Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (161K) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cain, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Glick, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cain, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Glick, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 836-842

Footnote

The effect of cross-links on the conformational dynamics of duplex DNA

The effect of cross-links on the conformational dynamics of duplex DNA Robert J. Cain and Gary D. Glick*

University of Michigan, Department of Chemistry, Ann Arbor , MI 48109-1055, USA

Received October 8, 1996; Revised and Accepted December 12, 1996

ABSTRACT

The base pair lifetimes and apparent dissociation constants of a 21 base DNA hairpin and an analog possessing a disulfide cross-link bridging the 3 ' - and 5 '-terminal bases were determined by measuring imino proton exchange rates as a function of exchange catalyst concentration and temperature. A comparison of the lifetimes and apparent dissociation constants for corresponding base pairs of the two hairpins indicates that the cross-link neither increases the number of base pairs involved in fraying nor alters the lifetime, dissociation constant, or the opened structure from which exchange occurs for the base pairs that are not frayed. The cross-link does, however, stabilize the frayed penultimate base pair of the stem duplex. Significantly, it appears that the disulfide cross-link is more effective at preventing fraying of the penultimate base pair than is the 5 base hairpin loop. Because this disulfide cross-link can be incorporated site specifically, and does not adversely affect static or dynamic properties of DNA, it should prove very useful in studies of nucleic acid structure and function.

INTRODUCTION

The static structure of DNA can explain many aspects of its function and properties ( 1 ). However, local base pair opening is implicated in a number of important chemical, biological, and mechanical processes that involve DNA ( 2 - 5 ). Hence, defining the dynamics of base pair opening is necessary to fully understand the physicochemical and biological properties of DNA. Information on the opening and dynamics of individual base pairs within DNA secondary structures can be obtained through proton exchange measurements on small oligonucleotides ( 6 ).

As isolated nucleosides, the pKa values for the N1 proton of guanosine and the N3 proton of thymidine are 9.2 and 9.6, respectively ( 7 ). The basic (or unprotonated) form of buffers with pKa values approaching that of these imino protons are therefore effective exchange catalysts ( 6 , 8 ). Guéron and coworkers showed that imino protons exchange from duplex DNA at rates that are catalyst dependent and developed a theoretical framework to extract base pair lifetimes and equilibrium constants from measured exchange rates ( 6 , 8 ). For example, consider a dA:dT base pair:cpile {{{roman A} : H {roman T}} above "(closed state)"} cpile {{1 / {tau sub 0}} above leftrightarrows above roman {k sub {c l}}} cpile {{{roman {A +}} H {roman T}} above "(open state)"} {roman {{^ K} sub D}} {back 23 {{roman =} {back 23 {{roman {{1 / ( tau} sub 0}} {back 31 {{roman cdot} {back 15 {{roman {{k sub {c l}} )}} {back 15 {= {back 23 {{roman "[open state]"} over roman "[closed state]"}}}}}}}}}}}} 1

where [tau]0 is the base pair lifetime, kcl is the closing rate constant, and H is the exchangeable imino proton. The thymidine imino proton will exchange from the open state at a rate, 1/[tau]ex,open : A + H T " " cpile {{1 / {tau sub {e x , o p e n}}} above ->} A + H T 2

For KD << 1 (a stable base pair) the proton exchange time, [tau]ex , is given by: [tau]ex = [tau]0 + [tau]ex,open /F 3

where F is the fraction of time the nucleotide is in the open state. The imino proton of an isolated nucleoside will exhibit an exchange time, [tau]i , that can be related to [tau]ex,open by introducing a factor [alpha], where [alpha] = [tau]i /[tau]ex,open . The factor [alpha] reflects the relative accessibility to exchange catalyst of an imino proton in an isolated nucleoside versus an imino proton in an opened base pair. The fraction of nucleotide in the open state can be calculated by, F = ( K D / K D +1). Equation 3 can therefore be expanded: [tau]ex = [tau]0 + [tau]i (1 + K D )/[alpha] K D 4

