Skip Navigation



Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published online on August 12, 2008
Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn520
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (683K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (303K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/16/5350    most recent
gkn520v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teyssier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vanacker, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teyssier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vanacker, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Gene Regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics

The orphan receptor ERR{alpha} interferes with steroid signaling

Catherine Teyssier, Stéphanie Bianco, Olivia Lanvin and Jean-Marc Vanacker*

Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon; Institut Fédératif Biosciences Gerland Lyon Sud and Université Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon cedex 07, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel: +33 (0) 4 72 72 85 91; Fax: +33 (0) 4 72 72 80 80; Email: Jean-Marc.Vanacker{at}ens-lyon.fr

Received December 4, 2007. Revised July 30, 2008. Accepted July 30, 2008.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
The estrogen receptor-related receptor {alpha} (ERR{alpha}) is an orphan member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that has been shown to interfere with the estrogen-signaling pathway. In this report, we demonstrate that ERR{alpha} also cross-talks with signaling driven by other steroid hormones. Treatment of human prostatic cells with a specific ERR{alpha} inverse agonist reduces the expression of several androgen-responsive genes, in a manner that does not involve perturbation of androgen receptor expression or activity. Furthermore, ERR{alpha} activates the expression of androgen response elements (ARE)-containing promoters, such as that of the prostate cancer marker PSA, in an ARE-dependent manner. In addition, promoters containing a steroid response element can be activated by all members of the ERR orphan receptor subfamily, and this, even in the presence of antisteroid compounds.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
The estrogen receptor-related receptor {alpha} (ERR{alpha}) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, that, together with its paralog ERRβ, has been identified due to its high level of sequence identity with the estrogen receptor {alpha}(ER{alpha}) (1). A third member of the subfamily, ERR{gamma}, has also been isolated more recently (2). These three receptors are referred to as ‘orphan’, since their transcriptional activities do not require the addition of an identified physiological ligand (3). Crystallographic studies have shown that apo-ERR{alpha} and apo-ERR{gamma} spontaneously adopt an active conformation, indicating that they can activate transcription in a constitutive manner (4,5). A specific, synthetic inverse agonist (XCT790) of ERR{alpha} has however been identified that deactivates the receptor (6) and induces its proteasome-dependent degradation (7), thus facilitating the study of its activities, at least in cell culture.

ERRβ has been shown to be involved in the formation of the placenta and to regulate the maturation of primordial germ cells (8,9), whereas ERR{gamma} is essential in the oxidative metabolism of the postnatal heart (10). Published data from various laboratories have shown that ERR{alpha} plays a significant role in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Indeed, ERR{alpha} is highly expressed in tissues with high energy demands such as the heart or skeletal muscle (11–13). ERR{alpha}KO mice display a resistance to diet-induced obesity, altered fat metabolism and adsorption (14–16), fail to maintain body temperature when exposed to cold (17) and respond in an altered manner to cardiac pressure overload (18). These activities are thought to be exerted mainly in cooperation with the PPAR{gamma} coactivator 1-{alpha} (PGC1-{alpha}), which is instrumental in many metabolical processes (13,19–20). However, ERR{alpha} is also expressed in many other tissues, in which its physiological roles has not been determined (11). The receptor has been proposed to act as a modulator of bone mass (21), and its high expression in ovarian, colon and breast cancers correlates with poor prognosis (22–26) although the functions of ERR{alpha} in cancer have not been investigated.

The structural proximity between ERRs and ERs, in particular in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) has led to hypothesis that the ERRs could interfere with the estrogen pathway (27). Indeed it has been shown that, at least in certain cellular and promoter contexts, some ERR response elements (ERREs) could transduce an estrogen signal (28–30), as illustrated by the case of the osteopontin gene promoter (31,32). In addition, such genes as lactoferrin or the breast cancer marker pS2, can be coregulated by both ERR{alpha} and ER{alpha}, through neighboring sites on their promoter (33,34). Furthermore, ERR{alpha} has been proposed to regulate the expression of aromatase (35), the rate-limiting enzyme in estrogen biosynthesis, and the expression of ERR{alpha} itself is reportedly induced by estrogens in the mouse uterus (36). Phylogenetical studies have grouped the ERRs in nuclear receptor subfamily 3, not only together with the ERs but also with the other steroid receptors [StRs, namely androgen receptor (AR), progesterone receptor (PR), glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)] (37). This raises the hypo thesis that ERRs can also interfere with steroid signaling.

In this report, we show that the expression of androgen-responsive genes can be down-regulated by the ERR{alpha}-specific inverse agonist XCT790 in LNCaP (androgen-dependent human prostate cancer) cells. Importantly this effect of XCT790 is not exerted through a modulation of AR expression or activity. ERR{alpha} stimulates the activity of androgen-responsive element (ARE)-containing promoters, including that of PSA, a marker of prostate cancers. Other steroid-response elements (StRE)-containing promoters can also be activated by ERRs even in the presence of antisteroid compounds. Our results thus document a new level of interferences of ERRs in hormonal pathway.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmids
ERR{alpha} mutants have been described elsewhere (38). For construction of LEF-RE-Luc reporter plasmid, an oligonucleotide (sequence: 5'-GATCCGCACCCTTTGAAGCTCA-3') encompassing the cognate sequence was cloned as a trimer in plasmid pGL3-promoter (Promega, Charbonnières, France) and the construct was verified by sequencing. The following plasmids were gifts: PSA promoter derivatives (HW Chen, UC Davis; described in ref. 39), scARE2.1-Luc (F Claessens, Leuven University), DR1-Luc (H Escriva-Garcia, Banyuls-sur-Mer), PGC1-{alpha} (A Kralli, Scripps Institute, San Diego), ARR2PB-Luc (RJ Matusik, Vanderbilt University; described in ref. 40), SRC1 (MG Parker, Imperial College, London), GRIP1, GalAR-AF1, GalAR-LBD (MR Stallcup, USC Los Angeles; ref 41), pS2-Luc (V. Cavaillès, Montpellier), PerRE-Luc (G. Triqueneaux, ENS Lyon), MMTV-Luc, GR, DNA-binding deficient GR mutant (GRdim) (42), AR, ARE-Luc and GRE-Luc (M. Resche-Rigon, Prostrakan, Romainville). ARE-Luc contains a trimer of the ARE from the rat probasin promoter (sequence: 5'-AGCTTAATAGGTTCTTGGAGTACTTTACGTCGA-3', consensus ARE underlined; ref. 43) cloned in front of the collagenase promoter, scARE2.1 contains four copies of an ARE (sequence: 5'-GGCTCTTTCAGTTCT-3', ARE underlined; ref. 44) from the secretory component gene cloned in front of the minimal tk promoter). GRE-Luc contains an hexamer of the glucocorticoid response elements (GRE) from the metallothionein promoter (sequence: 5'-CGGTACAAAATGTTCTGGGCC-3', consensus GRE underlined; ref. 45) cloned in front of the minimal early SV40 promoter.

