Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on March 30, 2009
Nucleic Acids Research 2009 37(10):3367-3376; doi:10.1093/nar/gkp200
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (4515K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (535K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/10/3367    most recent
gkp200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurumizaka, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurumizaka, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 10 3367-3376
© 2009
The Author(s) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication

DIDS, a chemical compound that inhibits RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange

Takako Ishida1, Yoshimasa Takizawa1, Takashi Kainuma1, Jin Inoue2, Tsutomu Mikawa2,3, Takehiko Shibata2, Hidekazu Suzuki4, Satoshi Tashiro4 and Hitoshi Kurumizaka1,*

1Laboratory of Structural Biology, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8480, 2RIKEN Advanced Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, 3RIKEN SPring-8 center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148 and 4Department of Cellular Biology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 3 5369 7315; Fax: +81 3 5367 2820; Email: kurumizaka{at}waseda.jp

Received December 4, 2008. Revised March 11, 2009. Accepted March 11, 2009.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
RAD51, an essential eukaryotic DNA recombinase, promotes homologous pairing and strand exchange during homologous recombination and the recombinational repair of double strand breaks. Mutations that up- or down-regulate RAD51 gene expression have been identified in several tumors, suggesting that inappropriate expression of the RAD51 activity may cause tumorigenesis. To identify chemical compounds that affect the RAD51 activity, in the present study, we performed the RAD51-mediated strand exchange assay in the presence of 185 chemical compounds. We found that 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS) efficiently inhibited the RAD51-mediated strand exchange. DIDS also inhibited the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing in the absence of RPA. A surface plasmon resonance analysis revealed that DIDS directly binds to RAD51. A gel mobility shift assay showed that DIDS significantly inhibited the DNA-binding activity of RAD51. Therefore, DIDS may bind near the DNA binding site(s) of RAD51 and compete with DNA for RAD51 binding.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Genomic DNA is continuously under attack from exogenous and endogenous mutagens, such as ionizing radiation, oxygen-free radicals, DNA cross-linking reagents and DNA replication failure. Such mutagens cause double-strand breaks (DSBs), which induce chromosome aberrations and tumorigenesis if they are not repaired appropriately (1,2). Homologous recombinational repair (HRR) is an accurate pathway for DSB repair without base substitutions, deletions and insertions (3–5).

RAD51 is an essential protein for the HRR pathway (6). The RAD51-gene knockout in mice results in early embryonic lethality (7,8). In chicken DT40 cells, the RAD51-knockout causes cell death, with the accumulation of unrepaired DSBs (9). These facts indicated that RAD51 is actually required for DSB repair in higher eukaryotes. Consistent with the importance of RAD51 in the HRR pathway, mutations in the RAD51 gene have been identified in several tumors (10–14). Most of the RAD51 mutations in tumor cells were found in its non-coding region, suggesting that improper up- and down-regulation of the RAD51 activity may be a source of tumorigenesis. A missense RAD51 mutation, in which Arg150 is replaced by Gln (R150Q), was also found in patients with bilateral breast cancer (10,15). In addition, the Tyr315 residue of RAD51 was found to be constitutively phosphorylated by the BCR/ABL fusion protein, which is derived from the translocation of the c-ABL gene from chromosome 9 to the BCR gene locus on chromosome 22 (Philadelphia chromosome) in leukemia patients (16). These findings strongly suggest the involvement of the RAD51 activity in tumorigenesis or tumor progression.

During HRR, RAD51 assembles onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails, which are produced at the DSB sites, and forms a helical filamentous polymer. This RAD51-ssDNA filament then binds to intact double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and a nascent heteroduplex is formed between the ssDNA and the complementary strand of dsDNA within the filament (homologous pairing). The heteroduplex region is then extended by RAD51 with ATP hydrolysis (strand exchange). These RAD51-mediated recombination reactions, such as homologous pairing and strand exchange, are the key steps in DSB repair through the HRR pathway (17–21). Therefore, alterations of the RAD51-mediated recombination reactions by chemical compounds may result in the suppression of tumorigenesis and/or tumor progression.

To identify chemical compounds that regulate the RAD51 recombinase activity, in the present study, we screened 185 chemical compounds for their effects on RAD51-mediated strand exchange in vitro. We found that 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS) efficiently inhibited the RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand-exchange reactions.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Proteins
Hexahistidine-tagged human RAD51 was overexpressed in the Escherichia coli strain JM109 (DE3), which also carried an expression vector for the minor tRNAs (Codon(+)RIL, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). The RAD51 expressed in the E. coli strain was purified by a four-step method, as described previously (22). In this method, the purified RAD51 lacked the hexahistidine tag. Human RPA was produced in E. coli cells, and was prepared according to the published protocol (23). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method (24), with bovine serum albumin as the standard protein.

DNAs
The {phi}X174 phage ssDNA and dsDNA used in the DNA-binding and strand-exchange assays were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). All of the DNA concentrations are expressed in moles of nucleotides.

