| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors
Introduction
Data
Data types introduction
Primary data
Secondary data
Other data
Dissemination Facilities
Browsing
Retrieval
Query
Inferences
Discussion
Usage And Availability
Acknowledgements
References
GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consist of a single protein chain that crosses the membrane seven times. These, presumably [alpha]-helical, transmembrane regions are probably arranged with similarity (1) to bacteriorhodopsin. Except for low resolution electron diffraction studies of frog and bovine rhodopsins (2,3) and NMR structures of fragments of loops of the bovine rhodopsin receptor (4-6) not much solid structural information is available. GPCRs are of enormous importance for the pharmaceutical industry because 52% of all existing medicines act on a GPCR (7). This explains why so many three dimensional models of GPCRs have been built. Most models are based on the atomic coordinates of the bacteriorhodopsin structure. In all of these modeling studies (bio)chemical and pharmacological data had to be used to refine the models. Clearly, mutation data and structure-affinity relationships (SARs) are essential for modeling studies aimed at the analysis of receptor-ligand interactions.
It is also possible to arrive at detailed structural knowledge using sequence analysis techniques combined with extensive data mining rather than via the path of building models. Correlated mutation studies, for example, have shown great potential for the determination of inter molecular contacts between GPCRs and their G proteins or ligands (9,10), for drug design purposes, for analyzing the role of olfactory receptors in the organization of the olfactorial nerve system (8) etc. None of these correlated mutation studies could have been performed without the availability of large amounts of experimental data.
Due to the lack of high resolution structural data, theoretical research on GPCRs relies on the availability and easy accessibility of all available data in an information system that allows for the four basic data dissemination functions: browsing, retrieval, querying and inferencing. Additionally, this information system should provide tools for data gathering, data input, data validation and data annotation. We will first discuss the data and then the four dissemination facilities (see also Fig. 1). In all cases we will discuss the present situation and the plans for the near future.
Figure

DATA
Data types introduction
The GPCRDB holds three kinds of experimental data: sequences, mutation data and ligand binding data. All three data types have their own specific problems. Sequences can be wrong, truncated, or can occur in several alternative translations. The interpretation of mutation studies and ligand bindings studies depend strongly on experimental conditions such as cell type, stable/transient transfection, density of e.g. receptors, second messenger assay, and the kinds of ligands used.
Additional data (types) can easily be incorporated in the GPCRDB. We will, however, only enter new data types if a certain degree of completeness can be reached, and if a mechanism for updating exists. We would like to add data about, for example, the preferred G protein, receptor localization, second messenger, etc., but at present it does not seem likely that a high degree of completeness can be reached for these kinds of data.
The number of experimental data types is limited, but there are no limits to the number of data types that can be derived computationally. It is therefore important to think about the questions that the GPCRDB should help answer when adding more and more computational data. At present the central computational data type is multiple sequence alignments (for which a method was designed that is dedicated for GPCRs; 11). Phylogenetic trees and correlated mutation analyses (CMA; 11) are derived from these multiple sequence alignments.
Visualization of data is important for the human users of the system. In the GPCR field two dimensional representations by so-called snake like diagrams (or snakes for short) are commonly used to visually combine a sequence with other types of information such as three dimensional localization, mutation results, ligand binding or biochemical studies. In the GPCRDB there is a snake for every sequence, and these diagrams are hyperlinked to the most important related data types.
It is not a very big job to keep the computationally derived data complete, but the extraction of the underlying experimental data from literature is such an overwhelming task that in the long run it cannot be done without the help of the experimental scientists around the world. Convincing the community that there is mutual benefit for individuals to infrequently invest small amounts of time entering data might be a more daunting task than all other aspects of the GPCRDB project. Moreover, the direct input of data by the experimentalists allows the incorporation of non-published data in the GPCRDB. The inclusion of such data will prevent researchers from reinventing the wheel.
Primary data
In the September 1997 release of the GPCRDB, more than 800 GPCR sequences are available, divided into five major and 151 minor sub-families.
