Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (152K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Negre, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cortay, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Negre, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cortay, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 713-718

Footnote

DNA flexibility of the UP element is a major determinant for transcriptional activation at the Escherichia coli acetate promoter

DNA flexibility of the UP element is a major determinant for transcriptional activation at the Escherichia coli acetate promoter Didier Nègre , Christelle Bonod-Bidaud , Christelle Oudot , Jean-François Prost , Annie Kolb 1 , Akira Ishihama 2 , Alain J. Cozzone and Jean-Claude Cortay*

Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Proteines, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 7 Passage du Vercors, 69367 Lyon , France , 1 Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris , France and 2 Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima , Shizuoka 411, Japan

Received December 2, 1996; Accepted December 17, 1996

ABSTRACT

The specific interaction of the upstream element-containing promoter of the Escherichia coli acetate operon with either the RNA polymerase holoenzyme or its [alpha] subunit has been analyzed by the base removal method. Our results indicate that: (i) direct and specific base contacts can be detected in the acetate promoter- [alpha] subunit complex; (ii) base elimination in the upstream element of the acetate promoter enhances the binding of RNA polymerase. A similar effect is observed when studying the interactions between RNA polymerase and the rrnB ribosomal operon P1 promoter.

INTRODUCTION

It has recently been shown that, in addition to its two major determinants (the -10 and -35 hexamers), the promoter strength of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase can be greatly increased by a third cis -acting recognition element: the upstream (UP) module. Thus, in the case of the rrnB P1 (promoter of the ribosomal RNA operon), Ross et al . ( 1 ) have demonstrated that interactions between the UP element, which spans an (A+T)-rich region (residues -40 to -60), and the [alpha] subunit of the RNA polymerase induce a 30-fold stimulation, compared to the promoter activity lacking the UP element. Studies performed on mutants of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP) have shown that the C-terminal domain of the [alpha] subunit ([alpha]CTD) is directly involved in such stimulation ( 1 - 3 ). The three-dimensional structure of the C-terminal domain of the [alpha] subunit of RNAP, recently determined by NMR analysis ( 4 ), contains a spatial arrangement of four helices and two arms enclosing a hydrophobic core. When incubated with a 25 bp DNA containing the rrnB P1 UP element, the region of the protein including in particular the amino acid residues of helix 1, and the N-terminal end of helix 4 have been shown to participate in the binding process. However, no detailed description of the structure of the [alpha]CTD- rrnB P1 UP complex has been provided so far, and the process of recognition between the bases of the DNA and the amino acid residues of the [alpha] subunit remains to be determined ( 5 ).

Therefore, in this work, the binding of either purified [alpha] subunit alone, or total RNAP, to the promoter of the ace operon (the operon encoding the enzymes for acetate utilization) of E.coli has been studied by using the `missing contact' chemical approach described by Brunelle and Schleif ( 6 ). We have shown that while the removal of certain bases between positions -32 to -50 of the ace P (promoter region of the ace operon) interferes with the binding of the [alpha] subunit, the elimination of single bases from either strand of the UP-like element results, in contrast, in an enhanced binding affinity of the RNAP. This finding suggests that disruption of the helix in this particular region promotes local DNA flexibility that stabilizes the RNAP-promoter complex. Similar results have been obtained when incubating RNAP specifically with the well-characterized UP element of rrnB P1, which supports the concept that the interference footprinting method is an efficient tool for studying the binding of RNAP to different UP module-containing promoters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

All chemicals were purchased from Fluka except hydrazine which was from Aldrich Chemical Co. Restriction enzymes and DNA modification enzymes were obtained from Promega Corp. The E.coli RNAP (100% [sigma] 70 -saturated) was from Epicentre Technologies. [[alpha]- 32 P]dATP (3000 Ci/mmol), [[alpha]- 32 P]dGTP (3000 Ci/mmol) and [[alpha]- 32 P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol) were obtained from Du Pont-New England Nuclear. Ni 2+ -nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose resin and pQE30 plasmid were from Quiagen Inc. The Protein Pak Glass DEAE 5PW column was from Waters Co.

