Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (187K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aagaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aagaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 1523-1530

Footnote

Profile of the DNA recognition site of the archaeal homing endonuclease I-DmoI

Profile of the DNA recognition site of the archaeal homing endonuclease I- Dmo I Claus Aagaard+, Marianne J. Awayez and Roger A. Garrett*

Institute of Molecular Biology, Copenhagen University, Sølvgade 83 H, DK-1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Received January 22, 1997; Revised and Accepted March 5, 1997

ABSTRACT

I-DmoI is a homing enzyme of the LAGLI-DADG type that recognizes up to 20 bp of DNA and is encoded by an archaeal intron of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Desulfurococcus mobilis. A combined mutational and DNA footprinting approach was employed to investigate the specificity of the I-DmoI-substrate interaction. The results indicate that the enzyme binds primarily to short base paired regions that border the sites of DNA cleavage and intron insertion. The minimal substrate spans no more than 15 bp and while sequence degeneracy is tolerated in the DNA binding regions, the sequence and size of the cleavage region is highly conserved. The enzyme has a slow turnover rate and cuts the coding strand with a slight preference over the non-coding strand. Complex formation produces some distortion of the DNA double helix within the cleavage region. The data are compatible with the two DNA-binding domains of I-DmoI bridging the minor groove, where cleavage occurs, and interacting within the major groove on either side, thereby stabilizing a distorted DNA double helix. This may provide a general mode of DNA interaction at least for the LAGLIDADG-type homing enzymes.

INTRODUCTION

Homing-type enzymes have a wide phylogenetic distribution. They have been detected in group I introns of the nuclei and organelles of lower eukaryotes, in introns and inteins of the archaea, in proteobacterial phages (reviewed in 1 ) and, possibly, in cyanobacteria (2 ). These DNA endonucleases have been classified into groups on the basis of both the amino acid sequence motifs which they carry and their mechanism of DNA cleavage. The largest group, common to organelles of lower eukaryotes and archaea, contain two partially conserved LAGLIDADG boxes separated by ~100 amino acids. These homing enzymes bind to and cut sequence regions of double helical DNA, which are generally non-palindromic and extend over 15-25 bp, producing a 4 bp 3'-OH overhang (reviewed in 3 ). Their main function is to facilitate site-specific insertion, or homing, of the intron that encodes the endonuclease, into an intron-minus chromosome (4 ,5 ). Although this process inevitably requires a high level of DNA sequence specificity, a picture is emerging of some redundancy in the sequence being tolerated, at least for the homing enzymes I-CeuI from Chlamydomonas moewusii, I-SceII from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and I-PorI from Pyrobaculum organotrophum (6 -8 ).

In the present study, we have employed kinetic, mutational and footprinting approaches to investigate the DNA binding site of the homing enzyme I-DmoI (9 ) that is encoded by an intron within the single 23S rRNA gene of Desulfurococcus mobilis (10 ). This complements a parallel protein footprinting study of the DNA binding domains and metal chelating sites of I-DmoI (11 ,12 ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA cleavage assay

Aliquots of purified I-DmoI (a gift from J. Z. Dalgaard) (13 ) at 35 pmol/[mu]l were stored at -20oC in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 50% ethylene glycol, 1 mM DTT. The protein preparation was an equimolar mixture of the two forms of I-DmoI, expressed from linear and circular mRNAs, with sizes 22 and 22.6 kDa respectively, differing by five amino acids at the C-terminus (13 ). Their cleavage properties were indistinguishable (13 ) and it is unknown which form is expressed in vivo. The specific activity of the preparation was 1 U I-DmoI that corresponds to 1.75 pmol enzyme where 1 unit (U) is defined as the amount of enzyme required to digest 48.3 pmol of substrate to completion in 1 h at 65oC in 25 [mu]l of an assay buffer (13 ). The DNA substrate was generated from two complementary deoxyoligonucleotides with sequences 5'-GCCTTGCCGGGTAAGTTCCGGCGCG-3' and 5'-CGCGCCGGAACTTACCCGGCAAGGC-3' or a 400 bp PCR product amplified from the 23S rRNA gene of D.mucosus using the primers 5'-GGCACACCCCTGGGACCGC-3' and 5'-CCCTCCCACCTACTCTACGC-3'. Oligonucleo- tides were 5'-end-labelled using [[gamma]-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (both Amersham) and purified in 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. The two 25mer oligonucleotides were annealed at a ratio of 1:10 32P-end-labelled:unlabelled oligonucleotide in 10 [mu]l of 50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2 by heating at 85oC for 2 min and slowly cooling to room temperature. Substrates were cleaved at 65oC in 20 [mu]l cleavage buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100) and 1.5 [mu]g carrier DNA (pUC9). Reactions were stopped by adding 10 [mu]l formamide loading dye and cooling to 0oC. The substrate and cleavage products were separated in 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and quantified using an Instant Imager (Packard, USA).

