Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2008
Nucleic Acids Research 2008 36(11):e67; doi:10.1093/nar/gkn298
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (7643K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (693K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/11/e67    most recent
gkn298v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 11 e67
© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Methods Online

Regulated gene insertion by steroid-induced {Phi}C31 integrase

Nynne Sharma, Brian Moldt, Trine Dalsgaard, Thomas G. Jensen and Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen*

Department of Human Genetics, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +45 89421651; Fax: +45 86123173; Email: giehm{at}humgen.au.dk

Received March 4, 2008. Revised April 4, 2008. Accepted April 29, 2008.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Nonviral integration systems are widely used genetic tools in transgenesis and play increasingly important roles in strategies for therapeutic gene transfer. Methods to efficiently regulate the activity of transposases and site-specific recombinases have important implications for their spatiotemporal regulation in live transgenic animals as well as for studies of their applicability as safe vectors for genetic therapy. In this report, strategies for posttranslational induction of a variety of gene-inserting proteins are investigated. An engineered hormone-binding domain, derived from the human progesterone receptor, hPR891, and specifically recognized by the synthetic steroid mifepristone, is fused to the Sleeping Beauty, Frog Prince, piggyBac and Tol2 transposases as well as to the Flp and {Phi}C31 recombinases. By analyzing mifepristone-directed inducibility of gene insertion in cultured human cells, efficient posttranslational regulation of the Flp recombinase and the {Phi}C31 integrase is documented. In addition, fusion of the {Phi}C31 integrase with the ERT2 modified estrogen receptor hormone-binding domain results in a protein, which is inducible by a factor of 22-fold and retains 75% of the activity of the wild-type protein. These inducible {Phi}C31 integrase systems are important new tools in transgenesis and in safety studies of the {Phi}C31 integrase for gene therapy applications.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Nonviral integration systems, including DNA transposons and site-specific recombinases (SSRs), are widely used genetic tools for genome mutagenesis and transgenesis (1–3). Desirable properties such as simple and inexpensive production, together with the lack of induction of immunological responses and improved safety, have made nonviral integration systems become widespread alternatives to viral integration systems for therapeutic gene transfer applications (4,5).

DNA transposons are mobile DNA elements that can move from one genetic location to another through a cut and paste mechanism. Transposon-based vector systems consists of a donor plasmid harboring the transgene of interest placed between terminal inverted repeats (IRs) of the transposon and a helper plasmid carrying the transposase-coding sequence under the control of a promoter. Codelivery of donor and helper plasmids will facilitate integration of the transgene into the genome of cells (6). Sleeping Beauty (SB) and Frog prince (FP), members of the Tc1/mariner family of transposable elements, were constructed from inactive transposon elements residing in the genomes of salmonid fish and the Northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens), respectively (7,8) and both transpose efficiently in vertebrate cells. Recently, two natural transposable elements, piggyBac (PB) isolated from the genome of the cabbage looper moth Trichoplusia ni, and Tol2, a hAT-like transposable element isolated from the genome of the Japanese medaka fish Oryzias latipes, have shown to have activity in mammalian cells (9–14). PB has been used previously for genetic analysis in a wide variety of insects (11), whereas Tol2 has been used mainly for germline transgenesis in zebrafish (13).

SSRs can induce deletion, insertion or inversion of DNA sequences by breaking and joining DNA molecules at specific sites (1). The tyrosine recombinase Flp, originating from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mediates recombination between two 34 bp homotypic Flp recombination target (FRT) sequences. Flp has, along with its family member the Cre recombinase, been used in numerous gene modification studies in mammalian animals and cells (15–17). Another SSR, the serine recombinase {Phi}C31 integrase, encoded by a phage of Streptomyces lividans (18), recognizes the 34- and 39-heterotypic sequences attB and attP. Recombination results in generation of two hybrid sites, attL and attR, and the reaction is therefore unidirectional (19). The {Phi}C31 integrase mediates site-specific integration of a plasmid containing an attB sequence into specific chromosomal sequences, called pseudo attP sites, in human and mouse cells (20). The total number of pseudo attP sites present in the mammalian genome is estimated to be in the range of 100–1000 sites, and the ability of the {Phi}C31 integrase to integrate DNA into such sites in unmodified mammalian genomes has made this recombinase system become a promising vector system for somatic gene therapy approaches (21,22).

Among several attempts to further improve nonviral integration systems, mutational analysis of the SB transposase and the Flp recombinase have given rise to several hyperactive mutants with increased activity in vertebrate cells (23–26), whereas a {Phi}C31 integrase with increased specificity for a single pseudo attP site has been created by DNA shuffling (27). In addition, SB transposase fusion variants with altered functional properties have been generated recently in attempts to increase the site-specificity of the integration systems (28,29). Alternative ways to improve these systems further include development of strategies for inducible recombination and gene insertion. Regulation at the level of expression by using inducible promoters is an obvious possibility, although this approach is often hampered by leaky expression. Regulation of the activity at the posttranslational level will allow temporal control of the transposition or recombination reaction, and this will be an advantage in studies where transposition or recombination is required at a certain point or within a certain time span. Inducible recombinase systems have previously been developed by fusion of the recombinase to the regulatory domain of a steroid receptor (30,31). Cre and Flp recombinases fused to the modified estrogen receptor hormone-binding domain, ERT2, demonstrated hormone-dependent recombination with high activity in the presence of the receptor ligand, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and low activity when 4-OHT was absent (32,33). By using mice transgenic for the Cre-ERT2 gene driven by tissue-specific promoters, tamoxifen-induced spatiotemporally regulated transgene expression has been reported in a range of cell types, including adipocytes (34), melanocytes (35), gut epithelial cells (36), hepatocytes (37), astroglial cells (38,39) and nociceptive neurons of dorsal root ganglia (40). An inducible Cre recombinase has also been obtained by fusion to the hormone-binding domain of the mutant human progesterone receptor hPR891 (41). The hPR891 contains a 42 amino acid C-terminal deletion, which makes the receptor bind specifically to the synthetic steroid mifepristone (RU486) and not to progesterone or other endogenous hormones (42). Mifepristone-regulated activity of this fusion has been utilized for spatiotemporal control of gene expression in brain (43) and skin (44).

