Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (169K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press 1633-1640

Footnote

An immunoaffinity purified Schizosaccharomyces pombe TBP-containing complex directs correct initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter

An immunoaffinity purified Schizosaccharomyces pombe TBP-containing complex directs correct initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter Ling Chen+, Ailan Guo and Louise Pape*

Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA

Received October 11, 1996; Revised and Accepted February 10, 1997

ABSTRACT

The multi-protein complex SL1, containing TBP, which is essential for RNA polymerase I catalyzed transcription, has been analyzed in fission yeast. It was immunopurified based on association of component subunits with epitope-tagged TBP. To enable this analysis, a strain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe was created where the only functional TBP coding sequences were those of FLAG-TBP. RNA polymerase I transcription components were fractionated from this strain and the TBP-associated polypeptides were subsequently immunopurified together with the epitope- tagged TBP. An assessment of the activity of this candidate SL1 complex was undertaken cross-species. This fission yeast TBP-containing complex displays two activities in redirecting transcriptional initiation of an S.pombe rDNA gene promoter cross-species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription reactions: it both blocks an incorrect transcriptional start site at +7 and directs initiation at the correct site for S.pombe rRNA synthesis. This complex is essential for accurate initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene: rRNA synthesis is reconstituted when this S.pombe TBP-containing complex is combined with a S.pombe fraction immunodepleted of TBP.

INTRODUCTION

Activation of transcription of eukaryotic rRNA genes entails recognition of the promoter by an essential initiation factor, termed SL1 (1 ,2 ) or, alternatively, TIF-IB (3 -5 ), factor D (6 ,7 ) or Rib1 (8 ). This factor is critical in directing association of the catalytic enzyme, RNA polymerase I, with an SL1-rDNA gene promoter complex for initiation of the pre-~37-45S rRNA (9 ,10 ). In addition, SL1 confers species specificity to transcriptional initiation of eukaryotic rRNA genes, as is evident when even closely related species do not have the capability of directing correct transcriptional initiation of the other species' rRNA genes (reviewed in 7 ). The subunit structure of the SL1/TIF-IB factor has been determined in human and mouse and consists of TBP and three TBP-associated factors (TAFIs): TAFI110 (human), TAFI95 (mouse) and TAFI63 and TAFI48 (human and mouse; 1 ,11 ). However, it is not known whether an SL1 complex consisting of TBP and associated subunits is universal in eukaryotes and, if so, whether the subunit composition and mechanism of interaction with species-specific rDNA promoters varies (see for example 12 ). The first report of a multi-subunit complex required for rRNA synthesis in the yeast S.cerevisiae indicated that TBP was not a stably associated subunit (13 ).

TBP plays a central role in transcription catalyzed by all three nuclear RNA polymerases (14 -16 ), yet forms specific multi- subunit complexes that differ for each of the three polymerases (reviewed in 16 ). The polymerase II complex, TFIID, bears seven or more TBP-associated factors (TAFIIs; 17 -19 ), while the polymerase III complex, TFIIIB, bears two (20 -23 ). While the mouse and human SL1/TF-IB factors each contain TBP and three TAFIs, evidence suggests that the Acanthamoeba polymerase I essential initiation factor, TIF-IB, consists of TBP and four associated polypeptides (13 ). The candidates for SL1 subunits in bakers yeast, including Rrn6p, Rrn7p and a 66 kDa polypeptide, co-purified in a complex which did not contain TBP (13 ), although TBP was shown to fractionate with the initiation factor in early stages of purification (24 ). However, recent analyses revealed that TBP did associate with this polymerase I `core factor' complex and that Rrn11p was the 66 kDa polypeptide (25 ,26 ).

An exploration of the composition and activity of the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis was undertaken in fission yeast. To this end, the S.pombe tbp + gene (27 ,28 ) was disrupted and a strain of S.pombe created whose sole functional TBP was an epitope-tagged version. A complex was immunopurified that displayed SL1-like activity: it directed correct initiation of the S.pombe rRNA minigene cross-species in S.cerevisiae and repressed incorrect initiation. Reconstitution of S.pombe rRNA synthesis using homologous S.pombe factors was dependent on this complex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Disruption of the S.pombetbp+ coding sequences

A clone containing the genomic tbp+ gene (with an ~10 kb genomic insert in pDB248; kindly provided by Dr Alexander Hoffmann; 27 ) was partially digested with XbaI and a 2.6 kb fragment was gel isolated and subcloned into the pBS SK+ XbaI site (corresponding to positions 12 376-14 991; DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession no. Z66525). Following partial digestion of the resultant plasmid, p2.6tbp+, with HindIII, a 5.4 kb fragment was gel isolated which lacked 162 bp between the two HindIII sites of tbp+ (see Fig. 1 A). This was ligated to a 1.8 kb HindIII fragment containing the wild-type S.pombe ura4+ coding sequences, which was isolated from pREP2 (29 ,30 ). The resultant plasmid, p[Delta]tbp::ura4, bearing the disrupted tbp gene, was linearized with XbaI and the insert was transformed into S.pombe as described below.


