Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Fujikawa et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (1) 82-92.
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (74K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 4 February 2004

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 32, No. 2 865
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Corrigendum

Structural and biochemical analyses of hemimethylated DNA binding by the SeqA protein

Norie Fujikawa, Hitoshi Kurumizaka, Osamu Nureki, Yoshinori Tanaka, Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe, Sota Hiraga and Shigeyuki Yokoyama

Nucleic Acids Res. (2004) 32, 82–92

The authors would like to apologise for an error that appears in Figure 1D. The lane 3 label should read GmATG not GmACG. Please find herewith the corrected version of Figure 1. This change does not affect the Discussion or Conclusions.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. SeqA71–181–DNA binding analyses. (A) The hemimethylated G-mA-T-C 14mer DNA used in the DNA binding analysis. The region corresponding to the hemimethylated G-mA-T-C 10mer DNA used in the crystallization of the SeqA71–181–DNA complex is colored, and is numbered. The recognition sequence of SeqA is colored blue in the box, and the hemimethylated mA:T base pair is colored red. ‘Me’ indicates the N6-methyl group. Numbers without asterisks indicate base positions from the 5' end of the methylated strand, and numbers with asterisks indicate base positions from the 3' end of the unmethylated strand. (B–D) Effect of base pair replacements at the G4:C4* (B), T6:A6* (C) and C7:G7* (D) base pairs. Replaced base pairs are indicated by white letters on the top of each panel. Lane 1 is a negative control experiment without protein, and lane 2 is a positive control. (E) Effect of mismatch replacements at the mA5:T5* position on the DNA binding. Lane 1 is a negative control experiment without protein, and lane 2 is a positive control. The T5* residue was replaced by G (lane 3), A (lane 4) and C (lane 5). Graphic representations of the DNA binding of the SeqA71–181 mutants are presented in the bottom panels (B–E). The amounts of complex formation relative to that accomplished by the wild-type SeqA71–181 protein are presented. Average and SD values from three independent experiments are presented.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (74K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?