Construction of plasmid pJCD6

A Bam HI- Dra I DNA fragment containing the rpoA gene encoding the [alpha] subunit of RNA polymerase was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using E.coli K12 chromosomal DNA as template and two oligonucleotides, one carrying a Bam HI site within the following sequence, 5'-TAT GGATCC ATGCAGGGTTCTGTGACAGAGTTTC-3', and the other with a Dra I site in a sequence complementary to the 3'-end of the gene, 5'-TAT TTTAAA TGCCAGACGACGATTAGCAAC-3'. Following PCR, the fragment was restricted with Bam HI+ Dra I and cloned into the compatible sites Bam HI+ Sma I of the expression vector pQE-30 to create plasmid pJCD6. This plasmid encoded the [alpha] subunit under control of the E.coli phage T5 promoter. The rpoA gene contained a 6* His-tag at its 5'-end to facilitate the purification of the corresponding protein by affinity chromatography.

Expression and purification of the recombinant [alpha] subunit

Plasmid pJCD6 was transformed into E.coli strain JM105 ( endA 1, thi , rpsL , sbcB 15, hsdR 4, [Delta]( lac-proAB ), [F', traD 36, proAB , lacI q Z [Delta]M15] ( 7 ). Cells were grown at 37oC in 2* YT broth ( 8 ) in the presence of ampicillin (50 [mu]g/ml) to an absorbance value of 0.7-0.8 at 600 nm, and treated with the inducer isopropyl-[beta]-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at a final concentration of 2 mM. After 2 h of induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation, disrupted in a French pressure cell at 10 000 p.s.i. in buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.3, 10 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol) containing 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM imidazole and 1% Triton X-100. A high-speed supernatant (S30) was then prepared by centrifugation for 30 min at 30 000 g and applied, in a first step, onto a Ni 2+ -nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose column equilibrated with buffer A. After elution of the His 6 -tagged [alpha] subunit with buffer A containing 250 mM imidazole, column fractions enriched with the protein were pooled and dialyzed against buffer A containing 50 mM NaCl. In a second step, the corresponding fractions were loaded onto a DEAE anion exchange column, and elution was achieved with a 0-500 mM NaCl linear gradient in buffer A. Pure [alpha] subunit protein was concentrated and dialyzed against buffer A containing 50% glycerol by using a Vivaspin-50 (Vivasciences Co.) filtration device, and stored at -20oC. Protein concentration was estimated according to the method of Bradford ( 9 ). Size exclusion chromatography showed that, after purification, [alpha] subunit was present as a homodimer in solution ( 10 , 11 ).

Labelling of promoter DNA fragments

Two plasmids, pJCD7 and pJCD8, derived from pBluescript II KS vector (GenBank accession no: X52327, Stratagene) were used to generate radioactively labelled DNA fragments for gel retardation and base removal studies. Plasmid pJCD7 carried a 219 bp (base pairs) Eco RI- Not I fragment containing the ace promoter regulatory region ( 12 ), and plasmid pJCD8 had a 160 bp insert containing the rrnB P1 ( 13 ). In each case, the Eco RI+ Not I fragment was end-labelled at the Not I site by [[alpha]- 32 P]- dGTP (top strand) or at the Eco RI site by [[alpha]- 32 P]dATP (bottom strand), using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase.

Interference experiments

Premodifications of the promoter-containing DNA fragments were carried out by using the base removal approach described in ( 6 ) and modified as follows: (i) promoter DNAs were chemically modified either by formic acid (G+A reaction) or by hydrazine (C+T reaction) in conditions that allowed an average of one modifiing event per DNA molecule ( 14 ) (Table 1 ); (ii) after ethanol precipitation, modified DNAs were loaded on a non-denaturing 4% polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed by using Tris-borate buffer; (iii) following autoradiography, the fastest-moving DNA molecules were electroeluted from gels and assessed in subsequent binding experiments.

Retardation assays were performed essentially as already described ( 15 ). A typical assay mixture contained in 200 [mu]l: 12 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.9, 4 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 95 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 9% (v/v) glycerol, 0.02% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 2 [mu]g poly(dI-dC).poly(dI-dC) as bulk carrier DNA, 10 [mu]g bovine serum albumin, chemically-modified DNA probe (1.7 * 10 6 c.p.m.), and either [alpha] subunit (2.4 [mu]M) or RNAP (2 nM). After incubation for 10 min at 25oC, the mixtures were loaded on a 4% preparative polyacrylamide gel at high-ionic-strength and electrophoresed for 1 h at 30 V/cm. Bands corresponding to free and complexed DNA were visualized by autoradiography on the wet gel after overnight exposure at 4oC. Labelled DNA was excised from the gel, eluted for subsequent piperidine cleavage ( 14 ), and analyzed on a 6% sequencing gel to reveal the position of the interfering modifications. Autoradiograms were analyzed by densitometry using a Personal Densitometer SI from Molecular Dynamics.

