Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (110K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt-Schupp, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt-Schupp, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press 743-749

Footnote

The RAD5 gene product is involved in the avoidance of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The RAD5 gene product is involved in the avoidance of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fred Ahne , Bhavanath Jha 1 and Friederike Eckardt-Schupp*

Institut für Strahlenbiologie, GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit GmbH, Neuherberg, Postfach 1129, 85758 Oberschleißheim , Germany and 1 Botany Department, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga -846 004, India

Received November 11, 1996; Revised and Accepted December 23, 1996

ABSTRACT

In wild-type yeast, the repair of a 169 bp double-strand gap induced by the restriction enzymes Apa I and Nco I in the URA3 gene of the shuttle vector YpJA18 occurs with high fidelity according to the homologous chromosomal sequence. In contrast, only 25% of the cells of rad5-7 and rad5 [Delta] mutants perform correct gap repair. As has been proven by sequencing of the junction sites, the remaining cells recircularise the gapped plasmids by joining of the non-compatible, non-homologous ends. Thus, regarding the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, the rad5 mutants behave like mammalian cells rather than budding yeast. The majority of the end joined plasmids miss either one or both of the 3 ' and 5 ' protruding single-strands of the restriction ends completely and have undergone blunt-end ligation accompanied by fill-in DNA synthesis. These results imply an important role for the Rad5 protein (Rad5p) in the protection of protruding single-strand ends and for the avoidance of non-homologous end joining during repair of double-strand gaps in budding yeast. Alternatively, the Rad5p may be an accessory factor increasing the efficiency of homologous recombination in yeast, however, the molecular mechanism of Rad5p function requires further investigation.

INTRODUCTION

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) arise during cellular processes such as replication and recombination or due to external influences ( 1 - 4 ). It is generally assumed that increased radiation sensitivity in yeast and mammalian cell mutants is due to some deficiency in DSB repair ( 5 - 9 ). Several different cellular mechanisms are operative in the rejoining of DSB in diverse organisms.

In mammalian cells, the existing data suggest double-strand break rejoining to be the major pathway, rather than homologous recombination ( 10 , 11 ). The exact mechanism of DSB repair processes has not yet been elucidated. However, it is well proven that DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is involved in the rejoining of radiation-induced DSB as well as breaks arising during V(D)J recombination ( 12 - 16 ). DNA-PK consists of three subunits, the DNA end-binding Ku heterodimers Ku70 and Ku80 (polypeptides of ~70 and ~80 kDa respectively) and the catalytic subunit DNA-PK cs of ~460 kDa ( 17 ). As has been deduced from restriction enzyme-cut plasmids transformed into mammalian cells, DNA ends of various configurations are predominantly repaired by end joining mechanisms without requiring extensive homology between the molecules to be joined ( 1 , 18 - 28 ). Such non-homologous end joining is often associated with sequence rearrangements and has been regarded as a mutagenic process ( 26 , 27 ). Commonly, the sequences of the DNA ends are preserved during repair of restriction enzyme-induced DSB and larger loss of information has been shown for a few junctional sequences ( 20 , 29 ). These results are in contrast to X-ray-induced DSB, where repair of damage is frequently associated with large deletions ( 30 ).

In contrast to mammalian cells, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae repairs DSB primarily by homologous recombination controlled by the RAD5 2 epistasis group of genes ( 7 , 31 - 35 ). Illegitimate non-homologous DNA end joining is detectable only in the absence of homology or in mutants incapable of homologous recombination. This process is invariably associated with deletion, insertion or duplication at the junction site ( 36 - 39 ). Recently, it has been shown that the yeast Ku70 homologue, the Hdf1 protein, controls an alternative process of DSB rejoining which is detectable only in the absence of homologous recombination. Obviously, this pathway is of minor importance for yeast, since hdf1 mutants do not exhibit sensitivity towards ionising radiation ( 40 ), however, they are sensitive to bleomycin ( 41 ). On the other hand, as indicated by the enhanced sensitivity of the corresponding mutants towards ionising radiation, some genes of the RAD6 epistasis group (such as RAD6 , RAD5 and RAD18 ) may be of increased importance for the repair of X-ray-induced damage by a mechanism that can function, at least partially, in the absence of homologous chromosomes ( 42 - 44 ). Mutations in the RAD5 , RAD6 and RAD18 genes cause a hyper-recombinagenic phenotype as opposed to mutants of the RAD5 2 group of genes, which are mostly hypo-recombinagenic ( 45 ). This seems to be further support for the argument that in yeast these genes participate in the genetic control of an alternative pathway of DSB repair to RAD52 -controlled homologous recombination. It is not known whether this presumed non-homologous mechanism is related to an end joining process and whether the HDF1 gene plays a role in that putative pathway. So far, genetic analysis has disproved epistasis with the RAD1 as well as the RAD52 genes ( 40 ).

The RAD5 gene of S.cerevisiae , a member of the RAD6 epistasis group, has been cloned and analysed ( 46 , 47 ); the predicted Rad5 protein (Rad5p) possesses seven putative helicase domains, two zinc finger motifs and a leucine zipper motif. So far, analysis of the purified protein has demonstrated a functional nucleotide binding site, but no helicase activity has been detected ( 48 ). Strains carrying mutations in the RAD5 gene are sensitive to UV, ionising radiation and certain chemicals and they show locus- and allele-dependent effects on spontaneous and UV-induced mutagenesis ( 49 - 53 ).

