Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 1 248-250
© 2003 Oxford University Press
BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database
Department of Biochemistry, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1X5, Canada
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 6472225781; Fax: +1 4165868869; Email: hogue{at}mshri.on.ca
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors
Received September 14, 2002; Revised and Accepted October 2, 2002
ABSTRACT
The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND: http://bind.ca) archives biomolecular interaction, complex and pathway information. A web-based system is available to query, view and submit records. BIND continues to grow with the addition of individual submissions as well as interaction data from the PDB and a number of large-scale interaction and complex mapping experiments using yeast two hybrid, mass spectrometry, genetic interactions and phage display. We have developed a new graphical analysis tool that provides users with a view of the domain composition of proteins in interaction and complex records to help relate functional domains to protein interactions. An interaction network clustering tool has also been developed to help focus on regions of interest. Continued input from users has helped further mature the BIND data specification, which now includes the ability to store detailed information about genetic interactions. The BIND data specification is available as ASN.1 and XML DTD.
INTRODUCTION
The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND) is designed to capture protein function, defined at the molecular level as the set of other molecules with which a protein interacts or reacts along with the molecular outcome. The inimitable growth of the known cell map continues unabated with new data on the structure of cell signaling and metabolic networks generated by constantly improving techniques such as mass spectrometry and two-hybrid screens (1). Interaction databases such as BIND (2,3) must keep pace so that such data is manageable. In cohort, visualization and analysis tools for this data must be made available to assist in understanding this complex data.
BIND
BIND stores information about interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Interactions occur between two biological ‘objects’, A and B, which could be protein, RNA, DNA, molecular complex, small molecule, photon (light) or gene. Molecular complexes and pathways are collections of these pairwise interactions, with some additional data. The minimum amount of information required to define an interaction is a description of A and B and a publication reference to PubMed. BIND is based on an extensive ASN.1 data specification [as previously published (4,5)] that can describe much of the detail underlying biochemical and genetic networks. XML versions of all data with accompanying DTDs are supported through the use of the NCBI programming toolkit (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/).
The BIND specification has remained stable since version 2.0 in 2001. Initially, BIND was designed only to support physical/biochemical interactions. Stemming from collaboration with a yeast genetic mapping project (6), our current 3.0 version has a wide range of support for genetic interactions (valid when A and B are genes), where both the genetic experiment and its result can be described in detail. This demonstrates the flexibility and extensibility of our data specification approach. Apart from cumulative minor changes, the current specification version has many general external references to enable integration with private database systems that may be similar to BIND. For instance, an external reference in the BIND-Interaction object can point to an in-house interaction database. Logical collections of records are now called divisions, similar to those in GenBank (see below). Up to date UML diagrams of the 3.0 BIND specification are present in the Supplementary Material.
BIND has progressed through multiple implementation cycles, each benefiting from collaborator and community constructive feedback. As part of our continuing effort to populate BIND, we have imported data from large-scale cell mapping studies, including ones we have been a part of (6–8). Recently, all molecular interactions in PDB (9) were imported into BIND, via the validated MMDB database (10), using MMDBBIND (11). Because of currently limited server space, these 64 956 records are not available for querying through the web interface, but are freely available on our FTP site. MMDBBIND records are currently being enriched in information using a human curation process to create high-quality records that will be part of RefBIND, a curated division of BIND.
As the data in BIND expands, so too must the underlying infrastructure. The public BIND site has been currently running on a shared mid-size web server. A transition to larger, redundant servers is currently being planned in conjunction with the launch of our SeqHound service, upon which BIND depends. SeqHound is our in-house integrated database (18), similar in scope to the Entrez system (12), which contains extensive C, C++ and Perl programming APIs.
New infrastructure for data analysis and visualization tools are also being built. One such tool is Pajek (13) (see Supplementary Material), for visualizing and analyzing large networks, although it has no support for analyzing networks in the context of sequence, structure and associated annotation. We are presently developing tools to address these issues.
