Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (118K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janscak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Firman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janscak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Firman, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 4439-4445  


Analysis of the subunit assembly of the typeIC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   DNA substrates
   Protein preparations
   Reconstitution of the endonuclease
   Determination of subunit ratio in the endonuclease-DNA complexes
   HPLC gel filtration
   DNA cleavage and ATPase assays
   Gel retardation assay
Results
   Gel retardation analysis of EcoR124I endonuclease reveals two molecular species
   Analysis of subunit stoichiometry in protein-DNA complexes of EcoR124I
   Analysis of interaction between the MTase and HsdR in the presence of DNA
   Analysis of interactions between the MTase and HsdR in the absence of DNA
   DNA cleavage and ATPase activities of MTase-HsdR complexes
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


Analysis of the subunit assembly of the typeIC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I

Analysis of the subunit assembly of the typeIC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124I

Pavel Janscak+, David T. F. Dryden1 and Keith Firman*

Biophysics Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, St Michael's Building,White Swan Road, Portsmouth PO1 2DT, UK and 1Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, Edinburgh University, Darwin Building, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK

Received June 2, 1998; Revised and Accepted August 14, 1998

ABSTRACT

Type I restriction-modification (R-M) enzymes are composed of three different subunits, of which HsdS determines DNA specificity, HsdM is responsible for DNA methylation and HsdR is required for restriction. The HsdM and HsdS subunits can also form an independent DNA methyltransferase with a subunit stoichiometry of M2S1. We found that the purified EcoR124I R-M enzyme was a mixture of two species as detected by the presence of two differently migrating specific DNA-protein complexes in a gel retardation assay. An analysis of protein subunits isolated from the complexes indicated that the larger species had a stoichiometry of R2M2S1 and the smaller species had a stoichiometry of R1M2S1. In vitro analysis of subunit assembly revealed that while binding of the first HsdR subunit to the M2S1 complex was very tight, the second HsdR subunit was bound weakly and it dissociated from the R1M2S1 complex with an apparent Kd of~2.4 × 10-7 M. Functional assays have shown that only the R2M2S1 complex is capable of DNA cleavage, however, the R1M2S1 complex retains ATPase activity. The relevance of this situation is discussed in terms of the regulation of restriction activity in vivo upon conjugative transfer of a plasmid-born R-M system into an unmodified host cell.

INTRODUCTION

Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems protect the bacterial cell against invasion of foreign DNA (such as viruses) by cleaving DNA which lacks a target specific N6-adenine methylation. The second physiological role of these systems is to restore full methylation of the target sites on the host DNA after DNA replication. Type I R-M enzymes are composed of three different subunits (HsdR, HsdM and HsdS) encoded by the three hsd genes (for recent reviews see 1,2). All three subunits are absolutely required for restriction activity, while the HsdM and HsdS subunits are sufficient for modification activity and can also form an independent DNA methyltransferase (MTase). Type I R-M enzymes specifically recognise a non-palindromic DNA sequence (e.g. GAAnnnnnnRTCG for EcoR124I, where n is any base and R is a purine) but cleave DNA at a non-specific site distant from the recognition sequence using Mg2+, S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and ATP as cofactors (3,4). Binding of the endonuclease to a non-modified recognition site activates a powerful ATPase activity (5), which fuels DNA translocation past the DNA-enzyme complex, while the enzyme remains bound to the recognition site (6,7). DNA is cleaved at positions where the DNA translocation stops either due to a collision of two translocating enzyme molecules on two-site, linear DNA substrates (8,9), or due to the build-up of topological strain on circular molecules (10). The endonuclease does not turnover in the cleavage reaction, however, the ATPase activity continues for a long period of time after the cleavage is completed (3,5). DNA methylation activity of the type I R-M systems results in a transfer of a methyl group from AdoMet to the N-6 position of a specific adenine in each strand of the recognition sequence (11,12).

Type I R-M systems are grouped into four families based on allelic complementation, protein homologies and biochemical properties of the enzymes. Types IA, IB and ID R-M systems are chromosomally encoded (13,14) while most type IC R-M systems are carried on large conjugative plasmids (15-17). The type IA family is typified by the EcoKI and EcoBI enzymes, type IB by EcoAI and type IC by EcoR124I. EcoKI forms a stable R2M2S1 complex; the independent EcoKI MTase (M2S1) is, however, a relatively weak complex, dissociating into an inactive M1S1 species and free HsdM subunit (18-20). The purified EcoBI restriction endonuclease has been described as existing in a number of different stoichiometric forms including R2M2S1, R1M2S1 and R1M1S1 (21). The type IB restriction endonuclease EcoAI was found to be a weak complex that dissociated into MTase and HsdR subunit when purified, and the active endonuclease could only be studied following assembly in vitro (22). We have recently purified the EcoR124I restriction endonuclease from a cell culture harbouring a recombinant, two-plasmid system, which over-produces all three subunits. The stoichiometry of this endonuclease preparation appeared to be R1M2S1 (23). The EcoR124I MTase has also been over-produced and purified to homogeneity (12,24). This enzyme was found to exist only in the M2S1 stoichiometry and no M1S1 complex has been detected (12).

