Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (585K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research Pages 1251-1262  


FBI-1, a factor that binds to the HIV-1 inducer of short transcripts (IST), is a POZ domain protein
Introduction
Materials And Methods
   Large-scale purification of FBI-1
   Isolation of cDNAs encoding FBI-1
   Plasmid constructs
   Generation of anti-peptide antibodies
   In vitro immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting
   In vivo immunoprecipitations
   Expression of GST fusion proteins
   EMSA
Results
   FBI-1 is a POZ domain protein
   FBI-1 is part of the IST complex
   Recombinant FBI-1 co-migrates with the endogenous protein
   FBI-1 binds to the IST element, and the first and second zinc fingers are absolutely required for binding
   FBI-1 self-associates in solution
   The FBI-1 POZ domain self-associates both in vitro and in vivo
   The FBI-1 C-terminal end containing the zinc finger domain self-associates in vivo but not in vitro
   FBI-1 associates with Tat in vivo
Discussion
   FBI-1 is a POZ domain protein
   What is the role of FBI-1?
Acknowledgements
References


FBI-1, a factor that binds to the HIV-1 inducer of short transcripts (IST), is a POZ domain protein

FBI-1, a factor that binds to the HIV-1 inducer of short transcripts (IST), is a POZ domain protein

Debra J. Morrison2,3, P. Shannon Pendergrast3, Peter Stavropoulos1,2, Serafin U. Colmenares3, Ryuji Kobayashi3 and Nouria Hernandez3,4,*

1Undergraduate Program, 2Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA and 3Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA

Received as resubmission January 4, 1999; Accepted January 18, 1999

ABSTRACT

The HIV-1 promoter directs the synthesis of two classes of transcripts, short, non-polyadenylated transcripts and full-length, polyadenylated transcripts. The synthesis of short transcripts is activated by a bipartite DNA element, the inducer of short transcripts or IST, located downstream of the HIV-1 transcriptional start site, while the synthesis of full-length transcripts is activated by the viral activator Tat. Tat binds to the RNA element TAR, which is encoded largely between the two IST half-elements. Upon activation by Tat, the synthesis of short RNAs is repressed. We have previously purified a factor called FBI-1 (for factor that binds to IST) whose binding to wild-type and mutated ISTs correlated well with the abilities of these ISTs to direct the synthesis of short transcripts. Here, we report the cloning of cDNAs encoding FBI-1. FBI-1 contains a POZ domain at its N-terminus and four Krüppel-type zinc fingers at its C-terminus. The C-terminus is sufficient for specific binding, and FBI-1 can form homomers through its POZ domain and, in vivo, through its zinc finger domain as well. In addition, FBI-1 associates with Tat, suggesting that repression of the short transcripts by Tat may be mediated through interactions between the two factors.

INTRODUCTION

During the synthesis of mRNAs by RNA polymerase II, many stages can be targets for regulation. Several eukaryotic and viral transcription units are regulated at the level of elongation. Included among them is the HIV-1 transcription unit, which is regulated at the level of both transcription initiation and transcription elongation (1-6; for review see 7).

The HIV-1 promoter can generate two types of RNA molecules, short, non-polyadenylated transcripts and full-length, polyadenylated transcripts, as determined by nuclear run-on assays and steady-state RNA analyses in vivo (1,2,8-11), as well as transcription studies in vitro (12). The short transcripts correspond to RNAs with heterogenous 3[prime] ends located around position +60, and contain the TAR element, the binding site for the viral trans-activator Tat. In the absence of Tat, they represent the majority of the RNA molecules synthesized from the HIV-1 promoter. In the presence of Tat, the amounts of short transcripts are decreased while the amounts of full-length transcripts are dramatically increased (1,9). Repression of the short transcripts upon Tat trans-activation depends specifically on Tat being targeted to the TAR RNA element. Indeed, if instead Tat is targeted to an upstream GAL4 DNA binding site by fusion to the GAL4 DNA binding domain, the synthesis of both full-length and short transcripts is activated (13).

In the wild-type HIV-1 promoter, efficient synthesis of the short transcripts is dependent on a bipartite DNA element, known as the inducer of short transcripts or IST, located just downstream of the start site of transcription (9). IST consists of two half sites, one of which (the 5[prime] half-site) is more important for IST function than the other (11). The IST activates transcription from the HIV-1 promoter, but the RNAs resulting from this activation of transcription are short. Thus, IST seems to stimulate the formation of transcription elongation complexes that are not capable of efficient elongation. Formation of the 3[prime] ends of the short transcripts has recently been shown to depend in part on an alternative RNA structure (the HIV-1 pause hairpin) that competes with formation of TAR (14). The role of IST and the short transcripts during the virus life cycle is not known. Because the short transcripts contain TAR, IST activity may regulate Tat trans-activation. Indeed, over-expression of short transcripts from heterologous promoters inhibits Tat trans-activation in transfected cells (15,16) and viral replication in HIV-1 infected cells (17). It is also possible, however, that the role of IST is to maintain the HIV-1 promoter in an open configuration, ready to respond quickly to activators, in much the same way that the presence of an engaged RNA polymerase II in some of the heat shock promoters allows very rapid response to heat shock (18).

The characterization of IST as a DNA element that functions in the absence of any HIV-1 viral product (9,11) suggested that IST might function by recruiting a cellular factor. We previously reported the identification and purification of a cellular factor, which we refer to as FBI-1, whose binding to wild-type and mutated versions of the IST element correlated well with the abilities of these various ISTs to support short transcript synthesis in vivo and in vitro (12,19). Biochemical purification as well as UV-crosslinking studies suggested that a polypeptide migrating with an apparent molecular weight of 86 kDa (p86) was part of the FBI-1 activity (19).

Here, we report the cloning and characterization of p86, and show that this polypeptide indeed corresponds to FBI-1. FBI-1 is a Krüppel-type zinc finger protein which contains at its N-terminus a POZ (for poxvirus and zinc fingers) domain (20). The POZ domain, also known as the BTB (for broad complex, tramtrack, bric à brac) domain (21) or TAB (for tramtrack-associated box) domain (22), is a 120 amino acid conserved motif which is often located at the N-terminus of Krüppel-type zinc finger transcription factors. Examples of such transcription factors include: (i) BCL-6/LAZ3, a protein whose gene is rearranged in most cases of diffuse large cell lymphomas (23-29), (ii) the PLZF protein, portions of which are fused to RAR[alpha] in a subset of acute promyelocytic leukemia (30,31) and (iii) the Drosophila GAGA factor, a transcriptional activator (32) which contains a single zinc finger (33,34) and which is required for normal expression of several homeotic genes (35). POZ domains can associate to form homomeric or heterodimeric complexes (20). We show that FBI-1 can associate with itself in vivo and in vitro through the POZ domain and, in vivo, through the zinc finger domain as well. In addition, FBI-1 associates with Tat.

BCL-6 and PLZF have been shown to associate with the co-repressor SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptor) (36) and may, therefore, be involved in chromatin remodeling by recruiting a histone deacetylase through the SMRT-mSin3-HDAC complex (37-40). Furthermore, the GAGA factor, which appears to be required for RNA polymerase pausing at heat shock promoters (41; for review see 18), is involved in chromatin remodeling (42-45). The identification of FBI-1 as a POZ domain protein raises the possibility that this factor is involved in establishing a chromatin configuration on the HIV-1 promoter compatible with the synthesis of short transcripts. The observation that FBI-1 can interact with Tat further suggest that down-regulation of the short transcripts upon Tat trans-activation may involve protein-protein contacts between the two factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Large-scale purification of FBI-1

FBI-1 purification was carried out essentially as described in (19) with the following modifications. After fractionation over a 10 ml hydroxyapatite column, 11.5 ml of pooled fractions containing IST binding activity were dialyzed to equilibrium against 3 l of buffer D100 (without MgCl2), adjusted to 5 mM MgCl2 and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with an equal volume of protein G-agarose beads crosslinked to the anti-TBP monoclonal antibody SL39a (46). The beads were pelleted by gentle centrifugation and washed five times in 10 vol of buffer D100. Peptide elutions were carried out by incubation of the beads with gentle mixing for 30 min in two bead volumes of buffer D100 containing 1 mg/ml of a specific peptide (CSH 381) carrying the epitope recognized by SL39a (46). The eluate was then loaded on a 200 µl SP-Sepharose mini column previously equilibrated with buffer D140. The column was washed with buffer D140, the bound proteins were eluted with 10 column vol of buffer D450 and 100 µl fractions were collected. Fractions containing IST-binding activity were pooled, precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (100% TCA + 0.4% deoxycholate), resuspended in 40 µl of 5× Laemmli buffer (47) and loaded in one lane of a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained with 0.05% Coomassie Blue G for 15 min, destained and soaked in water for 1 h. A protein migrating with an apparent molecular weight of 86 kDa was excised from the gel and digested in situ with lysylendopeptidase. The resulting peptides were separated by reverse-phase HPLC and sequenced with an ABI automated protein sequencer as previously described (48).