Sequence fragments are deleterious for most computational purposes but they do hold useful information. At present (September 1997) we have stored 74 sequence fragments, extracted from SWISS-PROT. In the near future, putative GPCR ESTs (Expressed Sequence Tags) will be added.
Mutation data. The GRAP database (13) and its derivative, TinyGRAP, holds information for about 3900 point mutations. Some data on chimeric, deletion and insertion mutations is also available in the GRAP database and the planning is to include more of such mutations in the near future. This information is accessible directly (14), from the Viseur site (15) and from the GPCRDB. In the GPCRDB this data is available in several forms, the most prominent of which is hyperlinking from the snakes. Presently, GRAP focuses on class A receptors but an input form to add mutant data for all classes is available, and by the time this article goes to press, the first 100 class B mutations will have been entered. We strongly encourage the experimental scientists in the GPCR field to enter their mutation data into the GRAP database via the WWW input form available from the GPCRDB pages.Ligand binding data. Ligand binding data was obtained from P.Seeman (16). This very impressive collection of drug dissociation constants was manually extracted from the literature. Seeman collected data for neuroreceptors and transporters. About 12 000 dissociation constants are available for 10 GPCR families. The heterogeneity of the experimental conditions make it hard to use this data for query purposes because it is not possible to determine the value of the numbers without human interpretation. However, the data is very useful for browsing purposes. The data was originally stored in tables that were sorted by receptor type, but in the near future the data will be stored internally in a data structure that will allow for alternative visualization methods such as sorting by ligand, and for hyperlinking to facilitate more natural browsing behavior by the users.Secondary data
Throughout the GPCRDB we have used the residue numbering scheme suggested by Oliveira et al. (11). In this numbering scheme the residues are numbered such that 100s digits indicates the helix number, and the most conserved residue in every helix has a round number.
Alternative alignments will be incorporated if submitted to the GPCRDB.
Phylogenetic trees. Phylogenetic trees are a good visualization tool for relationships between sequences in a family. This information can help in answering several different kinds of questions, e.g., questions related to ligand design. Making phylogenetic trees is a whole science in itself. The WHAT IF program uses a neighbor joining algorithm. Although the resultant phylogenetic trees represent, as good as possible, the pairwise identities between the sequences rather than their evolutionary relationships, there is a striking resemblance with phylogenetic trees based on an accepted-mutation parsimony method (20). The phylogenetic trees presently available in the GPCRDB were made of manually selected representative subsets of sequences. We envisage producing these trees automatically, in parallel with the multiple sequence alignments. Correlated mutation data. Correlated mutation analysis is a computational method to identify pairs of sequence positions that remained conserved or mutated in tandem during evolution. The idea behind the search for such pairs of residues is that when a mutation occurs at a functionally important site, the protein either becomes non-functional or may acquire its original or a different function due to a compensatory mutation at another position. Residues detected by the CMA method are often involved in intermolecular interactions (between ligands and receptors or G-proteins and receptors) (9,10). Although a detailed explanation for this phenomenon is beyond the scope of this article, it must be clear that the automatic detection of `important' residues is a relevant aspect of the GPCRDB effort. Snake like diagrams. Experimentalists in the GPCR field prefer to represent their data using snakes (Fig. 2). The Viseur (15) program can automatically generate snakes and hyperlink them to other types of information. Snakes are used in the GPCRDB to represent two kinds of data. One set of snakes is hyperlinked to the TinyGRAP mutant database. The second set is used to indicate the location of residues detected in the CMA analyses. This second set is hyperlinked to the corresponding HSSP alignment files.
Figure

Other data
The GPCRDB additionally contains pointers to other GPCR related databases (Fig. 3). General information about GPCRs, articles about the GPCRDB or elements of its contents, lists of GPCR specialists addresses, pointers to external pages of different levels of relevance for GPCR research (information resources, articles, group pages, GPCR related diseases, etc.) are available. The SWISS-PROT files allow for navigation to other databases like Medline (22), OMIM (23), EMBL (24), PIR (25), Prosite (26) and several organism specific databases such as FlyBase (27) for Drosophila sequences. The mutation data in GRAP is hyperlinked to Medline and OMIM.