Figure 1. (A) Construction of a disrupted S.pombe tbp+ gene. The p2.6tbp+ plasmid DNA contains an ~2.6 kb partial XbaI fragment inserted into pBS SK+ (see positions 12 357-14 991 of S.pombe genomic sequence, accession no. Z66525). The three exons of tbp+ are shown as stipled boxes. To create the disrupted copy of tbp+ coding sequences, a partial HindIII digest of p2.6tbp+ released a 162 bp fragment coding for the essential C-terminal 14 amino acids of tbp+ and a 3'-untranslated region. A 1.8 kb HindIII fragment bearing ura4+ was inserted into this HindIII site, creating p[Delta]tbp::ura4. A diagram of the disrupted tbp+ gene is shown below, with the 1.8 kb ura4+ coding sequences crosshatched. (B) Southern analysis of the S.pombe strain bearing a disrupted tbp allele. Genomic DNA was isolated from the parental diploid strain SP826 (lanes 2 and 4) and from diploid Ura+ transformants (a representative is shown in lanes 1 and 3) and digested with EcoRI and HindIII (lane 1 and 2) or EcoRI (lanes 3 and 4). The 7.2 kb EcoRI fragment bears the wild-type allele of tbp+ and the 8.8 kb EcoRI fragment harbors the disrupted tbp allele ([Delta]tbp::ura4). The Southern blot was hybridized with an ~1 kb XbaI probe derived from the 5' two thirds of the tbp+ genomic DNA (see A).

Replacement of the chromosomal S.pombetbp+gene with a disrupted version via homologous recombination

A 3.3 kb XbaI fragment containing [Delta]tbp::ura4 sequences was gel isolated from p[Delta]tbp::ura4 (see Fig. 1 A) and 1 [mu]g was used to transform S.pombe SP826 (h+/h+ leu l-32//leu1-32 ura-4- D18/ura4-18 ade6-216/ade6-210; kindly sent by Dr Dave Frendewey). Ura+ transformants were selected (30 ) and Southern analysis was performed to assess whether a chromosomal allele of tbp+ was disrupted in the Ura+ transformants. Genomic DNA was extracted from 10 ml culture using the glass beads method as described (31 ). One fifth of the extracted nucleic acids from individual S.pombe Ura+ transformants was subjected to Southern analysis (31 ). Following fractionation on a 1% agarose-1* TBE gel and transfer to nitrocellulose, the DNA was cross-linked to the membrane using a GN Gene linker (BioRad) and hybridized in 50% formamide, 6* SSC, 0.1% SDS, 5* Denhardt's reagent, 50 mM Na3PO4, pH 6.5, 50 [mu]g/ml single-stranded calf thymus DNA and ~106 c.p.m. genomic tbp+ probe at 42oC overnight. As seen in Figure 1 B, an ~7.2 kb EcoRI fragment contains the TBP coding sequences in the parental diploid strain (lane 4), while one-step gene disruption of this diploid results in production of an ~8.8 kb EcoRI fragment containing tbp sequences (lane 3), due to the ura4+ coding sequences present in the disrupted copy, in addition to the 7.2 kb EcoRI fragment. Digestion of the genomic DNAs with EcoRI and HindIII liberates the same sized genomic fragment from both the parental and the diploid strains carrying the disrupted tbp allele, ~1.4 kb in size, as expected (Fig. 1 B, lanes 1 and 2).

Radioactive labeling of the probe by random priming

Aliquots of 100 ng 1 kb XbaI fragment containing the 5' two-thirds of the S.pombe tbp+ gene (see Fig. 1 A) were labeled by the random priming method in the presence of dA,G and TTPs and 40 [mu]Ci [[alpha]32P]dCTP (NEN; >3000 Ci/mmol) (31 ). Random hexamers were obtained from Pharmacia.

Construction of an S.pombe/Escherichia coli shuttle vector bearing S.pombe FLAG-TBP

The S.pombe tbp+ cDNA sequences were amplified utilizing a primer designed to insert coding sequences for the eight amino acid FLAGtm epitope tag (Kodak/IBI) following the initiating methionine at the N-terminus of tbp+. This position was shown to be neutral for insertion of an epitope tag in the human TBP coding sequences (33 ). To this end, the S.pombe TBP coding sequences [from the TFIID cDNA clone (27 ), kindly sent by Drs Alexander Hoffman and M.Horikoshi] were amplified using as forward primer 5'-GCCATATGGATTACAAAGACGATGACGACAAGGATTTCGCTTTACC, encoding MDYKDDDDKDFAL, and a vector-specific reverse primer. The FLAGtm tag consists of the eight amino acids DYKDDDDK (Kodak/IBI). The PCR products were treated with T4 DNA polymerase to convert the ends to blunt ends and ligated to SalI linkers. Following digestion with SalI and preparative isolation of the fragment, it was subsequently ligated into the SalI site of pBluescript SK+. Due to frequent deletions of the TBP coding sequence, this procedure and screening of E.coli Ampr transformants had to be repeated multiple times until a correct, full-length clone was isolated, pFLAG-S.p.TBP. The FLAG-TBP insert was released by digestion with NdeI and BamHI and ligated into the NdeI and BamHI sites of the S.pombe/E.coli shuttle vector pRep1 (29 ; kindly sent by Dr Kinsey Maundrell), creating pRep1/FLAG-S.p.TBP.

Introduction of a tagged version of tbp+ cDNA into the [Delta]tbp::ura4/tbp+ diploid strain of S.pombe

PlasmidpRep1/FLAG-S.p.TBP was introduced into a diploid S.pombe strain bearing a disrupted tbp+ allele (tbp/[Delta]tbp::ura4) and Leu+ transformants were selected. Following sporulation and selective killing of non-sporulating diploid cells, Leu+, Ura+, Ade- haploids were isolated. This procedure (suggested by Dr Henry Levin, NIH) involved treating ~1 ml diploid cells (~107 cells/ml) overnight with 20 [mu]l 1:10-fold dilution of glusulase; removing the glusulase and incubating the cells for 30 min in 30% ethanol before plating onto solid medium lacking leucine and uracil. Southern analysis revealed that these haploids contained the disrupted [Delta]tbp::ura4 chromosomal allele and the extrachromosomal FLAG-TBP coding sequences (data not shown). The resultant strain is Sp[Delta]TBP (h+ leu l-32 ura-4-D18 ade6-[Delta]tbp::ura4 pRep1/FLAG-S.p.TBP). The extrachromosomal plasmid pRep1/FLAG-S.p.TBP did not segregate during growth in rich medium, as expected, since it carried the only viable TBP coding sequences.