Mutation, enrichment and cleavage of the DNA substrate

Single nucleotide mutants of the homing site were isolated by a single cleavage and PCR amplification step. A partially doped deoxyoligonucleotide 5'-CCTCTTAAGGTACCCAAATGCCTTGCCGGGTAAGTTCCGGCGCGCATGAATGGATCCACGCG-3' was synthesized where the underlined region was doped by 1.5%. The doping was performed by using a mixture of wild-type NTP (95.5%) and 1.5% of each of the other NTPs in each of the 25 rounds of synthesis. This produced substrate molecules where 32% carried wild-type sequences, 37% had a single mutation and 31% carried two or more mutations. The doped sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. It was hybridized to 500 pmol of 32P-5'-end-labelled oligonucleotide 5'-CGCGTGGATCCATTCATG-3' which was extended with 10 U T4 DNA polymerase in standard polymerase buffer and 25 mM of each dNTP at 30oC. The resulting double-stranded DNA was purified on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and 50 pmol were digested with 35 pmol I-DmoI for 20 min at 65oC. Substrate and cleavage products were separated in 10% polyacrylamide gels and undigested DNA was purified and amplified using the two oligonucleotide primers 5'-CCTCTTAAGGTACCCAAAT-3' and 5'-CGCGTGGATCCATTCATG-3'. The amplified DNA was digested with BamHI and KpnI (Amersham) and cloned into the M13mp19 vector digested with the same enzymes. Mutations were identified by sequencing the different clones using the universal M13 primer. Mutant substrates for I-DmoI cleavage assays were prepared as PCR fragments that were amplified from M13 clones using 20 pmol of both M13 universal and reverse primer. For each clone, two separate amplifications were performed with either the universal primer or the reverse primer being 5'-end-labelled.

A minimal 11 bp substrate was prepared by annealing 20 pmol of each of the deoxyoligonucleotides 5'-CGGGTAAGTTC-3' and 5'-GAACTTACCCG-3', as described above, and ligating the product into SmaI-digested pUC18. The ligation mixture was then amplified by PCR using 50 pmol of 32P-labelled universal sequencing primer 5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3' and unlabelled reverse sequencing primer 5'-AACAGCTATGACCATG-3'. The amplified DNA (109 bp) resulting from the insertion of the oligonucleotides was purified on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and digested with 35 or 3.5 pmol I-DmoI at 65oC for 20 min, or with 1 U HincII or SmaI (Amersham) for 1 h at 37oC.

DNA footprinting

Probing with DNase I was performed by incubating the I-DmoI-substrate complex in 50 [mu]l with 0.001 U DNase I (Boehringer) for 10 min at room temperature. The reaction was started by adding 1 [mu]l 0.5 M MgCl2 and stopped by adding 150 [mu]l of 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS and 1 [mu]g yeast tRNA. After precipitation, samples were lyophilized, suspended in formamide loading dye, and electrophoresed in 10% polyacrylamide sequencing gels containing 7 M urea and subjected to autoradiography.

End-labelled PCR fragments, with and without single site mutations, were complexed with I-DmoI and subjected to probing with dimethylsulphate (DMS). I-DmoI (0.1-3.5 pmol for the wild-type substrate and 3.5 pmol for the mutant substrates) was bound to 0.2 pmol substrate by heating at 65oC for 5 min in 50 [mu]l of 50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% glycerol and 0.1% Triton X-100. The DNA was methylated with 0.05% (vol/vol) DMS for 5 min at 65oC and the reaction was stopped by adding 150 [mu]l 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. After precipitation with ethanol, strand scission was induced at the methylated bases by heating at 90oC for 30 min in 1 M alkaline piperidine (Fisher, NJ). Samples were then suspended in formamide loading dye and electrophoresed as described above.

Competition binding experiments

An aliquot of 1 pmol end-labelled 25 bp substrate was mixed with 0, 1, 3 or 10 pmol non-labelled wild-type or mutant substrate generated by PCR amplification from the original M13 clones (see above) or with 0, 7, 21 or 70 ng pUC18 DNA and incubated with 1 pmol I-DmoI at 65oC for 5 min in 100 [mu]l standard cleavage buffer. The substrate and products were separated in 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and quantified using an Instant Imager (Packard, USA).

RESULTS

Activation of cleavage by divalent metal ions

An earlier study (13 ) indicated that although I-DmoI can bind to its DNA substrate in the absence of divalent metal ions, the presence of Mg2+ (or Mn2+) is required in order to activate the cleavage activity. We tested the influence of divalent metal ions more systematically employing a variety of divalent ions at a concentration of 1 mM. The results, which are summarized in Table 1 , demonstrate a broad metal ion specificity; strong cleavage was induced by Mn2+, Co2+ and Mg2+, weaker cleavage by Zn2+ and very weak cleavage by Ni2+. Since we had no insight into the preferred metal ion in vivo, Mg2+ was used in the subsequent studies.

Table 1 . Comparison of ionic radii and the relative degree of DNA cleavage for different divalent metal ions
Metal ion

Relative cleavagea

Effective radius r (pm)b

Mg2+

82 (+-8)

72

Cu2+

n.d.

96

Ni2+

10 (+-5)

70

Zn2+

54 (+-10)

74

Ca2+

n.d.

100

Mn2+

100

67 (82)c

Co2+

93 (+-2)

73 (65)c

Ba2+

n.d.

136

None

n.d.

-

aRelative cleavage was calculated as follows: 2.5 pmol wild-type substrate (25mer) in 100 [mu]l was incubated with 1 pmol I-DmoI for 5 min at 65oC with the individual metal ions present at a concentration of 1 mM. The ion inducing the highest level of I-DmoI cleavage was arbitrarily set to 100. Non-detectable cleavage (n.d.) corresponding to I-DmoI added with no divalent metal ion was set to 0. The amount of product formed with other ions was normalized within this range. Experiments were performed in triplicate and the results averaged.
bFor metal ions in octahedral coordination (14).

cTwo different radii are given for these metal ions (14).