In order to investigate what role the RAD5 gene plays in DSB repair in yeast, we have previously measured the repair of 60 Co [gamma]-ray-induced DSB under non-growth conditions (buffer) applying pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for DSB quantitation ( 54 - 56 ). We could show that a diploid rad5- 7 mutant is capable of restoring chromosomal length DNA within 24 h to a level similar to that of the corresponding repair-competent wild-type diploid strain (~25% residual DSB). However, the initial rejoining was considerably slower in rad5-7 mutants as compared with the wild-type. After 10 h, 80% residual DSB in the mutant as compared with 40% in the wild-type was found (Friedl, unpublished results). In addition, we observed that the rad5- 7 mutant exhibits a high percentage of incorrect repair of DSB and small double-stranded gaps (DSG) induced by restriction enzymes into a double-marker plasmid ( 57 ). Therefore, we assume that the radiosensitivity of rad5 mutants is not due to a general defect in DSB rejoining, but due to a high percentage of misrepaired radiation-induced DSB. In this respect rad5 mutants of yeast may be comparable with human ataxia telangiectasia cell lines and radiation-sensitive Chinese hamster cell line V79. In these cell lines the radiosensitivity is not due to a deficiency in rejoining DSB but to reduced fidelity of rejoining ( 58 - 60 ).

Here we provide more information on the role of Rad5p in DSG repair by use of our previously established plasmid system which allows homologous recombination to be distinguished from non-homologous processes at the DNA sequence level. We employed a screening system by use of the shuttle plasmid YpJA18 ( 57 ), which contains two selectable yeast genes ( TRP1 and URA3 ), a sequence for autonomous replication ( ARS ) in yeast and a centromeric region ( CEN4 ). Plasmids of this kind show defined nucleosome structure and have been considered as circular minichromosomes ( 61 , 62 ). YpJA18 can be transformed into haploid yeast strains ( trp1-289 , ura3-52 ) of various repair capacities, either circular (as a control) or linearised by restriction enzymes yielding a DSB or a DSG (deletion of 169 bp by a Nco I -Apa I double-digest) in the URA3 gene. Correct repair of the DSB and DSG restores uracil proficiency. Correct repair of a DSG can be achieved only by homologous recombination with the corresponding sequence retained in the chromosomal sequence (which is sufficiently distant from the ura3-52 mutation; 63 , 64 ). Uracil auxotrophy reflecting misrepair can be due either to mutations caused by error-prone homologous recombination or to non-homologous processes such as end joining. Therefore, we have analysed the sequence of the gap junctions in misrepaired plasmids in order to discriminate between these processes. Our results indicate that the RAD5 gene is required for correct DSB repair by homologous recombination in yeast, possibly to suppress non-homologous end joining of the plasmid DNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains

The following haploid strains of the yeast S.cerevisiae were used:

MKP-0: MAT[alpha], can1-100 , ade2-1 , lys2-1 , ura3-52 , leu2-3-112 , his3 -[Delta] 200 , trp1 - [Delta] 901 , RAD (kindly provided by Dr B.A.Kunz, Geelong, Australia)

MKP-0 rad5 [Delta]: MAT[alpha], can1-100 , ade2-1 , lys2-1 , ura3-52 , leu2-3-112 , his3 -[Delta] 200 ,

trp1 -[Delta] 901 , rad5 [Delta]:: HIS3

WS 8100-3A: MAT[alpha], ade2-1 , trp1-289 , ura3-52 , arg4-17 , his5-2 , lys2-1 , rad5-7 .

The bacterial strain HB101 was used as the recipient for amplification of the plasmids in Escherichia coli.

Plasmids

The shuttle vector YpJA18 ( 57 ) was used for transformation of the yeast strains in order to perform the analysis of repair fidelity.

Media

YEPD, consisting of 2% dextrose, 2% Bacto peptone, 1% yeast extract solidified with 2% agar if required, was used as complete growth medium for yeast. Yeast transformants were plated on SC medium containing 4% dextrose, 0.33% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulphate and 2% agar, supplemented with 9.8 g/l ammonium sulphate, 5 mg/l adenine, 20 mg/l arginine, 20 mg/l histidine, 40 mg/l lycine, 20 mg/l tryptophan and 20 mg/l uracil. For selection of TRP + and URA + prototrophs tryptophan (SC-Tryp) and uracil (SC-Ura) were omitted.

Escherichia coli was propagated in LB medium, containing 1% Bacto trypton, 1% sodium chloride, 0.5% yeast extract, pH 7.5, supplemented with 100 mg/l ampicillin. All chemicals for media were purchased from Difco.

Transformation and selection of transformants

Transformation of yeast was carried out according to the modified lithium acetate method ( 65 ); transformation of E.coli was performed according to the standard calcium chloride procedure.

DSG repair was assessed by transforming yeast cells with plasmid YpJA18 DNA either circular (as control) or linearised by a double digest with Apa I and Nco I, thus causing a 169 bp deletion (DSG). In order to avoid contamination with uncut, circular plasmids, only linear DNA purified by agarose electrophoresis was transformed into yeast. After transformation, the cells were first selected for TRP + expression, then the transformed colonies were replica plated on selective medium without uracil to score for URA3 expression. Estimates of repair fidelity are based on the ratio of Trp + Ura + to Trp + colonies.

