Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (257K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 3486-3493  


The Z[alpha] domain from human ADAR1 binds to the Z-DNA conformer of many different sequences
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   DNA
   Protein expression constructs
   Bandshift assays
   Plasmid shift assay
   Circular dichroism (CD)
   Atomic force microscopy (AFM)
Results
   Requirements for high affinity binding by Z[alpha]
   Sequence specificity of Z[alpha]
   AFM results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


The Z[alpha] domain from human ADAR1 binds to the Z-DNA conformer of many different sequences

The Z[alpha] domain from human ADAR1 binds to the Z-DNA conformer of many different sequences

Alan Herbert*, Markus Schade, Ky Lowenhaupt, Jens Alfken1, Thomas Schwartz, Luda S.Shlyakhtenko2,3, Yuri L. Lyubchenko2, Alexander Rich

Department of Biology Room 68-233, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, 1Centrum Somatische Gentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, 2Department of Microbiology, Arizona State University, Box 872701, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and3BioForce Laboratory, Inc., 112 Robin Hill Road, Santa Barbara, CA 03117, USA

Received April 23, 1998; Revised and Accepted June 17, 1998

ABSTRACT

Z-DNA, the left-handed conformer of DNA, is stabilized by the negative supercoiling generated during the movement of an RNA polymerase through a gene. Recently, we have shown that the editing enzyme ADAR1 (double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase, type 1) has two Z-DNA binding motifs, Z[alpha] and Z[beta], the function of which is currently unknown. Here we show that a peptide containing the Z[alpha] motif binds with high affinity to Z-DNA as a dimer, that the binding site is no larger than 6 bp and that the Z[alpha] domain can flip a range of sequences, including d(TA)3, into the Z-DNAconformation. Evidence is also presented to show that Z[alpha] and Z[beta] interact to form a functional DNA binding site. Studies with atomic force microscopy reveal that binding of Z[alpha] to supercoiled plasmids is associated with relaxation of the plasmid. Pronounced kinking of DNA is observed, and appears to be induced by binding of Z[alpha]. The results reported here support a model where the Z-DNA binding motifs target ADAR1 to regions of negative supercoiling in actively transcribing genes. In this situation, binding by Z[alpha] would be dependent upon the local level of negative superhelicity rather than the presence of any particular sequence.

INTRODUCTION

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase (ADAR1) belongs to a family of enzymes that act on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to deaminate adenosine and produce inosine (1). Since inosine is translated as guanosine, the informational content of the RNA is changed. This process can lead to the site-specific substitution of one amino acid for another, altering the functional properties of a protein. Examples of this type of RNA editing have been shown to affect the ion conductance of kainate- and AMPA-type glutamate receptors, the cGMP response of the serotonin HT2C receptor, and the catalytic properties, as well as the intracellular localization, of [alpha]2,6-sialyltransferase (2-6).

Adenosine to inosine (A to I) editing is found to be ubiquitous in metazoa and is present in most, if not all, tissues (7). The minimal requirement for the reaction is a dsRNA substrate. Currently no consensus sequence is apparent in the RNAs edited by this reaction, suggesting either that each ADAR enzyme edits only a subset of substrates, or that the editing reaction is not solely regulated by RNA binding preference (8). The former possibility is supported by the site-specific nature of modifications found in physiological substrates (2-6). The later alternative is supported by the rather promiscuous nature of ADAR1 and ADAR2 editing in vitro, where any dsRNA substrate longer than 30 bp is readily modified (9). A similar promiscuity also occurs in vivo, resulting in hypermutation of viruses (10).

The ADAR family of enzymes often use dsRNA editing substrates that incorporate introns. Sequences within introns, called exon complementary sites (ECS), basepair to exons and guide editing (11). ECS have been defined for glutamate and serotonin HT2C receptors (4,5,11-13). The involvement of introns requires that editing occurs before splicing, or that splicing be delayed until editing has occurred. Since many regions capable of forming dsRNA exist in pre-mRNA, the action of ADAR enzymes must be tightly regulated.

The recent demonstration that ADAR1 has two Z-DNA binding motifs suggests one way in which the activity of this enzyme may be targeted (14). Z-DNA is a higher energy conformer of DNA that is left-handed, but can be formed by isomerization from B-DNA under conditions of negative superhelicity (15,16). The ease with which a particular DNA segment forms Z-DNA depends on its sequence, and can be accurately quantitated using in vitro techniques (17). Sequences of alternating d(CG) flip easily, while runs of d(TA) and sequences without purine-pyrimidine repeats form Z-DNA more poorly. In vivo, negative supercoiling can be generated by the passage of a transcribing RNA polymerase through a gene (18). Although the level of negative supercoiling is constrained by topoisomerases and by other proteins that unwind DNA, it has been demonstrated that the formation of Z-DNA occurs inside cells during transcription (19). Experiments using agarose-embedded permeabilized nuclei also demonstrate the transcription-dependent formation of Z-DNA (20,21). Sequences that switch between B- and Z-DNA conformations can thus act as an indicator of the transcriptional state of a gene. It is thus possible that ADAR1 is selectively targeted to nascent RNAs through its Z-DNA binding motifs (22). A role for Z-DNA in the direct regulation of the deaminase domain is unlikely as in vitro assays are not affected by the inclusion of Z-DNA in incubation buffers (14). Also, mutants that lack the Z[alpha] and Z[beta] are active in these assays (10).

In order to further understand the sequence specificity of Z[alpha], studies were performed using bandshift assays to examine the binding of this motif to different B-form and Z-form sequences. Our conclusion is that a peptide containing the Z[alpha] motif is specific for the Z-DNA conformation rather than for a particular sequence. This assertion is verified by using atomic force microscopy to demonstrate multiple binding sites in supercoiled plasmids which lack canonical Z-DNA forming sequences. These results suggest that the targeting of ADAR1 to a gene is most likely to occur when levels of negative supercoiling are sufficient to initiate Z-DNA formation, and is less likely to be dependent on the affinity of ADAR1 for a particular sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA

Synthetic deoxynucleotides were obtained from Life Technologies. Plasmids pDPL6 (2.2 kb) and its derivative pDHg16 containing a d(CG)13 insert have been previously described (23,24).

