Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (535K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (82)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niemeyer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niemeyer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nucleic acid amplification
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Self-assembly of DNA-streptavidin nanostructures and their use as reagents in immuno-PCR
Nucleic Acids Research Pages 4553-4561


Self-assembly of DNA-streptavidin nanostructures and their use as reagents in immuno-PCR
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   PCR synthesis
   Oligomeric DNA-protein complexes
   Immuno-PCR
Results
   Self-assembly of the DNA-STV complexes
   AFM imaging
   DNA-protein networks as reagents in IPCR
Discussion
   Self-assembly of DNA-STV complexes
   AFM imaging of nanostructures
   Applications
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
References


Self-assembly of DNA-streptavidin nanostructures and their use as reagents in immuno-PCR

Christof M. Niemeyer*, Michael Adler, Bruno Pignataro1, Steven Lenhert1, Song Gao1, Lifeng Chi1, Harald Fuchs1, Dietmar Blohm

Universität Bremen, FB 2-UFT, Biotechnologie und Molekulare Genetik, Leobener Straße, D-28359 Bremen, Germany and 1Universität Münster, Physikalisches Institut, Wilhelm-Klemm Straße 10, D-48149 Münster, Germany

Received September 6, 1999; Revised and Accepted October 4, 1999

ABSTRACT

The self-assembly of bis-biotinylated double-stranded DNA and the tetravalent biotin-binding protein streptavidin (STV) have been studied by non-denaturing gel electrophoresis and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The rapid self-assembly reproducibly generated populations of individual oligomeric complexes. Most strikingly, the oligomers predominantly con-tained bivalent STV molecules bridging two adjacent DNA fragments to form linear nanostructures. Trivalent STV branch points occurred with a lower frequency and the presence of tetravalent STV was scarce. However, valency distribution, size and the exchange dynamics of the supramolecular aggregates were highly sensitive to stoichiometric variations in the relative molar coupling ratio of bis-biotinylated DNA and STV. The largest aggregates were obtained from equimolar amounts while excess STV led to the formation of smaller oligomers appearing as fingerprint-like band patterns in electrophoresis. Excess DNA, however, induces a complete breakdown of the oligomers, likely a consequence of the instability of STV conjugates containing more than two biotinylated DNA fragments. It was demonstrated that the oligomers can further be functionalized, for instance by the coupling of biotinylated immunoglobulins. Both pure and also antibody-modified DNA-STV oligomers were used as reagents in immuno-PCR (IPCR), a highly sensitive detection method for proteins and other antigens. Employment of the supramolecular reagents led to an ~100-fold enhanced sensitivity compared to the conventional IPCR procedure.

INTRODUCTION

DNA has a vast amplification potential due to PCR, allowing the detection of nucleic acids at sensitivity levels far below those available for the detection of proteins by conventional immunological methods, such as the antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The detection of a few hundred protein molecules can be attained by a combination of ELISA with the amplification power of PCR. This method, termed immuno-PCR (1) (IPCR) is based on the coupling of specific antibodies with a DNA reporter fragment to be amplified by PCR. The original protocol of IPCR has been adjusted for the extremely sensitive detection of various antigens (2-8), and thus, the method has great potential for innumerable biomedical applications. For example, IPCR has recently been discussed as a high sensitivity diagnostic tool for human prion diseases (9). One critical aspect of IPCR is efficient coupling of the target-specific antibody with the DNA reporter molecule. For instance, this was attained by means of a recombinant protein chimera with specificity for biotinylated DNA and immunoglobulin G (IgG) (1), or else, through direct chemical coupling of the IgG with the DNA reporter (4). However, the establishment of immuno-PCR as a routine method for immunological diagnostics requires convenient and robust experimental protocols, i.e. the avoidance of sophisticated technical equipment and sensitive reagents. Since the former approaches require laborious preparation of the particular reagents, the biotin-binding proteins avidin and streptavidin (STV) have been utilized as a more convenient molecular linker in various IPCR reports published. Typically, assembly of the immuno complex is achieved by successive coupling steps of the several components (3). The major drawbacks of this strategy are the large number of incubation steps required, and more important, the incomplete interphase coupling of the reagents, occurring with an efficiency of only ~10% for each step (8). Also, conjugation of tetravalent STV with biotinylated antibodies and DNA fragments to preform active complexes in solution is not feasible. Mixing of the biotinylated components with STV yields a hardly reproducible, complex mixture of several possible conjugates containing non-productive DNA1-4-STV and IgG1-4-STV complexes and also the free compounds in addition to the mixed conjugates desired. Although this strategy has been described (2,5), it seems unsuitable for a highly standardized routine method since reproducibility in reagent preparation is essential for the high sensitivity of IPCR (10).

