Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on February 6, 2007
Nucleic Acids Research 2007 35(5):1432-1440; doi:10.1093/nar/gkl1142
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (2024K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (326K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
35/5/1432    most recent
gkl1142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.-P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 5 1432-1440
© 2007 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Molecular Biology

Interplay between CRP-cAMP and PII-Ntr systems forms novel regulatory network between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli

Xian-Jun Mao1, Yi-Xin Huo1,3,4, Martin Buck2, Annie Kolb3 and Yi-Ping Wang1,*

1National Laboratory of Protein Engineering and Plant Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China, 2Department of Biological Science, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW72AZ, UK and 3Unité des Régulations Transcriptionnelles, URA-CNRS 2172, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +86 10 6275 8490; Fax: +86 10 6275 6325; Email: wangyp{at}pku.edu.cn

Received November 21, 2006. Revised December 13, 2006. Accepted December 14, 2006.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Escherichia coli, utilization of carbon sources is regulated by the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS), which modulates the intracellular levels of cAMP. The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) controls the transcription of many catabolic genes. The availability of nitrogen is sensed by the PII protein at the level of intracellular glutamine. Glutamine is transported mainly by GlnHPQ, and synthesized by glutamine synthetase (GS) encoded by glnA. Previous studies suggest that CRP affects nitrogen assimilation. Here we showed that at least two mechanisms are involved. First, CRP activates glnHp1 via synergistic binding with sigma 70 RNA polymerase (E{sigma}70) and represses glnHp2. As a consequence, in the presence of glutamine, the overall enhancement of glnHPQ expression alters GlnB signalling and de-activates glnAp2. Second, in vitro studies show that CRP can be recruited by sigma 54 holoenzyme (E{sigma}54) to a site centred at –51.5 upstream of glnAp2. CRP-induced DNA-bending prevents the nitrogen regulation protein C (NtrC) activator from approaching the activator-accessible face of the promoter-bound E{sigma}54 closed complex, and inhibits glnAp2. Therefore, as the major transcriptional effector of the ‘glucose effect’, CRP affects both the signal transduction pathway and the overall geometry of the transcriptional machinery of components of the nitrogen regulon.

In Escherichia coli and related bacteria, the presence of glucose in the growth medium prevents the utilization of other carbohydrates, the so-called classic ‘glucose effect’ (1). Preferential utilization of different carbon sources is regulated by the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) which modulates the intracellular levels of cAMP (2). cAMP levels are high when cells are grown on non-PTS carbon sources such as glycerol. When grown on carbohydrates such as glucose, cAMP levels are low (2,3). The activity of CRP can only be triggered by binding to cAMP (3), and therefore, in this article in order to simplify the text, the liganded CRP will be further designated as CRP, not CRP-cAMP. CRP contains three transcription activation regions and is considered as a proximal activator interacting over short distances with the major form of {sigma}70-RNA polymerase (E{sigma}70), often as the promoters of sugar catabolic genes. As a CRP point mutation defective in its activation region I (ARI), CRPH159L is unable to interact with the {alpha}CTD of E{sigma}70, but is still able to bind and bend DNA in a manner similar to its wild-type counterpart (4). Location of CRP-binding sites upstream of CRP-dependent promoters, their affinity for CRP and the intrinsic promoter strength determine the extent of activation (3). Detailed three-dimensional models of CRP–E{sigma}70–promoter complexes constructed by Lawson et al. (5) have yielded insights into how CRP binds DNA and activates transcription.

Assimilation of ammonia and acquisition of various nitrogen sources is tightly controlled in E. coli. A key operon, glnALG, encodes a key enzyme of nitrogen assimilation, glutamine synthetase (GS), and two regulatory proteins that control expression of the Ntr regulon, NtrB (also called NRII) and NtrC (also called NRI) (6). NtrC is phosphorylated by NtrB to form a hexamer (7,8) of NtrC-phosphate (NtrC-P) under nitrogen-deficient growth conditions. The expression of the glnALG operon is controlled by tandem promoters (glnAp1 and glnAp2). glnAp1, located at 115 bp upstream of glnAp2, is a {sigma}70-dependent weak promoter. Its transcription can be activated by CRP and blocked by NtrC-P (9). glnAp2 is transcribed by another form of RNA polymerase (E{sigma}54) and is activated by NtrC-P (6,10,11). Taken together, glnAp2 is responsible for increasing the levels of glnA transcription under nitrogen-deficient growth conditions (11).

Glutamine transport in E. coli has been shown to occur through a well-characterized high-affinity-binding-protein-dependent system (GlnHPQ) and poorly characterized low-affinity system(s). The glnHPQ operon is under the control of tandem promoters (glnHp1p2). glnHp1 is {sigma}70-dependent, while glnHp2 is {sigma}54- and NtrC-P-dependent (12,13).

The intracellular glutamine status is integrated and transduced by the PII signalling protein. Escherichia coli possesses two closely related PII paralogues, GlnB and GlnK. GlnB is produced constitutively, and it regulates the NtrB/NtrC two-component system (14,15). Its non-modified form can bind NtrB, which dephosphorylates the response regulator NtrC, thus switching off transcription of glnAp2 (16–18), and of other NtrC-dependent promoters including glnHp2 and the glnK promoter (19). Low intracellular glutamine levels, signalling nitrogen deficiency, leads to uridylylation of GlnB (20). The modified complex GlnB–UMP is not able to combine with NtrB. In this state, by phosphoryl transfer, NtrC is phosphorylated by NtrB and so activates transcription (17).

