Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (167K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J., 3rd
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 2298-2305  


Effects of phosphate neutralization on the shape of the AP-1 transcription factor binding site in duplex DNA
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   Oligonucleotides
   Gel electrophoresis and data analysis
Results And Discussion
   Experimental design
   Helical repeat of DNA duplexes
   Intrinsic DNA curvature within the AP-1 site
   DNA bending by phosphate neutralization within the AP-1 site
   Alternative explanations
   Comparing bZIP and `phantom' proteins
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References


Effects of phosphate neutralization on the shape of the AP-1 transcription factor binding site in duplex DNA

Effects of phosphate neutralization on the shape of the AP-1 transcription factor binding site in duplex DNA

Laura A. Tomky, Juliane K. Strauss-Soukup1,+, L. James Maher, III*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA and 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA

Received February 18, 1998; Revised and Accepted March 30, 1998

ABSTRACT

Previous electrophoretic experiments suggest that the AP-1 site in duplex DNA bends in response to the pattern of amino acid charges distal to the basic region in bound bZIP proteins. The extent and direction of apparent DNA bending are consistent with the prediction that DNA will collapse locally upon asymmetric phosphate charge neutralization. To prove that asymmetric phosphate neutralization could produce the observed degree of DNA bending, the present experiments partially substitute anionic phosphate diesters in the AP-1 site with various numbers of neutral methylphosphonate linkages. DNA bending is induced toward the neutralized face of DNA. The degree of DNA bending induced by methylphosphonate substitution (~3.5° per neutralized phosphate) is comparable to that induced by GCN4 variants carrying increasing numbers of additional basic amino acids. It is plausible, therefore, that asymmetric phosphate neutralization is the cause of DNA bending in such complexes.

INTRODUCTION

Naked duplex DNA behaves as a stiff, worm-like coil. DNA stiffness can be described in terms of persistence length, the distance over which a segment of the molecule tends to remain in a linear trajectory (1). This parameter is estimated to be ~150 bp for duplex DNA (2). Because of its inherent stiffness, the biologically-relevant bending and folding of DNA into compact nucleoprotein structures such as nucleosomes (3), recombination complexes (4) and transcription complexes (2,5,6) requires energy. This energy is provided by favorable protein-DNA interactions. Can DNA bending by proteins be understood in terms of simple principles? Besides their fundamental significance, appreciation of such principles might allow the design of artificial DNA bending agents.

High resolution structural information suggests that at least two motifs exist in nucleoprotein complexes involving bent DNA. These two motifs suggest different underlying mechanisms. An important class of DNA bending proteins (here termed Class 1) contact bent DNA on its convex surface, such that the double helix curves away from the bound protein. Molecules in this class include TBP (7,8), HMG box proteins such as SRY and LEF-1 (9,10), and others that are often classified as `architectural' binding proteins (10-12). One mechanism of DNA bending by Class 1 DNA bending proteins involves intercalation of hydrophobic amino acids between base pairs in the minor groove of DNA, dramatically enlarging this groove, and thereby altering the helix axis (10,12). It has been suggested that the relatively low dielectric character of the intercalated protein enhances interphosphate repulsions within the double helix, contributing to DNA deformation in these cases (13).

A second class of DNA bending proteins (here termed Class 2) is exemplified by the histone octamer, responsible for the remarkable wrapping of ~150 bp of DNA by almost 720° in the nucleosome (3). Many other Class 2 DNA bending proteins have been described (14-17). Class 2 proteins contact bent DNA on its concave surface, curving the double helix toward the bound protein. The engaged surfaces of Class 2 proteins typically contain cationic amino acids, suggesting an important role for electrostatic interactions.

We are interested in learning how electrostatic effects contribute to DNA bending by Class 2 proteins. One interpretation is that bending occurs to maximize the protein-DNA interface, driven by the free energy release associated with favorable Coulombic interactions. We have been exploring a second interpretation, originally suggested by Mirzabekov and Rich (18), and subsequently addressed mathematically by Manning and co-workers (19). According to this model, the asymmetric neutralization of partial DNA phosphate charges by the cationic surface of a Class 2 protein alters the balance of electrostatic forces present within the DNA double helix. In particular, cancellation of phosphate charges on one helical face of DNA should promote `collapse' of the DNA toward that surface, under the `weight' of the unbalanced interphosphate repulsions remaining on the opposite face of the helix.

We have undertaken a series of experiments to test this intriguing (if less intuitive) model for DNA bending by Class 2 proteins. Our strategy has been to simulate the electrostatic consequences of protein binding by chemical synthesis of DNA duplexes in which the charge distribution is altered by partial substitution with either neutral phosphate analogs (20-22), or tethered cations (23,24). DNA shape is then indirectly monitored by electrophoresis experiments. In support of the model in question, these studies have consistently shown that asymmetric phosphate neutralization causes moderate DNA bending in the predicted direction. DNA bending would not be anticipated in these model systems if the mechanism of Class 2 proteins involved only maximization of favorable charge-charge interactions between protein and DNA, because no proteins are present in the experiments.