On the other hand, synthetic strategies based on self-assembly of molecular building blocks are of growing importance for the fabrication of functional supramolecular composites (11). Due to its extraordinary material properties, DNA is considered as a highly promising construction material (12-14) for the fabrication of nanometer scale molecular scaffolds and surface architectures (15-17) and even nanomechanical devices (18). We have previously reported on the use of the biotin/STV system in DNA technology (19-22), and we anticipated that the self-assembly of bis-biotinylated DNA, STV and specific biotinylated antibodies should lead to oligovalent nanostructures suitable as reagents in IPCR (Fig. 1). Due to their oligomeric nature, the use of supramolecular networks as marker reagents should cause enhanced PCR signals. Moreover, due to their oligovalency, molecular networks should display additional avidity effects (23), leading to enhanced affinity and specificity of binding to surface-immobilized targets. Supra-molecular DNA-STV complexes, generated from various double-stranded (ds)DNA fragments of different lengths, containing two biotin groups attached through the 5[prime]-hydroxyl groups of the two complementary DNA strands (Fig. 1), were analyzed by non-denaturing gel electrophoresis. The complex but highly reproducible band patterns observed were dependent both on the DNA length and on the molar ratio of the two educts. The fingerprint-like patterns indicated that distinct distributions of oligomer species were formed. The exchange dynamics of the oligomers were elucidated by electro-phoresis. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) investigations of the DNA-STV oligomeric complexes gave insights into the molecular dimensions of the complexes, the valency of STV and the localization of potential binding sites for the further attachment of functional groups, such as biotinylated antibodies (Fig. 1). The latter is relevant for the utilization of the complexes as tools in molecular biotechnology, and also, their application as supramolecular frameworks for nanoconstructions. It is demonstrated that both the pure and also the antibody-functionalized DNA-STV oligomers are superior reagents in IPCR, leading to significantly enhanced signal intensities compared with standard IPCR and conventional ELISA detection.


Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the self-assembled oligomeric DNA-protein complexes investigated in this study. Starting from plasmid DNA, M13mp18 or pUC19, dsDNA fragments 1-4 were prepared by PCR using two primer oligonucleotides labeled with a biotin substituent at its 5[prime]-ends. For comparison, mono-biotinylated dsDNA fragments, 1a, 3a and 4a, were also prepared. The lengths of the fragments were 86 (1), 124 (2), 169 (3) and 256 (4) bp. The bis-biotinylated dsDNA was mixed with equimolar amounts of STV to generate oligomeric DNA-STV complexes, useful as reagents in IPCR (Fig. 5A). The DNA-STV networks were functionalized by coupling with biotinylated antibody in situ, and the resulting complexes were purified by chromatography and applied as reagents in IPCR (Fig. 5B).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PCR synthesis

Mono-biotinylated and bis-biotinylated dsDNA fragments of different lengths, 1-4, were prepared from M13mp18 (Promega) and pUC 19 (New England Biolabs) DNA templates using PCR. The following oligonucleotide primers (Interactiva) were used for preparation of the DNA oligomers: DNA 1 (M13mp18-based 86 bp fragment), 5[prime]-biotin-AGC GGA TAA CAA TTT CAC ACA GGA-3[prime] (bcA) and 5[prime]-biotin-CAG GTC GAC TCT AGA GGA TCC-3[prime] (bD); mono-biotinylated 1a, bD and a non-biotinylated analog of bcA; DNA 2 (M13mp18-based 124 bp fragment), 5[prime]-biotin-GAA TTC GAG CTC GGT ACC CGG-3[prime] (bcC) and 5[prime]-biotin-AAG GCG ATT AAG TTG GG-3[prime] (bG); DNA 3 (M13mp18-based 169 bp fragment), bcA and bG; mono-biotinylated 3a, bcA and a non-biotinylated analog of bG; DNA 4 (pUC19-based 256 bp fragment), 5[prime]-biotin-ATT GTT GCC GGG AAG CTA GAG TAA-3[prime] (bBLA1) and 5[prime]-biotin-TAT GCA GTG CTG CCA TAA CCA TGA-3[prime] (bBLA2); mono-biotinylated 4a, bBLA1 and a non-biotinylated analog of bBLA2. PCR was carried out using an initial denaturation step at 95°C (5 min) and subsequently 40 thermal cycles of the following profile: 55°C (1 min), 72°C (2 min), 95°C (1 min). The PCR amplification products were purified on a Superdex 200 gel filtration column (Pharmacia) using buffer A (100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) with an FPLC system (Pharmacia), concentrated by ultrafiltration, re-diluted in buffer B (10 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.3, containing 5 mM EDTA) and quantified by photometry.

Oligomeric DNA-protein complexes

Conjugates of recombinant STV (IBA, Göttingen, Germany) and the biotinylated dsDNA fragments were typically prepared by adding 1 µl of STV (2 µM in buffer B) to ~13 µl of buffer B, and subsequently 2 µl of the dsDNA (1-5 µM in buffer B). The final DNA concentration was kept constant at ~0.4 µM, and the molar ratio of DNA to STV was typically in the range 1:10-10:1. The incubation time ranged from 5 min at 37°C up to 4 weeks at 4°C. Conjugates of biotinylated antibody, STV and dsDNA were prepared by addition of 1 molar equivalent of the antibody to an oligomeric conjugate, previously prepared from STV and 1 or 0.5 molar equivalents of dsDNA 3. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 4°C and the DNA-protein aggregate was purified on an FPLC Superdex 200 gel filtration column (Pharmacia). The aggregate eluting in the void volume of the column was concentrated by ultrafiltration, stabilized with 50% glycerol (Sigma) and stored at -80°C. The samples were analyzed by non-denaturing electrophoresis on 1.5 and 2% agarose gels and subsequent ethidium bromide staining. AFM samples were prepared by placing a 6 µl drop of a solution containing 8 µM MgCl2 and ~500 nM DNA-STV conjugates on a parafilm sheet. A higher relative STV concentration required a higher conjugate concentration in the drop. The drop was adsorbed onto freshly cleaved mica, and left to fix for 1 min. The drop was then quickly washed three times with 50 ml of deionized water, and immediately blown dry for 5 min with nitrogen gas. At a high relative STV concentration, the samples did not easily spread over the surface. In order to spread these conjugates, the nitrogen was blown at an angle of 45° at a strength that moved the meniscus over the mica at a rate of 30 cm/s (24). The AFM inspection was carried out with commercial instruments (Digital Instruments Dimension 3000 and Multimode III) using Si cantilevers purchased from Nanosensor. The AFM images were taken with instruments operating in high amplitude dynamic mode with a home-made active feedback circuit (25), which prevents the onset of intermittent contact (tapping). AFM can be stably run in the attractive interaction regime in air so that interaction between the scanning tip and the sample is minimized.

