Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (185K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pederson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pederson, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 756-760


A 7-methylguanosine cap commits U3 and U8 small nuclear RNAs to the nucleolar localization pathway
Introduction
Materials And Methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References


A 7-methylguanosine cap commits U3 and U8 small nuclear RNAs to the nucleolar localization pathway

A 7-methylguanosine cap commits U3 and U8 small nuclear RNAs to the nucleolar localization pathway Marty R. Jacobson+ and Thoru Pederson*

Cell Biology Group, Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

Received October 17, 1997; Revised and Accepted December 3, 1997

ABSTRACT

U3 and U8 small nucleolar RNAs (snRNAs) participate in pre-rRNA processing. Like the U1, U2, U4 and U5 major spliceosomal snRNAs, U3 and U8 RNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and their initial 7-methylguanosine (m7G) 5' cap structures subsequently become converted to 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine. However, unlike the polymerase II transcribed spliceosomal snRNAs, which are exported to the cytoplasm for cap hypermethylation, U3 and U8 RNAs undergo cap hypermethylation within the nucleus. Human U3 and U8 RNAs with various cap structures were generated by in vitro transcription, fluorescently labeled and microinjected into nuclei of normal rat kidney (NRK) epithelial cells. When U3 and U8 RNAs containing a m7G cap were microinjected they became extensively localized in nucleoli. U3 and U8 RNAs containing alternative cap structures did not localize in nucleoli nor did U3 or U8 RNAs containing triphosphate 5'-termini. The nucleolar localization of m7G-capped U3 RNA was competed by co-microinjection into the nucleus of a 100-fold molar excess of dinucleotide m7GpppG but not by a 100-fold excess of ApppG dinucleotide. Although it was obviously not possible to assess formation of di- and trimethylguanosine caps on the microinjected U3 and U8 RNAs in these single cell experiments, these results indicate that the initial presence of a m7G cap on U3 and U8 RNAs, most likely together with internal sequence elements, commits these transcripts to the nucleolar localization pathway and point to diverse roles of the m7G cap in the intracellular traffic of various RNAs transcribed by RNA polymerase II.

INTRODUCTION

The spatial segregation of individual species of RNA to their correct destinations in the cell constitutes a key element in eukaryotic gene expression that has only recently begun to be understood. Certain messenger RNAs have been shown to have non-uniform distributions within the cytoplasm and in several cases this has been linked to sequence elements in the mRNA 3'-untranslated region (1-4). In the nucleus pre-mRNAs are thought to be tethered in place by virtue of physical associations among elements of the transcriptional, polyadenylation and splicing machinery (5-13), followed by rapid nuclear export once processing is completed. In the case of the small nucleolar RNA (snRNA) species RNase MRP RNA we have shown that a discrete sequence element near the 5'-end is necessary and sufficient for localization in the nucleolus (14). We have also identified specific nucleotide sequences involved in intranuclear localization of the RNA subunit of RNase P (15). It is not known whether various intracellular RNA localization events are based on direct affinity between distinct RNA sequence elements and fixed intracellular sites or, alternatively, a prior binding of key proteins to specific RNA sequences with the resulting ribonucleoprotein structure constituting the high affinity `ligand' for particular loci in the cell (see for example 14-16).