Figure 
DISSEMINATION FACILITIES
GPCRDB has been conceived to provide fast and easy access to all information related to GPCRs. It should be an information tool that makes it easier for the user to think about GPCRs, and it should make suggestions for future research. For this purposes we have implemented, (and are still implementing) the four basic information system tools: browsing, retrieval, query and inferencing.
Browsing
The GPCRDB organization is based on the pharmacological classification of receptors and access to the data is obtained via a hierarchical list of known families in agreement with this classification. For one specific family, one can access the individual sequences, the multiple alignments, the profile used to perform the latter, the snakes and a phylogenetic tree. Each type of data is displayed in a WWW page with hyperlinks to other data where appropriate. Figure 4 shows the WWW page for the adrenergic receptor class as an example of the data organization.
Figure

Retrieval
Often a user wants to work on certain data at home, independent of the GPCRDB environment. Therefore most data can be retrieved in its native form using the `save as' option of the WWW browsers or via anonymous FTP from www.gpcr.org, data being stored in the /7tm directory.
Query
A BLAST server allows the user to scan one GPCR sequence, or the fragment of it against all GPCRDB sequences. This can give for new sequences an impression about the family they belong too.
A query system is under development. In due time it will answer complicated questions such as, for example: `are there any mutant or CMA data for position 340 of the [alpha]2 adrenergic receptors?' The current version supports simple sequence queries by specifying query conditions on specific fields using pattern matching by means of regular expressions that can be freely combined using the logical connectors `and, `or' and `not'. It will be soon possible to combine these typical database queries with less exact ones such as the sequence similarity defined by FASTA. This query facility is accessed via a WWW interface that performs conversion of the users input to the query interface of the underlying database system and a formatted presentation of query results.
Inferences
Lacking high resolution structure data, correlated mutation analyses are the most powerful tool available to date for the computational discovery of novel facts about GPCRs. The CMA clearly provide a powerful inference engine. At the cost of little CPU time, the important residue positions are selected from among the tens of thousands of residues in each alignment. So far we only calculate these residues and make them available for browsing purposes by displaying them as snakes with the appropriate hyperlinks. We will try to combine this information with experimental data (i.e. mutation data and ligand binding data) to strengthen the conclusions that can be drawn and to make it easier for the GPCRDB users to investigate their relevance.
DISCUSSION
The GPCRDB is now officially one year old. In this first year we have created a computer infrastructure that flexibly allows for extension with new data types, experimental as well as computational. Many improvements can still be made. These improvements will be directed along four lines: (i) addition of new experimental data types (ligand information, preferred G protein, cellular localization, secondary messenger, disease pattern, chimera data); (ii) addition of new theoretical data types (docked ligands, codon usage); (iii) addition of hyperlinks to other databases (mouse knock-out database, genetic diseases, etc.); (iv) user-friendliness. It is envisaged that the GPCRDB will function in the same way as an encyclopedia. One opens it with the aim of answering a question, but multiple good ideas later one has forgotten what the original question was. In other words, the GPCRDB should be more than intuitive-suggestive.
The most complicated aspect of the GPCRDB effort is the actual incorporation of data. The vast majority of all useful data is stored in articles rather than in computer readable form. We are providing tools to enter data into the database, but convincing experimentalists that it is in their own interest to participate with their data for usage by the community is another important aspect.