The hsd genes of all R-M systems can be transferred into an unmodified host by conjugation, transformation or transfection despite the fact that the presence of a restriction enzyme in the recipient cell would be a lethal event (17,23,25-31). It has been reported that the appearance of restriction activity was delayed after conjugative transfer of EcoKI genes into an unmodified host, while the modification activity was expressed immediately after the conjugation (29). It was proposed that restriction and modification activities of the EcoKI R-M system are regulated by a gene distant from the hsd locus since the conjugative transfer of EcoKI hsd genes into a mutant form of Escherichia coli C (designated as hsdC) had a lethal effect on the cell (29). The same regulation mechanism was found to be employed in the type IB R-M systems (32). However, the conjugal transfer of EcoR124I (IC) hsd genes into the hsdC mutant was not lethal and full restriction activity was detected six generations after the start of conjugation (32). Recently, it has been shown that ClpX and ClpP, components of the ClpXP protease, are necessary for efficient transmission of genes encoding the EcoKI and EcoAI R-M systems, suggesting protease-mediated post-translational control of restriction and modification (33). The involvement of protease control of restriction and modification would support the proposal that post-translational control of restriction activity of EcoKI could be related to subunit assembly (20).

In this paper we show that the purified EcoR124I restriction endonuclease is a mixture of two species, which have a subunit stoichiometry of R2M2S1 and R1M2S1, respectively. Only the former species was found to have endonuclease activity. However, the R2M2S1 complex is relatively weak, dissociating into free HsdR subunit and the restriction-deficient R1M2S1 assembly intermediate, which appears to be a very tight complex. We discuss the relevance of this situation with respect to the propagation of a conjugative plasmid-borne R-M system into an unmodified host cell. We suggest that control of EcoR124I endonuclease activity in vivo is at the level of subunit assembly in a manner similar to that observed for EcoKI (20).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA substrates

Complementary HPLC-purified oligonucleotides used in the gel retardation assays were purchased from Cruachem Ltd. The EcoR124I recognition site is shown in bold (top strand: 5[prime]-CTACGGTACCGAAACGCGTGTCGGGCCCGCGAAGCTTGC-3[prime]), DNA concentration was determined from the absorption at 260 nm. The extinction coefficients of the oligonucleotides and the annealed oligoduplex were calculated as a sum of the contributions from individual nucleotides, taking into account hyperchromicity observed after digestion of the DNA to completion with snake venom phosphodiesterase (34). The oligoduplex (usually 2.5 µg) was 5[prime]-end-labelled using [[gamma]-32P]ATP (25 µCi) and T4 polynucleotide kinase. Unincorporated label was removed using `Nuctrap' columns (Stratagene).

A 2891 bp plasmid containing a single EcoR124I recognition site, pDRM-1R, (23) used in DNA cleavage assays was produced from E.coli HB101 (35) and its covalently closed form was purified by an equilibrium centrifugation in a CsCl-ethidium bromide gradient (36).

Protein preparations

The EcoR124I restriction endonuclease, MTase (M2S1) and HsdR subunit were over-produced and purified as described previously (12,23). Either the plasmid pACR124 or pBGSR124 containing the hsdR gene under the control of the Ptrc promoter (23), were used together with the MTase plasmid pJS4M (24) to over-produce the endonuclease. The latter plasmid combination produced a higher concentration of HsdR than the former, presumably due to the higher copy number of pBGSR124. Both two-plasmid systems produced the same concentrations of the HsdS and HsdM subunits (data not shown). To obtain a stable clone containing the pJS4M-pBGSR124 plasmid-expression system, the cells were first transformed with the pJS4M plasmid (MTase) and then with pBGSR124 plasmid (HsdR). Transformation of pJS4M and pBGSR124 at the same time was found to be lethal. The molar concentration of purified proteins was determined from the absorbance at 280 nm using molar extinction coefficients calculated as a sum of contributions from tyrosines and tryptophans in the predicted amino acid sequences [HsdR subunit;91 900/M/cm, MTase (M2S1); 160 400/M/cm, endonuclease,252 300/M/cm for R1M2S1, 344 200/M/cm for R2M2S1].

Reconstitution of the endonuclease

Fully active reconstituted EcoR124I endonuclease, used in the DNA cleavage and gel retardation assays, was simply produced by mixing of the purified MTase (M2S1) and HsdR subunit in assay reaction buffers (see below). The concentration of active endonuclease was taken as the input concentration of the MTase.