Assay for strand exchange
The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (20 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (6 µM) in the presence of a chemical compound at 37°C for 10 min, in 10 µl of 26 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), containing 45 mM NaCl, 0.03 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 3% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 2 mM CaCl2, 20 mM creatine phosphate and 75 µg/ml creatine kinase. After this incubation, 2 µM RPA was added to the reaction mixture, which was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The reactions were then initiated by the addition of 20 µM {phi}X174 linear dsDNA, and were continued for 60 min. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 0.1% SDS and 1.97 mg/ml proteinase K (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland), and were further incubated at 37°C for 20 min. After adding 6-fold loading dye, the deproteinized reaction products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer at 3.3 V/cm for 4 h. The products were visualized by SYBR Gold (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) staining. When the reactions were performed with the 32P-labeled dsDNA, the gels were dried, exposed to an imaging plate and visualized using an FLA-7000 imaging analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).

The D-loop formation assay
To prevent the dsDNA substrates from undergoing irreversible denaturation, superhelical dsDNA (pB5Sarray DNA), which contained 11 repeats of a sea urchin 5S rRNA gene (207-bp fragment) within the pBlueScript II SK(+) vector, was prepared by a method avoiding alkaline treatment of the cells harboring the plasmid DNA (25,26). For the ssDNA substrate, the following high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-purified oligonucleotide was used: 50-mer, 5'-GGA ATT CGG TAT TCC CAG GCG GTC TCC CAT CCA AGT ACT AAC CGA GCC CT-3'. The 5'-end of the oligonucleotide was labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in the presence of [{gamma}-32P]ATP. RAD51 (0.1 µM) was incubated with the indicated amount of DIDS at 37°C for 5 min, in 7 µl of reaction buffer, containing 22 mM HEPES–NaOH (pH 7.5), 15 mM NaCl, 0.01 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM AMPPNP and 0.1 mg/ml BSA. The 32P-labeled 50-mer oligonucleotide (1 µM) was then added, and the samples were further incubated at 37°C for 5 min. The pB5Sarray superhelical dsDNA (10 µM) was added along with 9 mM MgCl2 to initiate the homologous-pairing reaction. The reactions were continued at 37°C for 30 min, and were stopped by the addition of 0.1% SDS and 1.97 mg/ml proteinase K (Roche Applied Science). After deproteinization at 37°C for 15 min, the reaction products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer at 3.3 V/cm for 2.5 h. The gels were dried, exposed to an imaging plate, and visualized using an FLA-7000 imaging analyzer (Fujifilm).

ATPase activity
RAD51 (6 µM) was incubated with 1 mM ATP (Roche Applied Science) in 26 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), containing 45 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 3% glycerol, 0.03 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, in the presence or absence of ssDNA. In the ssDNA-dependent reaction, the {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) was used as the substrate. The reaction was performed at 37°C. After a 10 min pre-incubation in the absence of ATP, the reaction was initiated by adding 1 mM ATP. At each indicated time, a 20 µl aliquot of the reaction mixture was removed and mixed with 30 µl of 100 mM EDTA, to quench the reaction. The amount of inorganic phosphate released was determined by a colorimetric assay. Briefly, a 500 µl aliquot of a malachite green solution [0.034%(w/v) malachite green oxalate, 1.05%(w/v) hexaammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate, and 0.1%(w/v) polyvinyl alcohol in 1 M HCl] was mixed with 50 µl of sample solution (i.e. the reaction mixture quenched with EDTA). After 1 min, 50 µl of 34%(w/v) sodium citrate dihydrate was added to stop further color development. The absorbance at 655 nm was measured with a 96-well micro plate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). A 1 mg/ml phosphate ion standard solution (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) was used to prepare the phosphate standards.

Assays for DNA binding
The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) or {phi}X174 linear dsDNA (10 µM) was mixed with RAD51 in 10 µl of 24 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), containing 30 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2% glycerol, 0.02 mM EDTA, 0.4 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1 mM ATP, 20 mM creatine phosphate, 75 µg/ml creatine kinase and 2 mM CaCl2. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 15 min, and were then analyzed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris–acetate and 1 mM EDTA) at 3.3V/cm for 2.5 h. The bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. For the RPA-ssDNA binding assay, the {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) was mixed with RPA in 10 µl of 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), containing 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2% glycerol, 1.2 mM dithiothreitol and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin.

Gel filtration
RAD51 (45 µg) was incubated with 100 µM of DIDS, and the samples were analyzed by Superdex 200 HR 10/30 (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) gel filtration chromatography. The elution buffer contained 20 mM HEPES–NaOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 10% glycerol, and the flow rate was 0.5 ml/min.

