Article |
BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems
European Bioinformatics Institute EMBL Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SD, UK 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 2Keck Graduate Institute 535 Watson Drive, Claremont, CA 91711, USA 3STRI, University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK 4Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa 5Control and Dynamical Systems, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1223 494521; Fax: +44 1223 494468; Email: lenov{at}ebi.ac.uk
Received July 29, 2005. Revised October 4, 2005. Accepted October 16, 2005.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
BioModels Database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/), part of the international initiative BioModels.net, provides access to published, peer-reviewed, quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. Each model is carefully curated to verify that it corresponds to the reference publication and gives the proper numerical results. Curators also annotate the components of the models with terms from controlled vocabularies and links to other relevant data resources. This allows the users to search accurately for the models they need. The models can currently be retrieved in the SBML format, and import/export facilities are being developed to extend the spectrum of formats supported by the resource.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
The number of quantitative models trying to explain various aspects of the cellular machinery is increasing at a steady pace, thanks in part to the rising popularity of systems biology (1). However, as for all types of knowledge, such models will only be as useful as their access and reuse is easy for all scientists. A first step was to define standard descriptions to encode quantitative models in machine-readable formats. Example of such formats are CellML (2) and the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) (3,4). The biomedical community now needs public integrated resources, where authors can deposit, in controlled formats, the models they describe in scientific publications.
Some general repositories of quantitative models have been made available, such as the CellML repository CellML repository [(5), http://www.cellml.org/examples/repository/index.html] JWS Online (6) and the former SBML repository. In addition specialist repositories include SenseLab ModelDB (7), the Database of Quantitative Cellular Signalling (DOCQS) (8) and SigPath (9). However no general public resource existed that allowed the user to browse, search and retrieve annotated models
Here we present BioModels Database, developed as part of the BioModels.net initiative (http://www.biomodels.net/). BioModels.net is a collaboration between the SBML Team (USA), the EMBL-EBI (UK), the Systems Biology Group of the Keck Graduate Institute (USA), the Systems Biology Institute (Japan) and JWS Online at Stellenbosch University (South Africa). Its aims are as follows: (i) to define agreed-upon standards for model curation, (ii) to define agreed-upon vocabularies for annotating models with connections to biological data resources and (iii) to provide a free, centralized, publicly accessible database of annotated, computational models in SBML and other structured formats.
BioModels Database is an annotated resource of quantitative models of biomedical interest. Models are carefully curated to verify their correspondence to their source articles. They are also extensively annotated, with (i) terms from controlled vocabularies, such as disease codes and Gene Ontology terms and (ii) links to other data resources, such as sequence or pathway databases. Researchers in the biomedical and life science communities can then search and retrieve models related to a particular disease, biological process or molecular complex.
|
SUBMISSION, CURATION AND ANNOTATION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
Models can be submitted by anyone to the curation pipeline of the database (Figure 1). At present, BioModels Database aims to store and annotate models that can be encoded with SBML. CellML models are also accepted. These model formats are synonymous with models that can be integrated or iterated forwards in time, such as ordinary differential equation models. Although we are aware that this means we can cover only a restricted part of the modeling field, we make this our initial focus for the following reason: (i) since a crucial part of the curation process is the verification that the models produce numerical results similar to the ones described in the reference article, iterative simulations over ranges of parameter values and perturbation of simulations at equilibrium are mandatory and (ii) a very large number of such models have already been published, and the pace of their publication is increasing steadily. As a consequence, they are sufficient to consume all the curation workforce we have, and we can envision to gather in the near future.
|
To be accepted in BioModels Database, a model must be compliant with MIRIAM, the Minimal Information Requested in the Annotation of Models (10). One of the requirements of MIRIAM is that a model has to be associated with a reference description that provides directly, or through references, the structure of the model, the necessary quantitative parameters and presents the results of numerical analysis of the model. BioModels Database further refines the notion of reference description, by considering only models described in the peer-reviewed scientific litterature.
A series of automated tasks are performed by the pipeline prior to human intervention (see Materials and Methods for details):
- Verification that the file is well-formed XML.
- If necessary, conversion to the latest version of SBML.
- Verification of the syntax of SBML.
- Series of consistency checks, enforcing the validity of the model.
