Skip Navigation



Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published online on May 5, 2009
Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkp296
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (741K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (323K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/12/4033    most recent
gkp296v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fredrick, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fredrick, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

RNA

Contribution of ribosomal residues to P-site tRNA binding

Shinichiro Shoji1,2, Nimo M. Abdi1,2, Ralf Bundschuh2,3,4 and Kurt Fredrick1,2,5,*

1Department of Microbiology, 2Center for RNA Biology, 3Department of Physics, 4Department of Biochemistry and 5Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Ohio State University, 484 W., 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 614 292 6679; Fax: +1 614 292 8120; Email: fredrick.5{at}osu.edu

Received March 18, 2009. Revised April 14, 2009. Accepted April 15, 2009.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Structural studies have revealed multiple contacts between the ribosomal P site and tRNA, but how these contacts contribute to P-tRNA binding remains unclear. In this study, the effects of ribosomal mutations on the dissociation rate (koff) of various tRNAs from the P site were measured. Mutation of the 30S P site destabilized tRNAs to various degrees, depending on the mutation and the species of tRNA. These data support the idea that ribosome-tRNA interactions are idiosyncratically tuned to ensure stable binding of all tRNA species. Unlike deacylated elongator tRNAs, N-acetyl-aminoacyl-tRNAs and tRNAfMet dissociated from the P site at a similar low rate, even in the presence of various P-site mutations. These data provide evidence for a stability threshold for P-tRNA binding and suggest that ribosome-tRNAfMet interactions are uniquely tuned for tight binding. The effects of 16S rRNA mutation G1338U were suppressed by 50S E-site mutation C2394A, suggesting that G1338 is particularly important for stabilizing tRNA in the P/E site. Finally, mutation C2394A or the presence of an N-acetyl-aminoacyl group slowed the association rate (kon) of tRNA dramatically, suggesting that deacylated tRNA binds the P site of the ribosome via the E site.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
The ribosomal P site plays a central role in all phases of translation. Initiation involves recognition of the start codon by initiator tRNA in the P site, elongation involves passage of many elongator tRNAs through the P site, termination involves hydrolysis of the mature polypeptide from tRNA in the P site, and ribosome recycling involves release of deacylated tRNA from the P site.

Biochemical experiments have shown that peptidyl-tRNA (or its analog N-acetyl-aminoacyl-tRNA; Ac-aa-tRNA) occupies the P site of both subunits (i.e. the P/P site), whereas deacylated tRNA can spontaneously fluctuate between the P/P and P/E sites (1–4). In the P/E configuration, the acceptor end of tRNA occupies the 50S E site, while the anticodon stem loop (ASL) remains in the 30S P site. Based on single-molecule FRET experiments, oscillation of tRNA between the P/P and P/E sites occurs at a rate of 1–5 s–1 in solution (3). Movement of tRNA into the P/E site involves an interaction with the L1 stalk and is integral to the mechanism of translocation (1,5–10).

The affinity of tRNA for the P site of the ribosome relies mostly on interactions of the ASL with mRNA and the 30S subunit (11,12). In the presence of mRNA, tRNA can bind either the 70S ribosome or the 30S subunit with a Kd in the nanomolar range (11–15). In contrast, the affinity of tRNA for the P site of the isolated 50S subunit is too low to accurately measure (16). The fact that contacts in the 50S subunit account for much less of the total binding free energy is consistent with a much lower energy barrier for translocation with respect to the 50S subunit (i.e. hybrid-state formation) than for translocation with respect to the 30S subunit (17).

Atomic-resolution crystal structures have revealed multiple ribosomal contacts to tRNA and mRNA in the 30S P site (Figure 1) (18–20). 16S rRNA nucleotides (nt) A790 and m2G966, and the C-terminal ‘tails’ of ribosomal proteins S9 and S13 interact with the sugar-phosphate backbone of tRNA. C1400 forms a stacking interaction with the anticodon nt 34 of tRNA, while G926 contacts the mRNA backbone between the P and E codons. G1338 and A1339 of 16S rRNA are positioned to form Type II and Type I minor interactions, respectively, with the anticodon stem of tRNA (18–20). All of these 16S rRNA nucleotides are universally conserved, except for m2G966, which is conserved in bacteria (21). Mutations at these positions decrease translation in vivo to varying degrees, with substitutions at 1339 conferring the largest defects (22,23). Biochemical studies have shown that truncation of S9 and mutations at positions 1338 and 1339 differentially affect binding of specific tRNA species (14,23). Yet, no atomic-resolution structure of ribosomes containing P/E-tRNA is currently available, and it remains unclear how particular contacts in the 30S P site contribute to the overall binding energy of different tRNA species in either the P/P or P/E site. Here, the effects of several ribosomal mutations on P-tRNA stability are measured. The data obtained shed light on how interactions in the P site are idiosyncratically tuned for stable and uniform binding of an assortment of natural tRNA substrates.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. Ribosomal contacts to tRNA and mRNA in the A, P and E sites. In the overview (left panel), 16S rRNA is colored cyan; small-subunit ribosomal proteins, marine blue; 23S rRNA and large-subunit ribosomal proteins, gray. In the close-up (right three panels), residues of the 30S subunit targeted in this study are shown in red. Essential 16S rRNA nucleotides are shown in cyan. A C-terminal extension present in S13 of Thermus thermophilus but not in E. coli is labeled in gray. A-site tRNA is shown in magenta; P-site tRNA, orange; E-site tRNA, salmon; mRNA, green. This figure was created from the X-ray structure of the T. thermophilus ribosomal complex (PDB ID code 2J00 and 2J01) (18).

