Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (181K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 3645-3650  


Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombeRad2 protein, a FEN-1 homolog
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   Strains and vectors
   Enzymes and chemicals
   Overexpression and purification of Rad2p
   Oligonucleotides
   Substrates
   Nuclease analysis
   Thrombin cleavage of GST-Rad2p
Results
   Expression and purification of S.pombe Rad2p
   GST-Rad2p processes DNA flap and pseudo-Y substrates
   GST-Rad2p displays 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity
   Thrombin cleavage
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombeRad2 protein, a FEN-1 homolog

Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombeRad2 protein, a FEN-1 homolog

Jeanne L. Alleva1,2 and Paul W. Doetsch1,3*

1Department of Biochemistry, 2Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology and 3Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30233, USA

Received May 22, 1998; Revised June 15, 1998; Accepted June 29, 1998

ABSTRACT

FEN-1 proteins are a family of nucleases essential for lagging strand DNA synthesis. A gene with sequence similarity to FEN-1 protein-encoding genes, rad2+, has been identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We report the overexpression, purification, and character-ization of the putative S.pombe FEN-1 homolog, Rad2p. A GST-Rad2p fusion protein was over-expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and purified to near homogeneity by GST affinity chromatography. Although Rad2p had been previously classified as a putative FEN-1 protein based on amino acid homology, there has been no biochemical evidence demonstrating flap endonuclease activity. DNA cleavage analysis of several different oligodeoxynucleotide structuresindicates that GST-Rad2p possesses both 5[prime]-flap endonuclease and 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exo-nuclease activities. GST-Rad2p incises a 5[prime]-flap and a 5[prime]-pseudo-Y structure one base 3[prime] of the branch point in the duplex region and also degrades double-stranded DNA. This is the first report on the biochemical characterization of S.pombe Rad2p. The potential roles of Rad2p in DNA excision repair and other nucleic acid reactions are discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Nucleases are an important class of enzymes that function in many types of nucleic acid reactions, including DNA replication, recombination and repair. The FEN-1 nucleases (five prime exonuclease or flap endonuclease) comprise the first major family of nucleases to be identified. Following the cloning of murine FEN-1 (1), homologs have been identified in a number of different species (2-7). Many of these were initially purified as exonucleases required for replication (3,4,8,9). Interestingly, several polymerases, including Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (pol I) and Taq DNA polymerase, have been shown to possess nuclease activities similar to the FEN-1 family (10,11).

FEN-1 homologs possess two distinct nuclease activities, an endonuclease activity that cleaves near the branch point of a 5[prime]-flap DNA structure (the exact location varying between species) and a 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity (1,7,11-13). The endonuclease also recognizes double flap DNA configurations that are proposed structures in DNA end joining reactions as well as pseudo-Y structures (1,7,13). The exonuclease activity hydrolyzes exposed 5[prime]-ends in gaps and nicks in duplex DNA as well as double-stranded blunt ends. A flap of the opposite polarity (3[prime]-flap), Holliday junctions, heterologous loops, DNA bubbles and hairpin structures are not recognized by this class of nucleases (reviewed in 14). In addition, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RPA) have been identified as enhancers of the FEN-1 endonuclease activity (15,16).

It has been determined that FEN-1 protein is necessary for completion of lagging strand replication (3,4,8,9). The biochemical function involves removal of Okazaki fragments by hydrolyzing the single ribonucleotide left following RNase H processing (17). It is also likely that FEN-1 protein functions as an endonuclease, independent of RNase H, recognizing a 5[prime] displaced DNA strand created by primer extension (17). Genetic analysis of FEN-1 mutations has led to several proposals for multiple cellular functions. In addition to increased UV sensitivity, further analysis of the null mutant of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of FEN-1, rad27, demonstrated sensitivity to methylmethanesulfonate (MMS), increased plasmid loss, increased spontaneous mutation level, increased mitotic recombination and a temperature-sensitive phenotype for growth (18,19). Some of these characteristics are also properties of E.coli DNA pol I mutants (polAex1) (20).