Cells and transfections
LNCaP cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 10 mM Hepes and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. HeLa and PC3 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For transient transfections 105 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected using 3 µl of ExGen 500 (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France), 50 ng Luciferase reporter plasmid. CMV-βGal plasmid (50 ng) was added to normalize transfection efficiency and pSG5 plasmid was added as a carrier up to 500 ng. Cells were lyzed 48 h after transfection and reporter activities were determined, using standard methods. All transfections were performed in triplicate. Dexamethasone (Dex), RU486, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), trichostatin A (TSA), flutamide and XCT790 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Quentin Falavier, France) and resuspended in DMSO.

The sequences of the siRNAs used to target ERR{alpha} are as follow: sense 5'-GGCAGAAACCUAUCUCAGGUU-3', antisense 5'-CCUGAGAUAGGUUUCUGCCUC-3'. The siRNA control was provided by Dharmacon (siCONTROL Non-Targeting siRNA #1). Annealed siRNAs were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) into LNCaP cells in 6-well plates first for 48 h. Cells were transfected a second time with siRNAs and then treated for 48 h with XCT790. RNA extraction was performed and mRNA levels for the indicated genes were determined by quantitative PCR (QPCR) and normalized to the 36B4 mRNA level. Parallel cell extracts were prepared for immunoblots.

Expression analysis
RNAs were purified using Guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction. Two micrograms total RNA were DNaseI-digested and retrotranscribed in a final volume of 20 µl using SuperScript II retrotranscription kit (InVitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France) under the conditions recommended by the supplier. QPCR were performed using the Sybr Green Jump Start kit (Sigma Aldrich) in duplicate on a ABI apparatus using standard PCR cycle. Specific primers for MAK and KLK2 were from refs (46) and (47), respectively.

Primers used in this study:

36B4 5'-GTCACTGTGCCAGCCCAGAA-3' and 5'-TCAATGGTGCCCCTGGAGAT-3'; AR 5'-CCTGGCTTCCGCAACTTACAC-3' and 5'-GGACTTGTGCATGCGGTACTCA-3'; ERR{alpha} 5'-CAAGCGCCTCTGCCTGGTCT-3' and 5'-ACTCGATGCTCCCCTGGATG-3'; KLK2 5'-CATCCAGTCTCGGATTG-3' and 5'-CTCATATTGTAGAGCGGGT-3'; MAK 5'-GGTCACAGCCACCATACACTGA-3' and 5'-ACTTCCAACAGCCCACACATC-3'; MAO-A 5'-ACCAAGCCAGATGGGTCA-3' and 5'-TTTCCGGGCAAGAATGAA-3'; MCAD 5'-ATTGGTGACGGAGCTGGTTT-3' and 5'-TCCAACAGCACCAGCAGCTA-3'; NKX3.1 5'-GCCGAGACGCTGGCAGA-3' and 5'-CAGATAAGACCCCAAGTGCCTTT-3'; PGC1-{alpha} 5'-TGGTGCAGTGACCAATCAGAAA-3' and 5'-GGACTGCTAGCAAGTTTGCCTC-3'; PSA 5'-ACCAGAGGAGTTCTTGACCCCAAA-3' and 5'-CCCCAGAATCACCCGAGCAG-3'; RIP140 5'-CAGTTCCACTCAGCCCAGCA-3' and 5'-ACAGCCAACGTGCTCAGGGA-3'.

Western blot
Cells were lyszed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; EDTA 5 mM; 0.5% Nonidet P-40; 0.1% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% SDS and a cocktail of protease inhibitors) then centrifuged 15 min at 13 200 rpm. After 10 min heating in Laemmli's buffer, proteins (30 µg) were resolved on 8% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Orsay, France) and blocked by incubation at room temperature for 1 h in TBS–Tween 0.1% containing 5% nonfat dry milk. Blots were probed with various Abs (AR, ERR{alpha} and actin) and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL kit, Amersham Biosciences) with appropriate specific peroxydase conjugated Abs. Anti-AR and antiactin antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and Sigma Aldrich, respectively. Anti-ERR{alpha} has raised in rabbit, using a KLH-coupled peptide mapping a region conserved between mouse and human ERR{alpha}, but divergent in other ERR subfamily member.

