Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2006 34(Database Issue):D632-D636; doi:10.1093/nar/gkj034
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (976K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (295K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawaji, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashizaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawaji, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashizaki, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2006, Vol. 34, Database issue D632-D636
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions{at}oxfordjournals.org


Article

CAGE Basic/Analysis Databases: the CAGE resource for comprehensive promoter analysis

Hideya Kawaji1, Takeya Kasukawa1,2, Shiro Fukuda2, Shintaro Katayama2,*, Chikatoshi Kai2, Jun Kawai2,3, Piero Carninci2,3 and Yoshihide Hayashizaki2,3

1NTT Software Corporation Teisan Kannai Building 209, Yamashita-cho Naka-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 231-8551, Japan 2Genome Exploration Research Group (Genome Network Project Core Group), RIKEN Genomic Sciences Center (GSC), RIKEN Yokohama Institute 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan 3Genome Science Laboratory, Discovery Research Institute, RIKEN Wako Institute 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan

*To whom corresponding should be addressed. Tel: +81 45 503 9222; Fax: +81 45 503 9216; Email: rgscerg{at}gsc.riken.jp

Received August 15, 2005. Revised September 26, 2005. Accepted September 26, 2005.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
Cap-analysis gene expression (CAGE) Basic and Analysis Databases store an original resource produced by CAGE, which measures expression levels of transcription starting sites by sequencing large amounts of transcript 5' ends, termed CAGE tags. Millions of human and mouse high-quality CAGE tags derived from different conditions in >20 tissues consisting of >250 RNA samples are essential for identification of novel promoters and promoter characterization in the aspect of expression profile. CAGE Basic Database is a primary database of the CAGE resource, RNA samples, CAGE libraries, CAGE clone and tag sequences and so on. CAGE Analysis Database stores promoter related information, such as counts of related transcripts, CpG islands and conserved genome region. It also provides expression profiles at base pair and promoter levels. Both databases are based on the same framework, CAGE tag starting sites, tag clusters for defining promoters and transcriptional units (TUs). Their associations and TU attributes are available to find promoters of interest. These databases were provided for Functional Annotation Of Mouse 3 (FANTOM3), an international collaboration research project focusing on expanding the transcriptome and subsequent analyses. Now access is free for all users through the World Wide Web at http://fantom3.gsc.riken.jp/.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
Cap-analysis gene expression (CAGE) is a high-throughput method to measure expression levels by counting large amounts of sequenced capped 5' ends of transcripts, termed CAGE tags (1). A similar approach is proposed as 5' end SAGE (2). The average length of these 5' end tags of transcripts is 20 bp and the tags are aligned with the genome directly, although original SAGE (3) tags are aligned with 3' ends of transcripts (4). CAGE tags are an essential resource for profiling transcriptional starting sites and can be used for profiling gene expressions by counting CAGE tags associated with genes. Millions of mouse and human high-quality CAGE tags derived from different conditions in >20 tissues consisting of >250 RNA samples are subjected for analysis in the international collaboration research project, Functional Annotation Of Mouse 3 (FANTOM3). The CAGE tags are used for the analysis of the transcriptional landscape of mammalian genome (5), antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome (6), comprehensive promoter analysis (P.Carninci, A.Sandelin, B.Lenhard, S.Katayama, K.Shimokawa, J.Ponjavic, C.A.Semple, M.S.Taylor, P.Engstrom, M.C.Frith, A.R.Forrest, W.B.Alkema, S.L.Tan, C.Plessy, R.Kodzius, T.Ravasi, T.Kasukawa, S.Fukuda, M.Kanamori-Katayama, Y.Kitazume, H.Kawaji, C.Kai, H.Konno, K.Nakano, S.Mottagui-Tabar, P.Arner, A.Chesi, S.Gustincich, F.Persichetti, H.Suzuki, S.M.Grimmond, C.Wells, V.Orlando, C.Wahlestedt, E.T.Liu, M.Harbers, J.Kawai, V.B.Bajic, D.A.Hume and Y.Hayashizaki, manuscript submitted) and subsequent analyses.

We constructed two database systems to utilize the CAGE resource, CAGE Basic and Analysis Databases. Their aims are (i) to manage and trace the CAGE data consistently and (ii) to demonstrate the promoter usage (using CAGE and other data). The former is required to support the novel experimental processes of CAGE and to manage the large amount of RNA samples provided in the FANTOM3 collaboration. The latter is to support subsequent analyses using all of the required data, without influence of our management of the CAGE data. Additionally, we constructed CAGE Expression 3D Viewer for novel type of expression view (K.Shimokawa, Y.Okamura-Oho, C.Kai, P.Carninci and Y.Hayashizaki, manuscript in preparation). The database systems described here were used in FANTOM3 and are now publicly accessible. Here, we present the systems' overview and functions to facilitate the use of the CAGE resource.


