| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
Direct probing: covalent attachment of probe DNA to double-stranded target DNA
Introduction
Materials And Methods
Deoxyoligonucleotide probes
DNA purification
Direct probing
Results
Principle of the procedure
Direct probing
Probing by various hairpin probes
Probing a specific sequence in genomic DNA
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Direct probing: covalent attachment of probe DNA to double-stranded target DNA
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Since bases are paired inwardly in double-stranded DNA molecules, recognition of the specific base sequences that are required in fundamental cellular processes such as replication, repair, recombination and transcription is mediated by enzymes specific to these processes. This enzymatic recognition is considered to be very accurate and extremely efficient. On the other hand, recognition of specific base sequences in most molecular biological experiments is carried out with single-stranded DNA molecules after dissociation of double-stranded DNA in order to expose base sequences. DNA-DNA hybridization, one of the most reliable techniques for recognition and also quantification of specific base sequences in a complex genome, has been used widely for the analysis of DNA, often complementing PCR, which excels in convenience and sensitivity. The current methods of base recognition with single-stranded DNA as in DNA-DNA hybridization, however, are quite cumbersome and time consuming as they require DNA dissociation, transfer of the dissociated DNA to membranes, lengthy incubation for hybridization and subsequent extensive washing of the membranes to remove non-specific DNA. Direct recognition of specific base sequences in double-stranded DNA molecules without DNA dissociation, once established, would greatly simplify most of the current procedures for recognition of specific base sequences by DNA-DNA hybridization.
One way to approach the direct recognition of base sequences is to make use of triplex DNA formation. At present, the only triplex DNA structures stable enough for most practical purposes are those formed through Hoogsteen base pairing (1). In this case, however, the target base sequences are limited to polypurine and polypyrimidine (2-4), thus making it quite impractical to utilize this method as a general means for direct probing or cloning of double-stranded DNA. On the other hand, it has long been established that recA protein, probably the most extensively investigated recombination enzyme, recognizes base sequences in double-stranded DNA and mediates a reaction in which one of the target double-stranded DNA strands is displaced by incoming homologous single-stranded DNA (5-8). The newly paired DNA in the displaced region, however, is not stable enough to withstand manipulations employed for most gene analysis, particularly when recA protein is removed and strands are displaced by short deoxyoligonucleotides (9).
Employing hairpin-like oligonucleotide probes and with successive use of recA protein and DNA ligase, we have been able to demonstrate that deoxyoligonucleotide probes can be covalently attached to target double-stranded DNA molecules without dissociation of DNA. In this article, we present the principles and basic characteristics of the procedure and the actual results of direct probing of specific DNA fragments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Deoxyoligonucleotide probes
The deoxyoligonucleotide probes were custom synthesized by Kurabo Co. (Osaka) and Sawady technology (Tokyo). The sequences are listed below, in which the hairpin sequence (underlined) and mismatched bases (bold) are emphasized. TRI-20-63, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATCCGTAAGATGCTTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-62, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATCCGTAAGATGCTTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCG-3[prime]; TRI-20-64, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATCCGTAAGATGCTTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGCG-3[prime]; TRI-20-50, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATCCGTAAGATGCTTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGG-3[prime]; TRI-10-63, 5[prime]-ATCCGGTAACTATCGTCTTGAGTCCAACCCGGTAAGACACGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-63M1, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATCCGTAAGATGATTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-63M2, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATACGTAAGATGATTTTCTGTGACTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-63M3, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATACGTAAGATGATTTTCTGTGCCTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-63M4, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATACGTACGATGATTTTCTGTGCCTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-20-63M5, 5[prime]-GTCATGCCATACGTACGATGATTTTATGTGCCTGGTGAGTGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-21-63, 5[prime]-GTTATCCACAGAATCAGGGGATAACGCAGGAAAGAACATGGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-22-63, 5[prime]-TCCAACCCGGTAAGACACGACTTATCGCCACTGGCAGCAGGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; TRI-PA20-63, 5[prime]-GCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGCACTCACCAGTCACAGAAAAGCATCTTACGGATGGCATGAC-3[prime]; FTZ-1-63, 5[prime]-CCTACGGTGCCCAGGACATTTTGGGCACAAGGACGAGTGCGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; P53-1-63, 5[prime]-CAAGATGTTTTGCCAACTGGCCAAGACCTGCCCTGTGCAGGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime]; P53-3-63, 5[prime]-GGGTTGGGGTCGGGGTGGTGGCCTGCCCTTCCAATGGATCGCGGCCGCGGTTTCCGCGGCCGC-3[prime].