ChIP
ChIP assays were performed as described previously (48). Briefly, LNCaP cells were grown in phenol red-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% dextran/charcoal-stripped serum in 150 mm dishes for 3 days, and then treated with or without 10 nM DHT for 2 h. A small portion of the crosslinked, sheared chromatin solution was saved as input DNA, and the remainder was precleared by incubating with 20 µl of preblocked protein A agarose/Salmon Sperm DNA (Upstate Biotech, Chandlers Ford, UK) for 2 h. The precleared chromatin was then immunoprecipitated with 2 µg of anti-AR antibody (H-280, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or 2 µg of anti-ERR{alpha} antibody (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with rotation overnight at 4°C. The next day, immunoprecipitated DNAs were recovered by incubated with 20 µl of preblocked protein A agarose/Salmon Sperm DNA (Upstate Biotech) for 2 h. The immune complexes were eluted from beads with an elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3). Crosslinking was reverse overnight at 65°C and DNAs were purified using QIAquick column (Qiagen, Courtabœuf, France). Real-time PCR were performed using 2 µl DNA in duplicate on a ABI apparatus using standard PCR cycles. Primers used in this study have been previously described (49). Identical results were obtained when using our own anti-ERR{alpha} antibody.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
To determine whether ERR{alpha} interacts with steroid signaling, we first focus on androgen signaling in LNCaP cells. These cells were treated with the specific ERR{alpha} inverse agonist XCT790 for 24 h. As judged by QPCR, this compound reduced the expression of several androgen-responsive genes [PSA/KLK3, NKX3.1, KLK2 and MAK1; (46,50–52)] nearly as efficiently as did flutamide, a specific antiandrogen (Figure 1A). This effect is not due to a general aspecific inhibitory effect of XCT790 since the expression of PGC1-{alpha} was not modified. As controls, the expression of ERR{alpha} validated target genes, such as MAO-A, MCAD and RIP140 (53,6) were also down-regulated by XCT790 in LNCaP cells (Figure 1B). No synergy was observed between flutamide and XCT790. The latter acted in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Figure 1C and D, respectively) with a half-maximum efficiency on both PSA and MCAD expression of 5 x 10–6 M, a concentration which we used hereafter. TSA [a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor] induced in an overexpression of PSA (Figure 1E) as reported (54). Upon cotreatment with TSA and XCT790, PSA expression displayed an intermediate level, suggesting that the two phenomena are independent. XCT790 is thus unlikely to induce HDAC recruitment to the PSA promoter. To assess the specificity of XCT790, LNCaP cells were treated with an siRNA directed against ERR{alpha} (siE). This treatment had no effect on PSA expression, although it efficiently down-regulated the expression of ERR{alpha} mRNA and protein (Figure 1F), suggesting that other factors could compensate for the absence of ERR{alpha}. However, XCT790 had no effect on PSA expression when used on siE-treated cells, indicating that the drug absolutely required ERR{alpha} to inhibit PSA expression.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. XCT790 regulates the expression of androgen-responsive genes in LNCaP cells in an ERR{alpha}-dependent manner. (A) Cells were treated for 24 h with 5 x 10–6 M XCT790, 10–6 M flutamide or a combination of both, as indicated. RNA were extracted, retrotranscribed and analyzed by QPCR. Expressions were normalized against 36B4 level and expressed relative to untreated control (C) arbitrarily assigned to 1. Results represent the average of a typical triplicate experiment with standard deviation as error bar. Experiments were performed at least three times. (B) Same as in (A) using XCT790 treatment only. (C) Cells were treated with 5 x 10–6 M XCT790 for the indicated time. PSA and NKX3.1 expression were analyzed as in (A). (D) Cells were treated with the indicated XCT790 concentrations for 24 h. PSA and MCAD mRNA expression were analyzed as in (A). Results are depicted with a logarithmic x scale. (E) Cells were treated with XCT790, TSA (125 ng/ml) or both for 72 h, with medium renewal every 24 h. PSA was analyzed as in (A). (F) Cells in 6-well plate (triplicate) were transfected with 25 pmol/well of ERR{alpha}-directed (siE) or unrelated control (siC) siRNA as described in Materials and methods section and treated or not with XCT790 for 48 h. PSA and ERR{alpha} mRNA expression were analyzed as in (A). Protein levels were determined by immunoblots from cell extracts of a fourth siRNA-transfected well. Protein results are from a single experiment that is representative of three independent ones. mRNA results are the average of three experiments with error bars indicating standard deviation. ANOVA tests were performed to determine statistical significance; ns: nonsignificant, **P < 0.01.

 
We next address whether ERR{alpha} could transcriptionally act on the PSA promoter. To this end, we cotransfected HeLa cells that were chosen because they do not express PSA. Full-length PSA promoter was activated by ERR{alpha} and by AR (the latter, but not the former, requiring DHT, as expected) (Figure 2A). A deletion construct in which the 5' enhancer was absent displayed a reduced response to AR as published (46), and did not react at all to ERR{alpha}, suggesting that the deleted 5' region could be involved in the response to both AR and ERR{alpha}. As expected, activation of the PSA promoter by ERR{alpha} was inhibited by XCT790 treatment (Figure 2B). To determine whether ERR{alpha} bound to the endogenous PSA gene, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments followed by QPCR targeting specific regions of the PSA promoter (Figure 2C). ERR{alpha} was recruited to the enhancer (Enh) region to a low level, but not to the intermediate (E–P) or promoter (P) regions. Interestingly XCT790, but not DHT, significantly enhanced the recruitment of the receptor specifically to the Enh region. Altogether, this indicates that ERR{alpha} transcriptionally activates the expression of PSA by binding to its Enh region. XCT790 enhances the binding of the receptor and suppresses its activity.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. ERR{alpha} activates the PSA gene promoter. (A) A schematic representation of the used PSA reporter constructs is depicted at the top, in which the regions amplified by QPCR after ChIP are indicated. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with the indicated reporter constructs together with the varying amounts of ERR{alpha} (left panel) or AR (right panel) encoding plasmids. CMVβGal was added as a transfection efficiency control. Where indicated DHT (10–8 M) was added to the culture medium. Luciferase activity was determined 48 h after transfection and normalized against βGal activity. Results are expressed as fold activation over transfection without activator and expressed as the average of a typical triplicate experiment with error bars representing standard deviation. (B) HeLa cells were transiently transfected by pPSA-Luc and varying amounts of ERR{alpha} in presence (black bars) or absence (white bars) of XCT790. (C) LNCaP cells were treated with 5 x 10–6 M XCT790 for 48 h and 10–9 M DHT for 2 h, as indicated. The recruitment of ERR{alpha} to PSA gene regions was examined by ChIP analyses with anti-ERR{alpha} specific antibodies. IgG was used as control. Specific regions were amplified by QPCR. Results are expressed as percentage of input. Shown is the average of four independent experiments with error bars indicating standard deviation. ANOVA tests were performed to determine statistical significance; ns: nonsignificant, ***P < 0.005.

 
The above results suggest that ERR{alpha} could activate transcription through AREs, several copies of which are present in the PSA Enh region. To test this hypothesis, we used other plasmid constructions in which AREs were present in various configurations. A composite rat probasin promoter derivative (ARR2PB; 40) was activated by ERR{alpha} in a dose-dependent manner without exogenously added DHT (Figure 3A). In contrast to ERR{alpha}, AR achieved a maximal activation level only in the presence of DHT. ERR{alpha} also activated transcription from a construct (ARE-Luc) encompassing three androgen response elements (ARE) cloned in front of the minimal collagenase promoter (Figure 3B). DHT supplementation resulted in an additive effect, due to the endogenous expression of AR in HeLa cells (as verified by western blot; data not shown). Importantly ERR{alpha} activated transcription even in the presence of the antiandrogen flutamide. As expected, AR activated transcription from the ARE-containing plasmid, an effect that was maximal upon DHT supplementation and blunted by flutamide addition. Altogether, this indicates that an ARE is sufficient to confer ERR{alpha} response to a heterologous promoter. Regulation through AREs was also extended to other members of the ERR subfamily (Figure 3C). Indeed, mouse ERRβ and {gamma}, as well as zebra fish ERR{alpha}-activated transcription of the synthetic ARE-containing promoter. PSA promoter was also activated by mouse ERRβ and zebra fish, but apparently not by mouse ERR{gamma}. Some nuclear receptors display two transcription activation functions, one (the AF1) located in the A/B (N-terminal) domain and the other (the AF2) located in the extreme C-terminal part of the molecule. On both reporter constructs, identical effects were observed using the wild-type or an A/B domain-deleted version of ERR{alpha}. In contrast, this receptor was inactive in the absence of the AF2 function. Thus, as for transactivation on other response elements (38), ERR{alpha} only requires the AF2 function to activate transcription from the ARE site.