Determination of subunit ratio in the endonuclease-DNA complexes

The two DNA-protein complexes observed with purified and reconstituted EcoR124I endonucleases (Fig. 1) were separated in preparative amounts (2 µM 39mer DNA in 10 µl binding reaction) on a non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. After staining the gel in ethidium bromide solution, fluorescent bands were excised from the gel, mashed and protein extracted with SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Protein extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE together with a series of R/MTase mixtures of known molar ratios. After staining with Coomassie Blue R250, the gel was quantified by densitometry using Image Grabber 2.05b1 and NIH image 1.52 software. The ratio of densitometer traces of individual subunits (S:M:R) was calculated for each sample. To determine the stoichiometry of the species isolated of the DNA-protein complexes, the best fit between their S:M:R ratios and one of the values obtained with the R/MTase mixtures was determined.

HPLC gel filtration

HPLC gel filtration used a Rainin Dynamax 4.6 × 250 mm Hydropore-5-SEC column and a guard column. Samples of 20 or 50 µl, in 20 mM Tris, 20 mM 2-[N-morpholine] ethane sulphonic acid (MES), 0.2 M NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 7 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 6.5, were injected onto the column. The samples were equilibrated at room temperature for varying time periods up to 24 h prior to injection. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min and detection was most sensitive and stable at 254 nm. The column was calibrated with a series of globular proteins of known molecular weight giving a linear calibration curve of log (molecular weight) as a function of elution time. Most of our samples after buffer exchange into the column buffer using PD10 Sephadex G50 columns (Pharmacia), contained trace amounts of a small molecule which we believe to be glycerol. This gave rise to a `solvent peak' after ~6.5 min, the elution time of which served as an internal standard to correct for slight run to run variation in protein elution times. The apparent molecular weight of the proteins eluting from the column was calculated. In the titration of MTase with HsdR subunit, the HsdR subunit-MTase complex was present only as a partially resolved shoulder when HsdR subunit was in large excess of the MTase.

DNA cleavage and ATPase assays

DNA cleavage and ATPase activities of EcoR124I restriction endonuclease were assayed using plasmid pDRM-1R (single EcoR124I site) as described previously (23). DNA, usually at a concentration of 200 nM, was incubated either with an equimolar concentration of the MTase and increasing concentration of the HsdR, or with a range of concentrations of reconstituted endonuclease. After addition of ATP, the reactions were incubated for 5 min (sufficient time to reach the reaction endpoint). DNA cleavage activity (concentration of full-length linear plasmid DNA) and ATPase activity (concentration of inorganic phosphate) were measured as described previously (23).

Gel retardation assay

DNA binding reactions were usually performed in a volume of 10 µl in the presence of a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT and 10% (v/v) glycerol. The end-labelled 39mer oligoduplex (see above) of known concentration was incubated with purified endonuclease, MTase and MTase/HsdR or endonuclease (ENase)/HsdR mixtures over a range of various concentrations and/or protein:protein ratios, respectively, at room temperature for 10 min. Unbound DNA and DNA-protein complexes were separated on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel run, at 4oC, at 100 V in 40 mM Tris-acetate pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA buffer (TAE). After electrophoresis, gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography or quantified using a PhosphorImager and Image Quant software.

RESULTS

Gel retardation analysis of EcoR124I endonuclease reveals two molecular species

We have previously purified the EcoR124I endonuclease following over-production of the protein by a recombinant, two-plasmid system consisting of pJS4M (MTase) and pACR124 (HsdR). Using a combination of data from gel filtration and densitometric scanning SDS-polyacrylamide gels stained with Coomassie Blue, we concluded that this enzyme had a stoichiometry of R1M2S1 (23).


Figure 1. Gel retardation analysis of purified EcoR124I restriction endonuclease. DNA binding reactions were carried out with 200 nM 39mer oligoduplexes as described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, free DNA; lane 2, 200 nM endonuclease over-produced by the pJS4M-pACR124 plasmid system; lane 3, as lane 2 plus 1 µM HsdR; lane 4, 200 nM endonuclease over-produced by the pJS4M-pBGSR124 plasmid system; lane 5, as lane 4 plus 1 µM HsdR; lane 6, as lane 4 plus 200 nM MTase; lane 7, 200 nM MTase; lane 8, 200 nM MTase plus 200 nM HsdR; lane 9, 200 nM MTase plus 1200 nM HsdR. Positions of individual DNA-protein complexes and unbound DNA on the gel are indicated.