 

   MATERIAL AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Strains
The {Delta}7 prrn strains supported by mutant ribosomes were constructed as described (10,24). An Escherichia coli strain engineered to express S7 with truncation of the β-hairpin (S7{Delta}77–84) has been described (25). Strains expressing S9 and/or S13 with C-terminal truncations (S9{Delta}113–117, S13{Delta}128–130 and S9{Delta}113–117/S13{Delta}128–130) have been described (14).

Ribosomes, tRNAs and mRNAs
Tight-couple ribosomes and isolated subunits were prepared as described (10,24), dialyzed against polymix buffer (26), and stored at –70°C. 50S subunits harboring G2252U were purified from a mixed population of ribosomes using affinity chromatography as described (27,28). tRNAPhe, tRNAVal, tRNAArg, tRNAGlu, tRNAMet and tRNAfMet were purchased from Chemical Block (Moscow, Russia). tRNATyr2 was purchased from Sigma. [3'-32P]-tRNA was prepared by re-extending the CCA end of 3'-truncated tRNA in the presence of [{alpha}-32P]ATP as described (28). [3'-32P]-tRNA{Delta}A76 was made in an analogous way except that [{alpha}-32P]CTP was added in the absence of ATP. The [3'-32P]-tRNA was aminoacylated and acetylated as described (28). Aminoacylation and acetylation were highly efficient (~100%), as assessed by acid gel electrophoresis (29). mRNAs were made by in vitro transcription, using T7 polymerase and plasmid templates, and purified as described (30). The initiation regions of the mRNAs employed are shown in Table 1. In each case, the P codon is cognate for the most abundant tRNA isoacceptor (31).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. mRNAs used in this study

 
Kinetic experiments and data analysis
The dissociation rate (koff) of tRNA from the P site was measured using a double-membrane filtration method as described (32). Typically, <50 nM [3'-32P]-tRNA (~20 000 cpm/pmol), 0.5 µM mRNA and 0.7 µM ribosomes were incubated in polymix buffer at 37°C for 20 min to bind the P site. At t = 0, 2 µl of the reaction was diluted 100-fold in polymix buffer containing 0.2 µM unlabeled tRNA, and 20 µl aliquots were filtered at various time points. Membranes were immediately washed with 200 µl of polymix buffer, dried and exposed to a phosphor screen (Amersham). Data were quantified, corrected for background (based on reactions lacking ribosomes), and normalized to the fraction of radiolabel on the nitrocellulose membrane at t = 0. koff was determined by fitting the data to a single exponential function, using KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software). When mutant 50S subunits were used, 30S subunits were first heat-activated at 42°C for 20 min and then incubated in the presence of an equal amount of 50S subunits for 10 min at 37°C to form 70S ribosomes.

Variance in koff among different tRNA species was calculated from the variance ({sigma}2) of the natural logarithms of the rate using the following formula:

Formula

where N is the number of tRNA species, ki is koff of a certain tRNA species, and Formula is the average of lnkoff for all the tRNAs. This variance is independent of the units in which the ki are measured. By taking natural logarithms, the data are effectively normalized to allow the variance for each mutant ribosome to be compared. The calculated variance values are proportional to the variance in binding free energies among different tRNA species. In principle, this variance contains two contributions: the true biological variation of the rates ki and the experimental uncertainty of the measurements of the ki. Since the uncertainty {Delta}lnki of lnki is given by {Delta}lnki = {Delta}ki/ki, the contribution of the experimental uncertainty to the variance can be calculated as

Formula

Measured variances that exceed this uncertainty-based variance are statistically significant and thus biologically meaningful.