For glnAp2, NtrC-P binds to enhancer-like sequences centred at –108 and –140 and forms an oligomer (7) to activate transcription via direct interaction with promoter bound E{sigma}54. These NtrC-P binding sites are needed for activation at low intracellular NtrC-P concentration, while high concentrations of NtrC-P can stimulate transcription at glnAp2 without specific binding sites (6,21). In both cases, the NtrC-P must approach promoter bound E{sigma}54 from the opposite side of the DNA to which E{sigma}54 is bound (22).

Previously, we have shown that CRP down-regulates glnAp2 in E. coli (9). The latest studies suggest that this down-regulation may work through different mechanisms for different {sigma}54-dependent promoters. In the case of glnAp2, the effect of carbon source on NtrC-dependent gene expression can be mediated through CRP-dependent glutamine uptake, thereby affecting the glutamine-sensitive UTase–PII signalling system (16). However, the mechanisms behind the CRP-dependent glutamine uptake remain unknown.

In this study, we establish that CRP influences nitrogen regulation in E. coli by at least two mechanisms. First, with glutamine as the nitrogen source, glnHp1 is activated by CRP in vivo and in vitro. Through glnHPQ-dependent GlnB signalling, CRP acts to decrease the amount of the phosphorylated NtrC activator, which in turn causes a decrease in glnAp2 expression. Second, in vitro CRP is recruited to a sequence upstream of the core glnAp2 promoter through direct interaction between the ARI of CRP and the {alpha}CTD of E{sigma}54 resulting in a reduced activity of glnAp2. The latter direct down-regulatory effect is evident in vivo when a limiting amount of ammonium is used as the nitrogen source.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and plasmids
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The entire glnHPQ operon in TP2339-1 was replaced by bla gene using pKO3 system (24). This results in strain BD4000.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work

 
For construction of plasmid pKU550, the entire glnHp1p2 region together with the first 7 codons of the glnHPQ open reading frame (ORF) (from –289 to +63 of glnHp2) was amplified as a 364-bp DNA fragment by PCR using E. coli strain MG1655 chromosome DNA as template and 5'-CCCAAGCTTGCAGCCCACCTCAACGCAC-3' (p#1) and 5'-CGGGATCCACTTTTAATACAGACTTCATAG-3' (p#2) as primers. The 364-bp DNA fragment was digested with HindIII and BamHI, cloned into pUC18 and verified by DNA sequencing. The 364-bp HindIII–BamHI DNA fragment was cloned into pGD926, and the glnA ORF was fused in-frame with the eigth codon of the lacZ reporter gene. This results in plasmid pKU550.

The entire glnHPQ operon was amplified by PCR using p#1 and 5'-CCCAAGCTTAATAAGACACATTGCCTG-3' (p#3) as primers and E. coli strain MG1655 chromosome DNA as template. The PCR product was restricted with HindIII, cloned into pUC18 and verified by DNA sequencing. The HindIII DNA fragment was cloned into the glnAp2 reporter plasmid pKU101. This results in plasmid pKU101H, which complements strain BD4100 for glnHPQ.

A CRP consensus-binding site was introduced into position –50.5 nucleotides upstream of the glnAp2 by Takara Biotechnology (Dalian) and the promoter was designed as CC-50.5 according to the location of the centre of the CRP consensus-binding site (22).

Growth media and enzyme assays
M63 minimal medium was prepared as previously described (25) with glycerol (0.4% w/v) as the sole carbon source, and either glutamine (0.2% w/v) or 0.2 mM ammonium as nitrogen source, in the absence/presence of exogenous cAMP (2 mM), as indicated. Cells were grown at 30°C under aerobic conditions. The growth of the cells was measured spectrophotometrically by following the optical density of the culture (OD600). The cultures that were used for measurements were initiated by diluting a cell suspension from an overnight-grown culture in the appropriate medium to an initial OD600 of 0.04–0.05. When the day-culture reached an OD600 between 0.8 and 1.0, ß-galactosidase assays were performed as described before (25).

Primer extension and in vivo KMnO4 footprinting experiments
As described before (9), two primers (5'-CCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACG-3' (p#4) and 5'-CAACCGTTCCGCCAGTTTGCGT-3' (p#5)) hybridize with the structural gene of lacZ (p#4, for probing transcripts from glnHp1p2) and tetR (p#5, for the control) on pGD926-derived plasmids, respectively, in primer extension experiments.

Protein purification, in vitro transcription assays and DNase I footprinting
As described before (22).