Immuno-PCR

Serial dilutions of mouse IgG model antigen (Sigma, St Louis, MO) were immobilized in wells of TopYield modules (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) as previously reported (8). For conventional IPCR employing successive reagent addition, biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Coulter Immunotech, Hamburg, Germany) was used at 1.5 µg/ml, with 2 µg/ml STV (IBA) and biotinylated dsDNA at 5 pM. Each of the incubation steps was carried out for 1 h at room temperature with 30 µl of reagent dilutions in buffer C (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.3, containing 5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween). In some cases (Fig. 5B), mouse IgG antigen was first coupled with an unlabeled primary antibody (rabbit anti-mouse whole sera; Sigma), and subsequently with the biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody. After the final wash with buffer C, PCR was carried out using the conditions decribed above, except that 28 thermal cycles were performed. In addition, a biotinylated primer was used and the PCR reaction mixture (30 µl/well) contained 2 nM 11-digoxi-genin-dUTP (Roche) to allow for quantification of the PCR amplification products using the microplate-based fluorescence PCR-ELISA detection assay previously described (8). In order to use the oligomeric DNA-STV complexes as reagents for IPCR, the surface-immobilized antigen was labeled with biotinylated antibody, and subsequently, the oligomeric complex obtained from 3 and 1 molar equivalent of STV, diluted to a final concentration of 5 pM in buffer C, was added to the wells, and the plate was incubated for 30 min. PCR and quantification of the amplification products were carried out as described above. To use the antibody-containing oligomeric reagent in IPCR a solution of the IgG-modified oligomer containing ~20 nM dsDNA 3 was diluted 1:80 in buffer C. Incubation times, PCR and quantification were as described above.

RESULTS

Self-assembly of the DNA-STV complexes

Four bis-biotinylated DNA fragments, 86 (1), 124 (2), 169 (3) and 256 (4) bp dsDNA, were synthesized by preparative PCR using two 5[prime]-biotin-derivatized primer oligonucleotides. Mono-biotinylated dsDNA fragments of 86 (1a), 169 (3a) and 256 (4a) bp were similarly prepared using one 5[prime]-biotin-derivatized and one unlabeled primer. The dsDNA products were purified by gel filtration chromatography, quantified by photometry and characterized by non-denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of a DNA molecular weight standard. In a first set of experiments, the DNA products were mixed with various amounts of recombinant STV, ranging from 100:1 down to 0.2:1 molar equivalents of STV and DNA, respectively. A typical gel image obtained from DNA 3 is shown in Figure 2. Samples containing two or more molar equivalents of DNA reveal only a few bands, representing the mono-, bis- and tris-adducts of the biotinylated DNA and STV, as indicated from the comparison with appropriate controls prepared from mono-biotinylated DNA and STV. Quantitation of the bands obtained from the mono-biotinylated DNA showed that even with a 5-fold molar excess of DNA, the tris- and tetra-adducts are only present in small amounts; ~10 and 5% of the total signal intensity of the STV adducts. This indicates that STV predominantly behaves as a bivalent linker molecule, despite its tetravalent binding capacity. With a typical, sharp change at ~2 molar equivalents of DNA, an increase in the relative amount of STV leads to the formation of a highly characteristic broad, blurry band, appearing in the high molecular weight range. The intensity of this band reaches its maximum at an equimolar coupling stoichiometry. At this point, an immobile high molecular weight band is evident, likely representing highly oligomerized DNA-STV networks. A further increase in the relative amount of STV leads to the formation of a fingerprint-like set of bands, indicating the presence of multiple relatively small DNA-protein complexes comprised of varying amounts of the two constituents. The second change is also quite sharp, and it is reached at ~0.7 molar equivalents of DNA. Thus, the presence of excess STV prevents the formation of highly oligomerized networks, and instead, a variety of individual molecular complexes are generated. The stoichiometry dependence of complex formation is highly reproducible, and the three well-distinguishable states of self-assembly are also evident in similar experiments employing the shorter and longer DNA fragments 1, 2 and 4, respectively, at the same concentrations.


Figure 2. Self-assembly of bis-biotinylated DNA and STV. This is an inverted representation of an ethidium bromide stained non-denaturing 1.5% agarose gel. Lanes 1-6 contain mixtures of 169 bp bis-biotinylated dsDNA 3 with decreasing amounts of STV. The relative molar ratios are indicated at the top of the lanes. Note the two sharp changes occuring between lanes 3 and 5, when the fingerprint-like band pattern (lane 3) becomes an immobile band (lane 4) which is disrupted at a 2-fold molar amount of dsDNA (lane 5). For comparison, monomeric controls consisting of STV and DNA 3a were applied to the gel in lanes 7-9. The small letters on the right indicate the mobilities observed for free dsDNA 3a (a) and the mono- (b) bis- (c), tris- (d) and tetra-adducts (e) of 3a with STV. Lane M contains a DNA molecular weight marker. The lengths are indicated as base pairs.

