Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on January 19, 2009
Nucleic Acids Research 2009 37(5):1663-1671; doi:10.1093/nar/gkn1080
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (3983K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (440K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/5/1663    most recent
gkn1080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcucci, R.
Right arrow Articles by Baralle, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcucci, R.
Right arrow Articles by Baralle, F. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 5 1663-1671
© 2009 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


RNA

Dissecting the splicing mechanism of the Drosophila editing enzyme; dADAR

Roberto Marcucci1, Maurizio Romano1,2, Fabian Feiguin1, Mary A. O'Connell3 and Francisco E. Baralle1,*

1International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Padriciano 99, I-34012, 2Department of Physiology and Pathology, University of Trieste, Via A. Fleming 22, 34127, Trieste, Italy and 3MRC Human Genetics Unit Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2X U, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 040 3757337; Fax: +39 040 3757361; Email: baralle{at}icgeb.org

Received September 11, 2008. Revised December 19, 2008. Accepted December 23, 2008.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In Drosophila melanogaster, the expression of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA is regulated by transcription and alternative splicing so that at least four different isoforms are generated that have a tissue-specific splicing pattern. Even though dAdar has been extensively studied, the complete adult expression pattern has yet to be elucidated. In the present study, we investigate mature transcripts of dAdar arising from different promoters. Two predominant isoforms of dAdar are expressed in gonads and dAdar is transcribed from both the embryonic and the adult promoters. Furthermore, full-length transcripts containing the alternatively spliced exon-1 are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The splicing factor B52/SRp55 binds within the alternative spliced exon 3a and plays a role in this alternative splicing event.

Drosophila adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (dAdar) is an RNA editing enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine. Inosine base pairs with cytosine and is translated as if it were guanosine. Therefore, RNA editing can alter the codon composition and thereby increase the coding capacity of the RNA (1). Alternative splicing and RNA editing are the main pathways which increase proteome complexity post-transcriptionally. Editing can alter the protein coding sequence, thereby affecting the function of the protein or affect the splicing of pre-mRNA (2–4). It can also influence its own protein expression such as in the negative autoregulation of rodent ADAR2 (4) and Drosophila Adar (5). Moreover, the loss of Adar activity has been shown to be important for normal behavior both in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila (6) and to be critical for mouse development (7,8).

Drosophila Adar lies at the tip of the X chromosome within a region that resides in an ecdysone inducible chromosomal puff. Enhanced transcription from the 4A promoter was observed during pupal development and proposed to be due to an increase in ecdysone levels (9). In adult flies, the ovary and the supporting cells of the oocyte were shown to be the major steroidogenic tissue. (10).

There are multiple promoters for the dAdar gene. Expression occurs from the 4A promoter during all the stages of development, whereas 4B is only actively transcribed from the pupal stage and in adults. The mRNAs that are expressed encode a complex combination of alternative spliced isoforms (9). There are two mutually excluded alternatively spliced exons, -4a, and -4b at the 5'-end, in addition to alternatively spliced exons -1 and exon 3a. Exon 3a arises from the extension of exon 3 due to the selection of a distal non-canonical GC at the 5' splice site. Inclusion or exclusion of exon 3a changes the spacing between the dsRNA binding domain of dADAR resulting in altered binding capability on the dsRNA targets (11). In addition, transcripts including 3a exon were shown in vivo to lack self-editing of exon 7 that lies within the deaminase domain. By editing its own transcript, dADAR generates an enzyme that is catalytically less active (5). The biological function of alternative exon-1 has yet to be determined.

Members of SR family of proteins have been shown to be required for splice site selection. Here, we identify a binding site for B52/SRp55 within exon 3a of dAdar and demonstrate its role in splicing this exon. In Drosophila, B52/SRp55 was shown to control eye development and to regulate the alternative splicing of many transcripts involved in brain organogenesis (12,13).

To date, all known transcripts that are edited by ADARs have been detected in the CNS (14). Although editing in Drosophila occurs primarily in adult nervous system, ADAR is expressed in other organs and the complete adult expression pattern has not been defined. In this article, we investigate the expression pattern and the alternative splicing of dAdar in the gonads. dAdar is expressed from both the early and late promoter and there is a tissue-specific inclusion of exon-1.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Primers
dAdar Exon 2 sense

5'-TACACGCACCTCTATTCACG-3'

dAdar Exon 4 antisense

5'-TGACCGTCAACAGTAATAGC-3'

dAdar Exon -4a sense

5'-TCAATAATTAGAGCAAAAAG-3'

dAdar Exon -4b sense

5'-GTGTGTAGTGCACTTTTGGCCAGCC-3'

rp 49 sense

5'-GCGGGTGCGCTTGTTCGATCC-3'

rp 49 antisense

5'-CCAAGGACTTCATCCGCCACC-3'

egl Exon 2 sense

5'-TGACGTTCGTCTTCTTCCTGG-3'

egl Exon 4 antisense

5'- ATCCGTCATGTTCTCGCAGCC-3'