Preparation of S-100 extract and ammonium sulfate precipitation

Sp[Delta]TBP was grown in thiamine-deficient EMM medium, to ensure maximal expression of FLAG-TBP (30 ), with constant vigorous shaking at 30oC and cells were collected while in mid logarithmic growth phase. S-100 was prepared from 40 l cells as described (32 ). Aliquots of 195 mg S-100 (total protein concentration; S-100 was made from 50 g pelleted and frozen cells) were adjusted to ammonium sulfate 60% saturation, centrifuged (15 000 g, 4oC, 15 min) and suspended in TA buffer (20 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.5) as described (25 ). Following 4 h dialysis, the solution was diluted to 20-30 mg/ml and centrifuged at 10 000 g (25 ). The pellet was suspended in 0.2 ml buffer [20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 0.05 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 20% glycerol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)]. The suspended pellet (35 mg/ml) and the supernatant (1.5 ml with a protein concentration of 59 mg/ml) were stored at -75oC.

HiTrap-Q column elution of low salt supernatant of ammonium sulfate fractionation

A sample of 31 mg protein (the supernatant following the second centrifugation, above) was adjusted to 1* loading buffer [25 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol (v/v), 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT], 0.1 M KCl and loaded onto a 5 ml Pharmacia HiTrap-Q column pre-equilibrated with 0.1 M KCl, 1* loading buffer. This was followed by step elution of fractions at 1* loading buffer with 0.175, 0.35 , 0.7 and 1.0 M KCl, at a flow rate of 1 ml/min (controlled by a Pharmacia Gradifrac System). All steps were repeated with a second batch of ~30 mg protein.

Immunopurification of polymerase I-TBP complex using an anti-FLAG M2 affinity column

The peak fractions for RNA polymerase I transcription components were pooled from two trials (~10 mg total protein). The transcriptional activity was assessed as described below (see also Fig. 4 A). The KCl concentration was adjusted to 0.15 M and the samples were loaded onto a 1 ml anti-FLAGtm M2 affinity gel (Kodak/IBI; binding capacity 25 nmol FLAG protein/ml gel), as recommended. The flow-through was collected and re-loaded; the column was washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Elution of FLAG-TBP and associated polypeptides was conducted using 1 ml elution buffer with increasing concentrations of FLAG peptide (50, 100, 125 and 200 ng/ml), followed by 1 ml 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 3.0. The fraction containing unbound polypeptides was demonstrated to lack TBP by Western analysis (data not shown) and served as the fraction immunodepleted of TBP (see Fig. 7 A and B).

Western blot analysis of TBP complexes using anti-FLAG antibody

An aliquot of 20 [mu]g protein from S-100 extract, or fractions as indicated, was fractionated by 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose using a BioRad SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell. The anti-FLAG antibody (anti-FLAGtm M2 monoclonal antibody; Kodak/IBI) was added at 1:300 dilution, following standard protocols (31 ,33 ). Detection utilized enhanced chemiluminiscent reagents from Amersham and included sheep horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse Ig whole antibody as the secondary antibody.

SYPRO orange protein stain

The SDS-PAGE minigel containing fractionated TBP and associated polypeptides (Fig. 5 A and B) was immersed in 50 ml 1:5000 dilution of SYPRO orange protein stain (BioRad) in 7.5% (v/v) acetic acid and stained and photographed under UV light (34 ).

DNA templates and in vitro transcription reactions

p-243:XH (Fig. 3 ) has been described previously (32 ). p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+31 is a similar template containing promoter sequences from -243 to +31, but in the cloning vector pBS (32 ); it was used in the transcriptional assays shown in Figure 6 A-C. Template p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+89 (32 ) was used in the transcription assays shown in Figure 7 (at a final concentration of 0.5 [mu]g/ml). In vitro transcription reactions were 40 [mu]l and contained 10 [mu]l extract (~50 [mu]g protein) or indicated amounts of fractionated RNA polymerase I transcription components, template DNA (0.025-1.25 [mu]g/ml, as indicated), 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 70-90 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, pH 7.9, 0.05 mM EDTA, pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 1.3 mM DTT, 100-500 [mu]M each of the four ribonucleoside triphosphates (Pharmacia) and 10 [mu]g/ml [alpha]-amanitin (Sigma) and were incubated for 45 min at 26oC (32 ). Transcription in an S.cerevisiae S-100 extract (32 ,35 ) was performed as above, except that ~1 ng FLAG-TBP complex was added, with the final concentration of transcription buffer adjusted to be the same as above. The reconstitution assays (shown in Fig. 7 ) utilized 5 [mu]l S.pombe fraction depleted of TBP and/or 1.0 [mu]l (~1 ng) FLAG-TBP complex. The RNA was isolated and S1 analysis conducted as described (32 ). S1-protected fragments were resolved by electrophoresis on 4% acrylamide- 9 M urea gels; the size markers were 5'-32P-labeled HpaII fragments derived from pBR322. The 5'-end-labeled probe used to detect transcription supported by template p-243:XH was prepared by labeling at the unique XbaI site (+340) on the template strand and converting the DNA to single-stranded as described (32 ). For preparation of the probe used to detect transcription supported by p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+31, 5'-end-labeling was at position +77 on the template strand (at a unique XhoI site). The probe used to detect transcription supported by p5'-243/3'[Delta]+89 probe was labeled at a unique XhoI site at +135 on the template strand. The initiation site for in vitro S.pombe rRNA synthesis was shown to be the same in vitro as in vivo (32 ; see also Fig. 6 C). S1-protected fragments representing rRNAs initiated in vitro in S.cerevisiae or S.pombe S-100 extracts were electrophoresed on sequencing gels next to Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions for mapping the start site (see Fig. 6 C; 31 ).