Protein expression constructs

Two series of constructs were used. The first was based on the pGEX-5x1 GST fusion system, and required cleavage with factor Xa to release Z[alpha] peptides (14). This system was used to prepare (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta] constructs, using a G4TG4SG4S flexible linker to join the two motifs. The other system used pET-28a vectors with a His-tag that was removed using thrombin, and was used to express residues 122-200 of Z[alpha], as well as the C125S mutant, which was made using the QuiKChange kit from Stratagene. Proteins were made in Escherichia coli strain Novablue and purified using either glutathione agarose (Pharmacia) or TALON metal affinity resin (Clontech) following the manufacturer's instructions. Z[alpha] peptides made from His-tag constructs were additionally purified using MonoS (Pharmacia) ion-exchange chromatography run in 50 mM HEPES, (pH 7.4) and eluted with NaCl.

Bandshift assays

These were performed using a partially brominated probe as previously described (14) or using 32P-labeled deoxyoligonucleotides that had been gel purified on a 20% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. When these latter probes were used, magnesium was omitted from the buffer used during incubation with Z[alpha]-related peptides, and 0.5 mM EDTA used instead. Electrophoresis was performed at 7.5 V/cm rather than 12 V/cm as with the longer probe.

Plasmid shift assay

DNA and protein were mixed together in a final volume of 12 µl, using 70 ng of plasmid and the indicated concentration of Z[alpha]. Complexes were resolved in a 1% agarose gel buffered with 0.5× TBE and run at 6 V/cm for 3 h. Gels were then stained with ethidium bromide and photographed.

Circular dichroism (CD)

Spectra were collected on a Aviv 60DS CD spectrometer as described previously (14) using the conditions given in the figure legends.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM)

AFM was performed using functionalized aminopropyl mica (AP-mica) as a substrate for the sample preparation (25 and references therein). Aliquots of 10 µl of the DNA (0.5 µg/ml) in TE buffer plus 100 mM of NaCl were placed onto pieces of AP-mica for 2 min, rinsed with deionized water and argon-dried. Images were taken in air with NanoScope III instrument (Digital Instruments, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) operating in tapping mode. NanoProbe TESP probes (Digital Instruments, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) and conical sharp silicon tips (K-tek International, Portland, OR) were used for imaging in air. The typical tapping frequency was 240-280 kHz; scanning rate was 2-3 Hz.

RESULTS

We have previously described a bandshift assay that uses a partially brominated DNA oligonucleotide of alternating d(CG) that flips into the Z-DNA conformation under physiological conditions when 10 mM Mg2+ is present (24). This assay allows biological tissues to be tested for the presence of Z-DNA binding activities (26), and led directly to the discovery that ADAR1 is a Z-DNA binding protein (27). The assay was used to map the two Z-DNA binding motifs of ADAR1, Z[alpha] and Z[beta] (14). Here we further characterize the Z[alpha] motif and examine its sequence specificity.

Requirements for high affinity binding by Z[alpha]

A number of DNA binding proteins are known to bind with high affinity to DNA only as multimers (e.g. 28). In order to assess whether this was also true for peptides containing Z[alpha], a construct was made that used a 15 amino acid flexible linker to join Z[alpha] to a second Z[alpha]. Z[alpha] was also linked to Z[beta] to test for interaction between these two sub-domains of ADAR1. The constructs are referred to as (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta] respectively. They were tested in a bandshift assay as shown in Figure 1 where a titration of Z[alpha] is compared to those of (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta]. As can be seen, each construct produces multiple bandshifts, showing that the partially brominated DNA probe is capable of binding many molecules of protein. The multiple bands produced allowed the stochiometry of binding of each construct to be directly compared. Both Z[alpha] and (Z[alpha])2 produce bands that migrate with approximately the same mobility (Fig. 1A), suggesting that Z[alpha] binds to the probe in multiples of two to form a z[alpha]z[alpha] binding site. The slight difference in mobility between these two constructs can be accounted for by the presence of the flexible linker in (Z[alpha])2. A different result is obtained when the bandshift produced by (Z[alpha])2 (Fig. 1B, lanes 1-3) is compared with that produced by Z[alpha]Z[beta] (Fig. 1C, lanes 1-3). With Z[alpha]Z[beta] only every second band is seen. This result suggests that Z[alpha]Z[beta] binds the probe in multiples of two, not as a monomer. One interpretation of the difference between (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta] is that it is necessary for the Z[alpha] subunits of Z[alpha]Z[beta] peptides to dimerize in order to form a functional binding unit (z[alpha]z[alpha]). This would imply that the binding properties of (Z[alpha])2 and the Z[alpha]Z[beta] dimer should be very similar. To examine this prediction, competition assays were performed with each construct. Unlabeled B-form and Z-form DNA competitor were used. Loss of bandshifting ability in the presence of a particular competitor indicates that the protein binds specifically to this DNA conformation. The results of the competition assay for each construct are also shown in Figure 1. For both (Z[alpha])2 (Fig. 1B) and Z[alpha]Z[beta] (Fig. 1C), competition is observed with a Z-DNA competitor (lanes 4-6), but not with a B-DNA competitor (lanes 1-3). This result shows that both these constructs bind specifically to Z-DNA. However, (Z[alpha])2 is competed efficiently by unlabeled Z-form competitor (Fig. 1B, lanes 4-6) whereas the Z[alpha]Z[beta] dimer is not (Fig. 1C, lanes 4-6). This result is obtained even though (Z[alpha])2 is more efficient at producing a bandshift than Z[alpha]Z[beta], as evidenced by the much darker bands observed in Figure 1B compared to Figure 1C. Thus the binding specificity of the constructs is in fact different. Such a difference could arise because the two Z[beta] subunits join to form a separate binding site (z[beta]z[beta]), changing the binding preference of the complex. However, if the Z[alpha]Z[beta] dimer also contained a z[alpha]z[alpha] binding site, the bandshift produced would be expected to be the sum of the two sites, and at least as strong as that produced by (Z[alpha])2. Instead a significantly weaker signal is seen, making this explanation unlikely. Alternatively, a binding site with novel properties (z[alpha]z[beta]) could be formed by combining a Z[alpha] subunit with a Z[beta] subunit. This explanation leaves unanswered the question of why formation of a z[alpha]z[beta] binding site requires two Z[alpha]Z[beta] molecules rather than just one.