Surface plasmon resonance analysis
The interaction between RAD51 and DIDS was detected with a Biacore T100 surface plasmon resonance biosensor (GE Healthcare Biosciences). RAD51 was immobilized to the sensor surface of a CM-5 sensor chip by the random amine coupling method. Surface activation with N-hydroxysuccinimide and N-ethyl-N'-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (GE Healthcare Biosciences) was followed by an injection of RAD51 (30 µg/ml), which was diluted in 10 mM NaOAc (pH 4.7) prior to injection. Unliganded sites on the chip were then blocked with ethanolamine. A 100 µl (10 min) injection of RAD51 resulted in the immobilization of about 20 000 response units (RU) of RAD51. Subsequently, the interaction experiments were carried out in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM dithiothreitol, at a flow rate of 30 µl/min. A 30 µl (1 min) aliquot of each of the different concentrations of DIDS (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 µM) was injected onto the chip sequentially, without regeneration (kinetic titration). The baseline response of the non-treated surface of the chip was subtracted from the response obtained from the RAD51 surface. Kinetic parameters, such as ka and kd, were calculated with the Biacore T100 Evaluation Software (GE Healthcare Biosciences).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
DIDS is a potential inhibitor of RAD51-mediated strand exchange
To identify chemical compounds that affect the recombinase activity of RAD51, we employed the strand-exchange assay. In this assay, {phi}X174 phage circular ssDNA (5386 bases) and linearized {phi}X174 dsDNA (5386 base pairs) were used as DNA substrates, and the reactions were conducted in the presence of RPA. In this combination of DNA substrates, both intermediate (joint molecule; JM) and complete strand-exchange products (nicked circular; NC) were potentially detectable (Figure 1A). However, under the reaction conditions used in this study, only the JM product was detected, because 5% methanol (as a solvent for chemical compounds) and low concentrations of salt, which are not optimal for the reaction, were present in the reaction mixture (Figure 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. The strand-exchange assay with human RAD51. (A) A schematic diagram of the strand-exchange assay. (B) The strand exchange activity of RAD51 under the three different conditions. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (20 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (6 µM) at 37°C for 10 min. After this incubation, 2 µM RPA was added to the reaction mixture, which was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The reactions were then initiated by the addition of 20 µM {phi}X174 linear dsDNA. The DNA products were then deproteinized, and were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer at 3.3 V/cm for 4 h. The products were visualized by SYBR Gold (Invitrogen) staining. Joint molecules and nicked circular DNA are indicated by jm and nc, respectively. Lane 1 indicates a negative control experiment without RAD51. Lanes 2 and 3 indicate experiments with RAD51 in the absence and presence of 0.2 M KCl, respectively. Lane 4 indicates an experiment with 5% methanol in the absence of 0.2 M KCl.

 
We then performed the RAD51-mediated strand exchange in the presence of each of 185 chemical compounds, which were selected as potential antitumor chemical compounds by the program of Scientific Research on Priority Areas, Cancer, Japan (Supplementary Table 1). As shown in Figure 2A, most of the chemical compounds did not affect the RAD51-mediated strand exchange; however, we found that DIDS (Figure 2A, #137 and B) was a potential inhibitor for the RAD51-mediated strand exchange. Careful titration experiments confirmed that DIDS actually inhibited the RAD51-mediated strand exchange (Figure 3A and B). DIDS also inhibited the RAD51-mediated strand exchange under the conditions with 0.2 M KCl, which significantly stimulates the strand exchange (Figure 3C and D).


Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. The strand-exchange assay in the presence of chemical compounds. (A) Each chemical compound (10 µM, lanes 1–185) was incubated with RAD51 (6 µM), and the strand-exchange reaction was performed under the conditions containing 5% methanol at 37°C for 1 h with 20 µM ssDNA, 20 µM dsDNA and 2 µM RPA. Lanes C, R and M indicate negative control reactions without RAD51, complete reactions and complete reactions with 5% methanol, respectively. The chemical compounds are listed in Supplementary Table 1. (B) Structure of 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. DIDS efficiently inhibits RAD51-mediated strand exchange. (A) DIDS titration experiments in the absence of 0.2 M KCl. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (20 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (6 µM) in the presence of DIDS at 37°C for 10 min. After this incubation, 2 µM RPA was added to the reaction mixture, which was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The reactions were then initiated by the addition of 20 µM {phi}X174 linear dsDNA. The DNA products were then deproteinized, and were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer at 3.3 V/cm for 4 h. The products were visualized by SYBR Gold (Invitrogen) staining. Joint molecule is indicated by jm. Lane 1 indicates a negative control experiment without RAD51. Lane 2 indicates an experiment with RAD51 and 5% methanol in the absence of DIDS. DIDS concentrations were 0.01 µM (lane 3), 0.1 µM (lane 4), 1 µM (lane 5) and 10 µM (lane 6). Lane 7 indicates an experiment with 10 µM DIDS in the absence of RAD51. (B) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (A). The band intensities of the jm product were quantified as the peak volumes of densitometric scans. The jm peak volumes relative to that in the reaction without DIDS (A, lane 2) were plotted against the DIDS concentration. (C) The strand-exchange assay in the presence of 0.2 M KCl. Lane 1 indicates a negative control experiment without RAD51. Lanes 2 and 3 indicate control experiments without DIDS with RAD51 in the absence and presence of 5% methanol, respectively. DIDS concentrations were 0.01 µM (lane 4), 0.1 µM (lane 5), 1 µM (lane 6) and 10 µM (lane 7). Lane 8 indicates an experiment with 10 µM DIDS in the absence of RAD51. (D) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (C). The band intensities of the jm products were quantified as the peak volumes of densitometric scans. The jm peak volumes relative to that in the reaction without DIDS (C, lane 3) were plotted against the DIDS concentration.