Further electrophoretic experiments were carried out to investigate the kinetics of complex formation and also potential dynamic exchanges between the complexes. No substantial difference in band pattern was observed for mixtures of dsDNA, such as 3, and either 1 or 2 molar equivalents of STV that were allowed to react either for ~2 min at 4°C or ~24 h at room temperature. This indicates that formation of the supramolecular complexes is fast. To further elucidate the assembly process, experiments were carried out to test whether exchange occurs between pre-assembled DNA-STV complexes. For instance, two different complexes, prepared from either 1 or 3 and 1 or 2 molar equivalents of STV in separate tubes, were mixed and incubated for up to 24 h. Gel electrophoretic analysis shows that only the two fingerprint-like sets of bands of the pre-assembled complexes are present in these mixtures, and no additional bands of mixed species can be detected. It was also observed that a subsequent addition of excess STV to a preformed equimolar complex did not destroy the typical high molecular weight immobile band visible in Figure 2, lane 4. This indicates that exchange of the dsDNA between the complexes is very slow. To investigate the influence of the coupling ratio on such putative exchange processes, similar experiments were carried out with preformed adducts of STV and mono-biotinylated dsDNAs, such as 1a or 3a. In agreement with the results obtained from bis-biotinylated DNA, no exchange was detected when the molar amount of STV was equal to or greater than that of DNA. In contrast, an excess of DNA leads to the occurrence of novel bands of mixed species containing both DNA 1a and 3a already after 5 min. This indicates that free dsDNA induces a fast exchange between the two DNA-STV complexes.

The coupling of further biotinylated compounds with preformed DNA-STV oligomeric complexes was studied by electrophoresis. These experiments are of particular interest with respect to the utilization of the oligomers as reagents in IPCR assays. A low molecular weight compound, i.e. 5 molar equivalents of D-biotin, as well as 2 molar equivalents of a biotinylated antibody (bIgG), were mixed with the oligomeric complexes, previously generated from 3 or 3a and STV (Fig. 3). The complexes obtained from a 1:2 molar ratio of 3 and STV react with bIgG, leading to the formation of an immobile band that indicates the formation of high molecular weight DNA-protein aggregates (Fig. 3, lane 6). The coupling of bIgG with complexes generated from 3 and an equimolar amount of STV, however, leads to partial disruption of the high molecular weight product, and instead, novel bands of lower molecular weight appear (Fig. 3, lane 3). Coupling experiments with monomeric STV adducts containing monobiotinylated DNA 3a reveal that in particular mono-adducts containing one DNA fragment per STV have sufficient residual binding capacity for the additional attachment of a voluminous macromolecule (Fig. 3, lanes 9 and 12). In contrast, the addition of D-biotin neither affects the band patterns obtained from a 1:2 molar ratio of 3 and STV (lanes 4 and 5) nor of 3a and various molar equivalents of STV. However, significant changes can be observed when oligomeric networks pre-assembled from 3 and an equimolar amount of STV are challenged with D-biotin. This leads to almost complete disruption of the immobile band, and instead, complexes of lower molecular weight are visible (Fig. 3, lane 2).


Figure 3. Coupling of preformed DNA-STV complexes with biotin compounds. This is an inverted representation of an ethidium bromide stained non-denaturing 2% agarose gel. Lanes 1-6 contain mixtures of 169 bp bis-biotinylated dsDNA 3 and 1 or 2 molar equivalents of STV; lanes 7-12 contain analogous samples prepared from mono-biotinylated DNA 3a. Addition of the small ligand D-biotin only influences the immobile band obtained from the equimolar mixture of bis-biotinylated DNA and STV in lane 2, while the other complexes in lanes 5, 8 and 11 are not affected. Addition of bIgG to the preformed oligomeric complexes in lanes 3 and 6 influences the complexes obtained from a 1:2 molar ratio containing terminal, monovalent STV molecules. The entire fingerprint-like band pattern is retarded. In contrast, the intensity of the immobile product band (lane 1) obtained from the equimolar dsDNA/STV mixture is reduced, and instead, distinct individual bands are visible. Note that the mono-adduct of DNA 3a and STV (b) completely disappears upon addion of bIgG, while the intensity of the bis-adduct (c) is only slightly reduced (lanes 9 and 12). Positions a, d and e indicate the mobilities observed for free dsDNA 3a and the tris- and tetra-adducts of 3a with STV, respectively. Lane M contains a DNA molecular weight marker. The lengths are indicated as base pairs.