Real time RT-PCR assays
Total RNA was isolated from 5 ml E. coli cells (TP2339-1 with pKU101 and pLG339CRP/pLG339CRPH159L) at OD600 0.8 using RNeasy® Mini Kit (QIAGEN). About 1.5 µg of total DNase I-treated RNA were reverse-transcribed using SuperScriptIITM RT (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A real-time PCR was performed with each pair of primers (5'-CGGATACCGCCTTCGTTC-3' (p#6) and 5'-ACCGCTCTTCACAGCAACC-3' (p#7) that were designed for quantifying transcripts from glnHp1p2; 5'-CCAGAATGGTGCATCTTCAGG-3' (p#8) and 5'-TCAGCTCTTTAGCGATGGCAG-3' (p#9) were designed for quantifying transcripts from glnHp1; 5'-ACGGCCCCAACAGTGAAGTA-3' (p#10) and 5'-ACGGTCTGACGACACGCAA-3' (p#11) were designed for quantifying transcripts of tetR from pKU101 as internal control) on a MJ OPTICON® 2 using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Data analyses for a relative quantification of gene expression were performed by the comparative Ct (threshold cycle) method according to the manufacturer's instructions. The parameter Ct is defined as the cycle number at which intensity of fluorescence (which is proportional to the quantity of DNA present in the tube during the exponential phase of the PCR) passes a fixed threshold value. The relative amount of target in two preparations is AE(Ct condition A internal control–Ct condition A sample)–(Ct condition B internal control–Ct condition B sample), where conditions A and B were in the presence/absence of exogenous cAMP (2 mM), respectively, sample is glnHp1 or glnHp1p2 product, internal control is tetR, AE = 1.8. Experiments were performed three times.

Determination of the modification status of GlnB
The modification status of GlnB was determined by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunodetection of GlnB using GlnB-specific antibodies as described before (26). The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of ice-cold buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.4; 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 1 mM benzamidin), added with glass beads (0.11 mm) to about the same volume as the cell pellet, and broken in a FastPrep (Thermo). Cell debris and glass beads were removed by centrifugation and the protein concentration in the supernatant was estimated as described before (27). A total of 2.5 µg protein was loaded per lane for non-denaturing PAGE. The proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C Extra, Amersham) and the blots were probed with specific anti-GlnB (provided by K. Forchhammer), which were subsequently visualized using peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega) and DAB (Pierce) diluted 1:10 in stable peroxide substrate buffer (Pierce) as substrate.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CRP activates the transcription of glnHp1 in vitro through its synergistic binding with E{sigma}70
Previous studies suggested that glutamine uptake is increased by the presence of CRP and increased extracellular glutamine elicits a nitrogen-excess signal (16). The glnHPQ operon encodes the high-affinity glutamine uptake system, and is under the control of {sigma} 70-dependent glnHp1 and {sigma}54- and NtrC-P-dependent glnHp2 (12,13). Under in vivo conditions, glnHp2 is repressed by CRP (Li et al., unpublished data, see also Figure 1). However, in a macroarray assay, we have found that the overall transcription of glnHPQ is activated by the presence of exogenous cAMP (2 mM, data not shown). Therefore whether glnHp1 transcription and the overall transcription of the glnHPQ operon are activated by CRP in ARI-dependent manner was studied.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. Effect of CRP and its ARI mutant CRPH159L on the glnHp1p2 expression in the E. coli cya crp double mutant TP2339-1 detected by primer extension analysis. Lane 5 is G marker ladder. Cells were grown in M63 minimal medium with glycerol (0.4% w/v) as the sole carbon source, and glutamine (0.2% w/v) as nitrogen source, in the absence/presence of exogenous cAMP (2 mM).

 
Sequence analysis indicates that no obvious CRP-binding site can be found upstream of glnHp1, and DNA fragment containing glnHp1 cannot be retarded by CRP alone in gel shift assays (data not shown). In order to investigate the biochemical behaviour of CRP and E{sigma}70 on glnHp1, DNase I footprinting assays were carried out in vitro. The results show that in the absence of E{sigma}70, CRP cannot occupy the upstream regulatory sequences of glnHp1 even at high concentrations (lanes 1–5 of Figure 2A). Also, in the absence of CRP, only weak occupancy of E{sigma}70 at the core promoter of glnHp1 is evident (lanes 6 and 10 of Figure 2A; lanes 2 and 9 of Figure 2B). In contrast, when wild-type CRP is present together with E{sigma}70, the binding of E{sigma}70 is strongly increased (Figure 2A and B). Also, wild-type CRP is recruited by E{sigma}70 to a site centred at –61.5, organized as Class I {sigma}70-promoters (28). Moreover, the above synergistic binding is abolished when wild-type CRP is replaced by its ARI mutant CRPH159L (Figure 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. DNase I footprints of E{sigma}70 in the presence or absence of CRP and CRPH159L on glnHp1 (non template strand). (A) Titration with increasing concentrations of CRP (lanes 2 and 7, 30 nM; lanes 3 and 8, 100 nM; lanes 4 and 9, 300 nM) were performed in the absence (2–4) or presence of 50 nM E{sigma}70 (lanes 7–9). Lane 11 is A + G marker ladder. The protected regions were monitored by adding increasing concentrations of CRP in the presence or absence of E{sigma}70. (B) Titration with increasing concentrations of CRP (lane 3, 33 nM; lane 4, 100 nM; lane 5, 300 nM) and CRPH159L (lane 10, 33 nM; lane 11, 100 nM; lane 12, 300 nM) were performed in the presence of 25 nM E{sigma}70 (lanes 3–5 and 10–12). Lane 7 is A + G marker ladder. The limits of protected regions are indicated. Note that wild-type CRP is recruited to a site centred at –61.5 by E{sigma}70-RNA polymerase, which suggests a higher affinity for DNA binding of E{sigma}70 than that of CRP.