 
We next tested whether the reaction order of the DIDS addition affected the strand-exchange inhibition. Time-course experiments were performed. Since we used 32P-labeled dsDNA in this assay, the JM products and dsDNA were detected using an FLA-7000 imaging analyzer (Fujifilm). As shown in Figure 4A and B, DIDS significantly inhibited the RAD51-mediated strand exchange, when it was added before the RAD51 was incubated with the ssDNA. DIDS moderately inhibited the strand exchange, when it was added after the RAD51was incubated with the ssDNA (just before RPA addition) (Figure 4C and D). Modest, but clear, inhibition was observed when DIDS was added before dsDNA (after RPA addition) (Figure 4E and F). Therefore, DIDS actually inhibits the RAD51-mediated strand exchange in various reaction orders, although the inhibition efficiencies depend on the reaction order.


Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. Effects of the DIDS reaction order on RAD51-mediated strand exchange. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (20 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (6 µM) at 37°C for 10 min. After this incubation, 2 µM RPA was added to the reaction mixture, which was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The reactions were then initiated by the addition of 20 µM {phi}X174 linear dsDNA containing 2 µM 32P-labeled {phi}X174 linear dsDNA, in the absence of 0.2 M KCl. The reactions were stopped and deproteinized at the indicated times, and the products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer at 3.3 V/cm for 4 h. The jm products and dsDNA labeled by 32P were visualized and quantified using an FLA-7000 imaging analyzer (Fujifilm). (A) RAD51 was incubated with DIDS (10 µM) at 37°C for 10 min. After the addition of the {phi}X174 circular ssDNA, RPA was added to the reaction mixture. The {phi}X174 linear dsDNA was then added to initiate the reaction. The reactions were continued for the indicated times. Lanes 1–4 indicate positive control experiments with RAD51 and 5% methanol. Lanes 5–8 indicate experiments with RAD51 and DIDS (and 5% methanol). Reaction times were 0 min (lanes 1 and 5), 30 min (lanes 2 and 6), 60 min (lanes 3 and 7) and 90 min (lanes 4 and 8). (B) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (A). Closed and open circles indicate experiments with and without DIDS, respectively. (C) RAD51 was incubated with the {phi}X174 circular ssDNA at 37°C for 10 min. After this incubation, DIDS (10 µM) was added, followed by the addition of RPA. The {phi}X174 linear dsDNA was then added to initiate the reaction. (D) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (C). Closed and open circles indicate experiments with and without DIDS, respectively. (E) RAD51 was incubated with the {phi}X174 circular ssDNA at 37°C for 10 min, and RPA was added. DIDS was added, and then {phi}X174 linear dsDNA was added to initiate the reaction. (F) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (E). Closed and open circles indicate experiments with and without DIDS, respectively.

 
DIDS inhibits homologous pairing by RAD51
We then tested whether DIDS inhibits homologous pairing by RAD51, because the homologous-pairing step needs to occur just before strand exchange. To do so, we performed the D-loop formation assay. In this assay, a 32P-labeled ssDNA 50-mer and superhelical dsDNA were used as substrates (Figure 5A), and the reactions were performed in the absence of RPA. As shown in Figure 5B and C, DIDS inhibited the RAD51-mediated D-loop formation in a concentration-dependent manner. These results indicated that DIDS inhibits homologous pairing, as well as strand exchange, by RAD51 in vitro.


Figure 5
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. DIDS inhibits homologous pairing by RAD51. (A) The D-loop formation assay. Asterisks indicate the 32P-labeled end of the ssDNA 50-mer. (B) The reactions were conducted with 0.1 µM RAD51 in the presence of increasing amounts of DIDS. Lanes 1 and 6 indicate negative control experiments without and with 10 µM DIDS in the absence of RAD51, respectively. Lane 2 indicates a positive control experiment with RAD51 in the presence of 5% methanol. Lanes 3–5 indicate experiments with RAD51 and DIDS. The DIDS concentrations were 0 µM (lanes 1 and 2), 0.1 µM (lane 3), 1 µM (lane 4) and 10 µM (lanes 5 and 6). (C) Graphic representation of the experiments shown in (B).

 
DIDS directly binds to RAD51
To determine whether DIDS directly binds to RAD51, we performed a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. As shown in Figure 6A, DIDS directly interacted with the RAD51-conjugated sensor chip. The association rate constant (ka) and the dissociation rate constant (kd) obtained from the sensorgram (Figure 6A) are 1 x 103 M–1s–1 and 2 x 10–3 s–1, respectively. Therefore, the KD value of the RAD51–DIDS interaction is 2 µM. The DIDS binding did not disrupt the RAD51 multimer, which eluted near the void volume from the Superdex 200 gel filtration column (Figure 6B). This RAD51 multimer is known to be disrupted by the BRC4 peptide (27), which binds to the RAD51–RAD51 interface (28–30). Therefore, DIDS may bind a different region than the BRC4-binding surface of RAD51.


Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 6. DIDS binds to RAD51 without interfering the RAD51 oligomerization. (A) SPR analysis. The RAD51-conjugated sensorchip was used. Sensorgram of a kinetic titration analysis between RAD51 and DIDS presented with a solid line. The DIDS concentrations were 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µM. DIDS (30 µl) was applied to the chip sequentially without regeneration. Kinetic parameters were obtained by curve fitting with a red line. (B) Gel filtration analysis. The left panel indicates the elution profile of RAD51 from the Superdex 200 column. The right panel indicates the elution profile of RAD51 previously incubated with 10 µM DIDS. The peak intensity of the RAD51–DIDS complex (right panel) was higher than that of RAD51 alone (left panel), because DIDS contains two aromatic rings.

 
DIDS inhibits the RAD51-DNA binding
We then examined whether DIDS affected the RAD51-DNA binding. Consistent with the results from the homologous-pairing and strand-exchange assays, DIDS significantly inhibited the ssDNA binding and dsDNA binding by RAD51 (Figure 7A and B). A 1 µM concentration of DIDS, which moderately inhibited strand exchange (Figure 3A and B), also moderately inhibited the RAD51-DNA binding, especially for the dsDNA (Figure 7B, lane 6). In addition, 10 µM DIDS, which significantly inhibited strand exchange (Figure 3A and B), also significantly inhibited both RAD51-ssDNA binding and RAD51-dsDNA binding (Figure 7A, lane 6 and B, lane 7). These inhibitory effects of DIDS on the RAD51-DNA binding did not depend on the presence of ATP or its analogs, AMPPNP and ATP{gamma}S (Figure 7C and D). In contrast, DIDS did not inhibit the RPA-ssDNA binding in the presence of 0.1–20 µM DIDS (Figure 7E). These results strongly suggested that DIDS inhibits the RAD51-mediated strand exchange by preventing RAD51-DNA binding, and not by inhibiting RPA-ssDNA binding, although RPA is required for the efficient promotion of the RAD51-mediated strand exchange.


Figure 7
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 7. DIDS inhibits DNA binding by RAD51. (A) The ssDNA-binding experiments in the presence of ATP. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (2 µM) in the presence of DIDS at 37°C for 15 min. The samples were analyzed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1x TAE buffer. The bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Lane 1 indicates a negative control experiment without RAD51. Lane 2 indicates an experiment with RAD51 alone. Lane 3 indicates an experiment with RAD51 and 5% methanol. DIDS concentrations were 0.1 µM (lane 4), 1 µM (lane 5), 10 µM (lane 6) and 20 µM (lane 7). Lane 8 indicates an experiment with 20 µM DIDS in the absence of RAD51. (B) The dsDNA-binding experiments in the presence of ATP. The linear {phi}X174 dsDNA (10 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (1 µM) in the presence of DIDS at 37°C for 15 min. Lane 1 indicates a negative control experiment without RAD51. Lane 2 indicates an experiment with RAD51 alone. Lane 3 indicates an experiment with RAD51 and 5% methanol. DIDS concentrations were 0.01 µM (lane 4), 0.1 µM (lane 5), 1 µM (lane 6) and 10 µM (lane 7). Lane 8 indicates an experiment with 10 µM DIDS in the absence of RAD51. (C) The ssDNA-binding experiments in the presence of ATP, AMPPNP and ATP{gamma}S. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (2 µM) at 37°C for 15 min. Lanes 1–4, lanes 5–8 and lanes 9–12 represent experiments with ATP, AMPPNP and ATP{gamma}S, respectively. Lanes 1, 5 and 9 indicate negative control experiments without RAD51. Lanes 2, 6 and 10 indicate experiments with RAD51 alone. Lanes 3, 7 and 11 indicate experiments with RAD51 and 5% methanol. Lanes 4, 8 and 12 indicate experiments with RAD51 and DIDS (20 µM). (D) The dsDNA-binding experiments in the presence of ATP, AMPPNP and ATP{gamma}S. The linear {phi}X174 dsDNA (10 µM) was incubated with RAD51 (1 µM) in the presence of DIDS at 37°C for 15 min. Lanes correspond to those in (C). The DIDS concentration was 10 µM. (E) Effect of DIDS on the ssDNA binding of RPA. The {phi}X174 circular ssDNA (40 µM) was incubated with RPA (0.5 µM) in the presence of DIDS at 37°C for 15 min. Lanes 1 and 8 indicate negative control experiments without RPA. Lanes 2 and 3 indicate experiments with RPA in the absence and presence of 5% methanol, respectively. The DIDS concentrations were 0.1 µM (lane 4), 1 µM (lane 5), 10 µM (lane 6) and 20 µM (lanes 7 and 8). (F) The ssDNA-binding and dsDNA-binding experiments with RAD51 were performed in the presence of methanol. Lanes 1–6 and lanes 7–12 indicate experiments with ssDNA and dsDNA, respectively. Lanes 1, 6, 7 and 12 are negative controls without RAD51, and lanes 2 and 8 are positive controls with RAD51 in the absence of methanol. Methanol concentrations were 2.5% (lanes 3 and 9), 5% (lanes 4 and 10) and 10% (lanes 5, 6, 11 and 12).