AFM imaging

To study the structures of the oligomeric DNA-protein complexes, samples were imaged using dynamic AFM working in attractive regime mode. Representative images are shown in Figure 4, and statistical analysis of the complexes observed are given in Tables 1 and 2. As expected, the distance between two adjacent STV molecules varies with the length of the DNA incorporated into the networks. For DNAs 1-4, the distances observed correlate well with the lengths calculated for a DNA double-helix in B-conformation (Table 1). Statistical evaluation indicated that the length of the DNA fragment and the molar ratio DNA:STV influence both the size of the linear oligomers and also the amount and size of supramolecular cycles (Table 1). The largest complexes are observed for DNA 3, containing on average about eight dsDNA fragments per complex. The valency of STV is found to be sensitive only to variations in the coupling stoichiometry (Table 2) and independent of the dsDNA length (Table 1). A decrease in the relative amount of DNA induces a significant decrease in the valency of the STV molecules. This is important, since the monovalent, terminal STV moieties of the supramolecular complexes are the potential binding sites for subsequent coupling with biotinylated antibodies, as determined by gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3). The AFM data provided answers to questions posed by electrophoresis. For instance, immobile structures and fingerprint band patterns found at DNA:STV 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1, respectively (Fig. 2), suggest variations in supramolecular structures. At a 2:1 molar coupling stoichiometry of DNA:STV oligomeric complexes with relatively high amounts of trivalent and tetravalent STV were seen (Table 2). High valency of STV molecules functioning as branch points within the supramolecular complexes resulted in the largest structures, containing up to 40 dsDNA fragments (Fig. 4A). However, these samples also contain considerable amounts of free DNA. A comparison of the electrophoresis and AFM data indicates the presence of either ~80 or 20% free dsDNA, respectively. With respect to the electrophoretic results of Figure 3, this suggests that the large supramolecular networks are fragile, and thus tend to disrupt during the physical stress of electrophoretic separation. The presence of free DNA, and thus, the appearance of less oligomeric aggregates, also explains the decrease in the intensity of the immobile band, observed in the electrophoresis of oligomers consisting of equimolar amounts of DNA and STV (Fig. 2, lanes 4 and 5). In the AFM images, the formation of supramolecular rings is evident, resulting in geometrically stable arrays (Fig. 4C). The ratio of circular to linear complexes is influenced by variations in the coupling stoichiometry of dsDNA and STV (Table 2) and was found to be at a maximum at around an equimolar concentration. The amount of cyclic structures also increases with decreasing length of the bridging DNA. Furthermore, the number of dsDNA fragments that form such supramolecular rings is higher for short DNA fragments (Table 1).


Figure 4. AFM visualization of the oligomeric DNA-STV complexes investigated in this study. Representative images are shown in this diagram. (A) Overwiew image of a sample containing STV and dsDNA 3 in a molar ratio of 1:2. (B) Topographical view of a linear DNA-STV oligomer of STV and dsDNA 3, containing a single trivalent STV branch point. (C) Topographical view showing isolated supramolecular cyclic structures consisting of STV and dsDNA 2, indicated by arrows. More than 10% of the total number of complexes reveal such isolated cyclic structures. (D) Topographical view of small linear DNA-STV oligomers obtained from samples of dsDNA 3 and 5 molar equivalents of STV. Note that most of the complexes contain monovalent STV moieties attached to their termini.


Figure 5. Performance of the oligomeric DNA-protein complexes as reagents in IPCR. These are plots of relative signal intensities versus the amount of antigen to be detected. The various IPCR formats are schematically indicated in the boxed inserts of the figures. (A) Direct detection of rabbit IgG using sequential IPCR in which the immuno complex was assembled in situ by stepwise addition of the antibody, STV and dsDNA 3 (dashed line b), sequential ELISA (dotted line c), or IPCR in which the biotinylated antibody was coupled with a preformed oligomeric DNA-STV complex consisting of equimolar amounts of dsDNA 3 and STV (line a). (B) IPCR detection of mouse IgG using an unlabeled primary antibody and a biotinylated secondary antibody. Sequential IPCR in which the primary antibody was coupled with the secondary antibody, STV and dsDNA 3 (dashed line b), the analogous sequential ELISA (dotted line c), and IPCR in which a preformed oligomeric complex consisting of 1:1:2 molar amounts of the biotinylated antibody, dsDNA 3 and STV (line a) are compared.

Table 1. Statistical analysis of AFM images of oligomeric complexes obtained from STV and 0.5 molar equivalents of the various dsDNA 1-4
  dsDNA
  1 2 3 4
Number ofa        
   Complexes 71 64 123 81
   STV 209 189 318 127
   dsDNA 187 185 338 256
DNA lengthcalculated (nm)b 29.24 42.16 57.80 87.04
DNA lengthmeasured (nm) 27.5 ± 5.5 43.1 ± 5.0 53.8 ± 9.3 82.8 ± 5.1
Sizemax (DNA/complex)c) 9 8 18 12
Sizeaverage (DNA/complex)d) 4.9 5.6 8.2 6.2
Valency of STV (%)        
   Monovalent STV 26 31 21 31
   Divalent STV 65 65 64 58
   Trivalent STV 8 4 13 9
   Tetravalent STV 1 0 2 2
Cyclic complexes (%)e 7 18 5 5
Ring sizeaverage (DNA/ring) 3.2 3.5 3.0 2.2
aTotal number of molecules counted.
bDNA length was calculated assuming a double helix in the B-conformation.
cMaximum size of the supramolecular complexes; note that the largest complexes contain branch points formed by trivalent STV molecules as shown in Figure 4B.
dAverage size of the supramolecular complexes.
eCyclic complexes shown in Figure 4C may also occur as substructures of branched complexes.

