| Nucleic Acids Research | Pages |
Selected classes of minimised hammerhead ribozyme have very high cleavage rates at low Mg2+ concentration
Introduction
Materials And Methods
Oligonucleotides
Transcription
N18 selection
N4 selection
Amplification and cloning
Substrate excess kinetics
Ribozyme excess kinetics
Results
Selection at 20 mM Mg2+: generation 4 (N18g4)
Selection at low Mg2+ concentrations: generation 6 (N18g6)
N18g6 ribozymes exhibit a variable tolerance to low Mg2+ concentrations
N4 linker selection at 1 mM Mg2+
Dimer formation
KrMrc10 and IL2Mrc10 (miniribozymes with evolved linkers) versus KrRz and IL2Rz (hammerhead ribozymes with full-length helix II)
Discussion
No non-hammerheads were selected
Highly active miniribozymes are selected
Novel classes of RNA tetraloop?
Generality
Relation to other work
Conclusion
References
Selected classes of minimised hammerhead ribozyme have very high cleavage rates at low Mg2+ concentration
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
There are in excess of 30 distinct RNA motifs known to perform catalysis in the absence of protein. These include ribozymes derived from natural RNAs and those produced by in vitro selection (1). The catalytic potential of RNA is of interest both as a candidate molecule for pre-cellular evolution and as gene targeted therapeutics. The reactive capacity of any polynucleotide is a function of the chemistry of the individual nucleotides, the secondary and tertiary structure of the polymer, the presence of cofactors and other reaction conditions such as pH and temperature. The catalytic versatility of a nucleic acid is therefore amenable to combinatorial studies, such as in vitro selection, involving the artificial manipulation of a discrete sequence space in response to selective pressure.
The hammerhead ribozyme was first identified as a self (cis)-cleaving sequence found in a number of small, circular, RNA pathogens (virusoids and viroids) found in plants and a satellite RNA found in newt (2). Its consensus structure consists of three helical regions which form, at their junction, a conserved bed of 15 nt. The bulk of the conserved nucleotides can be located on a single oligoribonucleotide constituting an enzymatic entity capable of cleaving multiple substrates (3,4). Ribozymes designed accordingly can be directed in trans against any RNA substrate containing an endogenous 5[prime] UH (where H = C, U or A) (5-7). There is significant interest in these enzymes because they offer a means of specifically inactivating deleterious RNA, e.g. viral or oncogenic mRNAs. In their most useful format, nearly all conserved nucleotides are contained on the ribozyme strand of the hammerhead and helices I and III bind the substrate strand to the ribozyme strand; the role of helix II is less obvious and its role has been investigated in several deletion studies (8-11). In some studies the effect of removing helix II is very large (11,12) and in others it is insignificant (8). Some of the discrepancy may be explained by the different linker sequences, while in other cases differences in length of substrate-binding helices may be responsible. Crystal structures for the hammerhead ribozyme show proximity between helix I and helix II (13,14). These structures suggest a plausible interaction (perhaps Mg2+ mediated) between helix I and helix II. Whilst this interaction is remote from the cleavage site, it affects the global architecture of the molecule and thus the cleavage rate. It has been speculated that the interaction between helices I and II may in fact stabilise an inactive conformation (15). The truncation of helix I to ~6 bp abolishes this interaction and allows higher rates of catalysis to be observed (15). Likewise, the elimination or truncation of helix II allows maximal rates of cleavage to be observed with relatively long helices I (P.Hendry, M.J.McCall and T.J.Lockett, manuscript in preparation).