In this study, we used the hormone-binding domain (here referred to as ‘MiBD’ for ‘Mifepristone-binding domain’) of hPR891 to generate fusion proteins with the SB, FP, PB and Tol2 transposases and the Flp and {Phi}C31 recombinases in an attempt to develop inducible nonviral integration systems. We demonstrate that engineered high-efficiency fusion variants of the Flp and {Phi}C31 recombinases mediate site-directed gene insertion in the presence of mifepristone and show low levels of activity in the absence of the drug. Finally, we show that fusion of another hormone-binding domain, the ERT2 domain, to the {Phi}C31 integrase also results in the creation of an inducible integrase. We expect that these new inducible {Phi}C31 integrase systems will be of great utility in transgenesis and as a tool for studies of safety features of the {Phi}C31 system for therapeutic gene transfer.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmid construction
The Flp coding region [corresponding to enhanced Flp variant, Flpx9, derived from ref. (26)] was PCR-amplified from pHD.SB.Flp (45) and inserted into pBSKS–.CMV-hAAT (46), generating pCMV-Flpx9. The pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro (pLV/FRT-hygro) was previously described in (Moldt,B., Staunstrup,N.H., Jakobsen,M., Yanez-Munoz,R.J. and Mikkelsen,J.G., unpublished data). To generate pCMV-Flpx9.MiBD and pCMV-MiBD.Flpx9, two in-frame fusion constructs were made by overlap extension PCR of a 753-bp MiBD PCR fragment amplified from pT7bhPRB-891 (42) and a 1272-bp Flpx9 PCR fragment amplified from pCMV-Flpx9, and the two fusion constructs were subsequently cloned into NheI-digested pCMV-Flpx9. A short linker with the sequence 5'-GCCGGC-3' connects the MiBD and Flpx9 sequences in the fusion constructs. The pUC.CMV-HSB3 was generated by ligation of a 1023-bp HSB3 PCR fragment, amplified from pCMV-HSB3 (25), into SacII-digested pCMV-SB (47). In pUC.CMV-HSB3 the HSB3 sequence is flanked by a NotI site and a PacI site. The two plasmids pCMV-HSB3.L1.MiBD and pCMV-MiBD.L1.HSB3 contain fusion constructs made by in-frame PCR ligations of a 753-bp MiBD PCR fragment amplified from pT7bhPRB-891 and a 1023-bp HSB3 PCR fragment amplified from pCMV-HSB3. The two fusion constructs were digested with NotI and PacI and cloned into double-digested pUC.CMV-HSB3. A short linker (Linker 1) with the sequence 5'-CCCGGGGGAGGAACTAGT-3' connects the MIBD and HSB3 sequences in the fusion constructs. The pSBT/PGK-puro plasmid, previously referred to as pTpuro, was previously described (48). The pCMV-FP plasmid was constructed by inserting the FP transposase open reading frame, PCR-amplified from pFV-FP (8), into SacII-digested pCMV-SB. To generate pCMV-FP.L1.MiBD the 1023-bp FP transposase gene from pCMV-FP was amplified by PCR and cloned in-frame into NotI/XmaI-digested pCMV-HSB3.L1.MiBD. The pCMV-MiBD.L1.FP plasmid was made by in-frame ligation of the FP gene into SpeI/PacI-digested pCMV-MiBD.L1.HSB3. To construct pFPT/PGK-puro, an overlap PCR product containing the left FP IR, amplified from pFP-neo (8) and the PGK-puro cassette, amplified from pSBT/PGK-puro, was inserted into KpnI/NotI-digested pSBT/PGK-puro. The right FP IR sequence, amplified by PCR from pFP-neo, was inserted into the resulting plasmid digested with NotI and SalI to generate pFPT/PGK-puro. The pCMV-PB and pCMV-Tol2 plasmids were made by PCR amplification of the 1785-bp PB transposase gene from p3X3P-DsRed1 and the 1950-bp Tol2 gene from pCAGGS-T2TP (12) and subsequent ligation of the PCR fragments into NotI/PacI-digested pUC.CMV-HSB3. The four plasmids pCMV-PB.L1.MiBD, pCMV-MiBD.L1.PB, pCMV-Tol2.L1.MiBD and pCMV-MiBD.L1.Tol2 were constructed by ligation of the PB and Tol2 transposase genes into NotI/XmaI-digested pCMV-HSB3.L1.MiBD and SpeI/PacI-digested pCMV-MiBD.L1.HSB3. To construct pPBT/PGK-puro a PGK-puro cassette was amplified from pSBT/PGK-puro by PCR, digested with KpnI and NotI and cloned into double-digested pXL-BacII (49). The pTol2T/PGK-puro plasmid was made by cloning a NheI/BsrGI-digested PGK-puro cassette into double-digested pT2AL200R150 (13). To generate pCMV-{Phi}C31, the 1842-bp {Phi}C31 integrase gene was amplified by PCR from pCMV-Int (18) and ligated into NotI/PacI-digested pUC.CMV-HSB3. The pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD plasmid was made by ligation of the {Phi}C31 integrase gene into NotI/SpeI-digested pCMV-HSB3.L1.MiBD. The pCMV-MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31 plasmid contains a MiBD-{Phi}C31 fusion construct that was made by in-frame PCR ligation of a MiBD PCR fragment amplified from pT7bhPRB-891 (42) and a {Phi}C31 PCR fragment amplified from pCMV-Int. To generate pCMV-MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31, the MiBD-{Phi}C31 fusion construct was ligated into NotI/PacI-digested pUC.CMV-HSB3. Both the pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD plasmid and the pCMV-MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31 plasmid have a short linker (Linker 2), with the sequence 5'-ACTAGT-3', between the {Phi}C31 integrase and the MiBD sequences. To generate pAttB/PGK-puro, the 293-bp attB sequence was amplified by PCR using p11 (22) as template and cloned into EcoRI-digested pSBT/PGK-puro in which the left IR sequence was removed upon insertion of the attB sequence. The pCMV-MiBD.L2.HSB3 was made by insertion of the PCR-amplified HSB3 sequence into SpeI/PacI-digested pCMV-MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31. The pCMV-MiBD.L1.{Phi}C31 plasmid contains a MiBD-{Phi}C31 fusion construct with the linker 5'-CCCGGGGGAGGAACTAGT-3'. The fusion construct was made by in-frame PCR ligation of a MiBD PCR fragment and a {Phi}C31 PCR fragment. To generate pCMV-MiBD.L1.{Phi}C31 the MiBD-{Phi}C31 fusion construct was ligated into NotI/PacI-digested pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD. The pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.ERT2 plasmid was made by insertion of an ERT2 PCR fragment, amplified from pCre-ERT2 (30), into SpeI/PacI-digested pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD. The plasmid pCMV-m{Phi}C31 (pCMV-mINT) has been described previously (22). All produced DNA constructs were verified by restriction digestion and DNA sequencing.

Integration analyses
HeLa (human cervical cancer cells), HEK-293 (human embryonal kidney cells), Hep1A (mouse hepatoma cells) and Flp-In T-Rex HEK-293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin–streptomycin and 1% glutamine. For treatment with mifepristone, the medium was further supplemented with 500 nM mifepristone (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) on the day prior to transfection.

HeLa cells were plated at 2 x 105 cells/well in 6-well dishes 1 day before cotransfection with (i) a donor plasmid, containing a PGK-puro cassette situated in a transposon or together with an attB sequence and (ii) a helper plasmid encoding the different transposases or the {Phi}C31 integrase. Transfections were carried out using FuGene-6 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instructions using 3 µl of reagent per 2 µg of DNA. One microgram of helper plasmid plus 1 µg substrate plasmid was used in each transfection. In negative control experiments, pcDNA3.1D/V5.TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was transfected instead of the helper plasmid. In the dose–response assay and the final comparison of pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.ERT2, 1.5 µg of each helper and substrate plasmid was transfected using 6 µl FuGene-6. One day after transfection, fresh medium was added to the cells. Two days after transfection, cells were split to varying densities and plated in 10-cm dishes. Three days after transfection, selection medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the cells. After 10 days of selection, colonies of cells were stained with methylene blue, air-dried and counted. For analysis of the mifepristone dose–response transfected cells were incubated in medium containing from 0 to 2 µM mifepristone.

The activity of the Flp recombinase fusion proteins was quantified as integration events in cultured Flp-In T-REx 293 cells (Invitrogen). Cells were seeded at 5.5 x 105 cells/dish in 10-cm dishes the day before cotransfection with pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro and different Flp recombinase-expressing plasmids. One hour before transfection, fresh medium was added to the cells. Transfection was performed using calcium-phosphate coprecipitation, and in each transfection 1 µg pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro plus 10 µg recombinase plasmid was used. Three hours posttransfection, the medium was refreshed. Two days after transfection, cells were diluted (1:50 and 1:100) and seeded in 10-cm dishes. Three days after transfection, selection medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) or 200 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen) was added to the cells, and after 10 days of selection colonies were stained in 0.6% methylene blue, air-dried and counted.