A putative FEN-1 homolog, rad2+, has been identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (6). The rad2-44 mutant cell line is temperature sensitive for growth and demonstrates increased sensitivity to UV irradiation, deficient UV damage repair and increased chromosome loss and/or non-disjunction (6,21). These phenotypes are consistent with possible roles in DNA replication, chromosome segregation and DNA repair. Epistasis analysis indicates a possible role for Rad2p in an excision repair pathway of UV light-induced DNA photoproducts that is distinct from nucleotide excision repair and is initiated by a protein termed UV damage endonuclease (UVDE) (22). Although genetic analysis has provided some information on potential cellular functions, the biochemical properties of Rad2p have not been previously described. Here we describe the overexpression, purification and characterization of a GST-Rad2p fusion protein from S.pombe. Biochemical analysis shows that GST-Rad2p possesses both a 5[prime]-flap DNA endonuclease activity as well as a 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity. GST-Rad2p cleaves a 5[prime]-pseudo-Y structure, but cannot process a 3[prime]-flap or a 3[prime]-pseudo-Y substrate. Genetic and biochemical analyses of other FEN-1 homologs, including initial analysis of the rad2-44 mutant in S.pombe, clearly demonstrate that this family of proteins is not only important for the completion of replication, but is also likely to have an important role in DNA repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and vectors

The E.coli strains INV[alpha]F[prime] and TOP10 were used for subcloning and propagation of plasmids. Saccharomyces cerevisiae DY150 (MATa ura3-53 leu2-3 112 trp1-1 ade2-1 his3-11 can1-100) was used for overexpression of Rad2p. The TA vector (pCR2.1) was purchased from Invitrogen and the pYEX4T-1 expression vector/system was purchased from Clonetech.

Enzymes and chemicals

All restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase and terminal transferase were purchased from Promega. Taq DNA polymerase was purchased from Fisher and T4 polynucleotide kinase was purchased from New England Biolabs. Thrombin protease and glutathione-Sepharose chromatography resin were purchased from Pharmacia. Bio-Rad protein reagent and the Silver Stain Plus kit were purchased from Bio-Rad. Reduced glutathione and SDS-PAGE protein molecular weight markers were purchased from Sigma. [[alpha]-32P]ddATP (3000 Ci/mmol) and [[gamma]-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Amersham. All other chemicals were of the highest grade commercially available.

Overexpression and purification of Rad2p

rad2+ was amplified by PCR from the [lambda]yes S.pombe cDNA library (ATCC) using the 5[prime] sense primer d(pGGGGATCCATGGGAATTAAAGGTT) and the 3[prime] antisense primer d(pGGGATCCTCAACGCTTTTTCTTGCT). The product was inserted into the pCR2.1 TA cloning vector. The rad2+ fragment was excised from the pCR2.1 vector and subcloned into the BamHI site of the pYEX4T-1 expression vector. The orientation of the insert was confirmed by cleavage with EcoRI. The rad2+ coding region was confirmed by sequence analysis and was identical to the previously reported sequence (6). The coding region was expressed with a GST leader sequence from the CUP1 promoter (23). Plasmids were transformed into S.cerevisiae DY150 and grown at 30°C on minimal medium plus adenine, histidine and tryptophan (YNB growth medium). In addition, uncut pYEX4T-1 was transformed as a control for protein induction, purification and activity analysis. Positive transformants were grown in YNB growth medium to mid log phase, resuspended in fresh medium and protein expression induced by addition of CuSO4 to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Cells were harvested after 3 h, washed and resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM NaCl, 200 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol and protease inhibitors). Equal volumes of glass beads were added and cells were lysed by eight 1 min vortex bursts with 5 min on ice between bursts. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 40 000 g and soluble protein was dialyzed overnight in buffer B (buffer A minus EDTA). Dialyzed lysates were centrifuged again and dialyzed overnight in buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 10 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol and 10% glycerol). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay using BSA as the standard (24). Crude lysates (150 mg) from GST-Rad2p overexpressing cells and vector-alone lysates were loaded onto a 2 ml glutathione-Sepharose column overnight at 0.1 ml/min. Columns were washed with 15 column volumes of 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.15 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (25). Proteins were eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM glutathione, 25 mM NaCl, 10 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol and 10% glycerol. Equal volumes of column fractions (1 µl) were analyzed for protein content on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (26).