    DATA BASIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
A consistent and comprehensive dataset is crucial to allow biological analyses in different kinds of viewpoints. Our two database systems are built on the same basis: CAGE tag starting site (CTSS), tag cluster (TC) and transcriptional unit (TU).

CTSS is a nucleotide position on the genome from which an alignment of CAGE tag starts. Counts of CAGE tags sharing the same starting sites represent expression profiles in base pairs level. TC is an operationally defined unit to characterize promoters. It is constructed by clustering 5' end overlapped region of transcripts (P.Carninci, A.Sandelin, B.Lenhard, S.Katayama, K.Shimokawa, J.Ponjavic, C.A.Semple, M.S.Taylor, P.Engstrom, M.C.Frith, A.R.Forrest, W.B.Alkema, S.L.Tan, C.Plessy, R.Kodzius, T.Ravasi, T.Kasukawa, S.Fukuda, M.Kanamori-Katayama, Y.Kitazume, H.Kawaji, C.Kai, H.Konno, K.Nakano, S.Mottagui-Tabar, P.Arner, A.Chesi, S.Gustincich, F.Persichetti, H.Suzuki, S.M.Grimmond, C.Wells, V.Orlando, C.Wahlestedt, E.T.Liu, M.Harbers, J.Kawai, V.B.Bajic, D.A.Hume and Y.Hayashizaki, manuscript submitted), such as 5' end 20 bp long of RIKEN full-length cDNA and RIKEN-5'-expressed sequence tag (EST), 5' end tags of GIS (7) and GSC (4) ditags, DBTSS (8), 5' end SAGE and CAGE. Of these, overlapping sequences on the genome with at least 1 bp are clustered, and define a TC. Counts of CAGE tags within TCs represent expression profiles on promoter level. TU is also an operationally defined unit proposed in FANTOM2 (9), defined as a region or a set of discontinuous regions in the genome from where all exons of a mature full-length mRNA are derived (10). Counts of CAGE tags within TUs represent expression profiles on gene level. TUs are associated with Entrez Gene (11) and gene ontology term (12) by means of transcripts belonging to them, if possible. CTSS are associated with TCs, and TCs are associated with TUs. Users can access the CAGE resource of interest by searching TUs with their own keywords.


    SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
Figure 1 is an overview of the CAGE database systems. CAGE Basic Database is a primary database of the CAGE resource, and provides a central view of CAGE resources. CAGE Analysis Database stores TC related information, and provides a central view of promoters. As a complementary system, Genomic Elements Database is constructed to provide a central view of genome positions. Their main contents are described in Table 1. CAGE Analysis Database would be the most convenient gateway for users, especially new to the CAGE data. Hyperlinks from the database to the others are available depending on their interests, CAGE Basic Database for CAGE sequences themselves and Genomic Elements Database for a conventional genome view.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 An overview of the CAGE supporting systems and data flow among them.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Main contents of the database systems

 

    CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
In the CAGE protocol, 5' ends of full-length cDNA synthesized from RNA samples are cleaved with MmeI, a class II restriction enzyme, which cleaves 20/18 bp outside the recognition sequence. The cleaved 5' end cDNA tags (CAGE tags) are ligated to form concatemers and cloned as CAGE clones in CAGE library. After sequencing the CAGE clone, CAGE tag sequences are extracted and mapped computationally onto the genome.

CAGE clone sequence, CAGE tag location on the clone and its genome mapping information are stored to facilitate their traceability. To manage a broad range of RNA samples provided in the FANTOM3 collaboration, RNA sample ID, tissue name, developmental stage, sample treatment, cell type and collaboration name are stored. The amount of the CAGE data derived from each RNA sample is presented to examine if targeted samples are analyzed with CAGE and to which extent CAGE tags in the samples were sequenced.


    CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
Expression levels are measured by counting associated CAGE tags, and they can be used to measure different levels of expression profiles from base pair to chromosomal band level. Two levels of expression profiles are presented in the CAGE Analysis Database for each RNA sample: base pair scale expressions inside a TC are displayed in histogram (Figure 2A), and TC expressions within a TU are represented by a heat map like representation (Figure 2B). CAGE tag counts and transcripts per million, (tag counts)/(total mapped tag counts in the sample) x 1 000 000, are used as units of expression level. Additionally, statistical significances of expression fluctuations between RNA samples are also accessible in a matrix (Figure 2C). They provide users with graphical views of transcriptional start variation, promoter variation and expression fluctuation of promoters.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Screenshots of CAGE Analysis Database: (A) a view of base pair scale expression within a TC, where CAGE tag count of each genome position is displayed in histogram, (B) a view of TC expressions within a TU, in which expression levels are represented by a heat map like representation, (C) a view of statistical significances of expression fluctuations between RNA samples, and their E-values are displayed in a matrix.