Miniribozymes are derivatives of the hammerhead ribozyme in which helix II has been replaced by a linker with a single G-C base pair (16). This minimisation strategy has created a novel structural format. Whilst the full-length ribozyme has been subject to selection over evolutionary time, size-constrained, trans cleaving ribozymes have not been exposed to selection in nature. Minimised ribozymes have been shown to cleave long RNAs more efficiently than full-length hammerheads (10) and could potentially provide improved trans cleaving activity in a cellular environment. Here we report the first comprehensive in vitro optimisation of this novel structure. In vitro selection was used to search an 18 nt RNA sequence space corresponding in size to a miniribozyme. The aims were primarily to identify all motifs within this size-constrained domain capable of supporting Mg2+-dependent phosphodiester cleavage of a 29mer RNA substrate containing a 13 nt segment of human IL-2 mRNA. Subsequently, the aim was to direct the active component of this population towards optimum catalytic efficiency at low concentrations of Mg2+ (0.5-2 mM) such as occur intracellularly (17). We show that the active population consisted almost entirely of molecules containing conserved nucleotides conforming to recognised hammerhead motifs. This set of molecules exhibited highly variable catalytic activity. An important goal was therefore to optimise the nucleotide composition between positions 9 and 12 amongst hammerhead-like molecules, within a context of size constraint, and therefore to evolve a linker between A9 and G12 which most efficiently favours the active conformation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Oligonucleotides
Oligonucleotides were synthesised on an Applied Biosystems model 394 DNA synthesiser. DNA phosphoramidite monomers were supplied by Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems. RNA phosphoramidites were from Glen Research (Sterling, VA). Deprotection and purification was as described previously (8,10). Gel-purified oligonucleotides were dissolved in sterile H2O. Concentrations were determined by UV spectroscopy and samples were stored at -20°C. Zero generation (g0) RNA was transcribed in vitro from a synthetic DNA template (N18g0T) containing a T3 promoter sequence (lower case, deoxyribonucleotide; upper case, ribonucleotide): N18g0T 65mer DNA, 5[prime]-ctc ggt acc gtt gat cct (n18) ttg cat tgg gcc ttt agt gag ggt taa tt, T3 promoter (minus strand) underlined. The RNA substrate (IL2bioS) was produced by solid phase synthesis. Biotin was incorporated at the 3[prime]-end of the 29mer substrate using BiotinTEG cpg from Glen Research (Sterling, VA): IL2bioS 29mer RNA, 5[prime]-CUC GGU ACC GUU GAU CCU GUC UUG CAU AA-biotin-3[prime] (putative cleavage triplet underlined). N4g0T 49mer 5[prime]-ctc ggt acc gtt gat cct gtt tcg (n4) ctc atc agt tgc att ggg ccc tat agt gag tcg tat ta, T7 promoter (minus strand) underlined. Primers used were: T3 15mer, 5[prime] aat taa ccc tca cta; P1 17mer, 5[prime]-ctc ggt acc gtt gat cc; P2 38mer, 5[prime]-gag gga tcc taa tac gac tca cta tag gcc caa tgc aa; P3 40mer, 5[prime]-gag gga tcc taa tac gac tca cta tag ggc cca atg caac, T7 promoters (plus strand) underlined. A number of substrates, ribozymes with full-length helix II and ribozymes with evolved linkers were produced by solid phase synthesis to test the comparative efficacy of the evolved miniribozymes versus conventional hammerhead ribozymes in different substrate backgrounds. These were: KrS17, 5[prime]-UUG CGA GUC CAC ACU Gg (17mer substrate); IL2S19, 5[prime]-AAC UCC UGU CUU GCA UUGc (19mer substrate); IL2S15, 5[prime]-UCC UGU CUU GCA UUg (15mer substrate); KrMrc10, 5[prime]-UCC AGU GUG CUG AUG AGG UAA CGA AAC UCG CAAa (34mer miniribozyme); KrRz, 5[prime]-CUC CAG UGU GCU GAU GAG UCC UUU UGG ACG AAA CUC GCA AAt (42mer ribozyme); IL2Mrc10, 5[prime]-GCA AUG CAA CUG AUG AGG UAA CGA AAC AGG AGUu (34mer miniribozyme); IL2Rz, 5[prime]-GCA AUG CAA CUG AUG AGU CCU UUU GGA CGA AAC AGG AGUt (40mer ribozyme).
Transcription
An optimal transcription reaction contained 0.3-1.0 µM template, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 12-25 mM MgCl2, 2 mM spermidine, 10 mM DTT, 50 µg/µl BSA, 0.01% (v/v) Triton-X 100, 5 mM each NTP (Boehringer Mannheim) and 20 U/µl T3 RNA polymerase (Promega) or 10 U/µl T7 RNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Reactions were incubated at 37°C. To generate labelled (32P) transcript, UTP was reduced to 0.4 mM and [[alpha]32P]UTP (Bresatec, SA, Australia) was added to 1.0 µCi/µl. N18g0 templates were prepared for transcription by annealing 65 pmol N18g0T (65mer) with an excess (75 pmol) of T3 primer (15mer) and extending with 2 U of Klenow enzyme (Boehringer Mannheim) using standard conditions, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. N4g0 template was prepared by annealing 400 pmol of N4g0T with 800 pmol of P3. Subsequent generation RNA was transcribed from PCR products with primer-incorporated T7 promoters (P2 for N18 and P3 for N4). All transcribed ribozymes were purified by Sephadex G-50 (Pharmacia) chromatography, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Purified RNA was resuspended in H2O and stored at -20°C.