To investigate the DNA-binding properties of the over-produced EcoR124I endonuclease, the technique of gel retardation, with a 39mer oligoduplex carrying a single EcoR124I recognition site, was utilised. Unexpectedly, two DNA-protein complexes were observed after separation of bound and unbound DNA on a non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 1, lane 2). The complex with faster mobility (complex I) was preferentially formed (88% of bound DNA). When the plasmid pBGSR124 (23), a higher copy number plasmid, which produces a significantly higher level of HsdR than the plasmid pACR124, was used with the plasmid pJS4M in the two-plasmid over-producing system, the enzyme preparation showed a different ratio between the two complexes; 53% of complex I and 47% of complex II (Fig. 1, lane 4). To exclude non-specific DNA binding, the experiment was repeated in the presence of excess competitor DNA (poly dI-dC), but no change was observed in the two retarded DNA bands (data not shown). Another possibility was that there were two stoichiometric species present in the endonuclease preparations. This was confirmed by the following results. Addition of excess HsdR to both endonuclease preparations resulted in the disappearance of the complex I and increased the concentration of the complex II (Fig. 1, lanes 3 and 5). A 1:1 mixture of HsdR and the MTase (M2S1) produced only complex I, while the 6:1 mixture of HsdR and the MTase produced mostly complex II (Fig. 1, lanes 8 and 9). Finally, addition of the MTase to the mixture of the endonuclease and DNA led to the disappearance of complex II and increased the amount of complex I (Fig. 1, lane 6). These results indicate that the two observed species vary in the number of HsdR subunits, and the lower molecular weight species is preferentially formed at HsdR:MTase ratios <1.

Analysis of subunit stoichiometry in protein-DNA complexes of EcoR124I

To investigate the stoichiometry of the two species present in the endonuclease preparations, the proteins bound in complexes I and II were extracted from the retardation gel and subjected to an SDS-PAGE analysis together with a series of R/MTase mixtures, including ratios 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1. The relative ratio of the three endonuclease subunits, in each sample, was determined from a densitometer scan of the polyacrylamide gel after staining the gel with Coomassie Blue (23). As can be seen in Figure 2, the ratio of subunits in the protein extracted from the complex I agrees with the subunit ratio in the 1:1 mixture of HsdR and MTase and the protein from complex II corresponds with the 2:1 mixture. Thus the protein species bound in complex I has a stoichiometry of R1M2S1 and that bound in complex II has a stoichiometry of R2M2S1.


Figure 2. Subunit composition of the gel-retarded protein-DNA complexes of EcoR124I. The histograms compare relative ratios of subunits extracted from the two DNA-protein complexes of purified EcoR124I endonuclease produced by the pJS4M-pBGSR124 plasmid system (complexes I and II shown in Fig. 1) to the relative ratios of subunits in a series of mixtures of HsdR and MTase, as determined by densitometric scanning of SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie Blue. White bars, HsdS; grey bars, HsdM; black bars, HsdR. Panels 1-5 on the x-axis correspond to the following HsdR:MTase ratios: 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1. Panels 6 and 7 are complex I and complex II, respectively. The data suggest that the stoichiometry of the species in complex I is R1M2S1, and the stoichiometry of the species in complex II is R2M2S1.

Analysis of interaction between the MTase and HsdR in the presence of DNA

To investigate the endonuclease assembly in vitro, we performed a reconstitution titration of the MTase (M2S1) with the HsdR subunit, and followed this by a gel retardation assay using a 39mer oligoduplex carrying the EcoR124I recognition site (Fig. 3). As can be seen, increased concentration of HsdR resulted in the disappearance of the M2S1-DNA complex and appearance of complex I. At an HsdR:MTase (R:M2S1) molar ratio of 1, only complex I was present. This suggests that one of the two R-binding sites in the MTase is stronger than the other one since in the case of two equivalent binding sites, at an HsdR:MTase ratio of 1, 50% MTase would be occupied with one HsdR subunit, 25% would be occupied with two HsdR subunits and 25% MTase would bind no HsdR subunit. Equivalent binding sites for HsdR have been observed for EcoKI (L.Powell and D.Dryden, unpublished observations). The R2M2S1-DNA complex started to appear only when the HsdR:MTase ratio was >1; while under these conditions the R1M2S1-DNA complex disappeared. However, the R2M2S1-DNA complex was not fully present at an HsdR:MTase molar ratio of 2, and even above the molar ratio of 3 there was still a smear on the gel, lying between the two complexes. This suggests that the R2M2S1 species is a much weaker complex than the R1M2S1 species and that the smear corresponds to its dissociation into R1M2S1 and HsdR within the gel matrix.


Figure 3. Titration of EcoR124I MTase with HsdR followed by gel retardation assay. A mixture of 200 nM MTase and 200 nM 39mer oligoduplex, containing one EcoR124I recognition site, was incubated with increasing concentrations of HsdR subunit at room temperature for 10 min. DNA-protein complexes and free DNA were separated on a non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel as described in Materials and Methods. The HsdR:MTase ratio in individual reactions and the position of DNA-protein complexes on the gel are indicated.