 
Rarely expressed promoters contain only a few tags. Although our RACE experiment using an oligo-capping method supported 91% of the tested cases (5), some CAGE tags could be artifacts caused by some errors in library preparation, sequencing and genome mapping. To provide some evidences for promoters, associations of TCs with (genome) conserved regions (13), CpG islands (14), predicted core promoter elements (1517) and different transcript counts are stored. Users can search TCs with different reliability levels by specifying search conditions.


    GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
Genomic Elements Database is a supplementary database to the two CAGE databases. The aim is to integrate TCs and other data onto the genome and display them in a conventional way. Generic Genome Browser (18) with MySQL DBMS is used to present a genome view. Candidates of imprinted transcripts in EICO DB (19,20), transcription factors in TFdb (21) and other data in the UCSC Genome Browser Database (22) are stored in addition to the utilized data above. This system is also utilized in full-length cDNA annotation in FANTOM3 (5).


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
The CAGE database systems have successfully provided a large amount of mouse and human CAGE tags derived from various RNA samples for the FANTOM3 project, resulting in biological analyses in various viewpoints. The systems have supported these analyses by providing central views of CAGE resource, promoter and genome position depending on the aspects of interests to researchers. They are publicly available now, and are expected to promote subsequent analyses by using the CAGE resource in scientific research community.


    AVAILABILITY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 
The database systems described here are hyperlinked from http://fantom3.gsc.riken.jp/. Their user's guide, glossary and/or database schema are available from their help pages, and their raw data files, table definitions in SQL and tab-delimited data files, are also available for download from http://fantom3.gsc.riken.jp/download.html.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We would like to thank A. Hasegawa for data processing; A. Karlsson for English editing; K. Nakano and H. Murakami for building computational systems; K. Yoshida for support; and all members of the FANTOM consortium. This study was supported by Research Grant for the RIKEN Genome Exploration Research Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government to Y.H., a grant of the Genome Network Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. to Y.H., Grant for the Strategic Programs for R&D of RIKEN to Y.H. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by RIKEN.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DATA BASIS
 SYSTEM OVERVIEW
 CAGE BASIC DATABASE
 CAGE ANALYSIS DATABASE
 GENOMIC ELEMENTS DATABASE
 CONCLUSION
 AVAILABILITY
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Shiraki, T., Kondo, S., Katayama, S., Waki, K., Kasukawa, T., Kawaji, H., Kodzius, R., Watahiki, A., Nakamura, M., Arakawa, T., et al. (2003) Cap analysis gene expression for high-throughput analysis of transcriptional starting point and identification of promoter usage Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 15776–15781[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  2. Hashimoto, S., Suzuki, Y., Kasai, Y., Morohoshi, K., Yamada, T., Sese, J., Morishita, S., Sugano, S., Matsushima, K. (2004) 5'-end SAGE for the analysis of transcriptional start sites Nat. Biotechnol, . 22, 1146–1149[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  3. Velculescu, V.E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B., Kinzler, K.W. (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression Science, 270, 484–487[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  4. Harbers, M. and Carninci, P. (2005) Tag-based approaches for transcriptome research and genome annotation Nature Methods, 2, 495–502 .

  5. Carninci, P., Kasukawa, T., Katayama, S., Gough, J., Frith, M.C., Maeda, N., Oyama, R., Ravasi, T., Lenhard, B., Wells, C., et al. (2005) The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome Science, 309, 1559–1563[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  6. Katayama, S., Tomaru, Y., Kasukawa, T., Waki, K., Nakanishi, M., Nakamura, M., Nishida, H., Yap, C.C., Suzuki, M., Kawai, J., et al. (2005) Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome Science, 309, 1564–1566[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  7. Ng, P., Wei, C.L., Sung, W.K., Chiu, K.P., Lipovich, L., Ang, C.C., Gupta, S., Shahab, A., Ridwan, A., Wong, C.H., et al. (2005) Gene identification signature (GIS) analysis for transcriptome characterization and genome annotation Nature Methods, 2, 105–111 .

  8. Suzuki, Y., Yamashita, R., Sugano, S., Nakai, K. (2004) DBTSS, DataBase of Transcriptional Start Sites: progress report 2004 Nucleic Acids Res, . 32, D78–D81[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  9. Okazaki, Y., Furuno, M., Kasukawa, T., Adachi, J., Bono, H., Kondo, S., Nikaido, I., Osato, N., Saito, R., Suzuki, H., et al. (2002) Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60 770 full-length cDNAs Nature, 420, 563–573[CrossRef][Medline] .

