Skip Navigation

Erratum for Qin et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (18) 5471-5479.
Erratum for Nag et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (18) 5677-5684.
Erratum for Mariño-Ramírez et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (19) 5972.
Erratum for Mariño-Ramírez et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (3) 949-958.
Nucleic Acids Research 2005 32(22):6718; doi:10.1093/nar/gkh993
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (33K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 6 January 2005

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 22 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Corrigenda

The publishers would like to apologize for the above corrigenda being omitted from the print issue. The complete corrigenda are reprinted on the following page.

doi:10.1093/nar/gkh928

CORRIGENDA

Empirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis

Li-Xuan Qin, Kathleen F. Kerr and Contributing Members of the Toxicogenomics Research Consortium

Nucleic Acids Res. (2004) 32, 5471–5479.

The authors apologize that an incorrect citation was given for reference 8. The correct reference is:

Cui,X. and Churchill,G.A. (2003) Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol., 4, 210. http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/4/210

doi:10.1093/nar/gkh930

Both CAG repeats and inverted DNA repeats stimulate spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Dilip K. Nag, Manisha Suri and Erin K. Stenson

Nucleic Acids Res. (2004) 32, 5677–5684.

The authors apologize that an incorrect triplet repeat was given in the second paragraph of the Introduction to their article. The correct triplet repeat is given in the sentence below.

Among all of the possible triplet repeats, only three (CAG.CTG, CGG.CCG and GAA.TTC; hereafter, CAG, CGG and GAA, respectively) are known to be associated with repeat disorders and fragile sites.

doi:10.1093/nar/gkh938

Statistical analysis of over-represented words in human promoter sequences

Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez, John L. Spuge, Gavin C. Kanga and David Landsman

Nucleic Acids Res. (2004) 32, 949–958.

A bug was discovered in the program that produced the z-score analysis. The bug did not qualitatively change the scientific conclusions of the paper. Corrected quantitative data have been posted on the URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Spouge/Articles/index.html, under the heading
3. Marino-Ramirez, D. Landsman, and J. L. Spouge
z-Score Statistic and Human Promoters
(2003) Archived zip file
and on the URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Landsman/HRSE/.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (33K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?