Proton exchange catalyst concentration, [cat], is inversely proportional to [tau]i , so that a plot of [tau]ex versus 1/[cat] affords a straight line that extrapolates to [tau]0 at infinite [cat]. For an isolated nucleoside, where [tau]ex = [tau]i , such a plot extrapolates to zero at infinite [cat]. For K D << 1, the ratio of slopes for an isolated nucleoside and a base pair is equal to [alpha] K D , the apparent dissociation constant ( 6 , 8 ). When comparing base pairs of the same type (i.e., dA:dT or dG:dC) the ratios of slopes yield the ratio of the apparent dissociation constants since the relevant exchange time, [tau]i , is the same for base pairs of the same type.

Base pair lifetimes on the order of seconds have been observed for highly stabilized structures like Z-DNA ( 9 ), while unstable constructs such as mismatched base pairs exhibit base pair lifetimes <1 ms ( 10 ). In some cases, measurement of base pair opening has been used to probe for local DNA structural perturbations within DNA ( 11 , 12 ). Although the opening dynamics for several different constructs have been measured ( 13 - 22 ), the opening kinetics for oligonucleotides constrained with cross-links (e.g., hairpin loops, glycol bridges, etc.) have not been reported. Indeed, cross-linked nucleic acids are becoming increasingly important in a number of applications to overcome the limitations imposed when using short oligonucleotides as models of high molecular weight nucleic acids ( 23 - 28 ). Our laboratory has developed a general strategy for conformationally restraining nucleic acids through the site-specific incorporation of disulfide cross-links bridging the 3' and 5'-terminal bases of duplex DNA ( 29 - 32 ). Previous studies have described the chemical, in vitro biological, and thermodynamic consequences of modifying DNA with our cross-link ( 33 - 37 ). Of particular importance, UV, CD and NMR experiments demonstrate that our disulfide cross-link does not perturb the static structure of duplex DNA ( 32 , 33 , 36 , 38 - 40 ).

A comprehensive understanding of the structural consequences of incorporating cross-links into nucleic acids requires knowledge of how the linker affects base pair opening. Such information is important because base pair opening is involved in the mechanical properties of DNA ( 2 , 3 ), several chemical reactions of DNA ( 4 ), and a variety of biological processes ( 5 ). To determine how our disulfide cross-link affects the dynamics of duplex DNA, the base pair lifetimes and apparent dissociation constants of a 21 base DNA hairpin and an analog possessing our disulfide cross-link (Fig. 1 ) were determined by measuring imino proton exchange rates as a function of exchange catalyst concentration and temperature. This system was selected for these experiments because the structures of 1 and 2 are isomorphous as determined by NMR ( 38 ), and hairpin loops are the most common way to stabilize DNA/RNA duplexes ( 41 - 43 ). Moreover, incorporating both a loop and the disulfide modification within the same molecule should allow the assessment of which `cross-link' is better at stabilizing DNA. We find that the disulfide cross-link in 2 does not alter the base pair opening rates or the equilibrium constants for base pairs that are not frayed as compared with the corresponding base pairs in 1 . Significantly, it appears that the disulfide cross-link is more effective at preventing fraying than is the 5 base hairpin loop.


Figure 1 . Sequences of 1 and 2 and the chemical structure of the cross-link. The base pair numbering scheme is indicated next to the sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation

Hairpins 1 and 2 were synthesized and purified as described previously ( 38 ). Samples were ion exchanged by equilibrating in NaCl (4 M) solution for 36 h and desalted on a Vydac C4 column eluting with water. DNA samples were lyophilized and dissolved in Tris buffer (5.0 mM) containing NaCl (50 mM), EDTA (2 mM) and 10% D2 O at pH 7.9. The conductivity of each sample was measured using an Orion model 50 conductivity meter.