U3 and U8 snRNAs are members of a family of RNAs that are defined by their nucleolar localization and association with the nucleolar protein fibrillarin. Both U3 and U8 RNAs are essential for pre-rRNA processing (17-22). Like the spliceosomal snRNAs U1, U2, U4 and U5, the snRNAs U3 and U8 are transcribed by RNA polymerase II with typical 7-methylguanosine (m7G) 5' cap structures, which subsequently become hypermethylated to 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (23-25). Here we report that nucleolar localization of U3 and U8 RNAs in mammalian cells is dependent on the specific nature of their 5' cap structure and that excess dinucleotide m7GpppG specifically competes nucleolar localization of m7G-capped U3 RNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human U3 RNA was transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase from HincII-linearized pHU3.1, the detailed construction of which has been previously described (15). Human U8 RNA was transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase from XbaI-linearized pSPU8, provided by Joan Steitz (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine). The transcription conditions and fluorescent labeling of RNA were as described previously (14,15,26,27). Transcription reactions were carried out in the presence or absence of 1 mM m7G(5')ppp(5')G, G(5')ppp(5')G, A(5')ppp(5')G or m7G(5')ppp(5')A (all obtained from New England Biolabs Inc., Beverly, MA); the concentrations of the four ribonucleoside triphosphates in the transcription reactions were each 1 mM. RNAs were either column purified or gel purified prior to microinjection into the nucleus of NRK fibroblasts (14,15,26). All microinjection experiments were carried out with sub-confluent cultures of growing NRK cells set up in special chambers in which the temperature and CO2 level were precisely maintained during the period of observation (26). For competition experiments on U3 RNA nucleolar localization dinucleotide m7GpppG or dinucleotide ApppG was mixed at a 100-fold molar excess with m7G-capped rhodamine-labeled U3 RNA prior to nucleus microinjection. Microinjection of excess cap dinucleotides had no apparent effect on cell viability, as determined by phase contrast microscopy at various times (up to 1 h) after microinjection.


Figure 1. Nucleolar localization of m7G-capped U3 RNA. Human U3 RNA was transcribed in the presence of m7G(5')ppp(5')G and 5-(3-aminoallyl)UTP followed by rhodamine labeling, purification and microinjection into the nuclei of NRK epithelial cells (see Materials and Methods). Three representative cells are shown. (A, C and E) Phase contrast images ~1 min after microinjection. (B, D and F) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 20 s after microinjection; (D) 30 s after microinjection; (F) 2 min after microinjection.

RESULTS

When human U3 RNA transcribed with a m7G cap was microinjected into the nucleus a substantial fraction underwent very rapid nucleolar localization (Fig. 1). At the earliest post-microinjection time point it is feasible to record (~20-30 s) the majority of U3 RNA already displayed extensive nucleolar localization (Fig. 1B and D). In general each nucleolus within a given nucleus displayed approximately similar levels of fluorescent U3 RNA, although occasionally there was some nucleolus-to-nucleolus variation within a particular nucleus (as is evident in the nuclei shown in Fig. 1D and F).

Because the first transcribed nucleotide from the T7 promoter-U3 gene construct is G, the m7G(5')ppp(5')G cap can be incorporated in both orientations during transcription by T7 RNA polymerase (28). We therefore employed the cap analog A(5')ppp(5')G, which can only be incorporated with the A as the U3 RNA ultimate 5' nucleotide. In contrast to m7G(5')ppp(5')G-capped U3 RNA (Fig. 1), U3 RNA containing the A(5')ppp(5')G cap did not display appreciable nuclear localization over a period of 9 min (Fig. 2B-D). However, a small degree of nucleolar localization was observed at 21 min after microinjection when the image was deliberately contrast enhanced (Fig. 2F). We also used the cap analog m7G(5')ppp(5')A, which can only be incorporated into U3 RNA by T7 RNA polymerase in the orientation 5'-A(5')ppp(5')G7m...3'. As shown in Figure 3, U3 RNA containing this cap displayed a low level of nucleolar localization that was evident 11 min after microinjection (Fig. 3C). The fact that a small amount of this U3 RNA carrying a 7-methylG as the cap internal nucleotide displayed some nucleolar localization probably reflects the contribution, in a minor fraction of the RNA molecules, of the 7-methylG even in this (perhaps sterically hindered) position. As shown in Figure 4, U3 RNA with no 5' cap (i.e. containing a 5' triphosphate end) displayed no appreciable nucleolar localization (Fig. 4B and C).


Figure 2. (5')Appp(5')G-capped U3 RNA. (A) Phase contrast image immediately after microinjection. (B-D) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 1 min after microinjection; (C) 3 min after microinjection; (D) 7 min after microinjection. (E) Phase contrast image 20 min after microinjection. (F) Fluorescence micrograph 21 min after microinjection. The image in (F) was contrast enhanced using Adobe Photoshop V.4.0 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San José, CA).