General procedures were performed according to standard methods ( 66 ). Isolation of plasmid DNA from E.coli , restriction analysis, Southern blot analysis and elution of plasmid DNA from gels were performed as described previously ( 46 ). For the preparation of plasmids from transformed yeast cells a modified method of Robzyk and Kassier ( 67 ) was used.

Disruption of the RAD5 gene

Plasmid pBR322 carrying a 1.1 kb Cla I fragment of the 3.5 kb RAD5 reading frame was used to construct a rad5 [Delta] disruption mutant. A 1.8 kb Bam HI fragment carrying the HIS3 gene of S.cerevisiae was inserted into the unique Bgl II restriction site on the 1.1 kb Cla I fragment generating a 2.8 kb Cla I- Eco RV fragment. This fragment was isolated and transformed into haploid S.cerevisiae wild-type cells ( RAD5 , strain MKP-0). His + transformants were selected; disruption of the RAD5 gene was verified by Southern blot analysis (data not shown).

DNA sequencing

DNA was subjected to sequence analysis according to Sanger employing a T7 DNA polymerase sequencing kit (Pharmacia). The reactions were performed according to the supplier's protocol using 2 [mu]mol sequencing primer for each reaction. Primers P1 (5'-TGGAGTTAGTTGAAGCATTA) and P2 (5'-CTGCTAACATCAAAAGGCCT) were used for sequencing ~250 bp (both strands) at the site of the Nco I- Apa I-derived DSG.

Survival experiments

For determination of the [gamma]-ray sensitivity of the rad5 [Delta] disruption mutant standard procedures were employed as described previously ( 40 ).

RESULTS

Construction and characterisation of a mutant disrupted in the RAD5 gene

As previously reported, we observed that ~20% of rad5-7 clones transformed with linearised gapped plasmid YpJA18 were Ura + , indicating repair by homologous recombination ( 57 ). In order to eliminate the possibility that this remaining level of correct repair of DSB and DSG was due to some residual Rad5p activity in the point mutant, we constructed a RAD5 :: HIS3 disruption (see Materials and Methods). Disruption in the RAD5 gene was confirmed by Southern blot analysis and absence of the transcript by RT-PCR (data not shown). The rad5 [Delta] mutant is UV sensitive as compared with the RAD5 wild-type strain; the survival curves are similar to those of the non-isogenic rad5- 7 point mutant used in a previous work ( 57 ; data not shown). For 60 Co [gamma]-irradiation, the disruption mutant shows moderate sensitivity in comparison with the wild-type strain (Fig. 1 ). This indicates some role for Rad5p in DSB repair supplementary to homologous recombination as the main DSB repair pathway, which is in contrast to the role of the Hdf1 protein, which seems to be important for DSB rejoining only when homologous recombination is impaired ( 40 , 68 ).


Figure 1 . Survival of haploid strains following [gamma]-ray treatment of stationary phase cells. Cells were irradiated with a 60 Co [gamma] source at 20 Gy/min in suspension under O 2 aeration.

Selection of correctly and incorrectly repairing transformants

Using the previously constructed vector YpJA18 our studies on the repair of DSG are comparable with similar studies in mammalian cells ( 30 , 69 ). Uncut and `gapped' plasmids linearised by digestion with Nco I (recessed 3'-end) and Apa I (recessed 5'-end) and thus lacking a 169 bp fragment in the URA3 gene were transformed into haploid yeast strains ( trp1 , ura3-52 ) to complement the auxotrophies for tryptophan and uracil. Initial selection for Trp + prototrophs allowed identification of transformant clones irrespective of the fidelity of DSG repair in the URA3 gene. The transformation frequencies were ~3 * 10 3 transformants/[mu]g DNA in the wild-type and both rad5 mutant strains. In the next step, the transformed colonies were selected for URA3 expression. Uracil proficiency was taken as an indication of correct repair of the restriction enzyme-generated DSG by homologous recombination with the chromosomal gene. The percentage of transformants repairing correctly was calculated as described in Materials and Methods.

Table 1 shows the transformation frequencies as well as the rate of correct repair for circular and gapped plasmid DNA transformed into haploid recipient strains. For the uncut plasmid, the URA3 gene was expressed in ~90-100% of all transformants irrespective of the DNA repair capacity of the yeast strain used. In the repair-competent RAD wild-type strain, 97% of the transformants with the gapped plasmid were Ura + . Of special interest are the findings for the rad5- 7 point mutant and the rad5 [Delta] disruption mutant. For the cut plasmid, both rad5 mutant strains showed transformation efficiencies similar to the wild-type strain, but uracil proficiency was detected in 18 and 26% of the Trp + transformants only. Thus, both the point and the disruption mutations of the RAD5 gene result in erroneous DSG repair in 74-82% of cells of the population and only 18-26% of the cells correctly restored the gap in the plasmid DNA by recombination with the homologous chromosome. It seems unlikely that this effect is due to residual Rad5p activity in the point mutant, since the disruption mutant shows the identical phenotype.


