Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (49K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 1305-1306

Footnote

A reliable external control for ribonuclease protection assays

A reliable external control for ribonuclease protection assays Prudence A. E. Scott , K. Smith , Roy Bicknel and A. L. Harris*

Molecular Angiogenesis Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

Received January 2, 1997; Accepted February 3, 1997

ABSTRACT

A method is described for generating an external spiked human RNA control to enhance the reliability of assessment of gene expression in tumour extracts. Spiking with an external standard RNA controls for all subsequent steps of analysis on a lane by lane basis and allows for uniform comparison of the gene of interest as a fraction of total RNA, particularly when multiple samples are not available. The antisense probe that is being used to detect endogenous gene expression is also used as an external control. A sense riboprobe is made from the same vector. Because of the flanking RNA polymerase sites incorporated in both probes, hybridization with the sense riboprobe at a much lower concentration than the antisense probe generates a larger product that can be readily separated from the endogenous protected fragment. This method is generally applicable to any riboprobe that has a T3 and T7 RNA polymerase site and allows any externally added riboprobe use for assessing endogenous gene expression to be used as the external spike control.

Ribonuclease protection assays are commonly used to assess quantitative expression of genes in human cancer and relate tumour biology to gene expression. To standardise for unequal sample extraction, measuring levels of an internal control gene co-expressed in the sample offers a means of ensuring that equal amounts of each sample are recovered, as well as equal amounts are loaded and detected during the subsequent biochemical analysis. Variation in the level of the internal control may be due to poor extraction or losses within the experiment after the initial aliquotting of the RNA. This requires that the internal control gene be expressed at a constant level under all conditions, and one used frequently is glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) ( 1 - 5 ). Several problems exist in the use of GAPDH as an internal control, particularly for measuring gene expression in RNA extracted from tumours. GAPDH is known to be regulated in a biphasic manner during the cell cycle where 19-fold variations in mRNA have been observed ( 6 ). It is regulated by a number of factors including cellular proliferation ( 7 ), hypoxia ( 8 ), dihydroxyvitamin D in breast carcinoma cells ( 9 ) and by hormones such as dexamethasone in vivo ( 10 ).

An external control could be used as an additional way to assess gene expression quantiatively. Spiking with an external standard mRNA after extraction would control for all subsequent steps of analysis on a lane-by-lane basis. Thus, samples with low internal standard gene expression could be due to low expression in the tumour, degradation during extraction or losses in the experiment. Use of the spike control would show if low expression is due to a step subsequent to extraction. The RNA loading is already standardised by spectrophotometry and ethidium bromide staining of RNA samples run on gels first. If the level of the spike control was uniform and the internal control was low this would suggest endogenous variation of the internal control mRNA. Since multiple samples are not available for repeated extractions and comparisons in primary tumours or many human samples, the use of the spike control allows for a uniform comparison of expression of the gene of interest as a fraction of total RNA.

In order to use both the endogenous control gene and the external spike control with the minimum number of different probes we have developed a method that utilises the existence of two RNA polymerases within most vectors. When an antisense riboprobe is transcribed from the DNA construct, in addition to the insert that is transcribed, the vector sequence between the RNA polymerase and the start of the insert is also transcribed. Most common vectors have two RNA polymerases flanking either side of the polycloning site-T7 and T3 RNA polymerases in the case of Bluescript. The first strand of, for example, the GAPDH riboprobe is generated by linearising the Bluescript/GAPDH construct at the 5' end (or amino-terminus) of the insert with Hin dIII and transcribing from the opposite end with the T3 RNA polymerase to form an antisense strand for probing endogenous mRNA (a protected fragment size of 120 bases). By linearising the 3' end of the insert and using the T7 RNA polymerase, a complementary sense strand is formed which hybridises to the first probe generated, and also competes with endogenous GAPDH. If the second riboprobe is designed, not to cut immediately after the insert but several bases further downstream, the additional vector sequence transcribed overlaps with, and is complementary to the first probe generated and thus will also hybridise (Fig. 1 ). The protected fragment (150 bases) from such a hybridisation satisfies the two main requirements: that it is larger than the endogenous protected fragment, thereby providing a distinct band for quantification (while also assaying and demonstrating variations in the endogenous GAPDH expression at the same time).


Figure 1 . The generation of an extended sense riboprobe using T7 RNA polymerase to act as an external control. This riboprobe, which has 30 bases more of the Bluescript vector sequence, hybridises to the antisense riboprobe in competition with endogenous GAPDH, resulting in a protected control fragment that is 30 bp longer than the endogenous fragment (Fig. 2).