Figure 2. Fractionation scheme for purification of S.pombe TBP-containing essential initiation factor for RNA polymerase I transcription.

Strains, media and transformation

Schizosaccharomyces pombe S-100 extract made from wild-type strain 972 (h-; kindly sent by Dr H.Levin) was used in control transcription reactions (32 ). The diploid strain used for disruption of tbp+ was S.pombe SP826 h+/h+ leu l-32 ura-4-D18/ura4-18 ade6-216/ade6-210 (kindly sent by Dr Dave Frendewey, NYU Medical Center). The bacterial strains used included: XL1-Blue [endA1, hsdR17 (rk-, mk+), supE44, thi-1, [lambda]-, recA1, gyrA96, relA1, lac, (F', proAB, lacIqZ[Delta]M15, Tn10, (tetr)] and SUREtm [mcrA, [Delta](mcrBC-hsdRMS-mrr)171, endA1, supE44, thi-a, [lambda]-, gyrA96, relA1, lac, recB, recJ, sbcC, umuC::Tn5, (kanr), uvrC, (F', proAB, lacIqZ[Delta]M15, Tn10, (tetr)] (Stratagene). The S.cerevisiae S-100 extract was made from S.cerevisiae W303 [MAT[alpha], ade2-1, his3-11,15, leu-23,112, trp1-1, ura3-1, can1-100 (R.Rothstein)]. Media used included EMM (31 ) and SC medium (32 ). Bacterial cells were transformed by electroporation using a BioRad Gene Pulser (32 ). The lithium acetate transformation method was used for introduction of plasmid DNAs into yeast (31 ,32 ).


Figure 3. Transcriptional analysis of fractionated S.pombe RNA polymerase I components. Following ammonium sulfate precipitation of S.pombe S-100, the pellet was extensively dialyzed and subjected to centrifugation (24) and the resultant supernatant and pellet assessed for RNA polymerase I transcription components. Correctly initiated transcription supported by the template p-243:XH, bearing a full rDNA promoter and rDNA termination sites, was assessed using control S-100 extract (lane 1), supernatant (lane 2) and pellet (lane 3) (~25 [mu]g each). An S1-protected fragment of 340 nt represents correctly initiated RNA (32) and is marked +1. Markers (M) are 32P-labeled pBR/HpaII fragments.

RESULTS

Our strategy to determine whether the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis in fission yeast was stably associated with TBP was to introduce a tagged copy of TBP into S.pombe. This would facilitate detection and localization of TBP during fractionation of RNA polymerase I transcription components and enable immunoaffinity purification of associated factors. To ensure that all TBP coding sequences were epitope tagged, the chromosomal copy of the tbp+ gene was inactivated in a diploid strain using one-step gene disruption (36 ). Such a strain would also facilitate analysis of interactions of the essential initiation factor for RNA polymerase I, SL1, with other RNA polymerase I transcription factors and with the regulatory regions of the S.pombe rRNA gene.

A plasmid was constructed that contained a disrupted copy of the S.pombe TBP coding sequences, named p[Delta]tbp::ura4 (see Fig. 1 A and Materials and Methods for details). One-step gene disruption of the chromosomal tbp+ allele was conducted in diploid strain SP826 of S.pombe, since TBP is an essential gene. Southern analysis confirmed that gene replacement was successful and that a diploid strain was constructed containing one wild-type and one disrupted allele of TBP (see Fig. 1 B). A plasmid bearing an epitope-tagged version of tbp+ cDNA,pRep1/FLAG-S.p.TBP, was constructed and introduced into this [Delta]tbp::ura4/tbp+ diploid strain of S.pombe (see Materials and Methods for details on construction of the FLAGtm epitope-tagged TBP). To ensure high levels of expression, the TBP coding sequences were placed under the control of the nmt promoter (29 ,30 ).

The essential initiation factor for polymerase I catalyzed transcription was fractionated from the resultant haploid strain of S.pombe, based on its presence in transcriptionally active fractions and on affinity purification via the epitope-tagged TBP. The fractionation scheme for purification of the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis is outlined in Figure 2 . Polypeptides that precipitated at 60% ammonium sulfate were collected and dialyzed, as described in Riggs et al. (24 ). However, the S.pombe RNA polymerase I transcription components behaved differently from those of S.cerevisiae, where required RNA polymerase I transcription components formed a sedimentable complex following dialysis of the suspended ammonium sulfate precipitated polypeptides (24 ). In the case of the S.pombe RNA polymerase I transcription factors, they were largely present in the `low salt supernatant' (Fig. 3 , lane 2), although a fraction did form a sedimentable complex (Fig. 3 , lane 3).


Figure 4. (A) Transcriptional analysis of RNA polymerase I components following chromatographic separation on a HiTrap-Q column. Following HiTrap-Q chromatographic separation, fractions eluted at 0.175, 0.35 and 0.7 M KCl were assessed for transcriptional capacity. Five microliters of each fraction were tested for ability to support accurate initiation, using the p-243:XH template (0.1 [mu]g/ml; 32). The first number of the name of the fractions, 1-, 3- or 7-, refers to the KCl concentration of the step cut (0.175, 0.35 or 0.7) and the second number is the fraction number. The S1-resistant fragment representing correctly initiated rRNA is 340 nt in length and is marked (+1). (B) Western analysis of TBP-containing fractions. Approximately 20 [mu]g (unless stated otherwise) of each fraction assessed in (A) were separated on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and challenged with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody M2 (Kodak/IBI). The amounts in lanes that differ from the standard ~20 [mu]g include: for fraction 12, eluted at 0.1 M KCl (1-12; lane 2), 10 [mu]g; 7-41, 10 [mu]g (lane 7); 7-42 (lane 8), 6.5 [mu]g. Lane 9 contains 20 [mu]g control S-100 prepared from wild-type S.pombe cells.


