| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
A capillary electrophoresis mobility shift assay for protein-DNA binding affinities free in solution
Acknowledgements
References
A capillary electrophoresis mobility shift assay for protein-DNA binding affinities free in solution
ABSTRACT
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) separates analytes on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio. Our method takes particular advantage of the electroosmotic flow generated by the negatively charged silanol groups on the capillary walls at [ge]pH 6 (7). This CE assay uses the reverse polarity of EMSA, and the order of elution is reversed: free protein, protein/DNA complex, then DNA.
CEMSA has the advantages of automation, high resolution, fast assay times, on-line detection and the use of small amounts of precious samples. CE has been applied to the study of DNA-protein complexes using fluorescently-labeled DNA with LIF detection, but not free in solution (8-10). In our method, 2 min separations in short, uncoated capillaries, without sieving matrixes, are coupled with precise quantitation of Kd values. We used the yeast transcriptional activator GCNK58 construct (11) as the prototype for measuring DNA-binding affinity by the new CEMSA method. The method is general for different classes of DNA-binding proteins, including zinc-finger and basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine-zipper (b-HLH-ZIP; G.J.Foulds and F.A.Etzkorn, unpublished results).
Excellent separation of the free AP1, complex and GCNK58 was obtained using CE in uncoated, gel-free capillaries with LIF detection of fluorescein-labeled DNA. In a benchmark assay, we measured the dissociation constant of the DNA-binding protein GCNK58 and a 20 bp oligonucleotide including the recognition site AP1 (11).
For CEMSA, the zwitterionic buffer 3-(N-morpholino)-propane sulfonic acid (MOPS) with the soft counterion triethylamine (Et3N) was found to yield better peak shape and resolution with low current at high voltage (25 kV) than the phosphate buffer used in the EMSA of GCNK58 (5). High voltage gave fast separation and low current gave less Joule heating, allowing the complex to stay intact during electrophoresis. The difference in ionic strength between the sample buffer (50 mM MOPS·Et3N, 50 mM KCl) and the run buffer (10 mM MOPS·Et3N) helped maintain the original concentration of complex during the separation (2). The minimum-length capillary column that fits the Beckman CE cartridge (27 or 20 cm from inlet to detector) was used. The ratio of complex peak area to total DNA (R, see below) was found to be independent of the applied voltage at 25 kV and below, so 25 kV was used as the standard applied voltage in our CEMSA. Adsorbed ions were removed and the charged capillary wall was regenerated by washing with 0.1 M NaOH and run buffer between runs.
Figure 1. Electropherograms of AP1 at 1 nM and GCNK58 at the indicated concentrations in 50 mM MOPS·Et3N pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 133 µg/ml poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT), 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 5% glycerol. DNA was synthesized (Biomolecular Research Facility, University of Virginia) with 5[prime]-carboxyfluorescein phosphoramidite (Glen Research) attached. d(AAACTGGATGAGTCATAGGA) (3 nM) and Xd(TTCCTATGACTCATCCAGTT) (2 nM) where X is fluorescein (AP1), were freshly annealed at 90°C for 5 min and cooled slowly to room temperature. Serial dilutions of GCNK58 were mixed with an equal volume (10 µl) of annealed AP1 and preincubated at 4°C for 2-3 h. CE was performed on a Beckman P/ACE 2100 with Laser Module 488, LIF detector and System Gold software (v. 8.1) in 75 µm ID uncoated capillaries (Polymicro Technologies), 27 cm long, 20 cm effective length to the detector, with a cooled sample tray. Before runs, the capillary was rinsed for 2 min with 0.1 M NaOH and 2 min with run buffer: 10 mM MOPS·Et3N pH 7.5. Samples were injected for 2 s at low pressure and electrophoresed at 25 kV in run buffer at 22°C, at normal CE polarity (cathode at the detector end). Figure R = [GCNK582·AP1]/{[GCNK582·AP1] + [AP1]}, was plotted against increasing concentrations of GCNK58 (Fig. The equilibrium dissociation constant for homodimer-DNA complex formation, Kd, was found to be 35 ± 4 nM. This value is the same as determined by isothermal calorimetry in the sample buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 (35.1 ± 8.9 nM) (6), and reasonably close to a Kd value previously determined by EMSA in 50 mM KxPO4 pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl(2 × 10-8 M) (5), both without non-specific DNA included in the sample buffer. Inclusion of the non-specific DNA, poly(dA·dT), gives a Kd value representative of specific DNA binding only (12). In the absence of the non-specific DNA, as in the EMSA (5), a lower Kd value of 1.6 ± 0.2 nM was obtained (data not shown). In this case, cooperativity of dimerization and DNA-binding was observed. We used equation 2: including the dimerization constant of 0.57 ± 0.19 µM (13) to fit the data. This result is unexpected in light of observations that sequestration (14) and caging (4) effects stabilize some protein/DNA complexes during gel electrophoresis (15). The fast separations of our assay may prevent dissociation of the complex even in the absence of gel matrix. We have developed a fast, precise and practical CEMSA for DNA-protein affinities. Each concentration was analyzed in 3 min with a 4 min wash cycle. A series of six concentrations was performed in duplicate in ~85 min on a single column CE instrument. The assay uses open, uncoated capillaries, no radioactivity and an automatic sample tray, permitting hands-off assays to be performed routinely. The measured affinity of the GCNK58/AP1 complex was 35 ± 4 nM. Figure 2. Saturation of AP1 (R) versus concentration of GCNK58. Kd was calculated to be 35 ± 4 nM by non-linear least squares fit of the data to equation 1 using KaleidaGraph v. 3.0.5. We thank Professor Tom Ellenberger of Harvard Medical School for supplying us with generous quantities of GCNK58 protein. We thank Mike Black of Beckman Instruments for his assistance in preliminary development of the assay. This work was supported in part by a New Zealand Science and Technology Postdoctoral Fellowship to G.J.F., Grant no. UOV701, and by NIH Grant no. 1 R29 GM52516-01 to F.A.E.
R = 0.5[GCNK58]/{Kd + 0.5[GCNK58]}
1
R = (570 nM)-1[GCNK58]2/{Kd + (570 nM)-1[GCNK58]2}
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 29 Aug 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. A. Ouameur and H.-A. Tajmir-Riahi
Structural Analysis of DNA Interactions with Biogenic Polyamines and Cobalt(III)hexamine Studied by Fourier Transform Infrared and Capillary Electrophoresis
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 1, 2004;
279(40):
42041 - 42054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. F. Fraga, E. Ballestar, G. Montoya, P. Taysavang, P. A. Wade, and M. Esteller
The affinity of different MBD proteins for a specific methylated locus depends on their intrinsic binding properties
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 15, 2003;
31(6):
1765 - 1774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Print PDF (35K)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Foulds, G. J.
![]()
Articles by Etzkorn, F. A.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Foulds, G. J.
![]()
Articles by Etzkorn, F. A.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?