Isolation of cDNAs encoding FBI-1

A search of the EST database with the various FBI-1 peptide sequences obtained above identified a partial cDNA capable of encoding two of the FBI-1 peptides as well as part of a third one. Specific oligonucleotide primers were designed based on this sequence and used to amplify by PCR a 355 bp DNA fragment from human cDNA prepared from poly(A)+ RNA. This fragment was then radiolabeled with [[alpha]-32P]dCTP by the random primer method and used to screen a [lambda]gt10 human cDNA library from NTera2D1 cells (49). Out of a million phage recombinants screened, three positive plaques were obtained. The corresponding inserts were subcloned into pUC119 and sequenced on both strands.

Plasmid constructs

To generate constructs encoding full-length and truncated FBI-1 proteins for transcription/translation in vitro, the desired coding sequences were amplified by PCR and the resulting fragments were inserted into the plasmid pCITE2a(+), or derivatives thereof that place the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag (50) or the T7 epitope tag (51,52), respectively, at the N-terminus. For expression in vivo, the PCR fragments were inserted into the plasmids pCGN or pCGT for expression of HA- or T7-N-terminal tagged proteins, respectively. The resulting constructs were each sequenced to ensure that no point mutations were introduced during PCR. pCITE-FBI, pNCITE-FBI, pCITET7-FBI, pET11c-GST-FL-FBI-1, pCGNFBI and pCGTFBI contain full-length FBI-1 (amino acids 1-584); pCITE-ZF, pNCITE-ZF, pET11c-GST-ZF, pCGTZF and pCGNZF contain FBI-1 amino acids 377-584; pCITE-[Delta]POZ and pCGN[Delta]POZ, amino acids 122-584; pET11c-GST-[Delta]N, amino acids 235-584; pCITE-[Delta]ZF, pET11c-GST-[Delta]ZF, amino acids 1-382; pCGN[Delta]ZF/C, amino acids 1-382 and 485-584; and pNCITE-POZ, pCGNPOZ and pCGTPOZ, amino acids 1-122; the pET derivatives pSB-GST-ZFKO1, pSB-GST-ZFKO2, pSB-GST-ZFKO3, pSB-GST-ZFKO4 contain FBI-1 amino acids 377-584 with mutations C384A + C387A, C412A + C415A, C440A + C443A and C468A + C471A, respectively.

Generation of anti-peptide antibodies

Two synthetic peptides corresponding to amino acids 147-166 (CSH 509) and amino acids 354-377 (CSH 510) of the predicted FBI-1 amino acid sequence were coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyamin (Pierce) as described (53) and injected into rabbits to generate two sets of polyclonal antibodies: CS412 and CS413, directed against the CSH 509 peptide, and CS414 and CS415, directed against the CSH 510 peptide. Antibodies were tested in immunoblots and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs).

In vitro immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting

HAFBI and T7FBI were expressed singly or in combination in the TNT coupled reticulocyte lysate system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). The monoclonal antibody 12CA5, directed against the HA epitope (50), was chemically crosslinked to protein A-agarose beads as described (53). Twenty microliters of lysate were incubated with 10 µl of 12CA5 beads for 30 min at room temperature. The beads were recovered by centrifugation and washed four times in cold HEMGT/KCl [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.1 mM EDTA, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 150 mM KCl , 0.1% Tween-20, 3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsufonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium bisulfite, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A]. Bound proteins were released by boiling the beads in 5× Laemmli buffer (47) and fractionated on two identical 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose and visualized by immunoblotting with either 12CA5 or anti-T7 antibodies by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham). A similar technique was used for co-immunoprecipitation of [35S]methionine-labeled proteins, namely HAPOZ with FBI-1 or [Delta]POZ and HAZF with FBI-1 or [Delta]ZF, except that the proteins were fractionated on a 17% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and the gel was then processed for autoradiography.

In vivo immunoprecipitations

Three micrograms of pCGN or pCGT plasmids, either empty or expressing FBI-1 as indicated, were transfected into HeLa cells by electroporation as described (13). Thirty-six hours post transfection the cells (50% confluent) were washed twice with PBS and then scraped into extraction buffer [200 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 75 µg/ml ethidium bromide and 1 tablet/10 ml of Complete Mini EDTA-free Protease inhibitor cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim)]. After 45 min on ice the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 14 000 g for 10 min and transferred to a new tube. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were carried out as described above with 300 µl of extract and 20 µl of beads crosslinked to the 12CA5 monoclonal antibody (50), except that the beads were washed with extraction buffer lacking glycerol.

Expression of GST fusion proteins

The plasmids pET11c-GST-FL-FBI-1, pET11c-GST-ZF, pET11c-GST-[Delta]N, pET11c-GST-[Delta]ZF, pSB-GST-ZFKO1, pSB-GST-ZFKO2, pSB-GST-ZFKO3, pSB-GST-ZFKO4 were transformed into the Escherichia coli BL21 strain (54). One colony was inoculated into 5 ml of M9ZB (54) medium containing 100 µg/ml of ampicillin, and the cultures were grown at 37°C for 3 h. The 5 ml culture was then transferred into 250 ml of M9ZB medium containing 100 µg/ml of ampicillin, and the culture was grown at 37°C until the OD600 reached 0.8. IPTG was then added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM and the culture was further incubated with shaking at room temperature for 3 h. The cells were collected by centrifugation and the pellet was resuspended in 25 ml of suspension buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 100 mM KCl, 20% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 3 mM DTT, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 µM pepstatin, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium bisulfite, 2 µg/ml aprotinin]. Lysozyme was then added to a final concentration of 100 µg/ml and the mixture was incubated on ice for 20 min, at which point NP-40 was added to a final concentration of 0.1%. The samples were sonicated and then cleared by centrifugation at 15 000 r.p.m. for 15 min at 4°C in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. The supernatants were then mixed with 350 µl of a 1:1 slurry of glutathione agarose beads for 10-14 h at 4°C. The beads were washed four times with HEMGN buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 150 mM KCl, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM DTT, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.5 µM pepstatin, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium bisulfite, 2 µg/ml aprotinin]. The GST fusion proteins were eluted in 200 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 8.8), 10 mM reduced glutathione for 1-2 h at 4°C. The beads were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 r.p.m. for 1 min in a microcentrifuge and 20 µl of 1 M KCl, 50% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM PMSF, 20 mM DTT, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µM pepstatin, 5 mM benzamidine, 20 µg/ml aprotinin were added to the supernatants.

EMSA

EMSAs were performed with end-labeled DNA probes generated by PCR as previously described (19), except in Figure 4C and D, where the gels contained 6.5% polyacrylamide (29:1 acrylamide:bis-acrylamide) rather than 5%. Where specified, 0.5 µl of fetal calf serum (FCS), preimmune serum or anti-FBI antibodies (CS414) were added to the gel shift reactions prior to addition of the probe. In some cases, 2 µg of peptide were also added to reaction.

RESULTS

FBI-1 is a POZ domain protein

To obtain cDNAs encoding FBI-1, we purified FBI-1 essentially as previously described (19) except for the addition of two protein concentration steps. To follow the presence of FBI-1 through the purification, we monitored IST binding activity by EMSA. First, HeLa cell nuclear extract was fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitations. The protein fraction precipitated between 22.5 and 47.5% ammonium sulfate, which contained FBI-1, was further purified over three ion-exchange columns: SP-Sepharose, heparin agarose and hydroxyapatite. The hydroxyapatite fractions containing the peak of IST binding activity were then pooled and used in a large scale immunoprecipitation with anti-TBP antibodies (SL39a) chemically crosslinked to protein G-agarose beads. This step, which is the most efficient in the FBI-1 purification protocol, relies on the observation that the anti-TBP antibody SL39a crossreacts with native FBI-1 in the absence of TBP (19). Antibody-bound proteins were eluted with a peptide corresponding to the antigen recognized by SL39a (46), and concentrated by chromatography over a mini SP-Sepharose column followed by trichloroacetic acid precipitation. The precipitated proteins were then resuspended in Laemmli buffer and fractionated in a single lane on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. A polypeptide migrating with an apparent molecular mass of 86 kDa, and thus presumably corresponding to the previously identified p86 (19), was excised from the gel and subjected to microsequencing as described previously (48). We obtained six peptide sequences, which were used to search the expressed sequence tagged (EST) database. This led to the identification of a 355 bp EST that could encode two complete peptides and part of a third one. A probe was then designed based upon this sequence and used to screen a [lambda]gt10 human embryonic carcinoma cDNA library (49). The inserts of three positive plaques were subcloned and sequenced, and all three contained identical open reading frames of 1.75 kb that could encode a 584 amino acid protein. As shown below, this protein corresponds to the IST-binding activity we purified and is, therefore, referred to as FBI-1.