Minimal substrate and cleavage of the coding strand


Figure 1. Cleavage of wild-type substrate. (A) Schematic representation of the I-DmoI recognition/cleavage site where the upper sequence corresponds to the coding strand. Oligonucleotides used as substrates were purified as described in Materials and Methods. The position of I-DmoI cleavage is marked by a line. The site of intron insertion is denoted by an arrowhead. Numbers above the sequence indicate the nucleotide positions relative to the intron insertion site. The shaded boxes denote the two palindromic sequences 5'-GCCGG-3'. (B) The cleavage rate of an oligonucleotide duplex is compared with that of a 300 bp PCR fragment using 10 pmol substrate and 4 pmol I-DmoI in 100 [mu]l cleavage buffer. The experiment was performed three times for each substrate and the range of observed yields of cleaved products at each time point are indicated by vertical bars. Cleavage of the coding strand (--) and the non-coding strand (.....) are indicated, separately. (C) Time course of cleavage at four concentrations of wild-type substrate. An aliquot of 0.12-6 pmol substrate was incubated in 120 [mu]l cleavage buffer with 1 pmol I-DmoI at 65oC. Samples where taken at increasing times and assayed for cleavage as described in Materials and Methods. The results are an average of three experiments and the upper and lower values found for each time point are indicated by a vertical bar. (D) A half-reciprocal plot of the initial cleavage rate of wild-type substrate (v0) versus substrate concentration (S) was plotted on the basis of the data in (C).

The minimal substrate site for I-DmoI is contained within a 22 bp sequence of D.mobilis 23S rDNA (13 ). Therefore, a substrate was produced from complementary oligonucleotides, 25 bp in length, extending from position -13 to +12 with respect to the intron insertion site (Fig. 1 A). Exceptionally for a homing site, it contains a 5 bp palindromic repeat sequence (Fig. 1 A). However, the palindrome is asymmetrical with respect to both the cleavage, and intron insertion sites, and is therefore unlikely to be significant for protein-DNA recognition; it produces a short double helical structure in the mature 23S rRNA (15 ).

The cleavage rate of the fragment was determined and compared with that of a 300 bp PCR fragment containing the intron homing sequence flanked by ~150 bp on each side. DNA fragments were 5'-end-labelled, separately, on each strand, and strand cleavage was monitored. After digestion with I-DmoI, samples were taken at regular intervals and the yields of the cleavage products were quantified. The cleavage characteristics of the 25 bp fragment and the 300 bp PCR fragment were indistinguishable, within the estimated error limits, on both strands (Fig. 1 B), thereby confirming that the 25 bp fragment constitutes a complete substrate. However, the cleavage rate of the coding strand was significantly higher than that of the non-coding strand (Fig. 1 B).


Figure 2. Cleavage of wild-type substrate at different enzyme and substrate concentrations. (A) The stability of I-DmoI was measured by pre-incubating 1.75 pmol enzyme alone in 100 [mu]l cleavage buffer for 0, 30, 90 and 240 min at 65oC. An aliquot of 1 pmol wild-type substrate was then added to each sample before reincubating at 65oC. Samples of 15 [mu]l were taken from 0 to 45 min, after addition of substrate, and the degree of cleavage was estimated. (B) 5'-end-labelled substrate (50 pmol) was incubated at 65oC in 100 [mu]l cleavage buffer in the presence of 35 or 3.5 pmol I-DmoI. Samples were taken after increasing incubation times and assayed for cleavage. (C) 5'-end- labelled substrate (5 pmol) was incubated at 65oC in 100 [mu]l cleavage buffer in the presence of 35, 3.5 or 0.35 pmol I-DmoI. Samples were taken after increasing incubation times and assayed for cleavage. Experiments in (B) and (C) were performed in triplicate and the range of values are indicated by vertical bars.

I-DmoI steady-state kinetics

The cleavage rate of the 25 bp substrate was measured at one enzyme concentration (1 pmol) and at four different substrate concentrations (Fig. 1 C). Cleavage reached completion except at the highest substrate concentration where there was a 6-fold molar excess of substrate. A half reciprocal plot of initial cleavage rates (v0) against initial substrate concentrations (S) (Fig. 1 D) yielded a kcat value of 0.5 min-1 and a Km value of 4 nM (+- 0.6), similar to a previous estimate of 4.8-5.6 obtained using a longer substrate and a different plotting procedure (13 ).

I-DmoI binds with two step kinetics

Some homing-type enzymes cleave their DNA substrates incompletely in vitro. This may reflect enzyme instability in the absence of substrate or, as was found for I-SceI, slow release of the DNA cleavage products (16 ). Therefore, the stability of I-DmoI was tested by incubating it alone in the cleavage buffer at 65oC. A strong decrease in cleavage activity was observed after incubating for 90 min with no residual activity after 4 h (Fig. 2 A). Given this relative instability, the cleavage activity of I-DmoI was investigated as a function of time at different enzyme concentrations.

The first experiment was performed using 50 pmol substrate (500 nM), ~125-fold higher than the Km for I-DmoI. Whereas 35 pmol I-DmoI produced 82-84% cleavage after 30 min, 3.5 pmol produced only 2% cleavage in the same time (Fig. 2 B). In the second experiment, 5 pmol substrate was cleaved ~90% by both 35 and 3.5 pmol I-DmoI after 30 min, while 0.35 pmol enzyme produced only 0.2% cleavage (Fig. 2 C).