Oligonucleotides

The following oligodeoxynucleotides were used in the construction of Rad2p substrates (Fig. 1), synthesized at the Emory University Microchemical Facility: oligo A, d(pGTCGACCTGCAGCCCAAGCTTGCGTTGCTG); oligo B, d(pATGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCAGGCTGCAGGTCGAC); oligo C, d(pCAGCAACGCAAGCTTG); oligo D, d(pCAGAACGCAAGCTTGCCTAGTCTGCGGATCGATC); oligo E, d(pGGCTGCAGGTCGAC); oligo F, d(pCATGCCTGCACGGAATTAAGCAATTCGTAAT); oligo G, d(pATTACGAATTGCTTAATTCGTGCAGGCATG).


Figure 1. Potential DNA substrates for Rad2p. All substrates were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. The asterisk indicates the position of the 32P label. Oligonucleotides that are labeled are underlined.

Substrates

Oligonucleotides were electrophoresed on a denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel, visualized by UV shadowing, eluted from the gel in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA) and ethanol precipitated. Oligos B and F were 3[prime]-end-labeled using terminal transferase and [[alpha]-32P]ddATP (27). Oligos B and D were 5[prime]-end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [[gamma]-32P]ATP (28). End-labeled oligonucleotides were annealed to the respective complementary strands in TE buffer plus 50 mM MgCl2 by heating to 70°C followed by slowly cooling to room temperature. Duplex DNA species were purified on a 20% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel, purified as described above, resuspended in TE buffer and stored at -20°C. Oligos A, B and C were annealed to create the 5[prime]-flap structure. Oligos A and B were annealed to create the 5[prime]-pseudo-Y structure. Oligos A, D and E were annealed to create the 3[prime]-flap. Oligos A and D were annealed to create the 3[prime]-pseudo-Y structure. Oligos F and G were annealed for the double-stranded template and oligo F was used as the single-stranded template.

Nuclease analysis

Endonuclease activity reactions were performed as follows. Protein (10 µg) was added to a reaction mixture containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 1 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol and 0.5 pmol end-labeled DNA substrate (100 µl final volume) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Reaction mixtures were extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and the DNA precipitated by ethanol precipitation. Labeled samples (5000-10 000 c.p.m.) were loaded onto a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and DNA strand scission products were visualized by autoradiography. In addition, Maxam-Gilbert base-specific chemical cleavage reaction products were run on the gel as nucleotide position markers (29). Exonuclease activity assays were carried out under similar conditions using 1.0 pmol end-labeled DNA substrate (120 min incubation time).

Thrombin cleavage of GST-Rad2p

The GST-Rad2p fusion protein (12 µg) was incubated for 24, 48 or 72 h at 4°C with 1-2 U thrombin (25). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (2 µg) and also tested for activity (10 µg) on the 3[prime]-end-labeled 5[prime]-flap substrate.

RESULTS

Expression and purification of S.pombe Rad2p

The rad2+ coding region was amplified by PCR, cloned into the pYEX4T-1 expression vector and transformed into S.cerevisiae DY150 for protein induction. Extracts prepared from cells induced for 3 h with CuSO4 were shown to contain a 69.5 kDa band as determined by SDS-PAGE. The GST-Rad2p fusion protein was purified to near homogeneity as shown by SDS-PAGE analysis of column fractions obtained by glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography (Fig. 2). The same procedure was carried out using an expression vector that contained only the GST protein, as a control for induction, purification, activity analysis and as a gauge for potential contaminating nucleases (data not shown).