Figure 1A shows the deduced amino acid sequence. All peptide sequences obtained from microsequencing (underlined) could be accounted for within the open reading frame. The sequence contains some interesting protein motifs, which are indicated schematically in Figure 1B. The C-terminal region of the protein contains four C2-H2 zinc fingers, which are of the Krüppel type as they have the conserved H-C link between fingers (55). The N-terminal 120 amino acids bear strong similarity to the POZ domain. Figure 1C shows an alignment of various POZ domains. The FBI POZ domain is 25-36% identical with those of other POZ domain proteins such as the Drosophila GAGA factor (34,56), Broad Complex (BR-C) (57) and Tramtrack (Ttk) protein (58,59), and the human PLZF (30) and BCL-6 (24,60,61) proteins and 10 amino acids are absolutely identical among all these proteins. FBI-1 also contains a bipartite nuclear localization signal (62) at the C-terminus (indicated in bold in Fig. 1A), and localization studies by immunofluorescence microscopy have confirmed that FBI-1 is indeed nuclear (data not shown). FBI-1 (GenBank accession no. AF097916) matches a partial cDNA sequence in the GenBank database called TTF-1 interacting peptide 21 (accession no. AF000561) except for a one nucleotide deletion and one nucleotide insertion. These differences change the reading frame such that FBI-1 differs from TTF-1 interacting peptide 21 through the N-terminal region and through the entire C-terminal region including the zinc fingers, which are not revealed by the TTF-1 interacting peptide 21 sequence. FBI-1 is also very similar to two recent entries in the database, the mouse leukemia/lymphoma related factor (LRF, accession no. AF086830) and the chicken LRF (cLRF, accession no. AF086831), and is probably the human homolog of these proteins. Northern blot analysis indicated that FBI-1 mRNA is expressed in peripheral blood leukocytes, colon, small intestine and ovary (data not shown). FBI-1 is also expressed at the protein level in all human cell lines tested (including HeLa, Jurkat, BJAB and Raji cells) as determined by western blot analysis (data not shown).

   A, B
   C

Figure 1. (A) Predicted amino acid sequence of FBI-1. The shaded amino acids at the N-terminus of the protein correspond to the POZ domain, those at the C-terminus to the four C2-H2 zinc fingers. The peptide sequences obtained from the purified protein are underlined. The sequences corresponding to the synthetic peptides used to raise polyclonal antibodies are indicated by solid bars (peptide CSH 509, amino acids 147-166; peptide CSH 510, amino acids 354-377). Amino acids that are part of the bipartite nuclear localization signal (62) are indicated in bold. (B) Schematic view of FBI indicating the relative locations of the POZ domain, the zinc fingers and the nuclear localization signal. Also marked are the locations of the peptides used to raise the polyclonal antibodies AB412 and AB413 (peptide CSH509), and AB414 and AB415 (peptide CSH 510). (C) Alignment of the FBI-1 POZ domain with other POZ domains. The sequence alignments were performed with the CLUSTALW program with the default parameter settings. Shaded areas indicate identical amino acids. Asterisks indicate at least four similarities or identities out of the six sequences. The following amino acids were considered similar: V, I, L and M; D and E; N and Q; R, K and H; S and T; W, F and Y. The GenBank accessions for the sequences are as follows: human proteins BCL6, Z21943 and U00115; PLZF, Z19002; Drosophila proteins GAGA, L22205; BR-C, X54663; Ttk, X17121.


FBI-1 is part of the IST complex

To determine whether the cloned cDNA indeed encodes a protein which is part of the IST binding complex, we raised polyclonal antibodies directed against two peptides corresponding to amino acids 147-166 (peptide 509) and 354-377 (peptide 510) in Figure 1A (thick bars), and tested the effect of these antibodies in an EMSA. As shown in Figure 2, a DNA-protein complex formed when a HeLa cell fraction enriched in FBI (hydroxyapatite fraction) was incubated with an HIV-1 probe containing a functional IST element (lane 1), but not when the same fraction was incubated with a probe containing a debilitated IST (lane 2). Addition of a preimmune antibody to the binding reaction had no effect (lane 3) but addition of an antibody directed against the 510 peptide (AB 414; Fig. 1B) retarded the migration of the complex (lane 4, complex indicated by an arrow). This effect was specific, because preincubation of the antibody with the specific peptide against which it was raised abolished the supershift (lane 6), while preincubation with an irrelevant peptide had no effect (lane 5). In addition, the antibody itself did not bind to the probe (lane 7). We obtained the same results with three other antibodies, one directed against the same peptide but derived from another animal (AB 415), and two (derived from two animals) directed against the 509 peptide. Together, these data strongly suggest that we have indeed cloned a component of the IST binding complex.


Figure 2. FBI-1 is part of the IST complex. FBI-1 antibodies were tested for their ability to supershift the IST complex. Hydroxyapatite fractions enriched for FBI-1 (19) were incubated with either an HIV-1 probe carrying a functional IST (ms5) or mutant probe (msABC), as indicated [see (11) for the sequences of the probes], in the presence of FCS (lanes 1 and 2), preimmune serum (PRE, lane 3) or immune serum (IM, lane 4-6: antibody 414). In lane 5, the immune serum was preincubated with non-specific peptide (NS), and in lane 6 with specific peptide (SP) before addition to the binding reaction. In lane 7, immune serum alone was incubated with the ms5 probe. The antibody-induced supershift of the FBI-1/DNA complex is indicated by an arrow.

Recombinant FBI-1 co-migrates with the endogenous protein

The FBI-1 open reading frame shown in Figure 1A ended with a stop codon, and started with a methionine surrounded by a good match to the Kozak consensus sequence for translation initiation (63). Nevertheless, the inserts did not contain any termination codons upstream of the putative initiating methionine, and the open reading frame encoded a 584 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of 61.5 kDa, a significant discrepancy with the apparent molecular weight on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (86 kDa) of FBI-1 purified from HeLa cells (19). We were, therefore, originally uncertain that we had cloned the complete open reading frame. To address this question, we compared the mobility of the recombinant protein with that of the endogenous protein on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and the results are shown in Figure 3.


Figure 3. Recombinant FBI-1 comigrates with the endogenous protein. (A) Hydroxyapatite fraction enriched for FBI-1 and in vitro translated radioactive FBI-1 were mixed and loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose and blotted with anti-FBI-1 antibodies (AB 414). Lane 1 contains 1 µl of hydroxyapatite fraction mixed with 2 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate expressing l-35S-labeled recombinant FBI-1. Lane 2 contains 1 µl of fraction mixed with 2 µl of unprogrammed lysate. Lane 3 contains 5 µl of fraction alone. (B) Autoradiograph of the same blot. After decay of the chemiluminescent signal, the membrane was exposed to film for 24 h to reveal the radioactive signals. (C) The autoradiographic image in (B) was superimposed on the western blot image in (A). The position of FBI-1 is indicated by an arrow.

   A, B
   C, D

Figure 4. FBI-1 binds to the IST element in a manner dependent on the integrity of the first and second zinc fingers. (A) Increasing amounts of unlabeled, in vitro translated FL FBI-1 (lanes 1-3), zinc finger domain (ZF, lanes 5-8) or increasing amounts of unprogrammed lysate (lanes 10-12) were incubated with an HIV-1 probe carrying a functional IST (ms5). The highest amounts of these proteins were also incubated with mutant IST probe (msABC, lanes 4, 9 and 13). The mobilities of the FL FBI-1/DNA and ZF/DNA complexes are indicated by arrows. (B) FL FBI-1 (lanes 1-4) and ZF (lanes 5-8) translated in vitro were incubated with the ms5 probe in the presence of FCS (lanes 1 and 5) or anti-FBI antibodies (414, lanes 2-4 and 6-8). In lanes 3 and 7, the antibodies had been preincubated with non-specific peptide (NS), and in lanes 4 and 8 with specific peptide (SP), before addition to the binding reaction. The upper arrow indicates the anti-FBI-1 antibody-induced supershift of the FL FBI-1/DNA complex, the middle arrow indicates the FL FBI-1/DNA complex, and the bottom arrow indicates the ZF/DNA complex. (C) Increasing amounts of GST fusion proteins expressed in E.coli were incubated with the ms5 or msABC probes as indicated above the lanes. The GST fusion proteins used are indicated above the lanes: GST-FL-FBI-1 corresponds to GST fused to full-length FBI-1, GST-[Delta]N to GST fused to amino acids 235-584 of FBI-1, GST-ZF to GST fused to amino acids 377-584 of FBI-1, and GST-[Delta]ZF to GST fused to amino acids 1-382 of FBI-1. In lanes 17 and 18, no proteins were added. The upper arrow indicated the GST-FL-FBI-1/DNA complex, the middle arrow indicates the GST-[Delta]N/DNA complex and the bottom arrow indicates the GST-ZF/DNA complex. (D) Increasing amounts of the E.coli expressed GST fusion proteins indicated above the lanes were incubated with the ms5 or msABC probes as indicated above the lanes. GST-ZF corresponds to GST fused to amino acids 377-584 of FBI-1. GST-ZFKO1, GST-ZFKO2, GST-ZFKO3 and GSTZFKO4 are similar to GST-ZF except that cysteines 384 + 387, 412 + 415, 440 + 443 and 468 + 471, respectively, were changed to alanines. In lanes 21 and 22, no proteins were added. The arrow indicates the GST-ZF/DNA or GST-ZFKO3/DNA or GST-ZFKO4/DNA complexes.