The association rate (kon) of tRNA with the P site was estimated as described (15). Briefly, 1 µM mRNA and various concentrations of ribosomes were incubated at 37°C for 10 min, mixed with an equal volume of [3'-32P]-tRNA (<2.5 nM final) at t = 0, and incubated at 37°C. 2 µl of the reaction was filtered at various time points. Membranes were immediately washed with 20 µl of ice-cold polymix buffer and quantified as described above. Data were corrected for the background based on the fraction of radiolabel on the nitrocellulose membrane without ribosomes (t = 0) and fit to a single exponential function. kon was then calculated based on the apparent rates, the ribosome concentrations, and the independently determined koff value.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Mutagenesis of the 30S ribosomal subunit
Mutations in 16S rRNA targeting the A site (position 1054), P site (positions 790, 966, 1338, 1400 and 926), and E site (positions 693 and 795) were introduced into a {Delta}7 prrn strain of E. coli SQZ10 (Figure 1). This strain lacks chromosomal rRNA operons and is supported by a single plasmid-encoded rrn operon and hence a homogeneous population of ribosomes. At least two different substitutions at each of these positions were tolerated in {Delta}7 prrn (Table 2). The effects of these mutations on growth rate were generally modest and only roughly correlated with their effects on in vivo translation, as measured in a specialized ribosome system (22). Why a better correlation was not observed remains unclear. However, the fact that the control {Delta}7 prrn strain contains wild-type ribosomes but grows considerably more slowly than wild-type E. coli suggests that its growth is limited by something other than translation per se. We attempted to obtain {Delta}7 prrn strains with mutations C1054G, C1400G, A1339C, A1339G and A1339U, but were unsuccessful. Presumably, the corresponding mutant ribosomes cannot support cell growth. This may be due to a high error rate in the case of C1054G (S. McClory and K.F., unpublished data), and low translation activity (<6%) in the other cases (Table 2) (22). Ribosomes with A790G, m2G966U, C1054A, G1338A, G1338U, C1400A, G926C, G693C or C795G were purified for further analysis. Ribosomes were also purified from strains that express S9 and S13 with C-terminal truncations (14) and S7 with a partial deletion of the β-hairpin element (25).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Effects of 16S rRNA mutations on cell growth in {Delta}7 prrn

 
Effects of 16S rRNA mutations on tRNAVal binding
Uhlenbeck and colleagues measured the dissociation rate (koff) and association rate (kon) of a number of different tRNA species in the ribosomal P site, using a double-membrane filter binding method (12,32,33). In those studies, it was found that kon was nearly identical among nine natural tRNAs. Using the same method, we found that kon of tRNAVal in polymix buffer was virtually unchanged by the 30S mutations (<2-fold), whereas a number of these mutations increased koff substantially (Figure 2; Table 3). Thus, koff values correlated well with calculated Kd values (Table 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. Effects of 16S rRNA mutations on the binding of tRNAVal. (A) Examples of experiments measuring association of tRNAVal with the P site of control and mutant ribosomes at 7 nM. (B) Examples of experiments measuring dissociation of tRNAVal from the P site of control and mutant ribosomes. Data were normalized at t = 0. For values of the dissociation and association rate constants, see Table 3.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Effects of mutations in the 30S subunit on the binding of tRNAVal to the P site

 
Effects of 30S subunit mutations on tRNA dissociation
Next, we measured the effect of each 30S mutation on koff of tRNAPhe, tRNAVal and tRNATyr from the P site of the 70S ribosome. Mutations A790G, m2G966U, G1338U, C795G and S9{Delta}113–117 increased koff of all three tRNA species in the P site (Figure 3A; Supplementary Table 1). With the exception of C795G, these mutations directly target the 30S P site. Mutations G693C, G926C and G1338A had smaller effects on koff. G1338A modestly decreased koff of tRNAPhe, as might be predicted from earlier observations (22,24), and modestly increased koff of the other tRNAs. Several mutations (C1054A, C1400A, S13{Delta}128–130 and S7{Delta}77–84) had no appreciable effect on koff of these tRNAs in the P site. Dissociation of Ac-aa-tRNAs was virtually unaffected by any of the 30S mutations, with slight increases in koff of AcTyr-tRNATyr conferred by some of the mutations that also destabilized deacylated tRNAs (Figure 3B; Supplementary Table 1).


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. Effects of 30S mutations on the dissociation rate (koff) of tRNA from the P site. koff of deacylated (A), N-acetyl-aminoacylated (B) or A76-truncated (C) tRNAPhe (blue), tRNAVal (orange) and tRNATyr (green) from the P site in various mutant ribosomes. Data represent mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments.

 
Removal of A76 from tRNA stabilizes its binding in the presence of G1338U
Deacylated tRNA is known to spontaneously oscillate between the P/P and P/E sites, while acylated tRNA is restricted in the P/P site (2,3,34,35). The fact that many of the 30S mutations failed to increase koff of Ac-aa-tRNA raised the possibility that their effects on deacylated tRNA involved P/E-site binding. To investigate this possibility, we used tRNAs with truncation of nt A76. A76 is the universally conserved 3' terminal nt of tRNA. In the 50S P site, A76 interacts with A2450 and A2451 of 23S rRNA. In the 50S E site, A76 intercalates between G2421 and A2122 and interacts with C2394 of 23S rRNA (18,19,36). Removal of A76 ({Delta}A76) from tRNAPhe reduces its affinity for the E site by >100-fold but does not affect its affinity for the P site (37). Based on these observations, {Delta}A76 should shift the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E equilibrium to the left (5,6,28). With this in mind, we measured dissociation rates of tRNAVal{Delta}A76, tRNAPhe{Delta}A76 and tRNATyr{Delta}A76 from the P site of ribosomes harboring the 30S mutations (Figure 3C). We found that {Delta}A76 generally decreased koff of tRNAVal from the P site of mutant ribosomes and had a similar, albeit lesser, effect on tRNAPhe. In contrast, {Delta}A76 increased koff of tRNATyr in all cases except G1338U. Notably, koff of all 3'-truncated tRNAs in the presence of G1338U was virtually the same as the control (Figure 3C), even though this mutation had strong effects on koff of the full-length deacylated tRNAs (Figure 3A).