If any of those steps is not completed, a member of the distributed team of curators can reject the model, or instead correct it and resubmit it to the pipeline. The last and most important step, of the curation process, is verifying that when instantiated in a simulation, the model provides results corresponding to the reference scientific article. Curators do not normally challenge the biological relevance of the models, and assume the peer-review process already filtered out unsuitable contributions. However, in specific cases, curators can spot mistakes in an article and, with the agreement of the authors, modify the model accordingly. Once the model is verified to be valid SBML, and to correspond well to the article, it is accepted in the production database for annotation.
In order to be confident in reusing an encoded model, one should be able to trace its origin, and the people who were involved in its inception. The following information is therefore added to the model: (i) either a PubMed identifier (http://www.pubmed.gov) or a DOI (http://www.doi.org) or an URL that permits identifying the peer-review article describing the model; (ii) name and contact details of the individuals who actually contributed to the encoding of the model in its present form; (iii) name and contact of the the person who finally entered the model in the production database and who should be contacted if there is a problem with the encoding of the model or the annotation.
In addition, model components are annotated with references to relevant resources, such as terms from controled vocabularies (Taxonomy, Gene Ontology, ChEBI, etc.) and links to other databases (UniProt, KEGG, Reactome, etc.). This annotation is a crucial feature of BioModels Database in that it permits the unambiguous identification of molecular species or reactions and enables effective search stategies.
|
SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
The thorough annotation of models allows a triple search strategy to be run in order to retrieve models of interest (Figure 2).
|
The models converted to SBML are stored directly in an XML native database (Xindice, http://xml.apache.org/xindice/), enabling those models and/or their components to be retrieved based on the content of their elements and attributes (using XPath, http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath). For instance, the user can search for a given string of characters in the id, name and notes elements of each model component.
Models can be retrieved by searching the annotation database directly, using SQL. Although this search is quick, it requires knowing the exact identifiers used by curators to annotate a model and relate it to third party resources, such as UniProt accession, Gene Ontology Term ID, etc.
We, therefore, implemented a more advanced search system. A user can actually search third party resources directly, such as PubMed, Gene Ontology and UniProt, for instance with literal text matching. The search system retrieves the relevant identifiers and then searches BioModels Database for the models annotated with those identifiers. As a consequence, the user can retrieve all the models dealing with ‘cell cycle’ or ‘MAPK’, without having to type ‘GO:0007049’ or ‘P27361’.
Several searches of any of the three types can also be run in parallel, the results being thereafter combined with boolean operators.
Once retrieved, the models of interest can be downloaded in SBML Level 2 format. A number of export filters are under development to provide the models in a wider range of formats.
BioModels Database is copyrighted by The BioModels Team, i.e. the set of individuals developing the resource. However, the copyright on the database does not imply copyright of the original models in BioModels Database. Each individual model retains the copyright assigned by both the creator(s) of the model and the author(s) of the reference publication. Users may distribute verbatim copies of the entire content of BioModels Database, including the models and their annotations, or a subset of the models. Users may also modify any of the models in any way, provided that at least one of the following condition is fulfilled:
- The modified model is used only within the user's organization.
- The modifications are placed in the Public Domain, or otherwise made Freely Available by allowing the Copyright Holders of the model to include the modifications in the standard version of the model.
- The modified model is renamed, and both BioModels Database identifier and any mention of the Copyright Holders of the model is removed.
- Other distribution arrangements are made directly with the Copyright Holders of the model(s) in question.
This restricted license has been rendered necessary by the specific nature of the data distributed by BioModels Database. If a user of BioModels Database downloads a kinetics model and modifies it, the resulting model could be meaningless, or even worse, exhibits a behaviour completely different of what was initially meant by the authors and the creators. Therefore, we thought that the best compromise was to let complete freedom of reuse and modification, providing that BioModels Database is not associated with any modification.
|
PERSPECTIVE |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
Although BioModels Database is a very recent resource, it has already gained momentum thanks to the support of the SBML community, which has started to submit models, and major scientific publishing actors such as Nature Publishing Group, which has publicized the launch of the database. The growth of BioModels Database is currently limited, by the size of the curation workforce, to only a dozen new models a month. We expect that the existence of this public resource will contribute to an improvement in the quality of the models published by establishing an additional process for evaluating those models. The increase in quality and the continuously improved support of SBML by modelling tools should increase the speed of curation. Meanwhile, we will continue to improve the search and retrieval facilities, and support more export formats, so that users can directy use the models contained in the database even in non-SBML compliant tools.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Authors thank G. Bard Ermentrout, Sarah Keating, Joanne Matthews and Nicolas Rodriguez for sharing their code. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by EMBL.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONSUBMISSION, CURATION AND...SEARCH AND RETRIEVALPERSPECTIVEREFERENCES |
|---|
- Kitano, H. (2005) International alliances for quantitative modeling in systems biology Mol. Syst. Biol, . doi: 10.1038/msb4100011 .