Radiolabeled recombinant FBI-1 was synthesized by translation in vitro in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate, mixed with a small amount of partially biochemically purified HeLa FBI-1 fraction (hydroxy-apatite step), and the proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE. As controls, we also included unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate mixed with the same small amount of HeLa FBI-1 fraction, and a large amount of the HeLa FBI-1 fraction alone. The proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose and subjected first to immunoblotting with an anti-FBI-1 peptide antibody (CS414) to visualize biochemically purified FBI-1, and second, after decay of the chemiluminescent signal, to autoradiography to visualize the radiolabeled recombinant protein translated in vitro. As shown in Figure 3A, the anti-FBI-1 antibodies detected a band migrating with an apparent molecular weight of 86 kDa in the lane loaded with a large amount of HeLa cell fraction, as expected (lane 3). A weaker signal was also apparent in the lanes containing small amounts of the HeLa cell fraction mixed with either programmed or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysates, as expected. Figure 3B shows an autoradiography of the same gel. In this case, a signal corresponding to in vitro translated recombinant FBI-1 is visible in the lane containing programmed (lane 1), but not in that containing unprogrammed (lane 2), reticulocyte lysate. Significantly, radiolabeled recombinant FBI-1 migrates with an apparent molecular weight of 86 kDa. Indeed, when the two panels are superimposed, it is apparent that recombinant FBI-1 comigrates with the native protein (Fig. 3C). Together, these data suggest that the cDNAs we have cloned encode a full-length FBI-1 open reading frame.

FBI-1 binds to the IST element, and the first and second zinc fingers are absolutely required for binding

Recombinant FBI-1 is part of the IST complex (Fig. 2) and contains zinc fingers, suggesting that it might be able to bind to the IST directly. To test this possibility, we examined the binding abilities of various FBI-1 derivatives. (Note that the structures of all the FBI-1 derivatives used here and elsewhere in this work are illustrated in Figure 6A.) We first tested proteins expressed by in vitro translation. As shown in Figure 4A, a specific complex (indicated by an arrow) was formed when an HIV-1 probe carrying a functional IST (ms5, lanes 1-3), but not when an HIV-1 probe carrying a debilitated IST (msABC, lane 4), was incubated with the full-length FBI-1 protein (FL-FBI-1). This complex, which migrates similarly to the hydroxyapatite complex (data not shown), was not observed when unprogrammed lysate was incubated with the probes [lanes 10-13: note that a smaller complex, which appears specific, is visible in these lanes; its origin is not known, but it may result from binding of a rabbit homolog of a protein such as LBP-1, which is known to bind to the IST region of HIV-1 but whose binding does not correlate with IST activity (19)]. Furthermore, the complex was supershifted by addition of anti-FBI-1 antibodies or anti-FBI-1 antibodies preincubated with an irrelevant peptide (Fig. 4B, compare lanes 2 and 3 with lane 1), but not FBI-1 antibodies preincubated with the specific peptide against which they were raised (Fig. 4B, lane 4). These results show that recombinant FBI-1 is able to bind specifically to the IST.

To determine whether specific binding to the IST was mediated by the zinc finger domain (ZF), we expressed by in vitro translation an FBI-1 truncation encompassing amino acids 377-584 and thus containing the zinc finger domain. As with full-length FBI-1, a specific complex, not observed with unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (Fig. 4A, lanes 10-13), was obtained upon incubation of this truncated protein with the HIV-1 probe carrying a functional IST (lanes 5-8), but not the HIV-1 probe carrying a debilitated IST (lane 9). This complex migrated much faster than the complex containing full-length FBI-1, as expected. In addition, the complex was not supershifted with the anti-FBI-1 peptide antibodies, which are directed against FBI-1 sequences not present in the truncated protein (Fig. 4B, lanes 5-8). To confirm and extend these results, we also expressed derivatives of FBI-1 as GST fusion proteins in E.coli. As shown in Figure 4C, GST fusion proteins containing full-length FBI-1 (GST-FL-FBI-1; lanes 1-4), the last 350 amino acids of FBI-1 including the zinc domain (GST-[Delta]N, amino acids 235-584; lanes 5-8), or just the zinc domain (GST-ZF, amino acids 377-584; lanes 9-12), all bound to the probe carrying a functional IST (ms5) but not to probes carrying a debilitated IST (msABC). In contrast, the GST fusion protein lacking the zinc domain (GST-[Delta]ZF, amino acids 1-382; lanes 13-16) was incapable of forming a detectable complex with either wild-type or mutant probes. These results show that the zinc domain is sufficient for specific binding to the IST.

The FBI-1 zinc domain contains four C2-H2 zinc fingers. We debilitated each zinc finger individually by mutation of the two cysteines to alanines within the context of the GST-ZF derivative of FBI-1 (Fig. 6A). These proteins were then tested for their abilities to bind to the IST. As shown in Figure 4D, GST-ZFKO1 and GST-ZFKO2, which carried mutations in the first and second zinc finger, respectively, were unable to bind to the IST (lanes 5-11). In sharp contrast, GST-ZFKO3 and GST-ZFKO4, which carried mutations in the third and fourth zinc finger, respectively, could still bind efficiently and specifically to the IST (lanes 13-20), albeit binding was less efficient than that of the wild-type GST-ZF protein (compare lanes 1, 13 and 17, where the lowest amounts of proteins were tested and the probe is in excess). Thus, the first and second zinc fingers are essential for efficient binding to the IST, while the third and fourth zinc fingers contribute comparatively little to binding efficiency.

FBI-1 self-associates in solution

A number of POZ proteins are capable of associating with themselves and certain other POZ proteins. To determine whether the same is true for FBI-1, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays, both in vitro and in vivo. For the in vitro assay, HA-tagged FBI-1 (HAFL) and T7-tagged FBI-1 (T7FL) were translated in vitro either singly or in combination, and the resulting proteins were used as the starting material for non-denaturing immunoprecipitations with anti-HA antibodies (monoclonal antibody 12CA5; 50). The starting material and the immunoprecipitated proteins were then fractionated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted either with an anti-HA or with an anti-T7 antibody. The anti-HA immunoblot showed that the HAFL protein was efficiently expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown). In addition, as shown in Figure 5A, the anti-T7 immunoblot showed that T7FL was expressed equally well alone or in combination with HAFL (lanes 2-3). T7FL alone was not immunoprecipitated by the anti-HA antibody, as expected (lane 5). However, when the mixture of T7FL and HAFL was used for immunoprecipitation with the anti-HA antibody, T7FL was detected in the immunoprecipitate (lane 6), suggesting that it associates with HAFL in vitro.


Figure 5. FBI-1 self-associates in solution. (A) Co-immunoprecipitations of proteins translated in vitro. In vitro translated HAFBI-1 (HAFL), T7FBI-1 (T7FL), or a combination of the two as indicated above the lanes, were incubated with protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to the anti-HA monoclonal antibody 12CA5. Immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose and blotted with anti-T7 antibodies. Lanes 1-3 show 1/10 of the input material, lanes 4-6 show the corresponding immunoprecipitations. The position of T7FL is indicated. An anti-HA blot was also performed (data not shown) and confirmed that the HA-tagged proteins were expressed and immunoprecipitated. (B) Co-immunoprecipitations of proteins expressed in HeLa cells. Vectors expressing HAFBI-1 (HAFL), HAOct1 and T7FBI-1 (T7FL) were transfected alone or in combination into Hela cells, as indicated above the lanes. Thirty-six hours post-transfection, extracts from transfected cells were prepared and incubated with protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to anti-HA 12CA5 monoclonal antibodies. The immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with anti-T7 antibodies. Lanes 1-3 show 1/10 of the input material, lanes 4-8 show the corresponding immunoprecipitations. The position of the T7FL is shown by an arrow. An anti-HA immunoblot of a separate gel demonstrated that HAFL and HAOct1 were expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown).