The present work was motivated by our desire to apply the predictions of asymmetric phosphate neutralization to specific DNA sequences thought to be bent when complexed with proteins. The case of dimeric basic-zipper (bZIP) DNA binding proteins including Fos/Jun (25), Jun/Jun, CREB (26) and GCN4 (27) is particularly intriguing. Electrophoretic phasing experiments suggest that different members of this family have different effects on DNA shape (28-31). The intrinsic shapes of the binding sites for these proteins in DNA have also been shown to be significant (26,32). Amino acids adjacent to the basic region of each bZIP monomer lie near the DNA double helix. It was noted that the pattern of charged amino acid residues in this region correlates with apparent DNA bending in the resulting complex (Fig. 1A; 26,30). The significance of this relationship has been directly demonstrated by showing that changing the charges of these residues induces apparent changes in the bend angle of bound DNA (33-36). The character (anionic or cationic) and net charge of the protein surface have been shown to correlate with apparent DNA bend direction. If cationic amino acids are present, DNA bending is induced away from the leucine zipper of the bound protein so that, from the perspective of its N-termini, the protein dimer behaves as a Class 2 bending protein (Fig. 1B). In studies of both modified Fos/Jun (33), and GCN4 proteins (34-36), the degree of DNA bending within the AP-1 recognition sequence responds to the total charge of the bZIP protein in this region. Interestingly, the presence of anionic amino acids in these positions was observed to produce proportional DNA bending in the opposite direction, consistent with a role for charge repulsion in determining DNA shape (36). Thus, from the perspective of the N-termini of GCN4 mutant proteins, conversion of cationic amino acids to anionic amino acids effectively converts the dimers from Class 2 to Class 1 bending proteins.


Figure 1. Experimental design. (A) Certain bZIP proteins (e.g. GCN4 homodimers) are thought to bind the AP-1 site without introducing major distortions into the DNA. The amino acids just N-terminal to the basic region in such proteins (black) tend to be neutral. (B) Other bZIP proteins and GCN4 derivatives with cationic amino acids just N-terminal to the basic region (indicated by +) position these residues on one face of the DNA and appear in electrophoretic phasing assays to induce DNA bending toward the minor groove. The bending force presumably involves either attraction of the anionic double helix toward the cationic amino acids or collapse of the double helix due to laterally asymmetric phosphate neutralization. (C) If DNA bending arises from asymmetric phosphate neutralization, an AP-1 site containing neutralized phosphates should spontaneously bend to mimic the effect of bZIP protein binding. Such bending is not predicted according to an `attraction' model. The structure of the neutral methylphosphonate internucleoside linkage is shown below. Racemic mixtures of methylphosphonate stereoisomers were used in this study. (B and C) DNA bending is exaggerated for clarity.

The observation that cationic amino acids positioned on one DNA face induce apparent DNA collapse toward that face suggests that such bZIP proteins act as Class 2 DNA bending molecules. However, the electrostatic mechanism of DNA bending is not revealed in such experiments. Both direct Coulombic attraction (33) and asymmetric phosphate neutralization (34,35) have been proposed to explain these data. To directly test the hypothesis that asymmetric phosphate neutralization is responsible for DNA bending by cationic domains of these bZIP proteins, we have now applied the `phantom protein' strategy to measure the effect of partial phosphate neutralization on the shape of the AP-1 site in duplex DNA. Our approach is shown in Figure 1B and C. DNA duplexes containing AP-1 sites have been synthesized such that certain phosphates are chemically neutralized (Fig. 1C). These neutralizations are intended to mimic the effects of various numbers of cationic amino acids positioned along the DNA minor groove, opposite to the leucine zipper of a bound bZIP protein (Fig. 1B). DNA bending is predicted according to the asymmetric phosphate neutralization hypothesis, but not if the bending force involves `attraction' of the DNA to the protein.

The results of our experiments show that partial phosphate neutralization within the AP-1 sequence induces DNA bending. Induced bending is both qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that induced by GCN4 variants thought to position cationic amino acids on one face of the DNA helix.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oligonucleotides

Oligonucleotides were prepared as previously described (37). All oligomers were purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, eluted from gel slices, and desalted using C18 reverse phase cartridges. Oligonucleotide concentrations were determined at 260 nm using molar extinction coefficients (M-1 cm-1) of 15 400 (A), 11 700 (G), 7300 (C), 8800 (T) assuming no hypochromicity. Compositions of oligonucleotides containing methylphosphonate substitutions were verified by massspectrometry.