Tris buffer concentrations were varied by addition of a stock solution of Tris (0.93 M) in NaCl (50 mM), EDTA (2 mM) and 10% D2 O. The pH was adjusted with NaOH (1 M) or HCl (1 M) and measured with a microelectrode (Microelectrodes, Inc. MI-412) inside the NMR tube at 22.4oC before and after each NMR experiment. Before each experiment the samples were heated in 95oC water for 30 s and reannealed by slow cooling to room temperature. The samples were kept under nitrogen during the NMR experiments. The concentration of the unprotonated, exchange catalyst form of Tris, [cat], was calculated according to: [cat] = [B]/(1 + 10(pKa-pH) ) 5

where [B] is the total Tris concentration, and the pKa of the Tris was determined by titration at 22.4oC ( 44 ). The variation of pH with temperature was calculated according to a Tris pKa change of -0.031 [Delta]pKa /oC ( 45 ).

NMR measurements

NMR Spectra were measured on an Bruker AMX500 operating at 500 MHz. Spectra were analyzed using FELIX versions 2.3 and 95.0 (BIOSYM Technologies). The proton longitudinal relaxation times were measured using the inversion recovery technique. An I-BURP ( 46 ) pulse (4 ms) was used for the selective inversion of the imino protons. The water signal was suppressed with a 1-1 read pulse ( 47 ). For each T1 measurement 16-20 values for the recovery delay were used.

The intensities at each delay time were measured by fitting the spectra to a set of Lorentzian peaks. For each inversion recovery series the spectrum measured using the longest delay time was fit first. The linewidths and peak positions were then held constant in subsequently fitting peaks to the spectra measured with shorter delay times. As the catalyst concentrations were increased, the resonances became progressively exchange broadened making it impossible to measure the relaxation times of some of the resonances at high temperatures and exchange catalyst concentrations.

To determine T1 values, plots of peak area versus delay time were fit to equation 6: I = I0 (1 - 2 e-(t-[tau]0)/T1) 6

where I is the peak area at each delay time, t is the delay time, I 0 is the area of the fully recovered peak, and [tau]0 is a delay value used to compensate for incompletely inverted magnetization ( 6 , 8 ). The exchange times were then determined according to the equation: 1/ T l = 1/[tau]ex + 1/ T laac 7

where T l is the longitudinal relaxation time measured at a given catalyst concentration, T 1aac is the longitudinal relaxation time measured without any added exchange catalyst, and [tau]ex is the proton exchange time at the given catalyst concentration ( 48 ). The use of T1 measurements rather than linewidth measurements for the exchange time calculations has been shown to help diminish the effect of increased catalyst concentration on the dipolar relaxation rate ( 49 ).

The opening rates for individual protons were determined by fitting plots of [tau]ex versus 1/[cat] to a straight line. Several data points at very low catalyst concentration did not lie on the fitting line and were excluded from the fitting for each imino proton. The slopes of the lines were used to determine apparent dissociation constants in accordance with equation 3.

RESULTS

The base pair opening kinetics of 1 and 2 were studied by measuring selective T1 times of the imino proton resonances shown in Figure 2 as a function of exchange catalyst concentration. A representative selective T1 series is presented in Figure 3 . The imino resonances of 1 at various catalyst concentrations demonstrate the effect of increased catalyst concentration; line broadening is clearly evident due to enhanced proton exchange catalyzed by the protonated form of the Tris buffer (Fig. 4 ). The variation of exchange time ([tau]ex ) with inverse catalyst concentration for the imino protons at 10, 20 and 30oC is shown in Figure 5 , and the extrapolated values of [tau]0 along with the ratio of the apparent dissociation constants for corresponding base pairs of hairpins 1 and 2 are presented in Table 1 . As seen in Table 1 the [tau]0 values are similar to those measured for other B-DNA duplexes ( 6 , 8 - 10 , 13 - 22 ). Because the imino protons for base pairs 2 and 6 of hairpin 2 are severely overlapped, separate opening rates could not be measured.