Figure 6. (A) FBI-1 deletion constructs. FL FBI-1 corresponds to FBI-1 amino acids 1-584; POZ, amino acids 1-122; [Delta]POZ, amino acids 122-584; [Delta]N, amino acids 235-684; ZF, amino acids 377-584; ZFKO1, amino acids 377-584 with the mutations C384A + C387A; ZFKO2, amino acids 377-584 with the mutations C412A + C415A; ZFKO3, amino acids 377-584 with the mutations C440A + C443A; ZFKO4, amino acids 377-584 with the mutations C468A + C471A; [Delta]ZF, amino acids 1-382; and [Delta]ZF/C, amino acids 1-382 and 485-584. (B) Summary of the in vitro and in vivo co-immunoprecipitation results. +, interaction; -, no interaction and ND, not done.

To detect association in vivo, HeLa cells were transfected either with a T7FL expression construct alone, or with a combination of HAFL and T7FL expression constructs. As a control, cells were also transfected with a combination of a T7FL expression construct and a construct expressing HA-tagged Oct-1 (HAOct1), a protein which is not known to interact with POZ domain proteins. The cells were then lysed and the resulting protein extracts used for immunoprecipitations. As above, starting material and immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with the anti-HA and anti-T7 antibodies. The anti-HA immunoblot showed that the HA-tagged proteins were all expressed in the transfected cells and were immunoprecipitated (data not shown). As shown in Figure 5B, the anti-T7 immunoblot showed that equal amounts of T7FL were expressed in all three transfections (lanes 1-3). As expected, T7FL alone was not immunoprecipitated by the anti-HA antibody (lane 6), nor was it co-immunoprecipitated with HAOct1 (lane 8). In sharp contrast, however, T7FL was co-immunoprecipitated with HAFL (lane 7). Because the immunoprecipitations were performed in the presence of ethidium bromide, which disrupts many protein-DNA associations (64), it seems unlikely that the observed association results from contaminating DNA bridging two molecules of FBI-1. Together, these results strongly suggest that full-length FBI-1 can self-associate, both in vitro and in vivo.

We also tested whether FBI-1 can associate in vitro with other POZ domain proteins such as Drosophila Ttk and GAGA factor, as well as human PLZF. However, unlike FBI-1 itself, none of these proteins was able to co-immunoprecipitate with FBI-1 (data not shown). Thus, the FBI-1 self-association is specific and does not reflect a general ability of the protein to associate with other POZ domain proteins.

The FBI-1 POZ domain self-associates both in vitro and in vivo

To determine which region of FBI-1 is required for self-association, we tested several of the constructs shown in Figure 6A. POZ consists of just the POZ domain of FBI (amino acids 1-123), [Delta]POZ contains all of FBI-1 but the POZ domain (amino acids 122-584), ZF encompasses the four zinc fingers and remaining C-terminal sequences (amino acids 377-584), and [Delta]ZF contains all of FBI-1 but the four zinc fingers and C-terminal sequences (amino acids 1-382). The [Delta]ZF/C construct was used for in vivo expression and lacks the four zinc fingers but includes the C-terminal sequences containing the nuclear localization signal (amino acids 1-382 and 485-584). These various truncations were tested for self-association in vitro and in vivo as above, and the results are shown in Figure 7 and summarized in Figure 6B.

   A, B
   C, D

Figure 7. Identification of self-association domains in FBI-1. (A) The FBI-1 POZ domain self-associates in vitro. HAPOZ, FL FBI-1 and [Delta]POZ were expressed alone or in combination as indicated above the lanes in the presence of l-[35S]methionine and incubated with protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to anti-HA monoclonal antibodies. The beads were washed, boiled in loading buffer, and the bound proteins were fractionated on a 17% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Lanes 1-5 show 1/8 of the starting material and lanes 6-10 show the immunoprecipitated proteins. The positions of FL FBI-1 (FL), [Delta]POZ and HAPOZ are indicated. (B) The FBI-1 POZ domain self-associates in vivo. Constructs expressing HAFL, HAPOZ, HA[Delta]POZ, T7FL and T7POZ were transfected alone or in combination as indicated above the lanes into HeLa cells. Thirty-six hours post-transfection, extracts from transfected cells were prepared and incubated with protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to anti-HA 12CA5 monoclonal antibodies. The immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and blotted with anti-T7 antibodies. Lanes 1-7 show 1/10 of the starting material, lanes 8-14 show the immunoprecipitations. Lanes 1 and 8 correspond to a mock-transfected cell control. The positions of T7FL and T7POZ are indicated. Two prominent crossreacting bands seen in every immunoprecipitation lane are labeled with a dot. An anti-HA immunblot of a separate gel demonstrated that the HA-tagged proteins were expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown). (C) The FBI-1 C-terminal domain does not self-associate in vitro. The experiment was performed as in (A), except that the constructs indicated above the lanes were used. The positions of FL FBI-1 (FL), [Delta]ZF and HAZF are indicated. (D) The FBI-1 C-terminal domain self-associates in vivo. The experiment was performed as in (B), except that the constructs indicated above the lanes were used and that the gel was a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The positions of T7FL and T7ZF are indicated, and a crossreacting band seen in every immunoprecipitation lane is labeled with a dot. An anti-HA immunblot of a separate gel demonstrated that the HA-tagged proteins were expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown).

We first determined the ability of the POZ domain to interact with full-length FBI-1 (FL), and the full-length protein lacking just the POZ domain ([Delta]POZ) in vitro. We co-translated HA-tagged POZ with untagged FL or untagged [Delta]POZ in the presence of l-[35S]-methionine. As shown in Figure 7A, the various protein truncations were expressed at different levels, but all were clearly visible on the gel (lanes 1-5). HA-tagged POZ was immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody, as expected (lanes 6, 9 and 10). FL and [Delta]POZ exhibited low level background binding to the anti-HA antibody beads (lanes 7 and 8) but in the presence of HAPOZ, much higher levels of FL were observed in the immunoprecipitate (compare lane 9 with lane 7). In contrast, [Delta]POZ was not co-immunoprecipitated with HAPOZ (lane 10). Together, these results suggest that the FBI-1 self-associates in vitro through POZ domain-POZ domain interactions.

Similar results were obtained in vivo, and are shown in Figure 7B. T7-tagged POZ was expressed alone or in com-bination with HA-tagged POZ or HA-tagged [Delta]POZ in HeLa cells, cell extracts were used for immunoprecipitations with anti-HA antibodies, and the T7-tagged proteins were detected by immunoblotting with an anti-T7 antibody. T7POZ was expressed well in all transfections (lanes 5-7). T7POZ alone or combined with HA[Delta]POZ was not co-immunoprecipitated by the anti-HA antibody (lanes 12 and 14). In contrast, T7POZ was co-immunoprecipitated when combined with HAPOZ (lane 13). Thus, as in vitro, the FBI-1 POZ domain specifically interacts with itself in vivo (Fig. 6B).

The FBI-1 C-terminal end containing the zinc finger domain self-associates in vivo but not in vitro

We then asked whether the C-terminal end of the protein including the zinc finger domain might also be involved in self-association of FBI-1 in vitro. As shown in Figure 7C, HA-tagged ZF was co-expressed with FL or [Delta]ZF in vitro in the presence of l-[35S]methionine (lanes 1-5). HAZF was immunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibodies, as expected (lanes 6, 9 and 10). FL and [Delta]ZF exhibited a low level of background binding to the anti-HA antibody beads (lanes 7 and 8) and in the presence of HAZF, these levels were decreased (lanes 9 and 10). Thus, we could not detect self-association of the C-terminal end of FBI-1 in vitro. In contrast, however, such association could be detected in vivo, as shown in Figure 7D. T7-tagged ZF was expressed alone or together with HA-tagged ZF or [Delta]ZF/C in HeLa cells, protein extracts were used for immunoprecipitations with anti-HA antibodies, and the T7-tagged proteins were detected as before by immunoblotting with an anti-T7 tag antibody. T7ZF was able to be co-immunoprecipitated by HAZF (lane 13) but not by HA[Delta]ZF/C (lane 14), suggesting that in vivo, the zinc domain can interact with itself. As with all the immunoprecipitations from transfected HeLa cell lysates described above, ethidium bromide was present both during the immunoprecipitation and the washes, suggesting that the observed interaction is not mediated by contaminating DNA. Thus, the FBI-1 zinc domain appears to interact with itself in vivo, but not in vitro.