B52/SRp55 Binding site WT sense 5'-GAATTAATAC

GACTCACTATAGGGAGACTACCTCGCTT

GAACAACCCACGTTTTGCATGAGTCAG-3'

B52/SRp55 binding site WT as 5'-TCTGACTCATGCAAAACGTGGGTTGTTCAAGCGAGGTAG-3'

B52/SRp55 Binding site MUT sense 5'-GAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACTACCTCGCTTGTACATCTCACTTTTTTTCATCAGTCAGA-3'

B52/SRp55 Binding site MUT antisense

5'-TCTGACTCATGAAAAAAGTGAGATGT ACAAGCGAGGTAG-3'

T7 B52/SRp55 dsRNA sense 5'-GAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACATCAAAAATGGCTACGGCT-3'

T7 B52/SRp55 dsRNA as 5'-GAATTAATACGACTC ACTATAGGGAGAAGCTCGGTGTCATCCAACTT-3'

Preparation of RNA templates for pull-down and dsRNA experiments
RNA templates for pull-down experiments were made by annealing the oligonucleotides listed above, that encode a T7 polymerase sequence followed by either the wild-type or mutant binding site for B52/SRp55. The annealed oligos were then transcribed with T7 RNA Polymerase (Stratagene) as previously described (15). Two specific oligonucleotides also containing a T7 polymerase sequence were used to amplify 426 bp of B52/SRp55 with cDNA from S2 cells for the dsRNA experiment. The amplified product was then purified and ~5 µg of DNA was transcribed with T7 Megascript kit (Ambion). The two RNA strands were annealed in 100 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM MgCl2 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol by incubating at 65°C for 20 min followed by a slow cooling to room temperature.

Drosophila stock
All RT–PCR experiments were performed with Oregon R flies, obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. The stock was maintained on standard cornmeal–agar medium at 25°C. Ovaries, oocytes and testes were meticulously dissected in 1x PBS for the light microscopy studies (see Supplementary material), and images were taken with the stereo microscope (Leica 12MZ 125).

Cell culture, transfections and RNAi experiment
Drosophila S2 cell lines were cultured in Schneider's Drosophila media (GIBCO) with glutamax (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and gentamicin (100 mg/ml) at room temperature. For the RNAi experiments, 15 µg of dsRNA specific for B52/SRp55 were transfected into S2 cells that were plated at 1 x 106/well in six-well culture dishes with Fugene 6 Transfection Reagent (Roche). The cells were maintained in culture for 3 days before RNA was extracted.

RNA extraction and RT–PCR
Total RNA was prepared with TRI Reagent (Sigma Aldrich) from cultured S2 cells or from homogenized samples that had been dissected from flies. cDNA was synthesized with First Strand cDNA kit (Amersham Pharmacia) with random-hexamer primers. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. To amplify the alternative spliced region within exon 3/3a, RT–PCR was performed with dAdar exon 2 as sense primer, and dAdar exon 4 as antisense primer. To amplify the dAdar -4a/-4b spliced region, primer specific for either exon -4a or -4b were used as sense primer and exon 4 as antisense.

The PCR conditions were the following: 94°C for 3 min for the initial denaturation, 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 50 s for 35 cycles and 72°C for 7 min for the final extension. The PCRs were optimized to be in the exponential phase of amplification. The results of the transfections represent at least three independent experiments. The relative amount of different splice variants was quantified by optical densitometry with ImageJ software (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2004). Data were expressed as percentage of mean and SD. The significance of differences was determined by Student's t-test and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RNA affinity purification and western blot analysis
RNA affinity purification was performed as previously described (16). The immunoblots were hybridized with mouse anti-SR antibody 1H4 (Zymed Laboratories) and revealed with chemilumiscent detection of HRP (ECL detection kit; Amersham-Pharmacia) followed by exposure to X-ray film (Kodak X-OMAT AR).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Alternative splicing of exon 3/3a of dAdar in tagmata
Exon 3 of dAdar undergoes alternative splicing due to the presence of two competing 5' donor splice sites (5'ss), a strong proximal consensus GT, followed by a distal non-canonical GC. The consequence of differential 5'ss choice is that two isoforms are produced. Selection of the proximal donor site results in the generation of a short isoform, whereas the selection of the distal site produces the longer transcript that extends exon 3 and generates the alternative exon 3a isoform (Figure 1a).