50S E-site mutation C2394A restores tight binding of certain tRNAs to ribosomes harboring G1338U
The effects of {Delta}A76 in G1338U ribosomes could be related to a reduced occupancy of the P/E site. To further investigate relationship between P/E-site binding and koff, we compared dissociation rates of 6 different tRNA species (tRNAVal, tRNAGlu, tRNAMet, tRNAPhe, tRNATyr and tRNAArg) from ribosomes harboring various 30S P-site mutations in the absence and presence of C2394A (Figure 4; Supplementary Table 2). Mutation C2394A of 23S rRNA targets the 50S E site and is predicted to shift the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E equilibrium to the left (10,18,19,28,36). koff of tRNAs from the P site of ribosomes containing the wild-type 30S subunit was virtually unchanged by C2394A. koff of N-acetyl-Val-tRNAVal (AcVal-tRNAVal) and N-acetyl-Tyr-tRNATyr (AcTyr-tRNATyr) was also unaffected by C2394A (Figure 4A, E). In the presence of the 30S P-site mutations, koff of tRNAVal and tRNAGlu was strongly decreased by C2394A (Figure 4A, B). C2394A modestly decreased koff of tRNAMet and tRNAPhe, and tRNATyr in G1338U ribosomes but did not decrease koff of tRNAArg in any case tested (Figure 4A–F).


Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. Effects of E-site mutation C2394A on dissociation of tRNA from the P site. koff of tRNAVal and AcVal-tRNAVal (A), tRNAGlu (B), tRNAMet (C), tRNAPhe (D), tRNATyr and AcTyr-tRNATyr (E), and tRNAArg (F) from the P site was measured in ribosomes harboring rRNA mutations (as indicated). Note that the scale of the y-axis in (B and C) is larger than in the other analogous panels. Data represent the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (G) Variance among elongator tRNA species. Variance was calculated from the natural logarithm of koff of six deacylated tRNAs in (A–F). (H) koff of initiator tRNAfMet from the P site.

 
To quantify the uniformity among koff of different elongator tRNAs, we calculated the variance ({sigma}2) of the natural logarithm of koff (see Material and methods section). A uniform set of rate constants should give {sigma}2 {approx} 0.02 based on the experimental uncertainties of the rates. It was evident that whereas A790G, m2G966U, and G1338U all increase {sigma}2 in ribosomes with control 50S subunits, introduction of C2394A greatly decreased {sigma}2 (i.e. increased uniformity) in ribosomes harboring G1338U (Figure 4G).

koff of initiator tRNAfMet is unaffected by mutations of the 30S P site
Initiator tRNAfMet is the only tRNA that enters the P site directly (i.e. without first passing through the A site). Initiator tRNAfMet has distinct structural features such as a mismatch between bases C1 and A72 and three consecutive G-C base pairs in the anticodon stem. The C1xA72 mismatch is important for formylation of the methionyl group, which allows IF2 recognition and prevents EF-Tu interaction (38). The three G–C base pairs in the anticodon stem are necessary for efficient initiation, presumably due to their ability to stabilize fMet-tRNAfMet in the 30S P site (23,38–40). To investigate how these structural differences affect the binding of tRNA to the 70S ribosome, we measured koff of initiator tRNAfMet in the presence of the 30S P-site mutations (Figure 4H; Supplementary Table 2). Surprisingly, none of the ribosomal mutations affected koff of tRNAfMet in the P site. This phenomenon seems specific for tRNAfMet, because koff of tRNAMet, like other elongator tRNAs, was affected by these mutations (Figure 4C). The fact that tRNAfMet and tRNAMet possess the same anticodon suggests that the differential effects observed are due to properties of the tRNA body.

50S P-site mutation G2252U increases koff of Ac-aa-tRNA, but not deacylated tRNA
We also measured koff of tRNAs from ribosomes harboring mutation G2252U in 23S rRNA. G2252 forms a Watson–Crick base pair with C74 of tRNA in the 50S P site, and thus this mutation is predicted to shift the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E equilibrium to the right (3,8,18,19,28,41). We found that dissociation of tRNAVal and tRNATyr was unaffected by G2252U, whereas that of AcVal-tRNAVal and AcTyr-tRNATyr was accelerated by the mutation (Figure 5; Supplementary Table 2). These data are consistent with the idea that deacylated tRNA can readily occupy either the P/P or P/E site, whereas peptidyl-tRNA is largely restricted to the P/P site.