Figure 2. Imino proton spectra of 1 and 2 in 5 mM Tris buffer at 10oC. Each peak is labeled in italics with the base pair containing that imino resonance. The dA1:dT21 base pair of 1 is not observed because the dT21 imino proton is broadened due to terminal base pair fraying.

Table 1 Base pair lifetimes and ratios of apparent dissociation constants for hairpins 1 and 2 at 10, 20 and 30oC(-) denotes that the value could not be determined due to resonance overlap or excessively broad lines.


Figure 3 . (A) Representative selective T1 series for hairpin 1 (10oC, pH 8.34). The concentration of the unprotonated form of Tris, calculated according to equation 5, is 9.0 * 10-6 M. The imino traces are labeled according to base pair number. The recovery time after inversion is indicated to the left of each trace. Only half the spectra collected are shown for clarity. (B) Plot of fitted peak areas versus recovery time. The lines are fitted to equation 7. The data points and fitting lines are labeled as follows: base pair 1, (open diamond) ; base pair 2, (plus sign); base pair 3, (open square); base pair 4 (open circle); base pair 5, (open triangle); base pair 6, (*); base pair 7 (open inverted triangle). Under conditions that lead to very broad resonances (high [cat], high temperature) some peaks could not be fit adequately due to signal to noise, increased overlap and broadening into the baseline. In these cases, no T1 can be reported. In all cases the data fit equation 7 with no evidence of multiexponential recovery.


Figure 4 . Plots of the imino resonances of 1 at various concentrations of the exchange catalyst (unprotonated) form of Tris. Catalyst concentration is indicated to the left of each plot. The base pairs numbers are indicated above the peaks.


Figure 5 . Variation of imino proton exchange time with inverse catalyst concentration. The error bars indicate the propagated error based on the errors in measuring T1 . The curves are straight lines fit to the data with the data weighted according to 1/ s 2 , where s is the error associated with each [tau]ex value. This fitting scheme was used to derive the slopes. To derive the intercepts the data were weighted according to 1/[cat]. Throughout this figure, open symbols designate results for hairpin 1 and symbols containing * designate results for hairpin 2 . The plots for the base pairs 3-5 at 10, 20 and 30oC are presented in ( A ), ( B ) and ( C ), respectively. Base pairs 3, 4 and 5 are designated by squares, circles and diamonds, respectively. Curve fits for hairpin 1 are solid, while those for hairpin 2 are dashed. Plots for base pairs 1 and 7 at 10oC are shown in ( D ). Base pair 7 is designated by squares and base pair 1 is designated by circles. The exchange times of base pairs 1 and 7 could not be determined at high exchange catalyst concentration due to exchange broadening.



The lifetime for base pairs 3-5 in 1 are within error of the corresponding base pairs in 2 at 10, 20 and 30oC. At 30oC these lifetimes approach zero which lessens the utility of comparing opening rates at this temperature. However, the ratios of apparent dissociation constants can be measured accurately for the corresponding base pairs in both 1 and 2 at all three temperatures. These ratios are all within error of 1.0, as can easily be seen by comparing the slopes of the plots shown in Figure 5 A-C. These results suggest that the apparent dissociation constants are the same for these base pairs at all three temperatures.

Base pairs 1 and 7, of both 1 and 2 contain imino proton resonances that broaden more than the other resonances in response to increased temperature and exchange catalyst concentration (Fig. 4 ) which reflects fraying at these positions ( 6 , 50 ). Fewer selective T1 values of these imino protons could be measured due to this fraying which makes comparison of apparent dissociation constants impossible above 10oC. For base pair 7, which is adjacent to the loop, the lifetimes are <2 ms for both 1 and 2 at each temperature studied. The ratio of apparent dissociation constants of base pair 7 of 1 and 2 is within error of 1 at 10oC, while at higher temperature this ratio cannot be measured. In contrast to base pair 7, for base pair 1 there is a clear difference in the base pair opening kinetics of 1 and 2 . The extrapolated value for [tau]0 is higher for 1 than 2 . The measured ratios of apparent dissociation constants of 1 relative to 2 at 10oC indicates that for base pair 1 the apparent dissociation constant for 1 is higher by a factor of ~3.