Table 1 . Protocol for generating partially depurinated or depyrimidated DNA used in interference studies

G+A reaction

C+T reaction

Mix at 0oC

5*106 c.p.m. DNA in 200 [mu]l H2O

5*106 c.p.m. DNA in 200 [mu]l H2O

 

20 [mu]l formic acid 4%

300 [mu]l hydrazine 98%

Incubate

30 min, 37oC

15 min, 25oC

Add and mix

200 [mu]l NaOAc 300 mM, pH 7.0 and 3 vol ethanol

 

Precipitate

5 min in liquid nitrogen

 

Centrifuge

10 min at 20 000 g

 

Dissolve in

200 [mu]l loading buffer [10% glycerol, 0.1% (w/v) bromophenol blue, and 0.1% (w/v) xylene cyanol]

 

Electrophoresis in

4% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (80:1) in 0.5* TBE buffer

 


Transcription assay

The plasmid pJCD9 used as a template in the in vitro transcription assay carried the ace P region followed by the transcription termination signal T1T2 of the rrnB operon ( 16 ), inserted between the Eco RI and Afl III sites of the pUC19 vector (GenBank accession no: X02514). Transcription experiments were performed at 37oC in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-acetate (pH 8), 100 mM KOAc, 8% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 8 mM MgOAc, 0.1 mM DTT and 500 U/ml RNasin. In a 20 [mu]l typical assay, 60 nM of supercoiled pJCD9 plasmid purified by centrifugation in CsCl/ethidium bromide were incubated for 20 min, with 67 nM of either wild-type RNAP or C-truncated [alpha]-256 RNAP to allow open complex formation. The mutant RNA polymerase containing [alpha]-256 was prepared as described in ( 17 ). Transcription was initiated by adding a nucleotide mix of ATP, GTP and CTP (200 [mu]M each), UTP (10 [mu]M), [[alpha]- 32 P]UTP (2.5 [mu]Ci at 800 Ci/mmol) and 0.1 mg/ml of heparin. After 5 min of incubation, the reaction was stopped by adding 1 vol of formamide loading dye (98% deionized formamide, 0.1% xylene cyanol, 0.1% bromophenol blue and 10 mM EDTA). Following heat denaturation at 65oC, a 5 [mu]l aliquot of the assay was electrophoresed on a 6% sequencing gel and visualized by autoradiography on a Kodak Biomax MR film at -70oC.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Alpha subunit interaction with the ace P

In a number of prokaryotic promoters, the presence of a third recognition element interacting with RNAP, upstream from the -10 and -35 hexamers, remains to be demonstrated. For this purpose, the promoter region of the ace operon ( 12 ) containing a putative UP element, centered around base -50, was studied in order to analyze in detail its interaction with the [alpha] subunit.

The 219 bp Eco RI/ Not I insert obtained after restriction of plasmid pJCD7 (see Materials and Methods) was labelled with [[alpha]- 32 P]dATP, and then used in a gel retardation assay. After incubation of this DNA with a varying amount of [alpha] subunit followed by electrophoresis in a 4% native polyacrylamide gel, a single DNA-protein complex was detected (Fig. 1 ). This result indicates that [alpha] alone can form a stable and specific complex with the ace P DNA fragment, with a binding affinity in the range of that observed for the rrnB P1 (see fig. 3 in ref. 18 ).


Figure 1 . Electrophoretic mobility shift assay for interaction of the [alpha] subunit with the ace P region. The end-labelled 219 bp insert of plasmid pJCD7 containing the ace P was incubated with a varying amount of purified [alpha] subunit, and electrophoresed in a native polyacrylamide gel according to Garner and Revzin (15).