GST-Rad2p processes DNA flap and pseudo-Y substrates

FEN-1 proteins cleave DNA near the branch site of a 5[prime]-flap overhang substrate by endonuclease activity. In order to determine if GST-Rad2p possessed such an endonuclease activity, a substrate was constructed which was similar to that used by Harrington et al. (1), containing a 5[prime]-end-labeled flap strand. Aliquots of glutathione-Sepharose fraction 2 (Fig. 2, lane 7) for both the GST-Rad2p fusion protein and GST alone were incubated with the end-labeled 5[prime]-flap substrate. As seen in Figure 3A (lane 3), GST-Rad2p specifically cleaves the flap-containing structure. The phosphodiester backbone is cleaved one base 3[prime] of the branch point in the duplex region of the substrate between two guanine residues. Based on the mobility of the cleavage product relative to size markers from base-specific chemical cleavage of the same DNA fragment, it is likely that the 3[prime]-terminus contains a hydroxyl group. Purified GST (expressed from GST vector alone and purified in parallel with GST-Rad2p) did not show this activity, indicating that incision is a property of GST-Rad2p. A very faint band observed in the purified GST reaction (lane 2) probably corresponds to trace contamination with S.cerevisiae nucleases. In addition, a variation of the 5[prime]-flap structure, the 5[prime]-pseudo-Y structure (Fig. 1) was tested as a substrate for the flap endonuclease activity. GST-Rad2p also cleaves the pseudo-Y substrate in the identical position to the 5[prime]-flap structure, but with lower efficiency (Fig. 3A, lane 5 compare with lane 3). GST-Rad2p shows no activity against similar substrates with opposite polarity (Fig. 1), such as 3[prime]-flap and 3[prime]-pseudo-Y structures (data not shown).


Figure 2. Purification of GST-Rad2p fusion protein. Crude lysate (150 mg) from cells overexpressing GST-Rad2p was loaded onto a 2 ml glutathione-Sepharose column. The column was washed and eluted as described in Materials and Methods. Aliquots from the crude, flow-through, washes and elution fractions were loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were visualized by silver staining. Lane 1, Bio-Rad high range molecular weight protein markers; lane 2, crude lysate (1 µg); lane 3, column flow-through (1 µg); lanes 4 and 5, column washes; lanes 6-15, glutathione elution fractions (1 µl). The arrow indicates GST-Rad2p fusion protein. Numbers on the left indicate the size of molecular weight standards (kDa).


Figure 3. Activity analysis of GST-Rad2p fusion protein. (A) Flap endonuclease activity. 5[prime]-End-labeled DNA substrates (0.5 pmol) were incubated with 10 µg GST alone, GST-Rad2p or no protein for 30 min at 37°C. Maxam-Gilbert base-specific chemical cleavage reaction products of the labeled DNA strand are indicated. 5[prime]-Flap substrate treated with: lane 1, no protein; lane 2, GST alone; lane 3, GST-Rad2p. 5[prime]-Pseudo-Y substrate treated with: lane 4, no protein; lane 5, GST-Rad2p; lane 6, GST alone. The sequence of the labeled strand is indicated on the left. The horizontal arrows on the right and left indicate the cleavage product and the nucleotide position of cleavage that corresponds to one base 3[prime] of the branch point in the duplex region (at the G-G site). The DNA cleavage product is the result of cleavage at the G-G site indicated by the vertical arrows in the substrate structures shown above the gel. (B) Duplex DNA exonuclease activity. 3[prime]-End-labeled double-stranded DNA (1.0 pmol) was incubated for 2 h at 37°C with either: lane 1, no protein; lane 2, GST alone; lane 3, GST-Rad2p. DNA strand scission products were separated on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography as described in Materials and Methods.