Exchange rate studies >30oC are not practical for 1 and 2 because the proton exchange rates become too fast. Thermal denaturation studies are useful for studying base pair breathing under these conditions but they are less sensitive and do not yield base pair lifetimes or dissociation constants. Given these limitations, melting studies of 1 and 2 were performed. The imino protons of 1 that are adjacent to the terminal base pair and adjacent to the loop (peaks 1 and 7) begin to broaden at 40oC (Fig. 6 ). For 2 , only the imino proton adjacent to the loop broadens at 40oC, while the imino proton adjacent to the cross-link remains narrow at this temperature. These results suggest that the cross-link inhibits fraying at 40oC. At 10oC the chemical shifts of the corresponding imino proton from base pairs 4-7 of 1 and 2 are within error while the imino resonances of base pairs 1, 2 and 3 are shifted downfield in 2 relative to 1 by 0.25, 0.12, and 0.06 p.p.m., respectively. Within experimental error, this pattern of imino chemical shift changes in 2 relative to 1 remains unchanged up to 40oC. It is unlikely that the shift differences in 2 are due mostly to ring current effects since the chemical shifts of the other protons on 1 and 2 are not changed as much by the cross-link. Thus, it appears that the hydrogen bonds for the terminal few base pairs of 2 are strengthened by the cross-link, a hypothesis consistent with the lower apparent K D found for the dG2:dC20 base pair.

DISCUSSION

Previous NMR experiments have demonstrated that the disulfide cross-link does not perturb the static structure of 1 relative to 2 ( 38 ). The goal of this study was to determine how the base pair opening rates (i.e., the `dynamic structure') are affected by the cross-link. In the context of this work, it is important to distinguish between two modes of base pair opening. Base pairs distant from the termini in B-form DNA appear to open individually ( 6 , 8 ), while the base pairs near the termini open cooperatively due to fraying ( 51 ). As a result of fraying, imino proton exchange times increase with distance from the termini, and typically reach a `bulk' rate at the fourth base pair from the end of a duplex ( 50 , 52 , 53 ). Since our cross-link is at the terminus of a duplex, we investigated fraying as well as `bulk' base pair opening for each base pair of 1 and 2 .

If our cross-link is destabilizing, base pairs in the stem duplex of 2 should exhibit decreased [tau]0 and increased K D relative to the corresponding base pairs of 1 . The destabilizing effect could extend throughout the stem or be limited to the base pairs closest to the cross-link which would be indicative of increased base pair fraying. In contrast, a stabilizing cross-link would decrease terminal fraying and would be manifested by increased [tau]0 and decreased K D for the terminal residues of 2 relative to the corresponding positions of 1 . The cross-link could also leave base pair fraying unaffected which would result in identical [tau]0 and K D for all of the corresponding base pairs of 1 and 2 . Because the extent of fraying changes with temperature, it was anticipated that the effect of the cross-link on the stability of corresponding base pairs could also change with temperature.

Base pairs 3-7

Within experimental error, the lifetimes and apparent dissociation constants for base pairs 3-5 of hairpins 1 and 2 are identical at 10, 20 and 30oC. Since both the lifetimes and dissociation constants are the same for the corresponding base pairs in position 3-5, the closing rates, kcl , must also be the same [see equation 1]. Furthermore because the [alpha] factors of corresponding base pairs are the same, the exchange time for the nucleotides in the open states, [tau]ex,open, must be identical since [alpha] = [tau]i /[tau]ex,open . This latter point suggests that the open states themselves are identical. These findings, in conjunction with our earlier structural data ( 38 - 40 ), show that the process of base pair opening including the closed state, transition state of opening and closing, and the opened structure from which proton exchange occurs, are the same for base pairs 3, 4 and 5 in hairpin 1 and its disulfide cross-linked analog.