Figure 1. Z-DNA bandshifts using Z[alpha], (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta] constructs showing binding to a partially brominated d(CG)33-35 oligonucleotide (24). Protein-DNA complexes were preformed by mixing the indicated amount of protein with 100 pg of 32P-labeled probe in a reaction mix containing 1 µg of sheared salmon sperm DNA, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). Complexes were resolved on a 6% PAGE gel. Free probe migrates at the bottom of the gel, and a number of discrete bandshifts are observed, indicating that the probe has multiple binding sites. All constructs were prepared by factor Xa digests of GST fusion proteins (14). (A) Titrations were performed using 5-fold dilutions of Z[alpha] (lanes 1-4) and 10-fold dilutions of (Z[alpha])2 (lanes 5-8), starting with 10 ng of protein in lanes 4 and 8. (B) Competition experiments performed with (Z[alpha])2 using 5-fold dilutions of unlabeled B-form poly d(CG) (lanes 1-3) or the same polymer stabilized in the Z-DNA conformation by chemical bromination (24) (lanes 4-6). Lanes 3 and 6 contain 35 ng of competitor. In lane 0, there is no additional competitor added. (C) Competition experiments performed using Z[alpha]Z[beta] as detailed in (B). The competition experiments shown in (B) and (C) were performed on the same gel and have equivalent exposure time. They confirm that these constructs are Z-DNA specific, and the binding sites formed by (Z[alpha])2 and (Z[alpha]Z[beta]) differ in character.

Further evidence for the requirement that Z[alpha] binds DNA as a dimer was developed using a more defined probe consisting of a d[(CG)3 T3(CG)3] hairpin [referred to as d(CG)3 hairpin to indicate the composition of the hairpin stem]. In solution, this probe adopts the B-DNA conformation. It was reasoned that if the energy of binding of Z[alpha] was sufficiently high, the interaction of Z[alpha] could stabilize this sequence in the Z-DNA conformation. As shown in Figure 2 (lanes 1-5), Z[alpha] is indeed able to bandshift the d(CG)3 hairpin probe. Only a single bandshift is observed, indicating that the DNA has a single binding site for the protein, and that Z[alpha] has a single binding site for DNA. In Figure 2, the titration of Z[alpha] (lanes 1-5) is compared to a Z[alpha] mutant [Z[alpha](C125S)] that has cysteine (residue 125 of human ADAR1) changed to serine (lanes 6-10). Also, a bandshift performed with Z[alpha] in the presence of 100 mM of the reducing agent 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) is shown (lanes 11-15). Substitution of serine for cysteine causes loss of bandshifting activity under the conditions used here. Furthermore, 2-ME reduces binding by Z[alpha] considerably, suggesting that stabilization of the dimer needed for binding requires a disulfide bond. Even in the presence of 2-ME, residual bandshifting activity remains, implying that disulfide bond formation may occur rapidly once the Z[alpha]-probe complex enters the gel and before DNA and protein are electrophoretically separated.


Figure 2. Bandshift assay of Z[alpha], Z[alpha](C125S) and Z[alpha] plus 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol using a d[(CG)3T3(CG)3] hairpin probe. Protein was diluted in 5-fold dilution steps, starting at 5 µM, and was incubated in the absence of any added competitor in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA (pH 7.4) with 32P-labeled probe in a final volume of 12 µl. Complexes were resolved on a 6% non-denaturing PAGE gel. Free probe migrates at the bottom of the gel. The probe has only a single protein binding site, and the Z[alpha] dimer only binds one probe molecule.

Collectively the results presented in Figures 1 and 2 suggest that high affinity binding requires two Z[alpha] subunits, and that formation of a dimer by two Z[alpha] monomers is stabilized in the construct used here by disulfide bond formation. When (Z[alpha])2 constructs, in which two Z[alpha] monomers are joined by a flexible linker rather than a disulfide bond, were examined using a BIAcore machine to measure on- and off-rates of binding to a preformed Z-DNA substrate, it was found that the dissociation rate was much slower than for reduced Z[alpha] molecules which had a similar affinity to the serine mutant (data not shown). This slower off-rate may account for the more robust bandshift behavior of wildtype Z[alpha] compared to the serine mutant. It should be noted that native ADAR1 (27), which we purified under reducing conditions, closely resembles the bandshifting behavior of the wildtype Z[alpha] construct used here, suggesting that it too has a slow off-rate when bound to Z-DNA.

Sequence specificity of Z[alpha]