Figure 5. Immunoaffinity purification of S.pombe TBP-associated polypeptides from RNA polymerase I transcription components. The peak fractions containing RNA polymerase I transcription components were pooled and subjected to immunoaffinity purification via an anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel. (A) Resolution of TBP-associated polypeptides eluted from the anti-FLAG affinity matrix at increasing concentrations of FLAG peptide: Lane 1, 25 [mu]l fraction eluted with 50 ng FLAG peptide; lane 2, 235 [mu]l fraction eluted with 100 ng FLAG; lane 3, 25 [mu]l (~1 ng/[mu]l) eluted with 125 ng FLAG. The gel was a 15% SDS-PAGE gel (31). Polypeptides were visualized with SYPRO orange (BioRad; 34). The protein standards were from Sigma (M). (B) Aliquots of 25 [mu]l of fractions eluted with the indicated amounts of FLAG peptide (as in A) were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and visualized as in (A). (C)Western analysis of the same fractions as in (A). Lane 1, fraction eluted with 50 ng FLAG peptide; lane 2, 100 ng; lane 3, 125 ng. The blot was challenged with anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Kodak/IBI) and detected as described in Materials and Methods.


Figure 6. (A) Cross-species transcriptional analysis of the RNA polymerase I transcription complex of FLAG-TBP and associated polypeptides. To assess for S.pombe SL1 activity, the components that co-eluted with TBP were added to S.cerevisiae RNA polymerase I in vitro transcription reactions and RNA polymerase I catalyzed transcriptional initiation supported by the S.pombe rDNA template p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+31 was assessed (lane 3). The control lanes (1 and 2) show S1 analysis of transcription reactions conducted in the absence of added S.pombe SL1, with respectively 10 [mu]l (~50 [mu]g) and 20 [mu]l (~100 [mu]g) S.cerevisiae S-100 extract. Lane 3 shows S1 analysis of a reaction conducted with 20 [mu]l S.cerevisiae S-100 extract plus ~1 ng S.pombe TBP-containing polymerase I complex (+ SpSL1). The arrow points to the alternate transcription start (at +7) on the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter and +1 marks the S1 resistant fragment representing correctly initiated S.pombe rRNAs. The radioactive probe is a single-stranded DNA molecule derived from p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+31 5'-end-labeled with 32P at +77 on the template strand. (B) Transcription of the same S.pombe rDNA template, p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+31, in an S.pombe in vitro transcription reaction is shown, with the S1 resistant fragment representing correctly initiated rRNAs marked with +1. The minor S1-protected fragment of ~92 nt, representing initiation at ~-15, is also seen for in vivo synthesized rRNAs; other minor S1-protected fragments may represent non-specifically initiated rRNAs. (C) S1-protected-fragments representing the alternative polymerase I start on the S.pombe rDNA promoter using S.cerevisiae transcription components (left lane) and the wild-type start using the homologous components (right lane) flank lanes containing Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions. The sequencing ladders are A+G, C+T and C reactions (31). (D) Initiation region of the rRNA genes of S.cerevisiae and S.pombe. The top line shows the sequence of the S.cerevisiae rRNA gene promoter, with the initiation site shown in bold and underlined (+1). The bottom sequence is that of the S.pombe rRNA gene. The initiation site is underlined and in bold and the alternate transcription start at +7 utilized cross-species is underlined.


Figure 7. The S.pombe TBP complex is essential for reconstitution of rDNA transcriptional activity. (A) Transcription reactions utilizing an S.pombe fraction immunodepleted of TBP (Imm.-depl.fr.) together with the fraction containing S.pombe TBP and TBP-associated factors (TBP-complex) reconstituted the activity required for directing correct initiation of the S.pombe rDNA template 5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+89 (lane 1). This activity was inhibited by competition with 2.5 [mu]g/ml rDNA template (lane 2, inactiv. rxn.). Lane 3 is a control lane showing the S1-protected fragment representing correctly initiated rRNAs synthesized in a reaction containing unfractionated S-100 extract (S-100 control). The S1-protected fragment of 135 nt (noted with +1) represents correctly initiated rRNAs. (B) The ability of the TBP complex alone (lane 1, TBP-complex) or the immunodepleted fraction (Imm.-depl.fract., lane 2) to direct correct initiation was assessed. Lane 3 is a control lane showing the S1-protected fragment representing correctly initiated rRNAs (S-100 control). Size markers are end-labeled pBR322/HpaII fragments. The radioactive probe is a single-stranded DNA molecule derived from p5'[Delta]-243/3'[Delta]+89 5'-end- labeled with 32P at +135 on the template strand.

The RNA polymerase I components required for initiation were further fractionated on a Pharmacia HiTrap-Q anion exchanger. Fractions eluted between 0.175 and 0.35 M KCl contained all components required for correct initiation (see Fig. 4 A, lanes 5-7). In addition, FLAG-TBP is detected in these peak fractions, as expected (Fig. 4 B, lanes 4-6). Although fraction 3-26 (lane 3) contains FLAG-TBP, it does not support initiation; this fraction may lack a required component, such as activated polymerase, [alpha]TIF-IC activity (37 -40 ; Guo,A. and Pape,L., unpublished data) or another factor. FLAG-TBP eluted at lower KCl concentration is presumably in the TBP-containing initiation complex for RNA polymerase II or III catalyzed transcription, TFIID (17 -19 ) or TFIIIB (20 -23 ), or is free TBP (Fig. 4 B, lane 2).