These results are compatible with the following. (i) I-DmoI binds strongly to one of the products, as is found for I-SceI (16 ), and is unavailable for second cleavage round which would also explain why almost a 1:1 molar ratio of I-DmoI:substrate is required. (ii) Two copies of I-DmoI bind non-cooperatively per substrate molecule, since dimer binding at a 10-fold higher concentration of I-DmoI could enhance the binding probability by 100-fold. We favour the former explanation because there is no evidence for a symmetrical 2-fold symmetry within the DNA site (see Discussion).

Mutation-selection study of the DNA substrate

The nucleotide sequence specificity of the I-DmoI interaction was investigated by randomly mutating the 25 bp substrate and enriching for sequences that were deficient in cleavage by I-DmoI. An aliquot of 250 pmol of each substrate was derived from an oligonucleotide where the 25 nt (Fig. 1 A) were `doped' at a level of ~1.5% (see Material and Methods). I-DmoI (100 pmol) was incubated with this pool of substrates and the products were resolved on native gels. The band containing the uncleaved substrate was excised and the substrate was purified and cloned into M13mp19. Ninety-one clones were isolated from single colonies and sequenced. Of these, 22 exhibited the wild-type sequence while the remainder were mutated: 49 with single site mutations, 11 with double mutations and nine others contained deletions or insertions. The identities and frequency of occurrence of the single mutants are listed in Table 2 .

Given the relatively low level of selection in the first round (non-selection would theoretically give ~29 wild-type sequences), uncleaved substrates were cloned and sequenced after three rounds of selection (see Materials and Methods). After each selection and amplification round, 50-100 pmol substrate was digested with 70 pmol I-DmoI for 1 h at 65oC. Of 54 clones examined, most carried multiple mutations (three to eight) within the substrate sequence with at least one mutation within the central sequence adjacent to the intron homing site (see below). This indicated that many of the mutants selected for low, or non-cleavage, after one cycle were still cleavable in vitro, albeit at a much reduced rate.

This inference was tested directly by comparing the cleavage efficiencies of the 30 single-site mutants with that of the wild-type substrate. The results (Table 2 ) show that 19 were cleaved at >80% efficiency, four were cut in the 40-79% range, another four were cut in the 10-39% range; only three substrates A(-1)C, A(+1)T and G(+2)C showed very low, or no, cleavage (<10%). These data are superimposed on the DNA sequence in Figure 3 . They demonstrate that a limited sequence variation is tolerated within the DNA substrate, for both I-DmoI binding and cleavage, except around the site of cleavage and intron homing. Most mutations in this central region (-3 to +3) resulted in a strong reduction in cleavage, with transversions producing the larger effects; in contrast, relatively weak reductions in cleavage were observed for single mutations between positions -7 to -4 and -4 to +7. This also correlates with the observation (Table 2 ) that mutations producing the greatest reductions in cleavage were the most frequently isolated after selection.

Table 2 . Summary of the positions of the single site mutations, their frequency and effect on I-DmoI cleavage and binding
Position

Mutation

Number of

Cleavage

Competitive

Binding/

 

 

clones

efficiency

binding

cleavage

-13

G -> T

2

100 (+-12)

nd

 

-12

C -> T

2

100 (+-15)

nd

 

-10

T -> A

1

95 (+- 4)

nd

 

-9

T -> A

1

100 (+- 8)

nd

 

-9

T -> G

1

100 (+-14)

nd

 

-7

C -> A

1

72 (+- 8)

63

b/c

-7

C -> T

2

45 (+-17)

58

b/c

-6

C -> G

2

90 (+-10)

90

b/c

-4

G -> C

1

85 (+-15)

91

b/c

-3

G -> T

1

44 (+-15)

59

b/c

-2

T -> A

4

12 (+- 8)

86

c

-2

T -> C

1

100 (+-20)

100

 

-2

T -> G

1

30 (+-15)

91

c

-1

A -> C

5

2 (+- 2)

86

c

-1

A -> T

3

34 (+- 6)

95

c

1

A -> G

1

87 (+-14)

nd

 

1

A -> T

3

9 (+- 6)

94

c

2

G -> C

1

6 (+- 5)

97

c

3

T -> A

1

87 (+-20)

nd

 

3

T -> G

4

13 (+- 4)

86

 

4

T -> A

1

100 (+-15)

nd

 

4

T -> G

1

87 (+-15)

nd

 

5

C -> A

1

93 (+- 4)

97

b/c

5

C -> G

2

70 (+-10)

82

b/c

5

C -> T

1

100 (+-15)

nd

 

6

C -> G

1

100 (+-10)

nd

 

6

C -> T

1

93 (+-14)

nd

 

7

G -> T

1

100 (+-12)

nd

 

9

C -> A

1

100 (+- 7)

nd

 

12

G -> T

1

100 (+- 8)

nd

 

Relative efficiencies were calculated as follows: the amount of cleavage product formed on incubating 2.5 pmol wild-type substrate in 100 [mu]l with 1 pmol I-DmoI for 5 min at 65oC corresponds to 100. No detectable cleavage corresponds to 0. The amount of product formed on incubating mutant substrates, under similar conditions, was normalized within this range. Each experiment was performed at least three times and the range of values are indicated. The relative binding capacity of mutant substrates was estimated from competition experiments in which inhibition of cleavage of the wild-type substrate was measured (Fig. 6) and was calculated similarly. Error limits were estimated within +-10%. The inhibition of cleavage seen with 10-fold molar excess of non-labelled over labelled wild-type substrate (~16 ng DNA) was set to 100 and the inhibition produced by 16 ng pUC18 DNA corresponds to 0 (Fig. 6).
b: indicates that competitive binding of the DNA substrate for I-DmoI was decreased by the mutation.

c: indicates that cleavage was reduced by the mutation (see also Fig. 5).