GST-Rad2p displays 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity

The end-labeled double-stranded DNA substrate (30mer) was incubated with GST-Rad2p and GST alone. Figure 3B shows electrophoretic separation of the DNA products. There is a distinct laddering of bands corresponding to multiple cleavage products for DNA treated with GST-Rad2p (lane 3) that is not observed for DNA treated with GST alone (lane 2). This demonstrates evidence of a 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded exonuclease associated with GST-Rad2p. Exonuclease activity of the same polarity was also observed when single-stranded DNA was treated with GST-Rad2p and GST alone (data not shown). Although the exonuclease activity of FEN-1 homologs is not known to hydrolyze single-stranded DNA, such an activity cannot be ruled out for GST-Rad2p based on these results.

Thrombin cleavage

In order to determine if the N-terminal tag was interfering with flap endonuclease cleavage, the GST tag was removed by thrombin cleavage. SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 4A) demonstrated the presence of two proteins following cleavage, corresponding to the predicted size of the GST protein (27 kDa) and the full-length Rad2p protein (42 kDa). Following incubation for 72 h at 4°C, thrombin cleavage of the fusion protein was nearly complete (lane 11). Activity analysis was carried out using aliquots of the thrombin cleavage reactions on a 3[prime]-end-labeled 5[prime]-flap substrate (Fig. 4B). Bands produced as a result of the putative single-stranded DNA exonuclease activity were observed migrating slower than the main cleavage product and were present in both the Rad2p (Fig. 4B) and GST alone digests (data not shown). Thrombin-cleaved Rad2p showed a significant decrease in flap endonuclease activity that could be correlated with the relative amounts of cleaved GST fusion protein (Fig. 4B, lanes 4, 7 and 10). Fully cleaved Rad2p had no detectable activity. The loss of activity was not due to the thrombin cleavage reaction conditions, as GST-Rad2p incubated without thrombin but in the presence of thrombin cleavage buffer demonstrated no decrease in flap endonuclease activity (Fig. 4B, lanes 2, 5 and 8). We currently do not know the reason for loss of activity following removal of the GST tag. We speculate that under the conditions of our experiments the GST tag may stabilize proper folding and maintenance of a structure compatible with activity of Rad2p.


Figure 4. Thrombin cleavage of GST-Rad2p. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of GST-Rad2p cleavage by thrombin protease. GST-Rad2p (12 µg) was incubated with 1-2 U thrombin at 4°C for specified time periods. Aliquots of 2.0 µg from each reaction were loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by Coomassie blue staining. Lane 1, Bio-Rad low range molecular weight PAGE standards; lane 2, untreated GST-Rad2p; lanes 3-5, GST-Rad2p treated for 24 h with 0, 1 or 2 U thrombin; lanes 6-8, GST-Rad2p treated for 48 h with 0, 1 or 2 U thrombin; lanes 9-11, GST-Rad2p treated for 72 h with 0, 1 or 2 U thrombin. Arrows on the right indicate cleavage products; the top and bottom bands represent Rad2p and the GST tag respectively. The numbers on the left indicate the size of the molecular weight standards (kDa). (B) Activity analysis of thrombin-cleaved Rad2p. An aliquot of 10 µg of the cleavage reactions shown in (A) was incubated with 0.5 pmol 5[prime]-flap substrate (3[prime]-end-labeled) for 30 min at 37°C. DNA strand scission products were analyzed as described in Figure 2A. Lane 1, untreated GST-Rad2p; lanes 2-4, treated GST-Rad2p (24 h); lanes 5-7, treated GST-Rad2p (48 h); lanes 8-10, treated GST-Rad2p (72 h). The sequence of the labeled strand is indicated on the right. Horizontal arrows on the left and right indicate the major cleavage product resulting from incision at the G-G site. The major cleavage site is also indicated in the substrate structure at the top of the gel.