  10. Kasukawa, T., Katayama, S., Kawaji, H., Suzuki, H., Hume, D.A., Hayashizaki, Y. (2004) Construction of representative transcript and protein sets of human, mouse, and rat as a platform for their transcriptome and proteome analysis Genomics, 84, 913–921[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  11. Maglott, D., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K.D., Tatusova, T. (2005) Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI Nucleic Acids Res, . 33, D54–D58[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  12. Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Eppig, J.T., et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nature Genet, . 25, 25–29[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  13. Kent, W.J., Baertsch, R., Hinrichs, A., Miller, W., Haussler, D. (2003) Evolution's cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 11484–11489[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  14. Gardiner-Garden, M. and Frommer, M. (1987) CpG islands in vertebrate genomes J. Mol. Biol, . 196, 261–282[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  15. Smale, S.T. and Kadonaga, J.T. (2003) The RNA polymerase II core promoter Annu. Rev. Biochem, . 72, 449–479[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  16. Bucher, P. (1990) Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences J. Mol. Biol, . 212, 563–578[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  17. Schmid, C.D., Praz, V., Delorenzi, M., Perier, R., Bucher, P. (2004) The Eukaryotic Promoter Database EPD: the impact of in silico primer extension Nucleic Acids Res, . 32, D82–D85[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  18. Stein, L.D., Mungall, C., Shu, S., Caudy, M., Mangone, M., Day, A., Nickerson, E., Stajich, J.E., Harris, T.W., Arva, A., et al. (2002) The generic genome browser: a building block for a model organism system database Genome Res, . 12, 1599–1610[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  19. Nikaido, I., Saito, C., Wakamoto, A., Tomaru, Y., Arakawa, T., Hayashizaki, Y., Okazaki, Y. (2004) EICO (Expression-based Imprint Candidate Organizer): finding disease-related imprinted genes Nucleic Acids Res, . 32, D548–D551[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  20. Nikaido, I., Saito, C., Mizuno, Y., Meguro, M., Bono, H., Kadomura, M., Kono, T., Morris, G.A., Lyons, P.A., Oshimura, M., et al. (2003) Discovery of imprinted transcripts in te mouse transcriptome using large-scale expression profiling Genome Res, . 13, 1402–1409[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  21. Kanamori, M., Konno, H., Osato, N., Kawai, J., Hayashizaki, Y., Suzuki, H. (2004) A genome-wide and nonredundant mouse transcription factor database Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, . 322, 787–793[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  22. Karolchik, D., Baertsch, R., Diekhans, M., Furey, T.S., Hinrichs, A., Lu, Y.T., Roskin, K.M., Schwartz, M., Sugnet, C.W., Thomas, D.J., et al. (2003) The UCSC Genome Browser Database Nucleic Acids Res, . 31, 51–54[Abstract/Free Full Text] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
O. Wallerman, M. Motallebipour, S. Enroth, K. Patra, M. S. R. Bysani, J. Komorowski, and C. Wadelius
Molecular interactions between HNF4a, FOXA2 and GABP identified at regulatory DNA elements through ChIP-sequencing
Nucleic Acids Res., October 12, 2009; (2009) gkp823v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. G. Dineen, A. Wilm, P. Cunningham, and D. G. Higgins
High DNA melting temperature predicts transcription start site location in human and mouse
Nucleic Acids Res., October 9, 2009; (2009) gkp821v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Whitington, A. C. Perkins, and T. L. Bailey
High-throughput chromatin information enables accurate tissue-specific prediction of transcription factor binding sites
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(1): 14 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. Rada-Iglesias, A. Ameur, P. Kapranov, S. Enroth, J. Komorowski, T. R. Gingeras, and C. Wadelius
Whole-genome maps of USF1 and USF2 binding and histone H3 acetylation reveal new aspects of promoter structure and candidate genes for common human disorders
Genome Res., March 1, 2008; 18(3): 380 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. Weigelt, W. Ernst, Y. Walczak, S. Ebert, T. Loenhardt, M. Klug, M. Rehli, B. H. F. Weber, and T. Langmann
Dap12 expression in activated microglia from retinoschisin-deficient retina and its PU.1-dependent promoter regulation
J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 82(6): 1564 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. C. Frith, J. Ponjavic, D. Fredman, C. Kai, J. Kawai, P. Carninci, Y. Hayshizaki, and A. Sandelin
Evolutionary turnover of mammalian transcription start sites
Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 713 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (976K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (295K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawaji, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashizaki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawaji, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hayashizaki, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?