Identification of the [alpha] -binding site in ace P

The precise location of the [alpha]-binding site within the ace P DNA was determined by the base removal method ( 6 ). In this approach, the 219 bp end-labelled DNA fragment containing ace P was depurinated or depyrimidated at a level of slightly less than one base removed per DNA fragment. This partially modified DNA was incubated with the [alpha] subunit, then free and complexed DNA were separated by electrophoresis on a non-denaturing gel. After cleavage at the positions of missing bases, DNA molecules were separated on a sequencing gel to reveal the positions either irrelevant or, instead, crucial to binding. Experiments were performed by removing either G+A residues by treatment with formic acid, or C+T residues by treatment with hydrazine ( 6 , 14 ). The corresponding electrophoretic patterns for both top and bottom DNA strands are shown in Figure 2 A, and a summary of the effects of DNA modifications on [alpha] binding is presented in Figure 3 A. The comparison of band intensity in the lanes of bound and free DNA in Figure 2 A, indicates that missing bases at positions -41 to -50 in the ace P fragment significantly affect [alpha] binding to its DNA target. A weaker effect was observed for bases spanning positions -31 to -37. All together these results show that (i) isolated [alpha] subunit of RNAP actually behaves as a DNA-binding module ( 19 ) capable of interacting specifically, by direct contacts, with a limited number of bases of the UP element in the ace operon; (ii) recombinant [alpha] subunit which was purified as a homodimer, partly contacts a region of the ace P that exhibits palindromy (Fig. 3 A). This specific mode of interaction with DNA might be related to the fact that the [alpha] subunit does not contain the well-characterized helix-turn-helix motif detected in many other bacterial DNA-binding proteins ( 20 ); (iii) most of the contacted bases detected by base removal experiments span a region that overlaps the ace operator of the IclR repressor previously characterized by chemical and enzymatic footprinting ( 21 , 22 ). Since these two sequences are, in this case, essentially coincident, one can consider that the negative regulator IclR could partially inhibit transcription by steric hindrance, i.e . , by preventing access of RNAP to the extended promoter of the ace operon.


Figure 2 . Base removal experiments with ace P and rrnB P1. The 219 bp DNA fragment containing ace P was 32 P-labelled at either the Not I site referred to as `TOP', or at the Eco RI referred to as `BOTTOM' (see Materials and Methods). DNA molecules were treated with either formic acid to remove G+A, or hydrazine to remove C+T, and incubated with [alpha] subunit ( A ) or RNAP ( B ) before electrophoresis and autoradiography. BOUND, gel lanes with the modified DNA isolated from complexes; FREE, gel lanes with the DNA that had dissociated or was free of complexes. ( C ) Experiments carried out in the same conditions as described above, between RNAP and the Eco RI- Not I insert of plasmid pJCD8 (bottom strand) containing rrnB P1.


Figure 3 . Summary of base removal experiments. ( A and B ) Data obtained for the ace promoter complexed with [alpha] subunit and RNAP, respectively. ( C ) Data obtained for the rrnB P1 promoter complexed with RNAP. In each case, [Delta] indicates the position where a missing base results in binding interference; s, indicates the position where base removal leads to enhanced binding. The numbering gives the position of nucleotides relative to the first nucleotide of the transcribed region, referred to as +1. Palindromy is underlined by two converging horizontal arrows.

RNAP interaction with ace P

The binding of RNAP to ace P was studied by using the same chemical interference approach as that described above. Figure 2 B shows the autoradiograms of the depurination (G+A) and the depyrimidation (C+T) footprints obtained for both the top strand and the bottom strand of ace P complexed with RNAP. Comparison of the band intensity of bound and free fractions reveals two distinct regions where a missing base enhances the affinity of RNAP for its promoter. The first region, between positions -5 and -14 (Fig. 3 B), including the ace P -10 hexamer, likely corresponds to the `melting domain' of the initiation complex. This result is in agreement with the footprinting experiments previously performed with the promoter A1 of the E.coli RNAP and with the promoter sites of the RNA polymerases of bacteriophages T3, T7, and SP6 ( 23 , 24 ). Of particular interest was the detection of an increased affinity of RNAP for ace P when the bases in the region -43 to -73 on either strand of DNA were removed (Figs 2 B and 3 B). The DNA between positions -43 and -62 in this region of the promoter shares common features with the UP element of the ribosomal rrnB P1 ( 1 ).

These data provide evidence, on the one hand, that the mode of interaction of RNAP with the UP element of the ace P is essentially dependent on the structure of DNA. On the other hand, base removal interference experiments carried out with isolated [alpha] subunit have shown that only a few direct base contacts occur with a region of DNA that partially overlaps the UP module. This quite different behavior suggests that, when it is part of RNAP, the [alpha] subunit can recognize a higher order structure of the UP element rather than its primary nucleotide sequence. This finding could be connected with the previous observation that the purified [alpha] subunit of RNAP retains the ability to bind the UP element of the ada and rrnB P1 promoters ( 1 , 25 ).