In addition to the d(CG)3 hairpin probe described above, other hairpin sequences were also tested for bandshift activity, including those with d(CA)3 and d(TA)3 stems (only the upper strand sequence is given). These probes did not result in measurable bandshifts. Although such results could indicate that Z[alpha] lacked specificity for these sequences, another possibility was that there was not enough of these sequences in the Z-DNA conformation (due to the high energetic cost of initiating Z-DNA formation) to produce a bandshift. In order to examine this explanation, a series of probes 12 bp in length, which have two Z[alpha] binding sites, were made and tested in a band shift assay. One binding site was always d(CG)3 while the sequence of the other was varied. It was reasoned that binding of Z[alpha] to the first site would help force the second site into the Z-DNA conformation, as the energetic cost of forming Z-DNA with short sequences is similar to that of maintaining a B-Z junction (4 kcal/mol) if the oligomer were half B- and half Z-DNA. Therefore this approach allows the affinity of Z[alpha] for the second site to be measured. The results obtained with this assay are shown in Figure 3. Z[alpha] is titrated in 2-fold dilutions against four different DNAs (lane 10 has the highest concentration of Z[alpha]). In panel B, a hairpin with a d[(CG)3(CG)3] stem (only the top strand sequence is given) is used. The presence of two discrete bands at higher concentrations of Z[alpha] confirms that there are two binding sites for Z[alpha] on this probe. In panel A, a probe with a d[(TA)3(CG)3] stem is used, and shows that at the highest concentrations, Z[alpha] will bind to the d(TA)3 site. More robust binding to the second binding site is observed with a d[(CA)3d(CG)3] stem, (panel C) and a d[(TG)3d(CG)3] stem (panel D). Under these conditions, bandshifting of probes consisting entirely of d(CA)6 or d(TG)6 stems was very weak and only the upper band was detected (data not shown). The difference in the concentration of Z[alpha] required to bind to second sites is of interest as it could represent a true difference in sequence specificity. However, the difference observed could instead just reflect the relative energetic cost of flipping the second site into the Z-DNA conformation. In this case, the free energy cost of converting the second site to Z-DNA should be proportional to the logarithm of Z[alpha] concentration. The data in Figure 3, which is generated using 2-fold dilutions of Z[alpha] can be converted to a log2 scale by numbering each dilution 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. starting at lane 10 and moving leftwards. The ratio of the log2[Z[alpha]] to bind the second d(CG)3 site relative to d(CA)3 relative to d(TA)3 is thus 1:2:4. This result is consistent with the relative energy cost of stabilizing the various sequences in the Z-DNA conformation previously measured using supercoiled plasmids (17). The energetic penalty of maintaining d(CG)3 as Z-DNA given in (17) is 1.98 kcal/mol, d(CA)3 is 4.02 kcal/mol, and d(TA)3 is 7.2 kcal/mol, giving an approximate relative cost of 1:2:4. Thus, differences in apparent sequence specificity can be explained largely by the energetic cost to flip these bases into the Z-DNA conformation. These results suggest that Z[alpha] is conformation-specific rather than sequence-specific. This conclusion is further supported by noting that the amount of Z[alpha] required to form the lower bandshift is less when the 5[prime] residue is cytosine (Fig. 3B and C) rather than thymine (Fig. 3A and D). Published data showing that the cost of flipping a CG dinucleotide into the Z-DNA conformation is lower than for flipping a TG dinucleotide (29). As a consequence, more of the cytosine-containing probes are in the Z-DNA conformation, and thus more is available for binding by Z[alpha]. Bandshifts are thus formed at lower concentrations of Z[alpha].


Figure 3. Bandshift assays of Z[alpha] using probes with two binding sites. Protein was incubated in the absence of any added competitor in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 25 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA (pH 7.4) with 5 nM 32P-labeled probe in a final volume of 12 µl. Complexes were resolved on a 6% non-denaturing PAGE gel. Free probe migrates at the bottom of the gel. Bandshifts were performed using the following hairpins with a dT3 loop (A) d[(TA)3(CG)3T3(CG)3(TA)3], (B) d[(CG)3-(CG)3T3(CG)3(CG)3], (C) d[(CA)3(CG)3T3(CG)3(TG)3], (D) d[(TG)3(CG)3-T3(CG)3(CA)3]. Titrations are performed in 2-fold dilution steps starting with the highest concentration of Z[alpha] (1.2 µM) in lane 10.

It is of interest that the d(TA)3 can be flipped to Z-DNA by Z[alpha] under physiological conditions. This transition has been seen previously using 5 M NaCl and transition metals (30). The transition from B- to Z- DNA can be followed by CD (31). An example of the changes that occur is shown in Figure 4A. In these experiments the d[(CG)3(CG)3] hairpin probe was used. The B-DNA spectrum (dotted line) has a trough at 250 nm and a peak at 275 nm. In contrast, the Z-DNA spectrum (dashed line) formed in the presence of 4 M NaCl has lost the negative peak present at 250 nm and has a new trough at 294 nm. A similar transition occurs in the presence of Z[alpha] without any additional salt (solid line), confirming that Z[alpha] stabilizes the Z-DNA conformer of this oligonucleotide under physiological conditions. The same experiment was performed using the d[(TA)3(CG)3] hairpin probe to determine whether Z[alpha] causes this probe to flip partially or fully into the Z-DNA conformation (Fig. 4B). With this oligonucleotide, 4 M NaCl fails to convert the DNA into the Z-DNA conformation (dashed line). The changes observed in the spectrum are similar to those observed with sequences designed to form B-Z junctions under high salt conditions, suggesting that the d(CG)3 site may have undergone some conformational change while the d(TA)3 site remains in the B-DNA conformation (32). When Z[alpha] is incubated with d[(TA)3(CG)3] stem hairpin, there is a full inversion of the spectrum to the Z-DNA type (solid line), indicating that Z[alpha] has stabilized the d(TA)3 segment as Z-DNA. This finding confirms the results obtained by bandshifting this oligonucleotide. Taken together, these result show that Z[alpha] stabilizes d(TA)3 in the Z-DNA conformation by binding to the DNA.


Figure 4. CD titration of Z[alpha] complexed to DNA hairpins with two binding sites. The DNA hairpins d[(CG)6T3(CG)6] (A) and d[(TA)3(CG)3T3(CG)3(TA)3] (B) were titrated with Z[alpha] peptide in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA (pH 7.4) at 30°C in an Aviv 60DS spectrometer. Spectra obtained using a ratio of 1 mol of Z[alpha] to 2 mol of basepairs are shown (solid lines). Reference spectra obtained in the absence of protein (dotted line) and in 4 M NaCl (dashed line) are also shown. In 4 M salt hairpins d[(CG)6T3d(CG)6] forms Z-DNA, while d[(TA)3(CG)3T3(CG)3(TA)3] undergoes only a partial transition (32) However, Z[alpha] can stabilize d(TA)3 in the Z-DNA conformation as shown by the solid line in (B). The CD signal produced Z[alpha] alone is equivalent to baseline in the region of 250-300 nm, but becomes strongly negative below 240 nm.