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. Effects of 50S P-site mutation G2252U on koff. koff of tRNAVal and AcVal-tRNAVal (A), and tRNATyr and AcTyr-tRNATyr (B) from the P site was measured in ribosomes harboring rRNA mutations (as indicated). Data represent the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments.

 
Effects of 50S mutations C2394A and G2252U on kon of tRNA
To test if the 50S mutations affect kon, we measured association of tRNAVal and tRNATyr with ribosomes harboring C2394A or G2252U (Figure 6). C2394A inhibited association of tRNAVal and tRNATyr with the ribosome by 110-fold and 16-fold, respectively, suggesting that the 50S E site is critical for association of deacylated tRNA. We then measured kon of AcVal-tRNAVal and AcTyr-tRNATyr with the same set of ribosomes. It was found that the N-acetyl-aminoacyl form of both tRNA species binds to control ribosomes much more slowly (>40-fold and >9-fold for tRNAVal and tRNATyr, respectively) than deacylated tRNAs (Figure 6C and D). The overall kon of Ac-aa-tRNA was virtually unaffected by the 50S mutations and similar to kon of deacylated tRNA with ribosomes harboring C2394A, suggesting that tRNA can bind to ribosomes, albeit at a relatively slow rate, via a pathway in which the 50S E site is not involved.


Figure 6
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 6. Effects of 50S mutations C2394A and G2252U on kon. (A and B) Examples of experiments measuring the association rate (kon) of tRNAVal (A) or tRNATyr (B) with ribosomes harboring C2394A (filled square) or G2252U (filled triangle) at 14 nM. Appropriate controls (control-1 for C2394A, filled circle; control-2 for G2252U, open circle) are also included. (C and D) kon of tRNAVal (C) or tRNATyr (D) in the deacyl or N-acetyl-aminoacyl form (as indicated) to ribosomes harboring the 50S mutations. Data represent the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we compare the effects of a number of ribosomal mutations on tRNA binding. Several mutations (A790G, m2G966U, G1338U, C795G and S9{Delta}113–117) destabilize elongator tRNAs in the P site of the 70S ribosome. The degree to which a given ribosomal mutation affects tRNA binding depends on the species of tRNA. For example, A790G generally increases koff of all elongator tRNA species tested (tRNAVal, tRNAGlu, tRNAMet, tRNAPhe, tRNATyr and tRNAArg), while m2G966U and G1338U are unable to destabilize tRNAArg. The relative effects of the 30S mutations vary significantly among tRNA species (e.g. tRNAVal and tRNAGlu are destabilized most by G1338U, tRNAPhe and tRNATyr are destabilized most by m2G966U, and tRNAArg is destabilized most by A790G). These data support the idea that multiple contacts in the 30S subunit idiosyncratically tune tRNA binding to the P site (12).

Deacylated tRNA spontaneously oscillates between the P/P and P/E sites of the ribosome. Because no other intermediate binding states have been observed in the absence of factors, it is reasonable to assume that tRNAs dissociate from either the P/P or P/E site in our experiments (Figure 7). Since the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E transition occurs much more rapidly (1–5 s–1; 1,3) than dissociation of tRNA (0.0002–0.005 s–1), the observed dissociation rate (koff) expressed as a function of the rate and equilibrium constants shown in Figure 7 is

Formula

According to this model, the observed koff is more strongly influenced by koffP/P or koffP/E when the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E equilibrium is shifted to the left or right, respectively. Mutation C2394A, which decreases KP/E (i.e., shifts the P/P {leftrightarrows} P/E equilibrium to the left), decreases koff of tRNAVal from the P site (Figure 4A). Mutation G2252U, which increases KP/E, has little effect on koff (Figure 5A). These data suggest that dissociation via the E site is the primary dissociation pathway of tRNAVal. Consistent with this idea, addition of E-site tRNA prevents dissociation of tRNAVal from the P site when spontaneous reverse translocation is inhibited by tetracycline (42). tRNAGlu, like tRNAVal, also appears to dissociate mostly from the P/E site because C2394A inhibits dissociation of tRNAGlu. In contrast, tRNAMet, tRNAPhe, tRNATyr and tRNAArg may dissociate from the P/P and P/E sites at similar rates because C2394A has little or no effect on koff of these tRNAs. Unlike deacylated tRNAs, acylated tRNAs are believed to be largely restricted to the P/P site (2,3,34,35). The 50S P-site mutation G2252U increases koff of AcVal-tRNAVal and AcTyr-tRNATyr, an effect that requires the acyl group in both cases. Because C2394A does not affect koff of these acylated tRNAs, it is likely that they dissociate primarily from the P/P site.


Figure 7
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 7. A model for dissociation and association pathways of P-tRNA.