Figure 3. A(5')ppp(5')Gm7-capped U3 RNA. (A) Phase contrast image. (B and C) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 5 min after microinjection; (C) 11 min after microinjection. The small, bright fluorescent spots in (B) and (C) are at or near the microinjection site. They were not coincident with nucleoli nor were they observed consistently. (This also applies to the small, bright spots in Fig. 4B and C and Fig. 6B and C.)


Figure 4. U3 RNA containing a triphosphate 5'-end. (A) Phase contrast image. (B and C) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 9 min after microinjection; (C) 14 min after microinjection.

We next asked whether this 5' cap structure-dependent nucleolar localization of U3 RNA was the case also for U8 snRNA, another nucleolar RNA that is involved in pre-rRNA processing (20,22) and, like U3, binds the nucleolar protein fibrillarin (29). As shown in Figure 5B-D, U8 RNA containing a m7G(5')ppp(5')G cap displayed nucleolar localization, although this took place somewhat more slowly than in the case of U3 RNA. The cell shown in Figure 5A was binucleate and the two nuclei were closely juxtaposed. Interestingly, a small amount of the microinjected U8 RNA moved into the other nucleus and there, too, displayed nucleolar localization (Fig. 5B and C). U8 RNA containing the non-methylated cap G(5')ppp(5')G did not become localized in nucleoli (Fig. 6) nor did non-capped U8 RNA containing a triphosphate 5'-end (Fig. 7). We also attempted to investigate the intranuclear behavior of U3 and U8 RNA containing a 5' trimethylguanosine cap structure, but the m2,2,7G(5')ppp(5')G preparation we employed was not appreciably incorporated during transcription of U3 or U8 RNA by T7 RNA polymerase (M.R.Jacobson and T.Pederson, unpublished results).


Figure 5. Nucleolar localization of m7G(5')ppp(5')G-capped U8 RNA. (A) Phase contrast image. (B-D) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 4 min after microinjection; (C) 9 min after microinjection; (D) 25 min after microinjection.


Figure 6. G(5')ppp(5')G-capped U8 RNA. (A) Phase contrast image. (B and C) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 2 min after microinjection; (C) 6 min after microinjection.

To further investigate the m7G cap dependence of U3 RNA nucleolar localization competition experiments were carried out in which an excess of the cap dinucleotide m7G(5')ppp(5')G or the cap analog dinucleotide A(5')ppp(5')G was co-microinjected into the nucleus together with fluorescent m7G-capped U3 RNA. As shown in Figure 8, the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of m7G(5')ppp(5')G prevented nucleolar localization of fluorescent U3 RNA (Fig. 8B), whereas the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of A(5')ppp(5')G did not (Fig. 8D).

DISCUSSION

Ever since they were discovered (30,31) the m2,2,7G cap structures on the 5'-ends of snRNAs have remained enigmatic as regards function. We previously speculated (32) that the trimethylguanosine caps might serve to keep the cytoplasmic precursors of U1, U2, U4 and U5 RNAs from associating with the translational machinery, with which they might otherwise become engaged if bearing m7G caps like most mRNAs. However, the subsequent findings that synthetic mRNAs containing m2,2,7G caps are capable of translation (33) and that trans-spliced mRNAs contain m2,2,7G caps (34,35) makes it very unlikely that the m2,2,7G caps on U1, U2, U4 and U5 pre-snRNAs are designed to keep them from interacting with the translational apparatus. Studies of spliceosomal snRNP biosynthesis in Xenopus oocytes have revealed a bipartite signal for nuclear import of U1 and U2 snRNPs, consisting of the Sm domain and its associated proteins and the 5'-m2,2,7G cap (36-38). However, in the case of U4 and U5 snRNPs the m2,2,7G cap is of reduced importance for nuclear import into the nucleus of Xenopus oocytes (36,39). Moreover, the m2,2,7G cap is not required for nuclear import of U1 or U2 snRNPs in mammalian cells (40,41). That the m2,2,7G cap is not invariably involved in nuclear-cytoplasmic traffic of snRNAs has been further reinforced by studies of U3 RNA biosynthesis, which have revealed that in both Xenopus oocytes and mammalian cells this RNA does not leave the nucleus during maturation, including cap hypermethylation (42,43).

