Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Kemp et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 33 (1) 325-336.
Nucleic Acids Research 2005 33(2):805; doi:10.1093/nar/gki229
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (23K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (25K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leffak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leffak, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 3 February 2005

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Corrigendum

The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A alters the pattern of DNA replication origin activity in human cells

Michael G. Kemp, Maloy Ghosh, Guoqi Liu and Michael Leffak

The authors would like to apologize for errors in the legends to Figures 6 and 8. The two correct legends are given below.

Figure 6. TSA treatment alters the pattern of replication origin activity in HeLa cells. Asynchronously growing HeLa cells were treated for 4, 8 or 24 h with 100 ng/ml TSA and loaded on alkaline gels for isolation of 1–2 kb nascent DNA. Purified nascent DNA was quantitated by OliGreen fluorescence and quantitated by real-time PCR. The data presented are the averages (and SD values) of triplicate analysis on at least three independent preparations of nascent DNA.

Figure 8. TSA alters nascent strand abundance at uncharacterized sites. Nascent DNA isolated from untreated cells or cells treated with 100 ng/ml TSA for 4, 8, 24 or 48 h was amplified by PCR with 10mer primer 1 (A), 10mer primer 2 (B) or a mixture of primers 1 and 2 (C) using equal starting amounts of DNA. Products were purified, run on 2% agarose gels and stained with EtBr (inverse image). Samples from independent PCRs are shown to confirm the reproducibility of the assay.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (23K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (25K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leffak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leffak, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?