AFM results

The effect of Z[alpha] on DNA was examined by AFM using supercoiled plasmids. AFM allows the visualization of structures at nanometer-range resolution (33-35), and has been greatly improved by the use of functionalized mica surfaces (AP-mica; 25,36-39). AP-mica has aminopropyl groups on the surface allowing the attachment of DNA to this surface via electrostatic interaction between anionic DNA polymer and cationic AP-mica surface. Previous work has shown the elegance of this method for studying plasmid topology (25). It has been recently demonstrated that structure and dynamics of supercoil-stabilized cruciforms can be studied by AFM (40). As shown in Figure 5, these methods can be used to view the B-Z DNA transition in supercoiled plasmids. Plate A shows a parental plasmid (pDLP6) of 2.2 kb, and plate B shows a derivative (pDHg16) containing a d(CG)13 insert that forms Z-DNA at bacterial superhelical density (23). Samples were prepared in TE buffer plus 100 mM NaCl and deposited onto AP-mica, rinsed dried and imaged in air with AFM operated in tapping mode. Both types of DNA molecules are plectonemic superhelices, but the pDHg16 has fewer supercoils than the parental plasmid. The lower writhe confirms that the d(CG)13 insert retains its Z-DNA conformation after the deposition onto AP-mica. The number of nodes for both samples was measured; the mean number of nodes for pDLP6 were 7.2 $ 1.2 and 5.4 $ 1.0 for pDHg16. The average difference of 1.8 is less than expected for a complete B to Z transition of the d(CG)13 insert (flipping each turn of B-DNA into Z-DNA would change the writhe by ~2), and probably indicates that the plasmid population contains a range of topoisomers. In addition, different plasmid topologies are in equilibrium with each other, so that at any one time, it would not be expected that all plasmids form Z-DNA in the d(CG)13 insert.


Figure 5. AFM of supercoiled pDLP6 (A) and its derivative pDHg16 (23) (B), at bacterial superhelical density. The presence of the d(CG)13 insert in pDHg16 causes a loss of writhe. Plasmids were prepared in TE buffer plus 100 mM NaCl and deposited onto AP-mica. Inserts in each panel are enlarged images of the same samples (rescans over the smaller area). The bar size in the inserts is 100 nm.

The AFM method is also well suited for examining conformational changes caused by binding of proteins (34,35,39). It was therefore of interest to examine the effects of Z[alpha] on supercoiled DNA. First, concentrations of Z[alpha] and plasmid were titrated for use in AFM studies. The binding of Z[alpha] to plasmid was evaluated using non-denaturing agarose electrophoresis in the absence of ethidium bromide (Fig. 6) to measure the effects of Z[alpha] on plasmid mobility. Stabilization of Z-DNA by Z[alpha] results in loss of writhe in the plasmid due to the reversal of DNA twist in left-handed regions. The loss of writhe results in slower electro-phoretic migration of the plasmid. As a consequence, a plasmid-shift relative to control plasmid is observed. The specificity of this shift for supercoiled plasmid is demonstrated by comparing the mobility of the supercoiled plasmid in the presence of protein to that of nicked circular DNA. In Figure 6, the effect of Z[alpha] is shown on both pDPL6 (panel A) and pDHg16 (panel B). For both samples, the concentration of Z[alpha] is such that in lane 3 the mobility of the supercoiled plasmid (S) is reduced (compared to the control without protein in lane 0), while that of the nicked circular plasmid (N) is not, indicating a specific interaction with supercoiled plasmid. At the higher concentration shown in lane 4, nicked circular DNA is also shifted. Z[alpha] is capable of inducing a plasmid shift of pDHg16 at a 25-fold lower concentration than the parental plasmid pDLP6, which lacks the d(CG)13 Z-DNA forming insert.


Figure 6. Plasmid shift assays of pDPL6 (A) and pDHg16 (B) in the presence of Z[alpha]. Plasmid (70 ng, 0.11 µM bp) at bacterial superhelical density was incubated with Z[alpha] in 12 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA (pH 7.4). Complexes were resolved on a 1% agarose gel run in TBE buffer, and then visualized with ethidium bromide. Lane 4 contains 2.3 µM Z[alpha]; lane 3, 0.46 µM; lane 2, 0.09 µM; and lane 1, 0.02 µM. Lane 0 contains no added protein. The positions of nicked circular (N) and supercoiled plasmids (S) are indicated. The experiments shown in (A) and (B) were performed at the same time using the same agarose gel.

The AFM data for pDHg16 complexed with Z[alpha] at different concentrations are shown in Figure 7. The concentrations of the peptide used corresponds to lane 3 (panel A) and lane 4 (panel B) of Figure 6. Z[alpha] causes unwinding of pDHg16 compared to naked DNA (Fig. 5B), consistent with the decrease in plasmid mobility seen in Figure 6. At the highest concentration of Z[alpha] there is a dramatic change in DNA supercoiling, showing that Z[alpha] decreases the winding number of the DNA. The mean number of nodes drops from 5.4 $ 1.1 for naked DNA (Fig. 5) to 3.2 $ 1.1 for the sample shown in Figure 7B. Another striking feature seen in Figure 7 is the change to the curvature of the DNA. Naked DNA follows a smooth path whereas DNA in the presence of Z[alpha] undergoes abrupt changes in path direction that we refer to as kinks. These kinks are seen clearly on zoomed images taken by scanning over smaller areas and are indicated by arrows in the insets of Figure 7. The kinks are often associated with bright blobs, which we call nodules. No such nodules are observed on bare DNA molecules (compare with the inset of Fig. 5B where the only areas of brightness seen occur in regions where two strands of DNA cross over each other). In addition, the number of nodules increases with protein concentration (compare insets in Fig. 7A and B). It is thus likely that the nodules are just regions of DNA bound by Z[alpha]. Similar nodules are seen in other AFM studies of protein-DNA complexes (39). Brighter nodules are likely to contain multimers of peptides. As the kinks in DNA are associated with nodules, it is likely that these kinks are induced by binding of Z[alpha] to DNA, indicating that Z[alpha] causes a localized deformation of DNA. The presence of nodules at multiple sites in the plasmid suggests that Z[alpha] can bind to many different sequences. This finding confirms the results obtained in the bandshift assays shown in Figure 3.