In order to measure an apparent dissociation constant characterising the equilibrium between R1M2S1 and R2M2S1 species, the subunit complexes present in a series of dilutions of a 1:2 mixture of the MTase and HsdR, starting from a protein concentration of 1 mM, were analysed by gel retardation assay in the presence of 20 nM 39mer oligoduplex. Figure 4a shows that at a protein concentration of 1 mM, the R2M2S1 species was almost exclusively present. However, a faint band appeared on the top of the gel at high protein concentrations apparently due to protein aggregation or non-specific binding of a second endonuclease molecule. When the protein was diluted, the R2M2S1 species dissociated to R1M2S1 (seen as an increased concentration of the R1M2S1-DNA complex) which appeared to be stable in the concentration range used in the experiment (10-6-10-9 M). The retardation gel was quantified (Materials and Methods) and the percentage of the R2M2S1-DNA complex of the total bound DNA was plotted as a function of protein concentration (Fig. 4b). Only data for protein concentrations >20 nM were used for plotting since at lower concentrations dissociation of the DNA-protein complex occurred (Fig. 4a). An apparent equilibrium dissociation constant of the R2M2S1 complex was determined as the concentration of enzyme where 50% of R2M2S1-DNA was dissociated to R1M2S1-DNA. The value was estimated at ~2.4 × 10-7 M. Similar dilution experiments were also performed with a 1:1 mixture of MTase and HsdR (containing only R1M2S1). No dissociation of R1M2S1 complex into the MTase and HsdR was observed even at the lowest protein concentrations detectable by the gel retardation assay (10-9 M) (not shown). Therefore, the R1M2S1 species is apparently a very stable complex.

Table 1. Molecular weights of complexes found for the EcoRl24I system
Sample Apparent molecular weight by
HPLC gel filtration (kDa)
Expected molecular weight (kDa)
M2S1 MTase 220-230 162.2
HsdR subunit 137-148 119.6
In vivo assembled R1M2S1a 280-300 281.8
In vivo assembled mixture of R1M2S1 + R2M2S1b 333-350 281.8 + 401.5
In vitro assembled R2M2S1 (freshly prepared) 290-315 401.5
In vitro assembled R2M2S1 (after 24 h incubation) 380-420 401.5
aProduced by the pJS4M-pACR124 plasmid system.
bProduced by the pJS4M-pBGSR124 plasmid system.

Analysis of interactions between the MTase and HsdR in the absence of DNA

To analyse endonuclease assembly in the absence of DNA, we used HPLC gel filtration. The apparent molecular weights of various subunit complexes of EcoR124I from an HPLC gel filtration column were determined from their elution times and are given in Table 1. It can be seen that the MTase and HsdR subunit eluted from the column earlier than expected, giving a slightly higher weight. Similar behaviour was observed for the EcoKI enzyme (20). The endonuclease purified from cells containing the pJS4M-pACR124 plasmid-expression system eluted with an apparent molecular weight similar to that expected for R1M2S1. This is in agreement with previously published data (23). The endonuclease purified from cell culture containing the pJS4M-pBGSR124 plasmid-expression system had an apparent mass intermediate between R1M2S1 and R2M2S1 and formed a slightly asymmetric peak suggesting that it was a mixture of these two species. A freshly prepared mixture of MTase with a 5-fold excess of HsdR subunit, eluted with an apparent weight close to that expected for R1M2S1. However, the same mixture after a 24 h incubation at room temperature showed the formation of a higher molecular weight species with a weight equal to that expected for the R2M2S1 endonuclease. Figure 5a shows the elution profiles of the HsdR subunit, MTase and a mixture of these two components freshly prepared and after 24 h. The titration of a constant concentration of MTase with the HsdR subunit also showed the dramatic change in molecular weight of the complex upon prolonged incubation (Fig. 5b). Therefore, HPLC data indicated that the formation of the R2M2S1 complex is a slow process under the conditions used. One possible explanation of this observation is that the presence of 5% glycerol in the samples slows diffusion; although it seems unlikely that this would be a large effect. Alternatively, it appears likely that the presence of DNA in the sample grossly changes the rate of attainment of thermodynamic equilibrium. This idea is supported by the fact that DNA cleavage appeared in a very short time following mixing of MTase and HsdR in the presence of DNA (see the next section).

   (a)

   (b)

Figure 4. Dissociation of the EcoR124I endonuclease complex. Dissociation of R2M2S1 into R1M2S1 and HsdR was monitored by a gel retardation assay with the 39mer oligoduplex containing one EcoR124I recognition site. The endonuclease was reconstituted by mixing the MTase and HsdR in a molar ratio of 1:2. A series of dilutions of this mixture in a concentration range from 1000 to 5 nM was incubated with 20 nM DNA at room temperature for 10 min and subsequently analysed on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (a). Lanes 1-12 correspond to the following protein concentrations: 1000, 500, 200, 150, 100, 80, 60, 40, 20, 10, 5, 0 nM. The gel was quantified using a PhosphorImager and the percentage of R2M2S1-DNA complex of the total bound DNA was plotted against protein concentration (b).