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. AREs confer responsiveness to ERR{alpha}. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with ARR2PB composite construct together with the indicated amount of ERR{alpha}- or AR-encoding plasmid. DHT (10–8 M) was added where indicated. (B) Same type of experiments using a construct in which three AREs were inserted in front of the minimal collagenase promoter. DHT (10–8 M) or flutamide (10–6 M) was added where indicated. (C) Cells were transfected with pPSA-Luc (left panel) or ARE-Luc (right panel) with the indicated ERR-encoding vectors. Except for zfERR{alpha} [zebra fish (Danio rerio) ERR{alpha}] all versions originate from mouse. All reporter activities were determined and expressed as in Figure 2A.

 
In addition to its direct effect on ERR{alpha}, XCT790 could act on PSA expression by regulating the expression and/or activity of AR, a hypothesis that we next evaluated. The expression of AR-corresponding mRNA was unaffected by treatment with XCT790, flutamide or a combination of both (Figure 4A). Likewise, AR protein level was not reduced upon drug treatment even after a 72 h exposure. In contrast, XCT790 dramatically reduced the ERR{alpha} protein level, but not of the corresponding mRNA, a phenomenon that we also have observed in several other cell lines (7). We next addressed whether XCT790 reduced the expression of androgen-responsive genes by merely blocking AR activity. ChIP experiments were first performed to determine whether AR recruitment to regions of the PSA promoter was modified by XCT790 treatment (Figure 4B). As expected, AR bound to the Enh-, as well as to the P- (although to a lower extent), but not to the E–P region of the PSA gene, in a DHT-dependent manner (49). Cotreatment by XCT790 had no effect on the recruitment of AR to the PSA promoter. We then reasoned that if XCT790 blocked AR activity on the PSA promoter, then DHT would be unable to up-regulate gene expression upon XCT790 pretreatment. On the contrary, DHT relieved the inhibition of PSA expression exerted by XCT790 (Figure 4C). Importantly DHT activates PSA expression to a similar extent in the presence or absence of XCT790 (round 2.5-fold). We thus concluded that XCT790 does not impact on AR expression or signaling.


Figure 4
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. XCT790 does not impair androgen signaling. (A) LNCaP cells were treated with the indicated compounds. AR and ERR{alpha} mRNA expression were analyzed as in Figure 1A. Proteins were extracted and analyzed by western blotting using specific antibody for AR, ERR{alpha} or actin used as a loading control. (B) Cells were treated as indicated and ChIP were performed as in Figure 2B using anti-AR antibody. ANOVA test were performed to determine statistical significance; ns: nonsignificant, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005. (C) Cells were treated with 5 x 10–6 M XCT790 (24 h pretreatment) and/or 10–8 M DHT (8 h treatment) as indicated. PSA mRNA expression was analyzed as in Figure 1A.

 
ERR{alpha} activates transcription through AREs in HeLa and LNCaP cells, which both express AR. It is thus possible that AR is required for this effect of ERR{alpha}. To address this hypothesis, we performed cotransfection experiments in PC3 cells, which do not express AR (Figure 5A). In these cells, ERR{alpha} rather repressed the expression driven by the PSA promoter. In contrast, upon AR cotransfection, ERR{alpha} activated the PSA promoter in a dose-dependent manner. Strikingly, DHT was required for the transactivation by AR, but not for AR to complement ERR{alpha} activity. The same phenomenon was observed using the ARE-Luc construct. These results indicate that ERR{alpha} requires AR to activate transcription through ARE. In contrast, AR did not contribute to activation by ERR{alpha} of the pS2 promoter (which does not respond to AR), indicating a specific effect on androgen-responsive promoters. We next tried to determine the domains of AR involved in helping ERR{alpha} activation. Chimerae containing the AR-AF1 or -LBD fused to the Gal4 DBD did not complement ERR{alpha} activity on the PSA promoter indicating that these AR domains are not sufficient for complementation. We then compared the effect of GR derivatives. Cotransfection of wild-type GR resulted in activation of the PSA promoter by ERR{alpha}. In contrast, GRdim which is defective in DNA binding (42), did not complement ERR{alpha}. This suggests that the DBD of StRs is necessary to complement ERR{alpha}-driven ARE transactivation.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. AR requirement in ERR{alpha}-induced ARE regulation. (A) PC3 cells were transfected with the indicated reporter plasmids and amounts of ERR{alpha}- or AR-encoding plasmids. DHT (10–8 M) was added where indicated. (B) Cells were transfected with pPSA-Luc together with the indicated amounts of ERR{alpha} and 100 ng of the indicated plasmids. All reporter activities were determined and expressed as in Figure 2A.

 
In an effort to extend our findings to other steroid response elements, we next used the MMTV promoter, a well known model of steroid response. Upon cotransfection, ERR{alpha} by itself was inactive (Figure 6A). However, when supplemented with the PGC1-{alpha} coactivator, ERR{alpha} exerted a dose-dependent activation. The same profile was also observed using a construct in which GRE from the metallothionein promoter were cloned in front of the minimal SV promoter. In contrast, constructs harboring multimers of different steroid-unrelated response elements (LEF-RE, responding to TCF/LEF; DR1-Luc, responding to RAR-RXR; PerRE-Luc, responding to Period) were not activated by ERR{alpha} alone or in combination with PGC1-{alpha} (Figure 6A and data not shown), indicating that the effect is GRE specific. Activation is also ERR{alpha} specific, since both MMTV and GRE-Luc constructs were unable to respond to ER{alpha}, although the latter receptor was active on an estrogen response elements-containing plasmid (Figure 6A and data not shown). However, PGC1-{alpha} is not specific for ERR{alpha} activity on the GRE, since cotransfection with SRC1 or GRIP1/TIF2 resulted in the same effect (Figure 5B).


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 6. ERRs activate transcription through other steroid response elements in a coactivator-dependent manner. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with MMTV-Luc, GRE-Luc or LEF-RE-Luc constructs together with the indicated amount of ERR{alpha} or ER{alpha}. Where indicated, PGC1-{alpha} (100 ng) was added to the transfection mixture. In ER{alpha} transfections, 17β-estradiol (10–8 M) was added to the culture medium. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with GRE-Luc reporter plasmid together with the indicated coactivator, with or without ERR{alpha}.