Gel electrophoresis and data analysis

Analysis of DNA shape was performed by comparative gel electrophoresis of ligated DNA duplexes through native polyacrylamide gels as has been described (20,38). Relative curvature values were determined as in previous studies (20,38,39). Briefly, the distance migrated by duplex DNA standards of known length were measured and fit by a least-squares method to an exponential function. The apparent length of DNA in each gel band was then estimated using the derived function and the distance migrated. An equation of the form:
RL - 1 = (pL2 - q)(relative curvature)2 1
was fit by a least-squares method to data for a standard DNA duplex (duplex 21 in Fig. 2) containing one intrinsically-curved A6 tract per 21 bp (relative curvature = 0.5 A6 tract equivalents per helical turn) and no methylphosphonate substitutions (40). RL is the ratio of the apparent DNA length to the actual DNA length (L) for each band in the experimental ligation ladder. Best fits for the values of the constants, p and q, were then determined for each gel using mobility data for this standard DNA duplex for the length range 120 < length < 190 (39). The resulting equation was then used to obtain estimates for unknown relative curvature values (A5-6 tract equivalents per helical turn of DNA) for duplexes containing A5 tracts and either unmodified or partially neutralized AP-1 sequences. The intrinsic DNA curvature due to the A5-6 tract is considered to be a vector of magnitude a, directed toward the minor groove in a reference frame shifted 0.5 bp 3[prime] from the center of the A5-6 tract (38). Estimates for the value of a in test duplexes were obtained by comparison of the electrophoretic behavior of their ligation products to those containing duplex 21 (Fig. 2). To estimate the degree of bending induced by charge neutralization, b, the direction of induced bending was assumed to be toward the center of the neutralized DNA surface, at radial angle [thetas] from the intrinsic A5-6 tract bend. This assumption is consistent with qualitative experimental results. Satisfactory fits of the bending data were obtained by considering the degree of induced bending toward the neutralized surface to be:
b = kn 2
where n is the number of neutralized phosphates, and k gives the induced relative curvature per neutralized phosphate. The single best value of k was estimated by individual fits to bending data for each phasing, where the measured (net) relative curvature, c, is related to the intrinsic A5-6 tract curvature (a) and the induced bend (b) according to:
c = [a2 + b2 - 2abcos(180 - [thetas])]0.5 3

The appropriate apparent value of a (in relative curvature units) was used for each phasing to account for the presence of a small additional intrinsic curvature within the AP-1 site. Determination of b from equation 3 thus deconvolutes the apparent net DNA curvature (c) into components due to the intrinsic curvature of the A5 tract (a) and the unknown bending due to charge neutralization (b). Multiplication by a factor of 36 converts the units of a, b and c to degrees of DNA bending, and converts the units of k to degrees of DNA bending per neutralized phosphate.


Figure 2. Synthetic DNA duplexes used in this study. Circles to the right of each duplex depict end-views. Duplexes 1-6 were used to establish the helical repeat of DNA containing the AP-1 site (black rectangle) in unmodified form (duplexes 1-3) or bearing two methylphosphonate substitutions (black dots adjacent to sequences and in end views; duplexes 4-6). In duplexes 1-6, the center of the AP-1 site (small white square within sequence; open oval in end view) is on approximately the same helical face as the intrinsic bend due to the A5 tract (vertical arrowhead in end view). The remaining duplexes are organized in groups of three phasings between the A5 tracts and AP-1 sites (see end views). Duplexes 7, 5, 12, 15 and 18 are described as having a cis phasing relationship (A5 tract and center of AP-1 site separated by ~34° in a counterclockwise direction). Duplexes 8, 10, 13, 16 and 19 have an ortho phasing (AP-1 site rotated clockwise by ~68° relative to cis), and duplexes 9, 11, 14, 17 and 20 have a trans phasing (AP-1 site rotated clockwise by ~137° relative to cis). Duplexes 7-9 (0 + 0 = 0 case) are unmodified. Duplexes 5-11 (1 + 1 = 2 case) have two neutralized phosphates (one on each strand). Duplexes 12-14 (0 + 3 = 3 case; three neutralized phosphates on bottom strand) and duplexes 15-17 (1 + 2 = 3 case; one neutralized phosphate on top strand and two neutralized phosphates on bottom strand) all have a total of three neutralized phosphates. Duplexes 18-12 (1 + 3 = 4 case; one neutralized phosphate on top strand and three neutralized phosphates on bottom strand) have a total of four neutralized phosphates. Duplex 21 is an unmodified A6 tract standard.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Experimental design

Comparative electrophoresis experiments allow estimation of the magnitude and direction of DNA bends induced by sequence, structure and/or chemical modifications (20,38,40). In this approach, DNA duplexes comprising two turns of the double helix are chemically synthesized with cohesive molecular termini for unidirectional ligation in the presence of T4 DNA ligase. Each DNA duplex contains an A5-6 tract that is intrinsically curved by ~18° in an orientation that has been established (38). Because the A5-6 tracts in the resulting ligated multimers are aligned in a plane, multimers are increasingly curved, and show length-dependent mobility retardation in native polyacrylamide gels. Comparative electrophoresis is very sensitive to DNA shape because the electrophoretic anomaly is related to both the square of multimer length and the square of the relative curvature present in each of the ligated DNA duplexes (see equation 1 in Materials and Methods; 38).

In order to study the effects of phosphate neutralization within the AP-1 site, 21 DNA duplexes were synthesized (Fig. 2). Duplexes 1-3 and 7-9 are unmodified, containing AP-1 sites and A5 tracts in various positions. Duplex 21 is a well-studied mobility standard containing a single A6 tract in a GC-rich sequence context (40). The remaining duplexes contain two to four methylphosphonate substitutions within the AP-1 site, in positions simulating DNA sites thought to be in close contact with cationic amino acid side chains in Jun/Fos or GCN4 mutants that bend DNA toward the minor groove (26,33-35,41).