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. RT-PCR splicing pattern and tagmata expression of dAdar exon 3/3a. (a) Schematic representation of the D. melanogaster Adar (CG12{per ten thousand}598) transcription unit in the region of alternative spliced exon 3/3a. Introns are shown as lines and exons as boxes. The alternative spliced exon 3a is represented as a gray box. The dinucleotides of the proximal and distal 5'ss are in bold and some of the intervening sequence of exon 3a is shown. (b) RT–PCR analysis of the alternative splicing pattern of dAdar exon 3/3a from heads, thorax, legs and abdomens of Oregon R males and females adult flies (M, F). The gray arrows show the relative location of the primers used in the RT–PCR reaction. The two black arrows indicate the alternative spliced products generated in the RT–PCR reaction, either including or excluding exon 3a. In the lower panel, a black arrowheads mark the position of rp49 that is used as an internal control. (c) Detection by RT–PCR of the splicing pattern of dAdar exon 3/3a expressed in testis and ovaries (lanes 1 and 3, respectively). Lanes 2 and 4 represent the controls obtained from the male fly bodies without testis and the female bodies without ovaries. Expected band size for the longer transcript that includes exon 3a was 346 bp and for the splice product excluding 3a was 235 bp. Lane M is the 1 Kb plus DNA marker. The stacked column charts below the gels show the relative percentage of amount of exon 3a/3 spliced isoforms quantified by optical densitometry. Gray columns indicate the exon 3a percentile, while white columns indicate the exon 3 percentile. Percentage was measured from three independent experiments; average with SD is shown.

 
RT–PCR analysis was performed to determine if there is expression of dAdar transcripts containing exon 3a in the tagmata of flies. Total RNA was prepared from the head, thorax, leg and abdomen of adult male and female Oregon R flies. RT–PCR analysis was performed with specific primers in exon 2 and 4 that were located close to the region of interest (Figure 1b). As shown in Figure1b, the head, thorax and leg of both male and female displayed the same splicing profile. In particular, the spliced variant that includes exon 3a was expressed at a lower level in comparison to the main transcript that excludes it (Figure 1b, lanes 1–6). However, in both male and female abdomens the opposite was observed and expression of the transcript containing 3a was the major isoform (Figure 1b, lanes 7 and 8). Therefore, these results demonstrate that the alternative splicing of exon 3/3a of dAdar in the tagmata is regulated.

The adult abdomen has a different embryological origin from the rest of the body as it is derived from nests of histoblasts located in the embryonic and larval epidermis. This is also the compartment where the gonads are located. Therefore, we investigated the alternative splicing of Adar within the abdomen. Abdomens were microdissected and the testis and ovary were isolated. By RT–PCR analysis, we found the same splicing pattern as previously observed for the whole abdomen of the flies (Figure 1c, lanes 1 and 3). The expression pattern of dAdar exon 3/3a transcripts from the body of flies without the testis or ovaries was analyzed as a control. As it is clearly shown in Figure 1c, the gonads have a specific splicing profile that is distinct from the bodies, suggesting that dAdar transcripts containing exon 3a are mainly expressed in Drosophila gonads.

Alternative splicing of dAdar in Drosophila gonads
Transcripts of dAdar originate from either an embryonic or an adult promoter and this generates mRNAs with two mutually excluded exons, -4a and -4b at the 5'-end, together with a complex combination of spliced isoforms. Four major isoforms were shown to be expressed from the early promoter (4A) that correspond to either the inclusion or exclusion of the alternative exons -1 and 3a. However, from the late promoter (4B), only two isoforms are transcribed. By alternative splicing exon -1 is either included or excluded, whereas exon 3a is always skipped (Figure 2) (9).


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Schematic organization of the dAdar gene from the transcriptional start sites to the end of exon 4. (a) Schematic representation of the dAdar gene encompassing the region from the two promoter to the end of exon 4. In the article, to avoid confusion, we refer to the promoter with capital letters (4A and 4B), whereas -4a and -4b are the mutually excluded exons. Exons are shown as boxes and introns as black lines. The black and gray arrowheads mark the position of the embryonic (4A) and adult (4B) transcriptional start sites. The black and gray dashed lines indicate the pattern of alternative splicing that arise from the mutually excluded alternative spliced exons -4a and -4b. The two other alternative spliced exon (-1 and 3a) are indicated by a black and gray box respectively. (b and c) Diagrams of the alternative splicing composition of the main spliced variants that arise from the embryonic and adult promoters.