Base pairs 7 in 1 and 2 are adjacent to loops and are frayed. The apparent dissociation constant at 10oC is identical for both hairpins, the only temperature at which an apparent dissociation constant could be measured for this position. However, the melting experiments suggest that the thermal denaturation pathway of base pair 7 of 1 and 2 is identical up to 40oC (Fig. 3 ). The results here indicate that the cross-linked thymidines do not affect the opening dynamics for base pairs 3-7 in 2 .

Base pairs 1 and 2

Although the terminal base pairs in duplex DNA possess a high K D relative to the other base pairs, they protect penultimate base pairs from fraying ( 51 ). Simple models of fraying propose that when the terminal base pair is closed it protects the penultimate base pair, but when the terminal base pair is open the penultimate base pair is unprotected and exhibits a large K D ( 50 ). Comparing the opening properties of base pair 1 of hairpins 1 and 2 therefore allows for the investigation of how well the N3 cross-linked thymidines at the bottom of hairpin 2 mimic the dA:dT base pair at the bottom of hairpin 1 in protecting the adjacent base pair.

Because there is no `closed state' available to the N3 cross-linked thymidines, protection of the base pairs in position 1 of 1 and 2 must occur by a different process relative to a dA:dT base pair. In addition, the open states of base pair 1 of 1 and 2 must also differ significantly because the frayed open state of base pair 1 of 2 is covalently constrained. Thus, the open state accessibility of the imino protons in position 1 of 1 and 2 may differ greatly, leading to different values of [alpha] for those imino protons. While [alpha] factors in other DNA oligomers and complexes are often presumed to approximate unity when ammonia is used as an exchange catalyst, that assumption cannot be made here, especially since [alpha] factors that differ by a factor of three have been measured with different exchange catalysts ( 6 , 8 ). These differences make interpretation of apparent dissociation constants ([alpha] K D values) difficult for base pair 1 of 1 and 2 .


Figure 6 . NMR melting study of hairpins 1 and 2. The spectra were measured in 5.9 mM Tris buffer. The peaks are labeled according to the base pair of the imino proton.

In this context, it is remarkable how similar the opening dynamics for base pair 1 of hairpin 1 and 2 appear to be. At 10oC the lifetimes of base pair 1 in both hairpins are within error and the apparent dissociation constant for 2 is lower by a factor of only three. The difference in apparent dissociation constants for base pair 1 must result from a difference in K D , [alpha], or some combination of both. As mentioned above, there is good reason to suppose that the [alpha] factors of these base pairs differ. Therefore, we cannot precisely determine by what factor the dissociation constants differ for base pair 1 of 1 and 2 .

At 20 and 30oC the exchange characteristics for base pair 1 of 1 and 2 appears similar with short lifetimes exhibited by both. Because imino proton exchange becomes so fast for these base pairs at these temperatures, the resultant linewidths are broad and only a few exchange times at low catalyst concentration could be measured. A quantitative comparison of apparent dissociation constants is therefore impossible at these temperatures. However, it is clear from the melting study that at 40oC base pair 1 of 2 is more stable than base pair 1 of 1 . Apparently the N3 cross-linked thymidines of 2 are more effective than the terminal dA:dT base pair of 1 at inhibiting fraying of the adjacent base pair.