The comparative electrophoresis technique measures overall DNA curvature as a function of the phasing between a site of uncharacterized DNA deformation (the partially-neutralized AP-1 site) and a reference bend provided by an A5-6 tract. When favorably phased, the two helix deformations will add constructively to enhance the overall curvature of the duplex and decrease electrophoretic mobility. In unfavorable phasings, the two elements of curvature will tend to cancel and the electrophoretic mobility will increase. Estimates of the direction and extent of DNA bending due to charge neutralization can be deduced from these experiments (20).

Helical repeat of DNA duplexes

Application of comparative electrophoresis requires determination of the length of DNA that best approximates an integral number of helical turns. This parameter was confirmed experimentally using DNA duplexes 1-6 (Fig. 2), containing the AP-1 site in unmodified form (duplexes 1-3) or bearing two methylphosphonate substitutions (duplexes 4-6). Duplexes 1 and 4 are 20 bp in length, duplexes 2 and 5 are 21 bp in length and duplexes 3 and 6 are 22 bp in length. When ligated into multimers, the duplexes that display the greatest electrophoretic anomaly in which consecutive A5-6 tracts are most nearly phased.

Electrophoretic mobilities of duplexes 1-6 were determined relative to standards of known length. The electrophoretic anomaly, RL (the ratio of apparent length to actual length), is plotted against actual length in Figure 3. These results show that the helical repeat of the test DNA duplexes containing AP-1 sites is exactly 10.5 bp/turn (Fig. 3A), and that this parameter is not altered by a small number of methylphosphonate substitutions (Fig. 3B). Similar results have been obtained in previous studies (20). Based on this data, 21 bp DNA duplexes 7-20 (Fig. 2) were used in all subsequent phasing experiments.


Figure 3. Determination of helical repeat for DNA duplexes containing AP-1 sites. (A) The helical repeat of unmodified duplexes was estimated from plots relating the relative curvatures of ligation ladders of duplexes 1 (20mers, l), 2 (21mers, [squ]) and 3 (22mers, [cir]) to their actual lengths. (B) The helical repeat of duplexes with two phosphate neutralizations was estimated from similar plots relating the relative curvature of ligation ladders of duplexes 4 (20mers, l), 5 (21mers, [squ]) and 6 (22mers, [cir]) to their actual lengths. Inset panels show parabolic fits to RL data for actual DNA lengths near 210 bp as described in Materials and Methods.


Intrinsic DNA curvature within the AP-1 site

Before assaying AP-1 site bending due to phosphate neutralization, we measured the shapes of unmodified DNA duplexes containing A5 tracts at different distances from an unmodified AP-1 site (unmodified duplexes 7-9 in Fig. 2). In duplex 7 (defined as the `cis' case), the radial angle between the direction of A5 tract curvature and the center of AP-1 site is ~34° in a counterclockwise direction. In duplex 8 (the `ortho' case), the AP-1 site is rotated clockwise by ~68° relative to cis, and in duplex 9 (the `trans' case), the AP-1 site is rotated clockwise by ~137° relative to cis. If the only source of DNA curvature is the A5 tract, these three duplexes should appear equally curved. However, as shown in Figure 4 (lanes 4, 7 and 9), and in Figure 5A and F, these three duplexes did not comigrate. Figure 5F shows that duplexes 7 and 9 (cis and trans phasings) were equally curved, while duplex 8 (the ortho phasing) was somewhat less curved. In addition, although each of the three duplexes contained one A5 tract, apparent curvature was less than for the unmodified standard duplex 21 lacking an AP-1 sequence.


Figure 4. Electrophoretic phasing analysis of DNA shape. Example autoradiograph shows native polyacrylamide gel separation of ligated ladders produced from the indicated 21 bp DNA duplexes (schematic end views shown at top). Radiolabeled 100 bp ladder markers (lengths shown at left) were loaded in lanes 3, 8, 13 and 18 (indicated by M at top). Mobilities of 189 bp species are indicated by dots for comparison. DNA ligase was withheld from samples in lanes 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 15 and 16.


Figure 5. Quantitation of phasing data. (A)-(E) Relationship of the electrophoretic mobility anomaly (RL) to the actual length. The indicated sums reflect the contributions of phosphate neutralizations on the top and bottom DNA strands (respectively) to the total number of neutralizations in the duplex. (F)-(J) Relating RL- 1 to the square of the actual DNA length over a specified range (39), and show least squares fits to equation 1 (Materials and Methods). In each panel the behavior of unmodified A6 tract standard duplex 21 (l) is compared with the behavior of duplexes with cis ([squ]), ortho ([diams]) and trans (×) phasings. The duplex identification number (see Fig. 2) is indicated to the right of each curve.

These data suggest the presence of intrinsic curvature within the AP-1 site that explains the phase-dependent differences in net DNA curvature for unmodified duplexes 7-9. The intrinsic AP-1 site curvature is most completely opposed to the A5 tract bend in the ortho phasing. The symmetry of the curvature data further suggests that the intrinsic AP-1 site curvature counteracts the A5 tract bends of cis and trans duplexes equally, and to a lesser extent than in the ortho case. A simple quantitative model was devised to account for these data. In this model, the A5 tracts in duplexes 7-9 each induce an identical curvature of ~16° (within 10% of the conventional value; 42) in the expected direction. In addition, the model includes a second intrinsic curvature of ~4° within the AP-1 site, directed toward the major groove of DNA in a reference frame ~1 bp 5[prime] of the center of the AP-1 site (see summary depiction in Fig. 7). The different phasings of these two elements of curvature accounts for the different mobilities of duplexes 7-9.