 
We have analyzed the splice site selection and tissue-specific expression of the two mutually excluded alternatively spliced exons, -4a -4b in the testis and ovaries. Promoter-specific transcripts were amplified with primers annealing specifically to the end of either exon -4b or -4a (Figure 3). RT–PCR analysis of exon -4b containing transcripts from the testis and ovaries displayed no major differences to their respective body controls either including or excluding exon -1 (Figure 3a, upper panel, lanes 1–4). However, transcripts containing both exon -4a and exon 3a (Figure 3a, lower panel, lanes 5 and 6) were enriched in the testis and ovaries. The alternative exon -1 was expressed in a tissue-specific manner being more abundant in the ovaries than in the testis (Figure 3a, lanes 5 and 6). Direct sequencing of the RT–PCR products confirmed the exon composition. As expected, the bodies of the flies previously used as controls express almost exclusively the two isoforms lacking exon 3a (Figure 3a, lanes 7 and 8).


Figure 3
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Promoter choice of dAdar and analysis of alternative splice pattern in gonads. (a) In the upper panel, RT–PCR analysis of the adult -4b alternative splicing pattern that is expressed in the testis and ovary (lanes 1 and 2) and the corresponding controls (lanes 3 and 4) is shown. In the lower panel is the RT–PCR of the -4a alternative splicing pattern expressed in testis and ovary (lanes 5 and 6), and the corresponding controls (lanes 7 and 8). A diagram of the alternative spliced isoforms are shown on the left with their exon composition and the black and gray boxes indicate the alternative spliced exons -1 and 3a. Exon -1 is expressed in a tissue-specific manner and is found in the ovary. The splicing pattern of dAdar transcripts in testis and ovary (lanes 5–8) is the inverse to their controls (lanes 7 and 8). The gray arrows indicate the relative location of the primers used in the RT–PCR. The expected band size for the -4b-Ex4 transcripts is 615 bp and 575 bp, respectively. The expected band size for the -4a-Ex4 transcripts is 608 bp for the full length, 568 bp (excluding exon-1) 497bp (excluding exon 3a) and 457bp (excluding exon-1 and exon3a). (b) A time course performed by RT–PCR of the expression pattern of dAdar exon3/3a from male and female gonads. (c) A time course of the alternative splicing pattern of -4a exon from male and female gonads analyzed by RT–PCR. Black arrowheads indicate the position of the constitutively expressed rp49 rRNA used as an internal control in the lower panels of (a), (b) and (c). The stacked column charts below the gels show the relative percentage of the spliced isoforms that was quantified by optical densitometry. On the left of each column chart, a color key indicates the different alternative spliced isoforms. The quantification was performed on three independent experiments and the average with SD is shown.

 
In summary, these results demonstrate that in ovaries there is a coordinated inclusion of both exon -1 and 3a when the upstream -4a exon is chosen.

dAdar exon -4a containing transcripts are developmentally expressed in Drosophila ovaries
The dAdar gene lies in an ecdysone inducible chromosomal puff and an increase in dAdar transcript levels is observed during the pupal stage (9). Moreover, significant levels of ecdysone are found in adult females and the nurse cells that are the supporting cells of the oocyte, are the major steroidogenic tissue (10).

Light microscopy images of Drosophila ovaries at days 1, 3, 5 and 10, show that in the ovary there is an increase in the number of mature oocytes and consequently the number of nurse cells from eclosion through to day 10 (Supplementary Figure S1). Therefore, exon 3a could be differently expressed in the adult females during this developmental stage in the ovary. To test this hypothesis, we microdissected the ovary and testis and analyzed the splicing pattern of exon 3/3a by RT–PCR. This time-course analysis revealed a significant increase in the spliced variants containing exon 3a in the gonads by day 3 (Figure 3b). This increased inclusion of the exon 3a in ovaries and testis suggests an enhanced activity from the early -4A promoter. Indeed a time-dependent increase in the length of transcripts encoding exon 3a was observed in the ovary but not in the testis (Figure 3c). In contrast, we did not observe any substantial change in the splicing pattern when we analyzed the transcripts that arise from the adult 4B promoter (Supplementary Figure S2). These experiments suggest that promoter choice dictates splice site preference in ovaries.

Expression of dAdar spliced isoforms 3/3a during oocyte development
Transcripts of dAdat1, a specific tRNA editing enzyme was shown to be produced by nurse cells and then loaded into the egg before fertilization (17). To determine if dAdar behaves in a similar manner its expression was analyzed during oocyte development.

Each ovary is composed of 16 ovarioles, in which the developing oocyte starts its differentiation in the germarium to generate an unfertilized egg after maturation. The ovary was dissected and RNA isolated from the germarium that included the earliest stages of the oocytes development; stages 4–8, stages 10 and 11 as well as mature unfertilized eggs (Supplementary Figure S3).