The fractions containing the peak rDNA transcriptional activity were combined for further resolution. Immunoaffinity purification of the FLAG-TBP-associated factors present in the fractions active for RNA polymerase I catalyzed initiation was performed using an anti-FLAG antibody-conjugated matrix and the composition and activity of TBP and its associated factors assessed. Polypeptides eluted from the immunoaffinity column with increasing concentrations of FLAG peptide were subjected to fractionation by SDS-PAGE. Western analysis of TBP and TBP-associated polypeptides is shown in Figure 5 C (the composition of the polypeptides fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to membrane is seen in Fig. 5 A). Detection of FLAG-TBP was via the anti-FLAG antibody M2 (Kodak/IBI) and the peak TBP-containing fraction eluted with 125 ng FLAG peptide (Fig. 5 C, lane 3; fractions eluted at 0.2 mg/ml FLAG peptide or with glycine contained significantly less FLAG-TBP; data not shown). The composition of polypeptides eluting with TBP is seen in Figure 5 A, lane 3, and B, lane 2. While multiple polypeptides co-fractionated with TBP, three are marked in Figure 5 B (lane 2) as appearing approximately equimolar and as having sizes correlating with the subunit size of TBP-associated factors present in mammalian SL1/S.cerevisiae polymerase I core factor. An additional four to five polypeptides are also present, including prominent polypeptides of ~42 and ~47 kDa.

To test whether the TBP and its associated polypeptides (seen in Fig. 5 A, lane 3, and B, lane 2) harbor activity for directing correct initiation of rRNA genes, a cross-species assay was performed. Transcriptional initiation of eukaryotic rRNA genes is species specific, with the critical species-specific factor being SL1 (reviewed in 7 ). Thus, correct transcriptional initiation of an S.pombe rRNA gene promoter in a S.cerevisiae RNA polymerase I transcription extract is not apparent (Fig. 6 A). However, an alternate rRNA transcript starting at +7 is produced (see Fig. 6 A, lanes 1 and 2, and C, left lane), while the S.pombe extract directs initiation at the wild-type start site (see Fig. 6 B, lanes 1 and 2, and C, right lane). Addition of the S.pombe FLAG-TBP complex to the heterologous transcription components resulted in repression of the alternate start and in direction of initiation at the correct site (marked +1; see Fig. 6 A, lane 3). Thus, addition of the S.pombe TBP complex revealed two inherent activities: repression of the incorrect start and direction of a correct start on the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter (Fig. 6 A, lane 3).

The S.pombe TBP fraction does not direct initiation on its own (Fig. 7 B, lane 1), but reprograms initiation of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter in conjunction with other required transcription factors supplied in the S.cerevisiae extract. Thus, the complex of TBP and associated factors purified from active S.pombe RNA polymerase I transcription components represents SL1 activity: the S.pombe TBP and TBP-associated factors were able to direct correct initiation of their own species' rRNA gene promoter in a heterologous RNA polymerase I transcription system. While the efficiency of initiation site utilization appears to be low, this may be due to requirements for interactions between an S.pombe SL1 complex and an S.pombe upstream rDNA promoter binding complex.

Further evidence that the S.pombe TBP complex contains SL1 activity comes from reconstitution analysis. Immunodepletion of the S.pombe polymerase I synthetic machinery of TBP and TBP-associated factors abolishes its ability to direct correct rDNA transcriptional initiation (see Fig. 7 B, lane 2). Reconstitution of correct in vitro transcription of the S.pombe rRNA gene promoter requires both this immunodepleted fraction and the immunopurified S.pombe TBP complex (see Fig. 7 A, lane 1).

DISCUSSION

Formation of the complex assembly of factors required to direct correct initiation of eukaryotic rRNA genes involves association of the essential initiation factor SL1 (also called TIF-IB, Rib1 and factor D; 1 -8 ) at an early step in this process (7 ,41 ). This association is promoted by UBF in vertebrates (8 ,41 -43 ), by an enhancer binding factor in Acanthamoeba (44 ) and apparently by an upstream activating factor, UAF (45 ), in S.cerevisiae. An rDNA transcriptional stimulatory activity of S.pombe forms a stable complex with the rDNA promoter and may also promote association of SL1 (Chen,L., Zhao,A., Liu,Z., Boukghalter,B. and Pape,L., submitted for publication).

While TBP is a component of the essential initiation complex for all three nuclear RNA polymerases in yeast (14 ,15 ), its association with the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis initially appeared less stable in the yeast S.cerevisiae (13 ) than was the case for mammalian SL1 complexes (4 ; TIF-IB; 4 ). The TFIID initiation factor for RNA polymerase II catalyzed transcription was initially isolated as the TBP monomer from yeast (46 ), but both TFIIIB and TFIID were later shown to consist of multiple subunits (47 -48 ), akin to the analogous complexes in higher eukaryotes (17 ).

