| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
Synthesis and RNA polymerase incorporation of the degenerate ribonucleotide analogue rPTP
Introduction
Materials And Methods
General methods
Synthesis
Melting experiments
Circular dichroism (CD) measurements
Polymerase reactions
TAR RNA synthesis
Digestion of TAR RNAs
RNA bandshifts
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Synthesis and RNA polymerase incorporation of the degenerate ribonucleotide analogue rPTP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Nucleoside bases differing from the normal purines, adenine and guanine, and the pyrimidines, thymine (uracil) and cytidine, are uncommon in DNA but relatively abundant in RNA, and in particular in transfer RNAs. The vast majority are the result of post-transcriptional modifications of the nucleic acids by specific enzymes. Although a specific role can seldom be assigned to these modifications, their importance can be inferred from their remarkable phylogenetic conservation. Analogues of the natural bases which could be incorporated enzymatically in vitro could provide useful functional alterations to synthetic RNA transcripts. Early mutagenesis studies have demonstrated that N4-hydroxycytidine triphosphate (1, Fig.
The N4-hydroxyl group can adopt either a syn or an anti conformation; the preferred syn form (6), however, interferes with hydrogen bonding of Watson-Crick base-pairs, and this is more evident in the case of N4-methoxy-derivatives (6). To constrain the hydroxyl group in an anti conformation we have previously synthesised a ribonucleoside containing a 5-membered second ring (2, Fig.
Figure 1. (A) Syn-anti conformations of N4-hydroxycytidine-5[prime]-triphosphate. (B) Base-pairing of N4-hydroxycytidine with adenosine and guanosine. (C) Structures of degenerate bicyclic ribonucleosides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General methods
1H NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker WM-250 and DRX 300, and 31P NMR spectra on a Bruker WM-250 spectrometer. NMR spectra were obtained in d6-DMSO. 31P NMR spectra are referenced to phosphoric acid. Mass spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard G205A Maldi-TOF spectrometer with positive polarity, in a matrix of [alpha]-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in MeCN:H2O (1:1) with 3% trifluoroacetic acid. UV spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 2 spectrophotometer fitted with a Peltier cell and samples were dissolved in 1% aqueous methanol. TLC was carried out on pre-coated F254 silica plates and column chromatography with Merck kieselgel 60. Unless otherwise stated reactions were worked up as follows: after removal of the solvent, the product was dissolved in chloroform and washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution. The combined organic fractions were dried over sodium sulphate and evaporated.
Synthesis
5-Allyluridine was prepared according to literature procedures (12). This was then converted to the 2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-tris-(tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl) derivative (4) as previously described (13).
2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-Tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-uridine (5). To a solution of 2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-allyluridine (4) (9.5 g, 15 mmol) in acetone (250 ml) was added N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (5.4 g, 46 mmol) followed by potassium osmate dihydrate (70 mg) in water (10 ml) over 5 min. The solution was then stirred at room temperature overnight, and the solvent was removed. The product was worked up as described and then chromatographed (CHCl3/5% MeOH) to give a white foam. Yield 9.84 g, 98%. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) -0.11-0.09 (18H, m, 6× SiCH3), 0.79-0.89 (27H, m, 3× C(CH3)3), 3.20-3.31 (2H, m, CH2CH), 3.52-3.55 (3H, m, CHCH2OH), 3.68-3.77 (2H, m, H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 3.91-3.92 (1H, m, H2[prime]), 4.03 (1H, t, H3[prime]), 4.19-4.21 (1H, m, H4[prime]), 4.49 (1H, t, OH), 4.56 (1H, d, OH), 5.85 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H1[prime]), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 5.3 Hz, H6), 11.40 (1H, s, NH). UV [lambda]max 268, 208; [lambda]min 230. M/z 684.306 (M+Na)+, 700.809 (M+K)+. 2',3[prime],5[prime]-Tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-uridine (7). The above diol (5) (8.3 g, 12.6 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane (125 ml, 10 ml/mmol) and water (25 ml, 2 ml/mmol) added. To this was then added a solution of sodium periodate (8.0 g, 37 mmol) in water (25 ml, 2 ml/mmol) and the solution stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h. The solution was concentrated then worked up as usual to give the crude aldehyde, 6. This was dissolved in THF (200 ml) and sodium borohydride (0.5 g, 13 mmol) added followed by water (1 ml) and the solution stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with acetic acid, the solution evaporated and the product worked up as usual and chromatographed (CHCl3/3% MeOH) to give an off-white foam. Yield 4.42 g, 56%, remainder (3.06 g) unreacted diol 5. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) -0.10-0.10 (18H, m, 6× SiCH3), 0.79-0.90 (27H, m, 3× C(CH3)3), 2.33-2.37 (2H, m, CH2CH2OH), 3.36-3.43 (2H, m, CH2CH2OH), 3.69-3.79 (2H, m, H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 3.91 (1H, br s, H2[prime]), 4.02-4.04 (1H, m, H3[prime]), 4.18-4.22 (1H, m, H4[prime]), 4.61 (1H, t, OH), 5.86 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, H1[prime]), 7.40 (1H, s, H6), 11.40 (1H, s, NH). UV [lambda]max 267, 209; [lambda]min 230. M/z 654.487 (M+Na)+, 671.172 (M+K)+. 2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-Tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-(2-phthalimidooxyethyl)-uridine (8). To a solution of the alcohol (7) (3.1 g, 5 mmol) in THF (50 ml) was added triphenyl phosphine (2.6 g, 1 mmol), N-hydroxyphthalimide (1.6 g, 1 mmol) and then diisopropylazodicarboxylate (DIAD) (2 g, 1 mmol) and the solution stirred at room temperature overnight. The solution was then evaporated, worked up as described and then chromatographed (twice, CHCl3/1% MeOH) to give a pale yellow foam. Yield 3.65 g, 96%. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) -0.11-0.10 (18H, m, 6× SiCH3), 0.58-0.91 (27H, m, 3× C(CH3)3), 2.61-2.71 (2H, m, CH2CH2ON), 3.60-3.69 (2H, m, CH2CH2ON), 3.72-3.90 (3H, m, H2[prime], H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 4.04 (1H, br. s, H3[prime]), 4.14-4.27 (1H, m, H4[prime]), 5.87 (1H, d, J = 7 Hz, H1[prime]), 7.56 (1H, s, H6), 7.54-7.64 (4H, m, Ph), 11.54 (1H, s, NH). UV [lambda]max 265, 220; [lambda]min 245. M/z 798.201 (M+Na)+, 814.482 (M+K)+.1-(2',3[prime],5[prime]-Tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-[beta]-d-ribofuranosyl)-4-triazolo-5-(2-phthalimidooxyethyl)-1H-pyrimidin-2-one (9). To a solution of 1,2,4-triazole (4.8 g, 6.95 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (75 ml) at 0°C was added phosphorus oxychloride (1.3 ml, 1.4 mmol) and the solution stirred at 0°C for 15 min. To this was then added triethylamine (11.6 ml, 8.3 mmol) and the solution stirred for a further 15 min at 0°C. To the solution was then added a solution of 2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-5-(2-phthalimido-oxyethyl)-uridine (8) (3.6 g, 4.6 mmol) in acetonitrile (25 ml) and the solution stirred at room temperature overnight (product has same Rf as starting material). The solution was evaporated and worked up as described and then chromatographed (CHCl3/1% MeOH) to give an off-white foam. Yield 2.44 g, 64%. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) -0.11-0.12 (18H, m, 6× SiCH3), 0.83-0.91 (27H, m, 3× C(CH3)3), 3.23-3.30 (2H, m, CH2CH2ON), 3.79-3.83 (2H, m, CH2CH2ON), 3.93-4.02 (1H, m, H2[prime]), 4.03-4.08 (1H, br s, H3[prime]), 4.21-4.38 (2H, m, H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 4.38-4.40 (1H, m, H4[prime]), 5.87 (1H, d, J = 4 Hz, H1[prime]), 7.51-7.64 (5H, m, H6, Ph), 8.19 (1H, s, triazole CH), 9.36 (1H, s, triazole CH). UV [lambda]max (nm) (10% MeOH/H2O) 331, 264. pH 12 [lambda]max 267. M/z 828.696 (M+H)+, 849.629 (M+Na)+, 865.969 (M+K)+.6-(2[prime],3[prime],5[prime]-Tri-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-[beta]-d-ribofuranosyl)-3,4-di-hydro-8H-pyrimido[4,5-c][1,2]oxazin-7-one (10). The above triazole (9) (2.0 g, 2.4 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane saturated ammonia (25 ml) and the solution stirred at room temperature overnight. The solution was evaporated and the product chromatographed (CHCl3/2% MeOH) to give an off-white foam. Yield 0.88 g, 58%. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) -0.06-0.09 (18H, m, 6× SiCH3), 0.81-0.89 (27H, m, 3× C(CH3)3), 3.31-3.34 (2H, m, CH2CH2ON), 3.66-3.74 (2H, m, H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 3.77-3.87 (3H, m, H2[prime], CH2CH2ON), 3.99-4.01 (1H, m, H3[prime]), 4.09-4.13 (1H, m, H4[prime]), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H1[prime]), 6.79 (1H, s, H6), 10.63 (1H, s, NH). UV [lambda]max (nm) (MeOH) 298 ([epsis] = 7400); [lambda]min (nm) 262. pH 1 [lambda]max 304 ([epsis] = 12 400). pH 12 [lambda]max 303 ([epsis] = 7700). M/z 651.697 (M + Na)+.6-([beta]-d-Ribofuranosyl)-3,4-dihydro-8H-pyrimido[4,5-c][1,2]oxazin-7-one (3). The above product (10, 0.85 g, 1.35 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (25 ml) and ammonium fluoride (0.3 g, 8.1 mmol) added and then the solution heated at 50°C overnight. The solvent was removed and the product chromatographed (CHCl3/20% MeOH) to give a white solid. Yield 0.31 g, 80%. 1H NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) 3.15 (2H, d, J = 5 Hz, CH2CH2ON), 3.45-3.58 (2H, m, H5[prime], H5[prime][prime]), 3.74-3.76 (1H, m, H2[prime]), 3.82 (2H, t, J = 5 Hz, CH2CH2ON), 3.91-3.97 (2H, m, H3[prime],H4[prime]), 4.98-5.01 (2H, m, 2× OH), 5.22 (1H, d, OH), 5.72 (1H, d, J = 5.9 Hz, H1[prime]), 7.00 (1H, s, H6), 10.50 (1H, s, NH). UV [lambda]max (nm) (H2O) 295 ([epsis] = 5100), 231 ([epsis] = 6100), [lambda]min 260. pH 1 [lambda]max 301 ([epsis] = 7800). pH 12 [lambda]max 302 ([epsis] = 5000). [epsis]260 (µM) 2.5. [cf dP: [lambda]max 295 ([epsis] = 6300), 231 ([epsis] = 7000). pH 1 [lambda]max 301 ([epsis] = 10 000), 224 ([epsis] = 4555). pH 12 [lambda]max 302 ([epsis] = 6400)]. m/z 286.727 (M+H)+, 308.711 (M+Na)+.6-([beta]-d-Ribofuranosyl)-3,4-dihydro-8H-pyrimido[4,5-c][1,2]oxazin-7-one-5[prime]-triphosphate (rPTP). To a solution of the nucleoside 3 (80 mg, 0.28 mmol) in trimethyl phosphate (0.5 ml) and triethyl phosphate (0.5 ml) under nitrogen at 0°C was added phosphoryl chloride (36.7 µl, 0.4 mmol), the reaction stirred at 0°C for 3 h. To the solution was then added tributylammonium pyrophosphate (3 ml, 0.5 M in DMF) and tributylamine (0.4 ml) and the solution stirred at 0°C for 45 min when the reaction was complete. The reaction was quenched with TEAB (20 ml, 1 M, pH 8.5) and then evaporated to dryness. The product was dissolved in 15 ml water and purified by anion exchange HPLC (buffer A, water: buffer B 0.3 M TEAB pH 8.5, gradient 0-100% B over 80 min), and then further purified by reverse phase HPLC (RP C-18, buffer A, 0.1 M TEAB: buffer B, 0.1 M TEAB, 50% acetonitrile, gradient 0-100% B over 40 min). Yield 75.3 µmol (28%) as 25 mM solution in water. 31P NMR [delta] (p.p.m.) (D2O/EDTA) [delta] -10.71 (d, [gamma]-P), -11.54 (d, [alpha]-P), -23.22 (t, [beta]-P). M/z 526.429 (M+H)+.Melting experiments
Melting transitions were measured at 260 nm in 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) at an oligomer strand concentration of [sim]1.8 µM. Absorbance versus temperature for each duplex was obtained at a heating and cooling rate of 0.5°C/min, and the melting transitions (Tm) determined as the maxima of the first differential curves with an error of ±1°C. Thermodynamic calculations were carried out as described by Gralla and Crothers (14).