DNA purification
pBluescript DNA was extracted by alkaline procedure (10) from Escherichia coli (XL1-Blue) which had been cultured in Terrific broth (10) containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml). DNA in the alkaline supernatant was further purified by CsCl centrifugation(85 000 r.p.m. for 16 h), which was followed by Sephacryl S-400 chromatography after dialysis against TE buffer. The DNA was then treated with phenol and chloroform, then precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer at a DNA concentration of 200 µg/ml. Drosophila and human DNA were purchased from Promega.
Direct probing
For direct probing of pBluescript DNA, deoxyoligonucleotide probes (5 ng) labeled at the 5[prime]-terminus with 32P using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Megalabel; Takara) were incubated in a reaction mixture (5 µl) which contained recA protein (0.48 µg; Epicentre Technologies or Pharmacia Biotech), ATP-[gamma]-S (4.8 mM; Sigma), magnesium acetate (2.5 mM) and Tris-acetate (30 mM, pH 7.2), for 15 min at 37°C. A ScaI digest of double-stranded DNA (100 ng, pBluescript DNA; Stratagene) in a buffer (5 µl) containing magnesium acetate (22.5 mM), ATP-[gamma]-S (4.8 mM) and Tris-acetate (30 mM) was then added and incubated for another 30 min. Heat-stable DNA ligase (20 U, Ampligase; Epicentre Technologies) in 10 µl of a buffer (10× RXN buffer diluted 5-fold with redistilled water, provided by the supplier) was then added and the reaction mixture was incubated for 15 min at 65°C. The reaction was terminated by adding 1.8 µl of EDTA (110 mM)/SDS (5.6%) solution, which was followed by incubation for 15 min at 37°C after addition of proteinase K (1 µl, 20 mg/ml). DNA was precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer (10 µl). The samples were then subjected to neutral or alkaline (0.05 M NaOH, 1 mM EDTA) agarose gel (0.8%) electrophoresis (120 V, 2 h or 20 V, 5 h, respectively), the gels stained with ethidium bromide and autoradiographed (5 h at -80°C) using Fuji X-ray film (RX).
For probing of specific DNA fragments in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) or human genomes, higher concentrations of probes, target DNA and recA (25 ng, 20 µg and 7.84 µg, respectively) were employed and excess unreacted labeled oligonucleotide probes were removed before electrophoresis through a Sephacryl S-400 spin column to reduce background noise (legend to Fig.