In S.cerevisiae, three of the subunits of an essential transcription factor for rRNA synthesis are Rrn6p, Rrn7p (13 ) and Rrn11p (25 ,26 ). Very recent results demonstrate that these subunits associate with TBP (25 ,26 ). In this paper, we have shown that a fission yeast complex can be immunopurified from active RNA polymerase I transcription components consisting of a tagged TBP and TBP-associated polypeptides. Furthermore, this complex is capable of repressing an incorrect transcriptional start site on a S.pombe rDNA promoter and promoting the correct start cross-species. It is of interest that the yeast, human and mouse subunits of the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis show a similar polypeptide profile. Comparison of the profile of polypeptides co-eluting with TBP and with the profile of polypeptides in the human and mouse SL1 complex (1 ,4 ,11 ), as well as in the multi-subunit initiation complex for S.cerevisiae (13 ,25 ,26 ), suggests that the three TBP-associated polypeptides that may be the S.pombe SL1 TAFIs are the ~64, 74 and ~101 kDa polypeptides, however, assignment awaits sequence determination of these polypeptides. Polypeptides present that are not bona fide TAFIs could be contaminating polypeptides that are detected upon affinity purification of TBP-associated factors (48 ) and yeast TFIID (49 ) or subunits of other polymerase-TBP complexes or subunits of a polymerase I UAF-like complex (50 ).

It remains to be determined what the primary sequence of the S.pombe SL1 TAFs are and whether they share homology with human TAFI110, TAFI63 and TAFI48 (1 ). The subunits of the essential initiation factor for rRNA synthesis in S.cerevisiae, Rrn6p, Rrn7p and Rrn11p (p66) (13 ,25 ,26 ), are unrelated in primary sequence to the mammalian SL1 subunits and efforts to isolate coding sequences for the S.pombe subunits utilizing heterologous mammalian or S.cerevisiae probes have been unsuccessful, suggesting that their primary sequences may also vary significantly from other SL1/core factor subunits.

The association of the essential RNA polymerase I initiation factor with the rDNA core promoter region is critical for rRNA synthesis, but stimulatory factors are required to stabilize this interaction (8 ,42 -46 ,51 ). We have found that S.pombe SL1 can form a weak complex with the S.pombe rDNA promoter (data not shown). Figure 6 D shows a comparison of the core rDNA promoter sequences of S.pombe (32 ) with those of S.cerevisiae (52 ,53 ) and may explain why a transcription start, albeit aberrant, is seen in cross-species transcription of an S.pombe rDNA promoter with S.cerevisiae polymerase I transcription components (Fig. 6 A). Conserved regions extending between -26 and -14 and between -10 and -3 may direct basal level cross-species initiation dependent on this core rDNA promoter, but at an altered initiation site (54 ). Addition of the putative S.pombe SL1 complex results in correct recognition of and association with its own species promoter to direct initiation at the natural start site.

It has not been possible to identify homologous TAFI-encoding genomic sequences in S.pombe as of yet by searching S.pombe sequence databases. This may be due to sequence heterogeneity for all of the TAFIs or simply that the genomic region encoding the TAFIs has not been sequenced. While the S.cerevisiae TAFIIs are highly homologous to their human counterparts (49 ), none of the subunits of the S.cerevisiae essential RNA polymerase I transcription factor, Rrn6p, Rrn7p or Rrn11p (13 ,25 ,26 ), show any defining homology to the TAFI110 and TAFI48 or TAFI63 polypeptides (1 ,55 ). This lends further evidence to differences in factors and mechanisms involved in species-specific rDNA promoter activation. The identity of the interactions directing species-specific RNA polymerase I transcriptional initiation will further our understanding of the evolution of species-specific cis-acting regulatory elements of eukaryotic rRNA genes and, in turn, of the corresponding RNA polymerase I transcriptional machinery that correctly transcribes only its target genes, in both a polymerase class- and a species-specific manner.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by NSF grant MCB-9219220 to L.K.P. and in part by NYU Research Challenge Fund grants. NSF is also thanked for its support of the computing resources through grant BIR-9318128. We thank Drs Alexander Hoffman, Masami Horikoshi and Robert Roeder for S.pombe TBP genomic and cDNA clones and suggestions and we thank Drs Henry Levin and Dave Frendewey for useful suggestions and discussions.

REFERENCES

1 Comai,L., Tanese,N. and Tjian,R. (1992) Cell, 78, 965-976.

2 Smith,S.D., Oriahi,E., Lowe,D., Yang-Yen,H.-F., O'Mahony,D., Rose,K., Chen,K. and Rothblum,L.I. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 3105-3116.

3 Eberhard,D., Tora,L., Egly,J.-M. and Grummt,I. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4180-4186. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Rudloff,U., Eberhard,D., Tora,L., Stunnenberg,H. and Grummt,I. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 2611-2616. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Radebaugh,C.A., Matthews,J.L., Geiss,G.K., Liu,F., Wong,J.M., Bateman,E., Camier,S., Sentenac,A. and Paule,M.R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 597-605.

6 Mishima,Y., Financsek,I., Kominami,R. and Muramatsu,M. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res., 10, 6659-6669. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Sollner-Webb,B. and Tower,J. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 55, 801-830.

8 McStay,B., Hu,C.H., Pikaard,C.S. and Reeder,R.H. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 2297-2303. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Kownin,P., Bateman,E. and Paule,M.R. (1987) Cell, 50, 693-699. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Tower,J. and Sollner-Webb,B. (1987) Cell, 50, 873-883. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Zomerdijk,J.C., Beckmann,H., Comai,L. and Tjian,R. (1994) Science, 266, 2015-2018.

12 Gong,X., Radebaugh,C.A., Geiss,G.K., Simon,M.N. and Paule,M.R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 4956-4963. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Keys,D.A., Vu,L., Steffan,J.S., Dodd,J.A., Yamamoto,R.T., Nogi,Y. and Nomura,M. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 2349-2362.

14 Schultz,M.C., Reeder,R.H. and Hahn,S. (1992) Cell, 69, 697-702.

15 Cormack,B.P. and Struhl,K. (1992) Cell, 69, 685-696.

16 Hernandez,N. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 1291-1308. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Tanese,N. and Tjian,R. (1993) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 58, 179-185. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Meyers,R.E. and Sharp,P.A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7953-7960.