DISCUSSION

This report provides an initial biochemical analysis of S.pombe Rad2p. The DNA cleavage patterns observed for GST-Rad2p are similar to the FEN-1 family of nucleases that are important for completion of lagging strand DNA replication (3,4,8,9). Genetic evidence has shown that mutations in the rad2 gene render a cell sensitive to UV irradiation and cells show an increased level of minichromosome loss (6). There has been no previous report, however, of the biochemical function of Rad2p.

GST-Rad2p possesses the flap endonuclease activity of FEN-1 proteins. Figure 2 demonstrates that DNA cleavage is specific for GST-Rad2p on both the 5[prime]-flap and 5[prime]-pseudo-Y DNA structures. Cleavage occurs one base 3[prime] of the branch point in the duplex region. Flap structures of the opposite polarity are not substrates for GST-Rad2p or other FEN-1 proteins (1,7). In addition, GST-Rad2p has 5[prime]->3[prime] double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity. Although it can be demonstrated that GST-Rad2p possesses FEN-1-type nuclease activities, we believe that the highly purified protein is relatively unstable. Early attempts to concentrate purified GST-Rad2p often resulted in formation of aggregates (data not shown). In addition, cleavage of the N-terminal GST tag results in rapid loss of flap endonuclease activity (Fig. 4B). As PCNA has been shown to enhance the DNA flap endonuclease activity of proteins similar to Rad2p, it is conceivable that similar additions to Rad2p cleavage reactions may increase activity and/or stability in our system.

In addition to the requirement for lagging strand DNA replication, there is a growing body of evidence that FEN-1 proteins are important in maintaining genomic integrity. Null mutations of the S.cerevisiae rad27 gene demonstrate an increase in microsatellite instability (30-33). It is possible that this phenotype is a result of secondary structure formation during replication. There is also evidence for a role of Rad2p in excision repair of UV photoproducts. A repair pathway, distinct from classic nucleotide excision repair, has been identified in S.pombe (21,34). The identification of an endonuclease (UVDE) that cleaves directly 5[prime] of the sites of UV photoproducts provides evidence that this `alternative' repair was through an excision repair pathway (35). Epistasis analysis with UVDE mutants and a rad2 deletion strain indicates that these proteins may be acting in the same repair pathway (22,36). Other proteins that may also be involved include rad18 and rhp51 (37). It is interesting to consider that the nuclease activity of Rad2p may be responsible for the excision of UV damage following cleavage by UVDE. Based on the available genetic and biochemical evidence involving the putative members of this repair pathway, several models have been proposed (Fig. 5). Bowman et al. (35) proposed a pathway that is similar to nucleotide excision repair in that following DNA cleavage by UVDE, the damage is excised, leaving a gap that is subsequently filled-in by polymerase and the nick sealed by ligase. Rad2p could act directly on the nicked structure left by UVDE through its exonuclease activity. An activity similar to this has been demonstrated for the human FEN-1 homolog DNase IV, which removes UV damage in short oligomers (38). It is also possible that repair proceeds in a manner similar to one branch of the base excision repair pathway which requires DNA polymerase [delta] (39). DNA polymerase may process the nicked structure first, in combination with other factors such as PCNA and RF-C, resulting in a displaced damaged strand. This would leave a 5[prime]-flap substrate that can be processed efficiently by Rad2p. Alternatively, as proteins involved in recombination have been implicated in this repair pathway, it is conceivable that any of the repair intermediates depicted in Figure 5 may be recombinogenic. Yonemasu et al. (22) have suggested that UVDE-mediated nicks are processed in at least two ways, one that is dependent on rad2 and one that is independent of rad2. It is possible that one or a combination of the above-mentioned processes may be responsible for the excision of UV photoproducts, in addition to nucleotide excision repair, in S.pombe. The availability of Rad2p in large quantities should facilitate biochemical studies of the UVDE-mediated alternative excision repair pathway as well as structural studies of FEN-1 type proteins.