 
Association of tRNAVal and tRNATyr with the ribosome is strongly inhibited by C2394A, suggesting that the 50S E site is involved in the association pathway of deacylated tRNA. Because acylation of these tRNAs also inhibits association to a similar degree, we conclude that affinity for the 50S E site is critical for rapid non-enzymatic association of tRNA with the P site in vitro, in agreement with an earlier study (43). That deacylated tRNA passes through the E site for P-site dissociation and association is consistent with the previous suggestion that the E site provides a labile intermediate site between the P site and the solvent (5,13).

For deacylated tRNAVal and tRNAPhe, the 30S mutations increase koff to various extents depending on the mutation. But when these same tRNAs are acylated, only a narrow range of koff values (near 2.5 x 10–4 s–1) is observed among all the mutant ribosomes (Figure 2B; Supplementary Table 1). A similar narrow range of koff values is seen when dissociation of tRNAfMet from the set of mutant ribosomes is measured (Figure 4H; Supplementary Table 2). It is as though the effects of the 30S mutations are masked in some way when the N-acetyl-aminoacyl groups are present or when tRNAfMet is used. A similar phenomenon has been observed for the A site, where substantial variation in koff among a set of tRNA derivatives was revealed only when mRNA-tRNA or mRNA-rRNA interactions were weakened (44). It was proposed that there exists a stability threshold for A-tRNA, such that koff values below 0.5 x 10–4 s–1 are not observed regardless of how many tRNA-ribosome contacts are optimized. This stability threshold may explain how uniform binding of the various natural tRNA substrates is achieved. The molecular basis of this stability threshold remains unclear but presumably involves a conformational change in the ribosomal complex that facilitates A-tRNA release. The rate of this conformational change may set and thereby reflect the minimum koff threshold. Based on our data, we propose that a stability threshold also exists for P-tRNA. Whether a common molecular mechanism sets the thresholds for both A-tRNA and P-tRNA remains to be determined, but the fact that these koff thresholds are similar is consistent with this possibility.

The 50S E-site mutation C2394A generally stabilizes tRNA in G1338U ribosomes and thereby increases the uniformity of tRNA binding. The simplest interpretation of these data is that G1338U makes tRNA in the P/E site particularly vulnerable to dissociation. Chemical protection experiments have shown that the movement of tRNA from the P/P to P/E site changes the reactivity of only two nucleotides in 16S rRNA: A702 becomes hyper-reactive and G1338 becomes further protected (2). Increased protection of G1338 suggests an altered interaction of this residue with the anticodon stem of tRNA in the P/E site. X-ray structures of ribosomes containing P/P-tRNA reveal that the loop containing G1338 and A1339, together with the 790 loop, form a ‘gate’ between the P and E sites that appears to lock the ASL in the P site (18–20,45). Cryo-EM studies indicate that movement of tRNA into the P/E site promotes a large-scale conformational change termed ratchet-like subunit rotation (RSR; 7,46–51). The RSR includes a rotation of the 1338–1339 loop and an opening of the ‘gate’ (52). We propose that this rearrangement buries the base of G1338 deeper into the minor groove of the anticodon stem of tRNA, which would explain the enhanced protection of G1338 by P/E-tRNA (2). Because the RSR conformation opens the ‘gate’, G1338 may be more critical in RSR ribosomes for preventing premature tRNA release.

Initiator tRNAfMet binds tightly to the P site of 70S ribosomes, and the 30S mutations analyzed here have no appreciable effect on koff (Figure 4H). The robust nature of tRNAfMet binding could be conferred by the unique features of tRNAfMet, such as the C1xA72 mismatch or the three consecutive G–C base pairs in the anticodon stem (38). However, neither C1U nor A72G (either of which allows the 1–72 base pair to form) increased koff of tRNAfMet in the P site (data not shown). Furthermore, converting the anticodon stem of tRNAfMet into that of tRNAGlu had only a marginal effect on koff from 70S ribosomes (<2-fold; data not shown). This latter observation was quite unexpected, since these 3 consecutive G–C base pairs serve to stabilize initiator tRNA in the P site of in the 30S subunit (39,40). One explanation is that the combination of these elements and the unique conformation that tRNAfMet tends to adopt (53) contribute to its stable binding. Further experiments will be necessary to sort out which features of tRNAfMet contribute to its robust interaction with the 70S ribosome.


   SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.