β-galactosidase assays
The recombinogenic activity of Flp variants was measured by monitoring expression of β-galactosidase in HEK-293 and Hep1A cells cotransfected (by calcium-phosphate treatment) with 17 µg Flp-encoding plasmid DNA and 2 µg of the reporter construct, pneoβgal (Stratagene, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were seeded at 1 x 104 cells/cm2 in 10-cm dishes on the day prior to transfection. The concentration of β-galactosidase in cell lysates was determined using a βgal ELISA kit (Roche).

Detection of integration at pseudo attP site 19q13.31
The ability of the {Phi}C31.MiBD fusion protein to recognize the pseudo attP site, 19q13.31, was investigated using cultured HEK-293 cells. HEK-293 cells were plated at 2 x 105 cells/well in 6-well dishes on the day before transfection. A total of 1.5 µg of pAttB/PGK-puro together with 1.5 µg pCMV-{Phi}C31 or pCMV-{Phi}C31.MiBD were transfected into the cells using FuGene-6 reagent, with 6 µl reagent per 3 µg DNA. One day posttransfection fresh medium was added to the cells. The cells transfected with pCMV-{Phi}C31.MiBD plasmid received medium supplemented with 500 nM mifepristone. Two days posttransfection, cells were diluted 1/50 and seeded in 10-cm dishes. Three days posttransfection, selection was applied using medium containing 1 µg/ml puromycin. After 10 days of selection, puromycin-resistant colonies were trypsinized and collected in pools. Ten pools were grown to confluency and genomic DNA was extracted. A two-step nested PCR was performed on genomic DNA to detect integration in the pseudo site 19q13.31. Vector- and locus-specific primers were utilized in both PCR steps. The vector-specific primer for the first PCR was 5'-CAGGTACCGTCGACGATGTA-3' and for the second PCR 5'-CGATGTAGGTCACGGTCTCGA-3'. Four genomic primers were designed using the genome database using the UCSC genome browser. First- and second-PCR primers were designed for both the plus strand and the minus strand, in order to detect plasmid integration in both orientations. The plus strand primers were 5'-CATGAGGTGACTGCAGCTTGA-3' for the first PCR and 5'-GATAAGGAATGTGCTGTGCTT-3' for the second PCR. The minus strand primers were 5'-GCTGCATACTGGGCTACACGT-3' for the first PCR and 5'-ATATAGGTTTCAATGAACCTT-3' for the second PCR. Primers were designed to give bands at a size of 350 bp. In the first PCR reactions, 100–400 ng of genomic DNA was used. Two microliters of the first-round PCR products were then used as template in the second-round PCR. In both PCR steps, 40 cycles and an annealing temperature of 57°C were used. Products of the second PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, and bands of the expected size were excised, purified using Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, GA, USA) and sequenced using the primer 5'-CGATGTAGGTCACGGTCTCGA-3'.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-tests, except when different variances were detected by an F-test, in which case statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Mifepristone promotes posttranslational induction of a fusion variant of the Flp recombinase
Previous studies of tyrosine recombinases, like Cre and Flp, C-terminally fused to genetically engineered steroid-binding domains have demonstrated robust hormone-induced recombination activities (30,31,41). Hence, Cre and Flp recombinases fused to the ERT2 estrogen receptor hormone-binding domain are highly responsive to 4-OHT (30,32), whereas the activity of Cre fused to part of the human progesterone receptor can be regulated by mifepristone. To explore further the inducibility of tyrosine recombinases, we initially designed a variant of the Flp recombinase [based on the enhanced Flpx9 variant created by Buchholz et al. (26)], containing a C-terminal MiBD (Figure 1A). The activity of this variant, expressed from pCMV-Flpx9.MiBD, was first analyzed by transient recombination assays in which pCMV-Flpx9.MiBD was cotransfected with the reporter plasmid pneoβgal (Figure 1B). Upon Flp recombination, the neo expression cassette, situated within the βgal reporter gene, was removed from the construct, allowing expression of a functional βgal-FRT fusion variant (50). We first tested the sensitivity of the transient reporter assay by transfecting HEK-293 cells with 2 µg pneoβgal and increasing amounts of pCMV-Flpx9. A linear increase in the β-gal concentration measured in the cell lysate was detected using in the range from 8 to 24 µg of pCMV-Flpx9.MiBD (data not shown). In subsequent experiments, 17 µg of Flp-encoding plasmid and 2 µg pneoβgal was transfected into human HEK-293 cells and Hep1A mouse liver cells, respectively. In both cell lines, the activity of Flpx9.MiBD fusion variant was strongly enhanced in the presence of mifepristone. The activity of the drug-induced Flpx9.MiBD was in both cell lines close to 50% of the activity of the unfused Flpx9 variant (Figure 1C). Moreover, in the absence of mifepristone the fusion variant was inactive and resulted in levels of β-gal production close to the background measured when pneoβgal was cotransfected with pUC19 (negative control). Throughout this and subsequent experiments, mifepristone in control experiments did not affect the activity of the wild-type recombinases (data not shown), indicating that the drug did not directly influence the transfected cells or the recombination processes catalyzed by uninducible recombinases.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. Mifepristone-inducible Flp recombinase mediates gene excision and insertion. (A) Schematic representation of the expression cassette encoding Flpx9 and Flpx9.MiBD. In the Flpx9-MiBD fusion construct, the two domains were separated by a short 6-bp linker (encoding Ala and Gly), indicated by the white box. (B) Schematic representation of β-gal reporter construct used for detection of Flp activity. The pneoβgal contains a neomycin resistance expression cassette (driven by the TK promoter) flanked by FRTs indicated by black arrows. Upon Flp-directed recombination between the two FRT sites a functional β-gal-FRT gene is established, and β-gal protein can be detected by ELISA. (C) Mifepristone-induced Flp recombination in HEK-293 and Hep1A cells. Two micrograms of pneoβgal was cotransfected with 17 µg of the indicated Flp variant (or pUC19 in case of the negative control) in the presence of 300 mM mifepristone. Presence and absence of mifepristone is indicated below the columns by + and –, respectively. The β-gal concentration in cell lysates, harvested 24 h posttransfection, was determined by ELISA and normalized to the total protein content in the sample. (D) Schematic representation of Flp-mediated integration of FRT donor plasmid into the FRT docking site in Flp-In T-Rex 293 cells. pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro contains both a promoterless, ATG-deficient hygromycin B resistance gene and a puromycin resistance gene driven by a PGK promoter. Upon Flp-directed recombination between the FRT site in the donor plasmid and the FRT docking site in the HEK-293-derived cells a functional hygromycin B resistance expression cassette is reconstituted, allowing selection for Flp-mediated insertion events with hygromycin B. (E) and (F) Mifepristone-induced gene insertion by the Flp recombinase in FRT-tagged HEK-293-derived cells. One microgram of pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro was co-transfected with 10 µg Flp-encoding plasmid into Flp-In T-REx 293 cells. Cells were selected by treatment with hygromycin B or puromycin for 10 days before counting colonies. A total of 1.9 x 103 ± 5.7 x 102 hygromycin B-resistant colonies and 8.9 x 103 ± 6.6 x 102 puromycin-resistant colonies was obtained per transfection with pCMV-Flpx9. The activity of the Flp variants tested is presented as percentage of activity relative to the wild-type recombinase. All experiments were performed in triplicates. The asterisks indicate significant differences between relevant groups (P < 0.05).