   (a)

   (b)

Figure 5. Elution profiles from the HPLC gel filtration column and titration of MTase with HsdR followed by HPLC gel filtration. (a) From left to right the traces show MTase (420 nM), HsdR subunit (1 µM), MTase (420 nM) freshly mixed with a 5-fold excess of HsdR subunit, and MTase (420 nM) incubated with a 5-fold excess of HsdR subunit for 24 h before application to the column. The numbers are the elution times, in minutes, of the peaks. (b) The molecular weight, determined by HPLC gel filtration, of the complex formed between MTase and HsdR subunit as the HsdR subunit concentration is increased. The MTase concentration was 420 nM throughout. The samples were applied to the column immediately after mixing ([open circle]) or after 24 h incubation ([solid circle]). The lines drawn are only to guide the eye.

DNA cleavage and ATPase activities of MTase-HsdR complexes

To investigate enzyme activities of the R1M2S1 and R2M2S1 species, DNA cleavage and ATP hydrolysis were assayed following a reconstitution titration of the MTase with HsdR in the presence of a plasmid DNA substrate. The DNA used contained a single EcoR124I recognition site. This DNA readily undergoes primary cleavage to produce full-length linear DNA. Secondary processing of the linear product is observed only at very high enzyme:DNA ratios (23). Reaction products (linear DNA and inorganic phosphate, respectively) were quantified by densitometric scanning of agarose gels and malachite green assay as described elsewhere (23). A gradually increasing concentration of HsdR subunit was added into a 1:1 mixture of the MTase and DNA, which were present at a concentration of 200 nM to ensure full DNA binding. The same concentration conditions were also used in the reconstitution titration followed by a gel retardation assay (Fig. 3). At an HsdR:MTase ratio <1, where only the R1M2S1 complex was detected by a gel retardation assay, no DNA cleavage occurred (Fig. 6a). However, ATPase activity gradually increased with HsdR concentration (Fig. 6b). It is important to note that the HsdR subunit by itself shows only a weak DNA/Mg2+-dependent ATPase activity which is 100 times lower than that of the endonuclease (37). DNA cleavage appeared only when the HsdR:MTase ratio was >1 and the R2M2S1 complex was formed (Fig. 6a). Both activities approached saturation level at an HsdR:MTase ratio of 4-5, where the gel retardation assay indicated that the R2M2S1 species was fully present. These data indicate that only the R2M2S1 species is capable of DNA cleavage.

DISCUSSION

The gel retardation and DNA cleavage experiments presented in this work revealed that the active form of the type IC EcoR124I restriction endonuclease has a subunit stoichiometry of R2M2S1. It is assembled from the trimeric MTase (M2S1) and the HsdR subunits through a stable intermediate with a stoichiometry of R1M2S1, which does not cleave DNA. While binding between the MTase and the first HsdR subunit is apparently very stable, interaction between the R1M2S1 intermediate and the second HsdR subunit is much weaker. The R2M2S1 complex dissociated into the R1M2S1 complex and the HsdR subunit with an apparent Kd of ~2.4 × 10-7 M (Fig. 4).

In contrast to EcoR124I, the R2M2S1 complex of EcoKI endonuclease, a member of the type IA family, is relatively stable and both HsdR subunits appear to be bound to the MTase with similar affinities (20; L.Powell and N.Murray, personal communication).

Our results indicate that the two HsdR subunits interact differently with the MTase in the assembly of the EcoR124I endonuclease. A simple model for assembly would be that there are two equivalent HsdR-binding sites on the MTase, but that the presence of one bound HsdR subunit affects the binding of the second HsdR subunit perhaps by partially blocking the second site, or by means of a conformational change at the second site. This model would require that the R1M2S1 complex should be a 1:1 mixture of two species with occupation of either of the two HsdR-binding sites. A second model would require that the two sites are not equivalent and that the assembly is inherently asymmetric with only one type of R1M2S1 complex being formed. However, the data presented in this work are not sufficient to definitely determine which model is applicable.


Figure 6. Titration of EcoR124I MTase with HsdR, followed by measurement of DNA cleavage and ATPase activity. A mixture of 200 nM MTase and 200 nM pDRM-1R DNA was incubated with increasing concentrations of HsdR in the presence of 0.2 mM AdoMet and 10 mM ATP. Concentration of linear DNA produced after 5 min incubation (a) and the rate of ATP hydrolysis (b) was plotted against HsdR:MTase molar ratio. Reaction products were quantified as described elsewhere (23). The lines drawn are only to guide the eye.