 
Per definition, transcription from a GRE can be activated by the GR in the presence of glucocorticoids (such as the synthetic drug Dex), an effect that can be abrogated by the addition of synthetic antisteroid compounds such as RU486 (Figure 7A). In contrast, ERR{alpha}-PGC1-{alpha} activation through the GRE was unaffected by the presence of both Dex and RU486. This indicates that ERR{alpha} can activate transcription even in the presence of antisteroid compounds. In addition this also demonstrates that the effect of ERR{alpha} on the GRE does not result from activation of an endogenous StR, which would be blocked by RU486. In the experiments above, we observed that PGC1-{alpha} was capable of activating transcription through the GRE when transfected alone, and not only in the presence of exogenous ERR{alpha}. It is likely that, for this activity, PGC1-{alpha} requires a transcription factor as a DNA-tethering factor. To determine the nature of this factor, cells were transfected with GRE-Luc construct together with varying amounts of PGC1-{alpha} and subsequently treated with synthetic compounds (Figure 7B). The activity of PGC1-{alpha} was completely abrogated by XCT790, but not by RU486 treatment, indicating that it depends on ERR{alpha} and not on an endogenous StR. However, an enhanced PGC1-{alpha} effect was observed when activating the GR pathway by Dex treatment. This over-activation could be specifically reversed when adding RU486. There again, XCT790 was required to completely abolish the transcriptional potency of PGC1-{alpha}. We thus concluded that PGC1-{alpha} is a promiscuous coactivator that can act through GR and ERR{alpha}. However in the absence of exogenously added hormones, PGC1-{alpha} activity on GRE is strictly dependent on ERR{alpha}.


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 7. Ligand modulation of ERR{alpha}/PGC1-{alpha} transcriptional effects. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with GRE-Luc together with GR, ERR{alpha} or PGC1-{alpha}, as indicated. The GR agonist Dex (10–8 M) or StR antagonist RU486 (10–6 M) were added to the culture medium as indicated. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with GRE-Luc reporter plasmid together with varying amounts of PGC1-{alpha} encoding plasmid. XCT790 (5 x 10–6 M), Dex (10–8 M) or RU486 (10–6 M) were added to the culture medium as indicated. All reporter activities in this figure were determined and expressed as in Figure 2A.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Work by various laboratories including ours has pointed to several levels of interference between ERR{alpha} and estrogen signaling (27). For example, the recently determined in vivo ERR{alpha}-binding site (55) can also be used as an estrogen response element (28–32). In this report, we show that several genes that can be down-regulated by antiandrogens in LNCaP cells are also subject to repression by XCT790, an ERR{alpha} inverse agonist. This compound acts in a specific manner since it does not deactivate other ERRs, ER{alpha} nor AR (this report and ref. 7). Furthermore, whereas the expression of PSA, NKX3.1, KLK2 and MAK is down-regulated by XCT790, such genes as AR, PGC1-{alpha} or ERR{alpha} itself are not affected, indicating that the compound is not a general inhibitor of transcription. The effect of XCT790 is dependent on the presence of ERR{alpha} since the drug has no effect in the absence of the receptor.

Since XCT790 down-regulates the expression of various genes, we expected that overexpression of ERR{alpha}, brought about by adenoviral vector, would result in the opposite effect. However, in our hands, PSA, NKX3.1 or KLK2 did not respond to ERR{alpha} overexpression (data not shown). This can be due to a saturating effect of the endogenous ERR{alpha} protein on the promoters of these genes in LNCaP cells. Alternatively, a stimulating effect of ERR{alpha} could require the coexpression of a yet unidentified partner. Although active when transiently transfected alone, we also noted that the effect of ERR{alpha} on the PSA promoter is much lower than that of AR, suggesting that the orphan receptor is a weak activator, or that it lacks the coexpression of a potentializing partner for a maximal effect. The identity of this eventual partner is unknown but PGC1-{alpha}, bringing no further activation (data not shown), is not a likely candidate.

In contrast to this, the effect of ERR{alpha} on other than-ARE StREs, requires the coexpression of a coactivator. The effect of ERR{alpha} on StREs (ARE, GRE or MMTV) also extends to other members of the ERR subfamily, not only to all mouse ERR isoform, but also to zebra fish ERR{alpha} and ERR{gamma} as well as to the unique ERR present in the amphioxus [(56,57); Figure 3C and data not shown]. It is thus likely that regulation through StREs is an ancestral property of all ERR receptors.

The regulation of expression exerted by ERR{alpha} through an ARE/StRE is at the promoter level, as evidenced by the fact that it can be transferred to a heterologous promoter in a specific manner. ERR{alpha}-responding ARE/StRE include derivatives from the PB, MMTV and metallothionein promoters (Figures 3 and 6) as well as from the nonpalindromic, AR-selective, GR-unresponsive human secretory component gene promoter (44) (data not shown). Given the variety of ARE/StRE used in this study, it seems likely that ERR{alpha} acts through this response element and not through cryptic ERREs that furthermore could not be detected upon close inspection of the elements. However, direct binding of in vitro synthesized ERR{alpha} proteins on an ARE/StRE could not be observed in electrophoretic mobility shift experiments (data not shown), suggesting that the receptor may require an additional protein species to bind to ARE/StRE. The capacity to recognize these sequences depends on the P-box of the DBD (58–59). The P-box of ERR{alpha} is an ER-type (data not shown) which confers recognition of EREs but not of StREs. Consistently, we observed that ERR{alpha} was recruited to the PSA enhancer but to a lower extent than AR. XCT790 does not only deactivate ERR{alpha} but also rather transforms the receptor into an actively repressing factor. Two lines of evidence support this hypothesis. First, an siE does not down-regulate PSA expression, indicating that XCT790 does more than merely eliminating the receptor. Second, XCT790 promotes a higher level of ERR{alpha} recruitment to the PSA promoter. Although this may appear contradictory with XCT790-induced degradation of ERR{alpha}, it should be reminded that 17β-estradiol also promotes the degradation of its cognate receptor and its binding to DNA (60,61). Furthermore, binding of ERR{alpha} on the pS2 promoter in MCF7 cells is not diminished by XCT790 treatment (data not shown) although this also induces the degradation of the receptor in these cells (7). Thus the action of XCT790 at the local (promoter) level, as visualized by ChIP, appears different from its global (whole cell) effect observed by western blot.