N18 selection
Pool RNA (50 pmol) and IL2bioS substrate (25 pmol) were annealed in 1 mM EDTA/50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 37°C) by heating to 85°C for 2 min and cooling slowly to room temperature. The annealing reaction was incubated in 100 µl 1 M NaCl/1 mM EDTA/50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 37°C) for 15 min at room temperature with 200 µg avidin paramagnetic porous glass (MPG-avidin; CPG, Lincoln Park, NJ). Excess ribozyme was used to prevent the binding of free substrate. The solid magnetic phase was captured and the supernatant containing the unbound material was removed. Bound material was equilibrated using three washes at 40°C and three washes at 25°C (80 µl 1 M NaCl/1 mM EDTA/50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). This was followed by a 15 min incubation in 80 µl 1 M NaCl/1 mM EDTA/50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) at 37°C. Supernatant from this treatment provided a negative control (negative selection) which was used to establish a baseline for calculating the noise/signal ratio (background/cleavage product) in the selected fraction. Positive selection was initiated by resuspending the solid phase in 80 µl 1 M NaCl/50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 37°C). The selection buffers were supplemented with various concentrations of MgCl2 and incubated for the following times; g0-g4, 20 mM MgCl2, 15 min; g4-g5a, 20 mM MgCl2, 15 min; g4-g5b, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 min; g5b-g6b, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 min; g4-g6c, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 min; g4-g6d, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 min.
N4 selection
N4 pool RNA (300 pmol) and IL2bioS (150 pmol) were annealed in 50 mM Tris-HCl/1 mM EDTA, pH 7.6, and bound to 400 µg MPG-avidin. The selection protocol was as described for N18 above. High concentrations of pool RNA and IL2bioS were used to eliminate the effect of possible contamination from N18g4 or g6. Binding and wash buffer was 100 mM NaCl/100 mM KCl/50 mM Tris-HCl/0.2 mM EDTA, pH 7.6. Selection buffer was 1 mM MgCl2/100 mM NaCl/100 mM KCl/50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6. Three rounds of selection were conducted, with 1 min incubation at 37°C.
Amplification and cloning
The supernatant representing selected RNA was ethanol precipitated in the presence of a glycogen carrier (Sigma). Precipitated RNA was resuspended in 10 µl H2O and reverse transcribed with a large excess of P1 (100 pmol). Reverse transcription (RT) reactions contained 1 U/µl AMV reverse transcriptase (Boehringer Mannheim), 1× RT buffer (Boehringer Mannheim), 2 mM each dNTP (Promega) and 0.5 U/µl RNasin (Promega) in a 20 µl final volume. The RT reaction was incubated for 15 min at 37°C. An aliquot of 0.5 µl of the RT product was used directly for PCR. Thermal cycling was performed using a Corbett Research FTS-1 thermal sequencer (Corbett Industries, Sydney, Australia). Reactions contained 0.01 U/µl Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), 1× Taq reaction buffer (Boehringer Mannheim), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM each dNTP, 0.625 µM primers (P1 and P2). Parameters for thermal cycling were 1 × (94°C, 45 s; 45°C, 30 s; 72°C, 2 min), 4-20 × (94°C, 30 s; 55°C, 30 s; 72°C, 2 min). The number of cycles required was inversely proportional to the quantity of starting material, i.e. less cycles were required as the quantity of starting template increased due to ensuing rounds of selection and enrichment of the active component. P2 (N18) and P3 (N4) engineered T7 promoters in the PCR product enabling subsequent transcription as described above. PCR products encoding g4, g6b, g6c and g6d and N4g1, N4g2 and N4g3 were cloned separately into pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) using BamHI and KpnI restriction sites. Ligation mixes were used to transform competent XL1 blue Escherichia coli, which were grown on media containing X-gal and IPTG. White clones were selected at random and sequence data was obtained by dideoxy sequencing using Sequenase v.2.0 (US Biochemical). Cloned material from g4 and g6 was transcribed from pBluescript SK+ linearised with Acc65I for kinetic assays of individual molecules.
