| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
The use of tailed octamer primers for cycle sequencing
Acknowledgements
References
The use of tailed octamer primers for cycle sequencing
ABSTRACT
A number of analogues that behave indiscriminately in their base-pairing properties towards the natural DNA bases, while helping to stabilise the primer/template duplex, have been described. Ten different base analogues were tested: 3-nitropyrrole (4), 4-, 5- and 6-nitroindole (5), 5-fluoroindole, benzimidazole (6), 5-nitroindazole, hypoxanthine (which is often used as a universal base analogue; 7) and a 50:50 mixture of the degenerate bases P and K (8). Tails with up to 12 residues were tested in an attempt to stabilise the 8mers; the effect of each of these modifications has been examined in cycle sequencing reactions.
Initially we used an octamer primer comprising the eight terminal bases of the (-40) M13 universal primer (5[prime]-GTCACGAC) (9). This works reasonably well without any modification (Fig.
Of the 10 analogues tested, the most effective were 5-nitroindole and 5-nitroindazole. However, due to its ease of synthesis, 2[prime]-deoxyribosyl-5-nitroindole was preferred. Full details of the other analogues used will be reported elsewhere. Of the other analogues, the only two that gave any sequence data were 3-nitropyrrole and benzimidazole, though they were much less effective than 5-nitroindole. The 5-nitroindole tails were expected to stabilise the primers while behaving indiscriminately in base-pairing (5,10). Longer tails (>6 residues) were detrimental; they may loop back on themselves, destabilising the primer. Previous work has shown that runs of 5-nitroindole residues can form secondary structures, such as hairpins (11,12), due to self-stacking. Short tails, on the other hand, might increase duplex stability by intercalation. A tail of three 5-nitroindole residues improved the intensity of the sequence data compared to the control primer lacking a tail, at an annealing temperature of 30°C (Fig.
To determine the optimum length of the 5[prime]-tail, primers containing one to five 5-nitroindole residues were tested in cycle sequencing reactions, and compared to the control octamer itself. An annealing temperature of 30°C was used and the signal intensities for each reaction are shown in Table 1. These results suggest that the optimum length for the 5-nitroindole tail is four residues.
To determine whether this effect was generally applicable, a further seven octamers were tested both with and without 5[prime]-tails of 5-nitroindole. As in our initial study, we used primers with three 5-nitroindole residues, although improved data may be obtained with four (see example in Table 1). These results are also summarised in Table 1. All the tailed primers produced good sequence data, as shown by the signal intensity data. In particular, in two cases (primers 2 and 5), the addition of a tail proved essential for obtaining sequence data. In all but one case (primer 4), addition of a tail increased the signal intensity. The increased signal intensity (an arbitrary photomultiplier output measurement) improved base calling as measured by the number of `Ns' and, therefore, the amount of useful data.
Table 1.
| Primer | Sequences | G | A | T | C |
| Universal | GTCACGAC | 168 | 154 | 136 | 143 |
| 5GTCACGAC | 197 | 195 | 186 | 183 | |
| 55GTCACGAC | 237 | 226 | 244 | 219 | |
| 555GTCACGAC | 240 | 256 | 244 | 236 | |
| 5555GTCACGAC | 291 | 223 | 262 | 264 | |
| 55555GTCACGAC | 277 | 238 | 253 | 244 | |
| 1 | GGAAGCCC | 301 | 344 | 352 | 248 |
| 555GGAAGCCC | 395 | 421 | 673 | 374 | |
| 2 | AAATCCGC | 43 | 64 | 82 | 53 |
| 555AAATCCGC | 235 | 356 | 225 | 221 | |
| 3 | TTCAGCGG | 115 | 218 | 150 | 103 |
| 555TTCAGCGG | 268 | 524 | 367 | 240 | |
| 4 | AAGTGCCG | 236 | 397 | 219 | 201 |
| 555AAGTGCCG | 201 | 317 | 181 | 192 | |
| 5 | AACGAGCG | 106 | 223 | 152 | 91 |
| 555AACGAGCG | 128 | 337 | 196 | 116 | |
| 6 | CGCTGGTT | - | - | - | - |
| 555CGCTGGTT | 70 | 131 | 63 | 62 | |
| 7 | GCGGTTTG | 222 | 174 | 78 | 63 |
| 555GCGGTTTG | 155 | 223 | 146 | 146 |
A universal library of primers would accelerate DNA sequencing by primer walking. However, huge numbers of oligomers (48 or 65 536 octamers, for example) would be needed unless a sample of the complete library could suffice. Two complementary approaches to reducing the number of primers are discussed here. The first approach is to calculate the probability of finding an octamer, present in a sample of the complete library, within a given distance from the end of a sequence run. The model assumes that each of the four bases have an equal probability of being found at any position. A full account of these calculations is provided as Supplementary Material. This shows that in a library of only 1500 octamer primers, there is a 90% probability of finding an appropriate primer within 99 bases of the end of the previous sequence read, a 99% probability within 198 bases and a 99.9% probability within 297 bases. Although this smaller library can result in long overlaps, this increased redundancy should improve the accuracy of the final sequence. Modification by 5-nitroindole does not increase the size of the primer library.