An interaction network clustering tool, called Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE), has been developed to help focus on regions of biological interest. MCODE detects densely interconnected regions of a molecular interaction network, which may represent molecular complexes (Bader and Hogue, submitted).
FUNCTIONAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL (FAST)
Many proteins contain a number of structural and functional modules such as SH3, SH2, kinase and DNA binding domains (14). Most of these domains mediate protein interactions with other biomolecules. A collection of interaction information, such as BIND, enables the study of the relationships between protein domain architecture and protein–protein interactions. Specifically, it is possible to classify the interactors of a protein into distinct groups based on domain composition.
As part of our research and using BIND and SeqHound as platforms, we implemented FAST as an application that displays the domain annotation for a group of functionally related proteins. In BIND, these groups of related proteins can be proteins that interact with a common partner or are found together in molecular complexes. The domain annotation is from SeqHound which contains a complete RPS-BLAST analysis of the GenBank or dataset, using the Conserved Domain Database (15) performed on our 216 Beowulf cluster.
FAST has a web-based graphical interface, based on Macromedia Flash vector graphics, that displays a set of proteins and their domains. Vector graphics format was chosen as it provides improved resolution and zooming ability over bitmap images. FAST is accessible from BIND via interaction and molecular complex records. When accessed from an interaction record, the protein and its protein interactors in BIND are displayed. When accessed from a complex record, the protein subunits are displayed. Domain composition is shown as unique coloured horizontal bars above a line representing the sequence (Fig. 1). Clicking on the arrow beside each protein links a user to an expanded display where domains are shown with respect to the amino acid sequence of the protein. Users can zoom in and out to examine the boundaries of a domain of interest in more detail using the Flash control tool. A domain summary table for the protein set, containing links to information on each protein and domain, can be accessed from the FAST image page.
|
Visualization of a list of related proteins and their domains is a powerful approach to help direct future interaction studies. For example, the human and mouse variants of the protein tyrosine kinase Fyn each have nine recorded interactions in BIND (Fig. 1). The human and mouse forms of Fyn share six similar interactions, however, the mouse variant is known to interact with a second protein tyrosine kinase Vav, whereas the human Fyn currently has no recorded interaction with the human Vav homologue. Using FAST, it is easy to see that many Fyn-interacting proteins, including Vav, contain common cell-signaling modules such SH2 and SH3 domains. In combination with other tools and databases such as NCBI's CDART (17), human homologues with similar domain architectures to mouse Fyn interactors can be identified (e.g. VAV-3 and TIM). These proteins potentially interact with human Fyn.
FAST can also be used to study the topology and function of molecular complexes. A number of protein complexes were recently identified in large-scale mass-spectrometry studies (7,16). FAST can help decipher the interaction topology of these complexes by grouping proteins according to their domain composition. For example, part of the proteasome complex was identified using the protein Ygl004c as bait (BIND complex ID 11939). The domain architecture of the identified proteins reveals three distinct subgroups corresponding to three functional elements that control proteasome activity: ATPase (Rpt5, Rpt4, Rpt3, Rpt2, Rpt1), proteasome (Rpn9, Rpn7, Rpn6, Rpn5, Rpn3) and proteasome regulatory subunits (Rpn8, Rpn11).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary Material is available at NAR Online.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Tony Pawson for putting forth the idea of an interaction database pre-1998, Cheryl Wolting and Ian Donaldson for past contributions, Adrian Heilbut for helping to import recent molecular complex records and colleagues in the Hogue lab and at the SLRI for helpful discussions. D.B. wrote the FAST software. This work is funded by a consortium including Genome Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund, IBM and MDS Proteomics.
REFERENCES
- Fields,S. (2001) Proteomics. Proteomics in genomeland. Science, 291, 1221–1224.