USAGE AND AVAILABILITY
The GPCRDB is accessible from http://www.gpcr.org/7tm/ . The underlying data files (alignments, models, etc.) can be downloaded by anonymous FTP from www.gpcr.org/7tm/. Access to the GPCRDB is free for academic and industrial scientists. Industries can download the entire GPCRDB for in-house usage from the same FTP site. In the first year of its existence the GPCRDB has been `visited' on average 250 times per week.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The GPCRDB is an EU sponsored project (PL 950224). We thank K.Aberer, R.Bywater, G.Casari, U.Gsbel, R.W.W.Hooft, F.Kolakowski, K.Kristiansen, W.Kuipers, L.Oliveira, C.Sander, F.Rippmann, A.Valencia, E.M.van der Wenden and A.P.IJzerman for stimulating discussions. F.C. acknowledges Centre Charles Hermite and Sanofi Recherche for support. G.V. thanks the BMFT for support to the RELIWE project. We also thank Novo Nordisk Copenhagen Denmark, Solvay Weesp the Netherlands, E. Merck Darmstadt Germany and IRBM Rome Italy for testing aspects of the GPCRDB.
REFERENCES
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 17 Dec 1997
Copyright© Oxford University Press, 1998.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Zhou and Z. Shang 2D molecular graphics: a flattened world of chemistry and biology Brief Bioinform, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 247 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kleinau and G. Krause Thyrotropin and Homologous Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors: Structural and Functional Aspects of Extracellular Signaling Mechanisms Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2009; 30(2): 133 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pabuwal and Z. Li Network pattern of residue packing in helical membrane proteins and its application in membrane protein structure prediction Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 3, 2008; (2008) gzm059v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Bee and E. C. Hulme Functional Analysis of Transmembrane Domain 2 of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32471 - 32479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Liu, Y. Lin, X. Wen, R. N. Jorissen, and M. K. Gilson BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D198 - D201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Donizelli, M.-A. Djite, and N. L. Novere LGICdb: a manually curated sequence database after the genomes Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D267 - D269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Postma and G. H. Koppelman Confirmation of GPRA: A Putative Drug Target for Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2005; 171(12): 1323 - 1324. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J C R Cardoso, M S Clark, F A Viera, P D Bridge, A Gilles, and D M Power The secretin G-protein-coupled receptor family: teleost receptors J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 753 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Balasubramanian, Y. Xia, E. Freinkman, and M. Gerstein Sequence variation in G-protein-coupled receptors: analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms Nucleic Acids Res., March 22, 2005; 33(5): 1710 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Wruck, H. Funke-Kaiser, T. Pufe, H. Kusserow, M. Menk, J. H. Schefe, M. L. Kruse, M. Stoll, and T. Unger Regulation of Transport of the Angiotensin AT2 Receptor by a Novel Membrane-Associated Golgi Protein Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 57 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Vargas and M. von Zastrow Identification of a Novel Endocytic Recycling Signal in the D1 Dopamine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37461 - 37469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Becker, Y. Marantz, S. Shacham, B. Inbal, A. Heifetz, O. Kalid, S. Bar-Haim, D. Warshaviak, M. Fichman, and S. Noiman G protein-coupled receptors: In silico drug discovery in 3D PNAS, August 3, 2004; 101(31): 11304 - 11309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pandey and S. M. Assmann The Arabidopsis Putative G Protein-Coupled Receptor GCR1 Interacts with the G Protein {alpha} Subunit GPA1 and Regulates Abscisic Acid Signaling PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(6): 1616 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Beukers, J. van Oppenraaij, P. P. W. van der Hoorn, C. C. Blad, H. d. Dulk, J. Brouwer, and A. P. IJzerman Random Mutagenesis of the Human Adenosine A2B Receptor Followed by Growth Selection in Yeast. Identification of Constitutively Active and Gain of Function Mutations Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 702 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, L.