Circular dichroism (CD) measurements
CD measurements were carried out on a Jobin-Yvon Dichrograph CD6 spectrometer. Data was collected at 0.25 nm intervals, and measurements were carried out between 190 and 330 nm at 20°C. Five such runs were averaged, calculated net of buffer and factor 3 smoothed. Samples were prepared with an oligonucleotide concentration of A260 = 0.5 in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) buffer (15), with a path length of 1 mm.
Polymerase reactions
Polymerase incorporation assays were carried out using the Riboprobe® System (Promega) using SP6, T3 and T7 RNA polymerases, and using pGEM® Express Positive Control Template (Promega). Reactions were carried out according to the manufacturers instructions. rPTP was used in place of either CTP or UTP, and at both 1× and 10× NTP concentrations. Products were electrophoretically separated on 1% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualised under UV light.
TAR RNA synthesis
Wild-type TAR and the TAR mutant G26:C39 to C:G RNAs were transcribed from the plasmids BT0 and BT76, respectively (16). In these plasmids, the TAR sequence abuts directly the T3 promoter. The plasmids were digested with EcoRI prior to the transcription reactions. Transcripts of 60 nucleotides were generated using either the Riboprobe® System (Promega), or for large scale synthesis RiboMAX® system (Promega). Small scale reaction mixtures for TAR RNA synthesis (typically containing 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM spermidine, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 40 U RNasin, 400 µM NTPs, 1 µg template DNA, 40 U T3 RNA polymerase, and 20 µCi [[alpha]-32P]GTP in 50 µl solution) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. When rPTP was used instead of UTP and/or CTP, the concentration of rPTP in the reaction was 400 µM (1× concentration) or 4 mM. The products were electrophoretically separated using 12% polyacrylamide gels (165 × 200 × 1 mm) containing 7 M urea at 35 W for 1 h.
Large scale reaction mixtures contained 80 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 24 mM MgCl2, 2 mM spermidine, 40 mM DTT, 7.5 mM NTPs, 5 µg template DNA, and 10 µl of T3 enzyme mix in 100 µl solution. The synthesis of TAR was also carried out using 10 mM rPTP instead of UTP. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The products were electrophoretically separated using 6% polyacrylamide gels (350 × 200 × 1 mm) containing 7 M urea at 35 W for 2.5 h. The transcripts were visualised by autoradiography or UV shadowing for small and large scale syntheses respectively. The correct band was cut out and the RNA was extracted with 0.5 M ammonium acetate/1 mM EDTA. The extracts were then desalted using NAP-10 columns (Pharmacia).
Digestion of TAR RNAs
Digests were carried out as described (17), and the nucleosides separated by HPLC on a Waters µBondapak[trade] RP-C18 (3.9 × 300 mm) column.
RNA bandshifts
RNA bandshifts were carried out according to the methods described previously (16). In summary, 10 000 c.p.m. ([sim]2 nM) of [[alpha] 32P]GTP labelled TAR RNA (prepared as described above, but using 5-fold excess of rPTP, i.e. 2 mM) was incubated at room temperature for 5 min with various concentrations of ADP-1 peptide (50-1000 nM) in TK buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 20 mM KCl) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 100 mM DTT. The mixtures were electrophoretically separated (10 W, 1 h) on 8% native polyacrylamide gels (165 × 200 × 1 mm) containing 0.1% Triton X-100. The bands were visualised by overnight exposure to autoradiography film. The autoradiograph was scanned using a Molecular Dynamics Scanning Imager 300A-T.
