiments which have been performed with other systems, without testing a large number of permutations of the spacer sequence(s) it is difficult to completely rule out that changes in gene expression simply reflect the creation of new, transcriptionally active signals (either positive or negative). Therefore, while individual base pairs between repeat RY3 and the CCAC-box, e.g. at nucleotides T12 and G13, can be changed without causing much detriment to PvALF transactivation, altering the spacing and phase angle between the two elements can seriously impair PvALF induction. However, the activity of the operator is partially restored by introducing a full helical turn (~10 bp) between repeat RY3 and the CCAC-box, suggesting that PvALF transactivation favors a configuration that has these two components of the complex on approximately the same side of DNA helix.


Figure 5 . PvALF transactivation is affected by the spacing and phase between the RY-repeat and the CCAC-box. ( A ) Diagram illustrating mutated DLEC2 promoters RY+2 to RY+10 in which 2, 5, 7 and 10 nt were moved from a location 22 bp upstream of repeat RY3, to a site between RY3 and the CCAC-box (CB). Control promoters RY/CB+2 to RY/CB+10 in which the same sequences were moved to a point downstream of the CCAC-box. ( B ) Transactivation of constructs RY+2 to RY+10. ( C ) Transactivation of constructs RY/CB+2 to RY/CB+10. Units and other details of the graphs are described in the legend to Figure 1.

DISCUSSION

RY-repeats and transcription activation by VP1/ABI3-like factors in dicots

Analyzing the promoter elements involved in PvALF transactivation was a crucial step towards understanding the mode of action of this regulator. Figure 6 depicts the main conclusions of this study. We provide the first experimental evidence linking the conserved RY-repeats of dicot storage protein genes to a cloned transcription activator, in this case PvALF, a member of a more general family of seed transcription factors first identified in monocots. The relationship between PvALF and the RY-repeats was suggested by the demonstration that VP1 transactivation of monocot C1 and Em promoters involved similar motifs, known as Sph elements ( 5 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 ). Although the nucleotide sequences of the DLEC2 RY-repeats RY1, RY2 and RY3 are identical one to another, mutations in each motif caused different changes in PvALF transactivation. We show that the higher activity of repeat RY3 is due, at least in part, to its proximity and spatial orientation relative to a CCAC-box. A CCAC tetranucleotide is also present within the Coupling Element 1 (CE1), a cis -acting element involved in abscisic acid (ABA) regulation of the Hva22 gene from barley ( 29 ). Not surprisingly, the CCAC-box occurs frequently on many plant promoters active in seed and non-seed tissues (M. Bustos, unpublished). By contrast, RY-repeats have been found almost exclusively upstream of dicot genes for storage proteins, lectins and oil-body proteins that are specifically expressed in the seed ( 17 ). It is important to note that the published sequence of the ABI3-regulated At2S3 gene promoter of Arabidopsis ( 8 , 30 ) includes an RY/CB complex within 60 bp upstream of the TATA box, indicating that ABI3 also regulates RY-containing genes in that species. Very recently, Kao et al . ( 31 ) reported that an Sph element, which is very similar to the RY-repeats of dicot storage protein genes, is necessary for transactivation of the C1 promoter of maize by VP1. Thus, the parallels between ABI3 and VP1 and their corresponding operators, i.e. RY and Sph elements, indicate a rather high degree of conservation in the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of VP1/ABI3 proteins in higher plants.


Figure 6 . Upstream DNA elements for positive regulation of DLEC2 transcription in cotyledons. Shown are PvALF transactivation mediated by the RY3/CB operator complex, and activation by unidentified factor(s) via the -230/-134 domain.

Interactions between DNA signals specific for cell or organ identity, hormones or environmental stimuli, and DNA sequences conveying more structural or metabolic information are at the core of many gene regulatory mechanisms from plants and other eukaryotes with complex development. An RY binding activity has been reported in nuclear extracts from Brassica napus embryos ( 32 ), and we have obtained similar results with nuclear extracts from bean embryos (Bustos,M.M. and Bobb,A.J., unpublished data). Future work on the PvALF/RY transactivation system should concentrate on the isolation and cloning of the RY binding protein (RYBP) of Phaseolus embryos. With regards to their possible role in transactivation, we envision the RYBPs as being analogous to the ubiquitous mammalian Oct-1 factor; this protein binds to the octamer motif ATGCAAAT ( 33 ) and interacts with other transcription activators, some which are incapable of binding independently to DNA in a sequence specific manner, such as the viral acidic transactivator VP16 ( 34 ). The presence of RYBPs in leaves and other non-seed organs could also serve to repress transcription from RY-containing promoters in tissues where VP1/ABI3-like factors are not present.