Figure 2 . Sequences of the repair patch junctions. ( a ) 5' and 3' protruding ends were created by the restriction enzymes Nco I and Apa I. ( b ) Blunt-blunt ligation after degradation of the single-stranded protruding ends. ( c ) Blunt-blunt ligation after deletion of one base pair (CG). ( d ) Blunt-blunt ligation (deletion of two CG and insertion of one AT base pair). ( e ) Blunt ligation after fill-in of the single stranded 5'-region by polymerase activity and degradation of the 3' protruding ends by exonuclease. ( f ) Intermediate of filled-in 5'-ends and partially degraded 3'-end. ( g ) Degraded 5'-PSS and partially degraded and filled-in 3'-ends. Bold letters indicate newly synthesised base(s). The total numbers of events are given in brackets on the right.

Table 1 Recovery of clones indicating correct repair of the restriction enzyme-induced ( Apa I- Nco I) double-strand gap in the two-marker YpJA18 plasmid transfected into haploid repair-competent wild-type and repair-deficient rad5 mutant yeast strains
Yeast strain

Uncut plasmid

 

 

Gapped plasmid

 

 

 

Transformation

Trp+Ura+/Trp+ a

Ura+ (%)b

Transformation

Trp+Ura+/Trp+ a

Ura+ (%)b

 

frequency

 

 

frequency

 

 

 

(103 /[mu]g DNA)

 

 

(103/[mu]g DNA)

 

 

Wild-type (RAD)

2.98

370/372

100

3.15

584/600

97

rad5-7

3.00

173/188

92

3.20

146/796

18

rad5[Delta]

2.99

297/300

99

3.00

78/300

26

a The number of uracil-proficient colonies (Trp + Ura + ) was identified among the total number of Trp + colonies scored in five independent experiments. b The percent numbers indicate the proportion of Trp + clones correctly repairing the URA3 gene.

DNA sequence analysis of the repair patch junctions

Misrepair of a DSG can be due either to error-prone homologous recombination or, alternatively, to non-homologous end joining. Sequence analysis of the junction sites in the misrepaired plasmids allows discrimination between these alternative sources of error and the spectra of sequence alterations allow conclusions on the function of Rad5p in DSB repair.

Therefore, plasmids from eight Trp + Ura - and 10 Trp + Ura + clones of the RAD wild-type strain and 56 Trp + Ura - (19 of rad5-7 , 37 of rad5 [Delta]) and 10 Trp + Ura + clones of the rad5 strains were isolated following propagation in SD-Trp. Starting from the two sequencing primer binding sites P1 (53 bp upstream of the Nco I restriction site) and P2 (55 bp downstream of the Apa I restriction site) up to 250 bp were sequenced on both strands. The sequences of the repair patch junctions are depicted schematically in Figure 2 .

All sequences derived from plasmids restoring the Ura + phenotype showed exact restitution of the 169 bp gap without any alteration within the junction site if isolated from the RAD wild-type or the rad5 mutant strains. In three of eight plasmids isolated from Trp + Ura - clones derived from the RAD wild-type, the gap was reconstituted and within 250 bp no mutation was found. Apparently, a mutational change possibly unrelated to the recombination event had occurred at a greater distance. Of the remaining five clones, two contained sequences of unknown origin and three shuttle vectors could not be sequenced by use of primers P1 and P2 and were excluded from further analysis. Not a single case of end joining was found in RAD5 wild-type clones. In contrast, only one out of 56 Trp + Ura - clones of the rad5 mutants showed erroneous recombination upon restoring the 169 bp deletion. In the remaining 55 Trp + Ura - clones the ends were joined without incorporation of the missing 169 bp sequence. End joining was accompanied by various modifications of the DNA ends. No differences at the junction sites between clones derived from the rad5- 7 and the rad5 [Delta] mutant were observed.

Analysis of junctional breakpoints in the rad5 -derived plasmids

Sequence analysis of the junction sites in plasmids circularised by end joining revealed that the majority of the alterations were confined to the protruding single strands introduced by the restriction enzymes Nco I (5'-protruding single strand, 5'-PSS) and Apa I (3'-PSS). In most cases (46 out of 55), the terminal sequences were shortened by elimination of the protruding 4 nt from both the 5'-PSS and 3'-PSS, resulting in the fusion of two blunt ends (`blunt-blunt', Fig. 2 b). In four cases (Fig. 2 e), the 5'-PSS remained intact while the 3'-PSS was completely removed. Subsequently, the single-stranded region was presumably filled in by polymerase activity from the recessed 3'-end of the 5'-PSS. In another two cases (Fig. 2 f), the 3'-PSS was shortened by 2-3 nt without any change in the 5'-PSS and the resulting 6-7 nt single-stranded region was filled in. Approximately 96% of the deletions affected the terminal single-stranded ends (2-4 nt), whereas only 3% extended 1-2 nt further into the adjacent duplex region (Fig. 2 d). The maximum size of a deletion was 10 bp. This suggests that the end joining system operating in the rad5 mutants but not in the wild-type strain eliminates single-stranded overhangs preferentially to produce blunt ends which are then ligated. Further deletions affecting such newly formed blunt ends were infrequent and restricted to 1 nt at one blunt end (Fig. 2 c). In one case (Fig. 2 d), a single extra nucleotide was added at the junction site of two blunt-ended sequences. In summary, the obtained junctions include those which result from joining of two double-stranded ends (DD junctions, 84%), joining of the 5'-PSS with a double-stranded end (DS junction, 11%) and joining of the 5'- with the 3'-PSS (SS junction, 5%). We did not observe any short patches of homologies at the break points and exclude therefore that a single-strand annealing mechanism was involved. Thus, analysis of the junction sites revealed a mechanism of DSG repair that preferentially joins abutting ends without any homologies (two blunt ends or one blunt end with a PSS tail) in the rad5 mutant strains.