Since binding of the first HsdR subunit to the MTase is much stronger than binding the second HsdR subunit to the R1M2S1 intermediate, the in vivo formation of the R2M2S1 complex will be dependent on the ratio between the HsdR subunit and the MTase in the cell. At an HsdR:MTase ratio of <1, only the R1M2S1 complex will be present. The R2M2S1 complex will be formed only when the HsdR:MTase ratio is >1. Indeed, when the ratio between MTase and HsdR was varied in vivo by using different recombinant two-plasmid systems, the resulting endonuclease preparations differed in ratio between the species (Fig. 1). The purified endonuclease produced from hsd genes under the control of their natural promoters was also found to be a mixture of R1M2S1 and R2M2S1 species (J.Dreier, personal communication). This shows that the heterogeneity of the stoichiometry of EcoR124I endonuclease assembled in vivo was not a result of using an artificial expression system. The presence of two non-equivalent binding sites for HsdR has also been shown using the technique of surface plasmon resonance (38). This clearly supports the data presented in this paper and has shown that the two sites differ in binding affinity by at least two orders of magnitude. Since two separate techniques have demonstrated the equilibrium between the R2M2S1 and R1M2S1 forms of the endonuclease, we believe the slow assembly of the R2 complex in the absence of DNA, as measured by HPLC gel filtration, either reflects the experimental conditions used, or the absence of DNA greatly decreases the rate for attainment of thermodynamic equilibrium.

Why should the restriction endonuclease of the EcoR124I R-M system be such a weak complex and the stable assembly intermediate R1M2S1 not be able to cleave DNA? We suggest this may reflect a very sensitive mechanism for regulation of restriction activity following conjugative transfer of the hsd genes into a non-modified recipient cell. The EcoR124I R-M system was originally found on the conjugative plasmid R124 (16) and this presents an unusual problem for the recipient cell. If the R124 plasmid entered a new host and immediately produced an active endonuclease, the unmodified host DNA would be restricted and the host cell would not survive. However, this does not happen and the host chromosome is modified following conjugation. Despite various attempts to show transcriptional or post-transcriptional control of this phenomenon for the EcoR124I R-M system (32; K.Firman, unpublished observations), there is no evidence of such control. Nor is there any evidence of such control for the other type I R-M systems. Therefore, we propose that this control is exercised at the level of subunit assembly. The M2S1MTase is a very tight complex and it will be assembled first in the cell. Since the MTase can form a tight complex with one HsdR subunit, which does not cleave DNA, all the HsdR subunit will initially be trapped in this inactive complex. Therefore, the MTase (and possibly the R1M2S1 complex) can modify and protect the host DNA. The weak endonuclease complex R2M2S1 can be formed only when a large amount of HsdR has built up in the cell, which is unlikely during the early stage of establishing the R-M system in a new host. When cellular levels of individual subunits were altered by using different promoters and expression vectors, it was observed that excess HsdR over MTase was lethal, unless the MTase was already established in the cell (23). This implies that the function of the EcoR124I endonuclease in the cell is finely balanced and absolutely dependent upon subunit concentration. Control of restriction and modification via subunit assembly has also been recently proposed for the EcoKI restriction endonuclease (20), suggesting this mechanism may be common to all type I systems. In addition, the EcoR124I system shows a relatively high methylation activity with non-modified DNA (23) when compared to that of EcoKI (11). This will also ensure that a non-modified chromosome in the recipient cell can be readily modified following conjugal transfer of the hsd genes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Lynn Powell and Noreen Murray (University of Edinburgh) for communicating results prior to publication. P.J. was supported by an International Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust. D.D. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.

REFERENCES

1. Bickle,T.A. and Krüger,D.H. (1993) Microbiol. Rev., 57, 434-450. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Wilson,G.G. and Murray,N.E. (1991) Annu. Rev. Genet., 25, 585-627. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Eskin,B. and Linn,S. (1972) J. Biol. Chem., 247, 6183-6191. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Hadi,S.M., Bickle,T.A. and Yuan,R. (1975) J. Biol. Chem., 250, 4159-4164. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Yuan,R., Heywood,J. and Meselson,M. (1972) Nature New Biol., 240, 42-43. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Endlich,B. and Linn,S. (1985) J. Biol. Chem., 260, 5720-5728. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Yuan,R., Hamilton,D.L. and Burckhardt,J. (1980) Cell, 20, 237-244. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Studier,F.W. and Bandyopadhyay,P.K. (1988) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 4677-4681. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Dreier,J., MacWilliams,M.P. and Bickle,T.A. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 264, 722-733. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Szczelkun,M.D., Dillingham,M.S., Janscak,P., Firman,K. and Halford,S.E. (1996) EMBO J., 15, 6335-6347. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Burckhardt,J., Weisemann,J. and Yuan,R. (1981) J. Biol. Chem., 256, 4024-4032. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Taylor,I., Patel,J., Firman,K. and Kneale,G.G. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 179-186. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Barcus,V.A., Titheradge,A.J.B. and Murray,N.E. (1995) Genetics, 140, 1187-1197. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Titheradge,A.J.B., Ternent,D. and Murray,N.E. (1996) Mol. Microbiol., 22, 437-447. MEDLINE Abstract

15. Firman,K., Creasey,W.A., Watson,G., Price,C. and Glover,S.W. (1983) Mol. Gen. Genet., 191, 145-153. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Hedges,R.W. and Datta,N. (1972) J. Gen. Microbiol., 71, 403-405. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Skrzypek,E. and Piekarowicz,A. (1989) Plasmid, 21, 195-204. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Meselson,M., Yuan,R. and Heywood,J. (1972) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 41, 447-462. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Dryden,D.T.F., Cooper,L.P. and Murray,N.E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268, 13228-13236.