[Free Full Text] - Xenarios,I., Salwinski,L., Duan,X.J., Higney,P., Kim,S.M. and Eisenberg,D. (2002) DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 303–305.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zanzoni,A., Montecchi-Palazzi,L., Quondam,M., Ausiello,G., Helmer-Citterich,M. and Cesareni,G. (2002) MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett., 513, 135–140.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bader,G.D., Donaldson,I., Wolting,C., Ouellette,B.F., Pawson,T. and Hogue,C.W. (2001) BIND—the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 242–245.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bader,G.D. and Hogue,C.W. (2000) BIND—a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Bioinformatics, 16, 465–477.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tong,A.H., Evangelista,M., Parsons,A.B., Xu,H., Bader,G.D., Page,N., Robinson,M., Raghibizadeh,S., Hogue,C.W., Bussey,H. et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science, 294, 2364–2368.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ho,Y., Gruhler,A., Heilbut,A., Bader,G.D., Moore,L., Adams,S.L., Millar,A., Taylor,P., Bennett,K., Boutilier,K. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415, 180–183.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tong,A.H., Drees,B., Nardelli,G., Bader,G.D., Brannetti,B., Castagnoli,L., Evangelista,M., Ferracuti,S., Nelson,B., Paoluzi,S. et al. (2002) A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science, 295, 321–324.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Westbrook,J., Feng,Z., Jain,S., Bhat,T.N., Thanki,N., Ravichandran,V., Gilliland,G.L., Bluhm,W., Weissig,H., Greer,D.S. et al. (2002) The Protein Data Bank: unifying the archive. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 245–248.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wang,Y., Anderson,J.B., Chen,J., Geer,L.Y., He,S., Hurwitz,D.I., Liebert,C.A., Madej,T., Marchler,G.H., Marchler-Bauer,A. et al. (2002) MMDB: Entrez's 3D-structure database. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 249–252.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Salama,J.J., Donaldson,I. and Hogue,C.W. (2002) Automatic annotation of BIND molecular interactions from three-dimensional structures. Biopolymers, 61, 111–120.[CrossRef]
- Schuler,G.D., Epstein,J.A., Ohkawa,H. and Kans,J.A. (1996) Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system. Methods Enzymol., 266, 141–162.[ISI][Medline]
- Batagelj,V. and Mrvar,A. (1998) Pajek–Program for large network analysis. Connections, 2, 47–57.
- Pawson,T. (1995) Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature, 373, 573–580.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Marchler-Bauer,A., Panchenko,A.R., Shoemaker,B.A., Thiessen,P.A., Geer,L.Y. and Bryant,S.H. (2002) CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 281–283.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gavin,A.C., Bosche,M., Krause,R., Grandi,P., Marzioch,M., Bauer,A., Schultz,J., Rick,J.M., Michon,A.M., Cruciat,C.M. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141–147.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Geor,L.Y., Domrachov,M., Lipman,D.J. and Bryant,S.H. (2002) CDART: Protein Homology by Domain Architecture. Genome Res., 12, 1619–1623.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Michalickova,K., Bader,G.D., Dumontier,M., Lieu,H.C., Betel,D., Issorlin,R. and Hogue,C.W. (2002) SeqHound: biological sequence and structure database as a platform for bioinformatics research. BMC Bioinformatics, in press.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. D. Bromberg, A. Ma'ayan, S. R. Neves, and R. Iyengar Design Logic of a Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling Network That Triggers Neurite Outgrowth Science, May 16, 2008; 320(5878): 903 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Hu, E. S. Snitkin, and C. DeLisi VisANT: an integrative framework for networks in systems biology Brief Bioinform, May 7, 2008; (2008) bbn020v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ideker and R. Sharan Protein networks in disease Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 644 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Orchard and H. Hermjakob The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cui, P. Li, G. Li, F. Xu, C. Zhao, Y. Li, Z. Yang, G. Wang, Q. Yu, Y. Li, et al. AtPID: Arabidopsis thaliana protein interactome database an integrative platform for plant systems biology Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D999 - D1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Saunders, S. Lyon, M. Day, B. Riley, E. Chenette, and S. Subramaniam The Molecule Pages database Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D700 - D706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Ruepp, B. Brauner, I. Dunger-Kaltenbach, G. Frishman, C. Montrone, M. Stransky, B. Waegele, T. Schmidt, O. N. Doudieu, V. Stumpflen, et al. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D646 - D650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pagel, M. Oesterheld, O. Tovstukhina, N. Strack, V. Stumpflen, and D. Frishman DIMA 2.0 predicted and known domain interactions Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D651 - D655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Donitz, B. Goemann, M. Lize, H. Michael, N. Sasse, E. Wingender, and A. P. Potapov EndoNet: an information resource about regulatory networks of cell-to-cell communication Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D689 - D694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Gong, D. Zhou, Y. Ren, Y. Wang, Z. Zuo, Y. Shen, F. Xiao, Q. Zhu, A. Hong, X. Zhou, et al. PepCyber:P~PEP: a database of human protein protein interactions mediated by phosphoprotein-binding domains Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D679 - D683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. P. Davis, D. T. Barkan, N. Eswar, J. H. McKerrow, and A. Sali Host pathogen protein interactions predicted by comparative modeling Protein Sci., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2585 - 2596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Geisler-Lee, N. O'Toole, R. Ammar, N. J. Provart, A. H. Millar, and M. Geisler A Predicted Interactome for Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, October 1, 2007; 145(2): 317 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Labarga, F. Valentin, M. Anderson, and R. Lopez Web Services at the European Bioinformatics Institute Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W6 - W11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Al-Shahrour, P. Minguez, J. Tarraga, I. Medina, E. Alloza, D. Montaner, and J. Dopazo FatiGO +: a functional profiling tool for genomic data. Integration of functional annotation, regulatory motifs and interaction data with microarray experiments Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W91 - W96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Dawelbait, C. Winter, Y. Zhang, C. Pilarsky, R. Grutzmann, J.-C. Heinrich, and M. Schroeder Structural templates predict novel protein interactions and targets from pancreas tumour gene expression data Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i115 - i124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. K. Lim, K. Wang, C. Lefebvre, and A. Califano Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i282 - i288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Calderwood, K. Venkatesan, L. Xing, M. R. Chase, A. Vazquez, A. M. Holthaus, A. E. Ewence, N. Li, T. Hirozane-Kishikawa, D. E. Hill, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and virus human protein interaction maps PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7606 - 7611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Przulj Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e177 - e183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Jayapandian, A. Chapman, V. G. Tarcea, C. Yu, A. Elkiss, A. Ianni, B. Liu, A. Nandi, C. Santos, P. Andrews, et al. Michigan Molecular Interactions (MiMI): putting the jigsaw puzzle together Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D566 - D571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Mak, M. Daly, B. Gruebel, and T. Ideker CellCircuits: a database of protein network models Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D538 - D545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Xu and Y. Li Discovering disease-genes by topological features in human protein-protein interaction network Bioinformatics, November 15, 2006; 22(22): 2800 - 2805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. George, J. Y. Liu, L. L. Feng, R. J. Bryson-Richardson, D. Fatkin, and M. A. Wouters Analysis of protein sequence and interaction data for candidate disease gene prediction Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2006; 34(19): e130 - e130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Yu and M. Gerstein Colloquium Papers: Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks PNAS, October 3, 2006; 103(40): 14724 - 14731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sprinzak, Y. Altuvia, and H. Margalit Colloquium Papers: Characterization and prediction of protein-protein interactions within and between complexes PNAS, October 3, 2006; 103(40): 14718 - 14723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Malik, L. Franke, and A. Siebes Combination of text-mining algorithms increases the performance Bioinformatics, September 1, 2006; 22(17): 2151 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Chen, W. Hsu, M. L. Lee, and S.