Table 2. Statistical analysis of AFM images of oligomeric complexes obtained from dsDNA 3 and various relative amounts of STV
  Coupling ratio 3:STV
  2:1 1:1 1:2 1:5
Number ofa        
   Complexes 232 105 432 190
   STV 987 420 1116 430
   dsDNA 1701 521 1161 417
Ratio (DNA/STV)b 1.74:1 1.24:1 1.04:1 1:1.03
Sizemax (DNA/complex)c 38 27 18 6
Sizeaveraged        
   DNA/complex 7.3 5.0 2.6 2.2
   DNA/branched complexe 10.7 9.0 8.2 3.8
Valency of STV (%)        
   Monovalent STV 5 12 20 43
   Divalent STV 37 44 64 42
   Trivalent STV 43 37 13 14
   Tetravalent STV 15 7 3 1
Linear complexes (%) 36 42 75 84
Branched complexes (%)e 60 42 14 16
Cyclic complexes (%)f 31 45 5 0
aTotal number of molecules counted.
bMolar ratio of dsDNA and STV within the supramolecular complexes; note that an approximately equimolar ratio is observed even with a high excess of STV.
cMaximum size of the supramolecular complexes.
dAverage size of the supramolecular complexes; note that for excess dsDNA high amounts of uncoupled DNA are present.
eWhile linear complexes contain only mono- and divalent STV, branched complexes accommodate trivalent and tetravalent STV branch points.
fSince cyclic complexes often occur as substructures of branched complexes, the sum of the percentage values may exceed 100%.

When the DNA:STV ratio was decreased to 1:2, more linear conjugates were seen (Table 2 and Fig. 4B). As a striking feature, STV dominantly serves as a bivalent linker in these complexes, thus linear aggregates with only a few trivalent STV branch points are present in addition to cyclic species (Fig. 4C). The patterned bands observed in electrophoretic analysis of such samples (Fig. 2) are explainable by a population of rarely branched, linear structures with various numbers of DNA fragments predominantly containing monovalent STV moieties at their termini (Fig. 4D). Antibody-containing complexes have also been imaged by AFM. These aggregates display highly globular structures with significant z-extension. Average particle sizes ranging from 200 to 400 nm in diameter are observed, suggesting that coupling of the polybiotinylated antibody yields an extensive 3-dimensional linkage of several preformed DNA-STV oligomeric complexes, extending as chain-like structures from some of the globular aggregates.

DNA-protein networks as reagents in IPCR

The supramolecular DNA-protein networks were evaluated for their performance as reagents in IPCR (Fig. 5). Initially, the influence of the coupling ratio of dsDNA and STV on performance of the supramolecular complexes as IPCR reagents was tested in a direct IPCR assay. Serial dilutions of rabbit IgG model antigen were immobilized as targets in a microplate. The antigen was coupled with a specific biotinylated antibody, goat anti-rabbit IgG, and subsequently labeled with oligomeric DNA-STV complexes, pre-assembled from DNA 3 and varying relative amounts of STV. Strikingly, a significantly reduced background signal was evident in all IPCR experiments employing the DNA-STV oligomers. The best sensitivity and also the highest signal intensities were obtained using oligomers generated from equimolar coupling mixtures of 3 and STV in which the largest oligomeric networks are present (Fig. 2, lane 4). In a similar set of experiments, the influence of the lengths of the DNA fragments incorporated in the DNA-protein complexes was studied. For this, the IPCR detection of rabbit IgG was achieved with oligomeric aggregates obtained from STV and 1 molar equivalent of the various DNAs 1-4. The performance of the supramolecular DNA-protein complexes depended on the length of the DNA incorporated. The use of DNA 3 gave best results, and neither a shorter, e.g. 2, nor a longer dsDNA, e.g. 4, led to increased sensitivity and signal intensities. The control reactions indicated that all DNAs have a similar amplification efficiency during PCR. In agreement with the AFM observation that dsDNA 3 forms the largest oligomers (Table 1), the different IPCR performance thus correlates with structural features of the supramolecular complexes.

Figure 5A demonstrates the power of the supramolecular DNA-STV complexes as reagents in IPCR. Use of the oligomers was compared with a conventional IPCR, in which surface-immobilized antigen was coupled in three steps with a specific biotinylated antibody, STV and DNA 3, or else, with the analogous ELISA, employing alkaline phosphatase as the marker enzyme. Although the sequential IPCR protocol already leads to a significantly enhanced detection sensitivity by about three orders of magnitude, use of the DNA-STV oligomeric complexes still improves the performance of IPCR by enhancing the signal intensities and sensitivity ~10-fold. Following this, pre-assembled DNA-STV complexes containing a biotinylated antibody were tested in highly demanding IPCR applications. In Figure 5B, the detection of mouse IgG model antigen was performed using a specific, unlabeled antibody which is available only as a crude preparation in mouse whole serum. In such cases it is necessary to employ a biotinylated secondary antibody. The sequential two-step coupling of a biotinylated secondary antibody and a supramolecular oligomer of STV and DNA 3 was compared with the use of a preformed, supramolecular complex of the three components. As a control, a regular ELISA was carried out, in which biotinylated secondary antibody, STV and biotinylated alkaline phosphatase were used for antigen detection. The curves shown in Figure 5B clearly indicate a superior performance of the immunoglobulin-containing supramolecular reagent, leading to an ~100-fold enhanced sensitivity. A similar construct, employed as a reagent for the detection of a lectin from mistletoe using a sandwich IPCR assay, revealed similar enhancements in sensitivity and signal intensity.