RESULTS
The synthesis of the ribosyl analogue, rP, is shown in Figure
Figure 2. Synthesis of P: (i) N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide/K2OsO4; (ii) NaIO4; (iii) NaBH4; (iv) PPh3/N-hydroxyphthalimide/DIAD; (v) 1,2,4-triazole/POCl3/TEA; (vi) dioxan/NH3; (vii) NH4F. To screen for the incorporation of the analogue into RNA by the RNA polymerases of the bacteriophages SP6, T3 and T7 the positive control template from the pGEM Express Positive kit (Promega) was used. UTP or CTP were replaced by rPTP in the polymerase transcription reactions. The 2[prime]-deoxynucleoside triphosphate, dPTP, is incorporated opposite dA or dG by Taq polymerase in PCR reactions. However, neither TTP or dCTP could be entirely replaced by dPTP (10). Both as a substrate triphosphate and as a template for Taq polymerase, dP resembled T more than dC (18). It had also been demonstrated that, in terms of hybridisation, P:A base pairs are equivalent to T:A base pairs, whilst P:G pairs are slightly destabilising when compared with C:G pairs in deoxyribo-oligomers (8). Using T7 polymerase, full length products were formed: when used to replace CTP a distinct, but different, product was obtained. Product yields were lower than the controls using the four NTPs (Fig. Figure 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the products of RNA transcription reactions using the positive control template in the pGEM Express kit (Promega). The products obtained using three separate bacteriophage RNA polymerases T7, T3 and SP6 are shown. Above each lane, the omission of either CTP or UTP (-C or -U) or the addition of rPTP at either the same or 10× the concentration of the other NTPs (+ or +10xP) is recorded. . TAR transcripts from wild-type DNA using rPTP to replace UTP (left), CTP or both pyrimidine triphosphates. The figure shows the gel after exposure to film for 30 min and after 2 h where it can be seen that rPTP can be used to entirely replace the pyrimidine triphosphates. Regulation of HIV-1 transcription is controlled by a specialised RNA/protein interaction (for review see 19). The trans-activation responsive region (TAR) of HIV-1 is located immediately downstream of the HIV-1 transcription start site from positions +1 to +59, and is therefore transcribed immediately upon initiation of transcription from the HIV promoter (20). TAR is known to form a highly stable stem-loop and it has a tripyrimidine bulge near the apex of the structure (Fig. Figure 4. Melting temperatures of each of the TAR RNA transcripts (wild-type and the mGC mutant) synthesised in the absence and presence of rPTP in place of UTP. The figure shows the structure of the wild-type TAR RNA with each of the uridine residues outlined showing the positions where it is known that P is incorporated. Both wild-type and mGC TAR transcripts were made using the bacteriophage T3 polymerase to assess the efficiency of incorporation of rPTP in place of either UTP or CTP. When transcription was carried out using rPTP to replace UTP, full length RNA transcripts were readily obtained. When replacing CTP, the yield of transcript was markedly reduced (Fig. In order to characterise the transcripts, large scale reactions were carried out. TAR RNA itself has been shown to have a high melting temperature, 65°C in 10 mM potassium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride (24) consequent on its hairpin structure, and this correlated with our findings (Tm in 100 mM sodium phosphate, 78°C). The transcripts containing rPTP in place of UTP also had a high melting temperature (76°C). This was unexpected in that P:G base-pairs in DNA duplexes are [sim]2°C less stable per modification than a C:G base-pair (8); there are also two U:G base-pairs in the native TAR RNA which will be replaced by P:G base-pairs in the analogous P-containing TAR (hereafter called P-TAR). However, the derived stacking enthalpy was lower than that of the native TAR; these results are shown in Figure Circular dichroism measurements were carried out on the transcripts. The native TAR RNA had a CD spectrum similar to that previously described (15,24); the P-TAR produced a rather similar spectrum (Fig. Figure 5. CD spectra of wild type TAR RNA and the P-TAR RNA. Binding of the Tat fragment, ADP-1, a fragment of the tat protein (residues 37-72), to the modified TAR transcript was studied. Wild-type TAR RNA, labelled with [[alpha]-32P]GTP was synthesised using either UTP or rPTP. The mutant mGC TAR was prepared as a control. RNA bandshift assays were performed in the presence of increasing concentrations of the tat fragment ADP-1 (0-1000 nM). The modified P-TAR ran with a slightly lower mobility due to the PMP residues; this altered mobility has also been observed with oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing dP. The mutant mGC TAR is known to have a 9-fold lower affinity for ADP-1 than the wild-type (16). Figure Figure 6. Bandshift of TAR RNA transcripts with ADP-1 peptide at 0-1000 nM ADP-1 concentration. Left shows the bandshift for the wild-type TAR, centre for the P-TAR and right the mGC mutant.