Previous studies have defined elements within U3 RNA that are required for binding of specific proteins (44-46) and for pre-rRNA processing (17,18). Our results demonstrate that the initial presence of a m7G cap on U3 RNA is a determinant of subsequent nucleolar localization and we show that the same is true for U8 RNA. Our finding that the initial presence of a m7G cap is required for subsequent nucleolar localization of both U3 and U8 RNAs is compatible with the fact that these two RNAs share several other properties, including their association with fibrillarin (29), their roles in pre-rRNA processing (17-22) and their maturation within the nucleus without a detectable cytoplasmic phase (42,43,47). One difference betwen U3 and U8 RNAs as regards the present study is that the amount of fluorescent U8 RNA that becomes localized in nucleoli appears to be less than that observed when an approximately equimolar amount of U3 RNA is microinjected (Fig. 1 versus Fig. 5 and data not shown). This may reflect a relative difference in the number of nucleolar binding sites for U3 and U8 RNA. Endogenous U8 RNA is ~20% as abundant as U3 RNA (29). Moreover, U3 and U8 RNAs function at temporally distinct steps in pre-rRNA processing (17-22) and it is possible that this is reflected in the relative affinities of the two RNAs for their respective nucleolar binding sites. Indeed, the spatial localization of U8 RNA within the nucleolus as observed by in situ hybridization has been reported to differ from that of U3 RNA (48).


Figure 7. U8 RNA containing a triphosphate 5'-end. (A) Phase contrast image. (B-D) Fluorescence micrographs: (B) 1 min after microinjection; (C) 9 min after microinjection; (D) 15 min after microinjection. The images in (C) and (D) were contrast enhanced (each to the same quantitative extent) to confirm the absence of any nucleolar localization.

Virtually all RNA polymerase II transcripts have 5'-m7G caps and yet most do not localize in the nucleolus, so clearly the m7G cap is not in and of itself a nucleolar localization signal. This same conclusion follows from our finding that several other RNAs containing m7G caps (e.g. U2 RNA, pre-mRNAs and spliced mRNA) do not localize in nucleoli when microinjected into the nucleus (49; M.R.Jacobson and T.Pederson, unpublished results). The presence of nucleolar localization signals in U3 and U8 RNAs in addition to the 5' cap itself is also indicated by the fact that other RNA polymerase II transcripts, i.e. pre-mRNAs and spliceosomal snRNA precursors, are exported from the nucleus via a m7G cap-dependent mechanism (50,51). It is likely that U3 (and probably U8) RNA cap hypermethylation temporally precedes nucleolar localization, since m7G-capped U3 RNA undergoes cap hypermethylation in the nucleoplasmic but not the nucleolar fractions of both Xenopus oocyte germinal vesicles (47) and HeLa cell nuclei (M.R.Jacobson and T.Pederson, unpublished results). A specific internal region of U3 and U8 RNAs, box D, has been implicated in cap hypermethylation of these RNAs in Xenopus oocytes (47) and it is possible that this internal region also plays a role in nucleolar localization. This is further suggested by the observation that the nucleolar function of the intron-encoded U20 snRNA in directing site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation of pre-rRNA is dependent upon a box C/D structure that forms a 5',3'-terminal stem (52).

In a previous study on the role of U8 RNA in pre-rRNA processing in Xenopus oocytes it was found that ApppG-capped U8 RNA was able to rescue pre-rRNA processing in oocytes depleted of endogenous U8 RNA, suggesting that a methylated guanosine 5' cap is not required for nucleolar localization of U8 RNA in this system (21). We consider it likely that this reflects a difference between the Xenopus oocyte and the mammalian cell we have used in the present investigation. As mentioned earlier, the role of the 5' cap structure in snRNA intracellular traffic has already been found to differ significantly between Xenopus oocytes and mammalian cells in numerous previous studies (36-41).


Figure 8. Nuclear microinjection of fluorescent m7G(5')ppp(5')G-capped U3 RNA with a 100-fold molar excess of dinucleotide m7G(5')ppp(5')G (A and B) or dinucleotide A(5')ppp(5')G (C and D). (A and C) Phase contrast images 1 min after microinjection. (B and D) Fluorescence micrographs 30 s after microinjection.