Footprinting of I-DmoI on wild-type and mutant substrates

To investigate potential contacts between I-DmoI and the DNA substrate, the complex formed in the absence of Mg2+ was probed with DNase I and DMS. DNase I has no strong nucleoside specificity and is useful for determining the physical limits of the binding site. I-DmoI complexed with the wild-type substrate was treated with DNase I and the products were analysed in denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Strong protection was observed between positions -12 to +12 on the non-coding strand and from -10 to +12 on the coding strand (Fig. 4 D, lane 1 +- I-DmoI) suggesting that most of the 25 bp fragment was required for binding.


Figure 3.Summary of the cleavage data for all the different single-site mutants listed in Table 2 superimposed on the DNA substrate (coding strand) sequence. The relative degree of cleavage is denoted by the following symbols: filled oval circles, no cleavage; stippled oval circles, weak cleavage; open oval circles, strong cleavage; open diamonds, normal cleavage. The endonuclease cleavage sites and the position of intron insertion are indicated (see also Fig. 1A).


Figure 4. DNase I and DMS footprinting of wild-type and single-site mutant substrates. Positions given on the left side of each panel denote nucleotide positions measured relative to the intron insertion site (Fig. 1A). Protected regions are enclosed by brackets. (A) DMS probing of the wild-type substrate by incubating with increasing amounts of I-DmoI and probing on the coding strand (Fig. 1A): lanes 1-4, 0.2 pmol DNA fragment was incubated at 65oC for 5 min with 0.0, 0.1, 0.7 or 3.5 pmol I-DmoI prior to adding 0.05% DMS and incubating at 65oC for a further 5 min. (B) As in (A) but probing the non-coding strand (Fig. 1A). (C) Comparative probing of the coding strands of mutant substrates with DMS where 0.2 pmol substrate was treated in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 3.5 pmol I-DmoI. Lane 1: wild-type substrate; lane 2: C(-6)G; lane 3: A(+1)T; lanes 4-6: deletions at positions -3, +1 and +4 respectively. (D) DNase I footprinting on the coding strand. 0.2 pmol substrate was treated in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 3.5 pmol I-DmoI with 0.001 U DNase I for 10 min at room temperature after adjusting to 10 mM Mg2+. Samples are loaded and enumerated as in (C). A/G, Maxam-Gilbert DNA sequencing reaction. (E) Summary of DMS footprinting data superimposed on a two dimensional projection of the DNA substrate where the coding strand of the DNA is indicated in bold letters. The major groove is denoted by M and the minor groove by m. Base pairs within the major grooves adjoining the cleavage sites (indicated by bold arrows) are presented by broken lines. *, guanines protected against DMS modification by I-DmoI; s, enhanced adenine reactivity on binding I-DmoI; [Delta], DMS reactive guanines not protected by I-DmoI.

DMS-probing primarily detects changes in guanine reactivities (N-7 position) in the major groove. Substrates cloned into M13mp19 were amplified by PCR, using M13 universal and reverse primers, one of which was end-labelled. The wild-type substrate was complexed with different molar ratios of I-DmoI and probed. The results revealed a region containing protected guanines extending from positions -8 to +7 on the coding strand and from positions -6 to +9 on the non-coding strand (Fig. 4 A and B); both are minimal estimates of the protected region since the sequences are not bordered by guanine residues; maximum estimates would be -6 to +10 and -12 to +7, respectively (Fig. 4 E). Within these protected regions, only the reactivity of G(-3), on the coding strand, remained unaffected (Fig. 4 A). Exceptionally, A(+4) on the non-coding strand became reactive, compatible with I-DmoI inducing a local opening of the DNA structure to expose the N-1 position of this adenine (Fig. 4 B). Symmetrical reactivity patterns were observed for guanine residues bordering the cleavage site when I-DmoI was bound (Fig. 4 E).

Several I-DmoI complexes carrying single site mutations in their substrates were also probed by DMS. They all yielded footprints similar to that of the wild-type substrate (e.g. lanes 2 and 3 in Fig. 4 C and D). Moreover, mutant substrates where guanines were introduced showed additional protection by I-DmoI at positions +1 and +3 (on the coding strand; Table 2 ). The footprinting was only performed at one molar ratio of I-DmoI:DNA for the mutant substrates and, therefore, binding constants were not estimated. For three single-site mutants A(-1)C, A(+1)T and G(+2)C, strong footprints were observed despite cleavage efficiencies that were <10% that of the wild-type substrate. This contrasts with the results observed for I-PorI (8 ) where strong binding was observed to all cleavable substrates no matter how poorly they were cleaved. This result reinforces that the DNA binding and cleavage domains of I-DmoI are independent of one another.

Differentiating DNA binding and cleavage domains

The data are compatible with a model in which the central region of the DNA substrate is primarily involved in cleavage given (i) the limited I-DmoI protection effects observed in this region and (ii) the more dramatic effects that mutations in this region have on cleavage (Fig. 4 E). The data correlate further with the flanking sequences being primarily involved in I-DmoI binding (Table 2 ).