 
Based on our findings, we investigated whether the mifepristone-responsive Flpx9.MiBD variant could facilitate drug-inducible gene insertion. To test the overall flexibility of regulated Flp variants, we also generated an alternative fusion variant, MiBD.Flpx9, in which MiBD had been fused to the N-terminus of Flp. Constructs encoding the different Flp variants were cotransfected with pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro into HEK-293-derived cells containing an FRT docking vector (Figure 1D). In this set-up, only site-directed plasmid insertion mediated by Flp-directed recombination between the FRT site on pFRT-hygro.PGK-puro and the FRT site within the genomic docking vector would reconstitute a functional hygromycin B resistance expression cassette, allowing selection for Flp-mediated insertion events. In addition, by including a PGK-driven puromycin resistance gene on the plasmid we could compare the efficiency of plasmid insertion by Flp-mediated and random insertion, respectively. As measured by the number of hygromycin B-resistant colonies the activity of Flpx9 and mifepristone-induced Flpx9-MiBD did not differ statistically (P = 0.128) (Figure 1E). However, by selecting transfected cells with puromycin the activity of the induced protein was significantly lower than the wild-type Flpx9 (P = 0.005). In this setup, we measured mifepristone-induced insertion at a level approaching 60% of the unfused Flp (Figure 1F). We also detected a high overall background insertion activity in the absence of the drug, which most likely resulted from the high-transfection rate and resulting random gene insertion in HEK-293 cells. Nevertheless, the number of puromycin-resistant colonies was significantly higher in the presence of mifepristone (P = 0.003) confirming that the Flpx9.MiBD recombinase was robustly induced by the drug. In summary, our data confirm tight steroid-regulated activity of genetically engineered tyrosine recombinases, as shown here for the first time with a mifepristone-induced variant of Flp, and demonstrate efficacy of posttranslationally regulated gene insertion by site-directed nonviral recombinases.

Limited mifepristone-mediated induction of MiBD-containing DNA transposase fusion variants
Tyrosine recombinases fused to steroid-binding domains appear to possess structural and functional properties that allow specific binding of steroids and efficacious induction of catalytic activity in the presence of the relevant drugs. We were attracted by the possibility of regulating other prominent nonviral gene insertion technologies at the posttranslational level using a similar steroid-based regulation approach. We therefore set out to test the potential to induce activities of four different transposases derived from the SB, FP, Tol2 and PB transposons, which are all highly transposable in mammalian cells. The transposase coding sequences of all four elements were inserted either upstream or downstream from the MiBD sequence in the context of expression cassettes driven by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, allowing expression of transposases fused C- and N-terminally, respectively, with MiBD. In all constructs, the fused transposase and MiBD were separated by a 6-amino acid flexible linker (Linker 1, L1, PGGGTS) consisting of three glycine residues flanked by amino acids encoded by the restriction sites separating the two domains (Figure 2A).


Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. Variable levels of mifepristone-induced gene insertion by posttranslationally induced transposases and recombinases. (A) Schematic representation of transposase fusion constructs containing the transposase open reading frame fused 3' or 5' with the sequence encoding the MiBD. Expression of C- or N-terminally tagged fusion variants was driven by a CMV promoter (white arrow). The two protein domains were separated by a short flexible 6-amino acid linker (linker 1, Pro-Gly-Gly-Gly-Thr-Ser), indicated by the white box. (B) and (C) Activity of fusion variants, derived from the hyperactive Sleeping Beauty transposase HSB3 and the Tol2 transposase, in HeLa cells. One microgram of plasmid DNA encoding CMV-driven SB or Tol2 transposase variants was cotransfected with 1 µg pSBT/PGK-puro or pTol2/PGK-puro, respectively. MiBD-fusion variants were analyzed in the presence of 500 nM mifepristone (indicated by ‘+’) or in the absence of mifepristone (indicated by ‘–’). The activity of each variant is presented relative to the activity of the wild-type transposase. A total of 1.3 x 104 ± 4.5 x 103 and 1.3 x 104 ± 3.1 x 103 puromycin-resistant colonies were obtained per transfection with pCMV-HSB3 and pCMV-Tol2, respectively. All experiments were performed in triplicates. The asterisks indicate significant differences between relevant groups (P < 0.05). (D) Schematic representation of {Phi}C31-based fusion constructs containing the {Phi}C31 gene fused 3' or 5' with the sequence encoding the MiBD. Expression of C- or N-terminally tagged fusion variants was driven by a CMV promoter (white arrow). The two protein domains were separated by a short 2-amino acid linker (linker 2, Thr-Ser), indicated by the white box. (E) Activity of fusion variants, derived from the {Phi}C31 integrase, in HeLa cells. One microgram of plasmid DNA encoding CMV-driven {Phi}C31 integrase variants was cotransfected with 1 µg pAttB/PGK-puro. MiBD-fusion variants were analyzed in the presence of 500 nM mifepristone (indicated by ‘+’) or in the absence of mifepristone (indicated by ‘–’). The activity of each variant is presented relative to the activity of the wild-type recombinase. A total of 1.3 x 103 ± 2.0 x 102 puromycin-resistant colonies were obtained per transfection with pCMV-{Phi}C31. All experiments were performed in triplicates. (F) Mifepristone dose–response assay in HeLa cells. One and a half microgram of plasmid DNA encoding the inducible {Phi}C31 integrase (pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD) was cotransfected with 1.5 µg pAttB/PGK-puro in the presence of increasing concentrations of mifepristone. Levels of induction are presented by the exact number of puromycin-resistant colonies obtained after selection. (G) Activity of HSB3 transposase and {Phi}C31 integrase fusion variants containing the L1 or L2 linker. One microgram of plasmid DNA encoding MiBD-HSB3 or {Phi}C31-MiBD fusion proteins containing either L1 or L2 was cotransfected in HeLa cells with 1 µg pSBT/PGK-puro or pAttB/PGK-puro, respectively. The fusion variants were analyzed in the presence of 500 nM mifepristone (indicated by ‘+’) or in the absence of mifepristone (indicated by ‘–’). The activity of each variant is presented relative to the activity of the wild-type (wt) recombinase. All transfections were performed as three independent experiments.

 
For studies of Tc1/mariner transposases, we fused the coding sequence of HSB3, a hyperactive version of the SB transposase (25), with MiBD, generating pCMV-HSB3.L1.MiBD and pCMV-MiBD.L1.HSB3. In separate transfections, plasmid DNA encoding the different transposase variants was introduced into HeLa cells together with pSBT/PGK-puro, a plasmid containing a PGK-driven puromycin resistance gene cassette flanked by SB-derived inverted repeats. After transfection, the cells were selected with puromycin. As evident in Figure 2B neither HSB3.L1.MiBD nor MiBD.L1.HSB3 protein showed significant transposition activity in the presence or absence of mifepristone. The activity of MiBD.L1.HSB3 was ~10% of unfused HSB3 but the fusion protein did not respond to mifepristone. Likewise, N- and C-terminal fusion variants of the FP transposase, did not catalyze efficient insertion of a FP transposon carrying the PGK-puro cassette (data not shown).