-O. Gerlach, J. S. Jakobsen, R. T. Skerlj, G. J. Bridger, and T. W. Schwartz Molecular Mechanism of AMD3100 Antagonism in the CXCR4 Receptor: TRANSFER OF BINDING SITE TO THE CXCR3 RECEPTOR J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 3033 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawasawa, L. M. McKenzie, D. P. Hill, H. Bono, RIKEN GER Group, GSL Members, and M. Yanagisawa G Protein-Coupled Receptor Genes in the FANTOM2 Database Genome Res., June 1, 2003; 13(6): 1466 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Breton, J. Danyluk, J.-B. F. Charron, and F. Sarhan Expression Profiling and Bioinformatic Analyses of a Novel Stress-Regulated Multispanning Transmembrane Protein Family from Cereals and Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, May 1, 2003; 132(1): 64 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Vassilatis, J. G. Hohmann, H. Zeng, F. Li, J. E. Ranchalis, M. T. Mortrud, A. Brown, S. S. Rodriguez, J. R. Weller, A. C. Wright, et al. The G protein-coupled receptor repertoires of human and mouse PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4903 - 4908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Babcock, M. Farzan, and J. Sodroski Ligand-independent Dimerization of CXCR4, a Principal HIV-1 Coreceptor J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3378 - 3385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tsukada, M. Iwai, J. Nishiu, M. Itoh, H. Tomoike, M. Horiuchi, Y. Nakamura, and T. Tanaka Inhibition of Experimental Intimal Thickening in Mice Lacking a Novel G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Circulation, January 21, 2003; 107(2): 313 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. J. van Durme, E. Bettler, S. Folkertsma, F. Horn, and G. Vriend NRMD: Nuclear Receptor Mutation Database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2003; 31(1): 331 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Kukkonen, T. Holmqvist, S. Ammoun, and K. E. O. Akerman Functions of the orexinergic/hypocretinergic system Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): C1567 - C1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hosoi, Y. Koguchi, E. Sugikawa, A. Chikada, K. Ogawa, N. Tsuda, N. Suto, S. Tsunoda, T. Taniguchi, and T. Ohnuki Identification of a Novel Human Eicosanoid Receptor Coupled to Gi/o J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 31459 - 31465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kochl, M. Alken, C. Rutz, G. Krause, A. Oksche, W. Rosenthal, and R. Schulein The Signal Peptide of the G Protein-coupled Human Endothelin B Receptor Is Necessary for Translocation of the N-terminal Tail across the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(18): 16131 - 16138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Crasto, L. Marenco, P. Miller, and G. Shepherd Olfactory Receptor Database: a metadata-driven automated population from sources of gene and protein sequences Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 354 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Edvardsen, A. L. Reiersen, M. W. Beukers, and K. Kristiansen tGRAP, the G-protein coupled receptors mutant database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 361 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Robbins, A. R. Calver, A. K. Filippov, W. D. Hirst, R. B. Russell, M. D. Wood, S. Nasir, A. Couve, D. A. Brown, S. J. Moss, et al. GABAB2 Is Essential for G-Protein Coupling of the GABAB Receptor Heterodimer J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8043 - 8052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Babcock, T. Mirzabekov, W. Wojtowicz, and J. Sodroski Ligand Binding Characteristics of CXCR4 Incorporated into Paramagnetic Proteoliposomes J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2001; 276(42): 38433 - 38440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Gouldson, M. K. Dean, C. R. Snell, R. P. Bywater, G. Gkoutos, and C. A. Reynolds Lipid-facing correlated mutations and dimerization in G-protein coupled receptors Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 1, 2001; 14(10): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Beukers, H. den Dulk, E. W. van Tilburg, J. Brouwer, and A. P. Ijzerman Why Are A2B Receptors Low-Affinity Adenosine Receptors? Mutation of Asn273 to Tyr Increases Affinity of Human A2B Receptor for 2-(1-Hexynyl)adenosine Mol. Pharmacol., April 13, 2001; 58(6): 1349 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Horn, G. Vriend, and F. E. Cohen Collecting and harvesting biological data: the GPCRDB and NucleaRDB information systems Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 346 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Hinke, J. A. Pospisilik, H.