This model was tested further by examining I-DmoI binding and cleavage of substrates carrying single site deletions or insertions (Figs 4 C and D and 5 ). The footprinting data obtained by DMS probing indicated that little or no binding occurred to the substrates with deletions at positions -3, -1 or +1 and +3 or +4. This is consistent with the observation that the former was cleaved weakly (Fig. 4 C and D; lanes 4, 5 and 6) while the latter two were not cleaved (Fig. 5 ); similar results were found for a single base pair insertion between positions -6 and -3 (Fig. 5 ). Therefore, the results strongly suggest that changes in the spacing of this region prevent I-DmoI binding which could reflect either that changes in the distance between the two DNA attachment sites that flank this region are not tolerated or that the flexibility of the central region is diminished.


Figure 5. Analysis of I-DmoI binding and cleavage of mutant substrates carrying single deletions or insertions. Data are presented for three substrates with single-site deletions and three with single-site insertions. Deletions are denoted by a space in the sequence while insertions are indicated by lower case letters. DMS probing data are summarized for complexes of five substrates with I-DmoI using the symbols defined in the legend to Figure 4E. *, weak protection by I-DmoI. Incubation conditions, relative cleavage efficiencies and I-DmoI binding capacities were defined in the legend to Table 2.

Finally, we investigated the extent to which loss of cleavage activity of the mutant substrates correlated with their capacity to bind I-DmoI by competitive binding experiments. Fixed amounts of end-labelled wild-type substrate were incubated with increasing concentrations of an unlabelled competitor DNA that consisted of the wild-type substrate, selected mutant substrates, intron-exon junctions, or an unspecific control DNA sample (pUC18) containing no detectable recognition sequence for I-DmoI. Representative inhibition curves are illustrated (Fig. 6 A and B) and the results for all the tested mutant substrates are presented in Table 2 .


Figure 6. Cleavage competition experiments for I-DmoI mixed with different substrates. End-labelled wild-type substrate (1 pmol) was incubated for 5 min at 65oC with 1 pmol I-DmoI and increasing amounts of unlabelled competitor generated by PCR. (A) Substrates were amplified from the original M13 clones that had been subjected to DNA sequencing. (B) Ex1-Int-Ex2 (~1 kb) was amplified from the 23S rDNA of D.mobilis and contains the intron and ~150 bp of both upstream and downstream exons. Ex1-Int (0.45 kb) was amplified from the same gene and contains the upstream exon and part of the intron. The relative cleavage inhibition, due to non-specific binding of I-DmoI was subtracted for each substrate (except for pUC18) by subtracting the binding to the same quantity (weight) of pUC18 DNA.

For several substrates, the degree of cleavage correlated directly with the capacity to bind competitively with wild-type substrate. They included substrates carrying mutations at positions -7, -6, -3 and +5 (Table 2 ). In contrast, several other substrates were cleaved weakly but bound competitively. They are all localized at the centre of the substrate at positions -2, -1, +1, +2 and +3 (Table 2 ) and we infer, therefore, that these positions are not crucial for binding but are important for cleavage. Deletion of the T-A pair, at position +3/+4, produced very weak binding which correlated both with the lack of a footprint and with the absence of cleavage (Fig. 4 A and D, sample 6; Fig. 5 ). A group of three mutant substrates showed weak competition. For the insertion mutant, between positions -4 and -3, this correlated with poor cleavage (30%). The two uncleaved substrates consisting of part of the upstream exon-intron junction and the whole intron flanked by large exon sequences (1000 bp) showed competition with the wild-type substrate suggesting some affinity of I-DmoI at least for the upstream junction.

A minimal recognition-cleavage site

The above results imply that the minimal substrate for I-DmoI is 11-12 bp (Fig. 4 E). To test this, the two strands of an 11mer, extending from positions -6 to +5 on the coding strand, were synthesized and annealed. No cleavage was observed by I-DmoI, at 15 mM Mg2+, over a temperature range from 25 to 50oC. However, when the 11mer was cloned into the SmaI site of pUC18 and amplified using PCR, generating a substrate corresponding to a 15mer with 1 bp change (position +6) that does not impair cleavage (Fig. 3 ) and with ~50 bp flanking the 15 bp core on both sides, complete cleavage of 10 pmol substrate was observed with both 35 and 3.5 pmol I-DmoI after 20 min incubation at 65oC (Fig. 7 ).


Figure 7.(A) Sequence of the I-DmoI homing site (above) and two orientations for the 11mer cloned into the SmaI site of pUC18 (below) both of which were present. Only 25 bp of a total of 109 bp are shown since the remaining sequence is known to be unimportant for cleavage (Fig. 1B). -, the limits of the 11mer. The I-DmoI cleavage site is marked by a line and the intron insertion site is depicted by an arrow. Shaded boxes indicate the 14 bp sequence that is common to the 25mer substrate and the cloned 11mer substrate. (B) Digestion of a mixture of clones of the 11-mer (~10 pmol). Lane 1, no enzyme added; lane 2, 35 pmol I-DmoI; lane 3, 3.5 pmol I-DmoI; lanes 4 and 5, control digests with 1 U HincII and SmaI respectively.

DISCUSSION

A combined chemical and mutational analysis was performed in vitro to investigate I-DmoI-substrate interactions. The data obtained are compatible with the central region of the DNA substrate, that requires a conserved sequence and length, being primarily involved in cleavage and intron insertion, while the flanking regions contain the main DNA attachment sites. Although the I-DmoI substrate contains a palindromic sequence, that is a prerequisite for the formation of an essential helix in 23S rRNA (7 ), it is non-symmetrical with respect to the I-DmoI cleavage sites. Thus, it is unlikely that I-DmoI binds to its substrate as a dimer. This inference is supported both by the failure to detect I-DmoI dimers in solution (13 ) and by the results of a parallel protein footprinting study on I-DmoI where two separate DNA binding domains were identified, within the monomer protein, separated by ~100 amino acids (11 ).