We next investigated the transposition activities of the Tol2 transposase fused C- and N-terminally to MiBD by cotransfecting plasmid DNA encoding Tol2 transposase variants with pTol2T/PGK-puro carrying the PGK-puro expression cassette in the context of a Tol2 transposon. The C-terminal fusion of Tol2, Tol2.L1.MiBD, retained ~40% the activity of the wild-type Tol2 transposase in the presence of mifepristone (Figure 2C). In the absence of mifepristone, a reduced level of transposition was observed, which differed statistically from the level obtained with mifepristone (P = 0.004). However, the protein retained substantial drug-independent activity and the level of inducibility was low. The N-terminal fusion variant of the Tol2 transposase was completely inactive and not inducible by mifepristone. In a similar fashion, low levels of induction were monitored with PB transposases fused N- and C-terminally with MiBD and cotransfected with plasmid DNA, pPBT/PGK-puro, containing the PGK-puro cassette in the context of a PB transposon (data not shown).

In summary, of the tested transposase fusion variants with the L1 linker, only the Tol2 fusion was significantly induced in the presence of mifepristone. Although this variant, in particular, showed some activity, the level of induction was at best modest due to robust activity of the protein in the absence of the drug.

Gene insertion by a {Phi}C31 recombinase C-terminally fused with MiBD is inducible and does not possess activity above background level in the absence of mifepristone
The {Phi}C31 recombinase belongs to the family of serine recombinases, which acts through mechanisms of catalysis (involving the catalytic serine) that differ from the mechanisms of the tyrosine recombinases like Cre and Flp (51). The {Phi}C31 recombinase is a high molecular weight serine recombinase with a catalytic domain situated very close to the N-terminus, a flanking DNA-binding domain and a region containing several conserved cysteines required for recombinogenic activity of the protein. For comparison, the catalytic domains of Cre and Flp are located in the C-terminal part of the proteins. Despite structural and mechanistic differences we wanted to explore whether MiBD-containing variants of the {Phi}C31 integrase could be induced when treating target cells with mifepristone. We initially constructed fusion variants containing a 2-amino acid linker (Linker 2, L2) encoded by the cloning linker situated between the integrase and MiBD sequences (Figure 2D). We cotransfected plasmids encoding these variants with a plasmid, pAttB/PGK-puro, carrying both attachment site B (attB) and the PGK-puro gene cassette, into HeLa cells and counted colonies formed after puromycin selection. Both MiBD-tagged versions of the integrase, {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31 were completely inactive in the absence of mifepristone (Figure 2E). Whereas the activity of MiBD.L2.{Phi}C31 did not improve in the presence of mifepristone, {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD proved to be highly inducible when adding mifepristone to the medium. Hence, the presence of mifepristone triggered a 28-fold increase in activity over background (P = 0.003), resulting in a protein that possessed ~40% the activity of the unfused {Phi}C31 integrase (Figure 2E). In addition, a dose–response experiment demonstrated that the {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD protein is responsive to even small amounts of mifepristone, indicating that the system is highly sensitive (Figure 2F).

In summary, our data show highly variable levels of mifepristone-directed inducibility of transposases and recombinases. As the linkers that were used to couple the hormone-binding domain with the catalytic protein differed in length and composition, we constructed a MiBD-HSB3 fusion variant with an intervening L2 sequence. As shown in Figure 2G, both MiBD.L1.HSB3 and MiBD.L2.HSB3 variants were inactive and did not respond to mifepristone. In contrast, the {Phi}C31-derived fusion variants ({Phi}C31.L1.MiBD and {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD) containing either of the two linkers were both inactive in the absence of mifepristone and highly induced in cells treated with the drug (Figure 2G). These data suggest that the composition of the linkers used in the fusion proteins was not the prime cause of the different responses to mifepristone.

As shown by differences in inducibility (relative number of colonies obtained in the presence and absence of mifepristone) (Figure 3), the C-terminal fusion variant of the {Phi}C31 recombinase proved in our hands to be the most tightly mifepristone-regulated gene-inserting protein and was studied, therefore, in further detail.


Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. Inducibility of each of the six tested integration systems. The index value for each system is calculated by dividing the number of puromycin-resistant colonies obtained in the presence of mifepristone with the number of colonies obtained in the absence of mifepristone (data taken from Figures 1F and 2). All index values were determined by colony-forming assays in HeLa cells, except for the activity of Flp that was analyzed in HEK-293-derived cells.

 
Induced {Phi}C31.MiBD recombinase mediates site-directed gene insertion into a known hotspot in human cells
The {Phi}C31 integrase mediates site-specific recombination between the attB site on the vector plasmid and pseudo-attP sites dispersed throughout the human genome (18,20). Hotspot insertion sites have been identified in human cells including HEK-293 cells (20,21). To investigate whether the mifepristone-induced {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD recombinase has retained properties of site-directed gene insertion into hotspot sites, we analyzed puromycin-resistant clones for insertions into the 19q13.31 pseudo site (21). We pooled colonies obtained by {Phi}C31- and {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD-directed gene insertion and screened genomic DNA from these pools by PCR analysis using primers annealing to the inserted vector and to sequences flanking the 19q13.31 site (Figure 4A). Among 10 analyzed pools, each consisting of ~50 clones obtained by {Phi}C31-mediated gene insertion, nine pools were found to contain insertions in both orientations in this particular site (Figure 4B). In one pool, we could detect an insertion in only one of the two orientations. For insertions mediated by mifepristone-induced {Phi}C31.MiBD protein the pools on average consisted of ~25 clones. Among 10 analyzed pools, one or more insertions in the first of the two orientations could be detected in six pools, whereas five pools contained at least one insertion in the opposite orientation. In consideration of the different numbers of screened colonies with the wild-type and the inducible integrase, our findings suggest that the specificity of {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD, allowing insertion in a previously identified hotspot, is unaltered in comparison with the unfused {Phi}C31 recombinase. However, based on these findings we cannot formally exclude the possibility that the induced {Phi}C31 integrase may have altered recombinogenic properties that reduce or increase its site-selectivity.


Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. Analysis of {Phi}C31.MiBD-mediated gene insertion at pseudo attP site 19q13.31. (A) Schematic representation of {Phi}C31-mediated insertion of attB donor plasmid into the 19q13.31 pseudo attP site in HEK-293 cells. The pAttB/PGK-puro contains an attB site and a puromycin resistance gene driven by a PGK promoter. {Phi}C31-mediated recombination between the attB site in the donor plasmid and the 19q13.31 hotspot pseudo site in HEK-293 cells will lead to insertion of the donor plasmid into the hotspot site in either a forward or reverse orientation. The black arrows indicate vector- and locus-specific primers. (B) Detection of {Phi}C31.MiBD-mediated gene insertion at pseudo attP site 19q13.31. A total of 1.5 µg of pAttB/PGK-puro was cotransfected with 1.5 µg pCMV-{Phi}C31 or pCMV- {Phi}C31.MiBD into HEK-293 cells. Cells were selected by treatment with puromycin, and after 10 days of selection resistant colonies were pooled. Genomic DNA from pooled colonies was screened by PCR analysis using vector- and locus-specific primers.