-U. Demuth, S. Mannhart, K. Kuhn-Wache, T. Hoffmann, E. Nishimura, R. A. Pederson, and C. H. S. McIntosh Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPIV/CD26) Degradation of Glucagon. CHARACTERIZATION OF GLUCAGON DEGRADATION PRODUCTS AND DPIV-RESISTANT ANALOGS J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2000; 275(6): 3827 - 3834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Marin, A. G. Krishna, T. A. Zvyaga, J. Isele, F. Siebert, and T. P. Sakmar The Amino Terminus of the Fourth Cytoplasmic Loop of Rhodopsin Modulates Rhodopsin-Transducin Interaction J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2000; 275(3): 1930 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Skoufos, L. Marenco, P. M. Nadkarni, P. L. Miller, and G. M. Shepherd Olfactory Receptor Database: a sensory chemoreceptor resource Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 341 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Devoto, P. Piffanelli, I. Nilsson, E. Wallin, R. Panstruga, G. von Heijne, and P. Schulze-Lefert Topology, Subcellular Localization, and Sequence Diversity of the Mlo Family in Plants J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 34993 - 35004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Oliveira, A.C.M. Paiva, and G. Vriend A low resolution model for the interaction of G proteins with G protein-coupled receptors Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 1999; 12(12): 1087 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang, J. M. Egan, B. D. Rodgers, M. Bernier, and C. Montrose-Rafizadeh Differential Expression of a Novel Seven Transmembrane Domain Protein in Epididymal Fat from Aged and Diabetic Mice Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2859 - 2867. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Baranski, P. Herzmark, O. Lichtarge, B. O. Gerber, J. Trueheart, E. C. Meng, T. Iiri, S. P. Sheikh, and H. R. Bourne C5a Receptor Activation. GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL RESIDUES IN FOUR TRANSMEMBRANE HELICES J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 1999; 274(22): 15757 - 15765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Portois, B. Maget, M. Tastenoy, J. Perret, and M. Svoboda Identification of a Glucose Response Element in the Promoter of the Rat Glucagon Receptor Gene J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 8181 - 8190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mirzadegan, F. Diehl, B. Ebi, S. Bhakta, I. Polsky, D. McCarley, M. Mulkins, G. S. Weatherhead, J.-M. Lapierre, J. Dankwardt, et al. Identification of the Binding Site for a Novel Class of CCR2b Chemokine Receptor Antagonists. BINDING TO A COMMON CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR MOTIF WITHIN THE HELICAL BUNDLE J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25562 - 25571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liang, C. Mallari, M. Rosser, H. P. Ng, K. May, S. Monahan, J. G. Bauman, I. Islam, A. Ghannam, B. Buckman, et al. Identification and Characterization of a Potent, Selective, and Orally Active Antagonist of the CC Chemokine Receptor-1 J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2000; 275(25): 19000 - 19008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Govaerts, C. Blanpain, X. Deupi, S. Ballet, J. A. Ballesteros, S. J. Wodak, G. Vassart, L. Pardo, and M. Parmentier The TXP Motif in the Second Transmembrane Helix of CCR5. A STRUCTURAL DETERMINANT OF CHEMOKINE-INDUCED ACTIVATION J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 13217 - 13225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Govaerts, A. Lefort, S. Costagliola, S. J. Wodak, J. A. Ballesteros, J. Van Sande, L. Pardo, and G. Vassart A Conserved Asn in Transmembrane Helix 7 Is an On/Off Switch in the Activation of the Thyrotropin Receptor J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22991 - 22999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tokita, T. Katsuno, S. J. Hocart, D. H. Coy, M. Llinares, J. Martinez, and R. T. Jensen Molecular Basis for Selectivity of High Affinity Peptide Antagonists for the Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2001; 276(39): 36652 - 36663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Labrou, N. Bhogal, C. R. Hurrell, and J. B. C. Findlay Interaction of Met297 in the Seventh Transmembrane Segment of the Tachykinin NK2 Receptor with Neurokinin A J. Biol. Chem., October 5, 2001; 276(41): 37944 - 37949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Tibaduiza, C. Chen, and M. Beinborn A Small Molecule Ligand of the Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Targets Its Amino-terminal Hormone Binding Domain J. Biol. Chem., October 5, 2001; 276(41): 37787 - 37793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Remm and E. Sonnhammer Classification of Transmembrane Protein Families in the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome and Identification of Human Orthologs Genome Res., November 1, 2000; 10(11): 1679 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
