DISCUSSION

Some of the genes of the RAD6 epistasis group of repair genes in the yeast S.cerevisiae control a mechanism of DSB repair which presumably is an alternative to the dominant route of homologous recombination controlled by the RAD5 2 epistasis group, as it is probably independent of homologous chromosomes ( 42 - 44 ). However, its molecular mechanism is unknown so far. We have shown that the efficiencies of DSB rejoining in the diploid rad5-7 mutant are comparable with wild-type cells in chromosomal DNA as well as the plasmid system. However, the initial rate of DSB repair in chromosomes (Friedl, unpublished results) as well as the fidelity of DSB and gap (DSG) repair analysed in plasmid DNA is reduced ( 44 , 57 ).

In this study we made use of our previously established shuttle vector YpJA18, exhibiting nucleosomal structure in yeast ( 61 , 62 ), to further characterise the possible function of Rad5p in DSG repair. We introduced a gap of 169 bp in the URA3 gene of YpJA18 which was then transformed into isogenic strains differing in their RAD5 -controlled repair capacities. A DSG can be correctly repaired only by recombination with a homologous sequence. The original sequence of the gap cannot be restored by non-homologous end joining or illegitimate recombination, an alternative but rare pathway in yeast ( 36 , 38 , 70 ). End joining possibly re-establishes the information disrupted by a DSB but does not restore the sequence of a DSG; additionally, error-prone recombination can result in misrepair of DSB as well as DSG. These two possibilities can be discriminated by sequence analysis of the repair patch sites.

In RAD wild-type strains the transformation frequencies of gapped and circular plasmids are nearly identical and only 3% of the gapped plasmids are misrepaired. This indicates the high efficiency and high fidelity of DSG as well as DSB repair in yeast. In contrast, rad54-1 , rad50-1 and rad51-1 mutants of the RAD5 2 group of genes, which are deficient in homologous recombination, show 50- to 100-fold reduced transformation frequencies of linearised as compared with circular plasmids and ~96-98% of the gapped plasmids are misrepaired in these mutants ( 57 ). Non-circularised plasmids cannot be propagated in yeast. Therefore, the low transformation frequency in the recombination-deficient mutants indicates a low efficiency of gap repair and the high frequency of misrepaired gaps refers to an alternative, obviously error-prone pathway. These results are consistent with the current opinion (i) that in yeast DSG repair is preferentially performed by homologous recombination with high sequence fidelity and that (ii) at least one alternative pathway exists which is error-prone and might be non-homologous end joining or illegitimate recombination.

Based on extensive genetic analysis of DNA repair pathways ( 35 ) and the hyper-recombinogenic phenotype of rad5 mutants ( 49 ; Kupiec personal communication), it can be assumed that the RAD52 -dependent mechanism for DSB repair is active in rad5 mutants. As expected, the transformation frequencies for the linearised plasmid in the rad5 [Delta] disruption mutant are almost identical to those for uncut plasmids, cut plasmids in the isogenic RAD wild-type and of a rad5- 7 point mutant of a different genetic background. However, in ~75-80% of the clones of both rad5- 7 and rad5 [Delta] mutant strains the gaps in the URA3 gene on the plasmids are misrepaired despite a homologous sequence on the chromosome. Experiments with a different plasmid system indicate that this effect is not specific to the URA3 gene (unpublished data).

Our results suggest that in addition to the gene products of the RAD52 group required for gap repair by homologous recombination and the presence of homologous sequences, Rad5p is required for DSG repair by homologous recombination and for avoiding non-homologous end joining. The fact that 26% of the cells of the rad5 [Delta] disruption mutant are capable of correctly performing DSG repair supports the genetic evidence that homologous recombination can function in the absence of Rad5p. Nevertheless, the remaining 76% of the rad5 [Delta] cells restore the gap by end joining without restoring URA3 function. This might indicate that Rad5p antagonises some factor(s) which initiates end joining and that in the absence of Rad5p this/these factor(s) might gain importance, increasing the fraction of end joining. Alternatively, some other factor(s) could partially replace Rad5p function or Rad5p may be an accessory factor increasing the efficiency of homologous recombination. Our data support the notion that Rad5p is neither involved in the processes of homologous recombination nor in non-homologous end joining. Rather, we suggest an important regulatory or `channeling'role of Rad5p for the avoidance of non-homologous end joining in the yeast S.cerevisiae .