A small AP-1 site curvature of approximately this magnitude (3-8°) and direction has previously been detected in several kinds of electrophoretic phasing analyses (26,33,35,43). The curvature of the AP-1 site toward the major groove near the center of the site would tend to slightly narrow the major groove in the direction of the leucine zipper of an incoming GCN4 homodimer (e.g. see Fig. 1A). It remains possible that the locus of slight intrinsic curvature lies just outside the AP-1 site.

DNA bending by phosphate neutralization within the AP-1 site

Having obtained estimates for the intrinsic shapes of unmodified phasing probes bearing the AP-1 site, we constructed four sets of partially-neutralized duplexes bearing methylphosphonate substitutions at various patterns of phosphates within the AP-1 site (duplexes 5-20 in Fig. 2). Duplexes 5, 10 and 11 represent three phasings of a partially-neutralized AP-1 site bearing one neutralized phosphate on each strand (1 + 1 = 2 case) with neutralizations placed in the sugar-phosphate backbones flanking the minor groove opposite the leucine zipper in an approaching GCN4 dimer (Fig. 1C). This placement is intended to mimic the positions of potential salt bridges between cationic amino acid side chains of GCN4 mutants bound to the AP-1 site (35). Duplexes 12-14, 15-17 and 18-20 correspond to 0 + 3 = 3,1 + 2 = 3 and 1 + 3 = 4 neutralization patterns, respectively (Fig. 2).

An example of electrophoretic data is shown in Figure 4 for the 1 + 1 = 2 case. Partial neutralization of the AP-1 site alters the overall shape of the modified duplexes (Fig. 4, compare lanes 12, 14 and 17). Neutralization on approximately the same DNA face as the intrinsic A5 tract curvature enhances overall bending (Fig. 4, compare lanes 12 and 14 with lanes 4 and 7). As the neutralized face is phased away from the A5 tract bend, overall bending is reduced (Fig. 4, lane 17).

Similar bending data were collected for the 0 + 3 = 3, 1 + 2 = 3 and 1 + 3 = 4 cases. The entire data set is depicted graphically in Figure 5. Figure 5B-E shows the electrophoretic anomaly of increasingly neutralized AP-1 sites as a function of the length of the ligated species. Figure 5F-J shows the data replotted as RL - 1 versus the square of the DNA length. Also shown in Figure 5F-J are fits of equation 1 (Materials and Methods), used to estimate the net curvature of DNA duplexes in which multiple elements of curvature are interacting. Deduced net curvatures are presented in Table 1. The data demonstrate that AP-1 site bending induced by partial neutralization is directed toward the neutralized face, as expected, and increases with increasing phosphate neutralization (compare Fig. 5F-J). Importantly, data for DNA duplexes with both 0 + 3 = 3 and 1 + 2 = 3 arrangements of three neutralizations are comparable, differing by only 6, 9 and 20% in cis, ortho and trans cases, respectively (Fig. 5H and I; Table 1). This result suggests that the precise pattern of neutralizations is not a major determinant of DNA shape.

Complete analysis of the DNA bending data requires consideration of (i) the A5 tract curvature, (ii) the intrinsic curvature present in the AP-1 site and (iii) the DNA bend induced by partial phosphate neutralization. The measured net curvature for each phasing was taken to be the independent combination of these bends. Analysis was performed by considering the vector sum of projections of each DNA segment on a plane normal to the initial DNA path. For small bend angles, these projections are roughly proportional to the angles themselves. The phasing data were analyzed using equations 2 and 3 (Materials and Methods).

Table 1. Relative curvature values for AP-1 duplexes
Neutralization patterna Phasingb
  cis ortho trans
0 + 0 = 0 0.41 0.33 0.41
1 + 1 = 2 0.60 0.54 0.35
0 + 3 = 3 0.67 0.60 0.42
1 + 2 = 3 0.71 0.67 0.33
1 + 3 = 4 0.79 0.67 0.42
aThe total number of neutralized phosphates within the AP‐1 site of each 21 bp duplex is shown as the sum of neutralizations on the top strand and bottom strand, respectively (see Fig. 2).
bData are shown as the relative curvature (A5-6 tract equivalents per helical turn), deduced from Figure 5F-J. The data measure overall DNA curvature due to both intrinsic and induced bends, and reflect the mean value derived from two experiments. Standard deviations are <5% of reported values.

Using this procedure, a model was obtained wherein the extent of DNA bending induced by electrostatic effects is a linear function of the number of neutralized phosphates. In this model, each neutralized phosphate contributes ~3.5° of DNA bending toward the neutralized surface. As shown in Figure 6, this model accounts well for the electrophoretic data. The manner in which net curvatures are decomposed into individual components is shown graphically in Figure 7.

It is interesting to note that the estimate of ~3.5° of induced DNA bending per neutralized phosphate is also in excellent agreement with earlier studies of an unrelated DNA sequence, wherein six phosphate neutralizations flanking the minor groove induced ~21° of bending (20). These data also compare favorably with the observed effect of neutralizing two phosphates flanking the minor groove at the center of the CRE sequence in duplex DNA, where the modifications at least partially reversed an intrinsic curvature of 11-13° toward the major groove (34). Results of another study comparing AT-rich versus GC-rich sequence contexts tend to support this unexpected notion that bending by phosphate neutralization is relatively independent of DNA sequence (44).