Moreover, the DNA encompassing residues -66 to -73 partially overlaps the 3'-end of a proximal IHF-binding site recently characterized in the ace promoter/operator regulatory region (Fig. 2 B) ( 26 ). In several operons the IHF factor is known to facilitate the loop formation responsible for the contacts between RNAP and DNA sequences located further upstream from the ihf site. In our case, such a structural role for IHF could be mimicked by the functional replacement of the IHF-binding site by a DNA of enhanced flexibility. The detection of both an IHF-binding site and an UP element has been already reported in the case of the ilvGMEDA operon of E.coli ( 27 ). Mutagenesis experiments recently performed on the promoter area have shown that transcriptional activation of these two regions are functionally independent ( 28 ).

Finally, it can be noted that, when they are missing, the four thymines (-92 to -95) in the top strand of the ace P DNA also increase RNAP binding (Fig. 2 B). This long-distance stimulation of the promoter strength was previously detected in several natural and hybrid promoters, and could be related to the presence of A+T-rich tracts in the DNA ( 29 - 32 ).

In vitro transcription from ace P with wild-type and mutant [alpha] -256 RNAPs

Specific recognition between the [alpha] subunit of RNAP and the UP-element of ace P has been analyzed by in vitro transcription. In this assay, the supercoiled plasmid pJCD9 containing the ace P region upstream from the rrnB transcription termination signal T1T2, was incubated with either wild-type RNAP or mutant RNAP containing the C-truncated [alpha]-256 subunit ( 17 ). RNA transcripts generated in both reactions were then separated on a 6% sequencing gel and revealed by autoradiography.

Comparison between tracks in Figure 4 shows that while, on the one hand, an equivalent amount of the control transcript RNA-1 was synthetized in both cases, on the other hand, the ace RNA was only present at a level ~8-fold higher when transcription was initiated with wild-type RNAP. These results therefore demonstrate that the specific recognition between RNAP and the UP-element is mediated by the C-terminus of the [alpha] subunit which stimulates the ace promoter expression.


Figure 4 . In vitro transcription from ace promoter with wild type RNAP and a mutant polymerase containing a C-terminally truncated [alpha] subunit ([alpha]-256). Transcription assays were performed according to the procedure described in Materials and Methods with the pJCD9 plasmid. The respective positions of the RNA I (107-108 nt) and ace P (179 nt) transcripts are indicated by arrows.

Binding of RNAP to rrnB P1

In order to check the results presented above, base removal experiments were performed on the rrnB P1-RNAP complex. Figure 2 C shows that, in this case again, two sites of increased affinity for RNAP can be detected when the bases from positions -7 to -15, and from positions -40 to -53, were removed by chemical treatment of the bottom DNA strand. These regions of functional importance could be related with the `melting domain' and with the UP module of the rrnB P1 promoter, respectively. Indeed, this latter region coincides with the (A+T)-rich [alpha]-binding site which was characterized by DNase I and hydroxyl radical protection assays ( 1 , 2 ).

Our results concerning two different UP module-containing promoters suggest that local DNA flexibility generated in the UP element facilitates its recognition by RNAP. This observation is in agreement with previous data that demonstrate the ability of intrinsically curved DNA, upstream the -35 region, to increase the interaction of E.coli RNAP with its promoter ( 33 , 34 ). Moreover, by studying both in vivo and in vitro a series of mutations within the -10 to -35 region of the proU promoter of Salmonella typhimurium , it has been suggested that increased DNA flexibility is required for the activation of these mutant promoters ( 35 ).

Furthermore, recent work carried out on the spacer DNA, a region that has been proposed to contact specifically the [alpha] subunit, between the CRP-binding site and the lac promoter, has shown that it contains no specific sequence determinant for lac transcription activation ( 36 ).

Taken together, these results could explain the previous failure to define a precise consensus [alpha]-binding site from all the UP elements detected so far.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the C.N.R.S. (UPR 412), the Université de Lyon and the Institut Universitaire de France. We thank Emmanuelle Duglas, Christian Van Herrewege and Alain Bosch for their help in preparing the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1 Ross, W., Gosink, K.K., Salomon, J., Igarashi, K., Zou, C., Ishihama, A., Severinov, K. and Gourse, R.L. (1993) Science 262, 1407-1413.

2 Rao, L., Ross, W., Appleman, J.A., Gaal, T., Leirmo, S., Schlax, P.J., Record, M.T. and Gourse, R.L. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1421-1435.