The postulated role of Rad5p as a `deterrent' against non- homologous end joining was further supported by sequence analysis of the repair junction sites obtained by end joining, which show similarity with those observed in other yeast systems ( 36 , 38 ) and in mammalian cells ( 21 , 39 ). In our system, the single-stranded overhangs (PSS) introduced by the Apa I and Nco I restriction digests are non-compatible and there is no sequence homology between the two ends. In the rad5 mutants we found no single junction with both 5'- and 3'-PSS being completely intact. We found three different types of junctions: blunt end plus blunt end due to complete loss of both PSS, 5'-PSS plus blunt end and 5'-PSS plus partial 3'-PSS (see Fig. 2 b-g). The complete deletion of the 5'- and 3'-PSS generating blunt ends in the majority of cases (84%) may indicate an increased sensitivity towards nucleolytic degradation of PSS. Blunt ends, however, do not seem to be suitable substrates for further degradation, as indicated by the very low frequency (3%) of deletions extending into the double-stranded end. One can only speculate on whether the Rad1-Rad10 protein complex, an endonuclease cleaving at the junction between duplex DNA and the 3'-PSS ( 71 , 72 ), and the Rad2 protein, cleaving at the junction between duplex DNA and the 5'-PSS ( 73 ), are responsible for modification of the PSS. Non- homologous DNA blunt end joining accompanied by loss of terminal bases has also been reported for Schizosaccharomyces pombe ( 36 ).

In ~10% of cases we found that the 5'-PSS remained intact while the 3'-PSS was deleted. The joining of a 5'-PSS with a blunt end requires fill-in DNA synthesis as envisaged in mammalian cells ( 21 , 26 , 29 ) and in yeast ( 36 , 38 ). In the least abundant category we observed joining of intact 5'-PSS with partially deleted 3'-PSS (Fig. 2 c and d). One or two remaining nucleotides of the 3'-PSS may result either from partial degradation of the 3'-PSS or, possibly, from duplication of the terminal nucleotide, as has been described for mammalian cells ( 9 , 27 , 74 ). Both the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from E.coli and the native Taq DNA polymerase are capable of synthesising across discontinuous templates in vitro ( 75 , 76 ). The joining sequences depicted in Figure 2 f indicate that some yeast polymerase has a similar capacity in vivo . Finally, we found one junction sequence with a single nucleotide (A/T) added to the blunt terminal sequence (Fig. 2 d). This is consistent with previous findings showing rare addition of mostly a single nucleotide for non- homologous end joining. ( 18 , 36 , 37 , 77 ). In our case, this insertion of a single nucleotide was accompanied by deletion of a nucleotide at both blunt ends. DNA polymerase is able to add single nucleotides to blunt-ended DNA in vitro ( 77 ) and possibly is responsible for the insertion of a single nucleotide or a simple duplication in yeast as well.

It should be emphasised that both specific loss of nucleotides at the protruding single-stranded end and a high percentage of end joining are normally not observed in yeast when the conditions for homologous recombination are met.The rad5 mutants are unique and `mammalian cell-like' in that they perform error-prone gap repair by non-homologous end joining three times more frequently than by homologous recombination. Mammalian cells show high frequencies of end joining as opposed to homologous recombination and frequently they also modify DNA ends by terminal deletions and insertion of extra bases at the cleavage site ( 27 ). In yeast end joining of DSB and modification of protruding ends may be related processes and both of these events may be increased in the absence of RAD5 function.

In conclusion, in S.cerevisiae the RAD5 gene product seems to be involved in maintaining a balance which acts in favour of error-free homologous recombination and in disfavour of error-prone non-homologous end joining during DSB and DSG repair in a minichromosome system. The question whether these results concerning the repair of restriction enzyme-mediated gaps are relevant to the repair of radiation-induced DSB in chromosomal DNA will require further investigation. Of special interest will be the identification of genes that control non-homologous end joining of broken chromosomal DNA in yeast and their relationship to RAD5 . One candidate of interest is the HDF1 gene, which mediates DSB repair by some mechanism of illegitimate recombination.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr A. A. Friedl for helpful discussions. We also thank Ms U. Hoffmann and Mrs K. Winkler for skilful technical assistance. The research grants received from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie under the auspices of the Indo-German Collaboration (IN-71) and from the European Communities (CEC FI3P- CT92-007/CEC FI4P-CT95-0010) are thankfully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1 Roth,D.B. and Wilson,J.H. (1988) In Kucherlapati,R. and Smith,G.R. (eds), Genetic Recombination. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp. 621-653.

2 Ward,J.F. (1988) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 35, 95-125.

3 Sperry,A.O., Blasquez,V.C. and Garrard,W.T. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 5497-5501.

4 Aplan,P.D., Lombardi,D.P., Ginsberg,A.M., Cossman,J. Bertness,V.L. and Kirsch,I.R. (1990) Science, 250, 1426-1429.

5 Frankenberg-Schwager,M. and Frankenberg,D. (1990) Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 58, 569-575. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Biederman,K.A., Sun,J.R., Giaccia,A.J., Tasto,L.M. and Brown,J.M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 1394-1398.

7 Petes,T.D., Malone,R.E. and Symington,L.S. (1991) In Broach,J.R., Pringle,J.R. and Johnes,E.W. (eds), The Molecular and Cell Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Genome, Dynamics, Protein Synthesis and Energetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY., pp. 407-522.

8 Kysela,B.P., Michael,B.D. and Arrand,J.E. (1993) Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 63, 609-616.

9 Schiestl,R.H., Zhu,J. and Petes,T.D. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 4493-4500.

10 Derbyshire,M.K., Epstein,L.H., Young,C.S.H., Munz,P.L. and Fishel,R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 156-169.