Implications for the cross-link: stabilization of the stem duplex by the hairpin loop versus the disulfide cross-link

Incorporation of a loop on the end of a duplex is the most common method for stabilizing nucleic acid duplexes ( 41 - 43 ). Examination of the melting curves of 1 and 2 allows for a qualitative evaluation of the relative stabilizing effect of the d(CATTT) loop and the N3 cross-linked thymidines. In hairpin 1 the imino protons of base pairs 1 and 7 broaden to a similar extent as a function of temperature, while in hairpin 2 the imino proton of base pair 1 is broadened to a far lesser extent at 40oC. From these data we conclude that the d(CATTT) loop is less effective at stabilizing the stem duplex than the cross-linked thymidines. Since our disulfide cross-link does not significantly alter dynamic or static structure of duplex DNA, can be easily incorporated into oligonucleotides, is much smaller relative to hairpin loops, and the chemical, in vitro biological and thermodynamic consequences of constraining DNA with this modification are established ( 26 , 29 - 40 ), use of this modification in nucleic acid structure-functions studies should see increased use.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Supported by NIH Grant GM 52831. G.D.G. is the recipient of a National Arthritis Foundation Arthritis Investigator Award, an American Cancer Society Junior Faculty Research Award, a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award, and a Research Fellowship from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

REFERENCES

1 Saenger W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer Verlag, New York.

2 Ramstein, J. and Lavery, R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 7231-7235.

3 Ramstein, J. and Lavery, R. (1990) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 7, 915-933. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D. (1985) In Clementi, E., Corongiu, G., Sarma, M. H. and Sarma, R. H. (eds), Structure & Motion: Membranes, Nucleic Acids, and Proteins. Adenine Press, Guilderland, N.Y., pp 417-432.

5 Tari, L. W. and Secco, A. S. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 2065-2073.

6 Guéron, M. and Leroy, J. L. (1995) Methods Enzymol., 261, 383-413.

7 Ts'o, P. O. P. (1974) Basic Principles in Nucleic Acid Chemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 462.

8 Leroy, J. L., Kochoyan, M., Huynh-Dinh, T. and Guéron, M. (1988) J. Mol. Biol., 200, 223-238.

9 Kochoyan, M., Leroy, J. L. and Guéron, M. (1990) Biochemistry, 29, 4799-4805.

10 Moe, J. G. and Russu, I. M. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 8421-8428.

11 Leroy, J-L, Charretier, E., Kochoyan, M. and Guéron, M. (1988) Biochemistry, 27, 8894-8898.

12 Moe, J.G. and Russu, I.M. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 821-827.

13 Leroy, J. L., Gao, X., Guéron, M. and Patel, D. J. (1991) Biochemistry, 30, 5653-5661.

14 Leroy, J. L., Gao, X., Misra, V., Guéron, M. and Patel, D. J. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 1407-1415.

15 Goljer, I., Withka, J. M., Kao, J. Y. and Bolton, P. H. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 11614-11619.

16 Maltseva, T. V., Zarytova, V. F. and Chattopadhyaya, J. (1995) J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 30, 163-177.

17 Leroy, J. L., Broseta, D. and Guéron, M. (1985) J. Mol. Biol., 184, 165-178.

18 Leroy, J. L., Bolo, N., Figueroa, N., Plateau, P. and Guéron, M. (1985) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 2, 915-939.

19 Varani, G., Wimberly, B. and Tinoco, Jr., I. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 7760-7772.

20 Leroy, J. L., Gehring, K., Kettani, A. and Guéron, M. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 6019-6031.

21 Fawthrop, S. A., Yang, J. C. and Fisher, J. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4860-4866.

22 Leijon, M., Zdunek, J., Fritzsche, H., Sklenar, H. and GrSslund, A. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem., 234, 832-842.

23 Erie, D., Sinha, N., Olson, W., Jones, R. and Breslauer, K. (1987) Biochemistry, 26, 7150-7159.

24 Erie, D. A., Jones, R. A., Olson, W. K., Sinha, N. K. and Breslauer, K. J. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 268-273.