FBI-1 associates with Tat in vivo

Upon Tat transactivation, synthesis of the short transcripts is repressed. We therefore asked whether Tat might associate with FBI-1 in vivo. T7-tagged full-length FBI-1 (T7FL) was expressed alone or together with HA-tagged Tat in HeLa cells. The resulting lysates were then used for immunoprecipitations with anti-HA antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were checked for the presence of T7FL by anti-T7 immunoblots. As shown in Figure 8A, T7FL was expressed (lane 1) but was not immunoprecipitated by the anti-HA antibody (lane 2). However, T7FL was detected in the anti-HA immunoprecipitate when HATat was present, suggesting that the two proteins associate (lane 4). We then performed an immunoprecipitation with anti-T7 antibodies and checked for the presence of HATat in the immunoprecipitates by anti-HA immunoblot. HATat was expressed (lanes 6 and 8) but was not immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 antibodies, as expected (lane 10). However, HATat was detected in the immunoprecipitate when T7FL was present (lane 12), again indicating that the two proteins associate. As above, ethidium bromide was present during the immunoprecipitations and the washes, suggesting that the interaction is not mediated by contaminating DNA.


Figure 8. FBI-1 and Tat associate in vivo. (A) Constructs expressing T7FL and HATat were transfected alone or in combination as indicated above the lanes into HeLa cells. Thirty-six hours post-transfection, extracts from transfected cells were prepared and incubated with protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to anti-HA 12CA5 monoclonal antibodies (lanes 2-4), or protein A-agarose beads crosslinked to anti-T7 antibodies (lanes 9-12). The immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose and blotted with anti-T7 antibodies (lanes 1-4), or anti-HA antibodies (lanes 5-12). Lanes 1 and 5-8 show 1/12 of the starting material, lanes 2-4 and 9-12 show the immunoprecipitations. The position of T7FL and HATat are indicated. Weak cross-reacting bands are labeled with a dot. For lanes 1-4, an anti-HA immunoblot of a separate gel demonstrated that the HA-tagged proteins were expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown). For lanes 5-12, an anti-T7 immunoblot of a separate gel demonstrated that the T7-tagged proteins were expressed and immunoprecipitated (data not shown). (B) Constructs expressing T7FL and HATat, HATat18Is or HATatC30,31A were transfected alone or in combination as indicated above the lanes into HeLa cells. The experiment was performed as in (A) with the immunoprecipitation performed with anti-HA antibodies and the immunoblot performed with anti-T7 antibodies. Lane 1 shows 1/10 of the starting material, lanes 2-6 show the immunoprecipitations. The position of T7FL is indicated. Weak cross-reacting bands are indicated by dots.

As a first step to determine the specificity of this interaction, we tested two Tat derivatives which contain mutations within the activation domain. Tat18Is contains a two amino acid insertion at position 18 and its ability to activate transcription from the HIV-1 LTR is reduced by 60-80% (65 and data not shown). TatC30,31A contains mutations that convert the cysteines at positions 30 and 31 to alanines, and it is unable to activate transcription from the HIV-1 LTR in a transfection assay (data not shown). As shown in Figure 8B, the ability of HATat18Is to interact with T7FL was reduced as compared with that of wild-type Tat (compare lanes 5 and 4), and TatC30,31A did not interact detectably with T7FL (lane 6). Yet, an immunoblot analysis with the anti-HA antibody showed that wild-type and mutant Tat proteins were expressed at similar levels (data not shown). The observation that point mutations in Tat can diminish or prevent interaction with FBI-1 suggest that the interaction is specific and does not reflect a general stickiness of the proteins involved.

DISCUSSION

FBI-1 is a POZ domain protein

We report here the isolation of a cDNA encoding FBI-1, a protein that binds to the HIV-1 IST. FBI-1 contains a zinc finger domain, and we have shown that this domain is sufficient for specific DNA binding. In addition, the protein contains a POZ domain, a domain implicated in protein-protein interactions (20). Indeed, FBI-1 self-associates specifically, both in vivo and in vitro, through the POZ domain. Other POZ proteins have been shown to form both homomeric and heteromeric complexes. For example, the POZ domains of human ZID (zinc finger protein with interaction domain) and Drosophila Ttk interact with themselves but not with each other nor with the POZ domain of ZF5. However, the POZ domain of the GAGA factor interacts with the POZ domain of Ttk (20). We have tested whether FBI-1 interacts with Ttk, the GAGA factor and PLZF, in the in vitro co-immunoprecipitation assay, with negative results (data not shown). This assay is quite stringent, however, and does not exclude the possibility of weak interactions between these factors.

FBI-1 can also self-associate in vivo, but not in vitro, through the zinc finger domain. It is not clear why self-association through the zinc finger domain is observed only in vivo, but an interesting possibility is that the complex formed in vivo contains one or several additional proteins that bridge two (or more) FBI-1 zinc finger domains. Many zinc finger domains have been shown to mediate both protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. For example, Ikaros, a protein involved in lymphoid cell development, contains a variable number of Krüppel-type zinc fingers depending on the specific splicing isoform of the protein. In all isoforms, however, the two C-terminal zinc fingers mediate Ikaros homodimerization (66; reviewed in 67). By analogy, the third and fourth zinc fingers of FBI-1, which are much less important for IST binding than the first and second zinc fingers, may play a role in self-association.

We have not determined how many FBI-1 molecules are present in a complex, but the structure of the FBI-1 binding site in HIV-1 suggests that it might be a dimer (or a multiple thereof). Indeed, in the HIV-1 promoter, FBI-1 recognizes two imperfect, inverted repeats, each of which resides in one of the IST half-elements. Each repeat can bind FBI-1 on its own, and mutation analysis indicates that each repeat is recognized with the same sequence specificity by FBI-1, suggesting that each half-site is recognized by the same DNA binding domain (F.Pessler and N.Hernandez, unpublished results). These observations are consistent with the idea that each half-site is recognized by the zinc finger domain of one molecule of FBI-1.

What is the role of FBI-1?

Because the binding of FBI-1 to wild-type and mutant ISTs correlates well with the abilities of the various ISTs to direct the synthesis of short transcripts, FBI-1 is a candidate for a protein involved in the formation of the HIV-1 short transcripts (19). However, in cotransfection experiments, we were unable to demonstrate a dramatic effect on the synthesis of short transcripts; over-expression of FBI-1 resulted in a 2-fold increase in the synthesis of both HIV-1 short and long transcripts (data not shown). This may be because of the presence of saturating amounts of endogenous FBI-1 in the cells. In addition, we were unable to demonstrate an effect of FBI-1 on synthesis of short transcripts in vitro, perhaps because we could not deplete FBI-1 to undetectable levels (data not shown). Nevertheless, the observation that FBI-1 interacts with Tat in vivo suggests that FBI-1 plays a role in the transcription of HIV-1. Upon Tat trans-activation, synthesis of the short transcripts is repressed. However, if Tat is targeted to HIV-1 promoter sequences upstream of the transcription start site, it activates the synthesis of both full-length and short transcripts (13). Thus, unlike activation of the long transcripts, repression of the short transcripts is dependent on Tat being targeted to the RNA, just downstream of the start site of transcription. Since the binding site for FBI-1 is also located downstream of the transcription start site, the two proteins may be in close proximity. It is conceivable, therefore, that repression of the short transcripts occurs through protein-protein contacts between Tat and FBI-1. Alternatively, FBI-1 may play a role in Tat trans-activation.

Several POZ domain proteins, including Drosophila Ttk (68-70), human BCL-6, PLZF and mouse ZF5, are involved in transcription repression. BCL-6 represses transcription either as a GAL4 fusion protein from promoters with GAL4 DNA binding sites (71,72), or from BCL-6 target sites cloned upstream of various promoters, in a manner dependent on the POZ domain and on a second, non-contiguous region located between the POZ domain and the zinc finger domain (73). Similarly, PLZF functions as a repressor when fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain in a manner dependent on the POZ domain and a second region of the protein (37,74). And ZF5 represses the c-myc promoter, the HSV-1 thymidine kinase promoter and the [beta]-actin promoter (75,76). Both BCL-6 and PLZF associate with the corepressor SMRT, and PLZF has been shown to associate also with the Mad co-repressor mSin3A and the histone deacetylase HDAC1 (37,38,40,77). These associations depend in part on the POZ domain. These observations suggest that the POZ domain represses transcription at least in part by recruiting a histone deacetylase through the SMRT-mSin3-HDAC complex (37,38,40).

Interestingly, both BCL-6 and ZF5 have also been reported to modulate transcription from the HIV-1 promoter, the first as a repressor, and the second as an activator. BCL-6 can bind to sequences overlapping the NF-[kappa]B sites in the HIV-1 promoter in vitro, and can repress, presumably through these sites, HIV-1 transcription in vivo (78). In contrast, ZF5 activates the HIV-1 promoter through the Sp1 binding sites, and the effect is dependent on the POZ domain (76). It will be of great interest to determine the effects of various combinations of the BCL-6, ZF5 and FBI-1 POZ domain proteins on HIV-1 transcription.