-K. Ng Increasing confidence of protein interactomes using network topological metrics Bioinformatics, August 15, 2006; 22(16): 1998 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Massjouni, C. G. Rivera, and T. M. Murali VIRGO: computational prediction of gene functions. Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W340 - W344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Hull, K. Wolstencroft, R. Stevens, C. Goble, M. R. Pocock, P. Li, and T. Oinn Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W729 - W732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Dasika, A. Burgard, and C. D. Maranas A Computational Framework for the Topological Analysis and Targeted Disruption of Signal Transduction Networks Biophys. J., July 1, 2006; 91(1): 382 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. P. Davis, H. Braberg, M.-Y. Shen, U. Pieper, A. Sali, and M.S. Madhusudhan Protein complex compositions predicted by structural similarity Nucleic Acids Res., May 31, 2006; 34(10): 2943 - 2952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Guo, R. Liu, C. D. Shriver, H. Hu, and M. N. Liebman Assessing semantic similarity measures for the characterization of human regulatory pathways Bioinformatics, April 15, 2006; 22(8): 967 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Yu, A. Paccanaro, V. Trifonov, and M. Gerstein Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques Bioinformatics, April 1, 2006; 22(7): 823 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Dinakarpandian, Y. Lee, K. Vishwanath, and R. Lingambhotla MachineProse: an Ontological Framework for Scientific Assertions J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2006; 13(2): 220 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Wu, J. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Zhang, B. Shi, X. Zhu, Z. Zhang, G. Skogerbo, L. Chen, H. Lu, et al. NPInter: the noncoding RNAs and protein related biomacromolecules interaction database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D150 - D152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. W. Mewes, D. Frishman, K. F. X. Mayer, M. Munsterkotter, O. Noubibou, P. Pagel, T. Rattei, M. Oesterheld, A. Ruepp, and V. Stumpflen MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D169 - D172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Guldener, M. Munsterkotter, M. Oesterheld, P. Pagel, A. Ruepp, H.-W. Mewes, and V. Stumpflen MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D436 - D441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Potapov, I. Liebich, J. Donitz, K. Schwarzer, N. Sasse, T. Schoeps, T. Crass, and E. Wingender EndoNet: an information resource about endocrine networks Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D540 - D545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Dolinski and D. Botstein Changing perspectives in yeast research nearly a decade after the genome sequence Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1611 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Cusick, N. Klitgord, M. Vidal, and D. E. Hill Interactome: gateway into systems biology Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2005; 14(suppl_2): R171 - R181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Aytuna, A. Gursoy, and O. Keskin Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces Bioinformatics, June 15, 2005; 21(12): 2850 - 2855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. H. Lee and D. Lee Modularized learning of genetic interaction networks from biological annotations and mRNA expression data Bioinformatics, June 1, 2005; 21(11): 2739 - 2747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Espadaler, R. Aragues, N. Eswar, M. A. Marti-Renom, E. Querol, F. X. Aviles, A. Sali, and B. Oliva Detecting remotely related proteins by their interactions and sequence similarity PNAS, May 17, 2005; 102(20): 7151 - 7156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. O. Jonsdottir, F. S. Jorgensen, and S. Brunak Prediction methods and databases within chemoinformatics: emphasis on drugs and drug candidates Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2145 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. P. Davis and A. Sali PIBASE: a comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces Bioinformatics, May 1, 2005; 21(9): 1901 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Kemmeren, T. T. J. P. Kockelkorn, T. Bijma, R. Donders, and F. C. P. Holstege Predicting gene function through systematic analysis and quality assessment of high-throughput data Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1644 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Droit, G. G Poirier, and J. M Hunter Experimental and bioinformatic approaches for interrogating protein-protein interactions to determine protein function J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 263 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Orchard, H. Hermjakob, and R. Apweiler Annotating |