11 Nicolas,A.L., Munz,P.L. and Young,C.S.H. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 1036-1043.

12 Jeggo,P.A, Tesmer,J. and Chen,D.J. (1991) Mutat. Res., 254, 125-133.

13 Lewis,S.M. (1994) Adv. Immunol., 56, 27-149 MEDLINE Abstract

14 Jeggo,P.A, Taccioli,G.E. and Jackson,S.P. (1995) BioEssays, 17, 949-957.

15 Jackson,S.P. and Jeggo,P.A. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 412-415 MEDLINE Abstract

16 Errami,A., Smider,V., Rathmell,W.K., He,D,M., Hendrickson,E.A, Zdzienicka,M.Z. and Chu,G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol, 16, 1519-1526 MEDLINE Abstract

17 Hartley,K.O., Gell,D., Smith,G.C., Zhang,H., Divecha,N., Connelly,M.A., Admon,A., Lees-Miller,S.P., Anderson,C.W. and Jackson,S.P. (1995) Cell, 82, 849-856 MEDLINE Abstract

18 Roth,D.B., Porter,T.N. and Wilson,J.H. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 2599-2607.

19 Roth,D.B. and Wilson,J.H. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol., 6, 4295-4304.

20 Pfeiffer,P. and Vielmetter,W. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 907-924.

21 Thode,S., Schäfer,A., Pfeiffer,P. and Vielmetter,W. (1990) Cell, 60, 921-928.

22 Lehmann,C.W and Carroll,D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10840-10844.

23 Goedecke,W., Vielmetter,W. and Pfeiffer,P. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 811-816.

24 Thacker,J., Chalk,J., Ganesh,A. and North,P. (1992) Nucleic Acid Res., 20, 6183-6188.

25 Lehmann,C.W., Clemens,M., Worthylake,D.K., Trautmann,J.K. and Carroll,D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 897-906.

26 Pfeiffer,P., Thode,S., Hancke,J. and Vielmetter,W. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 888-895.

27 Philips,J.W. and Morgan,W.F. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 5794-5803.

28 Lehmann,C.W., Trautmann,J.K. and Carroll,D. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 434-442.

29 Pfeiffer,P., Thode,S., Hancke,J., Keohavong,P. and Thilly,W.G. (1994) Mutagenesis, 9, 527-535.

30 Thacker,J. (1989) Mutat. Res., 220, 187-204.

31 Orr-Weaver,T.L. and Szostak,J.W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 80, 4417-4421. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Szostak,J.W., Orr-Weaver,T.L., Rothstein,R.J. and Stahl,F.W. (1983) Cell, 33, 25-35.

33 Resnick,M.A., Zgaga,Z., Hieter,P., Westmoreland,J., Fogel,S. and Nilsson-Tillgren,T. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet., 234, 65-73.

34 Game,J.C. (1993) Semin. Cancer Biol., 4, 73-83.

35 Friedberg,E.C., Walker,G.C. and Siede,W. (1995) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 233-281.

36 Goedecke,W., Pfeiffer,P. and Vielmetter,W. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 2094-2101.

37 Kramer,K.M., Brock,J.A., Bloom,K., Moore,J.K. and Haber,J.E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 1293-1301.

38 Mezard,C. and Nicolas,A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 1278-1292.

39 Nicolas,A.L. and Young,C.S.H., (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 170-180.

40 Siede,W., Friedl,A.A., Dianova,I., Eckardt-Schupp,F. and Friedberg,E.C. (1996) Genetics, 142, 91-102.

41 Mages,G.J., Feldmann,H.M. and Winnacker,E.L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271, 7910-7915 MEDLINE Abstract

42 Game,J.C. (1983) In Spencer,J.F.T., Spencer,D.M. and Smith,A.R.W. (eds), Yeast Genetics: Fundamental and Applied Aspects. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp.109-137.

43 Geigl,E.M. and Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1991) Curr. Genet., 20, 33-37.

44 Ahne,F., Jha,B., Biebel,A. and Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1994) In Chadwick,K.H., Cox,R., Leenhouts,H.B. and Thacker,J. (eds), Molecular Mechanisms in Radiation Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp. 59-64.

45 Kunz,B.A. and Haynes,R.H. (1981) Annu. Rev. Genet., 15, 57-89.

46 Ahne,F., Baur,M. and Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1992) Curr. Genet., 22, 277-282.

47 Johnson,R.I., Henderson,S.T., Petes,T.D., Prakash,S., Bankmann,M. and Prakash,L. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 3807-3818.

48 Johnson,R.I., Prakash,S. and Prakash,L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 28259-28262.

49 Lemontt,J.F. (1971) Genetics, 68, 212-33.

50 Lawrence,C.W. and Christensen,R.B. (1978) Genetics, 90, 213-226.

51 Siede,W. and Brendel,M. (1981) Curr. Genet., 4, 145-149.

52 Siede,W. and Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1986) Mutagenesis, 1, 471-474.

53 Eckardt-Schupp,F. and Ahne,F. (1993) Mutat. Res., 289, 39-46. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Friedl,A.A., Beisker,W., Hahn,K., Eckardt-Schupp,F. and Kellerer,A.M. (1993) Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 63, 173-181.

55 Kraxenberger,A., Friedl,A.A., Kellerer,A.M. (1994) Electrophoresis, 15, 128-136.

56 Friedl,A.A., Kraxenberger,A., Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1995) Methods Companion Methods Enzymol., 7, 205-218.