Unlike the evidence pointing to the existence of RY binding proteins in Brassica and bean embryos, there is no similar information on a possible DNA binding activity that interacts specifically with the CCAC-box. As with some mutations on the RY-repeat, the deleterious effects of CCAC mutations on transcription could be due to altered DNA conformation. In conclusion, the work presented here sheds new light on a long standing question concerning the activation pathway(s) associated with conserved RY-repeats of dicot seed-specific genes, and is likely to facilitate the isolation of previously unknown regulatory factors important for seed and plant development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr Donald Helinski (UCSD, La Jolla) for the gift of expression vector pJIT82, Dr Carol Greitner for expert maintenance of plant materials. This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (MCB-9219203) and the US Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative (No. 9303090) to M.M.B. M.-S.C. and A.J.B. were the recipients of Special Research Initiative Support/Graduate Research Assistantships from the University of Maryland Graduate School, Baltimore.

REFERENCES

1 Robertson,D.S. (1955) Genetics, 40, 745-760.

2 Neill,S., Horgan,J.R. and Rees,A.F. (1987) Planta, 171, 358-364.

3 McCarty,D.R., Carson,C.B., Lazar,M. and Simonds,S.C. (1989) Dev. Genet., 10, 473-481.

4 Kriz,A.R., Wallace,M.S. and Paiva,R. (1990) Plant Physiol., 92, 538-542.

5 Hattori,T., Vasil,V., Rosenkrans,L., Hannah,L.C. and McCarty,D.R. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 609-618. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Finkelstein,R.R. and Sommerville,C.R. (1990) Plant Physiol., 94, 1172-1179.

7 Nambara,E., Naito,S. and McCourt,P. (1992) Plant J., 2, 435-441.

8 Parcy,F., Valon,C., Raynal,M., Gaubier-Comella,P., Delseny,M. and Giraudat,J. (1994) Plant Cell, 6, 1567-1582. MEDLINE Abstract

9 McCarty,D.R., Hattori,T., Carson,C.B., Vasil,V., Lazar,M. and Vasil,I.K. (1991) Cell, 66, 895-905. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Hattori,T., Terada,T. and Hamasuna,S. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol., 24, 805-810. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Giraudat,J., Hauge,B.M., Valon,C., Smalle,J., Parcy,F. and Goodman,H.M. (1992) Plant Cell, 4, 1251-1261. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Bobb,A.J., Eiben,H.G. and Bustos,M.M. (1995) Plant J., 8, 331-343. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Hattori,T., Terada,T. and Hamsuna,S. (1995) Plant J., 7, 913-925. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Vasil,V., Marcotte,W.R., Jr,, Rosenkrans,L., Cocciolone,S.M., Vasil,I.K., Quatrano,R.S. and McCarty,D.R. (1995) Plant Cell, 7, 1511-1518. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Thomas,T. (1993) Plant Cell, 5, 1401-1410. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Hoffman,L.M. and Donaldson,D.D. (1985) EMBO J., 4, 883-889. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Dickinson,C.D., Evans,R.P. and Nielsen,N.C. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 371. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Bäumlein,H., Nagy,I., Villarroel,R., Inze,D. and Wobus,U. (1992) Plant J., 2, 233-239.

19 Chamberland,S., Daigle,N. and Bernier,F. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol., 19, 937-949. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Lelievre,J.-M., Oliveira,L.O. and Nielsen,N. (1992) Plant Physiol., 98, 387-391.