The low turnover rate of I-DmoI (0.5 min-1) correlates with that observed earlier for another archaeal homing enzyme I-PorI (8 ) and may reflect that hyperthermophile genomes carry only one cleavage site (5 ) such that there is no need for rapid turnover. Moreover, I-DmoI may remain bound to one of the cleavage products (Fig. 1 A) as found for I-SceI and PI-SceI (16 ,17 ); this could explain the observed competitive binding of the upstream exon-intron fragment (Fig. 6 B).

All DNA endonucleases require divalent metal ions to cleave their DNA substrates although the binding specificity for the ions is generally low (12 ,18 ). I-DmoI was activated in the order Mn2+ > Co2+ > Mg2+ > Zn2+ > Ni2+ at 1 mM concentration whereas Cu2+, Ca2+ and Ba2+ did not support cleavage. From Table 1 it seems that an ionic radius of ~70 pm is needed for catalysis. A possible explanation is that the metal ion has to fit into a relatively small pocket that excludes larger metal ions. This is unlikely, however, since a parallel protein footprinting study with I-PorI and I-DmoI (12 ) showed that Ca2+ inhibited endonucleolytic cleavage of the DNA substrates. Another explanation may be that the larger metal ions can enter the catalytic pocket but are coordinated differently from the smaller metal ions and therefore do not support cleavage.

A comparison of the results from the mutation-cleavage study of the I-DmoI-substrate complex with those of other homing-type enzyme-substrate complexes did not reveal any general correlation between the location of the mutated site and the degree of cleavage inhibition, although both the PI-SceI enzyme and HO endonuclease appear to share a central region where mutations strongly inhibit cleavage (17 ,19 ). Apparently, different homing enzymes exhibit differing levels of sequence specificity. Whereas I-DmoI is less discriminating during binding but more so in the cleavage region, others, including I-PorI, discriminate strongly during binding where a single mutation in the flanking region prevents binding, and therefore cleavage, whereas the sequence within the central cleavage region is less critical (8 ). A third group that includes I-CeuI and I-SceII (6 ,7 ) appears to discriminate at relatively low levels for binding and cleavage while a fourth group, that includes PI-SceI and I-SceI, discriminates fairly strongly for both functions (17 ,20 ). Thus, the occurrence of at least two levels of discrimination, and possibly a third (see below), could explain why these homing enzymes cut so rarely.

The footprinting data (Fig. 4 ) are comparable with those reported earlier for the eukaryotic endonucleases I-PpoI and PI-SceI that cleave DNA by a similar mechanism to produce a 3'-OH 4 bp overhang, although only the latter carries the LAGLIDADG motifs (21 ,22 ). The former, I-PpoI, is also exceptional in that it binds as a dimer to an imperfect palindrome that is symmetrical with respect to the cleavage sites (23 ). I-DmoI and I-PpoI produce similar protection patterns when probed with DMS and they both produce the same hypersensitive site at A(+4) on the non-coding strand (23 ). PI-SceI-DNA complexes have not been probed with DMS but hydroxyl radical probing produced similar protection patterns on either side of, but not within, the cleavage region (24 ); these data were also reinforced by damage-selection experiments using methylation and ethylation reactions (17 ). The similarities correlate with the mutation cleavage results, described above, and suggest that, despite their different levels of sequence specificity, homing enzymes may have a common mechanism for interacting with the DNA double helix.

For I-DmoI, each of the two domains within the monomer protein (11 ) appear to interact with regions of the DNA substrate that border the cleavage region (Fig. 4 E). This suggests a working model for cleavage by homing enzymes where one domain binds first in the major groove where it recognizes a sequence flanking the cleavage site. PI-SceI has been shown to bind initially to the downstream recognition region (17 ) while I-PorI may have a preference for the upstream region (8 ); in contrast, I-DmoI and I-PpoI (23 ) seem to have no strong preference. Subsequently, the enzyme binds in the major groove containing the other flanking sequence, after inducing a distortion of the intervening DNA helix. The protein crosses the intervening minor groove of the DNA, where cleavage of the backbone takes place, to produce 3'-OH 4 bp overhangs (Fig. 4 E). The binding energy deriving from base- and backbone-specific interactions probably stabilizes an energetically unfavourable DNA conformer which places the phosphodiester bonds to be hydrolysed in the active site of the endonuclease. Bending of the cleavage domain of the DNA (Fig. 4 E) would probably involve some degree of unwinding of the double helix that increases the accessibility of the N-1 position of A(+4) on the non-coding strand of the I-DmoI- and I-PpoI-substrate complexes. In support of such a model, both I-PpoI and PI-SceI have been shown to bend their substrates (17 ,25 ). The bending and distortion would also provide a rationale for how the relatively small endonucleases (~20-25 kDa) recognize a DNA site corresponding to 1.5-2 double helical turns. Furthermore, the ease with which the DNA sequence adopts the appropriate conformation for cleavage may provide an additional level of discrimination for the homing enzyme-substrate interaction.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The research was supported by grants from the Danish Natural Science Research Council and the Danish Biotechnology II Program. J. Lykke-Andersen is thanked for critically reading the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1 Belfort,M., Reaban,M.E., Coetzee,T. and Dalgaard,J.Z. (1995) J. Bacteriol., 177, 3897-3903. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Biniszkiewicz,D., Cesnaviciene,E. and Shub,D.A. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 4629-4635. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Lambowitz,A.M. and Belfort,M. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 62, 587-622.