25 Doktycz, M. J., Goldstein, R. F., Paner, T. M., Gallo, F. J. and Benight, A. S. (1992) Biopolymers, 32, 849-864.

26 Stevens, S. Y., Swanson, P. C., Voss, Jr., E.W. and Glick, G. D. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 1585-1586.

27 Ma, M. Y.-X., McCallum, K., Climie, S. C., Kuperman, R., Lin, W. C., Summer-Smith, M. and Barnett, R. W. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 2585-2589.

28 Ma, M. Y.-X., Reid, L. S., Climie, S. C., Lin, W. C., Kuperman, R., Summer-Smith, M. and Barnett, R. W. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 1751-1758.

29 Glick, G. D. (1991) J. Org. Chem., 56, 6746-6747.

30 Glick, G. D., Osborne, S. E., Knitt, D. S. and Marino, J. P. Jr (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 5447-5448.

31 Goodwin, J. T., Osborne, S. E., Swanson, P. C. and Glick, G. D. (1994) Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 4527-4530.

32 Osborne, S. E., Cain, R. J., Goodwin, J. T., Stevens, S. Y., Wang, H., Zuiderweg, E. R. P. and Glick, G. D. (1996) In Sarma,R.H. and Sarma,M.H. (eds), Biological Structure and Dynamics: Proceedings of the Ninth Conversation in the Discipline Biomolecular Stereodynamics. Volume 2. Adenine Press, New York, pp 217-234.

33 Osborne, S. E., Vslker, J., Stevens, S. Y., Breslauer, K. J. and Glick, G. D. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press.

34 Swanson, P. C., Cooper, B. C. and Glick, G. D. (1994) J. Immunol., 152, 2601-2612.

35 Swanson, P. C. and Glick, G. D. (1993) BioMed. Chem. Lett., 3, 2117-2118.

36 Osborne, S. E., Völker, J., Stevens, S. Y., Breslauer, K. J. and Glick, G. D. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 11993-12003.

37 Vslker, J., Osborne, S.E., Glick, G.D. and Breslauer, K.J. (1997) Biochemistry, in press.

38 Cain, R. J., Zuiderweg, E. R. P. and Glick, G. D. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 2153-2160.

39 Wang, H., Osborne, S. E., Zuiderweg, E. R. P. and Glick, G. D. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 5021-5022.

40 Wang, H., Zuiderweg, E. R. P. and Glick, G. D. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 2981-2991.

41 Hilbers, C. W., Heus, H. A., Van Dongen, M. J. P. and Wijmenga, S. S. (1994) In Eckstein, F. and Lilley, D. M. J., (eds), Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 56-104.

42 Varani, G. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 24, 379-404.

43 Antao, V. P., Lai, S. Y. and Tinoco, Jr., I. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 5901-5905.

44 Voet, D. and Voet, J. G. (1990) Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 35-40.

45 Gueffroy, D. E. (1975) Buffers: A Guide for the Preparation and Use of Buffers in Biological Systems, Calbiochem, pp 16.

46 Geen, H. and Freeman, R. (1991) J. Magn. Reson., 93, 93-141.

47 Plateau, P. and Guéron, M. (1982) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 7310-7311.

48 GYnther, H. (1995) NMR Spectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 346-348.

49 Folta-Stogniew, E. and Russu, I.M. (1996) Biochemistry, 35, 8439-8449. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Patel, D. J. and Hilbers, C. W. (1975) Biochemistry, 14, 2651-2656.

51 Nonin, S., Leroy, J. L. and Gu´ron, M. (1995) Biochemistry, 34, 10652-10659.

52 Early, T. A., Kearns, D. R., Hillen, W. and Wells, R. D. (1981) Biochemistry, 20, 3756-3764.

53 Leijon, M. and Graslund, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5339-5343.


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 313 764 4548; Fax: +1 313 764 8815; Email: gglick@umich.edu
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (161K) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cain, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Glick, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cain, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Glick, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?