Considering the present results in a broader context, it is apparent that the various RNAs imported into the nucleolus display a diversity of 5'-end structures. In addition to the trimethlyG-capped U3, U8 and U14 snRNAs, several nucleolar RNAs have triphosphate 5'-termini, e.g. 5S rRNA, RNase MRP RNA and RNase P RNA (53-55). U3 RNA in higher plants is transcribed by RNA polymerase III and contains the 5' [gamma]-monomethyl phosphate ester cap structure (56) first discovered on U6 snRNA (57), which is also transcribed by RNA polymerase III (58,59). A very large number of snRNAs are processed from introns of pre-mRNAs (60-63) and are therefore presumably imported into the nucleolus with monophosphate 5'-termini. Finally, plant viroid RNAs, which are closed circular single-stranded RNAs (64), are localized in nucleoli (65), thus providing an example of nucleolar localization of RNAs that have no 5'-termini. It is therefore clear that there are a considerable number of different signals and mechanisms for nucleolar localization of RNAs, as opposed to a single canonical targeting element, and that these diverse nucleolar localization mechanisms operate on RNA molecules with several different types of 5'-ends.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This investigation was supported by NIH grant GM-21595-21 to T.P. We thank Joan Steitz (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine) for providing the human U8 plasmid. We gratefully acknowledge the expert assistance of Roxanne Labrecque and Susan Kilroy in the transcription and fluorescent labeling of RNAs and we thank Qian Huang for help with the U8 RNA experiments.

REFERENCES

1 Kislauskis,E. and Singer,R.H. (1992) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 4, 975-978. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Wilhelm,J.E. and Vale,R.D. (1993) J. Cell Biol., 123, 269-274. MEDLINE Abstract

3 St Johnston,D. (1995) Cell, 81, 161-170. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Hesketh,J.E. (1996) Exp. Cell Res., 225, 219-236. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Osheim,Y.N., Miller,O.J. and Beyer,A.L. (1985) Cell, 43, 143-151. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Beyer,A.L. and Osheim,Y.N. (1988) Genes Dev., 2, 754-765. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Strouboulis,J. and Wolffe,A.P. (1991) J. Cell Sci., 109, 1991-2000.

8 Spector,D.L. (1993) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol., 9, 265-313. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Spector,D.L. (1996) Exp. Cell Res., 229, 189-197. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Du,L. and Warren,S.L. (1997) J. Cell Biol., 136, 5-18. MEDLINE Abstract

11 McCracken,S., Fong,N., Yankulov,K., Ballantyne,S., Pan,G., Greenblatt,J., Patterson,S.D., Wickens,M. and Bentley,D.L. (1997) Nature, 385, 357-361. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Fay,F.S., Taneja,K.L., Shenoy,S., Lifshitz,L. and Singer,R.H. (1997) Exp. Cell Res., 231, 27-37. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Zeng,C., Kim,E., Warren,S.L. and Berget,S.M. (1997) EMBO J., 16, 1401-1412. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Jacobson,M.R., Cao,L.-G., Wang,Y.-L. and Pederson,T. (1995) J. Cell Biol., 131, 1649-1658. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Jacobson,M.R., Cao,L.-G., Taneja,K., Singer,R.H., Wang,Y.-L. and Pederson,T. (1997) J. Cell Sci., 110, 829-837. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Ross,A.F., Oleynikov,Y., Kislauskis,E.H., Taneja,K.L. and Singer,R.H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 2158-2165. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Kass,S., Tyc,K., Steitz,J.A. and Sollner-Webb,B. (1990) Cell, 60, 897-908. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Savino,R. and Gerbi,S.A. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 2299-2308. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Hughes,J.M.X. and Ares,M. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 4231-4239.