Substrate excess kinetics
Kinetic assays were conducted on pooled transcripts from each generation to determine changes in cleavage efficiency. Conditions were 10 nM ribozyme, a saturating concentration (4 µM) of 5[prime]-32P-end-labelled 15mer IL2 RNA substrate (IL2S15), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, 37°C). Reactions were in 25 µl volumes and were initiated by adding MgCl2 (final concentration 10 mM). Samples (2 µl) were taken at 10 min intervals and quenched immediately in 4 µl of stop solution (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.025% tracking dyes). Samples were separated in 15% polyacrylamide/7 M urea (1× TBE) and the amount of cleavage quantified using ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics). The Vmax was obtained from the slope of a linear plot of product formation versus time and converted to kcat, where kcat = Vmax/[Rz].
Ribozyme excess kinetics
Cleavage rates were also measured for individual molecules from the cloned samples using ribozyme in excess of the substrate. The ribozyme was used at 100 nM and substrate was 5 nM 32P-labelled IL2bioS 29mer RNA. In early experiments the ribozyme concentration was varied to confirm saturating conditions. Reactions were at 37°C in 25 µl 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0 or 7.6, as indicated) and were initiated by the addition of MgCl2 to a final concentration of 10 or 1 mM, as indicated. Samples (2 µl) were removed at 0, 20, 40, 60, 120, 300 and 600 s and quenched immediately in 4 µl of stop solution. Samples were separated in 15% polyacrylamide/7 M urea (1× TBE) and the amount of cleavage quantified using ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics). Rate constants (k1) for single phase reactions were derived by fitting the data to the equation; Pt = P8 - (exp(-k1t)PD), where Pt is the amount of product at time t, P8 is the amount of product at time [infin], k1 is the first order rate constant for the reaction and Pn is the difference between the percentage of product at t = [infin] and t = 0. For biphasic reactions, the data was fitted to a double exponential equation: Pt = [P1 - (exp(-k1t)PD1)] + [P2 - (exp(-k2t)P2)], where k1 is the rate constant for the first phase, k2 is the rate constant for the second phase, P1 is the extent of the first phase, PD1 is the difference between the percentage of product at P1 and t = 0 and P2 is the extent of the second phase.
RESULTS
The central feature of the selection scheme depicted in Figure
Figure 1. (a) Scheme for in vitro selection. The transcribed random pool RNA was directed in trans against a 29mer synthetic RNA substrate (IL2bioS) comprising a 13 nt segment of human IL2 mRNA. Annealed duplexes were immobilised to a MPG-avidin solid phase via a 3[prime] substrate biotin. Unbound material was removed and active structures were eluted by adding MgCl2. Molecules capable of supporting Mg2+-dependent cleavage became selectively disassociated from the solid phase due to reduced helical stability (i.e. Tm helix I < Tm helix I + III). (b) IL2bioS (substrate) and random (N18) RNA in trans. (c) The structure of the N4 random population. The selected fraction was amplified (RT-PCR) using primers P1/P2 (N18) and P1/P3 (N4). P2 and P3 encoded T7 promoters, enabling transcription of the subsequent generation. Starting from N18g0 RNA, five rounds of selection using 20 mM MgCl2 for 15 min at 37°C were performed. The populations of RNA resulting from each round of selection were tested for their ability to cleave an excess of radiolabelled RNA substrate (Fig. Figure 2. Enrichment of Mg2+-dependent phosphodiesterase activity in the N18 pool RNA using a non-stringent high MgCl2 regime (20 mM). The activity of separate RNA pools generated by iterative in vitro selection was assayed in conditions of substrate excess. Cleavage assay conditions were: ribozyme 100 nM, substrate (IL2S15 15mer RNA) 40 µM, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0, 37°C. Cleavage activity (kcat) displayed by the random pool RNA became detectable after three rounds of selection (g3) and peaked in g4, i.e. further enrichment of the kcat phenotype could not be obtained. Table 1. Figure 3. Sequence alignment showing composition of the N18 domain in the selected populations. Variable regions are highlighted. Numbers to the left of each sequence are clone numbers and are also used to identify miniribozymes containing that linker sequence. (a) A sampling of the cloned fraction of the g4 population indicating the state of enrichment after four rounds of low stringency selection. Linker positions are numbered 10.1, L.1-L.4 and 11.1. (b) The sampled fraction of the g6 populations showing the impact of high stringency selection on the identity of the