DISCUSSION
The ribo-P-5[prime]-triphosphate analogue was incorporated into RNA by all three RNA polymerases T3 and T7, and to a lesser extent for SP6. In the control system (pGEM Express Positive control template) rPTP was successfully used to replace entirely one of the two natural pyrimidine triphosphates to obtain full length transcripts (1.5 kb). In the TAR system using T3 polymerase it proved to be more difficult to obtain a high yield of product when using rPTP in place of CTP. Nevertheless, it was possible to obtain transcripts when both pyrimidine triphosphates were replaced by rPTP if the rPTP concentration was raised 10-fold. When rPTP was used to replace UTP there was a decrease in net synthesis between this and RNA derived by using the four natural triphosphates, but the yield was acceptable.
The replacement of UTP in TAR RNA by rPTP affects a significant number of base-pairs. There are eight U:A base-pairs in addition to the three uridine residues involved in the bulge and the single uridine in the hairpin. It has been shown that of these U23, the first base in the bulge, is essential for recognition by either Tat protein or the peptide ADP-1 (25). C5-Substituents are tolerated, and therefore it might be expected that the analogue P could be accommodated in this position. Remarkably, binding in the band-shift assay was only reduced by a factor of four compared with the wild-type TAR. In contrast, the biologically inactive mutant (mGC) showed 15-fold reduction in binding (Fig.
In addition to the nine U:A base-pairs there are also two U:G base-pairs in the native TAR RNA stem. In DNA duplexes the P:G base-pair is in rapid chemical exchange between Watson-Crick and wobble configurations with a very low free energy difference between them (28,29). Evidently the U:G base-pairs in TAR are correspondingly replaced by P:G with very little effect on structure.
The similarity between the wild-type structure and P-TAR was further demonstrated by the fact that they have similar melting temperatures, and CD spectra. They also showed virtual identity in Tm, stacking enthalpy and CD spectra.
Earlier work on the 2[prime]-deoxynucleotide analogue of P (dPTP) demonstrated that it had very similar kinetic parameters of incorporation to those of TTP (10). Further work is in progress to investigate the kinetics of incorporation of the ribo-P triphosphate, and the hybridisation properties of rP-containing oligomers as well as their templating properties.
Work during recent years has shown that interactions in RNA secondary and tertiary structures are much richer than those in DNA and that correspondingly RNA-protein interactions are likewise complex and only now beginning to be understood. We have used the Tat (ADP-1)/TAR system purely as a model to examine the incorporation of rPTP into a biologically active RNA oligomer, without necessarily expecting to learn anything new about the Tat/TAR interaction. Nevertheless, our findings have shown that incorporation of rPTP into TAR has had very little effect on its physical characteristics and biological activity. We are therefore in the process of examining the effect of site specific incorporation of P by chemical synthesis into TAR to examine its effects more rigorously. We believe that these aspects of RNA chemistry can be modulated by the introduction of hydrogen bond degenerate base residues which, in turn, should lead to a variety of novel outcomes and applications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Richard Grenfell and Jan Fogg for oligonucleotide synthesis, Dr Rita Bazzanini for mass spectra, and Amersham International plc (to DL), the Isaac Newton Trust (to FH) and the British Council and the Medical Research Council (to KM) for financial assistance.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 17 Apr 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. D. Graci, D. A. Harki, V. S. Korneeva, J. P. Edathil, K. Too, D. Franco, E. D. Smidansky, A. V. Paul, B. R. Peterson, D. M. Brown, et al.
Lethal Mutagenesis of Poliovirus Mediated by a Mutagenic Pyrimidine Analogue
J. Virol.,
October 15, 2007;
81(20):
11256 - 11266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
T. Suzuki, K. Moriyama, C. Otsuka, D. Loakes, and K. Negishi
Template properties of mutagenic cytosine analogues in reverse transcription
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 2, 2006;
34(22):
6438 - 6449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Print PDF (178K)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Moriyama, K.
![]()
Articles by Loakes, D.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Moriyama, K.
![]()
Articles by Loakes, D.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?