Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (54K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 1132-1133


Enzymatic mutation detection. Procedure for screening and mapping of mutations by immobilised endonuclease VII
Acknowledgements
References


Enzymatic mutation detection. Procedure for screening and mapping of mutations by immobilised endonuclease VII

Enzymatic mutation detection. Procedure for screening and mapping of mutations by immobilised endonuclease VII Stefan Golz, Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder1 and Börries Kemper*

Institut für Genetik der Universität zu Köln, Zülpicherstrasse 47, 50674 Köln, Germany and 1Institut für Experimentelle Chirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

Received October 2, 1997; Revised and Accepted December 15, 1997

ABSTRACT

Endonuclease VII (endo VII) binds to non-pairing nucleotides in DNA. This served as the basis for the development of a mutation detection assay involving immobilised endo VII and heteroduplex DNAs made by hybridisation of mutant and wild type DNA. The use of microtiter plates allows screening of large numbers of samples. Localisation of mutations in positive samples can be done in the same assay in a second optional step.

Mutations are inheritable changes in the sequence of the genetic material (mostly DNA) of an organism which can cause fatal defects like hereditary diseases or cancer (recent reviews in 1). Therefore, methods for mutation detection are gaining increasing importance especially in medical diagnostics. Mutations can be localised with great precision by DNA sequencing (2). The procedure is, however, time consuming, expensive, and requires toxic chemicals. Additional fast and low-cost alternatives have, therefore, been developed. In general these procedures measure mutations via mispairings in heteroduplex DNAs obtained after annealing wild type with mutant DNA in vitro (reviewed in 3). Besides physical and chemical methods, enzymatic assay systems using proteins involved in DNA repair have been established. One of these enzymes is endonuclease VII (endo VII) of bacteriophage T4 (phage T4) (4,5). Endo VII reports all possible mismatches including C/C, heteroduplex loops and single nucleotide bulges, single-strand overhangs, branched DNAs, bulky adducts, psoralen crosslinks and apurinic sites (6). The broad substrate specificity makes the enzyme an extremely versatile tool for mutation detection (7). The nucleolytic activity of endo VII has been used successfully to detect mutations in heteroduplex DNAs (8).

Here we describe an improved method that is based on the binding of mismatches and bulges in heteroduplex DNAs by immobilised endo VII in the absence of Mg2+. The use of microtiter plates allows screening of large numbers of samples making the procedure fast, easy and versatile. Localisation of mutations in the heteroduplex can still be done in the usual way by incubating aliquots of positive samples in the presence of Mg2+ (9,10). This step was applied successfully to re-check positives for false-positives and is strongly recommended for general use. For details see supplementary material online.

The binding assay was tested for all possible mismatches centrally located in heteroduplex DNAs of 84 and 164 bp using gel purified PCR-made strands for annealing. Heteroduplexes of 263 bp with a centrally located C/C mismatch or an 8 nt insertion made by the same procedure were also used.

For coating wells of microtiter plates, highly purified endo VII (4) was diluted to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml in Phosphate buffer containing 75 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 5 mM EDTA. Phosphate buffer was chosen at pH 6.5 instead of Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.0 as used in earlier studies with phage T4 enzyme since the cloned enzyme shows considerably higher specific activity under these conditions (11). In a standard reaction procedure, 1 µg of endo VII was added in 50 µl to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated at room temperature for 30-60 min. Longer incubation times did not influence the results. The plates can be used immediately or stored in a humid atmosphere at 4°C for up to 7 days without loss of activity. The protein containing coating solution is not removed from the wells and sample DNA is added directly.

For binding ~3 fmol of radioactively labelled heteroduplex DNA were added to the protein solution in the wells of microtiter plates, mixed gently and then incubated for 2 h in a humid atmosphere at room temperature. Liquid was discarded and unbound DNA and protein were removed by washing the plates five times each with 200 µl of the incubation buffer per well. For release of bound DNA from the well, 50 µl of 1% SDS solution was added. Repeated pipetting ensured complete removal. For visualisation and documentation, the sample volume was kept small and reduced by vaporisation if necessary. An aliquot of 5-10 µl of liquid was spotted on small Whatman 3MM filters, air dried and quantitated with a phosphorimager (FujiBas 1000).Yes-or-no answers report presence or absence of mutations and large screens of heteroduplex samples can be processed in less than a few hours.

As shown in Figure 1 all mismatches were clearly detected. Differences among individual mismatches were recognised. The affinity of endo VII to a mixture of C/C and G/G mismatches was the highest, and to a mixture of A/A and T/T mismatches the lowest. The signal-to-noise ratio between mismatch and control was in all cases better than two (Table 1).