Alternative explanations

The application of a DNA analog to mimic electrostatic effects raises the concern that the analog itself induces changes in DNA structure through non-electrostatic effects (45,46). We have previously performed four kinds of experiments to address these concerns. First, DNA bending by methylphosphonate-substituted DNA was performed in the presence of different oligovalent cations (20). Non-electrostatic effects on DNA shape would not be expected to depend on counterion valence. DNA bending due to asymmetric phosphate neutralization should be highly sensitive to the residual charge per phosphate, a parameter influenced by counterion valence (47). The observation that DNA bending relaxes in the presence of oligocations is evidence for an inherent electrostatic effect in these studies. Second, we have shown that multiple methylphosphonate substitutions do not alter the helical repeat parameter for duplex DNA (20). Third, we have simulated asymmetric phosphate neutralization using unrelated DNA analogs in which the phosphate backbone is not altered, but additional cations were tethered to bases on one DNA face (23,24). The qualitative agreement of DNA bending in these studies supports an electrostatic effect. Fourth, in an attempt to limit non-electrostatic contributions to DNA shape, we have compared DNA bending after partially substituting only the favorable RP methylphosphonate stereoisomer rather than racemic mixtures (21). Similar DNA bending results were obtained, suggesting that effects of methylphosphonate chirality impact bending estimates by <30%. Although it is impossible to eliminate the possibility that some portion of the DNA deformation in these studies is due to non-electrostatic consequences of methylphosphonate substitution, the results summarized above support an electrostatic interpretation of the present data.


Figure 6. DNA bending induced by phosphate neutralization within the AP-1 site. Measured net curvature values (relative curvatures reflecting combined effects of A5 tracts, the intrinsic shape of the AP-1 site, and bending induced by phosphate neutralization) are plotted as a function of the number of neutralized phosphates for the cis (l), ortho (n) and trans ([cir]) phasings of the AP-1 site relative to the A5 tract. Solid lines give the best fits of the data to relative curvature predictions based on the model shown in Figure 7.


Figure 7. Interpretation of bending model. Circles represent views along the axis of the initial DNA path for a 21 bp duplex, rotated such that the A5 tract curvature is directed upwards in each case. Gray patches indicate the helical face at the center of the AP-1 sequence. Vectors represent projections of end-to-end distance vectors for DNA duplexes if only the indicated element of curvature were present. Vectors A, I and B depict the magnitudes and directions of DNA bending due to the A5 tract, intrinsic curvature of the AP-1 sequence, and induced curvature due to electrostatic effects, respectively. The magnitude of vector B depends on the number of phosphates neutralized according to equation 2. This model was obtained in four steps. First, data for unmodified DNA duplexes were used to deduce the approximate direction of the intrinsic DNA curvature (vector I) based on the observation that the order of relative curvatures were cis [ap] trans > ortho. Second, having estimated the angles between vectors A and I for each duplex, equation 3 was then used to obtain best fits for the magnitudes of A and I. Third, a virtual vector, A[prime], was calculated, where A[prime]= A + I. The net magnitude and direction of intrinsic curvature for each DNA molecule is thus described by A[prime]. Fourth, using estimates for the angles between vectors A[prime]and B, relative curvature data were fit to equations 2 and 3 to derive the 3.5° estimate for the value of k in equation 2. This analysis assumes that the electrophoretic anomaly is proportional to the square of the sum of vector components perpendicular to the initial DNA path, where the magnitudes and directions of A and I are known, and the direction of B was taken to be toward the neutralized surface of the DNA. This model also assumes that the individual elements of curvature within the DNA duplex contribute independently to its final shape.


Comparing bZIP and `phantom' proteins

Studies of bZIP proteins such as Jun homodimers, Fos/Jun heterodimers (28,29,31), CRE-BP1 homodimers (26), GCN4 homodimers (26,35,48), mutants of these proteins (26,33-26), and other bZIP family members (30) suggest that they modify the shape of the AP-1 site in different ways. It must be noted that studies involving DNA bending by Fos/Jun remain controversial because of debate over interpretation of electrophoretic phasing experiments (49-51).

Recent studies with recombinant variants of Fos/Jun (33) and GCN4 (35,36) containing different numbers of charged amino acids near the basic region support the hypothesis that the shape of the AP-1 site responds to electrostatic features of the protein (Fig. 1). It remains possible, however, that the electrophoretic effects observed for these differently-charged protein variants arise from changes in DNA rigidity or some other property of the protein-DNA complex (49). The results of the present study support an interpretation involving DNA bending.