DISCUSSION

Self-assembly of DNA-STV complexes

The object of this work was to exploit self-assembled supramolecular complexes, formed from the tetravalent binding protein STV and divalent, bis-biotinylated dsDNA, and to determine whether these complexes can be utilized for applications in molecular biotechnology, such as IPCR. On the assumption that the tetravalent binding capacity of STV combined with its extremely high affinity for biotin would lead to the formation of 3-dimensionally linked networks, our results provide surprising insights into the highly studied (strept)avidin-biotin recognition system. As a prominent conclusion, the tetravalent protein displays a high preference for acting as a bivalent linker molecule, with the formation of tris-adducts being disfavored. Tetra-adducts are rarely detected, neither by electrophoretic analyses nor by AFM imaging. The restricted formation of tetra-adducts, previously reported for the binding of short single-stranded DNA oligomers (26), indicates that electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged phosphate backbone contributes to destabilization of the STV adducts, in addition to the sterical demand of the double helical DNA fragment. Our results also allow conclusions regarding the kinetics of oligomer formation and exchange processes within the DNA-STV networks. Formation of the supramolecular aggregates is rather fast, occurring within minutes, while exchange of dsDNA between preformed complexes is very slow, as long as the amount of bis-biotinylated dsDNA does not exceed 1 molar equivalent of STV. Under these conditions, the system behaves in accord with observations for the binding of biotin by (strept)avidin (27). In contrast, an enhanced exchange dynamic is observed when the amount of dsDNA-bound biotin is >2-fold higher than STV. This result suggests that addition of a third dsDNA fragment to a bis-adduct weakens the binding strength of the other fragments, and thus, causes enhanced dissociation. This mechanism is in agreement with both the biphasic dissociation reported earlier for binding of biotin nitroxide derivatives (28) and the affinity decrease for the binding of biotinylated macromolecules (29). The mechanism also explains the lack of high molecular weight complexes in mixtures containing excess bis-biotinylated dsDNA.

AFM imaging of nanostructures

Direct analysis of the self-assembled complexes by means of AFM imaging has provided detailed insights regarding the connectivity and composition of the supramolecular DNA-STV networks. This is of great importance for the further development of such nanostructures since it allows conclusions regarding the localization and availability of potential binding sites that can be utilized for the attachment of ligands, for instance, biotinylated antibodies. This work represents the first imaging of a semi-synthetic DNA-protein network. Recently, a few examples of AFM characterization of synthetic 1-dimensional DNA geometrical objects (16) and 2-dimensional periodic DNA arrays (15,17) have been reported. Fortunately, the length of the dsDNA spacers between adjacent proteins can be adjusted in the DNA-STV system to allow for detailed imaging analysis of the nanostructured networks. For instance, the 30 nm spacings obtained with the 86 bp dsDNA 1 has permitted the clear structural discrimination of individual protein molecules, while the use of a 46 bp dsDNA linker was not sufficient. It has been noted that AFM would need far better resolution to obtain detailed information about individual molecules (16), but it can clearly distinguish the components of some biomolecular complexes ocurring, for instance, during enzymatic processing of nucleic acids (30,31). This study emphasizes the increasingly important role of AFM for the structural analysis of complex populations of artificial biomolecules formed by self-assembly.

Applications

The self-assembled oligomeric DNA-STV networks studied here are suitable reagents for IPCR. A high number of DNA fragments are intrinsically linked with a similar number of target binding sites, the latter allowing for affinity enhancement by increased avidity. The isolated DNA-STV oligomers, however, are not yet optimal for this purpose since binding with bulky biotinylated macromolecules preferentially occurs at the monovalently attached STVs, located at the termini of the supramolecular oligomers. Nevertheless, the coupling of polybiotinylated antibodies produces aggregates that are highly efficient IPCR reagents. The exact composition and structure determination of these complexes, however, is beyond the capabilities of currently available techniques. To generate molecular constructs of even higher versatility, a more distinguishable and possibly more efficient attachment of large numbers of bulky functional moieties might be attained from the incorporation of covalent DNA-STV hybrid molecules (19) as distinct building blocks in self-assembled oligomeric networks. This option supplements the capabilities of the DNA-STV aggregates to serve as a molecular framework for the attachment and selective positioning of biotinylated functional moieties, such as proteins (22), inorganic metal nanoclusters (20) or low molecular weight peptides and fluorophores (26). We anticipate that further exploration of nucleic acid- and STV-based recognition systems will open new routes to the fabrication of man-made biomaterials useful for sensory transduction, preparative biocatalytic transformations, and other applications in supramolecular chemistry and biotechnology.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

See Supplementary Material available at NAR Online (902 KB PDF File). Images obtained from: gel electrophoresis of dsDNAs 1-4 with varying amounts of STV; electrophoretic analysis of the exchange processes; AFM imaging of the various dsDNAs; various coupling ratios and preformed, antibody-containing DNA-STV complexes; gel filtration chromatograms; IPCR illustrating the influences of DNA length and coupling stoichiometry; a sandwich IPCR for lectin detection.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants Ni399/4-1 to C.M.N. and Ch144/1-1 to L.F.C. and H.F. from Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft, SSP 1072, and from Tönjes-Vagt Stiftung to D.B. B.P. thanks MURST (Rome) for financial support.

REFERENCES

1. Sano, T., Smith,C.L. and Cantor,C.R. (1992) Science, 258, 120-122. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Ruzicka, V., März,W., Russ,A. and Gross,W. (1993) Science, 260, 260-261.