 
In order to investigate whether CRP can activate the transcription of glnHp1 in an ARI-dependent manner in vitro, run-off and multiple-round transcriptional assays were carried out with different concentrations of CRP or its ARI mutant CRPH159L. Results showed that, regardless of the concentration of E{sigma}70, wild-type CRP, but not its ARI mutant CRPH159L, can activate glnHp1 by a factor up to 6- and 14-fold in single- and multiple-round transcriptional assays, respectively. The activation factor increased when the concentration of CRP was increased (Figure 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. Effect of CRP and its ARI mutant CRPH159L on the glnHp1 expression in vitro. (A) multiple-round run-off assay; (B) single-round run-off assay.

 
Taken together, we have identified a naturally occurring case, where E{sigma}70 RNA polymerase binds very weakly to glnHp1. Binding of E{sigma}70 to glnHp1 recruits CRP to a degenerate site at –61.5 (‘ttgTATCCacatcaTCACAcaa’, which has a score of 1.44 bits, according to methods described before ((29), in which 17 bits was used as the cutoff score for strong CRP-binding sites; and 10 bits as the cutoff score for weak CRP-binding sites)), and the synergistic binding between CRP and E{sigma}70 clearly helps both partners in a reciprocal manner, which results in transcriptional activation of glnHp1.

The overall transcription of the glnHPQ operon is activated by CRP in vivo
To investigate the effect of CRP on the expression of glnHPQ in vivo, pKU550 carrying glnHp1p2 fused with the lacZ reporter gene was transformed into cya crp double mutant TP2339-1 containing either pLG339CRP or pLG339CRPH159L. The cells were grown in M63 medium in the absence or presence of exogenous cAMP. The results showed that in the presence of exogenous cAMP, glnHp1p2 can be activated 3-fold by wild-type CRP. This activation was abolished when ARI mutant CRPH159L replaced wild-type CRP (Table 2a).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Effect of CRP and its ARI mutant CRPH159L on the expression of glnHp1p2 and glnAp2 in the E. coli cya crp double mutant TP2339-1 and cya crp glnHPQ triple mutant BD4000

 
In order to verify the CRP effect on glnHp1 and glnHp2 respectively, two parallel experiments were carried out. First, in vivo primer extension assays were carried out on both promoters from plasmid pKU550 (Figure 1). Second, a more quantifiable real time RT-PCR was carried out to verify the CRP effect on both glnHp1 and glnHp1p2 transcribed directly from chromosome (Table 2d). In both cases, the results showed that wild-type CRP activates glnHp1, but represses glnHp2. In contrast, CRPH159L does not affect the expression of glnHp1 or glnHp2. Quantitatively, the results obtained from real time RT-PCR correlate well with the results obtained from ß-galactosidase assays (compare Table 2d with 2a). Therefore, it seems that the CRP effect on glnHp1p2 is somewhat similar to that obtained with glnAp1p2, where CRP also activates {sigma}70-dependent glnAp1, and represses {sigma}54-dependent glnAp2 (9). However, they are different in at least two ways. First, the overall output is different. In this case, CRP causes a 3–4-fold decrease of overall expression for glnA (9), but a 3-fold increase for glnH (Table 2a and d). Second, it is known that a classical CRP-binding site is located upstream of the glnAp1 promoter (10,30), essential for CRP-dependent activation of glnAp1 (9). In contrast, no obvious CRP-binding site can be found upstream of glnHp1. CRP activates the transcription of glnHp1 in vitro through its synergistic binding with E{sigma}70 (Figure 2).

The CRP effect is maximized through glnHPQ-mediated glutamine uptake
The above results, together with the results obtained from Maheswaran and Forchhammer (16), suggest that CRP increases expression of the glnHPQ operon, which in turn, increases glutamine uptake. It has been proposed that, as a consequence, the intracellular glutamine level is increased, and so elicits a nitrogen-excess signal. In this case, the GlnB signalling process leads to the dephosphorylation of NtrC, and subsequent de-activation of NtrC-P-dependent promoters such as glnAp2 and glnHp2 (16,31).

To further investigate the above proposal, the glnHPQ operon was deleted from cya and crp double mutant TP2339-1 to give a triple mutant strain designated BD4000. The expression of glnAp2 (pKU101) was measured in the carbon poor medium in the presence of glutamine, in the presence/absence of cAMP. The results showed that the repression effect of wild-type CRP on the expression of glnAp2 is reduced from 30-fold to 2-fold upon deletion of glnHPQ. As control, the ARI mutant CRPH159L has no such repression effect (Table 2b). The glnHPQ mutant could still grow in the carbon-poor medium in the presence of glutamine, where glutamine uptake might be carried out by the low-affinity systems (32) (also see Figure 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. Effect of CRP and its ARI mutant CRPH159L on the uridylylation status of GlnB in the E. coli cya crp double mutant TP2339-1 and cya crp glnHPQ triple mutant BD4000. All strains (lanes 1–8) were grown in M63 minimal medium with glycerol (0.4% w/v) as the sole carbon source, and glutamine (0.2% w/v) as nitrogen source, in the absence/presence of exogenous cAMP (2 mM). TP2339-1 was grown in nitrogen-sufficient medium with 40 mM ammonium as control (lane 9).