 
DIDS stimulates the ATP hydrolyzing activity of RAD51 in the absence of DNA
RAD51 hydrolyzes ATP in the presence of ssDNA or higher concentrations of salt (1.5 M NaCl) (31). In contrast, RAD51 does not efficiently hydrolyze ATP without DNA under low salt conditions. Interestingly, under the conditions without DNA and high salt, 10 µM DIDS stimulated ATP hydrolysis by RAD51 (Figure 8A). This may imply that DIDS binds near the DNA binding site of RAD51 and stimulates the ATPase activity. If so, then the DIDS may compete with ssDNA for RAD51 binding, and may inhibit the ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis by RAD51, once the ATP hydrolyzing reaction has commenced. As shown in Figure 8B, the progress of the ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis reaction by RAD51 was clearly inhibited just after the addition of DIDS (30 min). Therefore, DIDS may bind to a region close to the DNA binding site(s) of RAD51, and directly compete with DNA for RAD51 binding.


Figure 8
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 8. RAD51-mediated ATP hydrolysis with DIDS. (A) Open and closed circles indicate positive and negative control experiments without DIDS, in the presence and absence of ssDNA (40 µM), respectively. Closed squares indicate the experiments with DIDS (10 µM) in the absence of ssDNA. The averages of three independent experiments are represented with standard deviation values. (B) DIDS (20 µM) was added at 30 min after the ATP hydrolyzing reaction was initiated. Reactions were conducted at 37°C in the presence of ssDNA (40 µM). Closed and open circles indicate experiments with 5% methanol and DIDS, respectively. (C) Five percent methanol did not affect the ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis by RAD51. Closed and open circles indicate experiments without and with 5% methanol, respectively.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Increased expression of RAD51 has been reported in immortalized and tumor cells (32), and chromosome rearrangements, probably resulting from the enhanced homologous recombination, are found in these cells. Consistently, the overexpression of RAD51 enhances cell growth and gene targeting in mouse hybridoma cells (33), and promotes aneuploidy and multiple chromosomal rearrangements in mouse embryonic stem cells (34). RAD51 overexpression also contributes to chemoresistance in human soft tissue sarcoma cells (35). BRCA1 is involved in the HRR pathway. Intriguingly, RAD51 overexpression bypasses BRCA1 function in BRCA1-deficient cells, and up-regulation of RAD51 was found in BRCA1-deficient tumors (36). In addition, constitutive phosphorylation of the RAD51-Tyr315 residue in leukemia cells enhanced the recombination activity, which induces chromosomal translocation (16). These data strongly suggest that an elevated RAD51 level and/or activity causes genome instability and tumor progression.

To identify chemical compounds that suppress the recombinase activity of RAD51, we performed the RAD51-mediated strand-exchange assay in the presence of each of 185 chemical compounds, which were selected as potential antitumor chemical compounds by the program of Scientific Research on Priority Areas, Cancer, Japan. We found that DIDS significantly inhibits both homologous pairing and strand exchange by RAD51 in vitro, probably by inhibiting the DNA-binding activity of RAD51. The BRC4 polypeptide derived from BRCA2 is known to inhibit DNA binding by RAD51 (28). This polypeptide directly binds to RAD51 at the monomer–monomer interface of the RAD51 filament, and disassembles the filament (27–30). Our SPR analysis revealed that DIDS also directly binds to RAD51. In contrast to the BRC4 polypeptide, a gel filtration analysis revealed that DIDS did not disrupt the RAD51 multimer, which is known to be disrupted by the BRC4 polypeptide (27). Therefore, DIDS may bind to a different RAD51 surface from the BRC4-binding region.

Our results presented here suggest that DIDS may bind near the DNA binding sites of RAD51. In addition, we found that DIDS inhibits the RAD51-dsDNA binding more efficiently than the RAD51-ssDNA binding. This fact implies that DIDS may bind to the secondary DNA binding site specific for dsDNA within the RAD51 filament (37–40). Another possibility is that DIDS may bind to the dsDNA-binding path, which may function to guide DNA into the RAD51 filament. Previously, we and others proposed that the N-terminal domain of RAD51 (as well as that of a meiosis-specific homologue, DMC1) constitutes such a dsDNA-binding path (37–42). We found that 50% inhibition of the RAD51-mediated strand exchange was observed at a ratio of about 1–2 µM DIDS to 6 µM RAD51, suggesting the binding of approximately 1 DIDS per turn of the RAD51 filament. Therefore, DIDS may inhibit the dsDNA binding to the RAD51 filament on the dsDNA-binding path that runs between two consecutive N-terminal domains in the filament structure. Further structural studies will be required to understand the molecular mechanism of the DIDS-mediated alteration of the RAD51 activities.