3. Zhou, H., Fisher,R.J. and Papas,T.S. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 6038-6039. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Hendrickson, E.R., Hatfield,T.M., Truby,T.M., Joerger,R.D., Majarian,W.R. and Ebersole,R.C. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 522-529. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Sanna, P.P., Weiss,F., Samson,M.E., Bloom,F.E. and Pich,E.M. (1995) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 272-275. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Maia, M., Takahashi,H., Adler,K., Garlick,R.K. and Wands,J.R. (1995) J. Virol. Methods, 52, 273-286. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Kakizaki, E., Yoshida,T., Kawakami,H., Oseto,M., Sakai,T. and Sakai,M. (1996) Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 23, 101-103. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Niemeyer, C.M., Adler,M. and Blohm,D. (1997) Anal. Biochem., 246, 140-145. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Bodemer, W. (1999) Naturwissenschaften, 86, 212-220. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Sano, T., Smith,C.L. and Cantor,C.R. (1993) Science, 260, 699.

11. Whitesides, G.M., Mathias,J.P. and Seto,C.T. (1991) Science, 254, 1312-1319. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Seeman, N.C. (1982) J. Theor. Biol., 99, 237-247. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Seeman, N.C. (1998) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 37, 3220-3238.

14. Niemeyer, C.M. (1997) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 36, 585-587.

15. Winfree, E., Furong,L., Wenzler,L.A. and Seeman,N.C. (1998) Nature, 394, 539-544. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Yang, X., Wenzler,L.A., Qi,J., Li,X. and Seeman,N.C. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 9779-9786.

17. Furong, L., Sha,R. and Seeman,N.C. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 917-922.

18. Mao, C., Sun,W., Shen,Z. and Seeman,N.C. (1999) Nature, 397, 144-146. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Niemeyer, C.M., Sano,T., Smith,C.L. and Cantor,C.R. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 5530-5539. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Niemeyer, C.M., Bürger,W. and Peplies,J. (1998) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 37, 2265-2268.

21. Niemeyer, C.M., Bürger,W. and Hoedemakers,R.M.J. (1998) Bioconjugate Chem., 9, 168-175.

22. Niemeyer, C.M., Boldt,L., Ceyhan,B. and Blohm,D. (1999) Anal. Biochem., 268, 54-63. MEDLINE Abstract

23. Mammen, M., Choi,S.-K. and Whitesides,G.M. (1998) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 37, 2754-2794.

24. Li, J., Bai,C., Wang,C., Zhu,C., Lin,Z., Li,Q. and Cao,E. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 4785-4786. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Anczykowski, B., Cleveland,J.P., Krüger,D., Elings,V. and Fuchs,H. (1998) Appl. Phys., 66A, 885.

26. Niemeyer, C.M., Ceyhan,B. and Blohm,D. (1999) Bioconjugate Chem., 10, 708-719.

27. Piran, U. and Riordan,W.J. (1990) J. Immunol. Methods, 133, 141-143. MEDLINE Abstract

28. Sinha, B.K. and Chignell,C.F. (1979) Methods Enzymol., 62, 295-308. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Vincent, P. and Samuel,D. (1993) J. Immunol. Methods, 165, 177-182. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Kasas, S., Thomson,N.H., Smith,B.L., Hansma,H.G., Zhu,X.S., Guthold,M., Bustamante,C., Kool,E.T., Kashlev,M. and Hansma,P.K. (1997) Biochemistry, 36, 461-468. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Thomson, N.H., Smith,B.L., Almqvist,N., Schmitt,L., Kashlev,M., Kool,E.T. and Hansma,P.K. (1999) Biophys. J., 76, 1024-1033. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 421 218 4911; Fax: +49 421 218 7578; Email: cmn{at}biotec.uni-bremen.de Permanent address: Bruno Pignataro, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Universitá di Catania, Via le A. Doria, 6-95125 Catania, Italy


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: jnl.info{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification:
Copyright© Oxford University Press, 1999.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. van den Hout, S. Hage, C. Dekker, and N. H. Dekker
End-joining long nucleic acid polymers
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2008; 36(16): e104 - e104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. D. Keating
Nanoscience enables ultrasensitive detection of Alzheimer's biomarker
PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2263 - 2264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Banin, S. M. Wilson, and C. J. Stanley
Demonstration of an Alternative Approach to Immuno-PCR
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2004; 50(10): 1932 - 1934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Gullberg, S. M. Gustafsdottir, E. Schallmeiner, J. Jarvius, M. Bjarnegard, C. Betsholtz, U. Landegren, and S. Fredriksson
Cytokine detection by antibody-based proximity ligation
PNAS, June 1, 2004; 101(22): 8420 - 8424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J.-M. Nam, C. S. Thaxton, and C. A. Mirkin
Nanoparticle-Based Bio-Bar Codes for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Proteins
Science, September 26, 2003; 301(5641): 1884 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. M. Niemeyer, R. Wacker, and M. Adler
Combination of DNA-directed immobilization and immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of self-assembled DNA-protein conjugates
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): e90 - e90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
T. I. Rokitskaya, E. A. Kotova, and Y. N. Antonenko
Tandem Gramicidin Channels Cross-linked by Streptavidin
J. Gen. Physiol., April 28, 2003; 121(5): 463 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (535K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (82)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niemeyer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niemeyer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blohm, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nucleic acid amplification
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?