Figure 7. AFM of Z[alpha] bound to pDHg16, showing relaxation of supercoils and kinking of DNA induced by Z[alpha]. The concentrations of Z[alpha] and pDHg16 used in (A) are equivalent to those of lane 3 in Figure 6 while in (B) the same amounts as in lane 4 of Figure 6 were used. Inserts in each panel are enlarged images of the same samples (rescans over the small area). The bar size in the inserts is 100 nm. Abrupt changes in DNA path, referred to as kinks in the text, are apparent when these insets are compared to those of Figure 5B. Bright blobs that are associated with the kinks are highlighted by arrows. These blobs are referred to as nodules in the text and are likely to represent regions containing Z[alpha] bound to DNA.

DISCUSSION

The biological role of Z-DNA is unknown. The presence of Z-DNA binding motifs in ADAR1, an enzyme that acts on nascent RNAs to change their informational content, suggests that these motifs may play a role in regulating the editing process. One possibility is that the Z-DNA formed during transcription allows the enzyme to be targeted to particular sites within genes. In order to test this hypothesis, it is necessary to know the binding specificity of the ADAR1 Z-DNA binding motifs. If these motifs show strong sequence-specificity, then the search for genes that are edited by ADAR1 would be simplified, as only a limited subset of genes with those sequences would be candidates for editing. However, the results reported here suggest that the Z[alpha] motif is not sequence-specific, but rather conformation-specific. We have demonstrated that dimers of Z[alpha] flips not only d(CG) into the Z-conformer, but also d(TA), implying that Z[alpha] has only limited base specificity. The question of which sequences are bound by Z[alpha] in vivo thus becomes: what genes contain regions of localized negative superhelicity sufficient to flip a particular sequence into the Z-DNA conformation? We thus need to consider the possibility that non-canonical Z-DNA forming sequences may be of importance in the regulation of editing. In the appropriate context, these sequences may form Z-DNA and then bind ADAR1.

There are situations where inducibility of Z-DNA formation may be valuable in the regulation of ADAR1. For example, during development, the onset of editing of RNAs for glutamate receptors occurs much later than the onset of transcription (2), indicating that neither the presence of RNA nor the passage of the polymerase is sufficient for initiation of editing. In addition, messages, such as that of GluR-B, contain sites that are fully edited (Q/R site) and others (e.g. R/G site) that are only partially edited (4). This difference in editing efficiency suggests the importance of local factors in determining whether editing occurs within a gene. Z-DNA may be one of these factors.

Two general types of model for the control Z-DNA formation can be proposed. Both rely on the movement of an RNA polymerase through a gene to generate negative supercoiling (18). One relies on the inhibition of factors that actively remove supercoils (the minus model) and the other on the presence of factors that actively increase negative supercoiling (the plus model). In the minus model, release of torsional strain by topoisomerases is prevented, for example through phosphorylation, or restricted nuclear localization, allowing formation of Z-DNA. In the plus model, additional torsional strain is generated by the action of a second factor, for example, another polymerase. One candidate could be RNA polymerase III. RNA polymerase III transcriptional units are widespread throughout introns. They are ten times more frequent than RNA Pol II dependent genes and often produce RNAs with no known function. However, the act of transcription by RNA polymerase III would increase negative supercoiling of adjacent DNA regions and possibly flip surrounding DNA segments into the Z-DNA conformation. In the case of ADAR1, this mechanism would allow the timing and amount of editing to be regulated through changes in RNA polymerase III activity without altering transcription by RNA polymerase II.

The question remains of how Z[alpha] stabilizes Z-DNA. The results reported here suggest that the interaction does not require sequence-specific recognition, raising the possibility that Z[alpha] binds to the minor groove of Z-DNA. As with B-DNA, the minor groove of Z-DNA is information poor and does not allow good base discrimination (41). In addition, it is thought that differences in hydration of the minor groove may partially explain why d(CG)n forms Z-DNA better than poly d(TA)n (42). Interaction of Z[alpha] with the minor groove of Z-DNA may replace the need for water in stabilizing this conformation. The other possibility that Z[alpha] binds to a B-Z junction is not supported by the CD data, which show a complete inversion of the CD spectra. Formation of a B-Z junction would cause only a half transition.

The AFM studies are consistent with these general conclusions. This technique allows visualization of changes to plasmid topology caused by Z[alpha]. Relaxation of plasmid supercoils is observed, as would be expected by reversing the twist of DNA from right-handed to left-handed. In addition, a number of kinks are observed in the DNA (as indicated by arrows in the Fig. 7 insets) that appear to be associated with binding of Z[alpha] to DNA. Sequence analysis of the pDHg16 plasmid reveals that in addition to the d(CG)13 insert, there are at least four other potential Z-DNA forming sites (17), all of different base composition, consistent with the idea that Z[alpha] binds to the plasmid without any particular sequence specificity. Mapping of the binding sites in this plasmid using AFM is planned.

The nature of the kinks produced by binding of Z[alpha] in the plasmids is of interest. It has been proposed on both experimental and theoretical grounds that junctions between B- and Z-DNA are intrinsically bent (32,43), an interpretation favored by the evidence reported here.