variable (linker) region (positions 10.1-11.1 inclusive). To select populations of molecules displaying enhanced kinetic properties, three high stringency lineages were established from g4 RNA, employing shorter cleavage times and reduced Mg2+ concentration, producing g6b, g6c and g6d. These populations showed rate constants (k1) significantly higher than those obtained for g4 (data not shown). Cloning and sequencing of amplified material from the generation 6 populations revealed that they were much less diverse than N18g4. The reduced diversity was largely accounted for by a significant increase in the frequency of species carrying the sequence 5[prime]-G(10.1)NNNNC(11.1) in the linker region. In g4 the occurrence of 5[prime]-G(10.1)NNNNC(11.1) was 0.065 (2/31), i.e. close to the expected random incidence (0.25 × 0.25 = 0.0625). The occurrence of GNNNNC in the g6 populations was 0.72 (33/46), representing a 10-fold enrichment. This identity is concentrated (86%, 30/35) in the g6c and g6d families, i.e. those populations evolved under the most stringent conditions. Of the 72% of sequences exhibiting the identity GNNNNC, 93.9% (31/33) are GNNHHC (H = A, U or C). Cleavage kinetics of the 29mer biotinylated substrate at 1 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0, 37°C with ribozyme in excess were obtained for 28 molecules (24 of which were g6 individuals). Measurements were also made at 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0, 37°C for a subset of 14 molecules (Table 1). The reactions were distinctly biphasic for most molecules both at 1 and at 10 mM Mg2+. The activity of different molecules could clearly be delineated by rate constants observed for the first, rapid phase. While most molecules exhibited a more uniform slower second phase, where k2 was in the range 0.05 ± 0.02 min-1 (data not shown), the extent (P1) and rate constant (k1) of the first phase were highly variable. Examination of the cleavage rate constants for generation 6 of the N18 population suggested that variants which show high activity at low Mg2+ concentration comprise a discrete fraction of the entire set. The nature of this set was investigated by renewed selection, devised specifically to optimise identity between positions 10.1 and 11.1 (i.e. L.1-L.4). Assuming that a G at position 10.1 and a C at position 11.1 represents a kinetically favourable scaffold, we prepared a new randomised population of molecules, N4g0 (Fig. Other studies have shown that the apparent high activity observed in some minizymes is in fact due to dimer formation mediated by the linker/loop sequence (19,20). We therefore undertook to measure cleavage activity over a range of miniribozyme concentrations. The cloned miniribozyme 6c10 (100, 50 and 5 nM) was reacted with IL2bioS (0.5 nM) at pH 8.0, 37°C and 1 mM MgCl2. In this range of miniribozyme concentrations the observed cleavage rate constants did not differ significantly, although at the lowest miniribozyme concentration there was a slight decrease in the amount of substrate cleaved. In comparison a minizyme which dimerises via a GCGC linker displays an apparent dissociation constant of 170 nM (19), therefore miniribozyme 6c10 is acting as a monomer. Figure 4. Sequence data acquired from the N4g3 population. All sequences correspond to the derivation: 5[prime]-NNHH (linker positions L.1-L.4). Three classes of molecule can be identified: YRHH, WYHH and GHHA (Y = C/U, R = G/A, W = A/U and H = A/U/C). Numbers after sequences indicate the incidence of that particular motif in N4g3. A highly represented pyrimidine-rich subset (UUHH) of class II was identified. The data we have obtained suggest that the capacity for high cleavage rate constants in a miniribozyme is imparted by specific linker sequences. We wished to confirm that a linker we identified could impart favourable kinetic properties when it was incorporated into a miniribozyme targeted to a different substrate. Miniribozymes with a 6c10 (GGUAAC) identity in the linker were chemically synthesised with 9 nt in each hybridising arm to target a 19mer human IL2 mRNA substrate (IL2S19) and a 17mer Drosophila melanogaster Krüppel mRNA substrate (KrS17). These substrates provided targets with 9 (IL2S19) and 8 nt (KrS17) arranged symmetrically on either side of the unpaired C adjacent to the scissile phosphodiester bond. Rate constants for these miniribozymes were measured at 1 and 10 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.6, 37°C) and compared to those obtained for hammerhead ribozymes (KrRz and IL2Rz). KrRz was constructed with 10 nt in each arm and IL2Rz was constructed with 9 nt in each arm. Both KrRz and IL2Rz had four Watson-Crick base pairs in helix II. It is important to note that because of the length of the