DIDS reportedly binds to the outer cell membrane surface, and inhibits Cl– channels (43). However, no DIDS function in the nucleus has been reported, thus far. We confirmed that DIDS was efficiently imported into the nuclei of human cultured cells (H.S. and S.T. unpublished results). Actually, DIDS was toxic for the cultured cells (H.S. and S.T. unpublished results), and thus it was difficult to evaluate the contribution of the DIDS-mediated RAD51 suppression, because of its cytotoxicity. Therefore, DIDS may be a potential lead compound for developing RAD51-specific anticancer drugs. Jayathilaka et al. (44) reported that 3-[(benzylamino)sulfonyl]-4-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)benzamide (RS-1) stimulated RAD51 activity. RS-1 also directly binds to RAD51, but, in contrast to DIDS, it stabilizes the RAD51-DNA binding. These two chemical compounds, DIDS and RS-1, which have opposite effects on the RAD51 activity, may have broad potential applications in both research and medical settings.


   SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.


   FUNDING
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
REFERENCES
 
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; Chemical compounds: Scientific Research on Priority Areas, Cancer, Japan. Funding for open access charge: Waseda University.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Whitaker SJ. DNA damage by drugs and radiation: what is important and how is it measured? Eur. J. Cancer (1992) 28:273–276.[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuzer KN, Sherratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature (2000) 404:37–41.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Symington LS. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. (2002) 66:630–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. West SC. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. (2003) 4:435–445.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  5. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (2008) 77:229–257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  6. Sung P, Krejci L, Van Komen S, Sehorn MG. Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators. J. Biol. Chem. (2003) 278:42729–42732.[Free Full Text]

  7. Lim D-S, Hasty P. A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53. Mol. Cell Biol. (1996) 16:7133–7143.[Abstract]

  8. Tsuzuki T, Fujii Y, Sakumi K, Tominaga Y, Nakao K, Sekiguchi M, Matsushiro A, Yoshimura Y, Morita T. Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93:6236–6240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde J-M, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Takata M, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takeda S. Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. EMBO J. (1998) 17:598–608.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  10. Kato M, Yano K, Matsuo F, Saito H, Katagiri T, Kurumizaka H, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, et al. Identification of Rad51 alteration in patients with bilateral breast cancer. J. Hum. Genet. (2000) 45:133–137.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  11. Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A, Eisenberg S, Dagan E, Paperna T, Kasinetz L, Catane R, Kaufman B, Beller U, Renbaum P, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 but not BRCA1 carriers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98:3232–3236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Wang WW, Spurdle AB, Kolachana P, Bove B, Modan B, Ebbers SM, Suthers G, Tucker MA, Kaufman DJ, Doody MM, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region of RAD51 and risk of cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. (2001) 10:955–960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Blasiak J, Przybylowska K, Czechowska A, Zadrozny M, Pertynski T, Rykala J, Kolacinska A, Morawiec Z, Drzewoski J. Analysis of the G/C polymorphism in the 5'-untranslated region of the RAD51 gene in breast cancer. Acta Biochim Pol. (2003) 50:249–253.[Web of Science][Medline]

  14. Jakubowska A, Narod SA, Goldgar DE, Mierzejewski M, Masoj B, Nej K, Huzarska J, Byrski T, Górski B, Lubinski J. Breast cancer risk reduction associated with the RAD51 polymorphism among carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Poland. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. (2003) 12:457–459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Ishida T, Takizawa Y, Sakane I, Kurumizaka H. Altered DNA binding by the human Rad51-R150Q mutant found in breast cancer patients. Biol. Pharm. Bull. (2007) 30:1374–1378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  16. Slupianek A, Schmutte C, Tombline G, Nieborowska-Skorska M, Hoser G, Nowicki MO, Pierce AJ, Fishel R, Skorski T. BCR/ABL regulates mammalian RecA homologs, resulting in drug resistance. Mol. Cell (2001) 8:795–806.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  17. Sung P. Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science (1994) 265:1241–1243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Sung P, Robberson DL. DNA strand exchange mediated by a RAD51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament with polarity opposite to that of RecA. Cell (1995) 82:453–461.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  19. Baumann P, Benson FE, West SC. Human Rad51 protein promotes ATP-dependent homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Cell (1996) 87:757–766.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  20. Maeshima K, Morimatsu K, Horii T. Purification and characterization of XRad51.1 protein, Xenopus RAD51 homologue: recombinant XRad51.1 promotes strand exchange reaction. Genes Cells (1996) 1:1057–1068.[Abstract]

  21. Gupta RC, Bazemore LR, Golub EI, Radding CM. Activities of human recombination protein Rad51. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1997) 94:463–468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. Matsuo Y, Sakane I, Takizawa Y, Takahashi M, Kurumizaka H. Roles of the human Rad51 L1 and L2 loops in DNA binding. FEBS J. (2006) 273:3148–3159.[CrossRef][Medline]