 
Inducible gene insertion by a {Phi}C31 recombinase C-terminally fused with the ERT2 domain
Tight regulation of tyrosine recombinases fused to the modified estrogen receptor hormone-binding domain, ERT2, has previously been reported (30). We therefore wanted to develop a {Phi}C31 fusion variant containing a C-terminally fused ERT2 domain and compare induction of this variant by 4-OHT with mifepristone-based induction of {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD. We exchanged the MiBD sequence in pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.MiBD with the ERT2 sequence, creating a novel fusion construct, pCMV-{Phi}C31.L2.ERT2. In colony-forming assays using pAttB/PGK-puro as substrate, transfected cells were cultivated in medium containing 500 nM mifepristone or 500 nM 4-OHT for induction of the {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and {Phi}C31.L2.ERT2 variants, respectively. Transfections with plasmid DNA encoding the wild-type {Phi}C31 or a mutated form, m{Phi}C31, were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 5, the patterns of induction with mifepristone and 4-OHT were very similar. In the presence of the drug, we detected close to 2500 colonies with both {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and {Phi}C31.L2.ERT2. This result indicated that the fusion variants had retained activities that were comparable to the wild-type protein, although the numbers of colonies obtained with wild-type {Phi}C31 and the induced fusion variants did indeed vary statistically (P = 0.008 for {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD; P = 0.034 for {Phi}C31.L2.ERT2). Moreover, the presence of mifepristone and 4-OHT induced function of the two fusion variants 14- and 22-fold above the background (P = 0.025 and P = 0.025, respectively). Notably, comparable numbers of colonies obtained in cells treated with m{Phi}C31 and the uninduced fusion variants (P = 0.11 and P = 0.33 for m{Phi}C31 versus {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and {Phi}C31.L2.ERT2, respectively) indicated that gene insertion in the absence of the drug was not facilitated by residual function of the fusion integrase but more likely originated from randomly inserted plasmid DNA. In summary, we conclude that the activity of the {Phi}C31 recombinase fused with steroid-binding domains can be tightly regulated at the posttranslational level.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. Steroid-directed gene insertion facilitated by {Phi}C31 integrase fusion variants. A total of 1.5 µg of pAttB/PGK-puro was cotransfected into HeLa cells with 1.5 µg plasmid DNA encoding the indicated variants of the {Phi}C31 integrase. {Phi}C31.L2.MiBD and {Phi}C31.L2.ERT2 were analyzed in the absence of steroid (indicated by ‘–’) or in the presence of 500 nM mifepristone (left panel) and 500 nM 4-OHT (right panel), respectively. All transfections were performed as three independent experiments. The asterisks indicate significant differences between relevant groups (P < 0.05).

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Site-specific recombination mediated by tyrosine recombinases—Cre or Flp—has been widely utilized to generate specific genomic DNA rearrangements in somatic cells of transgenic animals (1). In this report, we describe for the first time the development of tightly drug-regulated serine recombinases derived from the Streptomyces phage {Phi}C31 integrase. By fusing hPR891 and ERT2 ligand-binding domains to the C-terminus of {Phi}C31 integrase, we created variants that were, in a comparative study, inducible by a factor of 14 and 22 in the presence of mifepristone and tamoxifen, respectively. In the absence of the relevant steroids, hPR891- and ERT2-containing fusion proteins are believed to be sequestered by heat-shock proteins (52) and therefore retained in the cytoplasm. Upon drug administration, the ligands bind to the fusion proteins, facilitating the release of heat-shock proteins and translocation of active proteins to the nucleus. Induced variants retained between 66% and 75% of the activity of the unmodified {Phi}C31 protein and the proteins were inactive in the absence of steroid, as measured by colony formation assays. Inducible {Phi}C31 integrase fusion variants containing different internal linker regions could be induced to similar levels of activity, whereas a fusion variant containing an N-terminal steroid-binding domain were inactive and did not respond to the drug. Furthermore, our data suggest that mifepristone-induced {Phi}C31 integrase has retained the same integration profile as the uninduced wild-type version of the integrase. Altogether, drug-inducible {Phi}C31 integrases possessed properties and inducibilities comparable to the properties of the steroid-induced tyrosine recombinases, in this study represented by a mifepristone-induced variant of Flp that has not previously been described.

The {Phi}C31 integrase is active in mammalian cells and facilitates recombination between the heterotypic attB and attP sequences. The resulting recombination sites, attL and attR, are not substrates for the {Phi}C31 integrase, and the recombination process is therefore irreversible. For Cre and Flp, in contrast, the recognition sites generated after recombination are immediate substrates for excision, rendering an integrated gene cassette vulnerable for subsequent recombinase-directed re-excision. In this perspective, the {Phi}C31 integrase has become an attractive novel tool for genomic engineering. Indeed, recent findings have demonstrated that the {Phi}C31 integrase mediates efficient site-specific cassette exchange in mouse embryonic stem cells (53) and site-specific gene insertion in single-cell mouse embryos (54) and human embryonic stem cells (55). Moreover, expression of the {Phi}C31 integrase appears to be compatible with normal mouse development (53). Hence, we envision that strictly controlled inducible versions of the {Phi}C31 integrase could be of important use together with Cre and/or Flp in more complex schemes of genomic engineering, providing more sophisticated options for genetic alterations such as sequential deletion or insertion of transgenes (e.g. selective marker genes) in somatic cells. Such applications will require generation of transgenic mice expressing regulatable variants of the {Phi}C31 integrase.

Site-directed insertion of attB-tagged plasmid DNA into pseudo-attP sites in the genome has made the {Phi}C31 integrase-directed gene insertion an attractive option for persistent nonviral gene therapy. Indeed, the system has been shown to facilitate in vivo gene insertion in a range of tissues including mouse liver (56–58) and muscle (59) as well as rat retina (60) and rabbit joints (61). However, recent findings suggest that the system might be harnessed by a tendency to cause DNA rearrangement, deletions and interchromosomal translocations (21,56,62), possibly caused by integrase-directed recombination between genomic pseudo sites. It is not yet clear if such genomic abnormalities are caused by high levels of {Phi}C31 integrase in cell culture or if such events may occur also in vivo as a result of a transient boost or prolonged expression of the {Phi}C31 integrase. Investigations of steroid-directed induction of {Phi}C31 integrase activity may shed further light on these issues and suggest use of inducible nonviral systems to enhance safety. In any case, a regulatable approach will allow the protein to act in a predetermined time window, which can be determined by administration of synthetic steroids.

Binding of steroids to hPR891- and ERT2-containing fusion proteins would in theory allow the use of steroid-binding domains for posttranslational regulation of a variety of proteins with catalytic activities in the nucleus. Indeed, a mifepristone-regulated fusion variant of the adeno-associated virus Rep protein and a tamoxifen-inducible variant of the PB transposase have been shown to facilitate drug-dependent gene insertion (63,64). In the present study, we investigated steroid-directed induction of SB, FP, PB and Tol2 transposases. Using a flexible linker consisting of six amino acids, we showed that the modified Tc1/mariner transposases, derived from SB and FP, as well as the PB transposase could not be regulated by mifepristone, whereas the activity of the Tol2 transposase fused C-terminally to the steroid-binding domain was upregulated in the presence of mifepristone. However, the Tol2 fusion variant also showed a high basal level of activity in the absence of the drug, indicating that further genetic optimizations would be required to obtain tightly regulated proteins with negligible activity in the absence of mifepristone. Previous findings have suggested that the PB transposase appears to be structurally flexible, allowing fusion with alternative protein domains, like DNA-binding domains, without losing its catalytic activity (65,66). However, in a previous study only one of three tested PB transposase-ERT2 fusion variants, each containing different linkers between the two domains, was found to be active in the presence of tamoxifen (64). Our findings confirm that short linkers in the context of a PB transposase fusion result in proteins with low drug inducibility.

Recent data have demonstrated that SB transposases containing N-terminal fusion domains can retain transposition activity albeit with reduced efficiency (28,29,67). We have previously developed functional fusion transposases based on the hyperactive HSB3 variant and have verified their production by western blotting (Sharma,N., Moldt,B., Mikkelsen,J.G., unpublished observations). Thus, the lack of activity of MiBD-containing variants most likely reflects specific structural alterations, rendering the fusion protein inactive. In case of the Tol2 transposase, a previous attempt to create a fusion variant was unsuccessful (66). As a demonstration of difficulties predicting the catalytic status of transposase fusions, we detected robust insertional activities of the Tol2 transposase tagged C-terminally with MiBD. Although this fusion was also somewhat active in the absence of mifepristone and therefore not tightly regulated, our results suggest that the Tol2 transposase is indeed flexible and may remain active as part of a fusion protein.