20 Peculis,B.A. and Steitz,J.A. (1993) Cell, 73, 1233-1245. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Peculis,B. and Steitz,J.A. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 2241-2255. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Peculis,B.A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 3702-3713. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Reddy,R., Ro-Choi,T.S., Henning,D., Shibata,H., Choi,Y.C. and Busch,H. (1972) J. Biol. Chem., 247, 7245-7250. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Reddy,R. and Busch,H. (1988) In Birnstiel,M.L. (ed.), Structure and Function of Major and Minor Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Particles. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1-37.

25 Zieve,G.W. and Sauterer,R.A. (1990) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 25, 1-46.

26 Jacobson,M.R. and Pederson,T. (1997) In Richter,J.D. (ed.), Analysis of mRNA Formation and Function. Methods in Molecular Genetics. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 341-359.

27 Jacobson,M.R., Pederson,T. and Wang,Y.-L. (1998) In Celis,J. (ed.), Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, Vol. IV, pp. 5-10.

28 Pasquinelli,A.E., Dahlberg,J.E. and Lund,E. (1995) RNA, 1, 957-967. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Tyc,K. and Steitz,J.A. (1989) EMBO J., 8, 3113-3119. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Reddy,R., Ro-Choi,T.S., Henning,D. and Busch,H. (1974) J. Biol. Chem., 249, 6486-6494. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Shibata,S., Ro-Choi,T.S., Reddy,R., Choi,Y.C., Henning,D. and Busch,H. (1975) J. Biol. Chem., 250, 3909-3920.

32 Patton,J.R., Patterson,R.J. and Pederson,T. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 4030-4037. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Darzynkiewicz,E., Stepinski,J., Ekiel,I., Jin,Y., Haber,D., Sijuwade,T. and Tahara,S.M. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 8953-8962. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Liou,R.-F. and Blumenthal,T. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1764-1768. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Van Doren,K. and Hirsch,D. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1769-1772. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Fischer,U. and Lührmann,R. (1990) Science, 249, 786-790. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Hamm,J., Darzynkiewicz,E., Tahara,S.M. and Mattaj,I.W. (1990) Cell, 62, 569-577. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Fischer,U., Darzynkiewicz,E., Tahara,S.M., Dathan,N.A., Lührmann,R. and Mattaj,I.W. (1991) J. Cell Biol., 113, 705-714. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Wersig,C., Guddat,U., Pieler,T. and Bindereif,A. (1992) Exp. Cell Res., 199, 373-377. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Kleinschmidt,A.M. and Pederson,T. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 1283-1287. MEDLINE Abstract

41 Fischer,U., Heinrich,J., van Zee,K., Fanning,E. and Lührmann,R. (1994) J. Cell Biol., 125, 971-980. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Terns,M.P. and Dahlberg,J.E. (1994) Science, 264, 959-961. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Cheng,Y., Dahlberg,J.E. and Lund,E. (1995) Science, 267, 1807-1810. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Parker,K.A. and Steitz,J.A. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 2899-2913. MEDLINE Abstract

45 Baserga,S.J., Yang,X.W. and Steitz,J.A. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 2645-2651. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Lübben,B., Marshallsay,C., Rottmann,N. and Lührmann,R. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 5377-5385. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Terns,M.P., Grimm,C., Lund,E. and Dahlberg,J.E. (1995) EMBO J., 14, 4860-4871. MEDLINE Abstract

48 Matera,A.G., Tycowski,K.T., Steitz,J.A. and Ward,D.C. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell, 5, 1289-1299. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Wang,J., Cao,L.-G., Wang,Y.-L. and Pederson,T. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 7391-7395. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Izaurralde,E., Stepinski,J., Darzynkiewicz,E. and Mattaj,I.W. (1992) J. Cell Biol., 118, 1287-1295. MEDLINE Abstract

51 Terns,M.P., Dahlberg,J.E. and Lund,E. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 1898-1908. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Cavaillé,J., Nicoloso,M. and Bachellerie,J.-P. (1996) Nature, 383, 732-735. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Forget,B.G. and Weissman,S.M. (1967) Science, 158, 1695-1699. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Reddy,R., Li,W.-Y., Henning,D., Choi,Y.C., Nohga,K. and Busch,H. (1981) J. Biol. Chem., 256, 8452-8457. MEDLINE Abstract