RESULTS
Principle of the procedure
The procedure is outlined diagrammatically in Figure
Figure 1. Diagrammatic outline of direct probing of specific base sequences in double-stranded DNA by hairpin-like oligonucleotide probes. Target DNA and deoxyoligonucleotide probe are shown in blue and red, respectively. Conversion between the two structures (III and IV) is highly speculative and therefore IV is shown in parentheses. In Figure Figure 2. Direct probing of pBluescript DNA: effects of recA protein and DNA ligase. A deoxyoligonucleotide probe (TRI-20-63, 5 ng) labeled at the 5[prime]-terminus with 32P by T4 polynucleotide kinase (Megalabel; Takara) was incubated in a reaction mixture (5 µl) which contained recA protein (0.48 µg; Pharmacia Biotech), ATP-[gamma]-S (4.8 mM; Sigma), magnesium acetate (2.5 mM) and Tris-acetate (30 mM, pH 7.2), for 15 min at 37°C. A ScaI digest of double-stranded DNA (100 ng, pBluescript DNA; Stratagene) in a buffer (5 µl) containing ATP-[gamma]-S (4.8 mM), magnesium acetate (22.5 mM) and Tris-acetate (30 mM) was then added and further incubated for another 30 min. Heat-stable DNA ligase (20 U, Ampligase; Epicentre Technologies) in 10 µl of a buffer (10× RXN buffer diluted 5-fold with redistilled water) provided by the supplier was then added and the reaction mixture was incubated for 15 min at 65°C. The reaction was terminated by adding 1.8 µl of EDTA (110 mM)/SDS (5.6%) solution which was followed by incubation for 15 min at 37°C after addition of proteinase K (1 µl, 20 mg/ml). DNA was precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer (10 µl). The samples were then subjected to neutral or alkaline (0.05 M NaOH, 1 mM EDTA) agarose gel (0.8%) electrophoresis (120 V, 2 h or 20 V, 5 h, respectively), the gels stained with ethidium bromide and autoradiographed (5 h at -80°C) using Fuji X-ray film (RX). (A) Autoradiographic patterns after neutral agarose gel electrophoresis. (B) Autoradiographic patterns after alkaline agarose gel electrophoresis. (C) Ethidium bromide staining patterns after neutral agarose gel electrophoresis. (A-C) Lane 1, without recA protein and DNA ligase; lane 2, without DNA ligase; lane 3, without recA protein; lane 4; control (complete); lane M, DNA size markers([lambda] HindIII digests) with their approximate molecular sizes in kb. Details in Materials and Methods. Figure Figure 3. Direct probing of pBluescript DNA with various deoxyoligonucleotide probes. 32P-labeled deoxyoligonucleotide probes (sequences below and in Materials and Methods) were incubated with recA protein (0.48 µg), further incubated with restriction enzyme (ScaI or EcoRV)-digested or dephosphorylated pBluescript DNA (100 ng) and subjected to ligation with ligase as described in the legend to Figure 2. After termination of the reaction and proteinase K treatment, samples were electrophoresed (neutral) and autoradiographed. The following combinations of probe and target DNA were employed. Lane 1, TRI-20-63 (probe) and ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (target); lane 2, TRI-20-63 (probe) and ScaI-digested and alkaline phosphatase-treated pBluescript DNA (target); lane 3, TRI-20-62 (probe) and ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (target); lane 4, TRI-20-64 (probe) and ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (target); lane 5, TRI-20-50 (probe) and ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (target); lane 6, TRI-10-63 (probe) and ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (target); lane 7, TRI-20-63 (probe) and EcoRV-digested pBluescript DNA (target). For alkaline phosphatase treatment (lane 2), a ScaI digest of pBluescript DNA (5 µg) was treated with bacterial alkaline phosphatase (0.45 U; Toyobo) for 16 h at 37°C in a reaction mixture as suggested by the manufacturer. After treating the mixture with phenol, DNA was precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer at a concentration of 200 µg/ml. DNA size markers ([lambda] HindIII digests) are shown in lane M with their approximate molecular sizes in kb. Details in Materials and Methods. In a separate series of experiments, fidelity of the recA protein-mediated reaction in recognizing homologous sequences in target DNA was examined using hairpin probes with varying numbers of mismatched bases. As seen in Figure Figure 4. Effect of mismatched bases on direct probing. ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA was probed with 32P-labeled deoxyoligonucleotides with increasing numbers of mismatched bases (sequences in Materials and Methods) as described in the legend to Figure 2 except that unreacted probes were removed by a Sephacryl S-400 column before ethanol precipitation. Lane 1, control probe (TRI-20-63); lane 2, one base mismatched probe (TRI-20-63M1); lane 3, two base mismatched probe (TRI-20-63M2); lane 4, three base mismatched probe (TRI-20-63M3); lane 5, four base mismatched probe (TRI-20-63M4); lane 6, five base mismatched probe (TRI-20-63M5). DNA size markers ([lambda] HindIII digests) are shown in lane M with their approximate molecular size in kb. Details in Materials and Methods. In the model experiments described above, we employed target DNA with blunt ends (ScaI-treated Bluescript DNA). As seen in Figure Figure 5. Direct probing of double-stranded target DNA carrying different terminal structures. pBluescript DNA was digested with AflIII, ScaI or AlwNI which produces DNA fragments with 5[prime] protruding (four bases), blunt and 3[prime] protruding (three bases) termini, respectively. Each digest was probed by 32P-labeled deoxyoligonucleotide probes, TRI-21-63 for AflIII digest, TRI-20-63 for ScaI digest and TRI-22-63 for AlwNI digest, as described in the legend to Figure 2 except that unreacted probes were removed by a Sephacryl S-400 column before ethanol precipitation. Probe sequences in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, AflIII digest probed by TRI-21-63; lane 2, ScaI digest probed by TRI-20-63; lane 3, AlwNI digest probed by TRI-22-63. DNA size markers ([lambda] HindIII digests) are shown in lane M with their approximate molecular size in kb. Details in Materials and Methods. Next, probing the complementary sequence of the opposite strand at the same terminus was examined. As seen in Figure Figure 6. Direct probing of sequences of the opposite strand at the same terminus. 32P-labeled deoxyoligonucleotide probes, TRI-20-63 and TRI-PA20-63, which carry the complementary sequences of the opposite strand of terminal sequences probed by TRI-20-63 (sequence in Materials and Methods), were incubated with recA protein (0.48 µg), further incubated with ScaI-digested pBluescript DNA (100 ng) and subjected to ligation and electrophoresis as described in the legend to Figure 2 except that unreacted probes were removed by a Sephacryl S-400 column before ethanol precipitation. Lane 1, probed by TRI-20-63; lane 2, probed by TRI-PA20-63. DNA size markers ([lambda] HindIII digests) are shown in lane M with their approximate molecular size in kb. Details in Materials and Methods. Figure 7. Direct probing of genes in Drosophila (ftz) and human (p53) genomes. (A) Drosophila melanogaster DNA (Promega) was digested with FspI (47 U; NEB) or EcoRV (48 U; Toyobo) for 16 h at 37°C in a 200 µl reaction mixture as described in the manufacturer's instructions. After phenol extraction, DNA was precipitated with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) at a concentration of 4 µg/µl. The DNA (20 µg; Promega) was incubated with 25 ng of a 32P-labeled hairpin probe (FTZ-1-63, sequence in Materials and Methods) for the FspI fragment of the ftz gene (11) which had been incubated with recA protein (7.84 µg). The sample was subjected to a ligation reaction with Ampligase, as described in the legend to Figure 2 except that the ligation was performed for 16 h at 55°C. After termination of the reaction and proteinase K treatment (legend to Fig. 2), unreacted probe was removed by a Sephacryl S-400 column. The samples (concentrated to 20 µl) were then electrophoresed (neutral) and autoradiographed (legend to Fig. 2). (Left) Lane 1, FspI-digested DNA; lane 2, EcoRV-digested DNA. The position of the band is indicated by an arrow. (Right) Ethidium bromide staining pattern after electrophoresis. (B) Human DNA (Promega) was digested with BamHI (30 U; NEB) and PvuII (30 U; NEB) or EcoRV (30 U; NEB) for 16 h at 37°C in a 200 µl reaction mixture and purified as described above. The BamHI and PvuII double-digested or EcoRV-digested DNA (20 µg, Promega) was subjected to direct probing as was the FspI fragment in Drosophila DNA (above) except that (i) two labeled hairpin probes (25 ng each) in which the 40mer sequences are complementary to the 3[prime]-terminal (P53-1-63) and 5[prime]-terminal sequence (P53-3-63) of the p53 fragment were used simultaneously, (ii) the ligase reaction was performed at 60°C and (iii) unreacted labeled oligonucleotides were removed by three repeated spin columns before electrophoresis to reduce background noise. (Left) Lane 1. BamHI and PvuII double-digested DNA; lane 2, EcoRV-digested DNA. The position of the band is indicated by an arrow. (Right) Ethidium bromide staining pattern after electrophoresis. Details in Materials and Methods. It should be noted that despite many attempts we failed to covalently attach the hairpin probe to the termini of complementary single-stranded DNA after conventional hybridization of probe to target DNA. The reason for the difficulty in ligating the probe to single-stranded DNA and not to double-stranded DNA as described above is not fully understood at the present time but is currently under