Figure 5. Model for Rad2p in excision repair of UV light-induced DNA photoproducts. Excision repair is initiated by cleavage 5[prime] of a UV photoproduct (e.g. cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer) by UVDE. The product can subsequently be processed in at least two ways. Rad2p could remove the damage through exonuclease activity. This would leave a gap that could be filled-in by polymerase and sealed by ligase (pathway 1). Alternatively, the free end upstream of the dimer could undergo chain elongation by DNA polymerase, leaving a displaced flap structure. Rad2p could subsequently cleave the flap structure through endonuclease activity, leaving a nick to be sealed by ligase (pathway 2). The pathways depicted here show the minimum biochemical steps to achieve repair and do not show other accessory proteins (e.g. PCNA, RF-C, etc.) which may also be involved.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Julie M.Villanueva and Rebecca L.Swanson for critically reading this manuscript and members of the Doetsch laboratory for technical assistance and helpful discussions. This work was supported by Research Grant CA73041 from the National Cancer Institute. J.L.A. was supported by the NIH Predoctoral Training Program in Genetics (grant 5T32 GMO08490-05).

REFERENCES

1. Harrington,J.J. and Lieber,M.R. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 1235-1246. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Lindahl,T., Gally,J.A. and Edelman,G.M. (1969) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 62, 597-603. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Ishimi,Y., Claude,A., Bullock,P. and Hurwitz,J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem., 263, 19723-19733. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Turchi,J.J., Huang,L., Murante,R.S., Kim,Y. and Bambara,R.A. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 9803-9807. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Siegal,G., Turchi,J.J., Myers,T.W. and Bambara,R. (1992)Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 9377-9381. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Murray,J.M., Tavassoli,M., Al-Harithy,R., Sheldrick,K.S., Lehmann,A.R., Carr,A.M. and Watts,F.Z. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 4878-4888. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Kimura,S., Kai,M., Hobayashi,H., Suzuki,A., Morioka,H., Otsuka,E. and Sakaguchi,K. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 4970-4976. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Goulian,M., Richards,S.H., Heard,C.J. and Bigsby,B.M. (1990)J. Biol. Chem., 265, 18461-18471. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Waga,S. and Stillman,B. (1994) Nature, 369, 207-212. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Lundquist,R.C. and Olivera,B.M. (1982) Cell, 31, 53-60. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Lyamichev,V., Brown,M.A.D. and Dahlberg,J.E. (1993) Science, 260, 778-783. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Murante,R.S., Huang,L., Turchi,J.J. and Bambara,R.A. (1994)J. Biol. Chem., 269, 1191-1196. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Zhu,F.X., Biswas,E.E. and Biswas,S.B. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 5947-5954. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Lieber,M.R. (1996) BioEssays, 19, 233-240.

15. Wu,X., Li,J., Li,X., Hsieh,C.-L., Burgers,P.m.J. and Lieber,M.R. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 2036-2043. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Biswas,E.E., Zhu,F.X. and Biswas,S.B. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 5955-5962. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Murante,R.S., Rust,L. and Bambara,R.A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 30377-30383. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Sommers,C.H., Miller,E.J., Dujon,B., Prakash,S. and Prakash,L. (1995)J. Biol. Chem., 270, 4193-4196. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Reagan,M.S., Pittenger,C., Siede,W. and Friedberg,E.C. (1995)J. Bacteriol., 177, 364-371. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Konrad,E.B. and Lehman,I.R. (1974) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 71, 2048-2051. MEDLINE Abstract

21. McCready,S., Carr,A.M. and Lehman,A.R. (1993) Mol. Microbiol., 10, 855-890.

22. Yonemasu,R., McCready,S.J., Murray,J.M., Osman,F., Takao,M., Yamamoto,K., Lehmann,A.R. and Yasui,A. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1553-1558. MEDLINE Abstract