  23. Henricksen LA, Umbricht CB, Wold MS. Recombinant replication protein A: expression, complex formation, and functional characterization. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269:11121–11132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. (1976) 72:248–254.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  25. Kagawa W, Kurumizaka H, Ikawa S, Yokoyama S, Shibata T. Homologous pairing promoted by the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. (2001) 276:35201–35208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Kagawa W, Kagawa A, Saito K, Ikawa S, Shibata T, Kurumizaka H, Yokoyama S. Identification of a second DNA binding site in the human Rad52 protein. J. Biol. Chem. (2008) 283:24264–24273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Nomme J, Takizawa Y, Martinez SF, Renodon-Cornière A, Fleury F, Weigel P, Yamamoto K, Kurumizaka H, Takahashi M. Inhibition of filament formation of human Rad51 protein by a small peptide derived from the BRC-motif of the BRCA2 protein. Genes Cells (2008) 13:471–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Davies AA, Masson JY, McIlwraith MJ, Stasiak AZ, Stasiak A, Venkitaraman AR, West SC. Role of BRCA2 in control of the RAD51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol. Cell (2001) 7:273–282.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  29. Pellegrini L, Yu DS, Lo T, Anand S, Lee M, Blundell TL, Venkitaraman AR. Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51-BRCA2 complex. Nature (2002) 420:287–293.[CrossRef][Medline]

  30. Galkin VE, Esashi F, Yu X, Yang S, West SC, Egelman EH. BRCA2 BRC motifs bind RAD51-DNA filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2005) 102:8537–8542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Ishida T, Takizawa Y, Sakane I, Kurumizaka H. The Lys313 residue of the human Rad51 protein negatively regulates the strand-exchange activity. Genes Cells (2008) 13:91–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Klein HL. The consequences of Rad51 overexpression for normal and tumor cells. DNA Repair (2008) 7:686–693.[CrossRef][Medline]

  33. Ruksc A, Birmingham EC, Baker MD. Altered DNA repair and recombination responses in mouse cells expressing wildtype or mutant forms of RAD51. DNA Repair (2007) 6:1876–1889.[CrossRef][Medline]

  34. Richardson C, Stark JM, Ommundsen M, Jasin M. Rad51 overexpression promotes alternative double-strand break repair pathways and genome instability. Oncogene (2004) 23:546–553.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  35. Hannay JA, Liu J, Zhu QS, Bolshakov SV, Li L, Pisters PW, Lazar AJ, Yu D, Pollock RE, Lev D. Rad51 overexpression contributes to chemoresistance in human soft tissue sarcoma cells: a role for p53/activator protein 2 transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cancer Ther. (2007) 6:1650–1660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Martin RW, Orelli BJ, Yamazoe M, Minn AJ, Takeda S, Bishop DK. RAD51 up-regulation bypasses BRCA1 function and is a common feature of BRCA1-deficient breast tumors. Cancer Res. (2007) 67:9658–9665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Aihara H, Ito Y, Kurumizaka H, Yokoyama S, Shibata T. The N-terminal domain of the human Rad51 protein binds DNA: structure and a DNA binding surface as revealed by NMR. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 290:495–504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  38. Zhang XP, Lee KI, Solinger JA, Kiianitsa K, Heyer WD. Gly-103 in the N-terminal domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein is critical for DNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. (2005) 280:26303–26311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Shin DS, Pellegrini L, Daniels DS, Yelent B, Craig L, Bates D, Yu DS, Shivji MK, Hitomi C, Arvai AS, et al. Full-length archaeal Rad51 structure and mutants: mechanisms for RAD51 assembly and control by BRCA2. EMBO J. (2003) 22:4566–4576.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  40. Chen L-T, Ko T-P, Chang Y-W, Lin K-A, Wang AH-J, Wang T-F. Structural and functional analyses of five conserved positively charged residues in the L1 and N-terminal DNA binding motifs of archaeal RadA protein. PLoS One (2007) 9:1–11.

  41. Hikiba J, Hirota K, Kagawa W, Ikawa S, Kinebuchi T, Sakane I, Takizawa Y, Yokoyama S, Mandon-Pépin B, Nicolas A, et al. Structural and functional analyses of the DMC1-M200V polymorphism found in the human population. Nucleic Acids Res. (2008) 36:4181–4190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Hikiba J, Takizawa Y, Ikawa S, Shibata T, Kurumizaka H. Biochemical analysis of the human DMC1-I37N polymorphism. FEBS J. (2009) 276:457–465.[CrossRef][Medline]

  43. Macara IG, Cantley LC. Interactions between transport inhibitors at the anion binding sites of the band 3 dimer. Biochemistry (1981) 20:5095–5105.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  44. Jayathilaka K, Sheridan SD, Bold TD, Bochenska K, Logan HL, Weichselbaum RR, Bishop DK, Connell PP. A chemical compound that stimulates the human homologous recombination protein RAD51. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2008) 105:15848–15853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (4515K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (535K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/10/3367    most recent
gkp200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurumizaka, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurumizaka, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?