20. Dryden,D.T.F., Cooper,L.P., Thorpe,P.H. and Byron,O. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 1065-1076.

21. Eskin,B. and Linn,S. (1972) J. Biol. Chem., 247, 6192-6196. MEDLINE Abstract

22. Suri,B., Shepherd,J.C.W. and Bickle,T.A. (1984) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 43, 1217-1221.

23. Janscak,P., Abadjieva,A. and Firman,K. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 257, 977-991. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Patel,J., Taylor,I., Dutta,C.F., Kneale,G.G. and Firman,K. (1992) Gene, 112, 21-27. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Boyer,H. (1964) J. Bacteriol., 88, 1652-1660.

26. Fuller-Pace,F.V., Cowan,G.M. and Murray,N.E. (1985) J. Mol. Biol., 186, 65-75. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Loenen,W.A.M., Daniel,A.S., Braymer,H.D. and Murray,N.E. (1987)J. Mol. Biol., 198, 159-170.

28. Prakash-Cheng,A. and Ryu,J. (1993) J. Bacteriol., 175, 4905-4906. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Prakash-Cheng,A., Chung,S.S. and Ryu,J. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet., 241, 491-496. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Suri,B. and Bickle,T.A. (1985) J. Mol. Biol., 186, 77-85. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Weiserova,M., Janscak,P., Benada,O., Hubacek,J., Zinkevich,V., Glover,S.W. and Firman,K. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 373-379. MEDLINE Abstract

32. Kulik,E.M. and Bickle,T.A. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 264, 891-906. MEDLINE Abstract

33. Makovets,S., Titheradge,A.J.B. and Murray,N.E. (1998) Mol. Microbiol., 28, 25-35. MEDLINE Abstract

34. Taylor,I., Watts,D. and Kneale,G. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4929-4935. MEDLINE Abstract

35. Boyer,H.W. and Roulland-Dussoix,D. (1969) J. Mol. Biol., 41, 459-472. MEDLINE Abstract

36. Maniatis,T., Fritsch,E.F. and Sambrook,J. (1982) Molecular Cloning:A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York.

37. Zinkevich,V., Popova,L., Kryukov,V., Abadjieva,A., Bogdarina,I., Janscak,P. and Firman,K. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 503-510. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Mernagh,D.R., Janscak,P., Firman,K. and Kneale,G.G. (1998) Biol. Chem., 379, 497-503. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1705 842059; Fax +44 1705 842053; Email: keith.firman@port.ac.uk
+Present address: Department of Microbiology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 Sep 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Sisakova, L. K. Stanley, M. Weiserova, and M. D. Szczelkun
A RecB-family nuclease motif in the Type I restriction endonuclease EcoR124I
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(12): 3939 - 3949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
J. Youell and K. Firman
EcoR124I: from Plasmid-Encoded Restriction-Modification System to Nanodevice
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2008; 72(2): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Sears and M. D. Szczelkun
Subunit assembly modulates the activities of the Type III restriction-modification enzyme PstII in vitro
Nucleic Acids Res., August 24, 2005; 33(15): 4788 - 4796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Jindrova, S. Schmid-Nuoffer, F. Hamburger, P. Janscak, and T. A. Bickle
On the DNA cleavage mechanism of Type I restriction enzymes
Nucleic Acids Res., March 23, 2005; 33(6): 1760 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. van Noort, T. van der Heijden, C. F. Dutta, K. Firman, and C. Dekker
Initiation of translocation by Type I restriction-modification enzymes is associated with a short DNA extrusion
Nucleic Acids Res., December 14, 2004; 32(22): 6540 - 6547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. A. M. Loenen
Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7059 - 7069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Marks, J. McGeehan, G. Wilson, N. Errington, and G. Kneale
Purification and characterisation of a novel DNA methyltransferase, M.AhdI
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2003; 31(11): 2803 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. T. F. Dryden, N. E. Murray, and D. N. Rao
Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2001; 29(18): 3728 - 3741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
N. E. Murray
Type I Restriction Systems: Sophisticated Molecular Machines (a Legacy of Bertani and Weigle)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2000; 64(2): 412 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Makovets, V. A. Doronina, and N. E. Murray
Regulation of endonuclease activity by proteolysis prevents breakage of unmodified bacterial chromosomes by type I restriction enzymes
PNAS, August 17, 1999; 96(17): 9757 - 9762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (118K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janscak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Firman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janscak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Firman, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?