   FUNDING
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
REFERENCES
 
National Institutes of Health (GM072528 [GenBank] to K.F.); the National Science Foundation (DMR-0706002 to R.B.). Funding for open access charge: GM072528.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank C. Squires and S. Quan for E. coli strain SQZ10, H. Roy for ATP(CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase, and S. McClory and D. Qin for comments on the article.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fei J, Kosuri P, MacDougall DD, Gonzalez RL. Coupling of ribosomal L1 stalk and tRNA dynamics during translation elongation. Mol. Cell (2008) 30:348–359.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  2. Moazed D, Noller HF. Intermediate states in the movement of transfer RNA in the ribosome. Nature (1989) 342:142–148.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Munro JB, Altman RB, O'Connor N, Blanchard SC. Identification of two distinct hybrid states intermediates on the ribosome. Mol. Cell (2007) 25:505–517.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  4. Odom OW, Picking WD, Hardesty B. Movement of tRNA but not the nascent peptide during peptide bond formation on ribosomes. Biochemistry (1990) 29:10734–10744.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  5. Lill R, Robertson JM, Wintermeyer W. Binding of the 3' terminus of tRNA to 23S rRNA in the ribosomal exit site actively promotes translocation. EMBO J. (1989) 8:3933–3938.[Web of Science][Medline]

  6. Feinberg J, Joseph S. Identification of molecular interactions between P site tRNA and the ribosome essential for translocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98:11120–11125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Valle M, Zavialov A, Sengupta J, Rawat U, Ehrenberg M, Frank J. Locking and unlocking of ribosomal motions. Cell (2003) 114:123–134.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  8. Dorner S, Brunelle JL, Sharma D, Green R. The hybrid state of tRNA binding is an authentic translation elongation intermediate. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (2006) 13:234–241.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  9. Pan D, Kirillov SV, Cooperman BS. Kinetically competent intermediates in the translocation step of protein synthesis. Mol. Cell (2007) 25:519–529.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  10. Walker SE, Shoji S, Pan D, Cooperman BS, Fredrick K. Role of hybrid tRNA-binding states in ribosomal translocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2008) 105:9192–9197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Rose SJ III, Lowary PT, Uhlenbeck OC. Binding of yeast tRNAPhe anticodon arm to Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomes. J. Mol. Biol. (1983) 167:103–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  12. Olejniczak M, Dale T, Fahlman RP, Uhlenbeck OC. Idiosyncratic tuning of tRNAs to achieve uniform ribosome binding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (2005) 12:788–793.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  13. Lill R, Robertson JM, Wintermeyer W. Affinities of tRNA binding sites of ribosomes from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry (1986) 25:3245–3255.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  14. Hoang L, Fredrick K, Noller HF. Creating ribosomes with an all-RNA 30S subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:12439–12443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Antoun A, Pavlov MY, Lovmar M, Ehrenberg M. How initiation factors maximize the accuracy of tRNA selection in initiation of bacterial protein synthesis. Mol. Cell (2006) 23:183–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  16. Wohlgemuth I, Beringer M, Rodnina MV. Rapid peptide bond formation on isolated 50S ribosomal subunits. EMBO Rep. (2006) 7:699–703.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  17. Shoji S, Walker SE, Fredrick K. Ribosomal translocation: One step closer to the molecular mechanism. ACS Chem. Biol. (2009) 4:93–107.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

  18. Selmer M, Dunham CM, Murphy FV, Weixlbaumer A, Petry S, Kelley AC, Weir JR, Ramakrishnan V. Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science (2006) 313:1935–1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Korostelev A, Trakhanov S, Laurberg M, Noller HF. Crystal structure of a 70S ribosome-tRNA complex reveals functional interactions and rearrangements. Cell (2006) 126:1–13.[CrossRef]

  20. Berk V, Zhang W, Pai RD, Cate JHD. Structural basis for mRNA and tRNA positioning on the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2006) 103:15830–15834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D'Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Muller KM, et al. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BioMed Central Bioinformatics (2002) 3:15.[CrossRef]

  22. Abdi NM, Fredrick K. Contribution of 16S rRNA nucleotides forming the 30S subunit A and P sites to translation in Escherichia coli. RNA (2005) 11:1624–1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Lancaster L, Noller HF. Involvement of 16S rRNA nucleotides G1338 and A1339 in discrimination of initiator tRNA. Mol. Cell (2005) 20:623–632.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  24. Qin D, Abdi NM, Fredrick K. Characterization of 16S rRNA mutations that decrease the fidelity of translation initiation. RNA (2007) 13:2348–2355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Devaraj A, Shoji S, Holbrook ED, Fredrick K. A role for the 30S subunit E site in maintenance of the translational reading frame. RNA (2009) 15:255–265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Ehrenberg M, Bilgin N, Kurland CG. Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis – A practical approach—Spedding G, ed. (1990) Oxford: IRL Press. 101–129.