4 Dujon,B. (1980) Cell, 20, 185-197. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Aagaard,C., Dalgaard,J.Z. and Garrett R.A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA,92, 12285-12289. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Marshall,P. and Lemieux,C. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 6401-6407. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Wernette,C., Saldanha,R., Smith,D., Ming,D., Perlman,P.S. and Butow, R.A. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 716-723. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Lykke-Andersen,J., Thi-Ngoc,H.P. and Garrett, R.A. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4583-4590. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Dalgaard,J.Z., Garrett,R.A. and Belfort,M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 5414-5417.

10 Kjems,J. and Garrett, R.A. (1985) Nature, 318, 675-677.

11 Lykke-Andersen,J., Garrett, R.A. and Kjems,J. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 1512-1517.

12 Lykke-Andersen,J., Garrett,R.A. and Kjems,J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, in press.

13 Dalgaard,J.Z., Garrett,R.A. and Belfort,M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 28885-28892.

14 Shannon, J. and Prewitt, R. (1969) Acta Crystallogr. B 25, 925-926.

15 Leffers,H., Kjems,J., Ostergaard,L., Larsen,N. and Garrett R.A. (1987) J. Mol. Biol., 195, 43-61. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Perrin,A., Buckle,M. and Dujon,B. (1993) EMBO J., 12, 2939-2947. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Gimble,F. and Wang,J. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 263, 163-180. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Vipond,I.B., Baldwin,G.S. and Halford,S.E. (1995) Biochemistry, 34, 697-704.

19 Nickoloff,J.A., Singer,J.D. and Heffron,F. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1174-1179.

20 Colleaux,L., D'Auriol,L., Galibert,F. and Dujon,B. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 6022-6026. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Muscarella,D.E., Ellison,E.L, Ruoff, B.M. and Vogt,V.M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 3386-3396.

22 Gimble,F.S. and Thorner,J. (1992) Nature, 357, 301-306.

23 Ellison,E.L. and Vogt,V.M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7531-7539.

24 Gimble,F.S. and Stephens,B.W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem.,270, 5849-5856.

25 Wittmayer,P.K. and Raines,R.T. (1996) Biochemistry, 35, 1076-1083.


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +45 35 32 20 10; Fax +45 35 32 20 40; Email: garrett@mermaid.molbio.ku.dk

+Present address: Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0518, USA
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Jarjour, H. West-Foyle, M. T. Certo, C. G. Hubert, L. Doyle, M. M. Getz, B. L. Stoddard, and A. M. Scharenberg
High-resolution profiling of homing endonuclease binding and catalytic specificity using yeast surface display
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2009; 37(20): 6871 - 6880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Y. Yung, C. Burke, M. Lewis, S. Egan, S. Kjelleberg, and T. Thomas
Phylogenetic screening of a bacterial, metagenomic library using homing endonuclease restriction and marker insertion
Nucleic Acids Res., September 18, 2009; (2009) gkp746v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. McConnell Smith, R. Takeuchi, S. Pellenz, L. Davis, N. Maizels, R. J. Monnat Jr, and B. L. Stoddard
Generation of a nicking enzyme that stimulates site-specific gene conversion from the I-AniI LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5099 - 5104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. Takeuchi, M. Certo, M. G. Caprara, A. M. Scharenberg, and B. L. Stoddard
Optimization of in vivo activity of a bifunctional homing endonuclease and maturase reverses evolutionary degradation
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2009; 37(3): 877 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. J. Marcaida, J. Prieto, P. Redondo, A. D. Nadra, A. Alibes, L. Serrano, S. Grizot, P. Duchateau, F. Paques, F. J. Blanco, et al.
Crystal structure of I-DmoI in complex with its target DNA provides new insights into meganuclease engineering
PNAS, November 4, 2008; 105(44): 16888 - 16893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Prieto, J.-C. Epinat, P. Redondo, E. Ramos, D. Padro, F. Cedrone, G. Montoya, F. Paques, and F. J. Blanco
Generation and Analysis of Mesophilic Variants of the Thermostable Archaeal I-DmoI Homing Endonuclease
J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4364 - 4374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. H. Silva and M. Belfort
Analysis of the LAGLIDADG interface of the monomeric homing endonuclease I-DmoI
Nucleic Acids Res., June 9, 2004; 32(10): 3156 - 3168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. S. Gimble
Degeneration of a homing endonuclease and its target sequence in a wild yeast strain
Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2001; 29(20): 4215 - 4223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Lucas, C. Otis, J.-P. Mercier, M. Turmel, and C. Lemieux
Rapid evolution of the DNA-binding site in LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2001; 29(4): 960 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Lin and V. M. Vogt
Functional {alpha}-fragment of {beta}-galactosidase can be expressed from the mobile group I intron PpLSU3 embedded in yeast pre-ribosomal RNA derived from the chromosomal rDNA locus
Nucleic Acids Res., March 15, 2000; 28(6): 1428 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Pingoud, H. Thole, F. Christ, W. Grindl, W. Wende, and A. Pingoud
Photocross-linking of the Homing Endonuclease PI-SceI to Its Recognition Sequence
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 1999; 274(15): 10235 - 10243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (187K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aagaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aagaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?