Several factors have been identified that transcriptionally regulate androgen-responsive genes. In some cases, this regulation is exerted through perturbation of AR transcriptional activities. This is for instance the case of C/EBP{alpha} and Ebp1 that act as AR corepressors (62,63). In addition, Ebp1 also down-regulates the expression of AR itself providing an additional indirect control level on the expression of AR-dependent genes (47). None of these mechanisms are likely to explain the effects of the ERR{alpha} inverse agonist. Indeed, this compound does not perturbate AR expression or activity. This suggests that AR and ERR{alpha} act in parallel pathways. However, we did not observe any additive effect of antiandrogen and anti-ERR{alpha} cotreatment, which suggests that both drugs eventually act on a common factor. This apparent discrepancy can be solved when hypothesizing that ERR{alpha} requires AR to act on androgen-responsive promoter. In support to this, we observed that ERR{alpha} was capable of activating the PSA promoter in PC3 cells (which do not express AR) only upon AR supplementation. However, it should be noted that an active conformation of AR is not an absolute requirement. Indeed, ERR{alpha} transactivates through the ARE in the presence of the antiandrogen flutamide in PC3 as well as in HeLa cells (Figure 3B and data not shown). In PC3 cells, ERR{alpha} can also be complemented by GR to activate the PSA promoter. Interestingly, GRdim is inactive in ERR{alpha} complementation, indicating that DNA binding by a StR is involved. Consistenly, (i) the AF1 or LBD moiety of AR are not sufficient to promote ERR{alpha} activity on the PSA promoter, (ii) ERR{alpha} does not promote the activity of GalAR-AF1 or GalAR-LBD on Gal4-binding sites (data not shown). Altogether, this suggests that ERR{alpha} does not directly bind to the ARE but establishes transient contacts with a DNA-bound StR. XCT790 stabilizes these contacts and also induces a repressing conformation of ERR{alpha}, leading to promoter repression. Interestingly, this is unlikely to be mediated by HDAC recruitment.

Androgens play an essential role in prostate physiology. Prostate cancers are androgen-dependent for their growth, at least in the initial phases of the disease (64,65). Antiandrogen-based therapies are therefore widely used in the treatment of prostate tumors. Unfortunately, these tumors eventually develop resistance to antiandrogens, a phenomenon that lead to poor prognosis. Our results show that ERR{alpha} is able to stimulate the expression of androgen-responsive genes, even in the presence of antiandrogen. Our data may thus suggest that ERR{alpha} overexpression could help the cells to bypass the block exerted by antiandrogens. Through this, ERR{alpha} could play a role in the acquisition of androgen resistance in advanced prostate tumors. It has been shown that ERR{alpha} is indeed expressed in the prostate and in human prostatic cell lines (66). An eventual link between resistance to antiandrogen therapy and ERR{alpha} expression has not yet been investigated, but it should be noted that high ERR{alpha} expression is associated to poor prognosis in ovarian, breast and colon tumors (22–26). ERR{alpha} is active on ARE/StRE-containing promoters in the presence of the antisteroid synthetic compounds RU486 and flutamide. Our results lead to the hypothesis that a complete repression of such genes not only requires to inactivate the StRs but also the ERR family members.


   FUNDING
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
REFERENCES
 
Ligue contre le Cancer (comités Loire and Languedoc-Roussillon to J.M.V., and Rhône to S.B.); Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (grant 3874 to J.M.V. and O.L.); Association pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs de la Prostate; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (C.T.). Funding for open access charge: INCA.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are indebted to V. Cavaillès, HW Chen, F Claessens, H. Escriva-Garcia, A Kralli, RJ Matusik, MG Parker, M. Resche-Rigon and MR Stallcup, for the generous gift of their plasmids.


   Footnotes
 
Present addresses: Catherine Teyssier, Inserm U554, Centre de Biochimie Structurale, Montpellier, France Olivia Lanvin, Inserm U563, Centre Claudius Régaud, Toulouse, France


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Laudet V, Gronemeyer H. The nuclear receptor factbook. (2002) San Diego: Academic press.

  2. Hong H, Yang L, Stallcup MR. Hormone-independent transcriptional activation and coactivator binding by novel orphan nuclear receptor ERR3. J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:22618–22626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Horard B, Vanacker J.-M. Estrogen receptor-related receptors: orphan receptors desperately seeking a ligand. J. Mol. Endocrinol. (2003) 31:349–357.[Abstract]