It is intriguing to note the role of the POZ domain GAGA factor in transcription from the Drosophila hsp70 gene. The hsp70 gene contains, in the absence of heat shock, an RNA polymerase II molecule paused between positions +17 and +37 after the transcription start site, i.e. after synthesis of a short RNA molecule (79,80). The mechanism for restraining elongation after the initial pulse is not known, but sequences upstream of the hsp70 TATA box, including GAGA sequences and heat shock response elements (HSEs), are sufficient to program a paused RNA polymerase on a heterologous promoter (41). The generation of the pause is severely affected by mutations in the GAGA sequences, but not by mutations in the HSE, suggesting that the GAGA factor participates in the establishment of a paused RNA polymerase (41). The GAGA factor may play an indirect role in restraining elongation of the polymerase through chromatin remodeling. Indeed, the GAGA factor can mediate anti-repression of transcription on chromatin templates (42,43), and is involved in remodeling the chromatin around both the hsp70 and the hsp26 promoters (44,45). Alternatively, the GAGA factor may play a direct role, perhaps by anchoring the RNA polymerase downstream of the promoter. An intriguing possibility is that both FBI-1 and the GAGA factors mediate restricted transcription elongation by similar mechanisms.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Frank Pessler, who originally developed the FBI-1 purification protocol, for reagents and helpful discussions during the entire course of this project. We also thank Beicong Ma and Yuling Sun for valuable technical assistance, Regina Whitaker for assistance with cell culture, Spencer Teplin for oligonucleotide synthesis, and Vivian Bardwell, Jonathan Licht and Riccardo Dalla-Favera for constructs. We thank Michael Greenberg for helpful comments on the manuscript, and James Duffy, Michael Ockler and Philip Renna for artwork and photography. P.S.P. is supported by a Leukemia Society of America Special Fellowship Award (GN 629100).

REFERENCES

1. Kao,S.Y., Calman,A.F., Luciw,P.A. and Peterlin,B.M. (1987) Nature, 330, 489-493. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Laspia,M.F., Rice,A.P. and Mathews,M.B. (1989) Cell, 59, 283-292. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Laspia,M.F., Rice,A.P. and Mathews,M.B. (1990) Genes Dev., 4, 2397-2408. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Marciniak,R.A., Calnan,B.J., Frankel,A.D. and Sharp,P.A. (1990) Cell, 63, 791-802. MEDLINE Abstract

5. Marciniak,R.A. and Sharp,P.A. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 4189-4196. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Laspia,M.F., Wendel,P. and Mathews,M.B. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 232, 732-746. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Jones,K.A. and Peterlin,B.M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 63, 717-743. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Selby,M.J., Bain,E.S., Luciw,P.A. and Peterlin,B.M. (1989) Genes Dev., 3, 547-558. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Ratnasabapathy,R., Sheldon,M., Johal,L. and Hernandez,N. (1990) Genes Dev., 4, 2061-2074. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Kessler,M. and Mathews,M.B. (1992) J. Virol., 66, 4488-4496. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Sheldon,M., Ratnasabapathy,R. and Hernandez,N. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 1251-1263. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Pessler,F. and Hernandez,N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem., 273, 5375-5384. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Pendergrast,P.S. and Hernandez,N. (1997) J. Virol., 71, 910-917. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Palangat,M., Meier,T.I., Keene,R.G. and Landick,R. (1998) Mol. Cell, 1, 1033-1042.

15. Graham,G.J. and Maio,J.J. (1990) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 5817-5821. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Lisziewicz,J., Rappaport,J. and Dhar,R. (1991) New Biol., 3, 82-89. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Sullenger,B.A., Gallardo,H.F., Ungers,G.E. and Gilboa,E. (1990) Cell, 63, 601-608. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Lis,J. and Wu,K. (1993) Cell, 74, 1-4. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Pessler,F., Pendergrast,P.S. and Hernandez,N. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 3786-3798. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Bardwell,V.J. and Treisman,R. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 1664-1677. MEDLINE Abstract

21. Godt,D., Couderc,J.L., Cramton,S.E. and Laski,F.A. (1993) Development, 119, 799-812. MEDLINE Abstract

22. Sugawara,M., Scholl,T., Ponath,P.D. and Strominger,J.L. (1994)Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 8438-8450. MEDLINE Abstract

23. Ye,B.H., Lista,F., Lo Coco,F., Knowles,D.M., Offit,K., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1993) Science, 262, 747-750. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Kerckaert,J.P., Deweindt,C., Tilly,H., Quief,S., Lecocq,G. and Bastard,C. (1993) Nature Genet., 5, 66-70. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Migliazza,A., Martinotti,S., Chen,W., Fusco,C., Ye,B.H., Knowles,D.M., Offit,K., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1995) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 12520-12524. MEDLINE Abstract

26. Lo Coco,F., Ye,B.H., Lista,F., Corradini,P., Offit,K., Knowles,D.M., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1994) Blood, 83, 1757-1759. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Otsuki,T., Yano,T., Clark,H.M., Bastard,C., Kerckaert,J.P., Jaffe,E.S. and Raffeld,M. (1995) Blood, 85, 2877-2884. MEDLINE Abstract

28. Ye,B.H., Chaganti,S., Chang,C.C., Niu,H., Corradini,P., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1995) EMBO J., 14, 6209-6217. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Bernardin,F., Collyn-d'Hooghe,M., Quief,S., Bastard,C., Leprince,D. and Kerckaert,J.P. (1997) Oncogene, 14, 849-855. MEDLINE Abstract

30. Chen,Z., Brand,N.J., Chen,A., Chen,S.J., Tong,J.H., Wang,Z.Y., Waxman,S. and Zelent,A. (1993) EMBO J., 12, 1161-1167. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Chen,Z., Guidez,F., Rousselot,P., Agadir,A., Chen,S.J., Wang,Z.Y., Degos,L., Zelent,A., Waxman,S. and Chomienne,C. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 1178-1182. MEDLINE Abstract

32. Biggin,M.D. and Tjian,R. (1988) Cell, 53, 699-711. MEDLINE Abstract

33. Soeller,W.C., Oh,C.E. and Kornberg,T.B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7961-7970. MEDLINE Abstract

34. Farkas,G., Gausz,J., Galloni,M., Reuter,G., Gyurkovics,H. and Karch,F. (1994) Nature, 371, 806-808. MEDLINE Abstract

35. Granok,H., Leibovitch,B.A., Shaffer,C.D. and Elgin,S.C. (1995) Curr. Biol., 5, 238-241. MEDLINE Abstract

36. Chen,J.D. and Evans,R.M. (1995) Nature, 377, 454-457. MEDLINE Abstract

37. Hong,S.-H., David,G., Wong,C.-W., Dejean,A. and Privalsky,M.L. (1997) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 9028-9033. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Dhordain,P., Albagli,O., Lin,R.J., Ansieau,S., Quief,S., Leutz,A., Kerckaert,J.-P., Evans,R.M. and Leprince,D. (1997) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 10762-10767. MEDLINE Abstract

39. Nagy,L., Kao,H.Y., Chakravarti,D., Lin,R.J., Hassig,C.A., Ayer,D.E., Schreiber,S.L. and Evans,R.M. (1997) Cell, 89, 373-380. MEDLINE Abstract

40. David,G., Alland,L., Hong,S.-H., Wong,C.-W., DePinho,R.A. and Dejean,A. (1998) Oncogene, 16, 2549-2556. MEDLINE Abstract

41. Lee,H., Kraus,W., Wolfner,M.F. and Lis,J.T. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 284-295. MEDLINE Abstract

42. Croston,G.E., Kerrigan,L.A., Lira,L.M., Marshak,D.R. and Kadonaga,J.T. (1991) Science, 251, 643-649. MEDLINE Abstract

43. Kerrigan,L.A., Croston,G.E., Lira,L.M. and Kadonaga,J.T. (1991)J. Biol. Chem., 266, 574-582. MEDLINE Abstract

44. Tsukiyama,T., Becker,P.B. and Wu,C. (1994) Nature, 367, 525-532. MEDLINE Abstract

45. Wall,G., Varga-Weisz,P.D., Sandaltzopoulos,R. and Becker,P.B. (1995) EMBO J., 14, 1727-1736. MEDLINE Abstract

46. Lobo Ruppert,S.M., McCulloch,V., Meyer,M., Bautista,C., Falkowski,M., Stunnenberg,H.G. and Hernandez,N. (1996) Hybridoma, 15, 55-68. MEDLINE Abstract

47. Laemmli,E.K. (1970) Nature, 227, 680-685. MEDLINE Abstract

48. Henry,R.W., Sadowski,C.L., Kobayashi,R. and Hernandez,N. (1995) Nature, 374, 653-657. MEDLINE Abstract

49. Skowronski,J., Fanning,T.G. and Singer,M.F. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol., 8, 1385-1397. MEDLINE Abstract

50. Niman,H.L., Houghten,R.A., Walker,L.E., Reisfeld,R.A., Wilson,I.A., Hogle,J.M. and Lerner,R.A. (1983) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 4949-4953. MEDLINE Abstract