This is illustrated in Figure 2 where a series of primary human carcinomas have been analysed for expression of a member of the wingless gene family ( wnt4 ). A subgroup of cases express the gene (upper band) and the spike control shows that every lane has run successfully with minimal differences (middle band). This also shows the spike control is smaller than either of the riboprobes, avoiding confusion as to whether the protected fragment is genuine rather than undigested riboprobe. There is considerable variation in the endogenous GAPDH expression. The spike control eliminates one further source of variation and would allow compensation for additonal losses in the protection assay.

Thus when preparing the hybridisation cocktail, two riboprobes are added-one antisense to detect endogenous gene expression, and one sense riboprobe at a much lower concentration (~1/20) to hybridise to the antisense probe, generating the larger external control. It is useful to use a radio-labelled sense riboprobe as this allows easy visualisation and quantification of this riboprobe prior to loading.


Figure 2 . A ribonuclease protection assay demonstrating the variability of the endogenous GAPDH signal in 28 human tumour samples compared with the constant level of the external control formed from the hybridisation of the GAPDH sense and antisense riboprobes. The upper arrow indicates the protected band for the wnt4 gene. The middle arrow demonstrates the spike GAPDH control showing uniformity of the protection assay. The lower arrow shows the endogenous GAPDH expression which varies between cancers. The two lanes marked with - had degraded ribosomal RNA.

As with the use of any external control, this method requires that the initial aliquots of each sample be equal, which can be confirmed by visualisation of 1 [mu]g of each sample on an agarose gel prior to use. However, the method presented here offers the advantage of being an easy means of controlling for losses independent of any gene expression within each sample. This is essential not just for assaying tumour samples where endogenous gene expression may vary, but also in regulation experiments where the effect of altering the conditions upon gene expression, including that of any control genes, is unknown.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

P.A.E.S. has been in receipt of grants from, and gratefully acknowledges the support of, the Rhodes Trust, the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, the Health Research Council of New Zealand, The Federation of University Women and the Nuffield Dominions Trust.

REFERENCES

1 Pimentel, J. L. J., Wang, S. and Martinez, M. M. (1994) Kidney Int., 45, 1614-1621.

2 Roach, T. I. A., Chatterjee, D. and Blackwell, J. M. (1994) Infect. Immun., 62, 1176-1184.

3 Watanabe, J., Hayashi, S. I. and Kawajiri, K. (1994) J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 116, 321-326.

4 Ihl, V. R., Marquetant, R., Bremerich, J. and Strasser, R. H. (1995) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 27, 437-452.

5 Kvanta, A. (1995) Curr. Eye Res., 14, 1015-1020. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Mansur, N. R., Meyer, S. K., Wurzer, J. C. and Sirover, M. A. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 993-998.

7 Meyer, S. K., Rahman, M. N., Wurzer, J. C. and Sirover, M. A. (1992) Carcinogenesis, 13, 2127-2132.

8 Graven, K. K., Troxler, R. F., Kornfeld, H., Panchenko, M. V. and Farber, H. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 24446-24453.

9 Desprez, P. Y., Poujol, D. and Saez, S. (1992) Cancer Lett., 64, 219-224.

10 Freyschuss, B., Sahlin, L., Masironi, B. and Eriksson, H. (1994) J. Endocrinol., 142, 285-298. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1865 222457; Fax: +44 1865 222431; Email: aharris.lab@icrf.icnet.uk
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M J Currie, V Hanrahan, S P Gunningham, H R Morrin, C Frampton, C Han, B A Robinson, and S B Fox
Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor D is associated with hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1{alpha}) and the HIF-1{alpha} target gene DEC1, but not lymph node metastasis in primary human breast carcinomas
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2004; 57(8): 829 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Rodins, M. Cheale, N. Coleman, and S. B. Fox
Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 2 Expression in Normal Kidney and Renal Cell Carcinomas: Relationship to Tumor Dormancy and Potential Clinical Utility
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1075 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Gunningham, M. J. Currie, C. Han, K. Turner, P. A. E. Scott, B. A. Robinson, A. L. Harris, and S. B. Fox
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-B and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression in Renal Cell Carcinomas: Regulation by the von Hippel-Lindau Gene and Hypoxia
Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 61(7): 3206 - 3211.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Gunningham, M. J. Currie, C. Han, B. A. Robinson, P. A. E. Scott, A. L. Harris, and S. B. Fox
The Short Form of the Alternatively Spliced flt-4 but not Its Ligand Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Is Related to Lymph Node Metastasis in Human Breast Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2000; 6(11): 4278 - 4286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (49K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?