Expression of the Egalitarian gene was analyzed as a positive control (Figure 4a, lower panel), as it is expressed from the earliest stages of oogenesis and is required for oocyte specification in the germarium (18). RT–PCR analysis revealed that transcripts that both include and exclude 3a are expressed from early stages of oocyte formation and are detected during oocyte development (Figure 4a, upper panel). Furthermore exon -4a was also detected during these development stages of oogenesis (Figure 4b).


Figure 4
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. dAdar expression during the oocyte development. In (a and b) RT–PCR of dAdar in oocytes undergoing maturation to unfertilized mature eggs is shown. The alternative spliced region exon 3/3a and transcripts originating from the 4A promoter were amplified. The gray arrows indicate the relative location of the primers used in the RT–PCR reactions. St.4-8 and St.10-11 are the oocytes stages from which total RNA was prepared and RT–PCR analysis was performed. Black arrowheads indicate the mRNA of the constitutively expressed egalitarian gene (Egl) which was used as an internal control. The stacked column charts below the gels show the relative percentage of the spliced isoforms quantified by optical densitometry. On the left site of each column chart, the color key indicates the different alternative spliced isoforms. The quantification was performed on three independent experiments and the average with SD is shown.

 
Exon 3a contains a binding site for the SR proteins B52/SRp55
B52 is the SRp55 homologue in D. melanogaster. B52/SRp55 is an essential splicing factor required for Drosophila development and it is known to regulate the splicing mechanism of many transcripts involved in brain organogenesis (12,13). The RNA binding consensus sequence for B52/SRp55 has been previously identified (19). The predicted secondary structure for the B52/SRp55 binding site is a hairpin structure with a guanosine residue at the +8 position that is crucial to maintain its structure (19). We found that this motif with the guanosine residue almost perfectly matched a sequence within exon 3a of dAdar (Figure 5a). The predicted secondary structure for the putative B52/SRp55 binding site within dAdar exon 3a suggests that its binding motif lies in a loop and the +8 guanosine residue mimics its important role in maintaining the hairpin structure (Figure 5b).


Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Exon 3a binds the alternative splicing factor B52/SRp55. (a) Schematic representation of the dAdar region encompassing exon 3/3a showing a partial sequence of exon 3a that includes the B52/SRp55 binding site. (1) The RNA sequence found by SELEX as a high affinity binding site for B52/SRp55. (2) The RNA sequence of dAdar exon 3a used for the RNA affinity technique. This RNAs contains the conserved consensus motif for B52/SRp55 and this is shown in bold. (3) (c) Left panel, RNA-affinity purification of proteins bound to RNA encoding either wild type or mutated exon 3a. Right panel, Western blot analysis of the bound proteins with 1H4 monoclonal antibody. The black arrow indicates phosphorylated B52/SRp55 that is present in S2 nuclear extract. The Beads lane is the negative control. The protein gel in the left panel is stained with Coomassie Blue to visualize the pulled down RNA protein complexes and is a loading control for the experiment.

 
To assess whether the B52/SRp55 is able to interact with this putative binding motif, we performed an RNA affinity purification followed by western blot analysis. The substrates used were either in vitro transcribed dAdar RNA containing exon 3a or as control mutated dAdar exon 3a where the binding site for both B52/SRp55 and the +8G nucleotide were disrupted by point mutations (Figure 5a). These RNA templates were bound to adipic acid dehydrazide agarose beads by covalent conjugation. After incubation with Drosophila Schneider's S2 extract, the RNA protein complexes were separated on an SDS–PAGE gel and then subjected to western blot analysis with the antibody 1H4 that recognizes the phosphorylated epitope on SR proteins. As a loading control for this experiment, an aliquot of the pulled down RNA protein complexes was visualized by staining with Coomassie Blue (Figure 5c, left panel). As shown in Figure 5c, right panel, only the RNA containing the wild-type dAdar exon 3a sequence pulled down a protein that migrated at the same molecular weight as B52/SRp55 in the S2 extract. Therefore, B52/SRp55 could regulate the alternative splicing of exon 3a in Drosophila by binding within exon 3a.

B52/SRp55 is required for the dAdar exon3/3a splicing regulation
To demonstrate that B52/SRp55 is important for the alternative splicing of dAdar exon 3/3a, we took advantage of double-stranded RNA-mediated interference for B52/SRp55 proteins in a Drosophila cell line (20).