The binding properties of Z[alpha] to Z-DNA closely resembles the binding of chicken lung ADAR1 to Z-DNA (27). When the original, partially brominated probe is used in the bandshift assay, both ADAR1 and Z[alpha] show slow kinetic off-rates. In this particular assay, the gel lacks the Mg2+ necessary to stabilize the probe in the Z-DNA conformation (24). The lack of Mg2+ requires that the protein remains bound to the probe during electrophoresis. Any probe released from the protein will return to the B-DNA conformation and thus be unavailable for rebinding, resulting in a loss of the bandshift. Both ADAR1 and Z[alpha] produce very stable bandshifts with no significant breakdown of the protein-probe complex, suggesting that both have slow off-rates from Z-DNA. Structurally related proteins that bind to Z-DNA, but have a fast off-rate are unlikely to be detected by the bandshift assays described here. They can of course be characterized using preformed Z-DNA substrates in BIAcore assays (14).

It is unlikely that the Z[alpha] exists in vivo as a disulfide linked dimer. The z[alpha]z[alpha] binding site could instead be formed by an association of two ADAR1 promoted by other sequences in the protein. Alternatively, Z[alpha] may combine with other partners to form a functional Z-DNA binding site. In ADAR1, Z[beta] may be used to form a z[alpha]z[beta] binding site, a possibility suggested by the results shown in Figure 1C. Other partners for Z[alpha] that have not yet been identified may also exist. The proposed partners may confer some sequence specificity on the binding of Z[alpha]. However these partners may only alter the kinetics with which Z-DNA is bound. For example, one interpretation of the differences between binding by (Z[alpha])2 and Z[alpha]Z[beta] shown in Figure 1C is that the Z[alpha]Z[beta] has a slower on rate (decreasing the amount of DNA bound) and a faster off-rate (decreasing the effectiveness of the unlabeled Z-DNA as a competitor).

Studies on B-DNA binding proteins have focused on sequence-specific recognition. In contrast, the strategy used by Z[alpha] seems to depend more upon the conformational properties of a particular sequence rather than on its precise base composition. Thus recognition of a sequence by Z[alpha] is context-specific, occurring only under energetic conditions that favor Z-DNA formation. Likewise, regulation of biological processes by Z[alpha], when it occurs, is also likely to be context-specific rather than sequence-specific.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the Office for Naval Research and the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

1. Bass,B.L., Nishikura,K., Keller,W., Seeburg,P.H., Emeson,R.B., O'Connell,M.A., Samuel,C.E. and Herbert,A. (1997) RNA, 3, 947-949. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Sommer,B., Kohler,M., Sprengel,R. and Seeburg,P.H. (1991) Cell, 67, 11-19. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Lomeli,H., Mosbacher,J., Melcher,T., Hoger,T., Geiger,J.R., Kuner,T., Monyer,H., Higuchi,M., Bach,A. and Seeburg,P.H. (1994) Science, 266, 1709-1713. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Kohler,M., Burnashev,N., Sakmann,B. and Seeburg,P.H. (1993) Neuron, 10, 491-500. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Burns,C.N., Chu,H., Rueter,S.M., Hutchinson,L.K., Canton,H., Sanders-Bush,E. and Emeson,R. (1997) Nature, 387, 303-308.

6. Ma,J., Qian,R., Rausa,F.M.,III and Colley,K.J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem., 272, 672-679. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Bass,B.L. (1993) In Gesteland,R.F. and Atkins,J.F. (eds), The RNA World. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY. pp. 383-418.

8. Smith,H.C., Scott,J.M. and Hanson,M. (1997) RNA, 3, 1105-1123. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Polson,A.G. and Bass,B.L. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 5701-5711. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Bass,B.L. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci., 22, 157-162. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Higuchi,M., Single,F.N., Kohler,M., Sommer,B., Sprengel,R. and Seeburg,P.H. (1993) Cell, 75, 1361-1370. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Egebjerg,J., Kukekov,V. and Heinemann,S.F. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 10270-10274. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Herb,A., Higuchi,M., Sprengel,R. and Seeburg,P.H. (1996)Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 1875-1880. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Herbert,A., Alfken,J., Kim,Y.-G., Mian,S., Nishikura,K. and Rich,A. (1997) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci, USA, 94, 8421-8426.

15. Klysik,J., Stirdivant,S.M., Larson,J.E., Hart,P.A. and Wells,R.D. (1981) Nature, 290, 672-677. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Peck,L.J., Nordheim,A., Rich,A. and Wang,J.C. (1982)Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 79, 4560-4564. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Ho,P.S., Ellison,M.J., Quigley,G.J. and Rich,A. (1986) EMBO J., 5, 2737-2744. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Liu,L.F. and Wang,J.C. (1987) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 7024-7027. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Rahmouni,A.R. and Wells,R.D. (1989) Science, 246, 358-363. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Wittig,B., Wolfl,S., Dorbic,T., Vahrson,W. and Rich,A. (1992) EMBO J., 11, 4653-4663. MEDLINE Abstract

21. Wolfl,S., Martinez,C., Rich,A. and Majzoub,J.A. (1996) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3664-3668. MEDLINE Abstract

22. Herbert,A. and Rich,A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271, 11595-11598. MEDLINE Abstract

23. Haniford,D.B. and Pulleyblank,D.E. (1983) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 1, 593-609. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Herbert,A.G. and Rich,A. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 2669-2672. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Lyubchenko,Y.L. and Shlyakhtenko,L.S. (1997) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 496-501. MEDLINE Abstract

26. Herbert,A.G., Spitzner,J.R., Lowenhaupt,K. and Rich,A. (1993)Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 3339-3342. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Herbert,A.G., Lowenhaupt,K., Spitzner,J.R. and Rich,A. (1995)Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 7550-7554.