  4. Greschik H, Wurtz J.-M, Sanglier S, Bourguet W, van Dorsselaer A, Moras D, Renaud J.-P. Structural and functional evidence for ligand-independent transcriptional activation by the estrogen-related receptor 3. Mol. Cell (2002) 9:303–313.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  5. Kallen J, Schlaeppi JM, Bitsch F, Filipuzzi I, Schilb A, Riou V, Graham A, Strauss A, Geiser M, Fournier B. Evidence for ligand-independent transcriptional activation of the human estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha): crystal structure of ERRalpha ligand binding domain in complex with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1alpha. J. Biol. Chem. (2004) 279:49330–49337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Willy PJ, Murray IR, Qian J, Busch BB, Stevens W.C. Jr, Martin R, Mohan R, Zhou S, Ordentlich P, Wei P, et al. Regulation of PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha) signaling by an estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) ligand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:8912–8917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Lanvin O, Bianco S, Kersual N, Chalbos D, Vanacker J.-M. Potentiation of ICI182,780 (Fulvestrant)-induced estrogen receptor-{alpha} degradation by the estrogen-receptor related receptor-{alpha} inverse agonist XCT790. J. Biol. Chem. (2007) 282:28328–28334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Luo J, Sladek R, Bader JA, Matthyssen A, Rossant J, Giguère V. Placental abnormalities in mouse embryos lacking the orphan nuclear receptor ERR-beta. Nature (1997) 388:778–782.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  9. Mitsunaga K, Araki K, Mizusaki H, Morohashi K, Haruna K, Nakagata N, Giguère V, Yamamura K, Abe K. Loss of PGC-specific expression of the orphan nuclear receptor ERR-beta results in reduction of germ cell number in mouse embryos. Mech. Dev. (2004) 121:237–246.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  10. Alaynick WA, Kondo RP, Xie W, He W, Dufour CR, Downes M, Jonker JW, Giles W, Naviaux RK, Giguère V, et al. ERR{gamma} directs and maintains the transition to oxidative metabolism in the postnatal heart. Cell. Metab. (2007) 6:13–24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  11. Bonnelye E, Vanacker J.-M, Spruyt N, Alric S, Fournier B, Desbiens X, Laudet V. Expression of the estrogen-related receptor 1 (ERR-1) orphan receptor during mouse development. Mech. Dev. (1997) 65:71–85.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  12. Huss JM, Kopp RP, Kelly DP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) coactivates the cardiac-enriched nuclear receptors estrogen-related receptor-alpha and -gamma. Identification of novel leucine-rich interaction motif within PGC-1alpha. J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:40265–40274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Ichida M, Nemoto S, Finkel T. Identification of a specific molecular repressor of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1alpha). J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:50991–50995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Luo J, Sladek R, Carrier J, Bader JA, Richard D, Giguère V. Reduced fat mass in mice lacking orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor alpha. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2003) 23:7947–7956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Huss JM, Torra IP, Staels B, Giguère V, Kelly DP. Estrogen-related receptor alpha directs peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha signaling in the transcriptional control of energy metabolism in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2004) 24:9079–9091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Carrier JC, Deblois G, Champigny C, Levy E, Giguère V. Estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) is a transcriptional regulator of apolipoprotein A-IV and controls lipid handling in the intestine. J. Biol. Chem. (2004) 279:52052–52058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Villena JA, Hock MB, Chang WY, Barcas JE, Giguère V, Kralli A. Orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor {alpha} is essential for adaptive thermogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2007) 104:1418–1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Huss JM, Imahashi K, Dufour CR, Weinheimer CJ, Courtois M, Kovacs A, Giguère V, Murphy E, Kelly DP. The nuclear receptor ERR{alpha} is required for the bioenergetic and functional adaptation to cardiac pressure overload. Cell Metab. (2007) 6:25–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  19. Schreiber SN, Emter R, Hock MB, Knutti D, Cardenas J, Podvinec M, Oakeley EJ, Kralli A. The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) functions in PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:6472–6477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Mootha VK, Handschin C, Arlow D, Xie X, St Pierre J, Sihag S, Yang W, Altshuler D, Puigserver P, Patterson N, et al. Erralpha and Gabpa/b specify PGC-1alpha-dependent oxidative phosphorylation gene expression that is altered in diabetic muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:6570–6575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Bonnelye E, Aubin JE. 2005 Estrogen receptor-related receptor alpha: a mediator of estrogen response in bone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (2005) 90:3115–3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. Sun P, Sehouli J, Denkert C, Mustea A, Konsgen D, Koch I, Wei L, Lichtenegger W. Expression of estrogen receptor-related receptors, a subfamily of orphan nuclear receptors, as new tumor biomarkers in ovarian cancer cells. J. Mol. Med. (2005) 83:457–467.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  23. Cavallini A, Notarnicola M, Giannini R, Montemurro S, Lorusso D, Visconti A, Minervini F, Caruso MG. Oestrogen receptor-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) and oestrogen receptors (ERalpha and ERbeta) exhibit different gene expression in human colorectal tumour progression. Eur, J, Cancer (2005) 41:1487–1494.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  24. Ariazi EA, Clark GM, Mertz JE. Estrogen-related receptor alpha and estrogen-related receptor gamma associate with unfavorable and favorable biomarkers, respectively, in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. (2002) 62:6510–6518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Suzuki T, Miki Y, Moriya T, Shimada N, Ishida T, Hirakawa H, Ohuchi N, Sasano H. Estrogen-related receptor alpha in human breast carcinoma as a potent prognostic factor. Cancer Res. (2004) 64:4670–4676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Ariazi EA, Jordan VC. Estrogen-related receptors as emerging targets in cancer and metabolic disorders. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. (2006) 6:203–215.[Web of Science][Medline]

  27. Giguère V. To ERR in the estrogen pathway. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. (2002) 13:220–225.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  28. Carroll JS, Liu XS, Brodsky AS, Li W, Meyer CA, Szary AJ, Eeckhoute J, Shao W, Hestermann EV, Geistlinger TR, et al. Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell (2005) 122:33–43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  29. Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J, Brodsky AS, Keeton EK, Fertuck KC, Hall GF, et al. Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat. Genet. (2006) 38:1289–1297.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  30. Lin C-Y, Vega VB, Thomsen JS, Zhang T, Kong SL, Xie M, Chiu KP, Lipovich L, Barnett DH, Stossi F, et al. Whole-genome cartography of estrogen receptor {alpha} binding sites. PLoS Genet. (2007) 3:e87.[CrossRef][Medline]

  31. Vanacker J-M, Delmarre C, Guo X, Laudet V. Activation of the osteopontin promoter by the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen receptor related alpha. Cell Growth Differ. (1998) 9:1007–1014.[Abstract]

  32. Vanacker J-M, Pettersson K, Gustafsson JA, Laudet V. Transcriptional targets shared by estrogen receptor- related receptors (ERRs) and estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, but not by ERbeta. EMBO J. (1999) 18:4270–4279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  33. Yang N, Shigeta H, Shi H, Teng CT. Estrogen-related receptor, hERR1, modulates estrogen receptor-mediated response of human lactoferrin gene promoter. J. Biol. Chem. (1996) 271:5795–5804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Lu D, Kiriyama Y, Lee KY, Giguère. Transcriptional regulation of the estrogen-inducible pS2 breast cancer marker gene by the ERR family of orphan nuclear receptors. Cancer Res. (2001) 61:6755–6761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Yang C, Zhou D, Chen S. Modulation of aromatase expression in the breast tissue by ERR{alpha}-1 orphan receptor. Cancer Res. (1998) 58:5695–5700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Shigeta H, Zuo W, Yang N, DiAugustine R, Teng CT. The mouse estrogen receptor-related orphan receptor alpha 1: molecular cloning and estrogen responsiveness. J. Mol. Endocrinol. (1997) 19:299–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Laudet V. Evolution of the nuclear receptor superfamily: early diversification from an ancestral orphan receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. (1997) 19:207–226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Vanacker J-M, Bonnelye E, Chopin-Delannoy S, Delmarre C, Cavailles V, Laudet V. Transcriptional activities of the orphan nuclear receptor ERR alpha (estrogen receptor-related receptor-alpha). Mol. Endocrinol. (1999) 13:764–773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Louie MC, Yang HQ, Ma AH, Xu W, Zou JX, Kung HJ, Chen HW. Androgen-induced recruitment of RNA polymerase II to a nuclear receptor-p160 coactivator complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2003) 100:2226–2230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  40. Zhang J, Thomas TZ, Kasper S, Matusik RJ. A small composite probasin promoter confers high levels of prostate-specific gene expression through regulation by androgens and glucocorticoids in vitro and in vivo. Endocrinology (2000) 141:4698–4710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  41. Ma H, Hong H, Huang S.-M, Irvine RA, Webb P, Kushner PJ, Coetzee GA, Stallcup MR. Multiple signal input and output domains of the 160-kilodalton nuclear receptor coactivator proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. (1999) 19:6164–6173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Reichardt HM, Kaestner KH, Tuckermann J, Kretz O, Wessely O, Bock R, Gass P, Schmid W, Herrlich P, Angel P, et al. DNA binding on the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival. Cell (1998) 93:531–541.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  43. Schoenmakers E, Alen P, Verrijdt G, Peeters B, Verhoeven G, Rombauts W, Claessens F. Differential DNA binding by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors involves the second Zn-finger and a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domains. Biochem. J. (1999) 341:515–521.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  44. Verrijdt G, Schoenmakers E, Alen P, Haelens A, Peeters B, Rombauts W, Claessens F. Androgen specificity of a response unit upstream of the human secretory component gene is mediated by differential receptor binding to an essential androgen response element. Mol. Endocrinol. (1999) 13:1558–1570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Kelly EJ, Sangren EP, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD. A pair of adjacent glucocorticoid response elements regulate expression of two mouse metallothionein genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1997) 94:10045–10050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  46. Jia L, Coetzee GA. Androgen receptor-dependent PSA expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells does not involve androgen receptor occupancy of the PSA locus. Cancer Res. (2005) 65:8003–8008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  47. Zhang Y, Wang XW, Jelovac D, Nakanishi T, Yu MH, Akinmade D, Goloubeva O, Ross DD, Brodie A, Hamburger AW. The ErbB3-binding protein Ebp1 suppresses androgen receptor-mediated gene transcription and tumorigenesis of prostate cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2005) 102:9890–9895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  48. Ma H, Shang Y, Lee DY, Stallcup MR. Study of nuclear receptor-induced transcription complex assembly and histone modification by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Methods Enzymol. (2003) 364:284–296.[Web of Science][Medline]