The second approach exploits the non-randomness of real DNA sequences to choose which primers to include in the library. This approach is based on previous analyses of model organisms by others (13-15). In effect, guesses are made, based on known oligonucleotide frequencies, as to which sequences are likely to be present in the material to be sequenced. Natural DNA sequences are non-random; it has long been appreciated that GC compositions vary widely. This skew from randomness is increased as longer sequences are considered. Thus dinucleotide and trinucleotide frequencies deviate from the values expected based on base composition (15). Markov chain analyses, performed some years ago (13-15), examined the skewed distribution of oligomer frequencies in Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster. A pertinent feature of the Drosophila analysis was the table of 50 nonamers (Table 6 in 15). Each of these nonamers was predicted to be present in 50% of cosmid clones from that organism. Thus, a library of the most frequent octamers in human coding sequences, for example, could be used for completing EST sequences.
Figure 1. Sequence traces obtained using either (a) the control primer (5[prime]-GTCACGAC) or (b) the 5-nitroindole (denoted as 5) tailed primer (5[prime]-555GTCACGAC). Note the increased signal intensities in (a) compared to (b). Sequencing was performed using ThermoSequenase[trade] dye-terminators and samples were run on an ABI 373 fluorescent sequencer. The concentration of each primer was 25 pmol; the template used was 1 µg of caesium chloride purified single-stranded M13mp8 DNA. Thermal cycling conditions used were: 95°C for 5 min followed by 25 cycles of: 95°C for 30 s, annealing for 15 s at 30°C, extension at 60°C for 4 min. In conclusion, the addition of a 5[prime]-tail of the universal base 5-nitroindole stabilises short (octamer) primers; this improves both the quality of sequence data produced, and the fraction of octamers that can be used, in cycle sequencing. 5-nitroindole was found to be the best of the 10 analogues investigated by us, and the optimum tail length was shown to be four. Further development of these findings should expedite primer walking.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Richard Grenfell and Jan Fogg for oligonucleotide synthesis, and Nycomed Amersham plc for financial support (to D.L.).
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 3 Nov 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Gallego and D. Loakes
Solution structure and dynamics of DNA duplexes containing the universal base analogues 5-nitroindole and 5-nitroindole 3-carboxamide
Nucleic Acids Res.,
May 14, 2007;
35(9):
2904 - 2912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. M. Lage, J. H. Leamon, T. Pejovic, S. Hamann, M. Lacey, D. Dillon, R. Segraves, B. Vossbrinck, A. Gonzalez, D. Pinkel, et al.
Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array-CGH
Genome Res.,
February 1, 2003;
13(2):
294 - 307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. Loakes
SURVEY AND SUMMARY: The applications of universal DNA base analogues
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 15, 2001;
29(12):
2437 - 2447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Kraltcheva and S. Hardin
Octamer-primed sequencing technology: effects of dNTP supplementation
Nucleic Acids Res.,
May 15, 2001;
29(10):
e48 - e48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. A. Klewer, A. Hoskins, P. Zhang, V. J. Davisson, D. E. Bergstrom, and A. C. LiWang
NMR structure of a DNA duplex containing nucleoside analog 1-(2'-deoxy-{beta}-D-ribofuranosyl)-3-nitropyrrole and the structure of the unmodified control
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 15, 2000;
28(22):
4514 - 4522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Print PDF (158K)
![]()
Supplementary Data
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Ball, S.
![]()
Articles by Loakes, D.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Ball, S.
![]()
Articles by Loakes, D.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?