55 Reddy,R., Tan,E.M., Henning,D., Nohga,K. and Busch,H. (1983) J. Biol. Chem., 258, 1383-1386. MEDLINE Abstract

56 Shimba,S., Buckley,B., Reddy,R., Kiss,T. and Filipowicz,W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 13772-13777. MEDLINE Abstract

57 Singh,R. and Reddy,R. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 8280-8283. MEDLINE Abstract

58 Kunkel,G.R., Maser,R.L., Calvet,J.P. and Pederson,T. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 8575-8579. MEDLINE Abstract

59 Reddy,R., Henning,D., Das,G., Harless,M. and Wright,D. (1987) J. Biol. Chem., 262, 75-81. MEDLINE Abstract

60 Maxwell,E.S. and Fournier,M.H. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 35, 897-934.

61 Bachellerie,J.-P., Michot,B., Nicoloso,M., Balakin,A., Ni,J. and Fournier,M.J. (1995) Trends Biochem Sci., 20, 261-264. MEDLINE Abstract

62 Maden,B.E.H. and Hughes,J.M.X. (1997) Chromosoma, 105, 391-400.

63 Smith,C.M. and Steitz,J.A. (1997) Cell, 89, 669-672. MEDLINE Abstract

64 Diener,T.O. (1979) Viroids and Viroid Diseases. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

65 Shumacher,J., Sänger,H.L. and Riesner,D. (1983) EMBO J., 2, 1549-1555.


*To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Worcester Foundation Campus, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA. Tel: +1 508 842 8921; Fax: +1 508 842 7762; Email: thoru@sci.wfbr.edu
+Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347, USA


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 23 Jan 1998
Copyright© Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Chu and A. J. Shatkin
Apoptosis and Autophagy Induction in Mammalian Cells by Small Interfering RNA Knockdown of mRNA Capping Enzymes
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(19): 5829 - 5836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. J. Watkins, I. Lemm, and R. Luhrmann
Involvement of Nuclear Import and Export Factors in U8 Box C/D snoRNP Biogenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2007; 27(20): 7018 - 7027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. J. Watkins, A. Dickmanns, and R. Luhrmann
Conserved Stem II of the Box C/D Motif Is Essential for Nucleolar Localization and Is Required, Along with the 15.5K Protein, for the Hierarchical Assembly of the Box C/D snoRNP
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 8342 - 8352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Pederson
Fluorescent RNA cytochemistry: tracking gene transcripts in living cells
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2001; 29(5): 1013 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
Prespliceosomal Assembly on Microinjected Precursor mRNA Takes Place in Nuclear Speckles
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2001; 12(2): 393 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. A. Speckmann, R. M. Terns, and M. P. Terns
The Box C/D motif directs snoRNA 5'-cap hypermethylation
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2000; 28(22): 4467 - 4473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
T. Pederson and J. C. Politz
The Nucleolus and the Four Ribonucleoproteins of Translation
J. Cell Biol., March 20, 2000; 148(6): 1091 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
T. PEDERSON
Movement and localization of RNA in the cell nucleus
FASEB J, December 1, 1999; 13(9002): 238S - 242S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Fortes, J. Kufel, M. Fornerod, M. Polycarpou-Schwarz, D. Lafontaine, D. Tollervey, and I. W. Mattaj
Genetic and Physical Interactions Involving the Yeast Nuclear Cap-Binding Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 1999; 19(10): 6543 - 6553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Narayanan, W. Speckmann, R. Terns, and M. P. Terns
Role of the Box C/D Motif in Localization of Small Nucleolar RNAs to Coiled Bodies and Nucleoli
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 1999; 10(7): 2131 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
T. S. Lange, M. Ezrokhi, A. V. Borovjagin, R. Rivera-León, M. T. North, and S. A. Gerbi
Nucleolar Localization Elements of Xenopus laevis U3 Small Nucleolar RNA
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 1998; 9(10): 2973 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. R. Jacobson and T. Pederson
Localization of signal recognition particle RNA in the nucleolus of mammalian cells
PNAS, July 7, 1998; 95(14): 7981 - 7986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (185K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pederson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pederson, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?