 
To complement BD4000 for the glnHPQ operon, and minimize the artificial effects from genetic manipulation, a new glnAp2 reporter low copy number plasmid carrying the entire glnHPQ operon was constructed (designed as pKU101H), and used for the following assays. In this case, the CRP/cAMP effect on the expression of glnAp2 was investigated. Results indicated that when BD4000 was complemented by pKU101H, the CRP-mediated repression effect could be restored from 2-fold to 50-fold by wild-type CRP, while its ARI mutant CRPH159L had no such effect (Table 2b). We also noticed that such restoration could only be observed when cells grown in M63-minimum medium supplemented with glutamine, but not with ammonium, as the sole nitrogen source, indicating that the restoration effect requires physical transport of glutamine into the cells, rather than the sole enhancement of glnHPQ expression (Table 2c).

Maheswaran and Forchhammer (16) showed that deuridylylation of GlnB is a direct consequence of glutamine addition to cAMP-treated cells, which agrees with their proposal that cAMP increases the intracellular glutamine level when glutamine is used as the sole nitrogen source. In this study, similar assays were done with both TP2339-1 and BD4000 strains (Figure 4). The cells were grown in the presence of glutamine as the sole nitrogen source except the control (lane 9). As shown in the figure, in the absence of wild-type CRP (lanes 1, 3 and 4) or in the absence of GlnHPQ (lanes 5–8), GlnB is in its highly uridylylated state. By contrast, more than 80% of GlnB is in its deuridylylated state in the presence of both wild-type CRP and GlnHPQ (lane 2). As control, we showed that GlnB is mostly deuridylylated in the presence of 40 mM ammonium (lane 9). Taken together, the above results show that the GlnHPQ-mediated GlnB signalling is regulated by CRP. The intracellular concentration of glutamine is increased to a nitrogen-excess level by the GlnHPQ transport system in the presence of CRP and GlnB is deuridylylated in this case. As a consequence, NtrC is dephosphorylated and the expression of glnAp2 is decreased in the presence of CRP.

It is interesting to note that when the glnHPQ operon is deleted, the carbon source/cAMP effect remains, although it is reduced dramatically (Table 2b). This result indicates that there is another repression mechanism, which might not be related to the glutamine uptake. To further investigate this possibility, ammonium was used to replace the glutamine as the sole nitrogen source. Results showed that wild-type CRP, but not its ARI mutant CRPH159L, still represses glnAp2 by a factor of 2-fold in both TP2339-1 and BD4000 (Table 2c). This result supports the notion that alternative mechanism(s) may exist for CRP-mediated repression on glnAp2.

CRP repressed the expression of glnAp2 directly in vitro
To investigate whether CRP can repress glnAp2 directly, multiple-round transcriptional assays were carried out with different concentrations of CRP or its ARI mutant CRPH159L. Results showed that wild-type CRP can repress the transcriptional activity of glnAp2 by a factor of 2-fold. Moreover, when wild-type CRP was replaced by its ARI mutant CRPH159L, the repression effect was abolished (Figure 5). Also, this repression effect can be increased to 10-fold, when NtrCS160F (a constitutive active form of NtrC with a lower activity compared to NtrC-P) was used to replace wild-type NtrC-P (Figure 5), indicating that repression would be greater when a partially active form of NtrC exists in the cell (33).


Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. Effect of CRP and its ARI mutant CRPH159L on the glnAp2 expression in vitro. Wild-type CRP and NtrCS160F ({blacktriangleup}) CRP and NtrC-P ({blacksquare}), and CRPH159L and NtrC-P ({diamondsuit}), were used in the multiple-round transcriptional assays. The activity of glnAp2 with E{sigma}54+NtrC-P/NtrCS160F in the absence of CRP or CRPH159L was taken as 100%.

 
To investigate the mechanism of the ARI-dependent repression effect on glnAp2, DNase I footprinting assays were carried out in vitro. In the absence of E{sigma}54, CRP or its ARI mutant CRPH159L cannot occupy the upstream sequence of glnAp2 (lanes 9 and 10 of Figure 6). On the other hand, in the absence of CRP, full occupancy of E{sigma}54 on the core promoter of glnAp2 was observed (lane 13 of Figure 6). When CRP is present together with E{sigma}54, two additional protection regions were observed upstream of the binding site of E{sigma}54. In contrast, when ARI mutant CRPH159L was used in the assay, these additional protections were not evident (compare lanes 11 and 12 of Figure 6).


Figure 6
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 6. DNase I footprints of E{sigma}54 in the presence or absence of CRP and CRPH159L on CC-50.5 (A CRP consensus-binding site was introduced into position –50.5 nucleotides upstream of the glnAp2) or wild-type glnAp2. CRP, CRPH159L and E{sigma}54, when added, were present at a final concentration of 50 nM. Lanes 1 and 8 are A+G marker ladders. The limits of protected regions are indicated. On glnAp2, only wild-type CRP can bind co-operatively with E{sigma}54 and the protection region is comparable to the one on CC-50.5. The locations of specific protected or hypersensitive bands are different on the two templates due to the difference of the sequence of CRP-binding sites. The hypersensitive band due to the CRP-binding on glnAp2 is marked by arrow. The protection of {alpha}CTD binding, which is co-operative only with wild-type CRP, is similar on both glnAp2 and CC-50.5 (lanes 5 and 12). These results strongly support that the relative orientation between CRP and E{sigma}54 is similar on glnAp2 and CC-50.5.