Krüppel substrate the standard ribozyme and the miniribozyme both form helices I and III of 8 bp each. Table 2 illustrates that the favourable kinetic traits exhibited by the 6c10 motif were equally apparent in both the Krüppel and IL2 substrate backgrounds. While similar rate constants are observed under saturating conditions for the miniribozymes and the standard hammerheads at 10 mM MgCl2, at 1 mM MgCl2 the miniribozyme is at least twice as effective. Table 2. The selection scheme, although devised independently, is similar to that published by Ishizaka et al. (21). It relies on selective denaturation of active ribozymes from the immobilised substrate following cleavage. The cleavage position in the substrate is such that only 6 bp bind the active ribozyme to the immobilised portion of the cleaved substrate. In contrast, uncleaved immobilised substrate forms at least 18 bp with the ribozyme. Thus active ribozymes are liberated into solution, whilst the inactive RNAs remain bound to the solid phase. After four rounds of selection of the N18 population under non-stringent conditions there was no further enrichment in cleavage activity. Sequence analysis of this population revealed that the population was very largely composed of hammerhead-like sequences. The 6 nt linker joining A9 and G12 was essentially random. The random distribution (0.25) of identities at these positions in g4 was compromised to some extent by a high occurrence of U at position 11.1 and A at position L.3. There is also a lower than expected occurrence of G at positions 10.1, L.2, L.3 and 11.1. However, this effect was slight. The same sequence was not sampled more than once. It was therefore reasonable to maintain that the diversity of g4 approached a substantial part of the 46 maximum (with some additional variation being contributed by position 7). Presumably this diversity reflected the lack of highly stringent demand on the phenotype. None of the non-hammerhead-like sequences exhibited any cleavage activity when examined individually or as a pool. The selection was conducted in trans allowing the possibility of isolating molecules exhibiting dimer-dependent activity. Non-hammerhead sequences sampled could therefore plausibly represent truncations of potentially active structures whose additionally required components have not been observed in the cloned and sequenced sample. Alternatively, these may represent inactive molecules or `noise'. Notable also in g4 is molecule 4.31 (Fig. A series of higher stringency selections yielded the sixth generation of the N18 population. In the most stringently evolved populations (g6c and g6d) the dramatic enrichment of molecules bearing the sequence motif G(10.1)NNNNC(11.1) was correlated with significantly improved cleavage rate constants for those populations (data not shown). The individual reactions (single turnover conditions) were mostly biphasic with an initial phase that was highly variable in rate constant (k1) and extent (P1). The relatively low extent of many of the reactions in the first phase is likely to be due to the 29mer biotinylated substrate that was used in the selection experiments. This ribozyme-substrate combination has substantial overhangs at each end which may have contributed to the propensity to form a higher than usual proportion of inactive conformers. Kinetic analysis of individual members of these populations revealed that the G(10.1)NNNNC(11.1) motif, of itself, is insufficient to confer a robust cleavage phenotype (k1 determined at 1 mM ranged from 0.04 to 1.4 min-1). Rather, it predisposed molecules towards having moderate to high cleavage kinetics (12 out of 17 molecules bearing this motif displayed first phase k1 values [ge]0.5 min-1, with only four having values [le]0.1, at 1 mM Mg2+, pH 8.0, 37°C). The data indicated that only a subset of linker permutations satisfy the requirement for very high cleavage activity. It is possible that the linker exerts influence on the equilibrium position between variably active conformations and that some linkers favour a more active conformation resulting in high k1 and P1. The rate constants and the extents of the first phase were generally reduced when Mg2+ was lowered from 10 to 1 mM. However, the reduction in cleavage activity was not uniform. For some molecules k1 dropped dramatically (20- to 50-fold). In several instances this reduction involved complete extinction of the biphasic character of the reaction. At 1 mM these molecules exhibited slow monophasic kinetics. Other molecules experienced only a moderate reduction in extent and rate of the initial cleavage reaction (i.e. in the range 2- to 5-fold) when Mg2+ was lowered to 1 mM. A subset of linkers could therefore be identified which imparted tolerance to