21 Fujiwara,T. and Beachy,R.N. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol., 24, 261-272. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Forster,C., Arthur,E., Crespi,S., Hobbs,S.L.A., Mullineaux,P. and Casey,R. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol., 26, 235-248. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Chern,M.-S., Bobb,A.J. and Bustos,M.M. (1996) Plant Cell, 8, 305-321. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Riggs,C.D., Voelker,T.A. and Chrispeels,M.J. (1989) Plant Cell, 1, 609-621. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Bustos,M.M., Begum,D., Kalkan,F., Battraw,M.J. and Hall,T.C. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 1469-1479. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Fiedler,U., Filistein,R., Wobus,U. and Bäumlein,H. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol., 22, 669-679. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Tjian,R. and Maniatis,T. (1994) Cell, 77, 5-8. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Dickerson,R.E., Drew,H.R., Conner,B.N., Wing,R.M., Fratini,A.U. and Kopka,M.L. (1982) Science, 216, 475-485. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Shen,Q. and Ho,T.-H.D. (1995) Plant Cell, 7, 295-307. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Conceicao da Silva,A. and Krebbers,E. (1994) Plant J., 5, 493-505.

31 Kao,C.-Y., Cocciolone,S.M., Vasil,I.K. and McCarty,D.R. (1996) Plant Cell, 8, 1171-1179. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Sjodahl,S., Gustavsson,H.-O., Rodin,J. and Rask,L. (1995) Planta, 197, 264-271. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Sturm,R.A. and Herr,W. (1988) Nature, 336, 601-604. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Cleary,M.A., Stern,S., Tanaka,M. and Herr,W. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 72-83. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 410 455 2769; Fax: +1 410 455 3875; Email: bustos@umbc.edu

+ Present address: Department of Biochemistry, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Li, K. Wu, G. Fu, Y. Li, Y. Zhong, X. Lin, Y. Zhou, L. Tian, and S. Huang
Regulation of oleosin expression in developing peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) embryos through nucleosome loss and histone modifications
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2009; 60(15): 4371 - 4382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
J. Verdier and R. D. Thompson
Transcriptional Regulation of Storage Protein Synthesis During Dicotyledon Seed Filling
Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1263 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. K. Udvardi, K. Kakar, M. Wandrey, O. Montanari, J. Murray, A. Andriankaja, J.-Y. Zhang, V. Benedito, J. M.I. Hofer, F. Chueng, et al.
Legume Transcription Factors: Global Regulators of Plant Development and Response to the Environment
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 538 - 549.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. S. Sekhon, T. Peterson, and S. Chopra
Epigenetic Modifications of Distinct Sequences of the p1 Regulatory Gene Specify Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns in Maize
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1059 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. Kotak, E. Vierling, H. Baumlein, and P. v. Koskull-Doring
A Novel Transcriptional Cascade Regulating Expression of Heat Stress Proteins during Seed Development of Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, January 1, 2007; 19(1): 182 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Suzuki, M. G. Ketterling, and D. R. McCarty
Quantitative Statistical Analysis of cis-Regulatory Sequences in ABA/VP1- and CBF/DREB1-Regulated Genes of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 437 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Y. Kagaya, R. Toyoshima, R. Okuda, H. Usui, A. Yamamoto, and T. Hattori
LEAFY COTYLEDON1 Controls Seed Storage Protein Genes through Its Regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Y. Kagaya, R. Okuda, A. Ban, R. Toyoshima, K. Tsutsumida, H. Usui, A. Yamamoto, and T. Hattori
Indirect ABA-dependent Regulation of Seed Storage Protein Genes by FUSCA3 Transcription Factor in Arabidopsis
Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 300 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Zou, J. R. Seemann, D. Neuman, and Q. J. Shen
A WRKY Gene from Creosote Bush Encodes an Activator of the Abscisic Acid Signaling Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55770 - 55779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
D. Yamauchi
Regulation of Gene Expression of a Cysteine Proteinase, EP-C1, by a VIVIPAROUS1-like Factor from Common Bean
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2003; 44(6): 649 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Y. Kim, J. Ma, P. Perret, Z. Li, and T. L. Thomas
Arabidopsis ABI5 Subfamily Members Have Distinct DNA-Binding and Transcriptional Activities
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2002; 130(2): 688 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. S. L. Gampala, D. Hagenbeek, and C. D. Rock
Functional Interactions of Lanthanum and Phospholipase D with the Abscisic Acid Signaling Effectors VP1 and ABI1-1 in Rice Protoplasts
J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 9855 - 9860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (147K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bobb, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bobb, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bustos, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?