 
The two additional protection regions are from –42 to –61 and from –63 to –71. According to the location and size of the protected regions, it is possible that CRP binds and bends DNA from –42 to –61 and {alpha}CTD of E{sigma}54 binds DNA upstream. The binding and bending centre for CRP is at –51.5. Previous research by Huo et al. (22) had shown that when CRP was located at –50.5 on glnAp2, CRP and E{sigma}54 lie on the same face of DNA helix. Presumably the DNA bending induced by CRP, places NtrC-P far from the activator-accessible face of the closed complex and in turn represses the expression of glnAp2. The contact between {alpha}CTD and the upstream DNA region supports the view that DNA bending exists. Taken together, CRP was recruited by E{sigma}54 in an ARI-dependent manner and repressed NtrC-P mediated activation of glnAp2 directly.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have shown that there are two novel mechanisms for CRP to mediate nitrogen regulation. In one mechanism CRP can affect the PII-mediated signal transduction pathway, hence causing deactivation of {sigma}54-dependent gln promoters (for instance, glnAp2). Specifically, in vitro experiments show that glnHp1 promoter is a Class I-like CRP-dependent promoter. Through ARI–{alpha}CTD interaction, CRP and E{sigma}70 bind synergistically to glnHp1 to form the closed complex (Figure 2). The synergy between CRP and E{sigma}70 activates glnHp1 (Table 2d). Despite glnHp2 repression (Figure 1), the overall enhanced glnHPQ expression (~3-fold, see Table 2a and d) leads to increased glutamine uptake, leading to PII-UMP deuridylylation (Figure 4) and shuts down the Ntr response in consequence. The other mechanism is that CRP can change the topological arrangement of E{sigma}54, NtrC-phosphate and glnAp2 promoter, thus directly repressing the glnAp2 promoter (Figure 5). Specifically, CRP can be recruited to the glnAp2 promoter at position –51.5 through ARI–{alpha}CTD interactions. This recruitment leads to DNA bending by CRP at –51.5, and hence inhibits the glnAp2 promoter activity (Figure 6). Taken together, our study reveals the mechanisms of CRP-mediated nitrogen regulation and presents two novel regulatory linkages between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in E. coli. The signal transduction pathway shown in our study illuminates the regulatory link between PII and carbon regulation (31). Although glutamine can be used as a sole carbon source supporting slow growth (34), it is surprising to find that the transport of glutamine is controlled by both global-carbon and global-nitrogen signal transduction pathways.

The dynamic range of expression of glnHPQ from the ‘off’ state to the ‘on’ state is greater when it has one {sigma}54-dependent promoter and one {sigma}70 promoter. The {sigma}54-dependent promoter may be able to give higher levels of transcription than the {sigma}70-dependent one could, but still is repressible by carbon status through action of CRP. In the presence of glutamine, the product of these two tandem promoters provides a novel feed-back to the glnAp2 expression, through PII-NtrBC in the genetic cascade controlling nitrogen assimilation, other than GlnK-AmtB (35). The complicated regulatory mechanisms described above are involved in a related physiological pathway. To manage the nitrogen deficiency, E. coli uses NtrC/Nac system to scavenge for nitrogen-containing compounds as a first line of defense against nitrogen starvation (36). To manage the carbon deficiency, E. coli uses CRP to activate various carbon source transporter systems (37–39) (You et al. unpublished data). Results obtained from this study indicate that CRP also accelerates transport of glutamine, even in the absence of glutamine in the medium, and represses the synthesis of glutamine to efficiently balance the carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation. When the relevant key signals in the promoter sequences are searched for in silico, the CRP inhibitory effect on glutamine biosynthesis appears to be also encountered in other enterobacteria (such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella flexneri, Enterobacter gergoviae, Erwinia carotovora and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium), although the details of the regulation might differ. Interestingly in S. typhimurium, a bona fide CRP-binding site (‘caaTGTGAaagttgGCACAgat’, which has a score of 10.99 bits, according to methods described before (29)) is found centred at –27.5 upstream of glnAp2. This suggests that competition may occur between CRP and E{sigma}54 for binding to the promoter region. As there is no Nac protein found yet in S. typhimurium (40), it would be interesting to know if a tighter regulatory linkage exists.

As a global regulator, CRP is estimated to interact at {approx}200 regulatory regions in E. coli. Zheng et al. (41) had revealed 152 hitherto unknown CRP regulons involved in energy production, amino acid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism and ion transport systems by run-off transcription/microarray analysis (ROMA). Moreover, Grainger et al. (42) had shown that CRP also interacts with thousands of weaker sites across the whole E. coli chromosome other than CRP-binding sites at known CRP regulated promoters by chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-density microarrays (ChIP-chip). We demonstrate that, physiologically, CRP tends to use weak affinity DNA-binding sites for transcriptional activation or repression by a regulated recruitment mechanism (43). It would be interesting to see if cross-talk between carbon metabolism and the other major areas of metabolism are mediated through mechanisms similar to those identified in our studies.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are grateful to S. Wigneshweraraj for NtrC, {sigma}54, and K. Forchhammer for GlnB-specific antibodies. We thank C.H. You and B.Y. Nan for the E. coli macroarray assays, Y.T. Zhang for the help of real time RT-PCR assays, Z.X. Tian for bioinformatics analysis in other enterobacteria. This research was supported by the 973 National Key Basic Research Program on Nitrogen Fixation in China (No. 2001CB108900 to Y.P.W. as Chief Scientist of the program), the NSFC (No. 30470940, and Outstanding Young Scholar Award (No. 39925017) to Y.P.W.) and the Programe of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities, No. B06001. [GenBank] The stay of Y.X.H. in France was supported by the Ministère des Affaires Etrangères. Open Access publication charges for this paper were waivered by Oxford Journals.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