3 Murakami, K., Fujita, N. and Ishihama, A. (1996) EMBO. J. 15, 4358-4367.

4 Jeon, Y.H., Negishi, T., Shirakawa, M., Yamazaki, T., Fujita, N., Ishihama, A. and Kyogoku, Y. (1995) Science 270, 1495-1497.

5 Gaal, T., Ross, W., Blatter, E.E., Tang, H., Jia, X., Krishnan, V.V., Assa-Munt, N., Ebright, R.H. and Gourse, R.L. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 16-26.

6 Brunelle, A. and Schleif, R.F. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6673-6676.

7 Yanish-Perron, C., Viera, J. and Messing, J. (1985) Gene 33, 103-119.

8 Miller, J.H. (1972) Experimental in Molecular Genetics Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

9 Bradford, M.M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254.

10 Blatter, E.E., Ross, W., Tang, H., Gourse, R.L. and Ebright, R.H. (1994) Cell 78, 889-896.

11 Negishi, T., Fujita, N. and Ishihama, A. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 248, 723-728.

12 Byrne, C., Stokes, H.W. and Ward, K.A. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 9342-9342.

13 Brosius, J., Dull, T.J., Sleeter, D.D. and Noller, H.F. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 148, 107-124.

14 Maxam, A.M. and Gilbert, W. (1980) Methods Enzymol. 65, 499-560.

15 Garner, M.M. and Revzin, A. (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 3047-3060.

16 Brownlee, G.G., Sanger, F., and Barrell, B. G. (1967) Nature 215, 735-736.

17 Igarashi, K. and Ishihama, A. (1991) Cell 32, 319-325.

18 Tang, H., Severinov, K., Goldfarb, A. and Ebright, R.H. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4902-4906.

19 Busby, S. and Ebright, R.H. (1994) Cell 79, 743-746.

20 Harrison, S.C. and Aggarwal, A.K. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 933-969.

21 Cortay, J.C., Nègre, D., Galinier, A., Duclos, B., Perrière, G. and Cozzone, A.J. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 675-679.

22 Nègre, D., Cortay, J.C., Galinier, A., Sauve, P. and Cozzone, A.J. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 228, 23-29.

23 Jorgensen, E.D., Durbin, R.K., Risman, S.S. and McAllister, W.T. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 645-651.

24 Werel, W., Schickor, P. and Heumann, H. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2589-2594.

25 Landini, P. and Volkert, M.R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4329-4335.

26 Resnik, E., Pan, B., Ramani, N., Freundlich, M. and LaPorte, D.C. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 2715-2717.

27 Pagel, J.M., Winkelman, J.W., Adams, C.W. and Hatfield, G.W. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 919-935.

28 Parekh, B.S. and Hatfield, G.W. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1173-1177.

29 McAllister, C.F. and Achberger, E.C. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11743-11749.

30 Bracco, L.T., Kotlarz, A., Kolb, A., Diekmann, S. and Buc, H. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 4289-4296.

31 Gartenberg, M.R. and Crothers, D.M. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 219, 217-230.

32 Ellinger, T., Behnke, D., Knaus, R., Bujard, H. and Gralla, J.D. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 239, 466-475.

33 Travers, A.A. (1990) Cell 60, 177-180.

34 Nickerson, C.A. and Achberger, E.C. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 5756-5761.

35 Jordi, B.J.A.M., Owen-Hughes, T.A., Hulton, C.S.J. and Higgins, C.F. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5690-5700.

36 Flatow, U., Rajendrakumar, G.V. and Garges, S. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 2436-2439.


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 472 72 26 87; Fax: +33 472 72 26 01; Email: cortay@ibcp.fr
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
W. Ross, A. Ernst, and R. L. Gourse
Fine structure of E. coli RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: {alpha} subunit binding to the UP element minor groove
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2001; 15(5): 491 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. J. Noel Jr. and W. S. Reznikoff
Structural Studies of lacUV5-RNA Polymerase Interactions in Vitro. ETHYLATION INTERFERENCE AND MISSING NUCLEOSIDE ANALYSIS
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7708 - 7712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J.-F. Prost, D. Nègre, C. Oudot, K. Murakami, A. Ishihama, A. J. Cozzone, and J.-C. Cortay
Cra-Dependent Transcriptional Activation of the icd Gene of Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol., February 1, 1999; 181(3): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (152K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Negre, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cortay, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Negre, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cortay, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?