Our studies demonstrate efficient posttranslational induction of tyrosine and serine recombinases, which appear more functionally and structurally flexible than the various tested transposon systems. We believe that the inducible {Phi}C31 integrase, in particular, will find use not only in future transgenesis applications but also in important safety studies of the {Phi}C31 integrase for therapeutic gene transfer.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
 
We thank Malcolm Fraser (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA) for providing piggyBac constructs, Koichi Kawakami (National Institute of Genetics, Mishima City, Shizuoka, Japan) for providing Tol2 constructs, Zsuzanna Izsvak (Max Delbrück Center, Berlin, Germany) for providing Frog Prince constructs, Perry Hackett (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) for providing the original Sleeping Beauty constructs, Michele Calos (Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA) for providing the {Phi}C31 system, Bert W. O’Malley (Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, Houston, Texas, USA) for providing phPRB-891 and Pierre Chambon (Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, Strasbourg, France) for providing pCreERT2. This work was made possible through the generous support by the Danish Medical Research Council, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation, the Danish Cancer Society, Aage Bangs Foundation, the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation and the EU (EU-FP6-STREP, contract number 018961). B.M. was funded by a grant from the Danish Cancer Society and N.S by a grant from the Novo Scholarship Programme in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Branda CS, Dymecki SM. Talking about a revolution: the impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev. Cell (2004) 6:7–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  2. Shinohara ET, Kaminski JM, Segal DJ, Pelczar P, Kolhe R, Ryan T, Coates CJ, Fraser MJ, Handler AM, Yanagimachi R, et al. Active integration: new strategies for transgenesis. Transgenic Res. (2007) 16:333–339.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  3. Wu S, Ying G, Wu Q, Capecchi MR. Toward simpler and faster genome-wide mutagenesis in mice. Nat. Genet. (2007) 39:922–930.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  4. Calos MP. The phiC31 integrase system for gene therapy. Curr. Gene Ther. (2006) 6:633–645.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  5. Ivics Z, Izsvak Z. Transposons for gene therapy! Curr. Gene Ther. (2006) 6:593–607.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  6. Geurts AM, Yang Y, Clark KJ, Liu G, Cui Z, Dupuy AJ, Bell JB, Largaespada DA, Hackett PB. Gene transfer into genomes of human cells by the sleeping beauty transposon system. Mol. Ther. (2003) 8:108–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  7. Ivics Z, Hackett PB, Plasterk RH, Izsvak Z. Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like transposon from fish, and its transposition in human cells. Cell (1997) 91:501–510.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  8. Miskey C, Izsvak Z, Plasterk RH, Ivics Z. The Frog Prince: a reconstructed transposon from Rana pipiens with high transpositional activity in vertebrate cells. Nucleic Acids Res. (2003) 31:6873–6881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Sivasubbu S, Balciunas D, Davidson AE, Pickart MA, Hermanson SB, Wangensteen KJ, Wolbrink DC, Ekker SC. Gene-breaking transposon mutagenesis reveals an essential role for histone H2afza in zebrafish larval development. Mech. Dev. (2006) 123:513–529.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  10. Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, Xu T. Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell (2005) 122:473–483.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  11. Handler AM. Use of the piggyBac transposon for germ-line transformation of insects. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2002) 32:1211–1220.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  12. Kawakami K, Noda T. Transposition of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish Oryzias latipes, in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genetics (2004) 166:895–899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Kawakami K, Shima A, Kawakami N. Identification of a functional transposase of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish, and its transposition in the zebrafish germ lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97:11403–11408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Wilson MH, Coates CJ, George A.L. Jr. PiggyBac Transposon-mediated Gene Transfer in Human Cells. Mol. Ther. (2007) 15:139–145.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  15. Dymecki SM. Flp recombinase promotes site-specific DNA recombination in embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93:6191–6196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Kanki H, Suzuki H, Itohara S. High-efficiency CAG-FLPe deleter mice in C57BL/6J background. Exp. Anim. (2006) 55:137–141.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  17. Rodriguez CI, Buchholz F, Galloway J, Sequerra R, Kasper J, Ayala R, Stewart AF, Dymecki SM. High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat. Genet. (2000) 25:139–140.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  18. Groth AC, Olivares EC, Thyagarajan B, Calos MP. A phage integrase directs efficient site-specific integration in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97:5995–6000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Rausch H, Lehmann M. Structural analysis of the actinophage phi C31 attachment site. Nucleic Acids Res. (1991) 19:5187–5189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Thyagarajan B, Olivares EC, Hollis RP, Ginsburg DS, Calos MP. Site-specific genomic integration in mammalian cells mediated by phage phiC31 integrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2001) 21:3926–3934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Chalberg TW, Portlock JL, Olivares EC, Thyagarajan B, Kirby PJ, Hillman RT, Hoelters J, Calos MP. Integration specificity of phage phiC31 integrase in the human genome. J. Mol. Biol. (2006) 357:28–48.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  22. Ehrhardt A, Xu H, Huang Z, Engler JA, Kay MA. A direct comparison of two nonviral gene therapy vectors for somatic integration: in vivo evaluation of the bacteriophage integrase phiC31 and the Sleeping Beauty transposase. Mol. Ther. (2005) 11:695–706.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  23. Raymond CS, Soriano P. High-efficiency FLP and PhiC31 site-specific recombination in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE (2007) 2:e162.[CrossRef]

  24. Baus J, Liu L, Heggestad AD, Sanz S, Fletcher BS. Hyperactive transposase mutants of the Sleeping Beauty transposon. Mol. Ther. (2005) 12:1148–1156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  25. Yant SR, Park J, Huang Y, Mikkelsen JG, Kay MA. Mutational analysis of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of sleeping beauty transposase: critical residues for DNA binding and hyperactivity in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2004) 24:9239–9247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Buchholz F, Angrand PO, Stewart AF. Improved properties of FLP recombinase evolved by cycling mutagenesis. Nat. Biotechnol. (1998) 16:657–662.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  27. Sclimenti CR, Thyagarajan B, Calos MP. Directed evolution of a recombinase for improved genomic integration at a native human sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. (2001) 29:5044–5051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Ivics Z, Katzer A, Stuwe EE, Fiedler D, Knespel S, Izsvak Z. Targeted Sleeping Beauty transposition in human cells. Mol. Ther. (2007) 15:1137–1144.[Web of Science][Medline]

  29. Yant SR, Huang Y, Akache B, Kay MA. Site-directed transposon integration in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. (2007) 35:e50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1997) 237:752–757.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  31. Logie C, Stewart AF. Ligand-regulated site-specific recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1995) 92:5940–5944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Hunter NL, Awatramani RB, Farley FW, Dymecki SM. Ligand-activated Flpe for temporally regulated gene modifications. Genesis (2005) 41:99–109.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  33. Metzger D, Chambon P. Site- and time-specific gene targeting in the mouse. Methods (2001) 24:71–80.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  34. Imai T, Jiang M, Chambon P, Metzger D. Impaired adipogenesis and lipolysis in the mouse upon selective ablation of the retinoid X receptor alpha mediated by a tamoxifen-inducible chimeric Cre recombinase (Cre-ERT2) in adipocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98:224–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Yajima I, Belloir E, Bourgeois Y, Kumasaka M, Delmas V, Larue L. Spatiotemporal gene control by the Cre-ERT2 system in melanocytes. Genesis (2006) 44:34–43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  36. el Marjou F, Janssen KP, Chang BH, Li M, Hindie V, Chan L, Louvard D, Chambon P, Metzger D, Robine S. Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis (2004) 39:186–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  37. Zhu HZ, Chen JQ, Cheng GX, Xue JL. Generation and characterization of transgenic mice expressing tamoxifen-inducible cre-fusion protein specifically in mouse liver. World J. Gastroenterol. (2003) 9:1844–1847.[Web of Science][Medline]