   Footnotes
 
4Present address: Yi-Xin Huo, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and The Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, P.O. Box 951569, 90095, USA Back

The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two should be regarded as joint First Authors.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Monod, J. (1942) Recherches sur la croissance des cellules bactériennes Ph.D. thesis, Hermann Paris Actualités scientifiques etindustrielles .

  2. Saier, MH, Ramseier, TM, Reizer, J. (1996) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, Biology, 2nd edn In Neidhardt, FC, Curtiss, R, III, Ingraham, JL, Lin, ECC, Low, KB, Magasanik, B, Reznikoff, WS, Riley, M, Schaechter, M, Umbarger, HE (Eds.). Am. Soc. Microbiol, Washington, DC Vol. 1, pp. 1325–1343 .

  3. Kolb, A, Busby, S, Buc, H, Garges, S, Adhya, S. (1993) Transcriptional regulation by cAMP and its receptor protein Annu. Rev. Biochem, 62, 749–795[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  4. Zhou, Y, Zhang, X, Ebright, RH. (1993) Identification of the activating region of catabolite gene activator protein (CAP): isolation and characterization of mutants of CAP specifically defective in transcription activation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 90, 6081–6085[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  5. Lawson, CL, Swigon, D, Murakami, KS, Darst, SA, Berman, HM, Ebright, RH. (2004) Catabolite activator protein: DNA binding and transcription activation Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 14, 10–20[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  6. Reitzer, LJ and Magasanik, B. (1986) Transcription of glnA in E. coli is stimulated by activator bound to sites far from the promoter Cell, 45, 785–792[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  7. Wyman, C, Rombel, I, North, AK, Bustamante, C, Kustu, S. (1997) Unusual oligomerization required for activity of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein Science, 275, 1658–1661[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  8. De Carlo, S, Chen, B, Kondrashkina, E, Hoover, TR, Nogales, E, Nixon, BT. (2006) The structural basis for regulated assembly of the transcriptional activator NtrC Genes Dev, 20, 1485–1495[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  9. Tian, ZX, Li, QS, Buck, M, Kolb, A, Wang, YP. (2001) The CRP-cAMP complex and downregulation of the glnAp2 promoter provides a novel regulatory linkage between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli Mol. Microbiol, 41, 911–924[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  10. Reitzer, LJ and Magasanik, B. (1985) Expression of glnA in Escherichia coli is regulated at tandem promoters Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 82, 1979–1983[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  11. Magasanik, B. (1996) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd edn In Neidhardt, FC, Curtiss, R, III, Ingraham, JL, Lin, ECC, Low, KB, Magasanik, B, Reznikoff, WS, Riley, M, Schaechter, M, Umbarger, HE (Eds.). Am. Soc. Microbiol, Washington, DC Vol. 1, pp. 1344–1356 .

  12. Willis, RC, Iwata, KK, Furlong, CE. (1975) Regulation of glutamine transport in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol, 122, 1032–1037[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  13. Claverie-Martin, F and Magasanik, B. (1991) Role of the integration host factor in the regulation of the glnHp2 promoter of Escherichia coli Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 88, 1631–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  14. Ninfa, AJ and Atkinson, MR. (2000) PII signal transduction proteins Trends Microbiol, 8, 172–179[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  15. Ninfa, AJ and Jiang, P. (2005) PII signal transduction proteins: sensors of alpha-ketoglutarate that regulate nitrogen metabolism Curr. Opin. Microbiol, 8, 168–173[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  16. Maheswaran, M and Forchhammer, K. (2003) Carbon-source-dependent nitrogen regulation in Escherichia coli is mediated through glutamine-dependent GlnB signalling Microbiology, 149, 2163–2172[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  17. Jiang, P and Ninfa, AJ. (1999) Regulation of autophosphorylation of Escherichia coli nitrogen regulator II by the PII signal transduction protein J. Bacteriol, 181, 1906–1911[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  18. Pioszak, AA, Jiang, P, Ninfa, AJ. (2000) The Escherichia coli PII signal transduction protein regulates the activities of the two-component system transmitter protein NRII by direct interaction with the kinase domain of the transmitter module Biochemistry, 39, 13450–13461[CrossRef][Medline] .

  19. Atkinson, MR, Blauwkamp, TA, Bondarenko, V, Studitsky, V, Ninfa, AJ. (2002) Activation of the glnA, glnK, and nac promoters as Escherichia coli undergoes the transition from nitrogen excess growth to nitrogen starvation J. Bacteriol, 184, 5358–5363[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  20. Jiang, P, Peliska, JA, Ninfa, AJ. (1998) Enzymological characterization of the signal-transducing uridylyltransferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (EC 2.7.7.59) of Escherichia coli and its interaction with the PII protein Biochemistry, 37, 12782–12794[CrossRef][Medline] .