51. Lutz-Freyermuth,C., Query,C.C. and Keene,J.D. (1990) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 6393-6397. MEDLINE Abstract

52. Tsai,D.E., Kenan,D.J. and Keene,J.D. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 8864-8868. MEDLINE Abstract

53. Harlow,E. and Lane,D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

54. Studier,F.W., Rosenberg,A.H., Dunn,J.J. and Dubendorff,J.W. (1990) Methods Enzymol., 185, 60-89. MEDLINE Abstract

55. Schuh,R., Aicher,W., Gaul,U., Cote,S., Preiss,A., Maier,D., Seifert,E., Nauber,U., Schroder,C., Kemler,R. and Jackle,H. (1986) Cell, 47, 1025-1032. MEDLINE Abstract

56. Soeller,W.C., Oh,C.E. and Kornberg,T.B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7961-7970. MEDLINE Abstract

57. DiBello,P.R., Withers,D.A., Bayer,C.A., Fristrom,J.W. and Guild,G.M. (1991) Genetics, 129, 385-397. MEDLINE Abstract

58. Harrison,S.D. and Travers,A.A. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 207-216. MEDLINE Abstract

59. Brown,J.L., Sonoda,S., Ueda,H., Scott,M.P. and Wu,C. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 665-674. MEDLINE Abstract

60. Baron,B.W., Nucifora,G., McCabe,N., Espinosa,R.D., Le Beau,M.M. and McKeithan,T.W. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 5262-5266. MEDLINE Abstract

61. Ye,B.H., Rao,P.H., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1993) Cancer Res., 53, 2732-2735. MEDLINE Abstract

62. Robbins,J., Dilworth,S.M., Laskey,R.A. and Dingwall,C. (1991) Cell, 64, 615-623. MEDLINE Abstract

63. Kozak,M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem., 266, 19867-19870. MEDLINE Abstract

64. Lai,J.-S. and Herr,W. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 6958-6962. MEDLINE Abstract

65. Rice,A.P. and Carlotti,F. (1990) J. Virol., 64, 6018-6026. MEDLINE Abstract

66. Sun,L., Liu,A. and Georgopoulos,K. (1996) EMBO J., 15, 5358-5369. MEDLINE Abstract

67. Mackay,J.P. and Crossley,M. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci., 23, 1-4. MEDLINE Abstract

68. Read,D., Levine,M. and Manley,J.L. (1992) Mech. Dev., 38, 183-195. MEDLINE Abstract

69. Brown,J.L. and Wu,C. (1993) Development, 117, 45-58. MEDLINE Abstract

70. Xiong,W.C. and Montell,C. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 1085-1096. MEDLINE Abstract

71. Seyfert,V.L., Allman,D., He,Y. and Staudt,L.M. (1996) Oncogene, 12, 2331-2342. MEDLINE Abstract

72. Albagli,O., Dhordain,P., Bernardin,F., Quief,S., Kerkaert,J.P. and Leprince,D. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 220, 911-915. MEDLINE Abstract

73. Chang,C.C., Ye,B.H., Chaganti,R.S. and Dalla-Favera,R. (1996) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 6947-6952. MEDLINE Abstract

74. Li,J.Y., English,M.A., Ball,H.J., Yeyati,P.L., Waxman,S. and Licht,J.D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem., 272, 22447-22455. MEDLINE Abstract

75. Numoto,M., Niwa,O., Kaplan,J., Wong,K.K., Merrell,K., Kamiya,K., Yanagihara,K. and Calame,K. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 3767-3775. MEDLINE Abstract

76. Kaplan,J. and Calame,K. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1108-1116. MEDLINE Abstract

77. Laherty,C.D., Yang,W.M., Sun,J.M., Davie,J.R., Seto,E. and Eisenman,R.N. (1997) Cell, 89, 349-356. MEDLINE Abstract

78. Baron,B.W., Desai,M., Baber,L.J., Paras,L., Zhang,Q., Sadhu,A., Duguay,S., Nucifora,G., McKeithan,T.W. and Zeleznik-Le,N. (1997) Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 19, 14-21. MEDLINE Abstract

79. Giardina,C., Perez-Riba,M. and Lis,J.T. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 2190-2200. MEDLINE Abstract

80. Rasmussen,E.B. and Lis,J.T. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 7923-7927. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA. Tel: +1 516 367 8421;Fax: +1 516 367 6801; Email: hernande@cshl.org
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 11 Feb 1999
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1999.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B.-N. Jeon, J.-Y. Yoo, W.-I. Choi, C.-E. Lee, H.-G. Yoon, and M.-W. Hur
Proto-oncogene FBI-1 (Pokemon/ZBTB7A) Represses Transcription of the Tumor Suppressor Rb Gene via Binding Competition with Sp1 and Recruitment of Co-repressors
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33199 - 33210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W.-I. Choi, B.-N. Jeon, H. Park, J.-Y. Yoo, Y.-S. Kim, D.-I. Koh, M.-H. Kim, Y.-R. Kim, C.-E. Lee, K.-S. Kim, et al.
Proto-oncogene FBI-1 (Pokemon) and SREBP-1 Synergistically Activate Transcription of Fatty-acid Synthase Gene (FASN)
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2008; 283(43): 29341 - 29354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Gendron, J. Charbonneau, D. Dulude, N. Heveker, G. Ferbeyre, and L. Brakier-Gingras
The presence of the TAR RNA structure alters the programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift efficiency of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by modifying the rate of translation initiation
Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 30 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D.-K. Lee, J.-E. Kang, H.-J. Park, M.-H. Kim, T.-H. Yim, J.-M. Kim, M.-K. Heo, K.-Y. Kim, H. J. Kwon, and M.-W. Hur
FBI-1 Enhances Transcription of the Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B)-responsive E-selectin Gene by Nuclear Localization of the p65 Subunit of NF-{kappa}B
J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27783 - 27791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-S. Kim, J.-M. Kim, D.-L. Jung, J.-E. Kang, S. Lee, J. S. Kim, W. Seol, H.-C. Shin, H. S. Kwon, C. Van Lint, et al.
Artificial Zinc Finger Fusions Targeting Sp1-binding Sites and the trans-Activator-responsive Element Potently Repress Transcription and Replication of HIV-1
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21545 - 21552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-j. Liu, L. Prazak, M. Fajardo, S. Yu, N. Tyagi, and P. E. Di Cesare
Leukemia/Lymphoma-related Factor, a POZ Domain-containing Transcriptional Repressor, Interacts with Histone Deacetylase-1 and Inhibits Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Gene Expression and Chondrogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 47081 - 47091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Laudes, C. Christodoulides, C. Sewter, J. J. Rochford, R. V. Considine, J. K. Sethi, A. Vidal-Puig, and S. O'Rahilly
Role of the POZ Zinc Finger Transcription Factor FBI-1 in Human and Murine Adipogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11711 - 11718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Pessler and N. Hernandez
Flexible DNA Binding of the BTB/POZ-domain Protein FBI-1
J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 29327 - 29335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. L. Astier, R. Xu, M. Svoboda, E. Hinds, O. Munoz, R. de Beaumont, C. D. Crean, T. Gabig, and A. S. Freedman
Temporal gene expression profile of human precursor B leukemia cells induced by adhesion receptor: identification of pathways regulating B-cell survival
Blood, February 1, 2003; 101(3): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D.-K. Lee, D. Suh, H. J. Edenberg, and M.-W. Hur
POZ Domain Transcription Factor, FBI-1, Represses Transcription of ADH5/FDH by Interacting with the Zinc Finger and Interfering with DNA Binding Activity of Sp1
J. Biol. Chem., July 19, 2002; 277(30): 26761 - 26768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. S. Pendergrast, C. Wang, N. Hernandez, and S. Huang
FBI-1 Can Stimulate HIV-1 Tat Activity and Is Targeted to a Novel Subnuclear Domain that Includes the Tat-P-TEFb---containing Nuclear Speckles
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2002; 13(3): 915 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Read, M. J. Butte, A. F. Dernburg, M. Frasch, and T. B. Kornberg
Functional studies of the BTB domain in the Drosophila GAGA and Mod(mdg4) proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2000; 28(20): 3864 - 3870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Deltour, C. Guerardel, and D. Leprince
Recruitment of SMRT/N-CoR-mSin3A-HDAC-repressing complexes is not a general mechanism for BTB/POZ transcriptional repressors: The case of HIC-1 and gamma FBP-B
PNAS, December 21, 1999; 96(26): 14831 - 14836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. F. Marshall and M. E. Dahmus
C-terminal Domain Phosphatase Sensitivity of RNA Polymerase II in Early Elongation Complexes on the HIV-1 and Adenovirus 2 Major Late Templates
J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2000; 275(42): 32430 - 32437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (585K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?