  27. Youngman EM, Green R. Affinity purification of in vivo-assembled ribosomes for in vitro biochemical analysis. Methods (2005) 36:305–312.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  28. McGarry KG, Walker SE, Wang H, Fredrick K. Destabilization of the P site codon-anticodon helix results from movement of tRNA into the P/E hybrid state within the ribosome. Mol. Cell (2005) 20:613–622.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  29. Walker SE, Fredrick K. Preparation and evaluation of acylated tRNAs. Methods (2008) 44:81–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  30. Fredrick K, Noller HF. Accurate translocation of mRNA by the ribosome requires a peptidyl group or its analog on the tRNA moving into the 30S P site. Mol. Cell (2002) 9:1125–1131.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  31. Dong H, Nillson L, Kurland CG. Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J. Mol. Biol. (1996) 260:649–663.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  32. Fahlman RP, Uhlenbeck OC. Contribution of the esterified amino acid to the binding of aminoacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal P- and A-sites. Biochemistry (2004) 43:7575–7583.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  33. Fahlman RP, Dale T, Uhlenbeck OC. Uniform binding of aminoacylated transfer RNAs to the ribosomal A and P sites. Mol. Cell (2004) 16:799–805.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  34. Odom OW, Hardesty B. An apparent conformational change in tRNA(Phe) that is associated with the peptidyl transferase reaction. Biochimie (1987) 69:925–938.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  35. Blanchard SC, Kim HD, Gonzalez RL, Puglisi JD, Chu S. tRNA dynamics on the ribosome during translation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:12893–12898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Schmeing TM, Moore PB, Steitz TA. Structures of deacylated tRNA mimics bound to the E site of the large ribosomal subunit. RNA (2003) 9:1345–1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Lill R, Lepier A, Schwagele F, Sprinzl M, Vogt H, Wintermeyer W. Specific recognition of the 3'-terminal adenosine of tRNAPhe in the exit site of Escherichia coli ribosomes. J. Mol. Biol. (1988) 203:699–705.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  38. RajBhandary UL. Initiator transfer RNAs. J. Bacteriol. (1994) 176:547–552.[Free Full Text]

  39. Seong BL, RajBhandary UL. Escherichia coli formylmethionine tRNA: Mutations in the GGG/CCC sequence conserved in anticodon stem of initiator tRNAs affect initiation of protein synthesis and conformation of anticodon loop. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1987) 84:334–338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  40. Mandal N, Mangroo D, Dalluge JJ, McCloskey JA, RajBhandary UL. Role of the three consecutive G:C base pairs conserved in the anticodon stem of initiator tRNAs in initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. RNA (1996) 2:473–482.[Abstract]

  41. Samaha RR, Green R, Noller HF. A base pair between tRNA and 23S rRNA in the peptidyl transferase centre of the ribosome [published erratum appears in Nature 1995 Nov 23;378(6555):419]. Nature (1995) 377:309–314.[CrossRef][Medline]

  42. Shoji S, Walker SE, Fredrick K. Reverse translocation of tRNA in the ribosome. Mol. Cell (2006) 24:931–942.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  43. Kirillov SV, Wower J, Hixson SS, Zimmermann RA. Transit of tRNA through the Escherichia coli ribosome: cross-linking of the 3' end of tRNA to ribosomal proteins at the P and E sites. FEBS Lett. (2002) 514:60–66.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  44. Dale T, Fahlman RP, Olejniczak M, Uhlenbeck OC. Specificity of the ribosomal A site for aminoacyl-tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. (2009) 37:1202–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Schuwirth BS, Borovinskaya MA, Hau CW, Zhang W, Vila-Sanjurjo A, Holton JM, Cate JHD. Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 Å resolution. Science (2005) 310:827–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  46. Frank J, Agrawal RK. A ratchet-like inter-subunit reorganization of the ribosome during translocation. Nature (2000) 406:318–322.[CrossRef][Medline]

  47. Spahn CM, Gomez-Lorenzo MG, Grassucci RA, Jorgensen R, Andersen GR, Beckmann R, Penczek PA, Ballesta JP, Frank J. Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation. EMBO J. (2004) 23:1008–1019.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  48. Taylor DJ, Nilsson J, Merrill AR, Andersen GR, Nissen P, Frank J. Structures of modified eEF2 80S ribosome complexes reveal the role of GTP hydrolysis in translocation. EMBO J. (2007) 26:2421–2431.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  49. Connell SR, Takemoto C, Wilson DN, Wang H, Murayama K, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Rost M, Schuler M, Giesebrecht J, et al. Structural basis for interaction of the ribosome with the switch regions of GTP-bound elongation factors. Mol. Cell (2007) 25:751–764.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  50. Agirrezabala X, Lei J, Brunelle JL, Ortiz-Meoz RF, Green R, Frank J. Visualization of the hybrid state of tRNA binding promoted by spontaneous ratcheting of the ribosome. Mol. Cell (2008) 32:190–197.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

  51. Julián P, Konevega AL, Scheres SH, Lázaro M, Gil D, Wintermeyer W, Rodnina MV, Valle M. Structure of ratcheted ribosomes with tRNAs in hybrid states. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2008) 105:16924–16927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  52. Li W, Frank J. Transfer RNA in the hybrid P/E state: Correlating molecular dynamics simulations with cryo-EM data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2007) 104:16540–16545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  53. Barraud P, Schmitt E, Mechulam Y, Dardel F, Tisne C. A unique conformation of the anticodon stem-loop is associated with the capacity of tRNAfMet to initiate protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. (2008) 36:4894–4901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (741K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (323K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/12/4033    most recent
gkp296v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fredrick, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fredrick, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?