  21. Schneider, BL, Shiau, S-P, Reitzer, LJ. (1991) Role of multiple environmental stimuli in control of transcription from nitrogen-regulated promoter in Escherichia coli with weak or no activator-binding sites J. Bacteriol, 173, 6355–6363[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  22. Huo, YX, Tian, ZX, Rappas, M, Wen, J, Chen, YC, You, CH, Zhang, X, Buck, M, Wang, YP, et al. (2006) Protein-induced DNA bending clarifies the architectural organization of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter Mol. Microbiol, 59, 168–180[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  23. Bell, A, Gaston, K, Williams, R, Chapman, K, Kolb, A, Buc, H, Minchin, S, Williams, J, Busby, S. (1990) Mutations that alter the ability of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein to activate transcription Nucleic Acids Res, 18, 7243–7250[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  24. Link, AJ, Philips, D, Church, GM. (1997) Methods for generating precise deletions and insertions in the genome of wild-type Escherichia coli: application to open reading frame characterization J. Bacteriol, 179, 6228–6237[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  25. Miller, JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics, (1972) New York Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press .

  26. Forchhammer, K, Hedler, A, Strobel, H, Weiss, V. (1999) Heterotrimerization of PII-like signalling proteins: implications for PII-mediated signal transduction systems Mol. Microbiol, 33, 338–349[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  27. Bradford, MM. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding Anal. Biochem, 72, 248–254[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  28. Busby, S and Ebright, RH. (1999) Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP) J. Mol. Biol, 293, 199–213[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  29. Tan, K, Moreno-Hagelsieb, G, Collado-Vides, J, Stormo, GD. (2001) A comparative genomics approach to prediction of new members of regulons Genome Res, 11, 566–584[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  30. MacNeil, T, MacNeil, D, Tyler, B. (1982) Fine-structure deletion map and complementation analysis of the glnA-glnL-glnG region in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol, 150, 1302–1313[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  31. Commichau, FM, Forchhammer, K, Stulke, J. (2006) Regulatory links between carbon and nitrogen metabolism Curr. Opin. Microbiol, 9, 167–172[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  32. Reizer, LJ. (1996) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2nd edn In Neidhardt, FC, Curtiss, R, III, Ingraham, JL, Lin, ECC, Low, KB, Magasanik, B, Reznikoff, WS, Riley, M, Schaechter, M, Umbarger, HE (Eds.). Am. Soc. Microbiol, Washington, DC Vol. 1, pp. 380–390 .

  33. Rombel, I, North, A, Hwang, I, Wyman, C, Kustu, S. (1998) The bacterial enhancer-binding NtrC as a molecular machine Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol, 63, 157–166[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  34. Mcfall, E and Newman, EB. (1996) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2nd edn In Neidhardt, FC, Curtiss, R, III, Ingraham, JL, Lin, ECC, Low, KB, Magasanik, B, Reznikoff, WS, Riley, M, Schaechter, M, Umbarger, HE (Eds.). Am. Soc. Microbiol, Washington, DC Vol. 1, pp. 358–379 .

  35. Javelle, A and Merrick, M. (2005) Complex formation between AmtB and GlnK: an ancestral role in prokaryotic nitrogen control Biochem. Soc. Trans, 33, 170–172[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  36. Zimmer, DP, Soupene, E, Lee, HL, Wendisch, VF, Khodursky, AB, Peter, BJ, Bender, RA, Kustu, S. (2000) Nitrogen regulatory protein C-controlled genes of Escherichia coli: scavenging as a defense against nitrogen limitation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 97, 14674–14679[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  37. Ferenci, T. (1996) Adaptation to life at micromolar nutrient levels: the regulation of Escherichia coli glucose transport by endoinduction and cAMP FEMS Microbiol. Rev, 18, 301–317[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] .

  38. Hua, Q, Yang, C, Oshima, T, Mori, H, Shimizu, K. (2004) Analysis of gene expression in Escherichia coli in response to changes of growth-limiting nutrient in chemostat cultures Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 70, 2354–2366[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  39. Lendenmann, U and Egli, T. (1995) Is Escherichia coli growing in glucose-limited chemostat culture able to utilize other sugars without lag Microbiology, 141, 71–78[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  40. Muse, WB and Bender, RA. (1998) The nac (nitrogen assimilation control) gene from Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol, 180, 1166–1173[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  41. Zheng, DL, Constantinidou, C, Hobman, JL, Minchin, SD. (2004) Identification of the CRP regulon using in vitro and in vivo transcriptional profiling Nucleic Acids Res, 32, 5874–5893[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  42. Grainger, DC, Hurd, D, Harrison, M, Holdstock, J, Busby, SJ. (2005) Studies of the distribution of Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 102, 17693–17698[Abstract/Free Full Text] .

  43. Ptashne, M and Gann, A. (1997) Transcriptional activation by recruitment Nature, 386, 569–577[CrossRef][Medline] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
N. De Lay and S. Gottesman
The Crp-Activated Small Noncoding Regulatory RNA CyaR (RyeE) Links Nutritional Status to Group Behavior
J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2009; 191(2): 461 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
X.-X. Zhang and P. B. Rainey
Dual Involvement of CbrAB and NtrBC in the Regulation of Histidine Utilization in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 185 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (2024K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (326K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
35/5/1432    most recent
gkl1142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.-P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?