Figure 1. Selective binding of heteroduplex DNAs by immobilized endo VII. Binding of heteroduplex DNA to immobilized endo VII was tested by adding 5'-end-labelled heteroduplex DNAs to endo VII coated wells of microtiter plates in 75 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5 as described in the text. After removal of excessive DNA by extensive washings, the amount of bound DNA was determined by spotting an aliquot of the sample recovered from the well to filter paper. The amount of radioactivity was determined by phosphorimaging. Images of samples are shown. (a) PCR fragments of 84 and 164 nt in length with all possible mismatches in a central location were used. For hybridization, equal amounts of mutant and wild type PCR fragments were mixed in 100 µl TE-buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA). The hybridisation was performed in a Biometra thermocycler by stepwise cooling (15 min per step) the sample in 10°C steps, starting with a initial 5 min denaturing step at 95°C. After hybridization the DNA was 5'-end-labeled by standard methods. (b) PCR fragments of 263 nt in length were used to make heteroduplex DNAs with centrally located C/C and G/G mismatches or an 8 nt insertion in the same central position. Binding to immobilized endo VII and analyses of the amount of bound materials was done in the same way as described under (a) above. (c) The sensitivity of the binding assay was tested by mixing equal amounts of synthetic heteroduplex substrates with a C/C mismatch (MMCC) or an 8 nt insert (8 nt loop) with different amounts of homoduplex DNA each at its individual optimal concentration of phosphate buffer and then analysed according to the protocol described above. Abbreviations: ctr, controls containing hybrid homoduplexes without mispairings; std, standards containing labelled substrate, 15 000 p.s.i. per spot.

The sensitivity of the procedure is high, and heteroduplex DNA can be detected reliably even in a background of up to 87.5% of homoduplex `wild-type' DNA. This was tested using synthetic oligonucleotides of 44 bp with a C/C mismatch (MMCC) or an 8 nt insert (8 nt insert) as substrates (Fig. 1c) (9). This sensitivity is sufficient for most applications. For example, if PCR products were obtained from heterozygous cells, 50% of the DNA will be heteroduplex and 50% homoduplex after melting and reannealing. The heteroduplex DNA will contain two complementary mismatches, each representing 25% of the total DNA. In case that endo VII reacts poorly with one of the mismatching nucleotides sensitivity may still be high due to availability of the other. Cases when both mismatches are detected poorly may be rare.

It should be pointed out that the concentration of the phosphate buffer can markedly influence the signal-to-noise ratio for individual heteroduplexes (11). Concentrations ranging from 20 to 150 mM were successfully used in trial experiments with several substrates (results not shown). For details see supplementary material online.

Table 1 . Signal-to-noise ratios of the binding assay for different heteroduplexes
Substrate Experiment no. Signal-to-noise-fold Standard deviation
PCR-84 bp
C/C + G/G 5 3.54 0.14
A/A + T/T 5 2.32 0.13
C/T + A/G 5 2.64 0.16
A/G + C/T 5 3.2 0.17
PCR-164 bp
C/C + G/C 5 3.46 0.25
A/A + T/T 5 2.3 0.21
C/T + A/G 5 2.66 0.15
A/G + C/T 5 2.98 0.21
PCR-263 bp
C/C + G/C 4 3.33 0.33
8 nt insert 4 4.9 0.16
Data from repeated binding experiments using heteroduplex PCR-made DNAs of 84, 164 and 263 bp with all possible mismatches and an 8 nt insert are compared. See text for further explanations.

In conclusion, these experiments show that besides endo VII's ability to cleave at mismatches its binding ability can also be used for mutation detection. A similar procedure using immobilised repair protein MutS of Escherichia coli was recently reported. However, MutS is not reliable in reporting C/C mismatches nor does it recognise insertion or deletion mutations (12).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Normalverfahren Ke-188/8-1 and 188/8-2) and through Sonderforschungsbereich SFB274. See supplementary material available in NAR Online.

REFERENCES

1 Modrich, P. (1994) Science, 266, 1959-1960. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 5463-5467. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Cotton, R.G. (1993) Mutat. Res., 285, 125-144. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Golz, S., Birkenbihl, R. and Kemper, B. (1995) DNA Res., 2, 277-284. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Kemper, B. and Garabett, M. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem., 115, 123-131. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Kemper, B. (1997) In Nickoloff, J.A. and Hoekstra, M. (eds), DNA Damage and Repair. Biochemistry, Genetics and Cell Biology. Humana Press, Totowa, Vol. 1.

7 Cotton, R.G.H. (1997) Mutation Detection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

8 Youil, R., Kemper, B. and Cotton, R.G.H. (1996) Genomics, 32, 431-435. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Solaro, P.C., Birkenkamp, K., Pfeiffer, P. and Kemper, B. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 230, 868-877. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Youil, R., Kemper, B.W. and Cotton, R.G.H. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 87-91. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Golz, S., Greger, B. and Kemper, B. (1997) Mutat. Res., Mutat. Res. Genomics, in press.

12 Wagner, R., Debbie, P. and Radman, M. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 3944-3948. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 221 470 5287; Fax: +49 221 470 5172; Email: b.kemper@uni-koeln.de


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 6 Feb 1998
Copyright© Oxford University Press, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
E. S. Miller, E. Kutter, G. Mosig, F. Arisaka, T. Kunisawa, and W. Ruger
Bacteriophage T4 Genome
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2003; 67(1): 86 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G.J.S. Jenkins, H.S. Suzen, R.A. Sueiro, and J.M. Parry
The restriction site mutation assay: a review of the methodology development and the current status of the technique
Mutagenesis, September 1, 1999; 14(5): 439 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Kupfer, S. Lee, and B. Kemper
Binding of Endonuclease VII to Cruciform DNA. VISUALIZATION IN THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 1998; 273(48): 31637 - 31639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (54K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrowScopus Links
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?