23. Ward,A.C., Castellli,L.A., Macreadie,I.G. and Azad,A.A. (1994) Yeast, 10, 441-449. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Bradford,M. (1976) Anal. Biochem., 72, 248-254. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Coligan,J.E., Dunn,B.M., Ploegh,H.L., Speicher,D.W. and Wingfield,P.T. (eds) (1997) Current Protocols in Protein Science. Vol. 1. Expression and Purification of GST Fusion Proteins. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

26. Laemmli,U. (1970) Nature, 227, 680-685. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Tu,C. and Cohen,S.N. (1980) Gene, 10, 177-183. MEDLINE Abstract

28. Ausubel,F.M., Brent,R., Kingston,R.E., Moore,D., Seidman,J.G., Smith,J.A. and Struhl,K. (eds) (1997) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1. Phosphatases and Kinases. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

29. Maxam,A. and Gilbert,W. (1980) Methods Enzymol., 65, 499-560. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Johnson,R.E., Kovvali,G.K., Prakash,L. and Prakash,S. (1995) Science, 269, 238-240. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Tishkoff,D.X., Filosi,N., Gaida,G.M. and Kolodner,R.D. (1997) Cell, 88, 253-263. MEDLINE Abstract

32. Freudenreich,C.H., Kantrow,S.M. and Zahian,V.A. (1998) Science, 279, 853-856. MEDLINE Abstract

33. Schweitzer,J.K. and Livingston,D.M. (1998) Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 69-74. MEDLINE Abstract

34. Birnboim,H. and Nasim,A. (1975) Mol. Gen. Genet., 136, 1-8.

35. Bowman,K.K., Sidik,K., Smith,C.A., Taylor,J.-S., Doetsch,P.W. and Freyer,G.A. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3026-3032. MEDLINE Abstract

36. Takao,M., Yonemasu,R., Yamamoto,K. and Yasui,A. (1996)Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 1267-1271. MEDLINE Abstract

37. Lehmann,A.R., Walicka,M., Griffiths,D.J.F., Murray,J.M., Watts,F.Z., McCready,S. and Carr,A.M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 7067-7080. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Lindahl,T. (1971) Eur. J. Biochem., 18, 407-414. MEDLINE Abstract

39. Klungland,A. and Lindahl,T. (1997) EMBO J., 16, 3341-3348. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 404 727 0409; Fax: +1 404 727 3954; Email: medpwd@emory.edu


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 30 Jul 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Ishikawa, Y. Kanai, K.-i. Takata, R. Takeuchi, K. Shimanouchi, T. Ruike, T. Furukawa, S. Kimura, and K. Sakaguchi
DmGEN, a novel RAD2 family endo-exonuclease from Drosophila melanogaster
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2004; 32(21): 6251 - 6259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Tomita, T. Kibe, H.-Y. Kang, Y.-S. Seo, M. Uritani, T. Ushimaru, and M. Ueno
Fission Yeast Dna2 Is Required for Generation of the Telomeric Single-Strand Overhang
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(21): 9557 - 9567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
N. M. Hollingsworth and S. J. Brill
The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2004; 18(2): 117 - 125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. L. Alleva and P. W. Doetsch
The nature of the 5'-terminus is a major determinant for DNA processing by Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad2p, a FEN-1 family nuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2000; 28(15): 2893 - 2901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Qiu, Y. Qian, P. Frank, U. Wintersberger, and B. Shen
Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase H(35) Functions in RNA Primer Removal during Lagging-Strand DNA Synthesis, Most Efficiently in Cooperation with Rad27 Nuclease
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 1999; 19(12): 8361 - 8371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Kaur, J. L. A. Fraser, G. A. Freyer, S. Davey, and P. W. Doetsch
A Uve1p-Mediated Mismatch Repair Pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 1999; 19(7): 4703 - 4710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Henricksen, S. Tom, Y. Liu, and R. A. Bambara
Inhibition of Flap Endonuclease 1 by Flap Secondary Structure and Relevance to Repeat Sequence Expansion
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2000; 275(22): 16420 - 16427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (181K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alleva, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?