It is interesting to compare apparent bending of the AP-1 site induced by the binding of a series of increasingly cationic GCN4 variants (36) with DNA bending observed in the present study as a result of partial phosphate charge neutralization. This comparison is presented in Figure 8. Considering both the crude manner in which methylphosphonate substitution mimics interactions between cationic amino acid side chains of GCN4 and DNA phosphates, and differences between the two kinds of electrophoretic phasing experiments, the agreement between the two bending studies is notable. As shown in Figure 8, both studies suggest a similar shape for the unbound AP-1 site. Bend magnitudes and directions upon increasing asymmetric phosphate neutralization are also comparable. The slope of a linear fit through the previous DNA bending data for GCN4 complexes is the same (3.5° per neutralized phosphate) as predicted by the bending model derived from the current studies with methylphosphonates (Fig. 8). We interpret this striking quantitative agreement between experiments involving `real' and `phantom' proteins as evidence that DNA bending explains the electrophoretic phasing data obtained with GCN4 mutants (35,36), and that asymmetric phosphate charge neutralization causes DNA bending in these complexes.


Figure 8. Comparison of DNA bending by bZIP and `phantom' proteins. The apparent DNA bend angle within the AP-1 site is shown for complexes involving GCN4 mutants bearing different numbers of cationic amino acids [l; data from ref. 36], or as observed in the present work for actual phosphate neutralizations ([squ]). Positive values of apparent DNA bend angle refer to bending toward the major groove (i.e. toward the leucine zipper). Line indicates the predicted relationship between phosphate neutralizations and bending of the AP-1 site based on the present model (3.5° of bending is induced toward the minor groove for each neutralized phosphate).

These bending data can also be compared with previous studies of DNA bending upon binding of PU.1 protein (17,52). Partial neutralization of the PU.1 DNA binding site by methylphosphonate substitution was used to mimic salt bridges observed on one face of the DNA helix within the PU.1-DNA complex (22). In that study, asymmetric phosphate neutralization resulted in DNA bending (28°) that was more than sufficient to account for the DNA curvature observed in the co-crystal (8°).

CONCLUSION

The AP-1 site in duplex DNA appears to bend in response to the pattern of amino acid charges distal to the basic region in bound bZIP proteins. The extent and direction of apparent DNA bending are consistent with the prediction that DNA will collapse locally upon asymmetric phosphate charge neutralization. The present experiments partially substitute AP-1 phosphates with various numbers of neutral methylphosphonate linkages. The degree of DNA bending induced by methylphosphonate substitution (~3.5° per neutralized phosphate) is comparable to that induced by GCN4 variants carrying increasing numbers of additional basic amino acids. It is therefore plausible that asymmetric phosphate charge neutralization is the basis for DNA bending in such complexes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank M.Doerge in the Mayo Foundation Molecular Biology Core Facilities for providing excellent oligonucleotide synthesis services. Supported by the Mayo Foundation and NIH grants GM47814 and GM54411 to L.J.M, a summer undergraduate research fellowship from the Dr Scholl Foundation to L.A.T., and a University of Nebraska Medical Center Regents Fellowship to J.K.S.-S. L.J.M. is a Harold W. Siebens Research Scholar.

REFERENCES

1. Cantor, C.R. and Schimmel, P.R. (1980) Biophysical Chemistry Part III: The Behavior of Biological Macromolecules. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.

2. Kahn, J.D. and Crothers, D.M. (1993) Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Vol. LVIII, pp. 115-122.

3. Luger, K., Mader, A.W., Richmond, R.K., Sargent, D.F. and Richmond, T.J. (1997) Nature, 389, 251-260. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Goodman, S.D. and Nash, H.A. (1989) Nature, 341, 251-254. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Giese, K., Kingsley, C., Kirshner, J.R. and Grosschedl, R. (1995) Genes Dev., 9, 995-1008. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Ptashne, M. and Gann, A. (1997) Nature, 386, 569-577. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Kim, J.L., Nikilov, D.B. and Burley, S.K. (1993) Nature, 365, 520-527. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Kim, Y., Greiger, J.H., Hahn, S. and Sigler, P.B. (1993) Nature, 365, 512-520. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Pontiggia, A., Rimini, R., Harley, V.R., Goodfellow, P.N., Lovell-Badge, R. and Bianchi, M.E. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 6115-6124. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Werner, M.H. and Burley, S.K. (1997) Cell, 88, 733-736. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Crothers, D.M. (1993) Curr. Biol., 3, 675-676.

12. Werner, M.H., Gronenborn, A.M. and Clore, G.M. (1996) Science, 271, 778-784. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Elcock, A.H. and McCammon, J.A. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 3787-3788.

14. Rice, P.A., Yang, S.W., Mizuuchi, K. and Nash, H.A. (1996) Cell, 87, 1295-1306. MEDLINE Abstract

15. Pellegrini, L., Tan, S. and Richmond, T.J. (1995) Nature, 376, 490-498. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Li, T., Stark, M.R., Johnson, A.D. and Wolberger, C. (1995) Science, 270, 262-269. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Kodandapani, R., Pio, F., Ni, C.-Z., Piccialli, G., Klemsz, M., McKercher, S., Maki, R.A. and Ely, K.R. (1996) Nature, 380, 456-460. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Mirzabekov, A.D. and Rich, A. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76, 1118-1121. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Manning, G., Ebralidse, K.K., Mirzabekov, A.D. and Rich, A. (1989) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 6, 877-889. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Strauss, J.K. and Maher, L.J. (1994) Science, 266, 1829-1834. MEDLINE Abstract

21. Strauss-Soukup, J.K. and Maher, L.J. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 8692-8698. MEDLINE Abstract