- Lloyd, C., Halstead, M.D., Nielsen, P.F. (2004) CellML: its future, present and past Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol, . 85, 433–450[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .
- Hucka, M., Bolouri, H., Finney, A., Sauro, H.M., Doyle, J.C., Kitano, H., Arkin, A.P., Bornstein, B.J., Bray, D., et al. (2003) The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models Bioinformatics, 19, 524–531
[Abstract/Free Full Text] . - Finney, A. and Hucka, M. (2003) Systems biology markup language: level 2 and beyond Biochem. Soc. Trans, . 31, 1472–1473[Web of Science][Medline] .
- Lloyd, C. The CellML repository .
- Olivier, B.G. and Snoep, J.L. (2004) Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS online Bioinformatics, 20, 2143–2144
[Abstract/Free Full Text] . - Migliore, M., Morse, T.M., Davison, A.P., Marenco, L., Shepherd, G.M., Hines, M.L. (2003) ModelDB: making models publicly accessible to support computational neuroscience Neuroinformatics, 1, 135–139[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .
- Sivakumaran, S., Hariharaputran, S., Mishra, J., Bhalla, U. (2003) The database of quantitative cellular signaling: management and analysis of chemical kinetic models of signaling networks Bioinformatics, 19, 408–415
[Abstract/Free Full Text] . - Campagne, F., Neves, S., Chang, C.W., Skrabanek, L., Ram, P.T., Iyengar, R., Weinstein, H. (2004) Quantitative information management for the biochemical computation of cellular networks Sci. STKE, 248, PL11 .
- Le Novère, N., Finney, A., Hucka, M., Bhalla, U., Campagne, F., Collado-Vides, J., Crampin, E., Halstead, M., Klipp, E., et al. (2005) Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) Nat. Biotechnol, . 23, , in press
.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Alterovitz, T. Muso, and M. F. Ramoni The challenges of informatics in synthetic biology: from biomolecular networks to artificial organisms Brief Bioinform, November 11, 2009; (2009) bbp054v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. de Matos, R. Alcantara, A. Dekker, M. Ennis, J. Hastings, K. Haug, I. Spiteri, S. Turner, and C. Steinbeck Chemical Entities of Biological Interest: an update Nucleic Acids Res., October 23, 2009; (2009) gkp886v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. P. Smith, F. T. Bergmann, D. Chandran, and H. M. Sauro Antimony: a modular model definition language Bioinformatics, September 15, 2009; 25(18): 2452 - 2454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sutterlin, S. Huber, H. Dickhaus, and N. Grabe Modeling multi-cellular behavior in epidermal tissue homeostasis via finite state machines in multi-agent systems Bioinformatics, August 15, 2009; 25(16): 2057 - 2063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Endler, N. Rodriguez, N. Juty, V. Chelliah, C. Laibe, C. Li, and N. Le Novere Designing and encoding models for synthetic biology J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_4): S405 - S417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hold and S. Panke Towards the engineering of in vitro systems J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_4): S507 - S521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Matsuoka, S. Ghosh, and H. Kitano Consistent design schematics for biological systems: standardization of representation in biological engineering J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_4): S393 - S404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Le Fevre, S. Smidtas, C. Combe, M. Durot, F. d'Alche-Buc, and V. Schachter CycSim--an online tool for exploring and experimenting with genome-scale metabolic models Bioinformatics, August 1, 2009; 25(15): 1987 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kaleta, S. Richter, and P. Dittrich Using chemical organization theory for model checking Bioinformatics, August 1, 2009; 25(15): 1915 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Csikasz-Nagy Computational systems biology of the cell cycle Brief Bioinform, July 1, 2009; 10(4): 424 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mcwilliam, F. Valentin, M. Goujon, W. Li, M. Narayanasamy, J. Martin, T. Miyar, and R. Lopez Web services at the European Bioinformatics Institute-2009 Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W6 - W10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Drager, H. Planatscher, D. Motsou Wouamba, A. Schroder, M. Hucka, L. Endler, M. Golebiewski, W. Muller, and A. Zell SBML2LATEX: Conversion of SBML files into human-readable reports Bioinformatics, June 1, 2009; 25(11): 1455 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Hu, G. Matthew Fricke, J. R. Faeder, R. G. Posner, and W. S. Hlavacek GetBonNie for building, analyzing and sharing rule-based models Bioinformatics, June 1, 2009; 25(11): 1457 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H.G.M. van Beek, A.