28. Brennan,R.G. (1993) Cell, 74, 773-778. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Ellison,M.J., Kelleher,R.J.,III, Wang,A.H.-J., Habener,J.F. and Rich,A. (1985) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 8320-8324. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Ridoux,J.P., Liquier,J. and Taillandier,E. (1988) Biochemistry, 27, 3874-3878. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Pohl,F.M. and Jovin,T.M. (1972) J. Mol. Biol., 67, 375-396. MEDLINE Abstract

32. Liu,M., Guo,Q., Kallenbach,N.R. and Sheardy,R.D. (1992) Biochemistry, 1992, 4712-4719.

33. Binnig,G., Quate,C.F. and Gerber,C.H. (1986) Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 930-933.

34. Bustamante,C., Erie,D.A. and Keller,D. (1994) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 3, 750-760.

35. Hansma,H.G. and Hoh,J. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biochem. Struct., 23, 115-139.

36. Lyubchenko,Y.L., Gall,A.A., Shlyakhtenko,L.S., Harrington,R.E., Jacobs,B.L., Oden,P.I. and Lindsay,S.M. (1992) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 10, 589-606. MEDLINE Abstract

37. Lyubchenko,Y.L., Oden,P.I., Lampner,D. and Lindsay,S.M. (1993)Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 1117-1123. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Lyubchenko,Y.L., Shlyakhtenko,L.S., Harrington,R.E., Oden,P.I. and Lindsay,S.M. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 2137-2140.

39. Lyubchenko,Y.L., Jacobs,B.L., Lindsay,S.M. and Stasiak,A. (1995)Scan. Microsc., 9, 705-727.

40. Shlyakhtenko,L.S., Potaman,V.N., Sinden,R.R. and Lyubchenko,Y.L. (1998) J. Mol. Biol., 280, 61-72. MEDLINE Abstract

41. Seeman,N.C., Rosenberg,J.M. and Rich,A. (1976) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 804-808. MEDLINE Abstract

42. Wang,A.H.J., Hakoshima,T., van Der Marel,G., van Boom,J.H. and Rich,A. (1984) Cell, 37, 321-333.

43. Dai,Z., Dauchez,M., Thomas,G. and Peticolas,W. (1992)J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 9, 1155-1183. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 617 253 4704; Fax: +1 617 253 8699; Email: alan{at}mit.edu


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 20 Jul 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Li, J. Xiao, J. Li, L. Lu, S. Feng, and P. Droge
Human genomic Z-DNA segments probed by the Z{alpha} domain of ADAR1
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2009; 37(8): 2737 - 2746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. C. Champ, S. Maurice, J. M. Vargason, T. Camp, and P. S. Ho
Distributions of Z-DNA and nuclear factor I in human chromosome 22: a model for coupled transcriptional regulation
Nucleic Acids Res., December 14, 2004; 32(22): 6501 - 6510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. C. Ha, N. K. Lokanath, D. Van Quyen, C. A. Wu, K. Lowenhaupt, A. Rich, Y.-G. Kim, and K. K. Kim
A poxvirus protein forms a complex with left-handed Z-DNA: Crystal structure of a Yatapoxvirus Z{alpha} bound to DNA
PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(40): 14367 - 14372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Y. Lushnikov, B. A. Brown II, E. A. Oussatcheva, V. N. Potaman, R. R. Sinden, and Y. L. Lyubchenko
Interaction of the Z{alpha} domain of human ADAR1 with a negatively supercoiled plasmid visualized by atomic force microscopy
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2004; 32(15): 4704 - 4712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
Y. KLAUE, A. M. KALLMAN, M. BONIN, W. NELLEN, and M. OHMAN
Biochemical analysis and scanning force microscopy reveal productive and nonproductive ADAR2 binding to RNA substrates
RNA, July 1, 2003; 9(7): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Strehblow, M. Hallegger, and M. F. Jantsch
Nucleocytoplasmic Distribution of Human RNA-editing Enzyme ADAR1 Is Modulated by Double-stranded RNA-binding Domains, a Leucine-rich Export Signal, and a Putative Dimerization Domain
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2002; 13(11): 3822 - 3835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. S. Mattick and M. J. Gagen
Review ArticleThe Evolution of Controlled Multitasked Gene Networks: The Role of Introns and Other Noncoding RNAs in the Development of Complex Organisms
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2001; 18(9): 1611 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. R. Eckmann, A. Neunteufl, L. Pfaffstetter, and M. F. Jantsch
The Human But Not the Xenopus RNA-editing Enzyme ADAR1 Has an Atypical Nuclear Localization Signal and Displays the Characteristics of a Shuttling Protein
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2001; 12(7): 1911 - 1924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Schade, C. J. Turner, R. Kuhne, P. Schmieder, K. Lowenhaupt, A. Herbert, A. Rich, and H. Oschkinat
The solution structure of the Zalpha domain of the human RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 reveals a prepositioned binding surface for Z-DNA
PNAS, October 26, 1999; 96(22): 12465 - 12470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-G. Kim, K. Lowenhaupt, T. Schwartz, and A. Rich
The Interaction between Z-DNA and the Zab Domain of Double-stranded RNA Adenosine Deaminase Characterized Using Fusion Nucleases
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 1999; 274(27): 19081 - 19086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Schwartz, M. A. Rould, K. Lowenhaupt, A. Herbert, and A. Rich
Crystal Structure of the Z Domain of the Human Editing Enzyme ADAR1 Bound to Left-Handed Z-DNA
Science, June 11, 1999; 284(5421): 1841 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Schwartz, K. Lowenhaupt, Y.-G. Kim, L. Li, B. A. Brown II, A. Herbert, and A. Rich
Proteolytic Dissection of Zab, the Z-DNA-binding Domain of Human ADAR1
J. Biol. Chem., January 29, 1999; 274(5): 2899 - 2906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-G. Kim, K. Lowenhaupt, S. Maas, A. Herbert, T. Schwartz, and A. Rich
The Zab Domain of the Human RNA Editing Enzyme ADAR1 Recognizes Z-DNA When Surrounded by B-DNA
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2000; 275(35): 26828 - 26833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. A. Brown II, K. Lowenhaupt, C. M. Wilbert, E. B. Hanlon, and A. Rich
The Zalpha domain of the editing enzyme dsRNA adenosine deaminase binds left-handed Z-RNA as well as Z-DNA
PNAS, December 5, 2000; 97(25): 13532 - 13536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (257K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rich, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?