  49. Jia L, Choong CS, Ricciardelli C, Kim J, Tilley WD, Coetzee GA. Androgen receptor signaling: mechanism of interleukin-6 inhibition. Cancer Res. (2004) 64:2619–2626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  50. He WW, Sciavolino PJ, Wing J, Augustus M, Hudson P, Meissner PS, Curtis RT, Shell BK, Bostwick DG, Tindall DJ, et al. A novel human prostate-specific, androge-regulated homeobox gene (NKX3.1) that maps to 8p21, a region frequently deleted in prostate cancer. Genomics (1997) 43:69–77.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  51. Sun Z, Pan J, Balk SP. Androgen receptor-associated protein complex binds upstream of the androgen-responsive elements in the promoters of human prostate-specific antigen and kallikrein 2 genes. Nucleic Acids Res. (1997) 25:3318–3325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  52. Xia L, Robinson D, Ma AH, Chen HC, Wu F, Qiu Y, Kung HJ. Identification of human male germ cell-associated kinase, a kinase transcriptionally activated by androgen in prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:35422–35433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  53. Nichol D, Christian M, Steel H, White R, Parker MG. RIP140 expression is stimulated by estrogen-related receptor {alpha}during adipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. (2006) 281:32140–32147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  54. Korkmaz CG, Fronsdal K, Zhang Y, Lorenzo PI, Saatcioglu F. Potentiation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity by inhibition of histone deacetylation – rescue of transcriptionally compromised mutants. J. Endocrinol. (2004) 182:377–389.[Abstract]

  55. Dufour CR, Wilson BJ, Huss JM, Kelly DP, Alaynick WA, Downes M, Evans RM, Blanchette M, Giguère V. Genome-wide orchestration of cardiac functions by the orphan nuclear receptors {alpha} and {gamma}. Cell Metab. (2007) 5:345–356.[CrossRef][Medline]

  56. Bardet P-L, Obrecht-Pflumio S, Thisse C, Laudet V, Thisse B, Vanacker J.-M. Cloning and developmental expression of five estrogen-receptor related genes in the zebrafish. Dev. Genes Evol. (2004) 214:240–249.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  57. Bardet P-L, Schubert M, Horard B, Holland LZ, Laudet V, Holland ND, Vanacker J.-M. Expression of estrogen-receptor related receptors in amphioxus and zebrafish: implications for the evolution of posterior brain segmentation at the invertebrate-to-vertebrate transition. Evol. Dev. (2005) 7:223–233.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  58. Sanchez R, Nguyen D, Rocha W, White JH, Mader S. 2002 Diversity in the mechanisms of gene regulation by estrogen receptors. Bioessays (2002) 24:244–254.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  59. Gruber CJ, Gruber DM, Gruber IM, Wieser F, Huber JC. Anatomy of the estrogen response element. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. (2004) 15:73–78.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  60. Alarid ET. Lives and times of nuclear receptors. Mol. Endocrinol. (2006) 20:1972–1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Reid G, Hübner MR, Métivier R, Brand H, Denger S, Manu D, Beaudoin J, Ellenberg J, Gannon F. Cyclic, proteasome-mediated turnover of unliganded and liganded Eralpha on responsive promoters is an integral feature of estrogen signaling. Mol. Cell (2003) 11:695–707.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  62. Chattopadhyay S, Gong EY, Hwang M, Park E, Lee HJ, Hong CY, Choi HS, Cheong JH, Kwon HB, Lee K. The CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-alpha negatively regulates the transactivation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. (2006) 20:984–895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  63. Zhang Y, Fondell JD, Wang Q, Xia X, Cheng A, Lu ML, Hamburger AW. Repression of androgen receptor mediated transcription by the ErbB-3 binding protein, Ebp1. Oncogene (2002) 21:5609–5618.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  64. Feldman BJ, Feldman D. The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer (2001) 1:34–45.[CrossRef][Medline]

  65. Culig Z, Steiner H, Bartsch G, Hobisch A. Mechanisms of endocrine therapy-responsive and -unresponsive prostate tumours. Endocr. Relat. Cancer (2005) 12:229–244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  66. Cheung CP, Yu S, Wong KB, Chan LW, Lai FM, Wang X, Suetsugi M, Chen S, Chan FL. Expression and functional study of estrogen receptor-related receptors in human prostatic cells and tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (2005) 90:1830–1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Bianco, O. Lanvin, V. Tribollet, C. Macari, S. North, and J.-M. Vanacker
Modulating Estrogen Receptor-related Receptor-{alpha} Activity Inhibits Cell Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem., August 28, 2009; 284(35): 23286 - 23292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (683K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (303K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/16/5350    most recent
gkn520v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teyssier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vanacker, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teyssier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vanacker, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?