low concentrations of Mg2+ (shown above the dotted line in Table 1). This group was distinguished on the basis of exhibiting k1 [ge] 0.5 min-1 and P1 > 10% at 1 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0, 37°C. The results of the high stringency selections clearly demonstrated that a G-C pair was required to close the loop in the linker sequence for high cleavage efficiency. That population had been arrived at through a series of selections with varying stringency and it was therefore decided to perform a highly stringent selection on a virgin population randomised only in the linker sequence between G10.1 and C11.1. The third generation (N4g3) was cloned and sequenced (Fig. These miniribozymes are acting as monomers, as demonstrated by the lack of dependence of cleavage rate on ribozyme concentration in the range 5-100 nM and the absence of a correlation between predicted ability to dimerise and observed cleavage efficiency. Therefore, linkers supporting improved kinetic activity presumably act by providing a scaffold which will promote correct folding of the conserved G-A base pair stack which constitutes domain II in the hammerhead crystal structures (13). Our data suggest that a G(10.1).C(11.1) base pair provides a key component of this scaffold. We propose that another key component of an optimal scaffold in a miniribozyme is a linker sequence able to form a stable tetraloop between positions 10.1 and 11.1, i.e. a structure which is able to turn around a narrow enough radius without creating torsion on the complex base paired structure which stacks above it. This hypothesis is supported by the statistically high occurrence of the known tetraloop GNRA in the g6 populations (0.15 as compared to 0.03 expected random occurrence). The GNRA motif forms a sheared G-A base pair which enables it to reverse the direction of the RNA backbone within an extremely narrow radius (24). However, there is evidence that some other known stable tetraloops do not satisfy the requirement for high cleavage rates in a miniribozyme. For instance, CUUG, when incorporated into a G(10.1).C(11.1) miniribozyme, exhibited poor cleavage kinetics (11). It seems therefore that only a subset of tetraloops are able to satisfy the requirement for both stable reversal of strand direction and a scaffold which favours an active conformation of the conserved domains. The most effective molecules characterised here were GUUUUC (6.21), GGUAAC (6c10) and GUCUAC (6.14). Related molecules occurred at high frequency in the low Mg2+ selected N4 populations. Three classes of molecule were delineated in the N4g3 sequence data (Fig. The effect of the evolved linkers on miniribozyme activity (high cleavage rate constants especially at low magnesium concentrations) was fully transportable to another context, as demonstrated by the activity of KrMRc10 and the comparison of its activity with that of the standard hammerhead at both 10 and 1 mM MgCl2 (Table 2). Cleavage rate constants for conventional hammerheads on short substrates vary markedly in response to the length of helix I and appear to be highest when helix I is 5-6 bp (15). On the other hand, rate constants for miniribozymes appear to be optimal at longer arm lengths (16). Thus the superiority of the miniribozymes over the standard hammerhead even at 10 mM MgCl2 is not necessarily in conflict with apparently contrary observations made in the context of shorter hybridising arms. Nonetheless, the difference between miniribozymes and hammerheads becomes greater when Mg2+ concentration is lowered. The most recent communication involving hexanucleotide replacement of helix II reported G(10.1)CGNGC(11.1) as a highly active set of motifs identified using in vitro selection (26). Rate constants for the most active motif (GCGUGC) were 0.64 min-1 (0°C, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0) and 0.23 min-1 (37°C, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0). Zillmann et al. (26) clearly indicate that C(L.1).G(L.4) is a preferred identity according to their scheme of selection. The differences between the Zillmann result and those reported here are probably due to the selection protocol. The selection was conducted at 0°C and with a very long helix I. Not unexpectedly, the selected ribozyme was most active at low temperatures. This illustrates the need to formulate conditions of selection which are consistent with the intended use of the molecule. At 37°C the molecules we have identified in this study cleave between two and 10 times more rapidly than those identified by Zillmann et al. Previous studies have demonstrated that the replacement of stem-loop II in the hammerhead with a 6 nt linker resulted in a reduction in catalytic activity. Tuschl and Eckstein (11) report