Transient transfection of the specific siRNA in embryonic Drosophila Schneider's S2 cell line induced a strong reduction in the B52/SRp55 levels (Figure 6a). Its specificity has already been demonstrated and described in Park et al. (21). To determine whether the knockdown of B52/SRp55 affects the splicing of the third exon of dAdar gene, cells treated with dsRNA were then probed for the splicing of exon3/3a. The S2 cells endogenously express dAdar mRNA that includes the exon 3a. After RNAi depletion of B52/SRp55 there was an increased exclusion of the exon 3a sequences (Figure 6b). Thus, our data demonstrates that the binding of B52/SRp55 within exon 3a is required for the inclusion of this alternative spliced exon in the mRNA.


Figure 6
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Regulation of the splicing of dAdar exon 3/3a by B52/SRp55. (a) Western blot analysis to determine the level of down regulation of endogenous B52/SRp55 protein after knockdown with dsRNA. NE indicates HeLa nuclear extract. The black arrows indicate the molecular weight of the SR proteins that are identified with the 1H4 monoclonal antibody. (b) RT–PCR analysis of dAdar after dsRNA knockdown of B52/SRp55 in S2 cells. M, is the 1 kb plus DNA marker and the symbol minus, indicates the negative RT–PCR control. (c) Western blot analysis of total protein extracts from female and male gonads during early development (days 1, 3 and 10) probed with 1H4 monoclonal antibody. NE indicates HeLa nuclear extract. The black arrows indicate the SR proteins that are recognized with the 1H4 monoclonal antibody.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In this article, we describe the expression, tissue specificity and the complex transcriptional/splicing regulatory mechanism of dAdar. As the biological role of RNA editing is principally in the adult nervous system in Drosophila, to date most of the research on the expression pattern and the alternative splicing of dAdar has focused primarily on the brain. Indeed, the complete adult expression pattern has yet to be elucidated. The splicing pattern of the dAdar transcripts in the thorax and legs resembles that already characterized for the fly brain. However, dAdar is also expressed in the gonads where the splicing mechanism favors the inclusion of the alternative exon 3a. Interestingly, dAdar is expressed from both the early and adult promoters in testis and ovaries and full-length transcripts containing both alternatively spliced exons 3a and -1 are expressed in a tissue-specific manner as this transcripts is primarily expressed in the ovaries.

The alternative 3a exon is only present in transcripts that originate from the 4A promoter. Therefore, a time course of the expression of exon 3/3a was performed and the number of transcripts including exon 3a was observed to increase by day 3 after eclosion. A concurrent increase in the number of oocytes and supporting nurse cells was observed in the ovaries during this time course. A direct correlation can be drawn between the use of promoter 4A and the increased level of ecdysone produced by the nurse cells. This is consistent with the dAdar locus being located in an ecdysone inducible puff region near the BrC complex, which encodes transcription factors that also respond to this steroidogenic hormone (22). This increased usage of the 4A dAdar promoter was also observed during the pupal stage as ecdysone regulates larval development and metamorphosis (9). In adult females, ecdysone is also produced in the nurse cells in the ovary. Therefore, we propose that enhanced activity from the 4A promoter is a consequence of an increased level of the ecdysone produced by these nurse cells.

As transcripts of a related protein dAdat (the Drosophila t-RNA editing enzyme) were shown to be produced by the nurse cells and loaded into the egg before the fertilization (17), we wanted to determine if dAdar could be detected during oogenesis. Full-length transcripts of dAdar were detected from early stages in oocyte development through to unfertilized mature eggs. One question that needs to be address is whether the predominant transcripts expressed in gonads are translated into functional proteins. However, this will remain unanswered until better dADAR antibodies are available. In Drosophila, the oocyte nucleus has been shown to be transcriptionally inactive during most of stages of oogenesis (23). The embryo receives maternally provided transcriptional input from the two other cell sources in the oocyte: the nurse cells and the somatic follicle cells. Therefore, in the future it will be interesting to understand the contribution to dAdar expression both from the nurse cells and the somatic follicle cells.

Recently, additional roles for editing enzymes have been proposed in relation to Alu elements, siRNA and miRNA function. ADARs can edit noncoding RNAs and can affect the processing of miRNAs such as pri-miR-142 (24) or affect the seed sequence as occurs in miR-376 (25), so that the miRNA is redirected to silence a different set of transcripts. Therefore, it is interesting to consider that dADAR could interact with noncoding RNAs and retarget the silencing machinery to transcripts that are required to be inactivated during the oocyte development.