57 Jha,B., Ahne,F. and Eckardt-Schupp,F. (1993) Curr. Genet., 23, 402-407.

58 Cox,R., Masson,W.K., Debenham,P.G. and Webb,M.B.T. (1984) Br. J. Cancer, 49 (suppl. VI), 67-72.

59 Cox,R., Debenham,P.G., Masson,W.K. and Webb,M.B.T. (1986) Mol. Biol. Med., 3, 229-244.

60 Debenham,P.G., Webb,M.B.T., Strech,A. and Thacker,J. (1988) Mutat. Res., 199, 145-158.

61 Smerdon,M. J. and Thoma,F.(1990) Cell, 61, 675-84.

62 Bedoyan,J., Gupta,R., Thoma,F. and Smerdon,M.J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 5996-6005.

63 Falco,S.C., Rose,M. and Botstein,D. (1983) Genetics, 105, 843-856.

64 Rose,M., Grisafi,P. and Botstein,D. (1984) Gene, 29, 113-124.

65 Ito,H., Fukuda,Y., Murata,K. and Kimura,A. (1983) J. Bacteriol., 153, 167-168.

66 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

67 Robzyk,K. and Kassir,Y. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 3790. MEDLINE Abstract

68 Boulton,S.J. and Jackson,S.P. (1996) EMBO J., 18, 5093-5103.

69 Bouffler,S.D., Jha,B. and Johnson,R.T. (1990) Somatic Cell Mol. Genet., 16, 451-460.

70 Priebe,S.D., Westmoreland,J, Nilsson-Tillgren,T. and Resnick,M.A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 4802-4814.

71 Bardwell,A.J., Bardwell,L., Tomkinson,A.E. and Friedberg,E.C. (1994) Science, 265, 2082-2085.

72 Ivanov,L. and Haber,J.E. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 2245-2251.

73 Harrington,J.J. and Lieber,M.L. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 1344-1355.

74 Schiestl,R.H. and Petes,T.D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 7585-7589.

75 Clark,J.M. (1991) Gene, 104, 75-80.

76 King,J.S., Fairley,C.F. and Morgan,W.F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 13061-13064.

77 Clark,J.M. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 9677-9686.


Return

*To whom correspondence should be adressed. Tel: +49 89 3187 4101; Fax: +49 89 3187 3381; Email: eckardt-schupp@gsf.de
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
I-P. Chen, A. Mannuss, N. Orel, F. Heitzeberg, and H. Puchta
A Homolog of ScRAD5 Is Involved in DNA Repair and Homologous Recombination in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1786 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Durr, A. Flaus, T. Owen-Hughes, and K.-P. Hopfner
Snf2 family ATPases and DExx box helicases: differences and unifying concepts from high-resolution crystal structures
Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4160 - 4167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. Frampton, A. Irmisch, C. M. Green, A. Neiss, M. Trickey, H. D. Ulrich, K. Furuya, F. Z. Watts, A. M. Carr, and A. R. Lehmann
Postreplication Repair and PCNA Modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2006; 17(7): 2976 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Chen, A. A. Davies, D. Sagan, and H. D. Ulrich
The RING finger ATPase Rad5p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in a ubiquitin-independent manner
Nucleic Acids Res., October 13, 2005; 33(18): 5878 - 5886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. A. Saffran, S. Ahmed, S. Bellevue, G. Pereira, T. Patrick, W. Sanchez, S. Thomas, M. Alberti, and J. E. Hearst
DNA Repair Defects Channel Interstrand DNA Cross-links into Alternate Recombinational and Error-prone Repair Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36462 - 36469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Chang, M. Bellaoui, C. Boone, and G. W. Brown
A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage
PNAS, December 24, 2002; 99(26): 16934 - 16939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kiechle, P. Manivasakam, F. Eckardt-Schupp, R. H. Schiestl, and A. A. Friedl
Promoter-trapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by radiation-assisted fragment insertion
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2002; 30(24): e136 - e136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kiakos, T. T. Howard, M. Lee, J. A. Hartley, and P. J. McHugh
Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5 Influences the Excision Repair of DNA Minor Groove Adducts
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44576 - 44581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. E. Wilson
A Genomics-Based Screen for Yeast Mutants With an Altered Recombination/End-Joining Repair Ratio
Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 677 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. A. Clikeman, G. J. Khalsa, S. L. Barton, and J. A. Nickoloff
Homologous Recombinational Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast Is Enhanced by MAT Heterozygosity Through yKU-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 579 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
W. Xiao, B. L. Chow, S. Broomfield, and M. Hanna
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 Group Is Composed of an Error-Prone and Two Error-Free Postreplication Repair Pathways
Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1633 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. Hegde and H. Klein
Requirement for the SRS2 DNA helicase gene in non-homologous end joining in yeast
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2000; 28(14): 2779 - 2783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. J. McHugh, W. R. Sones, and J. A. Hartley
Repair of Intermediate Structures Produced at DNA Interstrand Cross-Links in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2000; 20(10): 3425 - 3433.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. K. Lewis, J. W. Westmoreland, and M. A. Resnick
Repair of Endonuclease-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Essential Role for Genes Associated with Nonhomologous End-Joining
Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1513 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
F. Paques and J. E. Haber
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 63(2): 349 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. C. Game and P. D. Kaufman
Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromatin Assembly Factor-I in Repair of Ultraviolet Radiation Damage in Vivo
Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 485 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (110K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt-Schupp, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt-Schupp, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?