-C. Hauschild, H. Hettling, and T. W. Binsl Robust modelling, measurement and analysis of human and animal metabolic systems Phil Trans R Soc A, May 28, 2009; 367(1895): 1971 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Mallavarapu, M. Thomson, B. Ullian, and J. Gunawardena Programming with models: modularity and abstraction provide powerful capabilities for systems biology J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2009; 6(32): 257 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.-Y. Lee, R. Saha, F. N. K. Yusufi, W. Park, and I. A. Karimi Web-based applications for building, managing and analysing kinetic models of biological systems Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Kumar, B. C. Han, Z. Shi, J. Jia, Y. P. Wang, Y. T. Zhang, L. Liang, Q. F. Liu, Z. L. Ji, and Y. Z. Chen Update of KDBI: Kinetic Data of Bio-molecular Interaction database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(suppl_1): D636 - D641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Sahle, P. Mendes, S. Hoops, and U. Kummer A new strategy for assessing sensitivities in biochemical models Phil Trans R Soc A, October 13, 2008; 366(1880): 3619 - 3631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Lloyd, J. R. Lawson, P. J. Hunter, and P. F. Nielsen The CellML Model Repository Bioinformatics, September 15, 2008; 24(18): 2122 - 2123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Saez-Rodriguez, S. Gayer, M. Ginkel, and E. D. Gilles Automatic decomposition of kinetic models of signaling networks minimizing the retroactivity among modules Bioinformatics, August 15, 2008; 24(16): i213 - i219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Weidemann, S. Richter, M. Stein, S. Sahle, R. Gauges, R. Gabdoulline, I. Surovtsova, N. Semmelrock, B. Besson, I. Rojas, et al. SYCAMORE--a systems biology computational analysis and modeling research environment Bioinformatics, June 15, 2008; 24(12): 1463 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Grandison and R. J. Morris Biological pathway kinetic rate constants are scale-invariant Bioinformatics, March 15, 2008; 24(6): 741 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Alfieri, I. Merelli, E. Mosca, and L. Milanesi The cell cycle DB: a systems biology approach to cell cycle analysis Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D641 - D645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Wierling, R. Herwig, and H. Lehrach Resources, standards and tools for systems biology Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, October 17, 2007; (2007) elm027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Crasto, L. N. Marenco, N. Liu, T. M. Morse, K.-H. Cheung, P. C. Lai, G. Bahl, P. Masiar, H. Y.K. Lam, E. Lim, et al. SenseLab: new developments in disseminating neuroscience information Brief Bioinform, May 17, 2007; (2007) bbm018v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Gat-Viks and R. Shamir Refinement and expansion of signaling pathways: The osmotic response network in yeast Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 358 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.J Proctor, D.A Lydall, R.J Boys, C.S Gillespie, D.P Shanley, D.J Wilkinson, and T.B.L Kirkwood Modelling the checkpoint response to telomere uncapping in budding yeast J R Soc Interface, February 22, 2007; 4(12): 73 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Mak, M. Daly, B. Gruebel, and T. Ideker CellCircuits: a database of protein network models Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D538 - D545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Eccher and C. Priami Design and implementation of a tool for translating SBML into the biochemical stochastic {pi}-calculus Bioinformatics, December 15, 2006; 22(24): 3075 - 3081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Ng, B. Bursteinas, Q. Gao, E. Mollison, and M. Zvelebil Resources for integrative systems biology: from data through databases to networks and dynamic system models Brief Bioinform, December 1, 2006; 7(4): 318 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gilbert, H. Fuss, X. Gu, R. Orton, S. Robinson, V. Vyshemirsky, M. J. Kurth, C. S. Downes, and W. Dubitzky Computational methodologies for modelling, analysis and simulation of signalling networks Brief Bioinform, December 1, 2006; 7(4): 339 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. S. Hlavacek, J. R. Faeder, M. L. Blinov, R. G. Posner, M. Hucka, and W. Fontana Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems Sci. Signal., July 18, 2006; 2006(344): re6 - re6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Machne, A. Finney, S. Muller, J. Lu, S. Widder, and C. Flamm The SBML ODE Solver Library: a native API for symbolic and fast numerical analysis of reaction networks Bioinformatics, June 1, 2006; 22(11): 1406 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||