19 Zhou,Q., Boyer,T.G. and Berk,A.J. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 180-187. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Buratowski,S. and Zhou,H. (1992) Cell, 71, 221-230. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Kassavetis,G.A., Nguyen,S.T., Kobayashi,R., Kumar,A., Geiduschek,E.P. and Pisano,M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 9786-9760.

22 Lopez-de-Leon,A., Librizzi,M., Puglia,K. and Willis,I.M. (1992) Cell, 71, 211-220. MEDLINE Abstract

23 McBryant,S.J., Meier,E., Leresche,A., Sharp,S.J., Wolf,V.J. and Gottesfeld, J.M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol., 167, 4639-4647.

24 RiggsD.L., Peterson,C.L., Wickham,J.Q., Miller,L.M., Clarke,E.M., Crowell,J.A. and Sergere,J.C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 6205-6210.

25 Lalo,D., Steffan,J.S., Dodd,J.A. and Nomura,M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271, 21062-21067. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Lin,C.W., Moorefield,B., Payne,J., Aprikian,P., Mitomo,K. and Reeder,R.H. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 6436-6443.

27 Hoffmann,A., Horikoshi,M., Wang,C.K., Schroeder,S., Weil,P.A. and Roeder,R.G. (1990) Genes Dev., 4, 1141-1148. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Fikes,J.D., Becker,D.M., Winston,G. and Guarente,L. (1990) Nature, 346, 291-294.

29 Maundrell,K. (1993) Gene, 123, 127-130. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Moreno,S., Klar,A. and Nurse,P. (1991) Methods Enzymol., 194, 795-823. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Ausubel,F.M., Brent,R., Kingston,R.E., Moore,D.D., Seidman,J.G., Smith,J.A. and Struhl,K. (eds) (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

32 Liu,Z., Chen,L., Zhao,A. and Pape,L. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 659-667. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Zhou,Q., Lieberman,P.M., Boyer,T.G. and Berk,A.J. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 1964-1976. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Schagger,H. and von Jagon,F. (1987) Anal. Biochem., 166, 367.

35 Schultz,M.C., Choe,S.Y. and Reeder,R.H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 1004-1008.

36 Rothstein,R.J. (1983) Methods Enzymol., 101, 202-210.

37 Schnapp,G., Schnapp,A., Rosenbauer,H. and Grummt,I. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 4028-4035. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Yamamoto,R.T., Nogi,Y., Dodd,J.A. and Nomura,M. (1996) EMBO J., 15, 3964-3973.

39 Bateman,E. and Paule,M.R. (1986) Cell, 47, 445-450. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Brun,R.P., Ryan,K. and Sollner-Webb,B. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 5010-5021.

41 Jantzen,H.M., Chow,A.M., King,D.S. and Tjian,R. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 1950-1963.

42 Hempel,W.M., Cavanaugh,A.H., Hannan,R.D., Taylor,L. and Rothblum,L.I. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 557-563.

43 Schnapp,A. and Grummt,I. (1991) J. Biol. Chem., 266, 24588-24595. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Yang,Q., Radebaugh,C.A., Kubaska,W., Geiss,G.K. and Paule,M.R. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 4345-4352. MEDLINE Abstract

45 Keys,D.A., Lee,B.-S., Dodd,J.A., Nguyeu,T.T., Vu,L., Fantino,E., Burson,L.M., Nogi,Y. and Nomura,M. (1996) Genes Dev., 10, 887-903.

46 Hahn,S., Buratowski,S., Sharp,P.A. and Guarente,L. (1989) Cell, 58, 1173-1181. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Poon,D. and Weil,P.A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268, 15325-15328. MEDLINE Abstract

48 Kwon,H. and Green,M.R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 30140-30146. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Poon,D., Bai,Y., Campbell,A.M., Bjorklund,S., Kim,Y.J., Zhou,S., Kornberg,R.D. and Weil,P.A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 8224-8228. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Steffan,J.S., Keys,D.A., Dodd,J.A. and Nomura,M. (1996) Genes Dev., 10, 2551-2563.

51 Kulkens,T., Riggs,D.L., Heck,J.D., Planta,R.J. and Nomura,M. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 5363-5370. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Choe,S.Y., Schultz,M.C. and Reeder,R.H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 279-285.

53 Ruppert,S., Wang,E.H. and Tjian,R. (1993) Nature, 362, 175-179. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Pape,L.K., Windle,J.J. and Sollner-Webb,B. (1990) Genes Dev., 4, 52-62.

55 Comai,L., Zomerdikj,J.C.l, Beckmann,H., Zhou,S., Admon,A. and Tjian,R. (1994) Science, 266, 1966-1972. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 212 998 8444; Fax: +1 212 260 7905; Email: papel01@mcrcr.med.nyu.edu

+Present address: Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Liu, A. Guo, B. Boukhgalter, K. Van Den Heuvel, M. Tripp, and L. Pape
Characterization of the fission yeast ribosomal DNA binding factor: components share homology with Upstream Activating Factor and with SWI/SNF subunits
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2002; 30(24): 5347 - 5359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Hamada, Y. Huang, T. M. Lowe, and R. J. Maraia
Widespread Use of TATA Elements in the Core Promoters for RNA Polymerases III, II, and I in Fission Yeast
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 6870 - 6881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Huang, M. Hamada, and R. J. Maraia
Isolation and Cloning of Four Subunits of a Fission Yeast TFIIIC Complex That Includes an Ortholog of the Human Regulatory Protein TFIIICbeta
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2000; 275(40): 31480 - 31487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (169K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?