  38. Hirrlinger PG, Scheller A, Braun C, Hirrlinger J, Kirchhoff F. Temporal control of gene recombination in astrocytes by transgenic expression of the tamoxifen-inducible DNA recombinase variant CreERT2. Glia (2006) 54:11–20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  39. Slezak M, Goritz C, Niemiec A, Frisen J, Chambon P, Metzger D, Pfrieger FW. Transgenic mice for conditional gene manipulation in astroglial cells. Glia (2007) 55:1565–1576.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  40. Zhao J, Nassar MA, Gavazzi I, Wood JN. Tamoxifen-inducible NaV1.8-CreERT2 recombinase activity in nociceptive neurons of dorsal root ganglia. Genesis (2006) 44:364–371.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  41. Kellendonk C, Tronche F, Monaghan AP, Angrand PO, Stewart F, Schutz G. Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by the synthetic steroid RU 486. Nucleic Acids Res. (1996) 24:1404–1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Vegeto E, Allan GF, Schrader WT, Tsai MJ, McDonnell DP, O’Malley BW. The mechanism of RU486 antagonism is dependent on the conformation of the carboxy-terminal tail of the human progesterone receptor. Cell (1992) 69:703–713.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  43. Kellendonk C, Tronche F, Casanova E, Anlag K, Opherk C, Schutz G. Inducible site-specific recombination in the brain. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 285:175–182.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  44. Cao T, Longley MA, Wang XJ, Roop DR. An inducible mouse model for epidermolysis bullosa simplex: implications for gene therapy. J. Cell Biol. (2001) 152:651–656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Yant SR, Ehrhardt A, Mikkelsen JG, Meuse L, Pham T, Kay MA. Transposition from a gutless adeno-transposon vector stabilizes transgene expression in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. (2002) 20:999–1005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  46. Mikkelsen JG, Yant SR, Meuse L, Huang Z, Xu H, Kay MA. Helper-independent Sleeping Beauty transposon-transposase vectors for efficient nonviral gene delivery and persistent gene expression in vivo. Mol. Ther. (2003) 8:654–665.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  47. Yant SR, Meuse L, Chiu W, Ivics Z, Izsvak Z, Kay MA. Somatic integration and long-term transgene expression in normal and haemophilic mice using a DNA transposon system. Nat. Genet. (2000) 25:35–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  48. Yant SR, Kay MA. Nonhomologous-end-joining factors regulate DNA repair fidelity during Sleeping Beauty element transposition in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2003) 23:8505–8518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  49. Li X, Harrell RA, Handler AM, Beam T, Hennessy K, Fraser M.J. Jr. piggyBac internal sequences are necessary for efficient transformation of target genomes. Insect Mol. Biol. (2005) 14:17–30.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  50. O’Gorman S, Fox DT, Wahl GM. Recombinase-mediated gene activation and site-specific integration in mammalian cells. Science (1991) 251:1351–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Smith MC, Thorpe HM. Diversity in the serine recombinases. Mol. Microbiol. (2002) 44:299–307.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  52. Chambraud B, Berry M, Redeuilh G, Chambon P, Baulieu EE. Several regions of human estrogen receptor are involved in the formation of receptor-heat shock protein 90 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. (1990) 265:20686–20691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  53. Belteki G, Gertsenstein M, Ow DW, Nagy A. Site-specific cassette exchange and germline transmission with mouse ES cells expressing phiC31 integrase. Nat. Biotechnol. (2003) 21:321–324.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  54. Hollis RP, Stoll SM, Sclimenti CR, Lin J, Chen-Tsai Y, Calos MP. Phage integrases for the construction and manipulation of transgenic mammals. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. (2003) 1:79.[CrossRef][Medline]

  55. Thyagarajan B, Liu Y, Shin S, Lakshmipathy U, Scheyhing K, Xue H, Ellerstrom C, Strehl R, Hyllner J, Rao MS, et al. Creation of engineered human embryonic stem cell lines using phiC31 integrase. Stem Cells (2008) 26:119–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  56. Ehrhardt A, Engler JA, Xu H, Cherry AM, Kay MA. Molecular analysis of chromosomal rearrangements in mammalian cells after phiC31-mediated integration. Hum. Gene. Ther. (2006) 17:1077–1094.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  57. Held PK, Olivares EC, Aguilar CP, Finegold M, Calos MP, Grompe M. In vivo correction of murine hereditary tyrosinemia type I by phiC31 integrase-mediated gene delivery. Mol. Ther. (2005) 11:399–408.[Web of Science][Medline]

  58. Olivares EC, Hollis RP, Chalberg TW, Meuse L, Kay MA, Calos MP. Site-specific genomic integration produces therapeutic Factor IX levels in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. (2002) 20:1124–1128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  59. Portlock JL, Keravala A, Bertoni C, Lee S, Rando TA, Calos MP. Long-term increase in mVEGF164 in mouse hindlimb muscle mediated by phage phiC31 integrase after nonviral DNA delivery. Hum. Gene Ther. (2006) 17:871–876.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  60. Chalberg TW, Genise HL, Vollrath D, Calos MP. phiC31 integrase confers genomic integration and long-term transgene expression in rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (2005) 46:2140–2146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Keravala A, Portlock JL, Nash JA, Vitrant DG, Robbins PD, Calos MP. PhiC31 integrase mediates integration in cultured synovial cells and enhances gene expression in rabbit joints. J. Gene. Med. (2006) 8:1008–1017.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  62. Liu J, Jeppesen I, Nielsen K, Jensen TG. Phi c31 integrase induces chromosomal aberrations in primary human fibroblasts. Gene Ther. (2006) 13:1188–1190.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  63. Rinaudo D, Lamartina S, Roscilli G, Ciliberto G, Toniatti C. Conditional site-specific integration into human chromosome 19 by using a ligand-dependent chimeric adeno-associated virus/Rep protein. J. Virol. (2000) 74:281–294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  64. Cadinanos J, Bradley A. Generation of an inducible and optimized piggyBac transposon system. Nucleic Acids Res. (2007) 35:e87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  65. Maragathavally KJ, Kaminski JM, Coates CJ. Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration. FASEB J. (2006) 20:1880–1882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  66. Wu SC, Meir YJ, Coates CJ, Handler AM, Pelczar P, Moisyadi S, Kaminski JM. piggyBac is a flexible and highly active transposon as compared to sleeping beauty, Tol2, and Mos1 in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2006) 103:15008–15013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  67. Wilson MH, Kaminski JM, George A.L. Jr. Functional zinc finger/sleeping beauty transposase chimeras exhibit attenuated overproduction inhibition. FEBS Lett. (2005) 579:6205–6209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Sangiorgi, Z. Shuhua, and M. R. Capecchi
In vivo evaluation of PhiC31 recombinase activity using a self-excision cassette
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(20): e134 - e134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (7643K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (693K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/11/e67    most recent
gkn298v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mikkelsen, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?