22. Strauss-Soukup, J.K. and Maher, L.J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem., 272, 31570-31575. MEDLINE Abstract

23. Strauss, J.K., Roberts, C., Nelson, M.G., Switzer, C. and Maher, L.J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 9515-9520. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Strauss, J.K., Prakash, T.P., Roberts, C., Switzer, C. and Maher, L.J. (1996) Chem. Biol., 3, 671-678. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Glover, J.N.M. and Harrison, S.C. (1995) Nature, 373, 257-261. MEDLINE Abstract

26. Paolella, D.N., Palmer, C.R. and Schepartz, A. (1994) Science, 264, 1130-1133. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Ellenberger, T.E., Brandl, C.J., Struhl, K. and Harrison, S.C. (1992) Cell, 71, 1223-1237. MEDLINE Abstract

28. Kerppola, T.K. and Curran, T. (1991) Science, 254, 1210-1214. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Kerppola, T.K. and Curran, T. (1991) Cell, 66, 317-326. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Kerppola, T.K. and Curran, T. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 5479-5489. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Kerppola, T.K. (1994) In Conaway, R.C. and Conaway, J.W. (eds), Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation. Raven Press, Ltd, NY, pp. 387-424.

32. Konig, P. and Richmond, T.J. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 233, 139-154. MEDLINE Abstract

33. Leonard, D.A., Rajaram, N. and Kerppola, T.K. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 4913-4918. MEDLINE Abstract

34. Paolella, D.N., Liu, Y. and Schepartz, A. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 10033-10038. MEDLINE Abstract

35. Strauss-Soukup, J.K. and Maher, L.J. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 10026-10032. MEDLINE Abstract

36. Strauss-Soukup, J.K. and Maher, L.J. (1998) Biochemistry, 37, 1060-1066. MEDLINE Abstract

37. Hogrefe, R.I., Vaghefi, M.M., Reynolds, M.A., Young, K.M. and Arnold, L.J. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 2031-2038. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Crothers, D.M. and Drak, J. (1992) Methods Enzymol., 212, 46-71. MEDLINE Abstract

39. Koo, H.-S. and Crothers, D.M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1763-1767. MEDLINE Abstract

40. Rice, J.A. and Crothers, D.M. (1989) Biochemistry, 28, 4512-4516. MEDLINE Abstract

41. Metallo, S.J., Paolella, D.N. and Schepartz, A. (1997) Nucleic Acid Res., 25, 2967-2972. MEDLINE Abstract

42. Haran, T.E., Kahn, J.D. and Crothers, D.M. (1994) J. Mol. Biol., 244, 135-143.

43. Rajaram, N. and Kerppola, T.K. (1997) EMBO J., 16, 2917-2925. MEDLINE Abstract

44. Strauss-Soukup, J.K., Rodrigues, P.D. and Maher, L.J. (1998) Biophys. Chem., in press.

45. Bower, M., Summers, M.F., Powell, C., Shinozuka, K., Regan, J.B., Zon, G. and Wilson, W.D. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 4915-4930. MEDLINE Abstract

46. Reynolds, M.A., Hogrefe, R.I., Jaeger, J.A., Schwartz, D.A., Riley, T.A., Marvin, W.B., Daily, W.J., Vaghefi, M.M., Beck, T.A., Knowles, S.K., Klem, R.E. and Arnold Jr, L.J. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 4584-4591. MEDLINE Abstract

47. Manning, G.S. (1978) Q. Rev. Biophys., 11, 179-246. MEDLINE Abstract

48. Gartenberg, M.R., Ampe, C., Steitz, T.A. and Crothers, D.M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 6034-6038. MEDLINE Abstract

49. Sitlani, A. and Crothers, D.M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3248-3252. MEDLINE Abstract

50. Kerppola, T.K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 10117-10122. MEDLINE Abstract

51. Hagerman, P.J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 9993-9996. MEDLINE Abstract

52. Pio, F., Kodandapani, R., Ni, C.-Z., Shepard, W., Klemsz, M., McKercher, S., Maki, R.A. and Ely, K.R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271, 23329-23337 MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 507 284 9041; Fax: +1 507 284 2053; Email: maher@mayo.edu
+Present address: Department of Molecular Biophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208114, 260 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520-8114, USA


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 13 May 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. J. McDonald, J. D. Kahn, and L. J. Maher III
DNA bending by bHLH charge variants
Nucleic Acids Res., October 18, 2006; 34(17): 4846 - 4856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Range, E. Mayaan, L. J. Maher III, and D. M. York
The contribution of phosphate-phosphate repulsions to the free energy of DNA bending
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2005; 33(4): 1257 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Reynolds, E. Peterson, G. Quievryn, and A. Zhitkovich
Human Nucleotide Excision Repair Efficiently Removes Chromium-DNA Phosphate Adducts and Protects Cells against Chromate Toxicity
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30419 - 30424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. R. Hardwidge, J. M. Zimmerman, and L. J. Maher III
Charge neutralization and DNA bending by the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2002; 30(9): 1879 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. R. Hardwidge, J. M. Zimmerman, and L. J. Maher, III
Design and calibration of a semi-synthetic DNA phasing assay
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2000; 28(23): e102 - e102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (167K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J., 3rd
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?