To determine which splicing factor could regulate the alternative splicing of exon 3/3a, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence of exon 3a. The B52/SRp55 binding sequence obtained by SELEX (19) is very similar to the sequence we found in exon 3a that has a hairpin configuration with the protein binding site exposed in a loop and the guanosine residue that is critical for RNA structure. We demonstrated that B52/SRp55 specifically binds within exon 3a. Depletion of B52/SRp55 in Drosophila S2 cell line by RNAi demonstrates that this splicing factor controls the inclusion of the exon 3a as its downregulation promotes the exclusion of exon 3a. However, we cannot conclude that the increase level of inclusion of exon 3a present in dAdar transcripts in the gonads is due to an increase in B52/SRp55 protein. Indeed, in testis and ovary the expression level of B52/SRp55 does not change during the developmental stages that have been analyzed (Figure 6c). This result suggests that in Drosophila gonads additional splicing factors participate in the complex splicing mechanism that regulates the alternative splicing of exon 3a. These results confirm previous reports that B52/SRp55 together with other splicing factors participate in the recognition of the distal 5'ss (20). B52/SRp55 was previously been shown to control eye development and to regulate the splicing of many transcripts involved in brain organogenesis (12,13). Here, we describe a novel function for B52/SRp55 to regulate the splicing of the exon3/3a in Adar transcripts in testis and ovaries (26).

The inclusion or exclusion of exon 3 in dAdar transcripts was demonstrated to affect both the binding and editing activity of the protein (5). In vivo no transcripts have been isolated that contain exon 3a and are edited in the deaminase domain. However, in vitro transcripts including the 3a isoform were shown to have reduced self-editing in exon 7 that lies within the deaminase domain. In addition, the exon 3a containing transcript introduces an additional 38 amino acids between dsRBM 1 and dsRBM 2 that generates two distinct enzymes. The spacing between the binding domains with exon 3a is very similar to the distance between the binding domains of ADAR2, whereas when this exon is excluded the distance is reminiscence of the distance between the dsRNA binding domains found in ADAR1. This conservation in the spacing of the dsRNA binding domains suggests that it is important for function. It has also been shown that the different isoforms of dAdar can form heterodimers and this can change its binding capability on the dsRNA target (11). Therefore, in the gonads different isoforms of dAdar with different editing activity could specifically edit transcripts that are expressed there and as a consequence modify the properties of the encoded proteins.

In ovaries, the inclusion of the alternative exon-1 results in a protein being expressed that has an additional 12 amino acids at the amino-terminal. This exon introduces an alternative in-frame translational start site that is preferentially transcribed from the early promoter. It has previously been shown that the use of alternative translational starts can regulate several cytokine family proteins whose expression level has to be fine tuned to maintain their physiological activity (16,27). Therefore, the question arises could this be a form of regulation of dAdar in the ovary that is in addition to autoediting? This regulation would represent a coordinated translational–transcriptional control that regulates alternative splicing and therefore the activity of the editing enzyme in the ovary.

New editing targets have recently been found (28). Several of these novel edited transcripts were shown to be involved in ion homeostasis, cytoskeletal components and signal transduction pathway and they may be edited in the gonads and have a biological role there.

In the gonads, development continues throughout the lifetime of the animal and the pathway involves the coordinated division and differentiation of a large number of cells. This site of extensive adult development probably requires a fine tune regulation of dAdar.

It is possible that the presence of different spliced isoforms of dAdar, may reflect differences in dAdar substrate specificity. Indeed, the tissue-specific alternative splicing of dAdar in Drosophila gonads may expand the repertoire of ADAR targets beyond the brain to Drosophila gonads (29).


    SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.


    FUNDING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Telethon Onlus Foundation, Italy (GGP06147); European Community Grant (EURASNET-LSHG-CT-2005-518{per ten thousand}238); MRC (U.1275.01.005.00001.01). Funding for open access charge: ICGEB core funding.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We would like to thank Bret S.E. Heale for helpful discussion and comments on the article. We also thank Lisa Sessi for proofreading the article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bass BL. RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (2002) 71:817–846.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  2. Flomen R, Knight J, Sham P, Kerwin R, Makoff A. Evidence that RNA editing modulates splice site selection in the 5-HT2C receptor gene. Nucleic Acids Res. (2004) 32:2113–2122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Laurencikiene J, Kallman AM, Fong N, Bentley DL, Ohman M. RNA editing and alternative splicing: the importance of co-transcriptional coordination. EMBO Rep. (2006) 7:303–307.[Web of Science][Medline]

  4. Rueter SM, Dawson TR, Emeson RB. Regulation of alternative splicing by RNA editing. Nature (1999) 399:75–80.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Keegan LP, Brindle J, Gallo A, Leroy A, Reenan RA, O’Connell MA. Tuning of RNA editing by ADAR is required in Drosophila. EMBO J. (2005) 24:2183–2193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  6. Tonkin LA, Saccomanno L, Morse DP, Brodigan T, Krause M, Bass BL. RNA editing by ADARs is important for normal behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. (2002) 21:6025–6035.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  7. Palladino MJ, Keegan LP, O’Connell MA, Reenan RA. A-to-I pre-mRNA editing in Drosophila is primarily involved in adult nervous system function and integrity. Cell (2000) 102:437–449.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  8. Wang Q, Khillan J, Gadue P, Nishikura K. Requirement of the RNA editing deaminase ADAR1 gene for embryonic erythropoiesis. Science (2000) 290:1765–1768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Palladino MJ, Keegan LP, O’Connell MA, Reenan RA. dADAR, a Drosophila double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase is highly developmentally regulated and is itself a target for RNA editing. RNA (2000) 6:1004–1018.[Abstract]