investigation. We examined whether a specific sequence in genomic DNA can be directly probed by hairpin probes. First, one of the homeobox genes (fushi tarazu, ftz) in D.melanogaster (11), which is present as a single copy in a genome of ~180 Mb, was subjected to this investigation. Whole Drosophila genomic DNA was digested with FspI, which produces a 1753 bp ftz gene fragment, and the digest was subjected to direct probing using a hairpin probe (FTZ-1-63) in which a 40mer sequence is complementary to the 3[prime]-terminal sequence of the FspI fragment. As seen in Figure Similar experiments were performed to probe a single copy DNA fragment (p53 gene) in the human genome (~3000 Mb), which is 17 times more complex than the Drosophila genome. Human genomic DNA was digested with BamHI and PvuII, which produces a 1312 bp p53 gene fragment (12), and the digest was subjected to direct simultaneous probing with two hairpin probes in which the respective 40mer sequences are complementary to the 3[prime]-terminal (P53-1-63) and 5[prime]- terminal sequences (P53-3-63) of the p53 fragment. As seen in Figure In this paper we have described a novel procedure which can be applied to probing of specific DNA sequences. By employing a hairpin-like probe, it has become possible to covalently attach probe DNA directly to double-stranded target DNA. Elimination of DNA dissociation and subsequent hybridization (and washing) have made the entire process of probing streamlined and efficient, achievable within a fraction of the time required for similar procedures currently in use such as Southern hybridization, while maintaining high probing efficiency. In addition, direct probing has proven to have other more specific advantages over conventional procedures. For example, when one probes a single sample with multiple probes, repeated hybridization (rehybridization) is no longer necessary as probing can be carried out simultaneously in separate tubes for separate probes and samples can be electrophoresed in parallel. This may be particularly advantageous in non-PCR-based polymorphism analysis using multiple probes. Our novel procedure makes it easier to detect a single copy DNA fragment in highly complex genomes using oligonucleotide probes than with current procedures, as shown above in probing the human p53 gene fragment. We attributed this to (i) the high efficiency of recA protein in finding complementary sequences and (ii) removal of unreacted labeled probes before electrophoresis, both of which are unique to this procedure. In the procedure described, base sequences located at the terminus of the target DNA are recognized and only sequences in that region can be probed. Because of this feature, ambiguous hybridization products derived from illegitimate hybridization with similar but not identical sequences at other locations, which are often encountered in current procedures and require re-examination by other means, should essentially be eliminated. On the other hand, since only sequences at the termini of restriction fragments can be recognized, one may encounter problems when sequences to be recognized cannot be placed at the termini for some reason or when the exact location of the sequence is not known. The unique characteristics of the reported procedure seem to have virtually eliminated the anticipated obstacles for construction of fully automated probing equipment, which has yet to be realized despite a great potential need. Needless to say, this procedure could be exploited even more effectively by combining it with other molecular biological techniques such as PCR, depending upon the purposes of the experiments involved. We thank Drs Y. Shigemori, K. Okumura and T. Yamamoto for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by the R & D Project of the Innovative Technology for the Earth Program which is sponsored by NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization).
Direct probing
Probing by various hairpin probes
Probing a specific sequence in genomic DNA
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 3 Dec 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
Y. Shigemori and M. Oishi
Stable Triple-Stranded DNA Formation and its Application to the SNP Detection
DNA Res,
January 1, 2005;
12(6):
441 - 449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
Y. Shigemori, H. Haruta, T. Okada, and M. Oishi
Marking of specific sequences in double-stranded DNA molecules--SNP detection and direct observation
Genome Res.,
December 1, 2004;
14(12):
2478 - 2485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Print PDF (198K)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Fujiwara, J.
![]()
Articles by Oishi, M.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Fujiwara, J.
![]()
Articles by Oishi, M.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?