an order of magnitude reduction in kcat (i.e. 3.1 to 0.3 min-1) when a 4 bp helix II was replaced by the linker sequence G(10.1)CUUGC(11.1). Similarly, Long and Uhlenbeck (12) report a 10-fold decrease in kcis (1.0 to 0.09 min-1) and kcat (1.5 to 0.12 min-1) when they compare a 4 bp helix II molecule to G(10.1)UUUGC(11.1). In both of these cases there is a G nucleotide in loop position L3 or L4, where our selection found they were not well tolerated. Additionally, their standard ribozymes had only 5 bp in each of helices I and III, a situation which favours the ribozyme over the miniribozyme (27). The results demonstrate the existence of highly active miniribozymes and that there is not necessarily a reduction in activity associated with the minimisation of helix II to a single Watson-Crick base pair. The activity of a miniribozyme is dependent on linker composition. Rate constants in excess of those observed for conventional hammerhead ribozymes can be achieved by appropriately engineered linker motifs. This high activity can be maintained at physiologically relevant Mg2+ ion concentrations. The composition of the linker region has been thoroughly assayed in this study by means of in vitro evolution. Three classes of linker design have been elucidated via in vitro selection using low Mg2+ concentrations. The high activities displayed by some of these miniribozymes and the transferability of these observations into different substrate backgrounds has resulted in generalised designs for oligonucleotide reagents that retain high catalytic activity at physiological concentrations of Mg2+ ion. Whilst the relative activities of miniribozymes and conventional hammerheads will almost certainly vary with the length of helix I, the superiority of the miniribozyme at a physiological concentration of Mg2+, using helix lengths devised for optimum results on gene-length substrates, suggests that miniribozymes offer a first choice design for in vivo studies.
Selection at 20 mM Mg2+: generation 4 (N18g4)
aValues in parentheses were obtained using 10 mM MgCl2 in the cleavage reaction.
bk1, first order rate constant (min-1).
cP1, extent of the first phase (percentage cleaved); where no number is given, the reactions were monophasic and the extent of the reaction in given as P8.
dP8 = (P1 + P2), the estimated end-point (percentage cleaved).
eThe highlighted block is those molecules with a G at position 10.1 and a C at position 11.1; those highlighed in the darker block above the line are the most active as defined in the text.
Selection at low Mg2+ concentrations: generation 6 (N18g6)
N18g6 ribozymes exhibit a variable tolerance to low Mg2+ concentrations
N4 linker selection at 1 mM Mg2+
Dimer formation
KrMrc10 and IL2Mrc10 (miniribozymes with evolved linkers) versus KrRz and IL2Rz (hammerhead ribozymes with full-length helix II)
k1, observed rate constant.
P1, per cent substrate cleaved in initial reaction.
DISCUSSION
No non-hammerheads were selected
Highly active miniribozymes are selected
Novel classes of RNA tetraloop?
Generality
Relation to other work
Conclusion
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: jnl.info{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 14 May 1999
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1999.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
X. Chen, L. Denison, M. Levy, and A. D. Ellington
Direct selection for ribozyme cleavage activity in cells
RNA,
November 1, 2009;
15(11):
2035 - 2045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
W. Lim and J. D. Furlow
Ribozyme suppression of endogenous thyroid hormone receptor activity in Xenopus laevis cells
Nucleic Acids Res.,
August 1, 2002;
30(15):
3490 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Tang and R. R. Breaker
Structural diversity of self-cleaving ribozymes
PNAS,
May 23, 2000;
97(11):
5784 - 5789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Li, W. Zheng, A. H. Kwon, and Y. Lu
In vitro selection and characterization of a highly efficient Zn(II)-dependent RNA-cleaving deoxyribozyme
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 15, 2000;
28(2):
481 - 488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
Y. Kato, T. Kuwabara, M. Warashina, H. Toda, and K. Taira
Relationships between the Activities in Vitro and in Vivo of Various Kinds of Ribozyme and Their Intracellular Localization in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 27, 2001;
276(18):
15378 - 15385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Print PDF (220K)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Conaty, J.
![]()
Articles by Lockett, T.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Conaty, J.
![]()
Articles by Lockett, T.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?