  10. Soller M, Bownes M, Kubli E. Control of oocyte maturation in sexually mature Drosophila females. Dev. Biol. (1999) 208:337–351.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  11. Gallo A, Keegan LP, Ring GM, O’Connell MA. An ADAR that edits transcripts encoding ion channel subunits functions as a dimer. EMBO J. (2003) 22:3421–3430.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  12. Fic W, Juge F, Soret J, Tazi J. Eye development under the control of SRp55/B52-mediated alternative splicing of eyeless. PLoS ONE (2007) 2:e253.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Gabut M, Dejardin J, Tazi J, Soret J. The SR family proteins B52 and dASF/SF2 modulate development of the Drosophila visual system by regulating specific RNA targets. Mol. Cell Biol. (2007) 27:3087–3097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Hoopengardner B, Bhalla T, Staber C, Reenan R. Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics. Science (2003) 301:832–836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Romano M, Marcucci R, Buratti E, Ayala YM, Sebastio G, Baralle FE. Regulation of 3' splice site selection in the 844ins68 polymorphism of the cystathionine Beta -synthase gene. J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:43821–43829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Marcucci R, Baralle FE, Romano M. Complex splicing control of the human Thrombopoietin gene by intronic G runs. Nucleic Acids Res. (2007) 35:132–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Keegan LP, Gerber AP, Brindle J, Leemans R, Gallo A, Keller W, O’Connell MA. The properties of a tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Drosophila melanogaster support an evolutionary link between pre-mRNA editing and tRNA modification. Mol. Cell Biol. (2000) 20:825–833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Mach JM, Lehmann R. An Egalitarian-BicaudalD complex is essential for oocyte specification and axis determination in Drosophila. Genes Dev. (1997) 11:423–435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Shi H, Hoffman BE, Lis JT. A specific RNA hairpin loop structure binds the RNA recognition motifs of the Drosophila SR protein B52. Mol. Cell Biol. (1997) 17:2649–2657.[Abstract]

  20. Park JW, Graveley BR. Use of RNA interference to dissect the roles of trans-acting factors in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Methods (2005) 37:341–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  21. Park JW, Parisky K, Celotto AM, Reenan RA, Graveley BR. Identification of alternative splicing regulators by RNA interference in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:15974–15979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. Wilson TG, Yerushalmi Y, Donnell DM, Restifo LL. Interaction between hormonal signaling pathways in Drosophila melanogaster as revealed by genetic interaction between methoprene-tolerant and broad-complex. Genetics (2006) 172:253–264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. King RC, Burnett RG. Autoradiographic study of uptake of tritiated glycine, thymidine, and uridine by fruit fly ovaries. Science (1959) 129:1674–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Yang W, Chendrimada TP, Wang Q, Higuchi M, Seeburg PH, Shiekhattar R, Nishikura K. Modulation of microRNA processing and expression through RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (2006) 13:13–21.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  25. Kawahara Y, Zinshteyn B, Sethupathy P, Iizasa H, Hatzigeorgiou AG, Nishikura K. Redirection of silencing targets by adenosine-to-inosine editing of miRNAs. Science (2007) 315:1137–1140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Kraus ME, Lis JT. The concentration of B52, an essential splicing factor and regulator of splice site choice in vitro, is critical for Drosophila development. Mol. Cell Biol. (1994) 14:5360–5370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Marcucci R, Romano M. Thrombopoietin and its splicing variants: Structure and functions in thrombopoiesis and beyond. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. (2008) 1782:427–432.

  28. Stapleton M, Carlson JW, Celniker SE. RNA editing in Drosophila melanogaster: new targets and functional consequences. RNA (2006) 12:1922–1932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Keegan LP, Gallo A, O’Connell MA. The many roles of an RNA editor. Nat. Rev. Genet. (2001) 2:869–878.[Web of Science][Medline]

  30. Zuker M. Computer prediction of RNA structure. Methods Enzymol. (1989) 180:262–288.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (3983K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (440K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/5/1663    most recent
gkn1080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcucci, R.
Right arrow Articles by Baralle, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcucci, R.
Right arrow Articles by Baralle, F. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?